No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

The Redwoods, A Community Of Seniors

40 Camino Alto, Mill Valley, CA 94941 · Non profit - Corporation · 58 certified beds · (415) 383-2741 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (415) 383-2741 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citations — no harm found (F0605, F0609) — most recent May 2026Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)4 actual-harm citations$103,054 in federal fines1 Medicare payment denial
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

In its favor
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
Worth asking about
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605, F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has 4 actual-harm citations
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (42) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $103,054 in federal fines (most recent 2024-07-12)
  • its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 4 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★★ 5/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
61 Camino Alto · (415) 383-0918 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
45 Camino Alto · (415) 389-9671 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
Safeway<0.1 mi
1 Camino Alto · (415) 388-6216 · Call to confirm hours
Park
280 Sycamore Ave · (415) 383-1370 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 2 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 3 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased21.8%10.2%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight6.0%4.0%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.7%0.8%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection1.5%1.2%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms1.5%7.3%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.4%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury7.5%1.6%3.3%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened18.2%9.8%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication14.4%13.7%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine97.4%98.2%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers1.5%4.3%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control22.2%10.2%21.2%typical
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table18.5%12.0%17.1%typical
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.0%1.5%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine84.8%93.2%79.4%typical
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission34.6%23.0%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit4.4%11.2%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.862.251.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.891.571.80typical

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

66.3% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 74 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

66.3%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
9.7%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
61.1%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.33U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.15hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.17hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.01hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 61.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 54 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.33 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 56% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 19% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF66.3%CMS range 52.7–74.251.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024better than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF9.7%CMS range 6.0–14.410.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge61.1%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge44.4%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge63.0%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified36.7%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting33.3%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge43.2%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay1.3%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization8.6%CMS range 5.3–17.17.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.931.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.53
RN hours/ resident / day
0.95
LPN hours/ resident / day
3.17
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.65
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.44
RN hoursweekends
40.4%
Total nursing turnover
55.6%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 58 beds and averages 43.4 residents a day — about 75% occupied, or roughly 15 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.65 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.53 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.17 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.22 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.82 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.57 to 0.44 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 40% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

11
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-05-22)
12
at the previous standard inspection (2024-07-12)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

42 citations, most serious first. The 14 most serious are shown; the remaining 28 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-07-12 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure two of fourteen sampled residents (Resident 34 and Resident 190) at risk for falls, were provided with supervision (visual checks) by direct care staff and had effective revisions and implementation of their nursing care plans to prevent further falls to keep them safe. Facility policies on safety and management of falls were not followed. As a result, Resident 190 suffered two falls with major injuries, consisting of hip fractures, at the facility, and one fall with no injuries. This caused severe pain to Resident 190 and may have contributed to her death, just 7 days after her last fall with major injury. Resident 34 fell 7 times in 4 months due to lack of supervision, revision, and implementation of care plans to prevent falls. This had the potential to result in falls with major injuries for Resident 34. Findings: Resident 190 Record review of the facility Face Sheet (Facility Demographic) indicated Resident 190 was admitted to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2023-09-27 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to 1. provide supervision and assistance for a toileting needs for one out of two sampled residents (Resident 4). 