No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Anberry Post Acute

1000 West Yosemite Avenue, Merced, CA 95341 · For profit - Partnership · 120 certified beds · (209) 783-9200 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (209) 783-9200 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)
Insights

This home’s record is mixed — some reassuring signs, some worth asking about.

In its favor
  • a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (38) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
  • about 19% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

3/5
CMS overall
3 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 3 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
737 W Childs Ave · (209) 383-1848 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
847 W Childs Ave
Grocery
682 Barbara Ct · (209) 355-7902 · Call to confirm hours
Park
(209) 385-6855 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
1108 W 2nd St · (800) 581-4141

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 4 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 2 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating3★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased5.9%10.2%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight2.8%4.0%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder1.4%0.8%0.9%worse
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.6%1.2%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms0.0%7.3%6.5%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.4%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury0.6%1.6%3.3%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened4.3%9.8%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication0.0%13.7%18.9%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%98.2%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers2.1%4.3%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control8.4%10.2%21.2%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table0.0%12.0%17.1%check this — see note marked star below the table
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.1%1.5%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%93.2%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission27.3%23.0%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit25.7%11.2%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.722.251.67typical
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days2.611.571.80worse

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

64.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 902 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

64.5%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.6%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
67.6%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.35U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.20hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.11hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.04hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 67.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 423 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.35 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 59% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 9% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF64.5%CMS range 60.2–67.651.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024better than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.6%CMS range 8.8–12.410.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge67.6%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge53.7%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge49.2%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge87.8%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened2.9%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.2%CMS range 4.9–9.17.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.841.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.28
RN hours/ resident / day
0.90
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.74
Aide hours/ resident / day
2.92
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.15
RN hoursweekends
41.3%
Total nursing turnover
50.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 93.2 residents a day — about 78% occupied, or roughly 27 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.92 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.28 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.74 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.48 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.10 on weekdays — 20% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.33 to 0.15 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 41% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

14
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-06-19)
17
at the previous standard inspection (2024-12-13)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

38 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 28 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-06-19 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Number of residents sampled: 6Number of residents cited: 2Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide needed care and services in accordance with professional standards of practice for two of six sampled residents (Resident 25 and Resident 74) when Resident 25 and Resident 74's fingernails and toenails were thick, long and had jagged edges.These failures placed Resident 25 and Resident 74 to experience discomfort and pain when wearing footwear and risk of skin breakdown which could lead to skin infection. During a concurrent observation and interview of 6/16/26 at 11:24 a.m. during initial tour in Resident 74's room, Resident 74 was observed sitting up in his wheelchair at bedside. Resident 74 observed fingernails and toenails thick, long with jagged edges. Resident 74 stated he did not remember the last time his nails were cut. Resident 74 stated he wanted his toenails cut because he could not wear his shoes or socks because his nails got caught in the socks. Resident 74 stated he wanted his fingernails cut because they were too long and could…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-06-19 