No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Millbrae Care Center

33 Mateo Avenue, Millbrae, CA 94030 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 140 certified beds · (650) 689-5784 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (650) 689-5784 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citations — no harm found (F0607, F0609, F0610) — most recent May 20262 actual-harm citations$7,045 in federal fines
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

In its favor
  • lower-than-typical staff turnover (32% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
Worth asking about
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has 2 actual-harm citations
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (60) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $7,045 in federal fines (most recent 2024-01-03)
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 2 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★★ 5/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
138 El Camino Real · (650) 692-7226 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
Walgreens0.3 mi
615 Broadway · (650) 697-0166 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
379 El Camino Real
Park
301 Santa Paula Ave · (650) 259-2374 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 2 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 3 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 2 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased16.9%10.2%15.4%typical
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight2.4%4.0%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder2.2%0.8%0.9%worse
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection1.1%1.2%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms1.1%7.3%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.4%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury1.8%1.6%3.3%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened14.0%9.8%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication3.9%13.7%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine87.4%98.2%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers3.5%4.3%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control18.2%10.2%21.2%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table12.3%12.0%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.3%1.5%1.4%typical
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine56.2%93.2%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission21.3%23.0%22.6%typical
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit10.3%11.2%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.762.251.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days2.431.571.80worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

41.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 66 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

41.4%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.6%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
44.0%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.17U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.09hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.06hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.02hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 44.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 25 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.17 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 16% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 13% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF41.4%CMS range 31.5–54.751.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.6%CMS range 7.8–15.510.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge44.0%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge60.0%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge28.0%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened3.3%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization8.1%CMS range 4.6–13.17.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.931.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.39
RN hours/ resident / day
1.03
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.78
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.20
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.26
RN hoursweekends
31.7%
Total nursing turnover
31.3%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 140 beds and averages 135.9 residents a day — about 97% occupied, or roughly 4 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.20 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.39 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.78 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.77 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.37 on weekdays — 18% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.44 to 0.26 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 32% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

13
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-05-08)
8
at the previous standard inspection (2024-10-17)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

60 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 48 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-01-11 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to effectively assess weight loss, revise, and implement therapeutic interventions for one of one sampled resident (Resident 19) when Resident 19 had an unplanned weight loss. The facility's failure resulted to Resident 19 to experience a gradual, unintended, progressive weight loss overtime. Findings: A review of the facility's Policy and Procedure (P&P) titled Weight and Assessment Interventions dated 11/2017, indicated, the threshold for significant and unplanned and undesired weight loss will be 5% after a month, 7.5% after 3 months, and 10% after 6 months. The P&P further indicated, .Any weight change of 5% or more since the last weight assessment will be retaken the next day for confirmation .nursing will immediately notify the Registered Dietitian (RD). The RD will review the unit weight record every month to follow individual weight trends overtime. Negative trends will be evaluated by the interdisciplinary team. Individualized care plan shall address to the extent possible the identified causes of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2021-12-03 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to effectively assess or develop therapeutic interventions including but not limited to implementation of a therapeutic diet for one of two sampled residents (Resident 35). This failure resulted in Resident 35 experiencing severe weight loss. Findings: Weight loss in nursing home residents is linked to poor outcomes, including higher rates of hospitalization and death (American Journal of Nursing, 2008). Facility policy titled Weight Assessment & Interventions dated 11/17 described the threshold for significant unplanned and undesired weight loss as 5% (percent) after 1 month; 7.5% within 3 months and 10% within 6 months. The facility policy also guided staff that if any documented weight change was 5% or more since the last weight assessment, a reweigh would occur and the Registered Dietitian (RD) would be immediately notified. The process also indicated the RD will review unit weight records monthly and follow individual trends over time.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-06-25 · tag F0711 — pattern
    Ensure the resident's doctor reviews the resident's care, writes, signs and dates progress notes and orders, at each required visit.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the attending physician reviewed the resident's total program of care and failed to write, sign, and date progress notes as required for 3 out of 12 sampled residents (Residents 1, 2, and 3). This failure had the potential to result in the residents not receiving timely evaluation of their medical regimen and necessary adjustments to treatments, placing the residents at risk for unmet medical needs and a decline in physical, mental, or psychosocial well being.During a review of Resident 1's Electronic Medical Record (EHR), the Resident 1's EHR indicated Resident 1 was admitted on [DATE] and has a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) Summary Score of 14 as of 06/01/2026. The Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) is a short assessment used in nursing facilities to evaluate a resident's memory and thinking abilities. A score of 13 to 15 indicates intact cognition, meaning the resident is thinking clearly, remembers well, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-06-25 · tag F0712 — pattern
