No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Milpitas Care Center

120 Corning Avenue, Milpitas, CA 95035 · For profit - Corporation · 35 certified beds · (408) 262-0217 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (408) 262-0217 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citation — no harm found (F0605) — cited Jun 20251 actual-harm citation$20,051 in federal fines1 Medicare payment denial
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

In its favor
  • lower-than-typical staff turnover (19% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
Worth asking about
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has 1 actual-harm citation
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (49) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $20,051 in federal fines (most recent 2025-06-27)
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 3 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
312 S Main St #5 · (408) 668-0338 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
342 W Calaveras Blvd · (408) 263-3963 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
118 S Abel St · (408) 956-9509 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Alvarez Ct · (408) 586-3210 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
25 Corning Ave

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 3 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 2 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 3 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased13.0%10.2%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight6.9%4.0%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.8%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection4.4%1.2%2.0%worse
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms1.0%7.3%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained2.0%0.4%0.1%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury5.1%1.6%3.3%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened16.8%9.8%16.1%typical
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication2.2%13.7%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%98.2%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers0.9%4.3%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control10.3%10.2%21.2%typical for the state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table10.9%12.0%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.0%1.5%1.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission33.3%23.0%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit10.6%11.2%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days0.822.251.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days3.701.571.80worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

42.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 25 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

42.6%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
9.9%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
not reportedno hours filed
Therapy hours / resident / day

Therapy staffing: not reported. This home filed no therapist hours at all in its payroll data for this quarter. That is a gap in what it reported, and we do not read it as an absence of therapy — the homes that file nothing here include ones that discharged hundreds of Medicare rehab patients in the very same period, who plainly received therapy from someone. Because we cannot tell a home that under-reports from one that genuinely provides little, this home is left out of the comparison above rather than scored at zero. Ask it directly how many therapist hours a rehab resident gets, and on which days.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF42.6%CMS range 29.5–63.451.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF9.9%CMS range 5.8–17.410.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified28.6%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — Newly certified nursing home with less than 12-15 months of data available or the nursing home opened less than 6 months ago, and there were no data to submit or claims for this measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened4.8%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.431.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.59
RN hours/ resident / day
0.72
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.47
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.77
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.61
RN hoursweekends
19.2%
Total nursing turnover
40.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 35 beds and averages 30.6 residents a day — about 87% occupied, or roughly 4 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.77 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.59 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.47 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.52 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.88 on weekdays — 9% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.58 to 0.61 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 19% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

16
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-06-27)
11
at the previous standard inspection (2024-03-01)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