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure pharmaceutical services were being met according to facility's policy and procedures when:1. Emergency medication kit was opened on 4/13/26 and had not been replaced by the pharmacy for over two months. This failure resulted in medication not being available in the e-kit (emergency medication container) and had the potential not to meet the needs of the residents during emergencies.2. Resident 75's medication brought by the family was not verified by the facility's licensed pharmacist. Resident 75's medication bottle of Lamotrigine (an antiepileptic medication uses to treat epilepsy [a seizure -a burst of uncontrolled electrical activity between brain cells that causes temporary abnormalities in muscle tone or movements, behaviors, sensations, or states of awareness]) 200 mg (milligrams -metric unit of measurement, used for medication dosage and/or amount) was stored in the medication cart and was available for use.This failure had…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-06-19 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications used were labeled and stored in accordance with professional standards when:1. A [Brand name] topical gel ointment (a topical gel ointment for external use only to relieve joint pain, stiffness and swelling 1.7 oz [ounce - unit of measurement]) with no medication label and no opened date was stored with other liquid and oral medication in front medication cart 300.This failure had the potential for cross contamination (a transfer of harmful bacteria from one object to another) and improper storage of medication.2. Resident 122's [Brand name] Ophthalmic Solution (an eye drops to lubricate, soothe dry burning or irritated eyes) had no open date and no used by date.This failure had the potential for Resident 122 to be administered expired medications had the potential to experience a negative outcome including decreased effectiveness of medication.3. Resident 19's [Brand name] (a nasal spray to treat both seasonal and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-06-19 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an effective infection prevention and control program to provide a safe and sanitary environment for three of seven sampled residents (Residents 21, 97, and 8) when:1. Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 5 did not wear appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE- specialized clothing, equipment, and supplies worn by healthcare workers to protect residents and themselves from potential infectious hazards) when LVN 5 accessed Resident 21's gastrostomy tube (GT, a tube that is placed directly into the stomach through an abdominal wall incision for administration of food, fluids, and medications) on 6/16/26. Resident 21 was on enhanced barrier precaution (EBP- measures used in healthcare settings to prevent the spread of infections) due to presence of GT. 2. Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 5 did not wear appropriate PPE when CNA 5 provided direct care to Resident 97 who was on EBP on 6/18/26. 3. CNA 5 and CNA6 left two used PPE…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-06-19 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to develop a baseline care plan for one of seven residents (Resident 97) when Resident 97 did not have a baseline care plan initiated within 48 hours of admission on [DATE] for end stage renal disease (ESRD -a condition where the kidneys can no longer function and hemodialysis treatment (a medical treatment that uses a machine to clean a person's blood by removing waste products and excess water). This failure had the potential to result in Resident 97's hemodialysis needs to go unmet, which placed Resident 97 at risk for complications associated with ESRD which could compromise Resident 97's overall health. Findings:During a concurrent observation and interview on 6/17/2026 9:51 a.m. with Resident 97, in Resident 97's room, Resident 97 was lying on bed, awake, alert and oriented to person, places, and situation. Resident 97 stated she is receiving dialysis treatment.During a concurrent interview and record review on 6/17/26 at 11:35 a.m. with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-19 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan (CP) for one of seven sampled residents (Resident 3) when Resident 3 did not have a comprehensive CP implemented for Resident 3's depression medication. This failure had the potential for Resident 3's medication side effects and adverse reactions to go unnoticed and undetected by nursing staff.During a review of Resident 3's admission Record (AR - a summary of information regarding a patient which includes patient identification, past medical history, insurance status, care providers, family contact information and other pertinent information), dated 6/18/26, the AR indicated Resident 3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis of displaced intertrochanteric fracture of right femur-subsequent encounter for closed fracture with routine healing (a broken right thigh bone), unspecified fracture of the lower end of left radius (a broken left wrist) subsequent encounter for closed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-19 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Number of residents sampled: 5Number of residents cited: 2Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide services that met professional standards of quality for two of five sampled residents (Resident 9 and Resident 25) when Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 1 and LVN 3 did not follow physician order to administer Apixaban (medication used to prevent and treat blood clots) medication with food to Resident 9 and Resident 25 during medication pass on 6/18/26.These failures to follow proper medication administration had the potential to result in reduced effectiveness of treatment or harm to Resident 9 and Resident 25.During a concurrent observation and interview on 6/18/26 at 7:53 a.m. with LVN 1 outside of Resident 25's room, LVN 1 observed preparing Resident 25's medications including Apixaban. LVN 1 entered Resident 25's room and administered medications without food. Resident 12 was lying in bed watching TV and breakfast tray was on top of the over the bed table untouched.