Granada Post Acute
3565 E Imperial Hwy, Lynwood, CA 90262 · For profit - Partnership · 98 certified beds · (310) 638-9377 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home’s record is mixed — some reassuring signs, some worth asking about.
- a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (44) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 3 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 3 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 3 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 3 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 2 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 3 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 2 to 4 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 31.8% | 10.2% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 4.2% | 4.0% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 2.0% | 0.8% | 0.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 1.2% | 1.2% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 11.0% | 7.3% | 6.5% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.4% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 1.5% | 1.6% | 3.3% | typical for the state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 16.8% | 9.8% | 16.1% | typical |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 14.9% | 13.7% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 98.9% | 98.2% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 12.0% | 4.3% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 1.7% | 10.2% | 21.2% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 21.5% | 12.0% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 1.7% | 1.5% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 84.1% | 93.2% | 79.4% | typical |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 27.8% | 23.0% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 5.8% | 11.2% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 3.81 | 2.25 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 0.56 | 1.57 | 1.80 | better |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
34.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 119 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 60.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 145 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.69 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 92% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 22% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 34.9%CMS range 26.9–45.0 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | worse than U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.7%CMS range 7.9–14.2 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 60.0% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 63.5% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 55.9% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 63.3% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 98.5% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 65.2% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.7% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 9.3%CMS range 6.6–12.1 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.60 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 98 beds and averages 90.9 residents a day — about 93% occupied, or roughly 7 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.25 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.42 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.60 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.90 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.40 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.46 to 0.32 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 45% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
44 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 34 are one tap away and print in full.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-06-18 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, facility failed to ensure the low-temperature dishwashing machine reached the required sanitizing water temperature of 120 degrees Fahrenheit (F, unit of temperature) prior to washing soiled dishes, and ensure dietary staff adhered to proper food safety practices when a cook was observed performing meal preparation without a beard net. These failures had the potential to result in improperly sanitized dishware and food contamination, which could increase the risk of foodborne illness, cross-contamination, and the transmission of infectious organisms potentially affecting all residents receiving meals and food services from the facility. Findings: 1. During a concurrent observation and interview on 6/15/2026 at 8:24 a.m., with the Dietary Assistant Supervisor (DAS), the low-temperature dishwashing machine was observed in operation and actively washing dishware. The machine's temperature gauge was observed with a buildup of dried water residue on the thermometer, obstructing the visibility of the temperature reading. Once the residue…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-06-18 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — patternSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure repositioning and turning documentation was completed timely and accurately for five out of five sampled residents (Resident 32, Resident 7, Resident 95, Resident 4, and Resident 64). These failures resulted in documentation that could not be relied upon to verify care and services provided for Residents 32, 7, 95, 4, and 64. Cross reference F686.Findings: a. During a review of Resident 32's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 32 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted [DATE]. Resident 32's diagnoses included muscle weakness, contracture (a stiffening/shortening at any joint, that reduces the joint's range of motion) of the left and right lower leg, unstageable pressure ulcer (a severe wound where the true depth and tissue damage cannot be seen because it is completely obscured by dead tissue) of the sacral region (near tailbone), and gastrostomy (a surgical opening fitted with a device…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-18 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolatedPrevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure behavior episodes and the number of hours of sleep were monitored for two of five sampled residents (Resident 2 and Resident 11) receiving psychotropic medication (any drug that changes brain function resulting in alteration to mood, thoughts, feelings or behavior).These failures had the potential to place Resident 2 