    Ensure that the resident and his/her doctor meet face-to-face at all required visits.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure required face to face physician visits were conducted and that the corresponding documentation was completed and maintained in the residents' medical records, as required, for 5 of 12 sampled residents (Residents 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5). This failure has the potential to result in negative outcomes for residents, including delays in identifying changes in condition, missed opportunities for timely medical interventions, unmanaged or worsening chronic conditions, increased risk of avoidable hospitalizations or emergency department visits, inadequate medication management, and overall decline in residents' health status due to lack of timely clinical oversight.During a review of Resident 1's Electronic Medical Record (EHR), the Resident 1's EHR indicated Resident 1 was admitted on [DATE] and has a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) Summary Score of 14 as of 06/01/2026. The Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) is a short assessment used in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-05-08 · tag F0640 — widespread
    Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure accurate and timely encoding and transmission of resident assessments for 18 of 116 sampled residents. The facility did not encode the Minimum Data Set (MDS, It's a detailed check up form the nursing home fills out to understand what a resident needs and to plan the right care) assessments within the required timeframe and did not ensure successful transmission to the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) database.This failure to complete and transmit required resident assessment data resulted in incomplete clinical information being available for care planning, increased risk of inaccurate care plans, and potential negative impact on each resident's ability to receive individualized, person centered care.During a concurrent interview and review on 5/6/26 at 2:56 PM with MDS nurse, Resident 71's quarterly MDS with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD, specific endpoint for the look-back periods in the MDS assessment process) of 2/12/26 was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-05-08 · tag F0638 — pattern
    Assure that each resident’s assessment is updated at least once every 3 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Minimum Data Set (MDS, a resident assessment tool) quarterly assessment was completed at least every 92 days following the previous OBRA (Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1987) assessment for six of 19 sampled residents (Resident 71, Resident 73, Resident 94, Resident 111, Resident 121, and Resident 16).Failure to complete quarterly resident assessment within the required timeframe could result in delayed identification of needs and significant issues that may affect the physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of the residents.1. Review of Resident 71's admission record indicated, was admitted to the facility on [DATE].Review of Resident 71's quarterly MDS with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD, specific endpoint for the look-back periods in the MDS assessment process) of 11/14/25 indicated, the assessment was signed by the RN assessment coordinator as complete on 12/17/25, 33 days after the ARD.During concurrent interview and record…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-08 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement person centered care plans for two (2) of 28 sampled residents (Residents 12, 120, and 130) when:Resident 12 did not have a care plan for limited range of motion, despite being ordered Restorative Nursing services (person-centered programs designed to help patients maintain or improve their highest level of physical, mental, and psychosocial independence)Resident 130 received 5 L/min of oxygen instead of the prescribed 2 L/min, contrary to the care plan and physician orders.These deficient practices had the potential to result in unmet care needs, inadequate supervision, and failure to provide services in accordance with physician orders and individualized assessments.2. During initial pool observation on 5/4/2026 at 2:19PM, Resident 130 was noted to be receiving 5 L/min of oxygen. During an interview on 05/06/2026 at 11:41 AM with LVN 2, LVN 2 stated, Resident 130 is using 2 L of oxygen therapy, but sometimes, asked…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-08 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure prescription medications and biologicals were labeled and stored according to manufacturer's instructions and facility policy and procedures, as evidenced by the following:A bottle of Dabigatran etexilate (a prescription oral blood thinner) capsule and one vial of multi-dose Heparin Sodium 5,000 unit/mL (a fast-acting injectable anticoagulant used to prevent blood clots) were opened and undated.Residents and staff personal items such as pouch, jewelry, hearing aid, dentures, cellphones, cellphone charger, eyeglasses, and iPad were stored in the controlled medication compartment of Medication Carts #4 & #1.Two vials of Tubersol (Tuberculin Purified Protein Derivative-a sterile, standardized solution used primarily for Mantoux tuberculin skin testing) in the refrigerator in Station 1 medication storage room were opened and undated.These failures increased the risk of administering expired, contaminated, or improperly stored…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-08 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to report allegations of abuse involving Resident 160 to the State Survey Agency, as required by facility policy and federal regulations.Failure to promptly report allegations of abuse had the potential to place residents at risk for unaddressed harm and compromise the facility's duty to protect residents' health, safety, and rights.Review of Resident 160's admission record indicated, was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included a heart attack, a urinary tract infection, type 2 diabetes (high blood sugar), left lower leg closed fracture, and Alzheimer's disease (memory loss and confusion).Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] indicated the Resident 160's cognition was moderately impaired.During a concurrent interview and record review on 5/8/26 at 1:29 PM, the Registered Nurse Supervisor (RNS) reviewed Resident 160's progress notes titled Nurses Notes. The entry dated 3/15/26 at 3:15 PM indicated the resident was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-08 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to conduct a thorough investigation of an allegation of abuse involving Resident 160.This failure had the potential to place residents at risk for unaddressed harm and compromised the facility's duty to protect residents' health and safety.Review of Resident 160's admission record indicated, was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included a heart attack, a urinary tract infection, type 2 diabetes (high blood sugar), left lower leg closed fracture, and Alzheimer's disease (memory loss and confusion).Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] indicated the Resident 160's cognition was moderately impaired.During a concurrent interview and record review on 5/8/26 at 1:29 PM, the Registered Nurse Supervisor (RNS) reviewed Resident 160's progress notes titled Nurses Notes. The entry dated 3/15/26 at 3:15 PM indicated the resident was discharged home with the daughter on 3/15/26 at 2:40 PM.Further review of the Nurses Notes dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-08 · tag F0628 — isolated
    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure proper notification when residents are discharged , when one of three residents, Resident 158 went home, Ombudsman was not notified. This failure could put a resident with no protection and an advocate to inform them of options and rights with regards to discharge.Findings:During a review of Resident 158's admission Record, dated 5/8/26, indicated, admitted [DATE] with diagnoses including Cellulitis( infection of wound) of back, Depression ( a health condition with feeling of sadness, low energy). During a concurrent interview and record review on 5/7/26 at 11 AM, with RN 1, per RN 1, resident is alert and oriented x 4. Went out of facility on 2/2/26, did not return, did not sign Out On Pass (OOP) form. Staff calling patient and son but not answering. On 2/3/26, no call and not returned yet till 2/3/26 at 11 AM, resident came back to gather her belongings and does not want to stay. Per patient, she went to her friend's house, fell asleep coz she…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-08 · tag F0636 — isolated
    Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the annual Minimum Data Set (MDS, a resident assessment tool) was completed within the required period of 14 calendar days of Assessment Reference Date (ARD, specific endpoint for the look-back periods in the MDS assessment process) for two of 19 sampled residents (Resident 73 and Resident 111).Failure to complete a comprehensive resident assessment within the required timeframe could result in delayed identification of needs and significant issues that may affect the physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of Resident 73 and Resident 111.1. Review of Resident 73's admission record indicated, was admitted to the facility on [DATE].Review of Resident 73's annual MDS assessment with an ARD of 2/11/26, indicated, the assessment was signed by the Registered Nurse (RN) assessment coordinator as complete on 5/5/26, 83 days after the ARD. During a concurrent record review and interview on 5/6/26 at 3:06 PM, the MDS nurse reviewed Resident 73's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 48 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-08 · tag F0637 — isolated
