No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Westlake Convalescent Hospital

316 S Westlake Avenue, Los Angeles, CA 90057 · For profit - Corporation · 114 certified beds · (213) 484-0510 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (213) 484-0510 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
No harm-level citations or fines — but 40 lower-level deficiencies on record (see below)
Insights

This home’s record is mixed — some reassuring signs, some worth asking about.

In its favor
  • a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
  • lower-than-typical staff turnover (23% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (40) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

4/5
CMS overall
4 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 3 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 4 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS
Urgent care / clinic
201 S Alvarado St · (213) 989-6959 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
2100 W 3rd St · (323) 914-9800 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
1840 W 3rd St · (213) 483-6343 · Call to confirm hours
Park
(209) 372-0200 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 4 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating4★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased2.2%10.2%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight10.0%4.0%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder4.1%0.8%0.9%worse
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection4.4%1.2%2.0%worse
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms0.0%7.3%6.5%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained4.0%0.4%0.1%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury0.7%1.6%3.3%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened2.7%9.8%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication19.4%13.7%18.9%typical
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine98.6%98.2%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers15.7%4.3%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control2.2%10.2%21.2%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table15.7%12.0%17.1%typical
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.0%1.5%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine86.7%93.2%79.4%typical
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission14.8%23.0%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit5.8%11.2%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.002.251.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days0.621.571.80better

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

0.04U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.04hours / resident / day
Physical therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.04 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 1% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 0% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified75.9%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened3.5%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFsnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.79
RN hours/ resident / day
2.74
LPN hours/ resident / day
3.21
Aide hours/ resident / day
6.74
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.71
RN hoursweekends
23.0%
Total nursing turnover
15.4%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 114 beds and averages 70.1 residents a day — about 61% occupied, or roughly 44 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 6.74 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.79 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.21 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 6.40 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 6.88 on weekdays — 7% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.82 to 0.71 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 23% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

10
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-07-18)
12
at the previous standard inspection (2024-06-23)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

40 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 30 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-27 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, and homelike environment for one of four sampled resident (Resident 1) by failing to ensure Resident 1's curtain strings were untangled, and the ceiling did not have multiple brownish stains. This failure had the potential to negatively impact on Resident 1's quality of life, and possible risk of infection.Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident 1 on 12/10/2022 and was re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including chronic respiratory failure (a condition that results in the inability to effectively exchange carbon dioxide and oxygen), tracheostomy (an opening surgically created through the neck into the trachea [windpipe] to allow direct access to the breathing tube) and dependence on respirator (ventilator-a machine or device used medically to support or replace the breathing of a person, unable to breath on their own). During review…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-27 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide an environment that is free from accident hazards in preventing avoidable accidents to one of six sampled residents (Resident 1) when Resident 1 was left unattended while up in the Hoyer lift (a medical device designed to safely transfer patients with limited mobility between beds, chairs, wheelchairs and showers). This deficient practice had the potential to negatively impact on Resident 1's safety, placing Resident 1 for possible fall or accident.Findings:During a review of Resident 1's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 1 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including chronic respiratory failure (a condition that results in the inability to effectively exchange carbon dioxide and oxygen), tracheostomy (an opening surgically created through the neck into the trachea [windpipe] to allow direct access to the breathing tube) and dependence on respirator…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-10 