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-06-19 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that the administration of enteral nutrition (delivers specialized liquid formulas directly to the stomach) was consistent with physician's orders for one of seven sampled residents (Resident 21) when Resident 21's enteral nutrition was administered by Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 5 for almost three hours past the prescribed time of administration on 6/16/26. Resident 21 was NPO (nothing by mouth).This failure resulted in Resident 21 receiving her enteral feeding (also referred to as tube feeding is the delivery of nutrients through a feeding tube directly into the stomach) late and had the potential risk of receiving inadequate nutrition and experience unrecognized decline in health conditions which could compromise Resident 21's overall health.Findings:During a concurrent observation and interview on 6/16/26 at 10:09 a.m. with Resident 21, in Resident 21's room, Resident 21 was self-propelling her wheelchair from bathroom to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-19 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure necessary respiratory care consistent with professional standards of practice was provided for one of seven sampled residents (Resident 92) when there was no physician's order for Resident 92's use of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP -a non-invasive ventilation machine that involves the administration of air usually through the nose by an external device at a predetermined level of pressure), a comprehensive person-centered care plan was not developed and implemented and the CPAP was not being routinely cleaned by the facility staff. Resident 92 had a diagnosis of Sleep Apnea (a condition that makes you stop breathing while you're sleeping).These failures resulted in Resident 92 not being assessed and monitored by qualified staff for the effectiveness of the CPAP, possible complications or side effects (unwanted undesirable effects) related to CPAP use and had the potential for Resident 92 to experience unrecognized…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-06-19 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident's entire medication regimen was monitored to promote or maintain the resident's highest practicable mental, physical, and psychosocial well-being for three of ten sampled residents (Resident 8, Resident 2 and Resident 24) when:1.Resident 8 was not being monitored for anticoagulant (medication that prevents blood clots from forming) side effects as indicated on Resident 8's care plan. Resident 8 was receiving Rivaroxaban (a blood thinner that treats or prevents blood clots) for Deep Vein Thrombosis (DVT) prophylaxis preventive measures used to stop the formation of dangerous blood clots in deep veins, primarily in the legs) and Atrial Fibrillation (an irregular, often rapid heart rate that commonly causes poor blood flow). This failure resulted in Resident 8 not being monitored for possible complications or side effects (unwanted undesirable effects that are possibly related to a drug) of anticoagulant by qualified staff…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 28 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-19 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure food was stored, prepared, distributed, and served in accordance with professional standards for food service safety when:1. A box of zucchini was not labelled and dated in the walk-in refrigerator.2. Station 200's nourishment unit refrigerator was observed with a box of pizza brought into the facility that was not properly labeled with the resident's name, room number, date the food was brought in, opened or the use-by date.These failures had the potential for staff to have access to expired foods for residents.1. During concurrent observation and interview on 6/16/26 at 9:31 a.m. with the Kitchen [NAME] (KC) inside the walk-in refrigerator, an unlabeled and undated plastic bin containing zucchini was observed on a metal rack. KC stated all food items inside should be labeled. KC stated, once food or produce is put into another container for use, it should be labeled with received date and use by date. KC stated the kitchen staff missed the labelling of food and produce.During an interview on 6/17/26…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-19 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain medical records of residents that are complete and accurately documented in accordance with accepted professional standards and practice for two of 10 sampled residents (Resident 11 and Resident 9) when:1.Resident 11's electronic health record (EHR) contained no documentation of completed ileostomy (a specific type of surgery where the lower part of the small intestine is brought through an opening in the belly to form a stoma [an artificial opening made by a surgeon on the abdomen-belly]) bag changes since 7/3/25.This failure had the potential to disrupt continuity of care, create gaps in the services provided, and lead to miscommunication among staff regarding Resident 11's status.2. Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 1 did not document Resident 9's medications administered in his electronic Medication Administration Record (eMAR-digital medication chart or a smart medicine checklist used by nurse and caregivers) after she…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-06-19 · tag F0887 — isolated