    Assess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete a Significant Change in Status Assessment (SCSA, is a comprehensive assessment for a resident that must be completed when the IDT (interdisciplinary team, a collaborative group of professionals from diverse fields who work together interdependently to achieve shared goals) has determined that a resident meets the significant change guidelines for either major improvement or decline) for one of 19 sampled residents (Resident 73) who was admitted to hospice care on 11/5/25.This failure could potentially delay the provision of appropriate treatment and services for Resident 73.Review of Resident 73's admission record indicated, was admitted to hospice on 11/5/25 with diagnoses including heart failure, high blood pressure, and dementia (a group of symptoms affecting memory, thinking and social abilities).Review of Resident 73's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a resident assessment tool) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD, specific endpoint for the look-back periods in the MDS assessment process) 11/12/25, indicated, a SCSA…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-08 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews and record reviews, the facility did not collaborate with Hospice the plan of care for two out of five residents (Residents 27and 16)This failure could result to residents not receiving care as planned.During a review of Resident 27's admission Record, dated 5/6/26, the admission record indicated, admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including: Alzheimer's Disease( a progressive, irreversible brain disorder that destroys memory and thinking), Osteoarthritis of Knees(a common form of arthritis). During an observation on 5/5/26 at 11 AM, observed resident up on wheelchair, smiling, not responding to questions. During an interview on 5/5/26 at 11 AM with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 4, stated, she has been her permanent CNA for many years. Since after her fall, she is now in wheelchair, can still walk to the bathroom with assistance. She is now under Hospice Care since last month. She had no changes, eats with good appetite, 100 % of meals, no skin breaks. She has family but only…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-08 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement their smoking policy and procedures (P&P) when it allowed two of eight residents (Resident 4 and Resident 81) who smoked in the facility to keep possession of their own lighters and cigarettes inside the resident care area.This failure posed an increased risk for combustion and/or fire, resulting in the potential for serious injury and/or death to residents, staff, and visitors.During an interview on 05/06/2026, at 12:20 PM, at Resident 4's room with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 2, LVN 2 stated, the orange plastic tube with liquid inside found on the overbed table beside the resident's bed is a disposable cigarette lighter used by Resident 4 for smoking. LVN 2 further stated, there is a smoking schedule, but Resident 4 does not follow it. LVN 2 stated, Resident 4 keeps his cigarette in his room. LVN 2 is not sure about the facility's policy regarding safekeeping of cigarettes and lighters and if Resident 4 was educated about…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-08 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that respiratory care and services were provided as required for two of six sampled residents (Resident 130 and Resident 4). The facility did not provide appropriate supervision during the residents' nebulizer treatments (A nebulizer treatment is a process in which a machine turns liquid medication into a mist that the resident breathes in through a mask or mouthpiece to help improve breathing).This failure resulted in the residents not receiving respiratory treatment in accordance with the facility's policy, procedure, and individualized care plans, placing the residents at risk for unmet respiratory needs. During an observation on 5/4/2026 at 2:30 PM at Resident 130 room, Resident 130 was found sleeping with the nebulizer tubing on the resident's chest. The nebulizer machine was on the bed beside the resident, and the machine was still on. During a concurrent interview and observation on 5/4/2026 at 2:32PM in front of room [ROOM…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-08 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement its infection control program when:Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 4 did not perform hand hygiene when handling soiled linens and entering resident rooms.Residents and staff personal items such as pouch, jewelry, hearing aid, dentures, cellphones, phone charger, eyeglasses, and iPad were stored in the controlled medication compartment of the medication cart.Foreign currency was kept in the top drawer of the Medication Cart #4, alongside opened bottles of over the counter oral medications, epinephrine injections (the primary emergency treatment for severe allergic reactions), and suppositories (medications administered through the rectum, vagina, or urethra).These failures had the potential for cross contamination of infection that can compromise the health and safety of residents and staff.1. During an observation on 5/4/26 at 2:54 PM in the hallway, CNA 4 was seen exiting a resident's room that had an Enhanced Barrier Precaution (are an infection control intervention designed to reduce…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-28 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to develop a person-centered care plan for two of two sampled residents (Resident 1, and Resident 2) when:Smoking and going out on pass (when a resident leaves the facility temporarily) was not addressed for Resident 1.Going out on pass was not addressed for Resident 2. The facility failure had the potential for the residents not to receive necessary care and services. A review of the face sheet indicated Resident 1 was admitted with diagnoses including heart failure (when the heart muscles do not pump as strong as it should) and diabetes (abnormally high blood sugar level).A review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS, a standard assessment tool) dated 1/15/26, indicated Resident 1 was cognitively intact. The MDS further indicated Resident 1 was independent with all aspects of activities of daily living (ADL).During a concurrent interview and record review on 1/28/26, at 1:47 PM, with Registered Nurse (RN) 1, the physician order for 1/2026, indicated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-28 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to update the care plan for one of one sampled resident (Resident 3) after Resident 3 had two fall incidents.The failures had the potential to put the resident at risk of not receiving appropriate care. A review of the face sheet indicated Resident 3 was admitted with diagnoses including dementia (decline in memory or decision-making ability), muscle weakness, and abnormalities in gait (how a person walks) and mobility.A review of the Interdisciplinary Team notes dated 1/20/26, indicated Resident 3 had two fall incidents on 1/14/26.During a concurrent observation and interview on 1/28/26, at 12:49 PM, with Resident 3, Resident 3 was sitting up in a wheelchair in the hallway, alert, verbally responsive, calm and pleasant. Resident 3 was able to state his name. Resident 3 did not know his current location and the reason for residing in the facility. When asked about the fall incidents, Resident 3 stated he was feeling sleepy, had tried to walk, and needed to use the bathroom. During an interview on 1/28/26, at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-04 · tag F0745 — failed to provide medically-related social services — pattern