2. ensure the pharmacist conduct a medication regimen review (MRR, a review of all medications the patient is currently using in order to identify any potential adverse effects and drug reactions) for fall to prevent avoidable accidents or falls. These failures led to Resident 4 ' s unwitnessed fall that resulted to hospitalization due to left leg severe pain. While at the hospital, Resident 4 was diagnosed with closed fracture (a break in the bone) of neck of left femur (thigh) and subsequently had to undergo left hip fracture hemiarthroplasty (a type of partial hip replacement procedure that involves replacing half of the hip joint). Findings: During a review of Resident 4 ' s face sheet (demographics), it indicated she had a diagnoses of Essential Hypertension (high blood pressure that is not due to another medical condition), Hyperlipidemia (an elevated level of lipids - like cholesterol, a waxy, fat-like…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · G2022-02-18 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to assess, prevent, and treat a wound for one of thirteen residents (Resident 14) when the facility admitted Resident 14 with right shoulder Anti-subluxation brace/sling (a medical device intended to protect the shoulder joint from partial dislocation cause by caused by paralysis or injury in the shoulder joint capsule), and no weekly skin assessment was done. This failure resulted in Resident 14 developing a wound inside her right armpit with infection, and there was no current wound assessment and wound care order from the Physician. Findings: During a review of Resident 14's medical record, the facility admitted Resident 14 on 12/30/21. The Skin Evaluation Form dated 12/30/22, indicated Resident 14's skin had no existing issues. The Baseline care plan dated 1/3/22, indicated Resident 14 was at risk for skin breakdown and skin would be checked weekly and new skin concerns would be reported to the doctor for treatment and follow up. The Nursing Notes dated 2/11/21, indicated there was an open wound with pus on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2022-02-18 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY A review of Resident 26's face-sheet indicated, Resident 26 was admitted with a diagnosis that included Parkinson's disease (a progressive brain disorder that leads to shaking, stiffness, and difficulty with walking, balance, and coordination), history of Falling, and unsteadiness on feet. During an interview on 2/16/2022 at 1:35 p.m., Resident 26's daughter stated she is worried about her father's increased number of falls. The daughter stated her father just returned two days (2/12/22) ago from (name) (acute care) hospital because of a fall. The staff told her, the CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) could not watch her father all the time and suggested that she might consider getting a 1:1 (one-on one) sitter (one person who will only monitor one resident), but we would have to pay out of pocket for that care. During an interview on 2/17/2022 at 4:17 p.m., Staff Q was asked what they do to monitor Resident 26 for falls. Staff Q stated when a resident fell, she completed an assessment of the Resident and made…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2026-05-22 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility's dietary staff failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food under sanitary conditions and in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for a census of 42 when:1. A manual can opener had missing metal on the tip, creating a potential physical contaminant hazard during food preparation; and,2. A resident was served a beverage in a glass tumbler with jagged, sharp edges during the lunch meal service.This failure decreased the facility's potential to prevent the spread of foodborne illnesses, physical injuries such as cuts, increased blood exposure risk, and unsanitary meal conditions for a vulnerable resident population.1. During the initial kitchen tour on 5/19/26 at 8:33 a.m., the can opener blade was observed with significant dark discoloration along the cutting edges, consistent with buildup or corrosion. The tip of the blade was noted to have missing metal.During an interview on 5/20/26 at 3:01 p.m., with the Registered Dietitian (RD), the RD confirmed the manual can opener had visible…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-05-22 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the nursing staff failed to ensure infection prevention and control practices were implemented for a census of 42 residents when:Hand hygiene was not performed during resident dining;Hand hygiene was not performed during medication administration;Shared resident equipment was not cleaned between uses; and,Appropriate Personal Protective Equipment (PPE-specialized clothing and gear which acts as a physical barrier to the wearer to minimize spread of infectious diseases) was not worn by nursing staff during a transfer of Resident 6 who had Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP-infection control measures used to prevent spread of multi-drug resistant organisms by using PPE during high contact resident care) in place .These failures decreased the facility's potential to prevent the spread of infection amongst the residents. Findings: 1. During an observation conducted on 5/19/26 at 12:10 p.m. in the facility dining area, Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs) were observed obtaining individual plated meals from a hot buffet service line and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2026-05-22 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — widespread
    Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to implement an effective pest control program for a census of 42 when a fly was observed in the kitchen's food prep area.This failure had the potential to contribute to the spread of foodborne illnesses among a vulnerable resident population.During the initial kitchen tour on 5/19/26 at 8:29 a.m., a large, clear plastic storage container labeled Jam, Opened: Apricot was observed sitting completely uncovered on the stainless-steel prep table. A live fly was perched directly on the top rim of this uncovered container, in immediate proximity to the exposed food product.During an interview on 5/19/26 at 8:41 a.m. with the Registered Dietitian (RD), the RD confirmed a fly was in the kitchen, noting it posed a food safety and sanitation risk for resident meals.During an interview on 5/22/26 at 10:13 a.m. with the Administrator (ADM), the ADM stated the facility was expected to remain free of hazards, including pests to prevent potential contamination of surfaces.A review of the facility's policy and procedure (P&P)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-22 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensed nurses failed to remove the following expired items from Medication Cart One of two medication carts:One expired bottle of NSAIDs,One expired bottle of aspirin,One expired bottle of vitamin B-12, andOne expired Covid-19 test. In addition, the medication disposal container contained only pills, with no drug blocker or moisture activated agent to breakdown the medications. These failures decreased the facility's ability to safely administer medications and increased the risk of drug diversion (the illegal redirection of prescription or controlled medication from their intended medical use to unauthorized or illicit use).Findings:In a concurrent observation and interview with Licensed Nurse 2 (LN 2) on 5/20/26 at 2:36 p.m. during a medication cart inspection, LN 2 confirmed:One bottle of naproxen sodium, expired February 2026, was in use;One bottle of aspirin, expired September 2025, was in use;One bottle of Vitamin B-12, expired May, 2026, was in use; and,One Covid-19 test, expired on 4/3/24, was in the cart. LN 2 stated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-22 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
    Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the Interdisciplinary Team (IDT-a coordinated group of healthcare professionals who collaborate and plan resident care) failed to review psychotropic medications (medications that affect brain activity associated with mental processes and behavior) for one resident (Resident 8) out of a sample of 14 residents when a gradual dose reduction (GDR) was recommended but not completed.This failure resulted in the continued use of psychotropic medications without reassessment and placed the resident at risk for unnecessary drug exposure and associated adverse outcomes.A review of Resident 8's facesheet indicated admission to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Alzheimer's Disease (a progressive, irreversible brain disorder that gradually destroys memory, thinking skills and the ability to carry out daily tasks), Dementia (generalized term for decline in mental ability which is severe enough to interfere with daily life) without behavioral disturbance, psychotic disturbance,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-22 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the nursing staff failed to revise fall care plans for one resident (Resident 27) out 14 sampled residents when Resident 8's fall care plans were not updated after repeated falls.This failure decreased the facility's potential to prevent additional falls for both residents when Resident 27 to sustained additional falls with a minor injury.Findings:A review of Resident 27's facesheet indicated admission to the facility on 7/31/24 with diagnoses of collapsed vertebrae (the bony block of the spine breaks and collapses), age-related osteoporosis (bone disease characterized by decreased bone mass and density, making the bones weak and fragile) and repeated falls.A review of Resident 27's fall risk evaluations were reviewed. Each evaluation determined the probability of a resident falling based on their individual history, ambulation, vision, gait, blood pressure and medications. The following are the scores and fall risk category Resident 27 was placed into:4/3/26 - score 7 (not at risk)4/18/26 - score 9 (not at risk)A review of Resident 27's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-22 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the nursing staff failed to ensure necessary nail care services were provided to maintain good grooming and hygiene for one (Resident 6) of five sampled residents, when Resident 6 had long, untrimmed, and visibly dirty fingernails.This failure had the potential to expose Resident 6 to avoidable infection risks, skin breakdown, and injury from jagged or dirty nails.A review of Resident 6's admission record indicated he was last admitted in February 2023 with the diagnosis of Alzheimer's Disease (a disease characterized by a progressive decline in mental abilities).A review of Resident 6's Minimum Data Set (MDS- a federally mandated resident assessment tool), dated 12/18/25, indicated Resident 6 required extensive assistance of two for personal hygiene.During an observation on 5/19/26 at 9:41 a.m., Resident 6 was observed with poor nail hygiene. Resident 6's left hand displayed long, untrimmed fingernails with an accumulation of dark yellow brown debris underneath the free edges. The middle fingernail was jagged and broken along the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-22 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the nursing staff failed to ensure one resident (Resident 4) out of 14 sampled residents received appropriate care for a documented wound when the hospice (a specialized, compassionate model of end-of-life care focused on comfort, dignity, and quality of life rather than finding a cure) provider did not initiate treatment orders for Resident 4's excoriated (scraped or worn away), blistering (raw, sore skin) sacrum (an area located at the base of the spine and above the tailbone). This failure decreased the facility's potential to prevent infection and hinder continuous pain Resident 4 experienced as a result of the wound.Findings:A review of Resident 4's facesheet indicated Resident 4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with Senile Degeneration of the Brain (the progressive loss of brain cells and cognitive function associated with advanced aging).A review of Resident 4's hospice progress notes, dated 5/1/26, indicated Resident 4 was admitted to hospice care for senile…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-22 · tag F0699 — isolated
    Provide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the Social Services Director (SSD) failed to ensure one resident (Resident 13) of eight sampled residents received trauma-informed care when the SSD did not update Resident 13's Trauma Informed Care Assessment at least quarterly. This failure decreased the facility's potential to ensure Resident 13's nursing care needs were met.Findings:A review of Resident 13's admission record indicated admission in May 2022 with the diagnoses including Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD a chronic lung disease causing difficulty in breathing), Dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities) with psychotic disturbance, anxiety disorder, and bipolar disorder. A review of Resident 13's Minimum Data Set (MDS- a federally mandated resident assessment tool), dated 5/13/26, indicated she had mild memory impairment.A review of Resident 13's Trauma Informed Care Assessment, dated 3/7/24, identified no trauma related concerns. A review of Resident 13's care plan, initiated and last revised on 4/10/26, indicated Resident 13 was experiencing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-22 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the licensed nurse failed to ensure the medication error rate remained below 5 percent when four errors were observed during 29 medication administrations, which resulted in a 13.79% medication error rate. This failure decreased the facility's potential ensure the health and safety of residents by administering the correct dosage and effective therapeutic effect.Findings:During an observation of a medication