    Educate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to educate and offer Covid-19 vaccinations for three of three sampled employees (Certified Nurse Assistant [CNA] 5, CNA 7, and Licensed Vocational Nurse [LVN] 5) when CNA 5, 7, and LVN 5's employee files were reviewed and did not contain documentation that staff were provided education regarding the benefits and potential risks associated with COVID-19 vaccinations or if they were offered the COVID-19 vaccination.This failure had the potential to increase the risk to vulnerable nursing home residents by potentially exposing them to outbreaks and raising the likelihood of severe illness or death.During an interview on 6/19/26 at 9:50 a.m. with the Infection Preventionist (IP), the IP stated the facility did not offer Covid 19 vaccinations for staff because it was no longer mandated for staff to be vaccinated.During a concurrent interview and record review on 6/19/26 at 11:11 a.m. with the Director of Staff Development (DSD), three employee files (CNA 5, CNA 7, and LVN 5) were reviewed. The employee files reviewed did not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-06-19 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolated
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a safe, functional, and sanitary condition was maintained when four containers (five gallon each) containing chemicals in the dirty area of the laundry room were found covered with thick white foamy substance and the floor directly below the containers also contained the thick white foamy substance. This failure had the potential to affect the health condition of the 105 residents, staff and visitors of the facility, like severe skin burns, eye damage and toxic (poisonous or harmful) respiratory irritation. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on [DATE] at 8:22 a.m. with the Laundry Person (LP) in the dirty room area of the laundry room, nine containers were stacked in the corner of the room and four of the containers were covered with a white foamy substance. The LP stated she did not notice the thick white foamy substance covering the containers and was not sure what the white foamy substance was. The LP stated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-19 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to meet professional standards of quality for one of three residents (Resident 1) when Resident 1 was admitted with a pressure ulcer (a localized area of skin damage and underlying tissue that develops when prolonged pressure is applied to the body) of the sacral region (the area of the lower back and pelvis) and Resident 1 required to be turned and repositioned every two hours. Resident 1's care plans did not indicate Resident 1 be turned and repositioned every two hours and Resident 1's medical records did not indicate Resident 1 was turned and repositioned every two hours. This failure resulted in incomplete and inaccurate documentation of when Resident 1 was turned and repositioned and had the potential to result in the worsening of Resident 1's pressure ulcer and the potential of developing new pressure ulcers resulting in the death of Resident 1 on [DATE] with a diagnosis of septic shock (a life-threatening condition that occurs when an infection…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · F2024-12-13 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — widespread
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to inform and provide written information on how to formulate an advance directive (a legal document that outlines a person's wishes regarding their medical care in the event they become unable to make decisions for themselves due to illness or injury) for 87 of 87 residents when staff did not document information on how to obtain an advance directive in resident charts. This failure violated the rights of 87 residents to be informed on how to formulate and obtain an advance directive. Findings: During an interview on 12/11/24 at 10:28 a.m. with the Medical Records Director (MRD), the MRD stated the facility did not help residents obtain an advance directive, they refer the resident to someone else such as their primary physician to get an advance directive completed. The MRD stated the facility will only keep a resident's advance directive on file in their chart if a resident came in with one. The MRD stated if a resident did not have an existing advance directive when they came into the facility no education or information…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-12-13 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — widespread
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to revise and implement a person-centered comprehensive care plan (CP- road map for the care of a resident and a necessary tool in following the nursing process) for one of eight sampled residents (Resident 45) when the care plan was not updated to reflect discharge from hospice (end of life) service. This failure had the potential for Resident 45's needs to not be meet. Findings: During an interview on 12/10/24 at 9:38 p.m. in Resident 45's room with Family Member (FM) 1, FM 1 stated her mother was no longer on hospice services. During a concurrent interview and record review on 12/11/24 at 11:23 a.m. with License Vocation Nurse (LVN) 5, LVN 5 stated Resident 45 had been on hospice but was discharged from hospice on 11/16/24. LVN 5 stated the care plan for hospice should have been updated on the same day Resident 45 was discharged from hospice. LVN 5 stated the business office and primary physician were notified when Resident 45 was discharged from…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-12-13 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — widespread
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to meet professional standards of practice for four of 16 sampled residents (Resident 46, Resident 231, Resident 233, and Resident 235) when: 1. Resident 46, Resident 231 and Resident 235's oxygen tubing were not labled with the date the tubing was changed. This failure put Residents 46, 231 and 235 at risk of infection. 2. The Attending Physician (AP) was not notified when Resident 233's medication for hypertension (high blood pressure) was not given due to low blood pressure levels. This failure put resident 233 at risk of harm due to low blood pressure levels. 3. Resident 235's physician order (a set of instructions written by a doctor for clinicians to follow when caring for a resident) for oxygen flow rate was for 2 L/min (liters per minute - a unit of measurement) and it was set at 4.5 L/min. This failure resulted in Resident 235 receiving too much oxygen and had the potential to result shortness of breath and respiratory distress…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-12-13 · tag F0732 — widespread