    Provide medically-related social services to help each resident achieve the highest possible quality of life.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, facility staff failed to provide social service-related services to 14 of 14 sample residents (Residents: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, and 14) when there was only one social worker (SW 1) in the building and quarterly care conference meetings for at least 14 residents were not completed during the period of March 2025 to June 2025. This failure had the potential to result in residents not receiving appropriate and personalized care. Findings: The census on 06/04/2025 was 128 residents. During an interview on 06/04/2025 at 12:10 PM, SW 1 stated she was the only social worker in the building for approximately three months (March to June 2025). SW 1 stated with the facility workload, she was unable to coordinate and conduct IDT (interdisciplinary team) /care conference meetings. SW 1 explained that IDT meetings were attended by a variety of healthcare professionals, like nurses, therapists, social workers, and others, to discuss and manage resident care. During these meetings family members and/or responsible parties were invited to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-19 · tag F0557 — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to manage residents ' belongings for Resident 1, 2, and 3, three of 6 sampled residents. Facility staff did not: 1. Follow facility policy in identifying/marking residents ' belongings. 2. Have a facility policy to periodically update resident inventory. These failures resulted in Resident 1 and 3 with missing belongings. Findings: Review of Resident 3 ' s medical records titled INVENTORY OF PERSONAL EFFECTS, dated 02/10/2023, indicated he was admitted with two shirts, two sweaters, and a pair of white mitt/glove. During a concurrent observation and interview with the Certified Nursing Assistant 1 (CNA) caring for Resident 3, on 05/19/2025 at 2:00 PM, CNA 1 looked through Resident 3 ' s belongings and stated he had 14 white tee shirts, and four dark tee shirts. None of the clothing were marked to identify these clothing belonged to Resident 3. CNA stated all of Resident 3 ' s clothing were donated, and he has no idea what happened to Resident 3 ' s clothing/personal belongings identified during admission.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-17 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain a system for preventing infection for 3 (Resident #81, #21, and #116) of 24 sampled residents. Specifically, the facility failed to disinfect Resident #81's mattress after staff stepped on the mattress and disinfect a blood pressure cuff after resident use and prior to use for Resident #21 and Resident #116. Findings included: 1. A facility policy titled, Enhanced Barrier Precaution, dated 06/2022, revealed, Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) are an infection control intervention designed to reduce transmission of resistant organisms that employs targeted gown and glove use during high contact resident care activities. EBP may be indicated (when Contact Precautions do not otherwise apply) for residents with any of the following: - Wounds or indwelling medical devices, regardless of MDRO colonization status. - Infection or colonization with an MDRO. The policy indicated, Use EBP for high-contact resident care activities by using…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-10-17 · tag F0926 — failed to keep the home smoke-free / fire-safe — pattern
    Have policies on smoking.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility document and policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents did not smoke in non-designated areas not equipped with needed safety equipment and devices. In addition, the facility failed to enforce their smoking policy regarding the storage of lighters for 2 (Resident #39 and Resident #106) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for smoking. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all 7 residents identified by the facility as smokers. Findings included: A facility policy titled, Smoking Policy - Residents, released 06/2022, indicated, 1. Prior to, or upon admission, residents shall be informed about any limitations on smoking, including designated smoking areas, and the extent to which the facility can accommodate their smoking or non-smoking preferences; for example, in making room assignments. The policy revealed, 5. Metal containers, with self-closing cover devices, shall be available in smoking areas. The policy further revealed, 12. Smoking articles for residents with independent smoking privileges: a.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-17 · tag F0640 — isolated
    Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, facility policy review, and review of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument [RAI] 3.0 User's Manual, the facility failed to complete a discharge Minimum Data Set (MDS) for 1 (Resident #108) of 3 residents reviewed for closed records. Specifically, the facility failed to complete a discharge MDS assessment for Resident #108, after the resident was discharged to a hospital on [DATE]. Findings included: A facility policy titled, Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment Schedule, dated 10/2023, indicated, 1. The facility conducts a comprehensive assessment to identify patient's needs per the guidelines set by the RAI Manual. The policy specified MDS assessments, including g. Discharge Assessments, would be completed based on the guidelines set by the RAI Manual. The policy revealed, 5. The MDS nurse or RN [Registered Nurse] MDS Coordinator will be responsible for ensuring timely completion of all MDS assessments. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-17 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, record review, facility policy review, and review of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument [RAI] 3.0 User's Manual, the facility failed to ensure a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment was accurately coded to reflect the presence of behaviors for 1 (Resident #93) of 2 residents reviewed for behaviors. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure behavioral symptoms exhibited during the seven-day look-back period were coded on Resident #93's 08/23/2024 quarterly MDS. Findings included: A facility policy titled, Minimum Data Set (MDS) Accuracy, dated 10/2023, revealed, The facility shall establish a system in which MDS accuracy is checked to assure that each patient receives an accurate assessment by staff that are qualified to assess relevant care areas and are knowledgeable of the resident's status, needs, strength and areas of potential or actual decline. The policy revealed, 6. The IDT [interdisciplinary team] will verify coding accuracy of residents that triggered in the Resident Level Quality…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-17 · tag F0644 — isolated
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to resubmit a Level I Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) for 1 (Resident #71) of 3 residents reviewed for PASRR requirements after receiving a letter that indicated a Level II Mental Health Examination was not scheduled and to reopen the case, a new Level I Screening would need to be submitted. Findings included: A facility policy titled, Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review, dated 12/2017, revealed, PURPOSE To ensure that all facility applicants are screened for mental illness and/or intellectual disability prior to admission and to ensure this assessment effort is coordinated with the appropriate state agencies if indicated. Preadmission Screening and Resident Review [PASRR] is a federal requirement to help ensure that individuals who have a mental disorder or intellectual disabilities are not inappropriately placed in nursing home for long term care. The policy further specified, h. A positive Level I screen necessitates an in-depth evaluation of the individual by the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-17 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure medications were not left at the bedside for 1 (Resident #21) of 5 residents observed during medication administration. Specifically, facility staff left medications at the bedside of a resident who had impaired eyesight and had not been assessed as safe to self-administer medications. Findings included: A facility policy titled, Medication Administration, dated 09/2028, revealed the section titled, Medication Administration specified, 4. Medications are to be administered at the time they are prepared. 5. The person who prepares the dose for administration is the person who administers the dose. The policy further specified, 15. Residents are allowed to self-administer medications when specifically authorized by the prescriber, the nursing care center's Interdisciplinary Team (IDT), and in accordance with procedures for self-administration of medication and state regulations, and 19. For residents not in their rooms or otherwise unavailable to receive medication on the pass,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-17 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — isolated
    Provide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to obtain laboratory services in a timely manner for 1 (Resident #15) of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Specifically, Resident #15 had an order to check their Keppra (an anticonvulsant) level every six months. The facility failed to obtain the resident's Keppra level in September 2024, six months after the previous level was obtained. Findings included: The facility policy titled, Physician Orders, dated December 2016, indicated, Physician orders are obtained to provide a clear direction in the care of the resident. During an interview on 10/16/2024 at 1:02 PM, the Administrator stated the facility did not have a policy regarding laboratory services. An admission Record revealed the facility initially admitted Resident #15 on 11/04/2022 and most recently admitted the resident on 02/18/2024. According to the admission Record, the resident had a medical history that included diagnoses of convulsions and epilepsy. A significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-08-05 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — pattern