and 11 at risk for unnecessary psychotropic medication use and unidentified and unaddressed changes in behavior.Findings:1. During a review of Resident 2's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Resident 2's diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disorder (COPD, a chronic lung disease causing difficulty in breathing), pneumonia (an infection/inflammation in the lungs), and schizophrenia (a mental illness that is characterized by disturbances in thought).During a review of Resident 2's History and Physical (H&P) dated 6/4/2026, the H&P…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-18 · tag F0637 — isolatedAssess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set ([MDS]- a resident assessment tool) for a significant change status was completed for one of two sampled residents (Resident 3) after the resident experienced a fall resulting in a fracture (a broken bone) on 1/28/2026. This failure resulted in delayed assessment and delayed transmission of Resident 3's significant change in condition to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS, a federal agency within the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) that administers major healthcare programs) and had the potential to negatively affect the resident's care planning, and delivery of necessary care and services related to the fall and fracture. Cross reference F657Findings: During a review of Resident 3's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident 3's diagnoses included diabetes mellitus (DM- a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-18 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the minimum data set (MDS- a resident assessment tool) was accurately completed for one of one sampled residents (Resident 1), when Resident 1's MDS did not include his active diagnosis of dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities).This failure had the potential to place Resident 1 at risk of not receiving comprehensive care that addressed his diagnosis of dementia.Findings:During a review of Resident 1's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Resident 1's diagnoses included pneumonia (an infection/inflammation in the lungs), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD, a chronic lung disease causing difficulty in breathing), diabetes mellitus (DM- a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound healing), and dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities).During a review of Resident 1's History and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-18 · tag F0645 — isolatedPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR- a federal assessment requirement to help ensure individuals who have a mental disorder or intellectual disabilities are placed in facilities that can provide the appropriate care and referred to special services as needed) Level 2 evaluation was completed for one of one sampled residents (Resident 1).This failure had the potential to result in inappropriate placement and unidentified specialized services for Resident 1.Findings:During a review of Resident 1's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Resident 1's diagnoses included pneumonia (an infection/inflammation in the lungs), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD, a chronic lung disease causing difficulty in breathing), and diabetes mellitus (DM- a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound healing).During a review…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-18 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to revise the care plan for one of two sampled residents (Resident 3) after the resident experienced a fall on 1/28/2026, which resulted in a fracture (a broken bone). This failure had the potential to result in ineffective care, treatment, and services for Resident 3, and placed the resident at increased risk for additional falls, injury, and unmet care needs. Cross reference F637Findings: During a review of Resident 3's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including diabetes mellitus (DM- a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound healing), fracture of the right fibula (calf bone), and muscle weakness (loss of muscle strength). During a review of Resident 3's History and Physical (H&P), dated 10/23/2025, the H&P indicated Resident 3 had the capacity to understand and make decisions. During a review of Resident 3's Minimum Data Set ([MDS]- a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-18 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure two of four staff-dependent sampled residents' (Resident 25 and Resident 39) fingernails were trimmed and maintained in a clean manner. This failure had the potential to result in a negative impact on Resident 25 and Resident 39's quality of life and self-esteem and had the potential to result in sustaining an injury from scratching and developing an infection.Findings: a. During a review of Resident 25's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 25 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Resident 25's diagnoses included hypertension (HTN- high blood pressure), anxiety (a feeling of fear), and muscle weakness (loss of muscle strength). During a review of Resident 25's History and Physical (H&P), dated 2/16/2026, the H&P indicated Resident 25 had fluctuating capacity to understand and make decisions. During a review of Resident 25's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a resident assessment…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-18 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure pressure ulcer (PU- localized damage to the skin and/or underlying tissue usually over a bony prominence) prevention interventions were implemented for two of two sampled residents (Residents 32 and 52), by failing to: 1. Ensure Resident 32 received timely repositioning. 