49 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 38 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · G2025-06-27 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and facility document review, the facility failed to ensure acceptable parameters of nutritional status were maintained for one of 18 sampled residents (Resident 12) when Resident 12 experienced an unplanned insidious weight loss of 10 pounds, 6.8% in three months and 16 pounds 9.8% weight loss in six months. This had the potential to result in muscle wasting, loss of independence, decreased quality of life, and increased disease complications. Findings: A professional reference review of the National Library of Medicine titled, An approach to the management of unintentional weight loss in elderly people, dated March 15, 2005, showed in part, Unintentional weight loss, or the involuntary decline in total body weight over time, is common among elderly people who live at home. Weight loss in elderly people can have a deleterious effect on the ability to function and on quality of life and is associated with an increase in mortality over a 12-month period .Unintentional weight loss…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-01-05 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop person -centered care plan that included target symptoms, measurable objectives, and interventions for five of five sampled residents (Resident 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5) when:1. No care plan for rehabilitation ((treatments and interventions aimed at improving functional abilities and quality of life) services/treatments for Resident 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5. Above failures had the potential to result in not meeting sampled residents' needs and plan of care.Findings:Review of Resident 1's face sheet (FS: a document that gives resident's information at a quick glance) indicated, Resident 1 was admitted to facility on 5/1/2014 and discharged from facility 1/7/2021.Review of Resident 1's diagnoses included muscle weakness (a reduction in strength, able to contract and perform tasks).Review of Resident 1's order summary report indicated Resident 1 had an order for PT (physical therapy, a healthcare field where movement experts help to restore, maintain, and improve physical function, mobility and quality of life) 5x/week (5 times…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-05 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow their policy and procedure (P&P) for progress notes, charting and documentation for therapy services (treatments and interventions aimed at improving functional abilities and quality of life) / treatments for five out of five sampled residents (Resident 1,2,3,4, and 5).This failure had potentially effect on plan of care, monitor functional progress, and communication for above sampled residents.Findings:Review of Resident 1's face sheet (FS: a document that gives resident's information at a quick glance) indicated, Resident 1 was admitted to facility on 5/1/2014 and discharged from facility 1/7/2021.Review of Resident 1's diagnoses included muscle weakness (a reduction in strength, able to contract and perform tasks).Review of Resident 1's order summary report indicated Resident 1 had an order for PT (physical therapy, a healthcare field where movement experts help to restore, maintain, and improve physical function, mobility and quality of life) 5x/week (5 times per week) x12 weeks (for 12 weeks), dated 11/27/2020…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-06-27 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food was stored, prepared, distributed, and served in accordance with professional standards for food safety when: 1. While feeding the two residents (Residents 25 and 3) certified nursing assistant (CNA) E touched the resident cups without conducting hand hygiene between helping the residents; 2. While assisting a resident (Resident 25) with feeding, CNA E handled the drinking surface of resident's cup; 3. The dry food storage shelves were in poor condition; and 4. Certified Nursing Assistant H (CNA H) walked out of Resident 6's room, did not sanitize her hands, and shifted residents' lunch trays in the meal cart up and down. These failures had the potential to result in bacterial or physical contamination of residents food which could lead to foodborne illness further compromising the health status of 26 residents who received meals. Findings: 4. During an observation on 6/24/25, at 11:50 a.m., certified nursing assistant H (CNA H) walked out of Resident 6's room and did not sanitize her hands. CNA H…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-06-27 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — pattern
    Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure 3 of 6 residents (5, 11, and 79) were free from unnecessary psychotropic medications (drugs that affect brain activities associated with mental processes and behaviors) when: 1. Resident 5 received Depakote (used to treat manic depressive illness) without monitoring for side effects and quarterly assessment; 2. Resident 11 received Depakote without quarterly assessment; and 3. Resident 79 received quetiapine (used to treat depressive and manic episodes), lorazepam (used to treat disorders that involve more than occasional worry or fear), haloperidol (used to treat nervous, emotional, and mental conditions), and bupropion (used to treat major depressive disorder) without monitoring for manifested behaviors. These failures resulted in unnecessary medications for the residents, which had the potential for increased risks associated with psychotropic medication use that include but not limited to sedation, respiratory depression, falls,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-27 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food that was regular and pureed potatoes were flavorful and served at a palatable temperature. These failures had the potential for residents who received potatoes to eat less and have a decreased amount of nutrient intake. Findings: During a concurrent test-tray observation and interview with the The Certified Dietary Manager (CDM) on 6/23/25 at 12:14 p.m., the temperature of a regular