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that a Registered Nurse (RN) completed the assessments to seven of nine sampled residents (Resident 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7) when the residents had a change in condition. The facility deficient practice has the potential harm on the resident safety and well-being. Findings: A review of the facility fall incidents on 8/5/24, indicated Residents 1,2,3,4,5,6, and 7 had fall incidents. During an interview on 8/5/24 at 1:02 PM, the Director of Nursing (DON) reviewed the post fall assessments and stated, the assessments for Residents 1,2,3,4,5,6, and 7 were completed by Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 1,2,3,4, and 5. During an interview on 8/6/24, at 4:30 PM, the Administrator stated, If an LVN is assigned to the resident, the LVN performs the post fall assessment and evaluate the resident for injury. The Registered Nurse is not necessarily present. During a review of the job description for LVN dated 5/2017, indicated, .Under the direct supervision of a registered nurse, implement and established plan of care for each…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-07 · tag F0745 — failed to provide medically-related social services — isolated
    Provide medically-related social services to help each resident achieve the highest possible quality of life.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide medically-related social services to one of 3 sampled residents (Resident 1) when there was no social worker available from 4/22/24 to 5/10/24. This failure had the potential not to maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of Resident 1. Findings: Review of Resident 1's clinical record indicated, Resident 1 was originally admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including peripheral vascular disease (a slow and progressive disorder of the blood vessels), heart failure (a condition that develops when your heart doesn't pump enough blood for your body's needs), and diabetes mellitus (high blood sugar). He was transferred to a hospital on 5/3/24, then readmitted to the facility on [DATE], then discharged to the hospital on 5/20/24. Review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS, resident assessment tool), dated 5/13/24 indicated, Resident 1 was cognitively intact. During an interview on 6/6/24 at 4:24 PM with Ombudsman…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-11 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure the allegation of resident to resident abuse was promptly reported to the State Agency (SA, which is the California Department of Public Health) in accordance with the facility policy and procedure for one of four sampled residents Resident 1. Failure to promptly report allegation of abuse has potential for further abuse to happen thereby increasing the harm to the resident. Findings: Record review of Resident 1's admission Record, dated 4/10/24, indicated, admitted to facility on 9/21/23 with diagnoses including: Seizures ( Involuntary body twitching), Alcohol dependence with Withdrawal, Major Depression. Resident 1 went Against Medical Advice (AMA) on 9/25/23. During a review of facility document, Investigative Report, dated 9/30/23, indicated, Resident 1 is alert and oriented, self-responsible, ambulatory with Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14. On 9/25/23 at 3PM, Resident 1 discharged from the facility against medical…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-11 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide supervision to ensure safety for one of one sampled resident (Resident 3) when Resident 3 was found outside the facility unaccompanied. The facility's failure had the potential for resident harm. Resident 3 was admitted with diagnoses including dementia (a decline in memory or other thinking abilities). A review of Minimum Data Set (MDS, a standard assessment tool) dated 2/23/24, Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS, a brief memory test to help determine cognitive function (includes learning, thinking, and decision-making abilities) score of 5 indicated severe cognitive impairment (rarely makes decision). MDS also indicated Resident 3 has wandering behavior. During observation on 4/11/24, at 11:45 AM, Resident 3 was alert, smiling. Resident 3 got out of bed and ambulated to the bathroom. Resident 3 speaks a non-English language. A review of the Interdisciplinary Team (IDT) notes dated 1/8/24, indicated, Resident 3 walked out of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-01-11 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — widespread
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide preventive treatment and services to maintain and improve range of motion (ROM, the extent or limit to which a part of the body can be moved) for 18 of 18 sampled residents (Resident 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18,) when physician order for Restorative Nursing Assistant Program (RNA, nursing interventions that promote the residents ability to adjust to living as independently and safely as possible) was not implemented. The facility failure had the potential for the residents to limit the ROM and a possible development of a contracture (shortening of muscles and joints which limit and interfere with daily functioning). FINDINGS: 1. A review of the face sheet indicated Resident 1 was admitted with diagnoses including rheumatoid arthritis (painful swelling of the joints) and muscle weakness. Minimum Data Set (MDS, a standard assessment tool) dated 10/6/23, indicated Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS, a brief…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-01-11 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — widespread
    Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to implement its plan of action to correct the identified deficiency regarding the Restorative Nursing Assistant (RNA, nursing interventions that promote the resident's ability to perform activities of daily living as independently and safely as possible) Program. The facility failure resulted in non-compliance to F688 which had the potential for the residents to limit range of motion (ROM, how far a person can move or stretch a part of the body) and a possible development of contracture (shortening of muscles and joints which limits and interfere with daily functioning). (Refer to F688) Findings: During an interview on 1/11/24, at 1:58 PM, Administrator acknowledged there were no Restorative Nurse Assistants (RNA's) from 10/2023, and the facility's failure to implement their RNA Program, was not addressed during the QAPI meetings. The Administrator stated, Obviously we didn't. No one wanted to step up. The Director of Nursing was off work and was not available for interview. A review of the facility Policy and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-01-11 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — widespread
    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to respond to a residents call for staff assistance in a timely manner when Resident 38, one of 43 sampled residents, waited half an hour to receive peri-care (hygienic care) due to soiled undergarments. This failure had the potential to cause skin injury and emotional distress to the resident. Findings: Resident 38 was admitted to facility 12/6/23 with diagnoses including diabetes, congestive heart failure, brain disease, open lower leg wound, and liver disease. The resident's Minimum Data Set, (MDS) an assessment tool, dated 12/13/23, indicated Resident 38 had a cognition score (thinking ability) of 10. (Highest score is 15). Resident 38 required an interpreter for language communication. Had impairment of both lower limbs, unable to walk, or reposition in bed or turn from side to side, and required toileting hygiene assistance. During an observation and interview on 12/19/23 at 4:40 PM, with wife present, resident stated he had to wait…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-01-11 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe and sanitary environment when shower room [ROOM NUMBER]was found uncleaned and unhygienic. The facility failure has the potential for residents to cause uncomfortable experience during bathing and use of the shower room. Findings: During an observation in shower room one on 12/21/23, at 10:56 AM, on all four shower stalls, there were black gray substance on the grout in the walls, red substance splattered on the walls, brownish clay substance smeared all over the floor, and exposed rusty sharp pices of metal on all four shower stalls. The fabric curtains of the four shower stalls has holes sorrounded by black substance and brown substance smeared the lower bottom parts of the curtains. Six large containers were inside the shower rooom 1. During an interview on 12/21/24, at 11:23 AM, Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA, caregiver) 3 stated that the shower room [ROOM NUMBER] was currently used to give showers to all residents and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-11 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to treat residents with dignity when Resident 38, one of 43 sampled residents, waited half an hour to receive peri-care (hygienic care) for soiled undergarments. This failure had the potential to cause injury and emotional distress to the resident. Findings: Resident 38 was admitted to facility 12/6/23 with diagnoses including diabetes, congestive heart failure, brain disease, open lower leg wound, and