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain a clean, safe environment by failing to maintain the:Toilet, counter top and sink in the all gender bathroom next to the nursing station in good working order, clean and sanitary, by not securing the toilet to prevent it from shifting during use, keeping the sink counter corners free from crumbling grout/caulk, as well as, the sink being free from black mold-like build up under the lip of the counter. Wall in room [ROOM NUMBER] from crumbling behind the baseboard and it falling free from the wall, prevent crumbling wall corners above the baseboards and corners, as well as, free from dust and grime build up. Sink in the bathroom for rooms [ROOM NUMBERS], from pulling away from the wall from cracked caulking and peeling paint, keeping the exposed pipes to the sink clear of rust, as well as the walls above the baseboard on corners and edges intact and free from dirt and grime build up and the baseboard from peeling away from the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-10 · tag F0924 — isolated
    Put firmly secured handrails on each side of hallways.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain a safe environment by failing to secure the upper end of the stairway handrail (on the right side as you go up) to the wall.This deficient practice had the potential to affect staff and residents' safety while using the stairs. During a concurrent observation and interview on 4/10/26 at 11:51 am with the Maintenance Supervisor (MS) and Maintenance Assistant (MA), the handrail for the right hand side of the stairs from the parking lot to the first floor of the facility was observed with the top-end of the handrail loose from the wall, easily movable. The MS and MA both validated the handrail was loose, and the MS stated he just had to screw it in tighter to secure it, then the MA stated they may have to add a piece of wood to fix it but that it would get fixed. During a record review of facility's policy & procedure (P&P) titled, Quality of Life - Homelike Environment, revised 1/10/25, Residents are provided with a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment.The facility staff and management…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-18 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain safe resident smoking practices by failing to ensure one of one sampled resident (Resident 17) did not have a lighter in her possession. This deficient practice had the potential to cause injury to Resident 17.Findings:During a review of Resident 17's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident 17 on 3/21/2025 with diagnoses that included acute respiratory failure with hypoxia (a serious condition that happens when your lungs cannot get enough oxygen into your blood), morbid obesity (more than 80 to 100 pounds above their ideal body weight), ataxic gait (a walking pattern that's unsteady and clumsy, like someone who's drunk), cardiomyopathy (a disease that affects the heart muscle, making it difficult for the heart to pump blood effectively), acute on chronic congestive heart failure ((CHF-a heart disorder which causes the heart to not pump the blood efficiently, sometimes resulting in leg…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-18 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the standardized recipes for lunch menu were followed on 7/15/2025 by failing to ensure puree diet (foods that do not require chewing and are easily swallowed. All food should be smooth and pureed to the consistency of pudding.) received rice texture in form that meet their needs and in accordance with the International Dysphagia Diet Initiative (IDDSI - a framework made up of levels and describes food textures and drink thickness) Level Four (pureed foods and extremely thick drinks) when the texture of the pureed rice was thick and stuck to the spoon and the roof of the mouth.This failure had the potential to result in meal dissatisfaction and increased choking risk for residents on pureed diet.Findings:1.During an observation of the tray line (tray line-a system of food preparation, in which trays move along an assembly line) service for lunch on 7/15/2025 at 12:00PM, the pureed rice looked thick and sticky. During the serving of the pureed rice observed the rice stuck to the serving scoop. During a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-18 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe and sanitary food storage and food preparation practices in the kitchen when:1.The temperature of the walk-in refrigerator was 45 degrees Fahrenheit, and the gasket (door seal) of the walk-in refrigerator glass display door was broken, not allowing for the glass door to close tight. The temperature of the milk located by the glass display door was 44 degrees Fahrenheit. 2.Dishwasher 1 (DW1) working in the dish machine area did not wash hands and/or replace gloves when removing the clean and sanitized dishes form the dish machine.3.The base of the Dietary tray card holders was rusted. (Card Holder with a round base which sets firmly on resident meal tray with a holder to grip the diet cards-diet cards have the resident name and the diet order with resident preferences and allergies written on them).4. Food brought to residents from outside the facility was stored in the resident's food refrigerator unsealed, 5. The resident refrigerator was not clean and had brown color stains on the bottom shelf.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-07-18 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — pattern
    Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure four of five trash bins in the dumpster area were maintained in a sanitary manner. One trash bins had the lid open and three trash bins were rusted, broken and had corrosion that resulted in holes exposing the content inside the trash bins. This deficient practice had the potential for harborage and feeding of pests.Findings:During an observation in the main dumpster area located outside of the facility kitchen back door on 7/15/2025 at 9:30AM; one large recycle bin lid was not covered, there were boxes inside the bin and flies inside and around the bin. Three large trash dumpsters were corroded resulted in large holes and the trash was seen through the holes, the trash bins had orange color rust and broken at the bottom. There was cigarette butts stuck under the open seam of the trash bins.During a concurrent observation and interview with dietary supervisor (DS) and maintenance supervisor (MS) on 7/15/2025 at 9:30AM, the MS stated the three large trash bins were old, rusted and there were large holes…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-18 · tag F0644 — isolated