2. Ensure Resident 52's low air mattress (LAM- a mattress designed to distribute body weight over a broad surface area to help prevent skin breakdown) was set according to the resident's weight. These failures had the potential to place Residents 32 and 52 at risk for pressure ulcer development and/or worsening skin integrity. Findings: a. During a review of Resident 32's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 32 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted [DATE]. Resident 32's diagnoses included muscle weakness, contracture (a stiffening/shortening at any joint, that reduces the joint's range of motion) of the left and right…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-18 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement and follow physician orders for orthostatic blood pressure (the measurement of blood pressure changes that occur from a sitting or lying position to a standing position) monitoring and recording for one of three sampled residents (Residents 24). This failure had the potential to place Resident 24 at risk for undetected orthostatic hypotension, dizziness, syncope (fainting), falls, injury, delayed medical intervention, and adverse cardiovascular complications related to changes in blood pressure upon position changes.Findings: During a review of Resident 24's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident 24 on 2/14/2024. Resident 24's diagnoses included depressive disorder (a serious mood disorder characterized by a persistent low mood, loss of interest and low energy, lasting at least two weeks), muscle weakness, dysphagia (difficulty in swallowing), hepatic encephalopathy (a serious decline in brain function due to severe liver disease), hypotension (low blood…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 34 citations
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-18 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a Urologist (medical doctor who specializes in treating diseases of the urinary tract in both men and women, as well as the male reproductive system) was consulted in a timely manner as ordered on 1/19/2026, and upon readmission to the facility on 2/20/2026 for one of one sampled residents (Resident 5) with an indwelling catheter (a thin, flexible tube inserted into the bladder to drain urine). This failure had the potential to place Resident 5 at risk for indwelling catheter related complications such as urinary tract infections (UTI- an infection in the bladder/urinary tract) and sepsis (a life-threatening blood infection).Findings: During a review of Resident 5's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Resident 5's diagnoses included hydronephrosis (swelling of a kidney caused by a backup of urine), hypertension (HTN-high blood pressure), presence of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-18 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the consultant pharmacist's Medication Regimen Review (MRR- a thorough evaluation of the medication regimen of a resident, with the goal of promoting positive outcomes and minimizing adverse consequences and potential risks associated with medication, to the physician) recommendation was reviewed, addressed, and followed up with the physician for pain management therapy and non-pharmacological interventions for one of two sampled residents (Resident 3). This failure had the potential to affect Resident 3's pain management, comfort, and quality of care.Findings: During a review of Resident 3's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including diabetes mellitus (DM- a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound healing), fracture of the right fibula (calf bone), and muscle weakness (loss of muscle strength). During a review of Resident 3's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-18 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolatedEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow the menu and standardized recipes for one of four sampled residents (Resident 31).This failure had the potential for affecting Resident 31's meal satisfaction. FindingsDuring a review of Resident 31's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the facility admitted the resident on 3/13/2026 with diagnoses including diabetes mellitus (DM - a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound healing), muscle weakness (loss of muscles strength), and hypertension (HTN-high blood pressure).During a review of Resident 31's History of Physical (H&P), dated 3/16/2026, the H&P indicated Resident 31 could make needs known but cannot make medical decisions.During a review of Resident 31's Minimum Data Set (MDS- a resident assessment tool), dated 4/6/2026, the MDS indicated Resident 31's cognition (the ability to understand and process information) was intact. The MDS indicated Resident 31 was dependent (helper does all the effort) on staff for activities of daily living (ADLs -…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-12 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to timely develop a comprehensive care plan for one out of three sampled residents (Resident 1), who refused to wear a hearing aid (a small electronic device worn in or behind the ear to amplify [increase] sounds, designed to help people with hearing loss).This failure had the potential for miscommunication and Resident 1's needs not being met. Findings:During a review of Resident 1's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. The admission Record indicated Resident 1's diagnoses included systolic (congestive) heart failure ([CHF], a heart disorder that causes the heart to not pump the blood efficiently, sometimes resulting in leg swelling).During a review of Resident 1's care plan titled, Resident has difficulty hearing staff, dated 11/9/2022, the care plan indicated Resident 1 received hearing aids. The care plan goal indicated for Resident 1 to be able to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-12 · tag F0685 — isolatedAssist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure two of three sampled residents (Residents 1 and 2), received proper treatment and assistive devices to maintain hearing abilities by failing to:Assist Resident 1 when the resident reported her hearing aids did not work properlyAssist Resident 2 when the resident reported he had concerns with hearing and ensure Resident 2 was assessed by the Otolaryngologist ([ENT doctor] specializing in the care for ear, nose and throat conditions) routinely.These failures had the potential for Residents 1 and 2 not being able to hear adequately during conversations with staff and other residents and could lead to misunderstanding or miscommunication between the residents and staff. Findings:During a review of Resident 1's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. The admission Record indicated Resident 1's diagnoses included systolic (congestive) heart failure…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-22 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive, person-centered care plan for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) who had a diagnosis of osteopenia (a decrease in bone mineral density and causes bones to get weaker). This deficient practice had the potential for staff not to properly care for Resident 1 and placed the resident at risk for further injuries and fractures (broken bone). Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 1 was originally admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Resident 1's diagnoses included fracture, contracture (a permanent tightening of the muscles, tendons, skin, and nearby tissues that caused the joints to shorten and become very stiff) and other specified disorders of bone density and structure of the right shoulder. During a review of Resident 1's History and Physical (H&P), dated 1/14/2025, the H&P indicated Resident 1 did not have the capacity to understand and make…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-27 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set (MDS, a resident assessment tool) assessments for three of 19 sampled residents (Residents 23, 19, and 24) were completed and documented accurately. This deficient practice resulted in the transmission of inaccurate data to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) regarding Residents 23, 19, and 24's health status. This deficient practice also created the potential for Residents 23, 19, and 24 to not receive the care and interventions needed to reach their highest practicable physical and psychosocial well-being. Findings: 1. During a review of Resident 23's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 23 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident 23's admitting diagnoses included oropharyngeal phase dysphagia (swallowing problems occurring in the mouth and/or the throat). During a review of Resident 23's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a resident assessment tool), dated 3/6/2025, the MDS…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-27 · tag F0645 — isolatedPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure an accurate Level I Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR, a screening tool that helps identify possible serious mental illness [SMI], and if the resident requires specialized services) was submitted for one of four sampled residents (Resident 74). This deficient practice placed Resident 74 at risk of not receiving recommended or required treatments for diagnosed SMIs, or appropriate placement in a facility to meet Resident 74's needs. Findings: During a review of Resident 74's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 74 was admitted on [DATE] and was most recently readmitted on [DATE]. Resident 74's admitting diagnoses included psychosis (a severe mental condition in which thought, and emotions are so affected that contact is lost with reality), depression (a common mental health condition characterized by persistent feelings of sadness, hopelessness, and loss of interest or pleasure in activities), and anxiety…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-27 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. During an observation on 3/24/2025 at 10:05 a.m., in Resident 191's room, observed Resident 191 lying in bed receiving supplemental oxygen via a nasal cannula (a small plastic tube, which fits into the person's nostrils for providing supplemental oxygen) at three liters per minute. Observed Resident 191's room did not have an oxygen sign posted outside of the room's doorway. During a review of Resident 191's admission Record, the admission record indicated Resident 191 was initially admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. The admission record indicated the following diagnoses which included Parkinson's (a progressive disease of the nervous system marked by tremor, muscular rigidity, and slow, imprecise movements), acute respiratory failure with hypoxia (when the lungs suddenly fail to adequately provide oxygen to the body, resulting in a dangerously low level of oxygen in the blood), dependence on supplemental oxygen, pneumonia (an infection/inflammation in the lungs), congestive heart failure (CHF - a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-27 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure interventions to prevent the development or worsening of pressure ulcers (PU, localized damage to the skin and/or underlying tissue usually over a bony prominence) were implemented for four of seven sampled residents (Residents 288, 74, 23, and 191) when: 1. Low-air-loss-mattress (LALM, a mattress designed to distribute the patient's body weight over a broad surface area and help prevent skin breakdown) settings were incorrect for Residents 288, 74, and 191. 2. Resident 23 was not provided with a LALM as ordered by the resident's physician. 3. Resident 191's LALM was labeled with the wrong resident's name and weight settings. These deficient practices placed Residents 288, 74, 23, and 191 at risk for the development or worsening condition of existing pressure ulcers. Findings: 1. During an interview on 3/26/2025 at 9:15 a.m., with the Treatment Nurse (TN), the TN stated LALMs created air flow to stabilize pressure within the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-27 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure safety was maintained for one of two sampled residents (Resident 288) by failing to pad Resident 288's siderails. This deficient practice placed Resident 288 at risk for harm and injury. Findings: During a review of Resident 288's admission Record, the admission record indicated Resident 288 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident 288's admitting diagnoses included epilepsy (a neurological condition characterized by recurrent seizures [a sudden, uncontrolled electrical disturbance in the brain which can cause uncontrolled jerking, blank stares, and loss of consciousness]). During a review of Resident 288's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a resident assessment tool), dated 3/8/2025, the MDS indicated Resident 288 had severe cognitive impairment (a significant decline in cognitive abilities that interferes with daily functioning and daily living). The MDS indicated Resident 288 had impairments to her lower extremities (legs) on both…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-27 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to place oxygen signage at the room door entrance indicating oxygen was in use for one of six sampled residents (Resident 191) receiving oxygen therapy. This deficient practice had the potential to place all residents' and staff's safety at risk. Findings: During an observation on 3/24/2025 at 10:05 a.m., in Resident 191's room, observed Resident 191 lying in bed receiving supplemental oxygen via nasal cannula (a small plastic tube, which fits into the person's nostrils for providing supplemental oxygen) at three (3) liters per minute (LMP). Observed