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure nursing staff information data posting contained or demonstrated the total numbers and actual hours worked by Registered nurses (RN), license vocational nurses (LVN) and Certified nurse aides, were posted daily. This failure resulted in 87 out of 87 residents and their family members not being able to identify who was responsible for their care, how many licensed and unlicensed staff were on shift, and the total number of hours staff were working. Findings: During an observation on 12/13/24 at 2:35 p.m. in the hallway, the Census and Direct Care Services Hours Per Patient Day (DHPPD) did not contain the total number of actual hours worked for RNs, LVNs and CNAs. During an interview on 12/13/24 at 3:04 p.m. with the Administrator (ADM) the ADM stated, We have only CNA hours posted and no nursing hours posted. The ADM stated, the posting sign had CNA actual hours and no licensed nurse actual hours posted. The ADM stated he was not aware the hours needed to be posted. The ADM stated there were no posted…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-12-13 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — widespread
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide palatable and flavorful food when: 1. Broccoli was bland and without flavor for the regular diet. 79 Residents received broccoli at the facility. 2. Puree salad did not taste good. Five residents (Residents 2, 9, 63, 481, 482) were on the puree diet. These failures resulted in lack of flavor and palatability in vegetables and puree salad which can lead to residents having a decreased food intake and could result in weight loss and further compromise nutritional and medical status. There were 84 residents eating at the facility. Findings: During an interview on 12/9/24 at 1:10 p.m. with Resident 60 (R 60), R 60 stated the food was bland. During an interview on 12/10/24 at 12:32 p.m. with Resident 20 (R 20), R 20 stated the food did not taste good and he will not eat the food item if he does not like it. During a review of the facility menu titled, Winter Menus, the lunch menu on 12/10/24 indicated residents on regular, mechanical soft, dysphagia mechanical, no added salt and controlled carbohydrate…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-12-13 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food and ice were stored, distributed, and served safely when: 1. The ice machine was observed with black spots above the water trough (a compartment within the ice machine where water is stored before it is frozen into ice cubes) and pink residue on the ice grate (a compartment within the ice machine that determines the size of the ice cubes that are produced) and sensor (monitors ice levels) 2. Apple juice pitcher located in the nourishment room refrigerator was dated past the use by date; and 3. The nourishment room refrigerator had dry, sticky substance on bottom drawers and a door shelf. These failures resulted in a unit refrigerator and facility ice machine not being in clean safe operating condition, and juice kept past the use by date, which can lead to the growth of microorganisms and can result in foodborne illness for the 84 residents consuming food, juice, and ice at the facility. Findings: 1. During a concurrent observation and interview on 12/11/24 at 9:19 a.m. with Maintenance (MN) in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-12-13 · tag F0623 — pattern
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to notify residents and residents' representatives (RP-person designated to make decisions for a resident) in writing of a resident's transfer to the hospital for four of eight residents (Resident 2, 16, 33, and 41) when the facility did not provide written notice to the resident or their RP when they were transferred to the hospital. This failure violated the rights of Residents 2, 16, 33, and 41 to be informed in writing of the reason for transfer to the hospital. Findings: During an interview on 12/24/24 at 2:39 p.m. with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 1, LVN 1 stated she had never sent a notification in writing to the resident or their RP whenever a transfer to the hospital occurred. LVN 1 stated if residents had an RP, nurses would call them, but no written notice was ever given to the RP regarding reason for transfer to the hospital. LVN 1 stated if residents or their RP's were not given a written notice for the reason for the hospitalization they may be unaware as to why the resident was sent to the hospital During an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-12-13 · tag F0625 — pattern
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide residents and residents' representatives (RP- a person designated to make decisions for a resident) written information regarding the bed hold policy for four of eight sampled residents (Resident 2, 16, and 41) when no written notices about the facility's bed hold policy was given to residents or their RPs upon the residents' transfer to the hospital. This failure violated the right for residents and RPs to be notified in writing of the facility's bed hold policy. Findings: During an interview on 12/12/24 at 9:01 a.m. with the Business Office Manager (BOM), the BOM stated whenever residents were transferred to the hospital the business office would call the RP to let them know of the bed hold policy, but she would not send them a notification in writing. The BOM stated a written bed hold notification was only given to residents and their RPs on admission and no written notice was given upon transfer to the hospital. The BOM stated she was not aware RPs needed written information regarding bed holds to be given to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-13 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement comprehensive person-centered care plans (CP - a detailed approach to care customized to an individual resident's needs) for two of 16 residents (Residents 231, and 235) when Resident 231 and Resident 235 did not have care plans for oxygen administration. This failure put Residents 231 and 235 at risk for harm due to improper monitoring, documentation and administration of oxygen use. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 12/09/24 at 11:56 a.m. in Resident 231's room, Resident 231 was observed in a gown, sitting in a wheelchair with oxygen infusing via a nasal cannula (a tube that delivers oxygen through the nose to people who have low oxygen levels). Resident 231 stated she had been in the facility for two days. Resident 231 stated she was in the facility due to having a mini stroke (stroke -(damage to tissues in the brain due to a loss of oxygen to the area). During a review of Resident 231's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-13 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure drugs and biologicals (a substance such as vaccines or drugs derived from a living organism used for treatment) were stored and labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional standards of practice when: 1. The refrigerator in section 300-Medroom contained an antibiotic with an unreadable expiration date. Carts 200-Backside and 300-B contained : one of five inhalers (medications used to treat respiratory disease with a mist or spray that the patient breathes in through the nose or mouth) had an expiration date of 11/2/24, lactulose (a medication used to decrease the amount of ammonia in the blood) had an expiration date of 12/2/24, 11 of 143 pill packets had expired dates in November, 26 of 60 ferrous gluconate (a medication to treat low iron in the blood) expired 5/24, combined with new packets of pills individually packaged with date of 1/27 one of one bottle of folic acid (a mineral) did not have a readable expiration date on the bottle, one of four bottles of insulin (a medication used…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-12-13 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure menus were followed for 16 Residents (Resident 5, 7, 13, 18, 23, 28, 32, 33, 35, 36, 41, 44, 45, 52, 60, 281) when a dessert was served that was not on the planned and approved menu. This failure had the potential to result in 16 residents having a decreased intake of nutrients and lower satisfaction and interest of the meal as the resident could have been looking forward to receiving the planned and approved dessert menu item. Findings: During a review of Winter Menus for Monday 12/9/24, (undated), the Winter Menus indicated the lunch served on Monday included, .Southern Style Beef Pattie, Cream Gravy, Mashed Potatoes, Garlic Parmesan Spinach, Parsley Sprig Garnish, Wheat Roll, Margarine [butter] Ambrosia Pudding with 2 sl [slices] mandarin oranges/ 1 tsp [teaspoon] coconut . During an observation on 12/9/24 at 12:36 p.m., in the kitchen at tray line, resident trays at the end of tray line had different desserts placed on the resident trays. Sixteen Residents (Resident 5, 7, 13, 18, 23, 28, 32, 33,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-13 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, two of two Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVN 4 and LVN 7) failed to implement and maintain infection control practices to provide a safe and sanitary environment to help prevent the development and transmission of infections when: 1. Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 4 failed to don appropriate Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) prior to entering an isolation room. 2. LVN 7 failed to perform hand hygiene (the cleansing of hands with soap and water, antiseptic hand washes, and antiseptic hand rubs such as alcohol-based hand sanitizers) before and after administering medications. 3. LVN 7 failed to sanitize a glucometer (a device used to measure the amount of sugar in the blood, typically using a small drop of blood placed on a test strip) according to manufacturer's instructions before placing it back in the medication cart. These failures put residents at risk of acquiring healthcare associated infections (infections that patients get while or soon after receiving…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-13 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide personal hygiene for one of eight sampled residents (Resident 46) when Resident 46's fingernails were long and not cut. This failure had the potential to result in Resident 46 to develop skin infections or sustain skin injuries. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 12/10/24 at 12:01p.m. in Resident 46's room, Resident 46 had long yellow fingernails. Resident 46 stated he did not like his fingernails long and wanted them cut or filed. Resident 46 stated he was a diabetic and long fingernails could have caused infections when he scratched his skin. Resident 46 stated he did not remember the last time staff cut or trimmed his fingernails. During a concurrent observation and interview on 12/13/24 at 8:17 a.m. with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 6, CNA 6 stated Resident 46's fingernails were long and should have been trimmed or cut. CNA 6 stated Resident 46's long fingernails were dirty and could have contained…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-13 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure two of seventeen sampled residents (Resident 32 and 236) were free from unnecessary medications when: 1. Monitoring for behaviors and non-pharmaceutical interventions were not implemented for Resident 236 while administering anti-psychotic medications (a medication used to treat a collection of symptoms that affect your ability to tell what's real and what is not). 