administration on 5/20/26 at 7:57 a.m., Licensed Nurse 1 (LN 1) administered medications to Resident 48. The following errors were identified: Resident #48 received a complete pill and a half of a pill of carbidopa-levodopa from two medication cards (a container used to securely hold medications with a push-through aluminum foil back (a blister) that allows the distribution of medication one dose at a time) with another resident's name. Two errors were observed.In an interview on 5/20/26 at 8:21 a.m., LN 1 stated, They moved the cards, they weren't in the same place as they were before. I will double check next time the name and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 28 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-22 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one resident (Resident 28) of eight sampled residents remained free of significant medication errors when licensed nurses administered prescribed Parkinson's medications up to two hours late.This failure decreased the facility's potential to ensure medication was administered as ordered by the physician. Findings:A review of Resident 48's admission record indicated admission on 5/15 26 with a primary diagnosis of Parkinson's Disease (a progressive disease of the nervous system marked by tremor, muscular rigidity and slow, imprecise movements) without dyskinesia (uncontrolled, involuntary muscle movements) or without mention of fluctuations. A review of Resident 48's Minimum Data Set (MDS- a federally mandated resident assessment tool), dated 5/19/26, indicated he had no memory impairment.In an interview on 5/19/26 at 9:58 a.m. with Resident 48, Resident 48 stated, My [Parkinson's] medications are late. Over an hour the other day. A record review of Resident 48's Medication Administration Record (MAR)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-19 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure professional standards of practice were met for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) when neurological (neuro, relating to the nervous system, includes: brain, spinal cord, and nerves) assessments and vital signs (blood pressure, temperature, pulse, respirations, and oxygen saturation [a measurement of how much oxygen is being carried by red blood cells]) were not conducted, monitored, or documented after a witnessed fall, in Resident 1's medical record per facility policy and protocol.These failures decreased the facility's potential to recognize a change in condition for Resident 1, which could have led to a delay in treatment with other negative outcomes.A review of Resident 1's admission record indicated she was initially admitted to the facility in July 2024 with medical diagnosis which included collapsed vertebra (when the bones in the spine collapse or break due to injury or weakening) and repeated falls. A review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS-a federally mandated resident assessment tool)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-29 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set (MDS, a federally mandated resident assessment tool) assessment was accurate for one resident (Resident 1), when Resident 1's Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (POLST, a set of medical orders, based on a patient's preferences, that guide medical care for individuals with serious illnesses) form information was different from the information documented on Resident 1's MDS assessment.This failure could result in inappropriate care and treatment.Findings:A review of Resident 1's face sheet (front page of the chart that contains a summary of basic information about the resident) indicated an admission date of April2025 and she was her own responsible party (RP, a person who is designated in making decisions about health care and financial matters).A review of Resident 1s MDS assessment, dated [DATE], indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility with a medically complex condition (a broad category of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-29 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure one resident (Resident 1) received treatment and care in accordance with the facility's Infection Control policy for influenza (flu- an illness caused by a virus [a germ] that is spread from person to person) when: Licensed Nurses (LNs) did not notify Resident 1's doctor (MD) that Resident 1 had symptoms of the flu and a report of Resident 1had been exposed to a family member who tested positive for flu; LNs did not notify the MD the facility ran out of flu tests; LNs did not place Resident 1 on droplet precautions (measures implemented to prevent the spread of infection when a person who is infected with a pathogen [germs that cause disease] coughs, sneezes, or talks);These failures resulted in Resident 1's hospitalization from 4/27/25 up to 5/6/25 where she was diagnosed with Influenza A and Acute Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure (AHRF, a serious condition where the respiratory system can't maintain adequate oxygen levels in the blood,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-23 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to provide written notice of transfer to the Long-Term Care Ombudsman (an advocate for residents of nursing homes, board and care centers, and assisted living facilities) for two out of two sampled residents (Resident 1 and Resident 2), when they were transferred to the hospital in March of 2025 without the Ombudsman being notified. These failures could result in loss of residents ' advocacy and protection and prevent innapropriate transfers and discharges. Findings: During an interview on 4/23/25 at 3:14 p.m., the Director of Staff Development (DSD) stated she was not sure if the nurses were completing a written notice of transfer when residents were discharged or transferred to the hospital. The DSD also stated she was not sure whether the Ombudsman needed to be notified when residents were transferred to the hospital. During an interview on 4/23/25 at 3:30 p.m., the Administrator (Admin) stated she was not sure if the facility had to complete a written notice of transfer and notify the Ombudsman when…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-07-12 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — pattern
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not have a system to track staff compliance in required trainings, when: 1. Two of four sampled employees had mandatory trainings that were overdue (Licensed Staff K and Unlicensed Staff L). This finding had the potential to result in inadequate staff competency to care for the residents within professional standards or practice, poor quality of care, and harm to the residents of the facility. 2. The facility failed to provide a competent DSD to enforce training and verify competencies for Nursing staff when Unlicensed Staff F's (BLS) Basic Life Support Certification (CPR Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation the act of performing chest compressions and artificial respirations) was expired for 4.5 months while working in the facility. This failure had the potential to result in 30 out of 36 sampled residents needing CPR but not having access to a Certified CPR staff member to perform CPR. Findings: 1. During an interview on [DATE] at 11:00 a.m., with the Director of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-07-12 · tag F0732 — pattern