Resident 191's room did not have an oxygen sign posted outside of the doorway. During a review of Resident 191's admission Record, the admission record indicated Resident 191 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Resident 191's diagnoses included Parkinson's (a progressive disease of the nervous system marked by tremor, muscular rigidity, and slow, imprecise…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-27 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure their medication error rate was less than five percent (%) when Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 1 failed to administer one of four randomly selected residents' (Resident 4) medications timely and as ordered by Resident 4's physician. The outcome was six medication errors out of 32 opportunities for errors, with resulted in a Medication Administration Error Rate of 18.75%, based on the following: 1. Resident 4 received six medications, Lidocaine cream (medication applied to the skin to prevent or treat pain), empagliflozin (hypoglycemic medication used to lower blood sugar levels), benztropine (anti-tremor medication), primidone (anticonvulsant medication used to treat seizure disorders [a sudden, uncontrolled electrical disturbance in the brain which can cause uncontrolled jerking, blank stares, and loss of consciousness]), carbidopa-levodopa (anti-tremor medication), and docusate sodium (a stool softener), more than one hour after…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-27 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolatedEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a daily menu and offer alternative menu options for one of eight sampled residents (Resident 3). This deficient practice had the potential to impact Resident 3's nutritional status, quality of life and result in food dissatisfaction leading to insufficient food intake. Findings: During a review of Resident 3's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident 3's diagnoses included muscle wasting (weakening, shrinking, and loss of muscle) and atrophy (decreased size of a body part, cell, organ or tissue), dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), aphasia (a disorder that makes it difficult to speak) following cerebral infarction (stroke - loss of blood flow to a part of the brain), and severe protein-calorie malnutrition (inadequate intake of protein, calories and other essential nutrients). During a review of Resident 3's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a resident assessment tool),…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-28 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff were knowledgeable of the facility's process on how to handle unlabeled resident clothes found in the laundry area and failed to complete a resident belonging list upon readmission for one of seven sampled resident's (Resident 1), to protect the resident's property from loss or theft. This failure had the potential to violate Resident 1's right to a safe and home like environment. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Record, the admission record indicated Resident 1 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnosis of encephalopathy (a group of conditions that cause brain dysfunction such as confusion and memory loss), after being sent out to a general acute care hospital on 7/16/2024. During a review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set ([MDS], a federally mandated resident assessment tool) dated 2/14/2025, the MDS indicated Resident 1 had moderate (average) cognitive impairment…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-28 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement its policy and procedures (P&P) titled, Comprehensive Care Planning, and Falls by a Resident, for one of seven residents (Resident 2) who had a fall on 2/19/2025, by failing to: 1. Conduct an Interdisciplinary Team ([IDT] group of healthcare professionals, including resident/ resident representative, working together to provide residents with needed care) meeting with Resident 2 and the family representative, to discuss and revise (change) the plan of care after Resident 2's fall on 2/19/2025. 2. Reassess and revise care plan interventions to ensure Resident 2's safety and to prevent recurrent fall. These failures placed Resident 2 at risk for recurrent falls and injuries. Findings: During a review of Resident 2's admission Record, the admission Record indicated, Resident 2 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Resident 2's diagnoses included polyneuropathy (a condition where multiple nerves in the body…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-11 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to implement its infection prevention and control measures for five out of seven residents (Residents 1, 2, 3, 6, and 7) by failing to: a. Ensure Residents 1 and 3 were not cohorted (grouped together) with a resident (Resident 2) who had orders for contact isolation (a set of precautions used to prevent the spread of germs that can be transmitted by direct or indirect contact with a patient or their environment). b. Ensure clear signage was posted to inform staff and visitors the Enhanced Barrier Precautions ([EBP] use of gown and gloves during high-contact resident care activities to reduce the transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms ([MDROs] bacteria or other microorganism resistant to multiple classes of antibiotics)) that were to be implemented when providing care for Residents 6 and 7. c. Ensure staff wore personal protective equipment ([PPE] specialized clothing or equipment such as gloves and gown worn to minimize exposure to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-15 · tag F0660 — isolatedPlan the resident's discharge to meet the resident's goals and needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow up and ensure all required documents were sent to the General Acute Care Hospital (GACH) Rehabilitation (Rehab) Center for evaluation, to address one of three sampled residents (Resident 1), requested transfer. This deficient practice resulted to the delay in transfer and physical therapies in a GACH Rehab and had the potential to affect in maintaining Resident 1 ' s highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. Findings: During a review of Resident 1 ' s admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including hemiplegia and hemiparesis (weakness or paralysis on one side of the body), muscle weakness (loss of muscle strength), and difficulty in walking (gait disorders). During a review of Resident 1 ' s History and Physical (H&P), the H&P dated 1/15/2024, indicated Resident 1 did not have the mental capacity to understand and make medical decisions. During…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-03-29 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — widespreadAdminister the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the Administrator failed to demonstrate or provide evidence of sufficient oversight over the activities of the facility's Medical Doctor (MD 1), who also served as the facility's Medical Director. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all 90 facility residents as the Medical Director was responsible for providing adequate oversight to ensure care and services provided for the 90 in-house residents in the facility met professional standards of quality. Cross Reference: F-tag F658, F552, F758, and F841 Findings: During an interview on 3/29/2024 at 1:56 p.m., with the Administrator (ADM), the ADM stated he had been the facility ADM since 2/2024 and stated Medical Doctor (MD) 1 was already serving as the medical director prior to his assumption of the ADM role. The ADM stated he was not made aware by MD 1 of any systemic facility issues when he assumed the role. The ADM further stated he was unaware of any concerns related to psychotropic medications (medications that affect the mind, emotions, and behavior) and informed consents. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-03-29 · tag F0841 — widespreadDesignate a physician to serve as medical director responsible for implementation of resident care policies and coordination of medical care in the facility.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, Medical Doctor (MD) 1, who also served as the facility's Medical Director, failed to follow the facility's policies and procedure outlining the responsibilities of the Medical Director. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all 90 facility residents due to a lack of facility staff oversight, and the potential for unidentified resident care concerns. Cross Reference: F-tag F658, F552, F758, and F835 Findings: During an interview on 3/29/2024 at 1:56 p.m., with the facility Administrator (ADM), the ADM stated he had been the ADM since 2/2024, and stated MD 1 was already serving as the Medical Director when he assumed the role. The ADM stated MD 1 had not reported any issues to him related to the findings identified by the survey team. The ADM stated MD 1, in the role of Medical Director, was responsible for overseeing the other physicians and advanced practice providers (APP, a health care provider who is not a physician but who performs medical activities typically performed by a physician, most commonly nurse practitioners or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-03-29 · tag F0552 — patternEnsure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to: 1. Obtain informed consent, per its policy and procedure, prior to the initiation and administration of psychotropics (medications that affect the mind, emotions, and behavior) for four of 17 sampled residents (Residents 75, 40, 82, and 20). 2. Ensure that facility staff were aware of the facility policy and procedure for obtaining informed consent prior to the initiation and administration of psychotherapeutic medications (psychotropics). These deficient practices placed Residents 75, 40, 82, and 20 at risk for avoidable harm from unwanted adverse effects (a harmful and undesired effect resulting from a medication or intervention) related to psychotropic medication use. The above failures also removed the residents' rights to make decisions about the care and treatments they received in the facility. Cross Reference: F-tag F658 Findings 1. During a review of Resident 75's admission Record, the record indicated Resident 75 was admitted to the facility…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-03-29 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — patternEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, facility staff failed to ensure the care provided met professional standards for nine of 17 sampled residents (Residents 75, 82, 200, 94, 40, 20, 3, 13, and 60) when the following occurred: 1. Informed consents were not obtained per the facility's policy and procedure prior to the initiation of psychotropic medications for Residents 75, 40, 82, and 20. 2. Psychiatric care provided to Residents 75, 82, 200, 94, 40, 20, 3, 13, and 60 under Medical Doctor (MD) 2 (facility psychiatrist) and Nurse Practitioner (NP) 1 was not regularly overseen or monitored by the facility Medical Director (MD 1) for potential concerns or compliance with facility policies and procedures. 3. Performance of MD 1, serving as the facility's Medical Director, was not overseen by the facility Administrator (ADM). These deficient practices removed Resident 75, 40, 82, and 20's rights to make decisions related to their care and placed the residents at risk for avoidable harm from unwanted adverse effects…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-03-29 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — patternImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff initiated the administration of psychotherapeutic (also called psychotropics, medications that affect the mind, emotions, and behavior) for eight of 17 sampled residents (Residents 75, 82, 200, 94, 40, 3, 13, and 60) without behavioral justification to warrant the necessity of the medications. This deficient practice placed Residents 75, 82, 200, 94, 40, 3, 13, and 60 at risk for avoidable harm from unwanted adverse effects (a harmful and undesired effect resulting from a medication or intervention) related to psychotherapeutic medication use. Findings 1. During a review of Resident 75's admission Record, the record indicated Resident 75 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with admitting diagnoses that included transient cerebral ischemic attack (a brief blockage of blood flow to the brain). The admission record further indicated a new diagnosis of bipolar disorder (a mental illness that causes unusual shifts in a person's mood, energy,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-29 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to date food items for 89 out of 95 residents. This deficient practice had the potential to cause food borne illnesses (food poisoning, any illness resulting from the food spoilage of contaminated food, pathogenic bacteria, viruses, or parasites that contaminate food, as well as toxins) for 89 out of the 95 residents receiving food items from the facility. Findings: During an observation on 