2. Resident 32 did not have monitoring orders for her anxiety and bipolar disorder in place upon her admission to the facility on [DATE]. These failures placed Resident 32 and Resident 236 at risk for receiving unnecessary antipsychotic medications and had the potential of preventing them from maintaining their highest practicable mental, physical, and psychosocial well-being. Findings: 1. During an observation on 12/9/24 at 12:25 p.m.in Resident 236's room, Resident 236 was observed eating his meal. Resident 236 began speaking very loud in his native language ([NAME])…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-13 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of eight sampled residents (Resident 21) food preferences were accommodated when halal (Halal food is prepared and processed in accordance with Islamic law and dietary standards outlined in the Quran) meat was not served. This failure had the potential to place Resident 21 at risk for not meeting his nutritional status and feeling worried and anxious about his health status. Finding: During an interview on 12/10/24 at 10:21 a.m. in Resident 21's room, Resident 21 stated he was not able to consume protein in the form of meat products. Resident 21 stated, he would like to have Halal meat and the facility was not able to accommodate to his food preferences. Resident 21 stated he was worried about his protein intake. Resident 21 stated he was ordering bone broth from online store so he can get some protein. Resident 21 stated, I want to consume meat and I want the facility to help me obtain my protein from halal meat. Resident 21…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-13 · tag F0807 — failed to offer suitable drinks — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides drinks consistent with resident needs and preferences and sufficient to maintain resident hydration.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide one of eight sampled residents (Resident 60) fluid consistent with resident needs and preferences when Resident 60's standing order (a written instruction from a healthcare provider that authorizes nurses, pharmacists, or other healthcare professionals to perform specific tasks or administer treatments without the need for an individual order each time) included apple juice and Resident 60's dislikes included apple juice. This failure placed Resident 60 at risk of not having sufficient fluid intake to maintain proper hydration. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 12/9/24 at 1:09 p.m. in Resident 60's room, a cup of apple juice was on the lunch tray. Resident 60 stated, They don't always honor my food preferences. Resident 60 stated, I don't know why I have a standing order for apple juice. Resident 60 stated, I won't drink everyday but once in a while. During a concurrent interview and record review on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-13 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure accurate and complete medical records in accordance with professional standards of practices for one of nine sampled residents (Resident 59) when the Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (POLST- a form that contains written medical orders for healthcare professionals regarding specific medical treatments that can or cannot be done at the end-of life) was not accurate and complete with section B (Medical Interventions) unmarked. This failure had the potential for Resident 59's decisions regarding treatment options and end of life wishes to not be honored. Findings: During a review of Resident 59's admission Record (AR - a summary of information regarding a patient which includes patient identification, past medical history, insurance status, care providers, family contact information and other pertinent information), dated 12/13/24, the AR indicated Resident 59 was admitted to the facility from the acute care hospital on [DATE] with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-11-02 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — widespread
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure drugs and biologicals were stored in locked compartments and not left unlocked while they were unattended by authorized staff. This deficient practice was observed for 2 of 2 treatment carts in the facility and had the potential to affect all residents who resided on the 200 and 300 halls. Findings included: Review of a facility policy titled, Medications Storage, with a review date of 01/31/2022, revealed, It is the policy of this facility that all medications, drugs and biologicals are to be stored in a safe, secure and orderly manner, at a temperature as directed by the manufacturer, and accessible to only licensed nurses and the pharmacist in accordance with federal and state regulations. During an observation on 10/31/2023 at 7:21 AM, the treatment cart on the 300 Hall was observed unlocked and unattended. The contents of the treatment cart included tubes of lidocaine ointment (an aesthetic used to prevent and treat pain from some procedures, minor burns, scrapes, and insect bites), clotrimazole…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-02 · tag F0554 — isolated
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was assessed to determine if self-administration of medication was clinically appropriate for 1 (Resident #48) of 6 sampled residents reviewed for medication administration. Specifically, Resident #48 was found with two white pills in a small cup at bedside with no staff present without an assessment of the resident's ability to safely self-administer the medication. Findings included: A review of a facility policy titled, Medications, Self-Administration, reviewed on 01/31/2022, revealed, It is the policy of this facility that an individual resident may self-administer specific medications if the IDT [interdisciplinary team] has determined that this practice is safe, and physician orders are obtained for self-administration of the specific medication(s). The policy specified, 2. If a resident voices desire to self-administer medications, the IDT is to assess the resident's cognitive, physical and visual ability to carry out this responsibility. 