liver disease. The resident's Minimum Data Set, (MDS) an assessment tool, dated 12/13/23, indicated Resident 38 had a cognition score (thinking ability) of 10 (Highest score is 15). Had impairment of both lower limbs, unable to walk, needs repositioning in bed and turning from side to side, required toileting hygiene assistance. Required an interpreter for language communication. During an observation and interview on 12/19/23 at 4:40 PM, with wife present, resident stated he had to wait for a caregiver for half an hour today to provide peri-care. Resident stated call light response time has always been slow and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-11 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to accommodate the residents needs for tissue paper for Resident 37, one of one sampled resident, (a disposable piece of absorbent paper used as a handkerchief), who did not speak English, when tissue paper was unavailable to the resident for two days. This failure did not create an infection-controlled, individualized, respectful, and home-like environment. Findings: Resident 37 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including hemiplegia, left side, (one-sided muscle paralysis), bed confinement, stroke (loss of blood flow to brain, damaging brain tissue), diabetes, (disease of too much sugar in blood), Depressive disorder, and high blood pressure. During an interview on 12/13/23 at 11 AM, Resident 37 had been asking for facial tissues for two days and staff said there were no tissues available (over the weekend). During an interview on 12/14/23 at 2:30 PM, the Supply Supervisor stated he was available to retrieve supplies if he had been…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-11 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure the allegation of accidents, was promptly reported to the State Agency (SA, which is the California Department of Public Health, CDPH) in accordance with facility's policy and procedure for one of two sampled residents (Resident A). This failure to report fall with injury has potential for further accidents to happen not being reported. Findings: During a review on 1/11/24 at 11AM, of facility document, admission Record, dated 12/20/23, indicated, admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including: Lymphoma (cancer of the lymphatic system), Unspecified Cord Compression( Pressure in the spinal cord), Diabetes Mellitus( high sugar levels), Anemia (low blood count). Review of facility document, Nursing admission Assessment, dated 12/20/23 indicated, for mobility, full ROM (range of motion) all extremities, moderate ability to roll from side to side. Summary: indicates, resident able to perform transfers. Review of facility document, progress notes…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-11 · tag F0637 — isolated
    Assess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to identify and document changes in Resident's A condition when: weight loss started on 1/12/23, IDT (Interdisciplinary Team) meeting done on 8/14/23, The care plan had no updates on intervention since 2019. These failures had the potential for Resident 1's condition not assessed and needs not addressed, could result in Resident A not getting the care that she needs. Findings: During a review of facility document, admission Record, dated, 1/11/24, indicated, admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including: Cerebral Infarction (stroke), Dysphagia (problem with swallowing), Dementia(loss of memory), Epilepsy (Involuntary jerking movement of the body), Sepsis ( generalized Infection). Patient discharged to acute on 12/30/23. Review of Hospital H&P, dated 11/16/23, indicated, Full code, patient designated conservator as surrogate decision maker. Chief complaint: Hypoxia (lack of oxygen), female with history of Stroke, dementia who is bedbound and aphasic with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-11 · tag F0825 — isolated
    Provide or get specialized rehabilitative services as required for a resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide Occupational therapy ( OT, used to improve abilities that are needed to live life as independently as possible) services to one of one sampled resident (Resident 20) when OT services was ordered by the physician. The facility failure had the potential for further physical decline during Resident 20's stay in the facility. Findings: A review of the admission notes dated 8/31/22, indicated, Resident 20 had diagnoses including atrial fibrillation (abnormal heartbeat), diabetes (abnormally high sugar level in the blood) and diastolic heart failure (when the heart does not pump as strong as it should). The physician order dated 8/31/22, indicated Occupational therapy evaluation and treatment for Resident 20. A review of the OT evaluation notes dated 9/1/22, indicated, Resident 20 was referred to OT due to new onset of reduced Activity of Daily Living (ADL, includes eating, mobility, transfer, and walking) participation, reduce dynamic balance (ability to stay standing and stable while doing movements), decrease in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-11 · tag F0911 — isolated
    Ensure resident rooms hold no more than 4 residents; for new construction after November 28, 2016, rooms hold no more than 2 residents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to accommodate no more than four residents per room when one resident room contained a total of six residents. This failure had the potential for residents to receive less privacy, care and attention, more noise and distraction. Findings: During an observation on 12/13/24 at 11 AM, one resident in the room was the last person at the end of the room with five other residents on either side of her. She did not speak English. Her room had visitors visiting two residents. The visitors were spread out around the two residents and standing outside of the residents privacy curtains. The room appeared dark, crowded, noisy, and less private for all of the residents. One resident angrily did not want visitors of other residents to be talking and visiting with others in the room and wanted the visitors to remain behind the privacy curtains of the resident they were visiting. Review of the number of residents in the room showed more residents in the room, (6), than the acceptable (4) residents per room. During an interview…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-03 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — pattern
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based from interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure the allegation of resident to resident abuse was promptly reported to the State Agency (SA, which is the California Department of Public Health, CDPH) in accordance with the facility's policy and procedure for four of eight sampled residents Resident 1 and Resident 2, Resident 3 and Resident 4). Failure to promptly report allegation of abuse had the potential for further abuse to happen and thereby increasing the chances of harm to the residents. Findings: During a record review for Resident 1, admission Record, dated, 1/3/24, indicated, admitted to facility on 10/16/19 with diagnoses including: Convulsions (an involuntary muscle contraction causing shaking), Diabetes Mellitus (uncontrolled blood sugar), Dementia (memory loss). Resident 1 has a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) a mental test, score of 7, severe cognitive impairment. Unable to interview. During a record review for Resident 2, admission Record, dated, 1/3/24, indicated,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-03 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete elopement risk assessment for 2 residents, and provide supervision for (Resident 1 and Resident 2) when they left the building unsupervised. Resident 1 was found on the street in the next town, in shirt and slippers on 11/11/23 at around 5 PM. Resident 2 went missing on 7/20/21, at 9PM. Was found 7/21/21 in her San Francisco apartment. This failure has potential to result in harm or danger to these cognitively impaired residents. Findings: Review of admission record, dated 12/22/23, indicated, admitted with diagnoses including: Cellulitis Right lower leg (infection), type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (a disease which increases the sugar level in the blood and urine) Dementia ( problem with memory), major Depressive Disorder( a mental condition with feeling of inadequacy and guilt.) Review of MDS (Minimum Data Set), section C, Cognitive Pattern, dated 9/19/23, indicated, BIMS Score of 5. Indicates severe cognitive impairment. Interview on 12/19/23 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-24 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation interview and record review the facility failed to implement its Policy and Procedure on Abuse for one sampled resident (Resident 1) when, there was no documented evidence the Physician was notified of the allegation of financial abuse by a Family Member (FM). Failure to notify physician had the potential to negatively impact the care and services the resident needed in order to attain her highest physical mental and psychosocial well-being. Findings: Review of the admission Record dated 8/22/23 