3/18/2024, at 8:22 a.m., in Refrigerator 1, pork sausage was dated 3/4 (March 4 th), with no year and no expiration date indicated. Freezer 2 had a box of beef and vegetable enchiladas dated 4/30 (April 30th), with no year indicated. During a concurrent observation and interview on 3/18/2024, at 8:45 a.m., of the facility's freezer, the freezer 5 had 15 single unit popsicles and ice cream that were undated, two of the wrapped popsicles and ice cream were stuck together and the plastic wrap was sticky. During an interview on 3/18/2024, at 9:09 a.m., with the Dietary Manager (DM), the DM stated he did not see or find any dates…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-29 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the call light was within reach for one of 20 sampled residents (Resident 94). This deficient practice had the potential to cause avoidable harm to Resident 94 from an inability to call staff for assistance and the potential for falls and associated injuries. Cross Reference F-tag F656. Findings: During a review of Resident 94's admission Record, the record indicated the facility admitted Resident 94 on 2/13/2024. Resident 94's admitting diagnoses included difficulty walking, generalized muscle weakness, unsteadiness on his feet, and history of falling. During a review of Resident 94's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a standardized assessment and care screening/planning tool), dated 2/17/2024, the MDS indicated Resident 94 required substantial to maximal assistance from staff when transferring between surfaces, and when transitioning from a sitting to standing position, a sitting to lying position, or a lying to sitting position. During a review of Resident 94's medical record titled, Fall Risk Assessment, dated 2/13/2024,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-29 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, facility staff failed to implement or develop a resident-specific care plan for three of 20 sampled residents (Resident 40, Resident 94, and Resident 30) when the following occurred: 1. Resident 40's care plan did not indicate the level of assistance he required for eating and drinking. 2. Resident 94's care plans indicated his call light needed to be within reach, and Resident 94's call light was observed hanging behind his bed and not within reach. 3. Resident 30's care plan did not indicate a physician ordered medical appointment. These deficient practices placed Resident 40 at risk of not receiving his required level of assistance while eating and drinking, creating the potential for avoidable weight loss, dehydration, or complications such as aspiration (when food, liquid, or other material enters a person's airway and eventually the lungs by accident). These deficient practices also placed Resident 94 at risk of being unable to call for help, creating the avoidable…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-29 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff were aware of the level of assistance required by one of two sampled residents (Resident 40) for completion of activities of daily living (ADLs, activities related to personal care, including bathing or showering, dressing, getting in and out of bed or a chair, walking, using the toilet, and eating). This deficient practice placed Resident 40 at risk of not receiving his required level of assistance while eating and drinking, creating the potential for Resident 40 to experience avoidable weight loss and dehydration, or complications such as aspiration (when food, liquid, or other material enters a person's airway and eventually the lungs by accident). Cross Reference F-tag F656 Findings: During a review of Resident 40's admission Record, the record indicated the facility admitted Resident 40 on 8/19/2019, and most recently re-admitted Resident 40 on 3/12/2024. Resident 40's admitting diagnoses included muscle wasting and atrophy (decrease in size or wasting away of a body part or tissue), protein-calorie…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-29 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain the nutritional status of one out of four residents (Resident 29) by not ensuring the registered dietitian (RD, health professional who has special training in diet and nutrition) recommendations were implemented for Resident 29. This deficient practice had the potential to cause further avoidable weight loss and malnutrition (lack of sufficient nutrients in the body) for Resident 29. Findings: During a review of Resident 29's admission Record, the record indicated Resident 29 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and most recently re-admitted on [DATE]. Resident 29's admitting diagnoses included diabetes mellitus (elevated blood sugar levels), severe protein-calorie malnutrition, and adult failure to thrive (a syndrome of weight loss, decreased appetite and poor nutrition, and inactivity, often accompanied by dehydration, depressive symptoms, impaired immune function, and low cholesterol). During a review of Resident 29's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-29 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolatedEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff accurately and thoroughly completed Resident 7's Intake and Output Weekly Assessments. This deficient practice placed Resident 7 at risk for avoidable fluid balance problems, such as dehydration or hypervolemia (a condition in which the liquid portion of the blood [plasma] is too high). Findings: During a review of Resident 7's admission Record, the record indicated the facility admitted Resident 7 on 4/12/2022, and most recently re-admitted Resident 7 on 2/26/2024. Resident 7's admitting diagnoses included neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder (lack of bladder control due to brain, spinal cord, or nerve problems), hydronephrosis (excess fluid in a kidney due to a backup of urine), generalized swelling, congestive heart failure (CHF, a chronic condition where the heart does not pump blood as well as it should), hypo-osmolality (where the levels of electrolytes, proteins, and nutrients in the blood are lower than normal) and hyponatremia…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-29 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to administer artificial tears drops (for dry eyes) on time for one out of three residents (Resident 79) according to their policies and procedures. This deficient practice had the potential to result in Resident 79's discomfort and worsening of dry eyes. Findings: During a review of Resident 79's admission Record, the record indicated