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the daily nursing staffing information was posted in a conspicuous place, during one of five days (7/08/24). This finding had the potential to result in inability for residents, visitors, and staff to review the staffing information, advocate for the residents' care, and identify issues with staffing numbers, which could have contributed to decreased quality of care. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview with the Director of Staff Development (DSD) on 7/08/24 at 9:20 a.m., the posting that included the nursing staffing information, posted on the wall across the nursing station of the facility, had staffing posting information from the previous Friday, 7/05/24. At the time of the observation, there was a lot of activity going on at the facility. More than 10 residents were observed in the dining area involved in recreational activities, and staff were busy with their morning work routines. The DSD confirmed the finding and stated the unit clerk was responsible for posting the nursing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-07-12 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — pattern
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Pharmacist's Drug Regimen Review (DRR/Medication Regimen Reviews- a monthly summary report of each resident's medication irregularities) report was acted upon with timely responses from Physicians and Medical Director. This failed practice had the potential to affect all residents currently receiving medications (36 of 36 residents) and placed them at risk for negative clinical outcomes due to a potential urgent action not being communicated in a timely fashion. Findings: During a review of the monthly Drug Regimen Review binder on 7/11/24, it was observed that monthly medication reviews conducted by the Consulting Pharmacist for the months of May and June showed no follow-up responses to recommendations made by the Consulting Pharmacist, and no documentation was present in the binder. Previous months (February, March, and April) Pharmacist recommendations for several residents was incomplete and did not show Physician responses or that follow-through was conducted. During an interview on 7/12/24 at 9:30 a.m.,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-12 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — pattern
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of fourteen sampled residents (Resident 16) was free of psychotropic drugs (Medications used to treat mental health disorders. These medications have many side and adverse effects) she did not need. This failure had the potential to result in adverse consequences such as medication interactions, depression, confusion, immobility, falls with fractures, and death. Findings: Record review indicated Resident 16 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with medical diagnoses including Dementia (A condition that affects memory) without Behavioral Disturbance (When a person is presenting signs and symptoms of dementia and has a dementia diagnosis, but they lack any symptoms of behavioral disturbances), and Repeated Falls (History of having suffered falls, which may indicate increased risk for future falls), according to the facility Face Sheet (Facility demographic). Record review of Resident 16's MDS (Minimum Data Sheet-An assessment…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-12 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the temperature of one of one medication refrigerators in the medication room of the facility (Medication Refrigerator A), was kept within normal parameters for several months, to store resident medications. The medication room where Medication Refrigerator A was stored, was observed propped open with a stool, unattended, prior to entering the room. In addition, one expired medication was found stored with active medications in one of the two medication carts (Medication Cart B, cart for the south hall), stored with other active medications. This failure had the potential to result in medications that were no longer effective, causing harm to the residents involved, and access to unauthorized personnel to the resident medications. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on [DATE] at 7:34 a.m., with the Director of Staff Development (DSD), the medication room door was observed propped open with a small stool, and no…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-07-12 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident records for 1 of 2 sampled residents that suffered multiple falls at the facility (Resident 190) were accurate. These documents consisted of the fall risk assessments for Resident 190, who suffered three falls at the facility, with two resulting in major injuries. As a result of the inaccurate responses in the fall risk assessments, one of these documents indicated Resident 190 was at low risk for falls, when that was not the case. This failure may have contributed to the lack of care planning and interventions to prevent further falls for Resident 190. It also had the potential to result in inability for staff to identify triggers and patterns necessary for fall prevention measures for Resident 190. Findings: Record review indicated Resident 190 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with medical diagnoses including History of Falling (History of having suffered falls, which may indicate increased risk for future falls), Alzheimer's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-07-12 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — pattern