diced potatoes was measured with a calibrated thermometer by CDM at 100 degrees Fahrenheit (F). The CDM mentioned that there was always issues with potatoes temperature. When the potatoes were tasted, they barely felt warm in the mouth. During a concurrent test-tray observation and interview with the CDM on 6/23/25 at 12:20 p.m., when potatoes were tasted, the regular diced potatoes did not have much flavor (bland), and the pureed potato were even more bland. The CDM verified the taste and described the pureed potatoes as milky-bland; and the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-27 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to inform and provide written information to one of 5 residents (5), regarding the rights to formulate an advance directive (a legal document that explains how a resident wants medical decisions about him/her to be made if he/she cannot make the decisions himself/herself. It is used to guide the health care team and loved ones when they need to make these decisions or to decide who will make decisions for the resident when he/she can't). This failure had the potential for the facility to provide treatment and services against the residents' wishes. Findings: Review of Resident 5's admission Record indicated she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident 5's clinical record indicated she did not have an advance directive and did not have an Advanced Directive Acknowledgement that an advance directive was addressed or if the resident/resident representative was helped in formulating an advance directive. During an interview with registered…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-27 · tag F0582 — isolated
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide that one of 3 residents (Resident 132) reviewed for the SNF Beneficiary Protection Notification Review received a written copy of the Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC) at least two calendar days before the end of Medicare Part A coverage. This failure denied Resident 132 the knowledge to appeal the discharge. Findings: Record review of Resident 132's NOMNC indicated that it was issued to Resident 132's representative on 5/3/25, the date of Resident 132's discharge. Resident 132's last Medicare Part A covered day was also 5/2/25. The NOMNC was issued one day late. During an interview on 6/26/25 at 11:27 a.m., the Social Services Director (SSD) stated that the NOMNC should have been issued at least 72 hours before the last covered day, to allow the resident or representative time to appeal. The SSD acknowledged that the notification was not issued timely and that she did not inform Resident 132 or the representative about the last Medicare covered day prior to discharge. Review of an undated facility's policy…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-27 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. Review of Resident 10's admission Record indicated she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with schizophrenia diagnosis. Review of Resident 10's PASARR Level I Screening, dated 11/22/22, indicated that Resident 10 did not have a serious diagnosed mental disorder such as schizophrenia. During an interview with registered nurse A (RN A) on 6/25/25, at 3:53 p.m., she reviewed Resident 10's 11/22/22 PASARR Level I Screening and confirmed that Resident 10's PASARR Level I Screening should have indicated she had a serious diagnosed mental disorder such as schizophrenia. Review of facility's policy and procedure (P&P) entitled admission Criteria dated 2001, the P&P indicated, .9. All new admissions and readmissions are screened for mental disorders (MD), intellectual disabilities (ID) or related disorders (RD) per the Medicaid Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) process b. If the level I screen indicates that the individual may meet the criteria for a MD, ID, or RD, he or she is referred to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-27 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide services that meet professional standards of quality for two of 14 sampled residents (Residents 4 and Resident 1) when: 1. For Resident 4, the facility staff did not document the apical pulse (the pulse that is felt at the bottom of the heart) before administering Digoxin (a medication used to treat certain heart conditions); and 2. Resident 1 was given the medication Carvedilol (used to treat high blood pressure) when her diastolic blood pressure (the bottom number in a blood pressure reading, representing the pressure in your arteries when your heart is at rest between beats) was low (a diastolic pressure reading below 60 is considered low) at 50 mmhg (millimeters of mercury, a unit of measurement). These failures had the potential to compromise the residents' care and could cause health complications. Findings: Review of Resident 4's admission record indicated that the resident had a diagnosis of unspecified atrial fibrillation (an irregular and often rapid heart rhythm that can lead to poor blood…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-27 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the residents received the necessary care and services for one of 14 residents (15) when Resident 15 did not receive weekly weight and one-to-one feeding assistance with all meals as ordered by the physician. This failure had the potential to negatively affect the resident's nutritional status, health, and well-being. Findings: Review of Resident 15's admission Record indicated she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident 15's Nutritional Assessment, dated 2/12/24, indicated she had insidious weight loss since 10/2023, and Resident 15 may benefit from one-to-one feeding assistance with all meals to promote intake and gradual weight gain. Review of Resident 15's physician orders indicated she had orders for one-to-one feeding assistance with all meals, started on 2/13/24, and weekly weight in the morning every Tuesday, started on 5/21/24. Review of Resident 15's weight document, from 5/17/24 to 6/2/25, indicated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 38 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-27 · tag F0730 — isolated
    Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to conduct performance review at least once every 12 months for one of 4 certified nursing assistants (CNA F) and one of two licensed vocational nurses (LVN G). This failure resulted in unidentified training needed for the CNA and the LVN to improve their skills in resident care every year. Findings: Review of CNA F's personal file indicated she was hired on 9/26/22, and she did not have a performance review done in 2023. Review of LVN G's personal file indicated she was hired on 8/18/22, and she did not have any performance review done. During an interview with the director of staff development (DSD) on 6/26/25, at 3:05 p.m., she reviewed CNA F's and LVN G's personal files and confirmed that CNA F did not have a performance review done in 2023, and LVN G did not have any performance review done since 8/18/22 when she was hired. The DSD acknowledged that staff performance review should be done every year. Review of the facility's policy, Performance Evaluations, dated 9/2020, indicated The job performance of each employee…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-27 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure an accurate record of medication disposition when number of counted Lorazepam (medication that helps calm the brain and nervous system) tablets for destruction was not correctly documented. This failure had the potential for misuse or diversion of controlled medications. Findings: During a concurrent observation, interview, and record review on 6/24/25 at 10:20 a.m. with the Interim Director of Nursing (IDON), and the Administrator (ADM), a random audit of medications for destruction was done. The IDON verified a bottle of lorazepam 0.5 mg (milligram, a unit of measurement) tablets for destruction contained 24.5 tablets. The IDON and ADM verified the record sheet indicated 14.5 tablets were to be destructed. The IDON stated it should have been recorded as 24 tablets. The IDON also stated she counted the medications with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) B prior to documentation. During a concurrent observation, interview, and record review on 6/24/25 at 10:28 a.m. with LVN B, LVN B verified there were…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-27 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure two of 6 residents (25 and 79) were free from unnecessary medications when Resident 25 and Resident 79 received apixaban (a blood thinner to prevent blood clots) but were not monitored for the side effects and not care-planned on the use of the medication. This failure had the potential for the residents to experience unrecognized adverse effects. Findings: 1. Review of Resident 25's admission Record indicated she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident 25's physician order, dated 6/4/25, indicated she had an order for apixaban 2.5 milligrams (mg, a metric unit of mass) two times a day. However, review of Resident 25's clinical record did not indicate that Resident 25 was monitored for the side effects and care-planned on the use of the medication. During an interview with the interim director of nursing (IDON) on 6/27/25, at 2:44 p.m., she reviewed Resident 25's clinical record and confirmed that Resident 25 was not monitored…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-27 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility had a medication error rate of 8% when two medication errors occurred out of 25 opportunities during medication administration for 1 out of seven residents (Residents 129) when Resident 129's medications, Metformin (medication primarily used to a condition where the body doesn't use insulin properly to control blood sugar levels) and Insulin Lispro (a rapid-acting form of insulin used for the treatment of high blood sugar) were not given according to the Physician's Orders. The deficient practice resulted in medications not given in accordance with the prescriber's orders and/or manufacturer's specifications, which may result in residents not receiving the full therapeutic effect of the medications. Findings: During a medication pass observation on 6/24/25 at 4:25 p.m. with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) C, LVN C administered the medications Metformin 1000 mg (milligram, a unit of measurement) tablet orally and insulin lispro 4 units injected subcutaneously (into the tissue layer between the skin and the muscle) to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-27 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure proper medication storage and labeling of medications when an opened lorazepam oral concentrate (medication that helps calm the brain and nervous system) was found inside the refrigerator without an open-date label. The deficient practice had a potential for residents to receive medications with unsafe and reduced potency which could lead to unsafe and ineffective medications for the residents. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 6/23/25 at 9:01 a.m. with the Interim Director of Nursing (IDON) in the Medication Room, the IDON verified an opened box of used lorazepam oral concentrate inside the refrigerator. The IDON also verified there was no label for its open-date. The IDON stated it should have been labeled when it was opened. A review of facility's policy and procedure (P&P) entitled Medication Labeling and Storage dated 2001, the P&P indicated, .6. Medications requiring refrigeration are stored in a refrigerator located in the medication room at the nurses' station or other…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-27 · tag F0887 — isolated