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure one of three sampled residents (Resident 10) had a follow up on coordinating a Preadmission Screening and Resident Review Level II (PASRR II- this evaluation determines the individuals specific needs and whether specialized services are required, ensuring the least restrictive setting for their care).This failure had the potential for Resident 10 to have a lack of necessary mental health services.Findings:During a review of Resident 10's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident 10 on 4/28/2023 with diagnosis of schizophrenia (a mental illness that can affect thoughts, mood, and behavior), and bipolar disorder (sometimes called manic-depressive disorder; mood swings that range from the lows of depression to elevated periods of emotional highs).During a review of Resident 10's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a resident assessment tool) dated 5/10/2025, the MDS indicated the resident was alert and oriented to person but not time with good recall. The MDS indicated Resident 10 did not feel…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-18 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure to label the nasal cannula (a small plastic tube, which fits into the person's nostrils for providing supplemental oxygen) oxygen tubing for two of two sampled residents (Resident 84 and Resident 24).This failure had the potential for Resident 84 and Resident 24 to be at risk for infection.Findings:a. During a review of Resident 24's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the facility admitted the resident on 09/03/2015 with diagnoses including chronic congestive heart failure (CHF-a heart disorder which causes the heart to not pump the blood efficiently, sometimes resulting in leg swelling), and adult failure to thrive (insufficient weight gain).During a review of Resident 24's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a resident assessment tool) dated 6/4/2025, the MDS indicated the resident was oriented to place and person and had good recall. The MDS indicated Resident 24 had interest in doing things, and did not feel down, depressed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 30 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-18 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a dialysis (a treatment to cleanse the blood of wastes and extra fluids artificially through a machine when the kidney(s) have failed) emergency kit (e-kit, collection of supplies that you might need during a time of emergency) at bedside for one of seven sampled residents on dialysis (Resident 85). This failure had the potential for Resident 85 to receive delayed intervention in managing complications such as bleeding.Findings:During a review of Resident 85's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included, but not limited to end stage renal disease with dependence on dialysis, diabetes mellitus (DM-a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound healing), gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD - a condition in which stomach acid flows back up into the esophagus (food pipe) causing heartburn), hypertension (HTN-high blood…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-18 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that its medication error rate was less than five percent (%). Two errors out of 29 opportunities contributed to an overall error rate of 6.9 % affecting one of four residents observed for medication administration (Resident 31). The errors noted were as follows:1. Attempted administration of approximately 7.5 milliliters (mL) of vitamin C (a vitamin supplement) liquid, instead of 5mL as per physician's orders.2. Attempted administration of approximately 7.5mL of levetiracetam (a medication used to treat seizures) liquid, instead of 5mL as per physician's orders.The deficient practice of failing to administer medications in accordance with the physician's orders increased the risk that Resident 31 may have experienced medical complications that could result in hospitalization.Findings:During a review of Resident 31's admission Record (a document containing diagnostic and demographic information), dated 7/17/25, the admission record…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-18 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of four residents observed for medication administration (Resident 31) was free of significant medication errors (an observed or identified incident in the preparation or administration of medications that causes the patient discomfort or jeopardizes their health or safety) when on 7/16/2025 Licensed Vocational Nurse 3 (LVN 3) was observed attempting to administer 7.5 milliliters (mL) of levetiracetam liquid (a medication used to treat seizures) instead of 5mL ordered by the physician.The deficient practice of failing to administer medications in accordance with the physician's orders increased the risk that Resident 31 may have experienced medical complications resulting in hospitalization.Findings:During a review of Resident 31's admission Record (a document containing diagnostic and demographic information) dated 7/17/25, the admission record indicated he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and most recently readmitted on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-18 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolated
    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the call light (a device that alerts healthcare providers that the patient needs assistance) was within reach for one of one sampled resident (Resident 22).This deficient practice had the potential to result in delay in meeting Resident 22's need for assistance.Findings:During a review of Resident 22's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the most recent readmission on [DATE], with diagnoses that included, but not limited to chronic respiratory failure (a condition where the lungs cannot get enough oxygen into the blood or eliminate enough carbon dioxide from the body), diabetes mellitus (DM-a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound healing), schizophrenia (a mental illness that is characterized by disturbances in thought), Parkinson's disease (a progressive disease of the nervous system marked by tremor, muscular rigidity, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-06-23 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — pattern
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that a resident with an indwelling catheter (a flexible plastic tube inserted into the bladder that remains there to provide continuous urinary drainage) received proper care and services for three of five sampled residents (Resident 20, 57, and 64) as evidenced by: -For Resident 20 the facility staff did not empty the indwelling catheter urinary collection bag (designed to collect urine drained from the bladder via a catheter) as ordered by the physician. -For Resident 57 the facility failed to maintain the resident's urinary catheter bag below the level of the bladder. -Fore Resident 64, there was no assessment for indwelling catheter removal. These deficient practices had the potential to result in urinary tract infection (UTI-an infection involving any part of the urinary system, including urethra, bladder, ureters, and kidney) and had a potential to lead to urosepsis (a potentially life-threatening complication of urinary tract…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-23 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to store Tuberculin purified protein derivative (Tuberculin PPD- used in skin test to help diagnose tuberculosis [ infection caused by bacteria Mycobacterium tuberculosis]), according to manufacturer's recommendation. -Label Latanoprost (eye drops used to increase the outflow of fluid from the eye) with an open date. -Discard multi-dose of Clearlax (a medication used to treat occasional constipation) and Reguloid (a medication used to treat constipation) after 60 days of opening. This deficient practice had a potential for the residents to receive medications with improper efficacy due to improper storage condition of medications. Findings: During medication storage observation and concurrent interview on 6/21/2024 at 12:29 PM, with Registered Nurse (RN) 2, one open vial of Tuberculin PPD with expiration date 12/2025, and open date 5/29/2024, was observed in the medication refrigerator. RN 2 stated the label on the vial indicated to refrigerate until opened. RN 2 stated Tuberculin PPD medication had to be stored in the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-23 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff followed food production recipes and fortified diet (diet to increase caloric intake) guidelines during lunch service when: -Fortified diets (diet enriched to increase caloric content) were not prepared and were not served to 10 residents who were on fortified diet. -Six residents on pureed diet (foods that do not require chewing and are easily swallowed. All foods should be smooth and pureed to the consistency of pudding) did not receive the pureed lettuce, tomato, and pickles with their meal per the menu. This deficient practice had the potential to result in meal dissatisfaction for residents on puree diet, decrease caloric intake and unintentional weight loss for residents who were on fortified diet. Findings: a. During the tray line observation on 6/22/2024 at 11:35 AM, residents who were on fortified diet the Dietary Aide (DA) 1 communicated the fortified diet orders during lunch service but [NAME] 1 who was serving the food did not add any additional food items per fortified menu. During a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-23 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe and sanitary food storage practices when: -Two previously cooked and frozen roast pork was thawing in the walk-in refrigerator with no pull out or thaw date. -One large turkey thawing in the walk-in refrigerator labeled with the wrong thaw date. -The walk-in freezer had ice buildup on the freezer ceiling, condenser, and pipes. Icicles hanging from the ceiling above food. There was a large deep pan in the freezer filled with solid ice and water leaking from above. These deficiencies had the potential to result in harmful bacteria growth, cross contamination (transfer of harmful bacteria form one place to another) and inappropriate storage of food and had the potential to affect 30 out 63 residents who eat food from facility kitchen. Findings: During an observation in the kitchen on 6/21/2024 at 5:15 PM, there was one previously cooked and frozen roast pork wrapped in foil with date of 6/13/2024 stored in the walk-in refrigerator. There was another previously cooked and frozen roast pork with dates…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-23 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure the call light was within reach for one of five sampled residents (Resident 22). This deficient practice had the potential to result in the resident not being able to call nursing staff for assistance when needed. Findings: A review of the admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident 22 on 5/25/2016, with diagnoses including hemiplegia (paralysis of one side of the body), blindness of the left eye, dependence on the wheelchair, type 2 diabetes (a long-term condition in which the body has trouble controlling blood sugar and using it for energy), and schizophrenia (a disorder that affects a person's ability to think, feel, and behave clearly). A review of Resident 22's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a standardized assessment and care screening tool) dated 6/9/2024, indicated the resident had moderately impaired cognition (a person's ability to think, learn, remember, use judgement, and make decisions) skills for daily decision making. The MDS indicated Resident 22 required supervision