Legacy Post Acute Care

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

58.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 218 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 52.8% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 159 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.64 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 90% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 12% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 96 beds and averages 73.9 residents a day — about 77% occupied, or roughly 22 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.30 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.73 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.73 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.90 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.46 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.76 to 0.68 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 26% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

17 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 7 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · D2026-04-03 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure timely reporting of an abuse allegation incident, to the California Department of Public Health (CDPH), for one of four sampled residents (Resident 1). This failure interfered with the timely investigation of abuse allegation and had the potential to prevent further abuse.The alleged abuse incident occurred on 2/25/26 at around 6 a.m. and the facility reported the incident to CDPH on 2/26/26 at 8:40 a.m.Findings:During a review of the facility's abuse incident fax report, dated 2/26/26, the fax report indicated that a report to CDPH was faxed on 2/26/26 at 8:40 a.m. regarding an alleged abuse incident involving Resident 1. During a review of Resident 1's face sheet, dated 4/3/26, the face sheet indicated Resident 1 has stage 4 kidney disease (severe kidney failure), anxiety, and dementia (a decline in mental ability severe enough to interfere with daily life, caused by physical changes in the brain).During an interview on 4/2/26 at 11:35 a.m., with Director of Nursing (DON), DON stated the alleged abuse on Resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-04 · tag F0573 — isolated
  Let each resident or the resident's legal representative access or purchase copies of all the resident's records.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide Resident 1's requested copies of medical records in a timely manner when Resident 1 submitted a request for his medical records in January 2025 and did not receive the records until June 2025. This failure resulted in a delay in obtaining Resident 1's medical records. Resident 1 received the medical records from the facility three days before a scheduled court date, which did not allow him sufficient time to prepare and share the information with the judge.Findings:During a record review of Resident 1's admission Record (AR) printed on 12/3/25, the AR indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged on 11/25/2022. During a phone interview on 12/3/25 at 9:24 a.m., Resident 1 stated that in December 2023 he verbally requested copies of his medical records from Administrator (ADM) 1. Resident 1 also stated that in mid-January 2024, he went into the facility and submitted a written request for copies of his medical records…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-09 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review the facility failed ensure that one of six sampled residents' (Resident 69) medical record contained a current copy of Advance Directive (a written instruction, such as a living will or durable power of attorney for health care, recognized under State law relating to the provision of health care when the individual is incapacitated). This failure had the potential for Resident 69 to be placed at risk of receiving unwanted treatment and not receiving appropriate care based on his wishes. Findings: During a review of Resident 69's undated admission Record, the admission Record printed on 1/8/25 indicated, Resident 69 was admitted in the facility 12/2024 with an admission diagnosis of cerebral infarction (a serious condition that occurs when blood flow to the brain is blocked, causing brain tissue to die). During a record review of Resident 69's Minimum Data Set (MDS- an assessment used to guide plan of care) dated 12/9/24, MDS indicated Resident 69's Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS, a scoring system used to determine the resident's cognitive…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-09 · tag F0640 — isolated
  Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility nursing staff did not accurately complete one out of three residents' (Resident 73) discharge assessment when the wrong discharge disposition was entered. This failure to accurately encode (to enter information into the facility MDS software in the computer) Resident 73's assessment had the potential to not effectively monitor and keep track of resident's progress or decline over time and also cause delay in providing resident information for payment and quality measure purposes. Findings: During a review of Resident 73's Face Sheet, (undated), the Face Sheet indicated Resident 73 was admitted to the facility in 2024 with included diagnoses of Acute Osteomyelitis right ankle and foot (osteomyelitis - a serious bone infection that happens after an infection spreads to the bone marrow and bones through bloodstream). During a review of Resident 73's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a resident assessment tool use to guide care) dated 10/12/2024, the MDS…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-09 · tag F0655 — isolated
  Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a written summary of the baseline care plan to one of five sampled residents (Residents 59) when Resident 59 did not receive a copy of the summary. This failure resulted in Resident 59 to be uninformed of the initial plan of care and services. Findings: During a review of Resident 59's undated admission Record, the admission Record printed on 1/8/25 indicated, Resident 59 was admitted in the facility on 12/15/24 with an admission diagnosis of metabolic encephalopathy (a brain dysfunction that occurs when there's an imbalance of chemicals in the blood, usually due to an underlying medical condition.). The record indicated, Resident 59 was their own responsible party (RP or legal guardian). During a record review of Resident 59's Minimum Data Set (MDS- an assessment used to guide plan of care) dated 12/21/24, the MDS indicated Resident 59's Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS, is a scoring system used to determine the resident's cognitive status regarding attention, orientation, and ability to register and recall…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-09 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
  Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to maintain a medication error rate below five percent (5%). During the medication pass on 01/07/25, three medication errors were observed out of twenty-six opportunities for two out of five residents, resulting in an error rate of 11%. This failure had the potential to result in harm in the health and safety of residents. Findings: 1. A review of the manufacturer's insert for Breyna (Budesonide-Formoterol) indicated that Breyna is a medication used to help people with asthma and COPD (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease) breathe easier. The insert emphasizes that it is essential to hold the breath for 10 seconds after administration to ensure the medication is properly absorbed. Omitting this instruction could compromise the medication's effectiveness and potentially impact the resident's treatment outcomes. During an observation on 1/7/25, at 8:15 AM, it was noted that RN1, while administering Breyna to Resident 31, did not instruct the patient to hold their breath for at least 10 seconds after…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-09 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews conducted during the assessment, it was identified that the facility did not maintain the medication refrigerator within the required temperature range of 36°F to 46°F, as outlined in their policy. This failure potentially exposes medications to an environment where their efficacy may be compromised due to improper storage conditions. Findings A review of the facility policy, effective December 1, 2007, titled Storage and Expiration Dates of Medications, Biologicals, Syringes, and Needles, indicates that the facility should ensure that medications are stored at appropriate temperatures. Medications requiring refrigeration should be maintained between 36°F and 46°F. During an observation at 9:21 AM on 01/08/25, it was noted at the nursing station medication refrigerator that multiple medications, including insulin, vaccines, eye drops, and a refrigerated emergency kit containing various medications, were stored at a temperature of 34°F, as indicated by the thermometer. A review conducted on 01/08/25, of the medication refrigerator…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-09 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to follow their infection prevention control policy and protocol when nursing staff did not transport one out of five residents' (Resident 21) personal clothes in a clean linen cart used for transportation. The failure had the potential to cause cross contamination and spread of infection among the residents. Findings: During an observation on 1/8/2025 at 12:18 p.m. in the hallway near the laundary room, adjacent to room [ROOM NUMBER], Housekeeper/Laundary Staff (HKLS) held residents clothing, without gloves, about 5 to 6 of them, on clothes hangers, close to his body and walked down the hallway from the laundry room to Resident 21's room. There were other staff, two residents seated in their wheelchairs in the hallway, a housekeeper cleaning cart and a lunch tray cart in the hallway. During an observation on 1/6/2025 at 10:32 a.m., Resident 25, Resident 70, Resident 55, Resident 15, Resident 1, and Resident 4 were on Enhanced Barrier…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2022-10-14 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food was stored and prepared under sanitary conditions when: 1. A kitchen wall and equipment were not clean; 2. Multiple food items were unlabeled, and undated; 3. Staff food was stored in refrigerator #3. This failure had the potential to put residents at risk for cross contamination and food born illnesses. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 10/10/22, at 09:25 AM, with Dietary Director (DD), the wall behind Refrigerator #2 had dust, and black and gray particles. DD stated, the wall was dirty and needed to be cleaned. The can opener had black and brown particles and residue on the blade and on multiple surfaces. The toaster had black and brown particles on the crumb tray, and inner surfaces. In the dry storage, there was 1 dented can of Tuna 4.16 pounds. In the dry storage, there was a container of individually packaged syrups that were not labeled had an open or expiration dates. In the dry storage, there was an opened 10-pound Box of graham crumbs that was not labeled with…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-10-14 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were stored and labeled appropriately when: 1. Resident 4's expired inhaler and Resident 56's undated opened inhaler were found in medication cart 2. 2. One opened and undated PPD 1 ml. (milliliter, unit of measure) vial was found in medication room in Station 1. 3. The temperature of a room used for medication storage was not being monitored. 4. Loose pills were found in medication cart 3. 5. Two bottles of blood glucose test strips in medication cart 3 were not dated when opened. 6. Four opened unlabeled and undated vials of Insulin (medication to lower blood sugar level) were found in medication cart 3. 7. Resident 21's opened Insulin Kwik Pen (a type of insulin) in medication cart 3 was not dated when opened. These failures had the potential for medication misuse, drug diversion and medication ineffectiveness. Findings: 1. During an observation and concurrent interview with Registered Nurse (RN 2) on [DATE], at 9:23…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 37 rows in the source record cover these 16 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $1.3M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 10% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CA