    Have a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to follow their Infection Control policy and QAPI (Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement) policy for 36 out of 36 residents when the facility failed to track and surveil data for resident's chronic UTI (Urinary Tract Infections). This failure had the potential to result in residents developing MRDO (multidrug resistant organisms). Findings: During an interview with Licensed Staff A on 7/10/24 at 10:15 a.m., Licensed Staff A was queried for the QAPI documentation for tracking chronic UTI's in the facility. Licensed Staff A stated, I have not been tracking chronic UTI's. Licensed Staff A queried as to what the risks are to the resident population if the chronic UTI's in the building are not being tracked and surveilled. Licensed Staff A stated, the residents taking long term or frequent antibiotics could become resistant to antibiotics due to overuse. Licensed Staff A queried if she has tracked UTI data for QAPI and IDT conferences to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-12 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility did not follow their Enhanced Barrier Precautions policy and their Hand Hygiene Policy's when 1 resident (Resident 31) out of 36 sampled residents had a staff member who did not practice hand hygiene or correct isolation techniques while administering hygiene care to a resident on Enhanced Barrier isolation. Findings: During an observation on 7/8/24 at 9:00 a.m., outside room [ROOM NUMBER], observed an Enhanced Barrier Isolation Cart (a cart that contains gloves, alcohol, masks, and gowns for staff to wear while providing high contact (Hygiene and bathing) activities to residents. Unlicensed Staff F was observed in room [ROOM NUMBER] without a isolation gown providing hygiene care for Resident 31 who was incontinent of stool. Observed Unlicensed Staff F exiting Resident 31's room also without washing his hands or using hand sanitizer after caring for Resident 31. During an interview on 7/8/24 at 9:20 a.m., in the hallway outside room [ROOM NUMBER],…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-07-12 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — pattern
    Ensure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility did not provide three of four Unlicensed Staff (Unlicensed Staff N, Unlicensed Staff O & Unlicensed Staff P) with 12 hours of abuse and dementia training annually. This failure had the potential to result in inadequate staff competency to care for the residents within professional standards or practice, poor quality of care, and harm to the residents of the facility. Findings: During an interview with the Director of Staff Development (DSD) on 7/11/24 at 10:00 a.m., she was asked to provide evidence of abuse and dementia training from 7/10/23 to the present for four sampled Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs-Unlicensed Staff M, Unlicensed Staff N, Unlicensed Staff O & Unlicensed Staff P). During a concurrent interview and record review with the Director of Staff Development on 7/11/24 at 11:30 a.m., the DSD provided the requested documents. The documents provided indicated: 1) Unlicensed Staff M-She was still in orientation taking mandatory trainings. This was confirmed by the DSD during the interview on 7/11/24 at 11:30 a.m. 2)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-12 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of six sampled resident's (Resident 3) medical records were updated to show documentation that advance directives (written statement of a person's wishes regarding medical treatment made to ensure those wishes are carried out should the person be unable to communicate them to a doctor) were discussed and written information was provided to the resident and/or responsible parties and desire for physician orders for life sustaining treatment (POLST) were reviewed, signed and dated by a physician. This failure had the potential for the resident's wishes not to be honored during a medical emergency. Findings: A review of Resident 3's admission record indicated the resident was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses that included Pyonephrosis (an infection of the kidney with pus in the upper collecting system which can progress to obstruction), Calculus of the Kidneys (kidney stones), Sepsis of unspecified organism Bacteria, Hypokalemia, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-12 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the facility develop a resident-centered, comprehensive care plan for 1 of 14 sampled residents (Resident 18) with a stage 4 pressure ulcer (A pressure ulcer is a wound caused by prolonged pressure on an area of the skin. Stage 4 pressure ulcers are the most severe type of pressure ulcer, and can extend into muscle and/or tendons and bones). This had the potential to result in inability for the wound to heal, decline of Resident 18's medical condition, medical complications including the acquisition of serious infections and death. Findings: Record review indicated Resident 18 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with medical diagnoses including Pressure Ulcer of Left Heel, and Repeated Falls (History of having suffered falls, which may indicate increased risk for future falls), according to the facility Face Sheet (Facility demographic). During an observation on 7/08/24 at 11:30 a.m., Resident 18 was observed in his wheelchair,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-27 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure 1. staff knew the correct time frame for reporting abuse allegations and injury of unknown source (source of the injury was not observed by any person; the source of the injury could not be explained by the resident; and the injury is suspicious because of the extent of the injury or the location of the injury) to the state, the Ombudsman (a person who investigates, reports on, and helps settle complaints) and the local law enforcement. 2. staff knew what injury of unknown source was 3. staff knew who to report abuse allegations and injury of unknown source 4. there was an SOC 341 (a form that documents the information given by the reporting party on the suspected incident of abuse) and 5 day investigative summary report completed for a report on injury of unknown source for one out of three sampled residents (Resident 1) 5. the facility provides in its reports, sufficient information to describe the allegation of abuse for two out of 3…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2022-02-18 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — widespread
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents and staff knew the complaint and grievance process and posted grievance and complaint information in a manner accessible to all residents. This failure did not ensure residents rights to file a grievance and had the potential to delay the facility's identification and response to residents needs or complaints. Findings: During a resident council meeting on 2/17/22 at 11:00 a.m., the Resident attendees were asked if they knew how to file a grievance. The Residents stated, they did not know there was a grievance process or how to complete a grievance. When questioning the residents, they did not know where the forms were kept. The Resident stated if they have a problem or a complaint, they go to the DON or Social Services Director (SSD) for help. During an observation post Resident Council meeting on 2/17/22 at 12:30 p.m., a bulletin board located outside of the dining room contained resident rights, license certificates, and Ombudsman information. No other signage was posted on the bulletin…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2022-02-18 · tag F0655 — widespread