or touching…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-23 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a current copy of the resident's advance directive (AD, a written instruction, recognized under State law, relating to the provision of health care when the individual is unable to make decisions for themselves) was in the resident's medical chart for one of three sampled residents (Resident 40). This deficient practice had the potential for the facility to not honor the resident's medical decisions regarding end-of-life treatment. Findings: A review of Resident 40's admission Record indicated the facility admitted the resident on 12/15/2023, with diagnoses including chronic respiratory failure (a condition that occurs when the lungs cannot get enough oxygen into the blood or eliminate enough carbon dioxide from the body), end stage of renal disease (final , permanent stage of chronic kidney disease, where kidney function has declined to the point that the kidneys can no longer function on their own), and dementia (decline in mental ability severe enough to interfere with daily functioning/life). A review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-23 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolated
    Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to accommodate communication needs for one of five sampled residents (Resident 59) by failing to keep a Korean communication board (a tool that includes pictures that help residents communicate their healthcare and every-day needs to facility staff) that help residents at bedside within the resident's reach. This deficient practice had the potential for Resident 59 to not be able to communicate their needs to the facility staff. Findings: A review of Resident 59's admission Record indicated the facility admitted the resident on 7/20/2023, with diagnoses that included osteomyelitis (an infection in the bone), type 2 diabetes (a long-term condition in which the body has trouble controlling blood sugar and using it for energy), hyperlipidemia (high levels of cholesterol in the blood), muscle weakness, and metabolic encephalopathy (a problem in the brain caused by a chemical imbalance in the blood). A review of Resident 59's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a standardized assessment and care screening tool) dated 4/30/2024,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-23 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide oral care for one of three sampled residents (Resident 2), who was totally dependent upon staff for all activities of daily living (ADLs - essential and routine activities include eating, dressing, getting into or out of a bed or chair, taking a bath or shower, and using the toilet), was unable to breathe independently and was ventilator (a machine that helps one breathe) dependent. This deficient practice had the potential to place Resident 39 at risk for ventilator associated infection. Findings: A review of Resident 2's admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident 2 on 6/20/2018 and readmitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including epilepsy (a brain condition that causes recurring seizures[a sudden, uncontrolled burst of electrical activity in the brain]), and chronic respiratory failure ( a condition in which your lungs have a hard time loading your blood with oxygen or removing carbon dioxide). A review of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-23 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement accident risk and hazard interventions for two of five sampled residents (Residents 2 and 20). These deficient practices had the potential to place Residents 2 and 20 at risk for injuries. Findings: a. A review of Resident 2's admission Record (Face Sheet) indicated the facility admitted the resident on 6/20/2018, and readmitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including epilepsy (a brain condition that causes recurring seizures[a sudden, uncontrolled burst of electrical activity in the brain]), and chronic respiratory failure ( a condition in which your lungs have a hard time loading your blood with oxygen or removing carbon dioxide). A review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS - a standardized assessment and care screening tool) dated 5/2/2024, indicated Resident 2's cognition was severely impaired (never/rarely made decisions) and was totally dependent upon staff for all activities of daily living (ADLs -essential and routine activities…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-23 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to change Resident 2's oxygen tubing every seven days per the residents care plan and physician order for one of three sampled residents (Resident 2). This deficient practice had the potential to cause complications associated with oxygen and mechanical ventilation therapy including infection or respiratory distress. Findings: A review of the admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident 2 on 6/20/2018, and readmitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including epilepsy (a brain condition that causes recurring seizures [a sudden, uncontrolled burst of electrical activity in the brain]), and chronic respiratory failure (a condition in which your lungs have a hard time loading your blood with oxygen or removing carbon dioxide). A review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS - a standardized assessment and screening tool) dated 5/2/2024, indicated Resident 2's cognition was severely impaired (never/rarely made decisions) and was totally dependent…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-23 · tag F0712 — isolated