3. A licensed nurse…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-02 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews, record review, facility document review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a Level II evaluation was completed after a positive Level I Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) for 1 (Resident #65) of 1 sampled resident reviewed for PASARRs. Findings included: Review of guidance from the California Department of Health Care Services (DHCS), dated 08/09/2023, indicated, Purpose: The PASRR [Preadmission Screening and Resident Review] Information Notice (IN) clarifies the Hospitals' and SNFs' [skilled nursing facilities'] responsibilities to provide MCPs [Medi-Cal Managed Care Plans, health care for people with low or no income] confirmation that a PASRR Level I Screening was completed and to provide completed PASRR documentation for cases that advance to a Level II Evaluation with SNF referrals for prior authorization. Further review of the guidance indicated, PASRR documentation is no longer required to be sent to the MCP when a Level I Screening is negative for SMI [serious mental illness] and/or ID/DD/RC [intellectual…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-02 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure staff monitored the skin as ordered by the physician for 1 (Resident #36) of 2 sampled residents reviewed for skin issues. Findings included: Review of a facility policy titled, Skin Assessments, dated 07/18/2023, revealed Purpose: To ensure that every resident admitted to and residing at the facility has their skin checked on a routine basis for any conditions that require medical intervention. If skin breakdown occurs, a resident is to receive the appropriate treatment per physician's order. Review of Resident #36's admission Record revealed the facility readmitted the resident on 10/06/2023 with diagnoses that included fracture of neck of the left femur (hip area) and age-related osteoporosis with a current pathological fracture. Review of Resident #36's admission Minimum Date Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) dated 10/12/2023, revealed the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 11, which indicated the resident had moderate cognitive impairment. The MDS…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-02 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, record review, and policy reviews, the facility failed to ensure a bi-level positive airway pressure (BiPAP) mask and an updraft nebulizer mask were stored in a bag when they were not in use for 1 (Resident #58) of 2 sampled residents reviewed for respiratory care. Findings included: Review of a facility policy titled, CPAP [continuous positive airway pressure] and BiPAP Use, revised on 01/31/2022, revealed, 11. Nursing staff is to ensure that the CPAP/BiPAP is kept clean at all times, and that the mask is cleaned according to the manufacturer's recommendations prior to each use. Review of a facility policy titled, Nebulizer Treatments, revised on 01/31/2022, revealed, 4. Remove nebulizer from plastic bag. Connect tubing to oxygen source and fill the nebulizer with prescribed medication. a. Nebulizer tubing and storage bags are to be changed weekly, on Sundays, and dated when changed. A review of Resident #58's admission Record indicated the facility readmitted the resident on 09/27/2023 with diagnoses that included acute and chronic respiratory…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-02 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's medication regimen was free from unnecessary medications for 1 (Resident #17) of 5 sampled residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Specifically, Resident #17 had an order for lorazepam 0.5 milligrams (mg), one tablet by mouth every six hours as needed (PRN) for anxiety and agitation started on 06/15/2023 with no specified duration (stop date). Findings included: A review of a facility policy titled, Medications, Psychotherapeutic Drugs, reviewed on 01/31/2022, revealed, Purpose: To provide a therapeutic environment using only those medications with a therapeutic value to individual residents. The use of unnecessary drugs is to be avoided whenever possible. Policy: It is the policy of this facility that psychotherapeutic drugs will not be administered for purposes of discipline or convenience, and if required is to be used to treat the resident's medical symptoms. Each resident's drug regimen is to be free from unnecessary drugs. The section of the policy titled,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
GORMLY, DONALDIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL50%since 11/20/2015
DG 2016 HOLDINGS TRUST DATED SEPTEMBER 14, 2016Organization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST25%since 12/31/2018
DH 2016 HOLDINGS TRUST DATED NOVEMBER 28, 2016Organization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST25%since 12/31/2018
DON AND NANCY GORMLY FAMILY TRUST DATED FEBRUARY 25, 2002Organization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 12/31/2018
JERRY AND DEBBIE HOLLOWAY REVOCABLE TRUST DATED FEBRUARY 25, 2002Organization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 12/31/2018
JH 2016 HOLDINGS TRUST DATED NOVEMBER 28, 2016Organization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST25%since 12/31/2018
NG 2016 HOLDINGS TRUST DATED SEPTEMBER 14, 2016Organization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST25%since 12/31/2018
GORMLY, NANCYIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE DIRECTORNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 12/31/2018
HOLLOWAY, DEBRAIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE DIRECTORNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 12/31/2018
HOLLOWAY, JERRYIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 12/31/2018
KUHLS, DAVIDIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 12/16/2016

CMS files one row per role, so the 19 rows in the source record cover these 11 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

6 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$17.3M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+14.8%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$2.8M
Related-party expense19% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 43%Medicare 46%Other / private 11%

This home reported $2.8M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 19% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$484per resident / day
operating cost
$14,719per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$568per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in California
$12,167/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$15,178/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,000/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 555901. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-06-19, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next