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to develop a baseline care plan for 5 out of 13 sampled residents (Resident 229, Resident 129, Resident 130, Resident 132, Resident 133) when: 1. Resident 229 had no baseline care plan for Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy (PEG-a device that allows nutrition, fluids and/or medications to be put directly into the stomach, bypassing the mouth and esophagus) Care Plan. This failure had the potential for Resident 229 not receiving adequate care because of staff not knowing what care to provide. 2. New admissions to the facility, Resident 129, Resident 130, Resident 132, and Resident 133, were all receiving skilled nursing care without an assessment of their care needs. This failure had to potential for needs to go unmet, continued health decline, and a lower quality of care for these residents. Findings: 1. During an observation on 2/14/22 at 3:21 p.m., Resident 229 was in bed, the head of the bed was elevated and a Tube feeding formula was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-02-18 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — widespread
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop comprehensive care plans for 3 sampled residents (Resident 14, Resident 20, and Resident 28) that were individualized and updated to show residents specific care related to their medical needs when: a. Resident 20 did not have a care plan for urinary catheterization. b. Resident 28 did not have a care plan for monitoring of antipsychotic medications and dementia behaviors c. Resident 14 did not have a Care Plan for Anti-Subluxation brace/sling (a medical device intended to protect the shoulder joint from partial dislocation cause by caused by paralysis or injury in the shoulder joint capsule). These failures possibly resulted in residents decline in health, harm, and negatively impact the residents' quality of care and services. Findings: a. During an interview on 2/15/22 at 11:13 a.m., Resident 20 stated nurses catheterize him about three times a day. A review of Resident 20's chart indicated there were no care plan with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2022-02-18 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — widespread
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide medications as ordered by the physician to one of six residents sampled for medication administration (Resident 129). This delayed acquisition resulted in Resident 129 to not receive 11 doses and increased his potential to develop complications. Findings: During an observation on 2/16/22 at 3:55 p.m., Staff H marked Resident 129's Alvesco aerosol inhaler (used to treat asthma) and stated, That medication is not available. A review of Resident 129's face sheet indicated he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] for diagnoses that included combined systolic and diastolic heart failure (a condition in which the heart does not pump blood as well as it should), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (a group of diseases that cause airflow blockage and breathing-related problems), and chronic respiratory failure (a condition in which your blood doesn't have enough oxygen or has too much carbon dioxide). A review of Resident 129's MAR (Medication…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2022-02-18 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — widespread
    Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop comprehensive action plans for identification, analysis, correction, and evaluation of systemic care issues, including high-risk, high-volume concerns, and repeat survey deficiencies. This failure had the potential to precent timely recognition and improvement of care services that do not meet standards for quality for all 31 residents. Findings: A review of the facility's CASPER 3 ([Certification and Survey Provider Enhanced Reporting] a report compiled of survey findings that demonstrate the facility's performance) indicated a pattern of repeat deficiencies related to quality of care and falls, from 2018 to 2019. During an interview on 2/18/22 at 2:59 p.m., Staff A stated QAPI meetings were conducted at least quarterly. Staff A stated that while the pandemic and staffing turnovers were a big focus for the facility in the last year, Staff A confirmed falls continue to be part of the facility's QAPI projects. A concurrent review of the binder titled QAPI, indicated attendance sheets and meeting minutes for 2020 and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-02-18 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — pattern
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure medication error rate was lower than 5% when staff made five medication errors out of 27 opportunities. This failure resulted in a medication error rate of 18.5%, which had the potential of unsafe provision of medications to residents. Findings: During an observation on 2/16/22 at 8:32 a.m., after checking Resident 300's vital signs, Staff D dispensed the following medications into a medicine cup: 1. One tablet of Carvedilol (used to treat high blood pressure), 2. One tablet of Methenamine (used to treat or prevent urinary tract infections), 3. One tablet of Aspirin (used to ease pain and/or prevent blood clots), and 4. One tablet of Sodium Chloride (used to treat low sodium levels in the blood). Staff D knocked on the door, entered the room and handed Resident 300 the medicine cup and a glass of water. Staff D looked on as Resident 300 drank the pills, then exited the room. During an observation on 2/16/22 at 9:13 a.m., Staff D dispensed the following medications into a medicine cup: 1. One capsule of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-02-18 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — pattern
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement clinical criteria protocols, infection surveillance protocols, and antibiotic use protocols that promoted antibiotic stewardship. These failures had the potential for inconsistent and ineffective antibiotic stewardship (a coordinated program that promotes the appropriate use of antimicrobials [including antibiotics], improves patient outcomes, reduces microbial resistance, and decreases the spread of infections caused by multidrug-resistant organisms) services for all residents in the facility. Findings: During an interview on 2/18/22, at 10:40 a.m., with Staff W, she confirmed she was the facility Infection Preventionist. Staff W stated she worked as a floor nurse 3 shifts a week. Staff W stated the other 2 days her priority was infection control. Staff W stated she was working on the facility's infection surveillance for December. Staff W stated she had not had time to complete January's surveillance. Staff W stated she would be verbally informed by the Director of Nurses (DON) if there was a new…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-02-18 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — pattern