    Ensure that the resident and his/her doctor meet face-to-face at all required visits.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the physician completed in person visits in a timely manner for one of three sampled residents (Resident 3), by failing to: -Ensure the physician initial face-to-face visit was made by a physician within 30 days after Resident 3s admission. -Ensure Physician visits were alternated with a Nurse Practitioner visits (NP- a nurse who is qualified to treat certain medical conditions without the direct supervision of a doctor) every 60 days after the first 90 days of Resident 3`s admission. These deficient practices had the potential to result in an undetected decline in medical, health, or psychosocial condition and can lead to a delay in necessary care, treatment, and services. Findings: A review of Resident 3's admission Record (Face Sheet) indicated the facility originally admitted the resident on 5/16/2023, and readmitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including epilepsy (a brain condition that causes recurring seizures [a sudden, uncontrolled burst…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-23 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to enforce its own policy related to a safe, sanitary environment and infection control for two of five sampled residents (Resident 10 and 29) by failing to: -Ensure staff members perform hand hygiene between glove changes for Resident 29. -Ensure to label Resident 10's Intravenous catheter (a thin plastic tube inserted into a vein using a needle) and to lock the needleless system after completion of antibiotic infusion. These deficient practices had the potential to transmit infectious microorganisms and increase the risk of infection for Residents 10 and 29. Findings: a. A review of the admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident 29 on 2/23/2024, and re-admitted the resident on 3/28/2024, with diagnoses including sepsis (a life-threatening condition in which the body responds improperly to an infection. The infection-fighting processes turns on the body, causing the organs to work poorly), chronic kidney disease (kidneys are damaged and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-18 · tag F0776 — isolated
    Provide timely, approved x-ray services, or have an agreement with an approved provider to obtain them.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to follow up on insurance authorization to have a modified barium swallow study (MBSS- an exam that looks at how you swallow different liquids and foods using real time x-ray called fluoroscopy) in a timely manner for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1). This deficient practice may have caused a delay in service subsequently causing Resident 1 to become angry and refuse meals. Findings: A review of the facility admission Record indicated Resident 1 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including Hemiplegia and Hemiparesis following Cerebral Infarction affecting the left side (weakness on the left side of the body after a stroke), Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disorder (COPD-condition involving constriction of the airways and or difficulty breathing), Dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), Encounter for Attention to Gastrostomy (g-tube: surgically inserted tube into the stomach through the abdominal wall for feeding), Unspecified severe…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-04 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to conduct a weekly skin evaluation and assessment follow up of the sacrococcyx and left lower leg pressure injury (bedsore, the breakdown of skin integrity due to pressure, occurs when a bony prominence is under persistent contact with an external surface) for one sampled resident (Resident 1). Resident 1 did not receive a weekly assessment follow up and debridement on 8/31/2023 to evaluate the pressure injuries. This deficient practice caused an increased risk in harm to the resident. Findings: A review of the medical record indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including chronic respiratory failure, dependence on ventilator, end stage renal disease, gastrostomy, anemia in chronic kidney disease, dependence on renal dialysis and diabetes mellitus, dysphagia, and unstageable and peripheral vascular disease (PVD). According to a review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS - a standardized assessment…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-04-01 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the environment remained free of accident hazards for four of 28 sampled residents (Resident 32, 46, 108, and 56) by failing to: -Ensure the wheelchair brakes were locked while assisting Resident 46 with transfers from standing to sitting in the wheelchair. -Prevent Resident 32 from slipping out of the wheelchair while wearing ankle foot orthoses (AFO, brace applied to the leg to hold the foot and ankle in the correct position). -Remove an unsecured television from Resident 108's rolling bedside table. -Post appropriate signage outside Resident 56's doorway to indicate the presence of oxygen in accordance with the facility's policy. These deficient practices had the potential to result in injury to the residents and place the facility at risk for fire hazards. Findings: a. A review of Resident 46's Facesheet (admission record), dated 3/30/2022, indicated Resident 46 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-04-01 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — pattern
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure six of six Restorative Nursing Aides (RNA, nursing aide program that helps residents to maintain their function and joint mobility) demonstrated competency for the provision of range of motion (ROM, full movement potential of a joint) exercises. One of six RNAs did not provide adequate passive range of motion (PROM, movement of a joint through the range of motion with no effort from resident) exercises to one of 16 sampled residents (Resident 42). This deficient practice had the potential for 47 residents with physician's orders for RNA services to receive ROM exercises to experience a decline in ROM, which increased the likelihood of developing contractures (chronic loss of joint motion associated with deformity and joint stiffness). Cross reference F688 Findings: A review of Resident 42's admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident 42 on 11/15/2021 with diagnoses including chronic respiratory failure (airways carrying air to lungs become narrow and damaged, limiting air movement in the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-04-01 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store