indicated, Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The diagnosis included, Osteomyelitis (inflammation or swelling that occurs in the bone), dementia (loss of thinking ability, memory, attention, logical reasoning) and atrial fibrillation (irregular heartbeats). In an interview on 8/22/23, at 9:39 AM, with the Social Worker Assistant (SWA 1), SWA 1 stated, on 6/16/23 at 10:00 am, the Deputy Officer from the Millbrae Police Department came and told the facility staff that the resident's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-24 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation interview and record review the facility failed to develop a Comprehensive Care Plan (CP, is a process that involves an ongoing regular assessments of the resident's condition to provide the appropriate interventions) to address the financial allegation of abuse for one resident (Resident 1) when a Family Member (FM) 1 changed the password on the resident's bank account. This deficient practice had the potential for the resident not to receive the care and service needed to maintain her highest practicable physical mental and psychosocial well-l being. Findings: Review of the admission Record dated 8/22/23 indicated, Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The diagnosis included Osteomyelitis (inflammation or swelling that occurs in the bone), dementia (loss of thinking ability, memory, attention, logical reasoning) and atrial fibrillation (irregular heartbeats). In an interview on 8/22/23, at 9:39 AM, with the Social Worker Assistant (SWA 1), SWA 1 stated, on 6/16/23 at 10:00 am,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-02 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure written policies and procedures on abuse were implemented when: 1.There was no documented evidence employment reference check/s was conducted to determine employment eligibility, for the Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 1 who was involved in an abuse allegation, reported by Resident 1 (R1). 2.CNA 1 was not immediately removed from duty, on 3/9/23, pending completion of the facility ' s abuse investigation. 3.Resident 1 was not monitored for 72 hours, for any psychological, behavioral, or psychosocial outcomes, after the abuse allegation incident was reported. These failures had the potential to not ensure safety, well-being, and protection of Resident 1 and other residents from abuse and/or harm. Findings: 1.During a concurrent interview and record review on 7/26/23 at 12:29 PM, with the Administrator (ADM) and Director of Nursing (DON) present, CNA 1 ' s employment records were reviewed. When asked, DON stated the facility could not find employment reference checks conducted on CNA 1. DON explained that CNA 1 was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-12-03 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide resident centered care for two of two sampled residents (Resident 43 and Resident 114) when: a. Effective interventions were not developed to prevent urinary tract infection (UTI, urine infection, bladder infection) for Resident 43; b. Intervention were not reevaluated for effectiveness to address weight loss for Resident 114. This facility failure resulted to a. Recurrent UTI for Resident 43 and; b. Weight loss for Resident 114. Findings: a. Resident 43 was admitted with diagnoses including cerebral infarction (stroke) and diabetes (abnormally high sugar level in the blood). Minimum Data Set (MDS, a standardized tool) dated 10/22/21 Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS, a brief memory test to help determine cognitive function) score of 12 indicates moderate cognitive impairment. Under functional status, resident was totally dependent, requiring extensive assistance from a staff in performance of activities of daily living such…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-12-03 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe, hazard free environment to two of two sampled residents (Resident 64 and Resident 113) when: a. a knife was found at the bedside of Resident 64; b. A movable, unsecured TV was found placed on the bedside table at the foot area of the bed for Resident 113. This facility failure has the potential for Resident 64, other residents, and staff to sustain an injury; and the Television Set (TV) to fall on to Resident 113. Findings: a. Resident 64 was admitted with diagnoses including pulmonary embolism (presence of a blood clot in the lung) and fibrosis (when the lung is damaged and scarred). Minimum Data Set (MDS, a standard assessment tool), dated 9/27/21 Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS, brief memory test to help determine cognitive function) score of 15 indicates resident is cognitively intact. During an observation on 11/29/21, at 11:14 AM, a knife was found at the bedside. During a concurrent interview, Resident 64…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2021-12-03 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — pattern
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility had 18.9% medication error rate when seven medication errors out of 37 opportunities were observed during a medication pass for Resident 61, Resident 68, and Resident 98. These deficient practice resulted in medications not given in accordance to the prescriber's order and/or manufacturer's specification which may result in residents not receiving the full therapeutic effect of the medications. Findings: 1. During a Medication Pass (Med Pass is the process through which medication is administered to the resident) observation on 11/30/21, at 9:01 a.m., after Resident 98 had her breakfast at 8:30 a.m., Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 3, prepared and administered to Resident 98 Sevelamer (Renleva) Carbonate (a medication indicated for altered kidney function) .08 gm 1 packet mixed with 30 milliliter (ml) of water. During an interview on 11/30/21, at 12:00 p.m., with LVN3, LVN3 stated, I forgot it's to be given before meals. During a review of Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-12-03 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe storage of medication for one of 24 sampled residents (Resident 64) when unprescribed medications were found at the bedside. This failure has the potential for duplication of treatment which can lead to untoward effects for Resident 64. Findings: Resident 64 was admitted with diagnoses including pulmonary embolism (presence of a blood clot in the lung) and pulmonary fibrosis (when lung tissue becomes damaged and scarred). Minimum Data Set (MDS, a standardized assessment tool) dated 9/27/21, Brief interview of Mental Status (BIMS, a brief memory test to help determine cognitive function) score of 15 indicates cognitively intact. During observation on 11/29/21, at 11:14 AM, combivent inhaler (used to prevent shortness of breath in a lung disease), fluticasone nasal spray (used to alleviate symptoms of allergies), a bottle of Vitamin B 12 (a dietary supplement), and silver sulfadiazine cream (used to prevent and treat wound infections) at the bedside. During a concurrent interview, Resident 64…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2021-12-03 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — pattern
    Provide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the competencies of sanitizing (to make clean and hygienic; to disinfect) testing process and sanitizing process were completed according to manufactures' instructions when: 1. Kitchen Aide 1 did not follow the instruction of manufacture's sanitizing testing process. She did not check Quaternary Ammonium (quat: a kind of sanitizing water) solution temperature and dipped the test strip to the quat solution for 3 seconds rather than manufacturer's recommendation of 10 seconds. 2. Maintenance Supervisor (Env) did not follow the manufacture's instruction of sanitizing process for ice machine. This failure has the potential to increase spread of infection in the facility. Findings: 1. During a concurrent observation, interview and record review on 11/30/21, at 10:53 AM, with Kitchen Aide 1, in the kitchen, sanitizing testing process was conducted. Kitchen Aide 1, proceeded to test the sanitizer strength by placing a test strip into the quat solution for no greater than 3 seconds. Kitchen Aide 1 did not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2021-12-03 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure menus were followed during lunch trayline observation. Parsley garnish was not served as menus for six of 18 residents. There was a total of 44 residents with physician ordered mechanical soft diets per tray tickets of 12/2/21. This failure had the potential to cause aspiration problem to residents who have swallowing difficulties, and to affect the residents' appetite. Findings: During an observation on 11/29/21, at 12:21 PM, in the kitchen, parsley garnish leaves instead of flakes as written on the menu were observed in the trays for six of 18 residents. Tray tickets indicated mechanical soft diets. During an interview on 12/03/21, at 1:57 PM, with Registered Dietitian (RD), RD stated, their educations were focused more to the infection control, not menu. RD stated, she will add more training for staff about menus. During a review of the facility's diet manual titled, Therapeutic diets, dated October 2017, the diet manual indicated, Therapeutic diets are prescribed . to support the resident's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-12-03 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement and maintain its infection control program when: 1. The blood pressure (BP) monitor (an equipment used to measure blood pressure) and medication tray were not disinfected between resident use. 2. The Licensed Nurse did not wear the required personal protective equipment (PPE) inside the isolation room (room [ROOM NUMBER]) during medication administration. 