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure 3 out of 5 sampled residents (Resident 133 Resident 129 and Resident 28) immunization status was assessed and accurately documented in their medical record. These failures had the potential to result in higher risk for infection due to lack of immunization or side effects from an additional dose of vaccine been given. Findings: During a review of the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) for Resident 133, the pneumonia immunization status was blank. The EMR had no indication to show the facility had offered the vaccine. The EMR had no indication if Resident 133 was already vaccinated or had refused. During a review of the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) for Resident 28, the pneumonia immunization status was blank. The EMR had no indication to show the facility had offered the vaccine. The EMR had no indication if Resident 28 was already vaccinated or had refused. During a concurrent interview and record review, on 2/18/2,2 at 11:12 a.m., with Staff W, she reviewed Resident 28's immunization status and stated the pneumonia…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-02-18 · tag F0685 — isolated
    Assist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure assistive devices for vision was provided for one resident (Resident 26). This failure resulted in the resident not having vision assistance to read (an activity the resident enjoys) and could contribute to his increased incidents of falls. Findings: During an observation and concurrent interview on 2/14/2022 at 10:00 a.m., Resident 26 was resting in bed. When speaking with the resident, he did not respond to questions asked, but said, Thank-you when the Surveyor was leaving the room. During an interview on 2/14/2022 at 11:00 a.m., Staff G was asked about Resident 26 condition. Staff G stated Resident 26 speaks mostly Russian and very little English. The staff watches him closely because he has had an increased number of falls. Resident 26 was observed in his wheelchair motoring around the hallway. During an interview on 2/16/2022 at 1:35 p.m., Resident (26's) daughter stated her father had an ophthalmology visit last year and the Ophthalmologist told her he needed glasses due to a decline in his…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-02-18 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to monitor, re-evaluate, and document clinical rationale for continued use of a psychotropic drug for one of five sampled residents for medication regimen review (Resident 13) despite the resident not exhibiting behaviors the medication was originally prescribed for. This failure placed Resident 13 at a higher risk for adverse side effects associated with psychotropic medications. Findings: During an observation on 2/14/22 at 11:13 a.m., Resident 13 was asleep in bed. During an interview on 2/14/22 at 11:15 a.m., Private Staff stated he was Resident 13's private caregiver for a few months now and provides care and companionship for four hours during the day, five days a week. When queried about Resident 13's condition, Private Staff stated, He has dementia. He's very nice, just very confused. A review of Resident 13's face sheet indicated he was last admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included Parkinson's disease (a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-02-18 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe medication storage when: 1. Expired medications, including an eye drop belonging to one unsampled resident (Resident 2) were found in medication storage, and 2. Temperature logs were not maintained in the medication refrigerator. These failures had the potential for contamination and altered integrity of stored medications. Findings: During an observation on 2/15/22 at 3:29 p.m., an opened, multi-dose bottle of Latanoprost (a medication used to lower high eye pressure) belonging to Resident 2 was found inside a drawer of Medication Cart 2. The eye drop bottle, dated 12/26, had an affixed label that read, *DISCARD 6 WEEKS AFTER OPENING*. During an interview with Staff B and Staff G on 2/15/22 at 3:44 p.m., Staff C stated 12/26 was the date when the medication was opened. Staff C confirmed the discard instructions and stated, This [bottle] should have been discarded last week. Staff B then proceeded to dispose of the bottle.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$103,054 in federal fines across 2 penalties. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

  • $54,421 — penalty dated 2024-07-12
  • $48,633 — penalty dated 2023-09-27
  • Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-08-09 for 14 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
BIKLE, DANIELIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2019
FLYNN, ANDREAIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2023
GORDON, PETERIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2021
HARMON, ROBERTIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2020
HINES, JANETIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2023
IMWALLE, BRITTANYIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2024
JOACHIM, CAROLINEIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2025
LUCACCINI, MARGARETIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2022
MEISLIN, VERAIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2022
MILLER, BURTONIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2024
POLLACK, KENDRAIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2024
RAND, DAVIDIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2024
REYNOLDS, ROBERTIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2020
RONALD, RICHARDIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2021
SMITH, LAURAIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2023
RUTH-ISLAS, KYLEIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 11/14/2022
YUO, HOLLYIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/18/2024
THE REDWOODS, A COMMUNITY OF SENIORSOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/28/2025
DAVIDENKO, ELENAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 09/30/2024
PICETTI, DOMINICIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/07/2025

CMS files one row per role, so the 25 rows in the source record cover these 20 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$23.5M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-0.2%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 3%Medicare 2%Other / private 95%

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$436per resident / day
operating cost
$13,261per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$435per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in California
$12,167/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$15,178/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,000/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 555826. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-05-22, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next