food under sanitary conditions and maintain the kitchen in a sanitary manner as evidenced by: -Food products stored past labeled use by dates. -Unlabeled plastic bag with hot dogs in kitchen freezer. -Kitchen floor with dirty particles, dust, and white substance. These deficient practices caused an increased risk to cross-contaminate food with pathogens (germs) that could expose residents receiving food from the kitchen; and place them at risk for developing food borne illness (food poisoning) leading to symptoms including an upset stomach, stomach cramps, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, and fever which can lead to hospitalization and/or death. Findings: During an observation of the kitchen's walk-in refrigerator, on 3/29/2022 at 8:53 a.m., during the initial tour of the kitchen, a plastic jar of 1/8 Crinkle-Cut thin dill chips was labeled with an open date of 5/3/2021. The use by date indicated 10/29/2021 was observed. During a concurrent interview, the Dietary Supervisor (DS) confirmed the use by date was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-04-01 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility did not implement appropriate infection control practices to prevent the transmission of communicable diseases by failing to: a. Ensure staff had access to a handwashing station in Resident 58 room, who was currently under transmission-based precautions (the second tier of basic infection control and are to be used in addition to Standard Precautions for patients who may be infected or colonized with certain infectious agents for which additional precautions are needed to prevent infection transmission). b. Properly disinfect a cloth gait belt (assistive device placed around a person's waist to assist with safe transferring between surfaces or while walking) and front wheeled walker (FWW, an assistive device with two front wheels used for stability when walking) between residents' use for Resident 53, 26, and 46. These deficient practices had the potential to transmit infectious microorganisms and increase the risk of infection for residents and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-04-01 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide resident with dignity and respect by not sitting when assisting the resident with meal and eating at eye-level for one of 28 sampled residents (Resident 22). This deficient practice had the potential for Resident 22 to feel less respected as a person, which could negatively impact the resident's sense of dignity. Findings: A review of Resident 22's admission Record indicated the facility re-admitted Resident 22 on 11/18/2021, with diagnoses including seizure disorder (burst of uncontrolled electrical activity between brain cells that causes temporary abnormalities in muscle tone or movements like stiffness, twitching or limpness) and gastroesophageal reflux disease (digestive disorder that occurs when acidic stomach juices, or food and fluids back up from the stomach into the throat). A review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS, a standardized assessment and care screening tool), dated 1/12/2022, indicated Resident 22's cognitive skills of daily decision making were moderately impaired but required limited…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-04-01 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the residents health information was protected by not posting a sign above each resident's bed disclosing medical information regarding their dialysis access for two of three sampled residents (Resident 18 and Resident 42). This deficient practice had the potential of exposing residents medical information to staff who were not providing care to these resident and to visitors. Findings: a. A review of Resident 18's admission Record (Face Sheet) indicated the facility originally admitted the resident on 12/14/2021, and readmitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including chronic respiratory failure (inability to breath effectively) and end stage renal (inability of the kidney to remove waste product from the blood stream) disease. A review of Resident 18's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a standardized assessment and care screening tool), dated 3/20/2022, indicated Resident 18's cognitive skills of daily decision making were severely impaired and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-04-01 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a homelike environment with adequate lighting for two of 28 sampled residents (Resident 22 and 32). This deficient practice had the potential to place Resident 22 and 32 at risk for choking hazards while being assisted with meals and decreased the residents' alertness to adequately eat, which increases their potential for weight loss. Findings: a. A review of Resident 32's admission Record indicated the facility re-admitted Resident 32 on 4/24/2019. Resident 32's diagnoses included but was not limited to gastroesophageal reflux disease [digestive disorder that occurs when acidic stomach juices, or food and fluids back up from the stomach into the throat), acute embolism and thrombosis (types of blood vessel blockage) of deep veins in the lower extremity (leg), and dependence on wheelchair. A review of Resident 32's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a standardized assessment and care -screening took), dated 1/30/2022, indicated Resident 32's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-04-01 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolated
    Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide one of 28 sampled residents (Resident 32) with care and services to maintain the ability to perform activities of daily living (ADLs, tasks related to personal care) by failing to: -dress Resident 32 in appropriate clothes and assist Resident 32 out-of-bed daily in accordance with the care plan and the facility's policy, and -provide Resident 32 with a Restorative Nursing Aide (RNA, nursing aide program that helps residents to maintain their function and joint mobility) feeding program in accordance with the physician's order. These deficient practices had the potential for Resident 32 to experience a decline in overall function, endurance, strength, and mental health, which affects the resident's quality of life. Cross reference F805 Findings: A review of Resident 32's admission Record indicated the facility re-admitted Resident 32 on 4/24/2019 with diagnoses including gastroesophageal reflux disease (digestive disorder that occurs when acidic stomach juices, or food and fluids back up from the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-04-01 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to endure residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards for three of eight sampled residents (Residents 2, 11, and 58). The physician's orders were not followed these residents causing an increased risk in worsening pressure related skin injuries and the potential for increased harm and infection. Findings: A review of Resident 2's Face sheet indicated Resident 2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Chronic Respiratory Failure (condition that results in the inability to effectively exchange carbon dioxide and oxygen, and induces chronically low oxygen levels or chronically high carbon dioxide levels), Tracheostomy (opening surgically created through the neck into the trachea (windpipe) to allow direct access to the breathing tube) status, Pressure induced deep tissue damage (serious form of pressure ulcer caused by direct pressure to the skin and soft tissue that causes ischemia) of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-04-01 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide one of 16 sampled residents (Resident 42) with: -appropriate passive range of motion exercises (PROM, movement of a joint through the range of motion with no effort from resident) and -equipment to prevent further range of motion (ROM, full movement potential of a joint) loss in the left leg. These deficient practices placed Resident 42 at increased risk for the development of contractures (chronic loss of joint motion associated with deformity and joint stiffness), which could lead to increased pain. Cross reference F726 Findings: a. A review of Resident 42's admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident 42 on 11/15/2021 with diagnoses including chronic respiratory failure (airways carrying air to lungs become narrow and damaged, limiting air movement in the body), dependence on ventilator (machine that mechanically assists with breathing), dependent on renal dialysis (process of filtering blood), dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), encounter for attention to gastrostomy (G-tube, tube…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-04-01 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to: -Ensure unopened insulin (a medication used to control high blood sugar) was stored in the refrigerator per the manufacturer's requirements for one of three inspected medication carts (Sub-Acute Medication Cart 3) affecting Resident 57. -Remove expired insulin from one of three inspected medication carts (Sub-Acute Medication Cart 4) affecting Resident 18. These deficient practices increased the risk that Residents 18 and Resident 57 could have received medication that had become ineffective or toxic due to improper storage possibly leading to health complications resulting in hospitalization or death. Findings: During an observation on [DATE] at 2:11 PM of the Sub-Acute Medication Cart 3, with the Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN 5), the following medications were found either expired, stored in a manner contrary to their respective manufacturer's requirements, or not labeled with an open date as required by their respective manufacturer's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-04-01 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide an appropriate meal for one of 28 sampled residents (Resident 32). Resident 32 consistently coughed during three meal observations which was not reported to nursing. This deficient practice placed Resident 32 at increased risk for aspiration. Cross reference F676 Findings: A review of Resident 32's admission Record indicated the facility re-admitted Resident 32 on 4/24/2019 with diagnoses including dysphagia (difficulty swallowing) gastroesophageal reflux disease (digestive disorder that occurs when acidic stomach juices, or food and fluids back up from the stomach into the throat), acute embolism and thrombosis (types of blood vessel blockage) of deep veins in the lower extremity (leg) and dependence on wheelchair. A review of Resident 32's Physician's Order, dated 4/24/2019, indicated to provide a regular, mechanical soft (texture modified for people with chewing or swallowing difficulties) fortified diet (diet enhanced to increase caloric intake), with hot chocolate at breakfast and lunch. A review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
MODI, RUSHABHIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST50%since 02/10/2016
MODI, SHRUTIIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST50%since 02/10/2016
AUSTRIA, ELIZABETHIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/10/2016
PARIKH, SAGARIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICERsince 09/01/2015
BRINLEY, BRITTANYIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/01/2021
DELMO, AILEENIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 09/01/2021
PEREZ, EMMAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 11/19/2018

CMS files one row per role, so the 12 rows in the source record cover these 7 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$11.5M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-6.7%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 2%Medicare 4%Other / private 95%

A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$597per resident / day
operating cost
$18,137per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$559per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in California
$12,167/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$15,178/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,000/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 056242. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-07-18, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next