the facility admitted Resident 79 on 11/1/2023 with admitting diagnoses that included diabetes mellitus (a group of diseases that result in too much sugar in the blood) and glaucoma (a group of eye conditions that can cause blindness from too much pressure on the nerve connecting the eye to the brain). During a review of Resident 79's History and Physical (H&P), dated 11/3/2023, the H&P indicated Resident 79 had the capacity to understand and make medical decisions. During a review of Resident 79's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a comprehensive assessment and care screening tool), dated 2/6/2024, the MDS indicated Resident 79 was cognitively intact (ability to think and reason). During a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-29 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were not expired in the dialysis (treatment that helps your body remove extra fluid and waste products from the blood) emergency kit (E-kit, a small supply of medications to quickly treat symptoms in an emergency). This deficient practice had the potential to cause contamination and loss of efficacy of the medications in the dialysis E-kit. Findings: During a review of Resident 58's admission Record, dated 3/22/2024, the admission record indicated Resident 58 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with the following diagnoses which included end stage renal disease (ESRD, the last stage of chronic kidney disease [gradual loss of kidney function]), type 2 diabetes mellitus (condition that results in too much sugar circulating in the blood), hypertension (high blood pressure), hyperlipidemia (an abnormally high concentration of fat particles in the blood), and dependence on renal…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-29 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to prevent cross-contamination when placing soiled linens on top of a shared resident surface. This deficient practice had the potential to spread infectious microorganisms to staff and residents. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 3/18/2024, at 9:42 a.m., with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 1, in the shared resident bathroom for room [ROOM NUMBER] and room [ROOM NUMBER], a soiled towel with brown and yellowish residue was observed on top of the toilet. CNA 1 entered the bathroom and picked up the soiled towel. CNA 1 stated she placed the dirty towel there temporarily while she went to get a bag to put it in. CNA 1 stated dirty linens should have gone directly into a plastic bag and not on community surfaces to prevent infection spreading to other residents. During an interview on 3/21/2024, at 8:52 a.m., with the Infection Preventionist Nurse (IPN), the IPN stated linen bags were easily accessible outside of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-29 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that influenza (flu - a very contagious viral infection that affects the nose, throat, and lungs) and pneumococcal (any infection caused by bacteria called Streptococcus pneumoniae) vaccinations (a method used to protect against harmful germs), were offered as required to one of five sampled residents (Resident 83). This deficient practice placed Resident 83 at a higher risk of acquiring the flu and pneumonia (an infection of the lungs caused by bacteria, viruses, or fungi), which could increase the resident's risk of developing serious complications. This deficient practice also had the potential to increase the risk of flu and pneumonia transmission to other residents in the facility. Findings: During a review of Resident 83's admission Record, dated March 21, 2024, the admission record indicated Resident 69 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses which included fracture (break) of the neck and left…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-02 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolatedEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Treatment Nurse (TN) 3 had the specific competencies and skill sets necessary to safely perform a nephrostomy tube (small tube that helped drain urine from kidney) dressing change for one of one sampled resident (Resident 1). This failure resulted in Resident 1 ' s nephrostomy tube being cut, requiring transfer to a general acute care hospital (GACH) and increased the risk for infection and medical complications for the resident. Findings: During a review of Resident 1 ' s admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 1 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including hydronephrosis with renal and ureteral calculous (kidney swelling due to back up of urine), obstructive and reflux uropathy (inability for urine to drain through the urinary tract), and benign prostatic hyperplasia (enlarged prostate). During a review of Resident 1 ' s History and Physical (H&P) dated 12/27/2023, the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| GRANADA HEALTH INC | Organization | DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; GENERAL PARTNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | since 03/01/2017 |
| GRANADA POST ACUTE LP | Organization | DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; LIMITED PARTNERSHIP INTEREST | since 03/01/2017 |
| SCHMUKLER, YEHUDA | Individual | DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; LIMITED PARTNERSHIP INTEREST | since 03/01/2017 |
| ZEMEL, ELLIOT | Individual | DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; LIMITED PARTNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | since 03/01/2017 |
| EDIFY COMPLIANCE LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/01/2025 |
| HANSEN HUNTER LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/01/2025 |
| LTC CONSULTING SERVICES LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/01/2025 |
| MIRACLE MILE PROPERTIES LP | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 03/01/2017 |
| WEISENBERG & CO, A CERTIFIED ACCOUNTANCY COPORATION | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/01/2025 |
| SHTORCH, EYAL | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 09/04/2025 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 32 rows in the source record cover these 10 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
7 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 73% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $102K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in CA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 555348. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-06-18, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.