3. For Resident A, the Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) machine (an equipment that uses a hose connected to a mask or nosepiece to deliver constant and steady pressure to help the breathing during sleep) was placed on the floor and the nosepiece connected to a hose was left uncovered inside the bedside drawer. Failure to implement infection prevention practices may result in cross contamination of infection that may jeopardize the health and safety of the residents and staff. Findings: 1. During medication pass observation on 1/27/22, at 8:37 AM, Registered Nurse (RN)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-12-03 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services in a timely manner for one of five residents (Resident A) when the Sevelamer Hydrochloride (a phosphate binder medication used to control high blood level of phosphorous, a mineral found in food, in people with kidney disease who are on dialysis) was not available on 1/27/22. This failure resulted to Resident A not receiving the scheduled medication and had the potential for Resident A to suffer from high phosphate concentration in the blood. Findings: Review of the clinical record for Resident A indicated, was readmitted to facility on 1/14/22 with diagnoses including end-stage renal disease (ESRD, a longstanding kidney failure) and dependent on renal dialysis (the process of removing excess fluids and waste products from the blood when the kidneys stop working properly). Resident A had been receiving dialysis three times a week (Tuesday, Thursday, and Saturday) since admission. Review of the Physician Order Sheet dated 1/18/22, indicated, . 2. Start Sevelamer HCl 800 mg tab.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-12-03 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of five residents (Resident A) was free of significant medication error when, Resident A did not receive two doses of Sevelamer Hydrochloride (a phosphate binder medication used to control high blood level of phosphorous, a mineral found in food, in people with kidney disease who are on dialysis) on 1/27/22. This failure resulted to Resident A not receiving the scheduled medication and had the potential for Resident A to suffer from high phosphate concentration in the blood. Findings: Resident A was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including end-stage renal disease (ESRD, a longstanding kidney failure) and dependent on renal dialysis (the process of removing excess fluids and waste products from the blood when the kidneys stop working properly). Resident A had been receiving dialysis three times a week (Tuesday, Thursday, and Saturday) since admission. Review of the Physician Order Sheet dated 1/18/22,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-12-03 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolated
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure hot food was served that is palatable temperature and appetizing texture when test tray temperature was not in range per policy and texture was not smooth enough softer than whipped topping per standardized recipe. This deficient practice had the potential to negatively impact the residents' dining experience which may result in poor dietary intake that could potentially compromise their health and nutritional status. Definition: 1. Food palatability - refers to the taste and/or flavor of the food, acceptable to the taste. 2. Proper (safe and appetizing) temperature - both appetizing to the resident and minimizing the risk for scalding and burns. Findings: The Guidance of Appendix PP dated 11/22/17, from Centers for Medicaid/Medicare (CMS) indicated, food should be palatable, attractive, and at an appetizing temperature as determined by the type of food to ensure resident's satisfaction. Appendix PP also indicated, providing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-12-03 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store food in accordance with accepted professional standards of practice when a Japanese bread crumbs bag was not stored properly in a clean container. This failure had the potential to put residents at risk for foodborne illness. Findings: During an observation on 11/29/21, at 10:30 AM, in the Dry Storage room of the kitchen, a Japanese bread crumbs bag was observed. The Japanese bread crumbs were in the original bag with the received date of 9/16/21, and 10/26/21 as the date opened. During an interview on 12/01/21, at 11:59 AM, with Kitchen Director, Kitchen Director stated, the reason why the opened Japanese bread crumbs were still in the original bag is the vendor sent a big bulky bag instead of a small bag. During a review of the facility's document titled, Dry Goods Storage Guidelines, dated 2018, the Guideline indicated, 6 months for bread crumbs when unopened on shelf, and 6 months when opened on shelf, but there was no mention for putting in a clean container after opening. The Guidance of Appendix…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-12-03 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — isolated
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure essential equipment, including a sanitizer faucet, biofilm chemical for the floor drains, and splashguard, were maintained in a safe operating condition. This failure had the potential to cause contamination in the kitchen, which could affect overall food service operations and safety to residents and staff. Findings: 1. During a concurrent observation, interview and record review on 11/30/21, at 10:53 AM, with Kitchen Aide 1, in the kitchen, sanitizing (to make clean and hygienic; to disinfect) testing process was conducted. The quaternary ammonium solution (quat: a kind of sanitizing water) came from the faucet connected to kitchen plumbing (pipes for the water supply). Kitchen Aide 1 proceeded to test the sanitizer strength by placing a test strip into the solution for no greater than 3 seconds. Kitchen Aide 1 did not check the temperature of the sanitizing water in accordance with the manufacturer's testing instructions. It was noted testing solution should be between 65 and 75 degrees Fahrenheit (a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Bcited before2024-10-17 · tag F0911 — pattern
    Ensure resident rooms hold no more than 4 residents; for new construction after November 28, 2016, rooms hold no more than 2 residents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and facility document review, the facility failed to ensure 1 (room [ROOM NUMBER]) of 40 resident rooms was not equipped to accommodate more than four residents. room [ROOM NUMBER] was occupied by four residents but had six beds available for use when at full occupancy. Findings included: A letter from the facility to the California Department of Public Health (CDPH), dated 12/28/2023, revealed the facility requested a waiver of the room requirement for no more than four residents per room for room [ROOM NUMBER]. The letter indicated that room [ROOM NUMBER] had six beds and 86 square feet per resident. A Census, dated 10/13/2024, revealed room [ROOM NUMBER] had a six-bed capacity, but was occupied by only four residents as of 10/13/2024. A Client Accommodations Analysis, dated 10/17/2024, indicated room [ROOM NUMBER] had a floor area of 544.7 square feet with an approved capacity of six residents. During an interview on 10/17/2024 at 12:13 PM, the Director of Nursing (DON)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$7,045 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

  • $7,045 — penalty dated 2024-01-03

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
CHOY, ESTRELLAIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST10%since 07/01/2019
MAYER, RONALDIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST65%since 07/01/2019
PERETZ, ASHERIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST10%since 07/01/2019
RODRIGUEZ, ELSAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 07/01/2019

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$16.7M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+5.4%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 6%Medicare 3%Other / private 90%

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$355per resident / day
operating cost
$10,778per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$375per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in California
$12,167/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$15,178/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,000/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 056122. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-05-08, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next