    Educate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to obtain consent (permission or agreement from someone having authority or power) for Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19, a mild to severe respiratory illness that is airborne and is spread from person to person or by contact with infectious material such as respiratory droplets in the air and to a lesser degree on high touch surfaces in the environment) vaccination for one of 5 residents (4). This failure had the potential to result in Resident 4's responsible party (RP, the party responsible to making health care decisions when the principal party is unable to make) not being aware of the risks and benefits of COVID-19 vaccine, and therefore unable to make an informed healthcare decision regarding the vaccine. Findings: Review of Resident 4's admission Record indicated he was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and he had one of his sons as his RP. Review of Resident 4's COVID-19 Immunization Record indicated on 10/30/24, Resident 4's family refused for him…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-09 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow it's Policy and Procedure titled Isolation-Initiating Transmission- Based Precautions, when the facility failed to implement the transmission-based precautions for isolation precaution (process of creating barriers between people and germs to help prevent the spread of infectious microbes) when residents develop signs and symptoms of productive cough and suspected of respiratory illness during the outbreak for five of five sampled residents (Resident 1, Resident 2, Resident 3, Resident 4, and Resident 5). This failure had the potential to spread infectious disease to other residents and staff at the facility. Findings: During an interview on 12/10/24 at 10:08 a.m., with the Infection Prevention Nurse (IP), the IP stated in March 2024 about eight to nine residents with symptoms of runny nose and cough were reported. The IP stated they notified the doctor to get an order for cough and an order for isolation precaution related to respiratory illness outbreak then placed residents on isolation. During a review of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-21 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide supervision to prevent one of two residents (Resident 1) who were at risk for elopement from leaving the facility without staffs' knowledge and permission when Resident 1's wander guard (device used to keep track of residents), was not checked for functionality and staff did not provide Resident 1 with supervision or assistance. These failures compromised Resident 1's safety, as she was found outside of the facility. Findings: Review of Resident 1's admission record indicated, Resident 1 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including unspecified dementia (loss of memory), unspecified severity, with other behavioral disturbance, essential primary hypertension (occurs when the abnormally high blood pressure was not a result of a medical condition), mixed hyperlipidemia (high levels of fat particles in the blood), and history of falling. Review of Resident 1's interdisciplinary team (IDT, brings together knowledge from different…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-03-01 · tag F0700 — pattern
    Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to review the risks and benefits of bed rails (adjustable metal or rigid plastic bars that attach to the bed) with the resident, or resident representative, document the use of alternatives prior to installation of bed rails for three of 23 residents (Resident 23, Resident 25, and Resident 131), and obtain informed consent prior to the use of bed rails for three of 23 residents (Resident 4, Resident 6, and Resident 18). These failures had the potential to put the residents at risk for entrapment and serious injury due to not being aware of the risks and benefits of bed rails. Findings: During an observation on 02/26/24, at 09:05 a.m., Residents 4, 6, 18, 23, 25, and 131 had side rails up and installed on their beds. During an interview on 2/27/24, at 1:45 p.m., with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) C, CNA C stated, Residents 4, 6, 18, 23, 25, and 131 have side rails up on their beds. During a record review of Residents 4, 6, and 18's Medical Records (undated), it was indicated there was no signed informed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-01 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure safe and sanitary food service operations were carried out according to standards of practice when: 1. A wet rice cooker pot was stored in the rice cooker without being air dried; and 2. The dry storage room bottom shelf was under six inches (a unit of length) off the floor. These failures had the potential to expose 27of 28 residents to harmful contaminants that could cause foodborne illness. Findings: 1. During a concurrent observation and interview on 2/26/24 at 8:42 a.m. with the Certified Dietary Manager (CDM) in the kitchen, there was a wet rice cooker pot stored inside of the rice cooker. The CDM took out the pot and stated they would wash the pot again, and it should have been air dried before storing in the rice cooker. During a review of the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled Dishwashing undated. The P&P indicated, 5. Dishes are to be air dried in racks before stacking and storing. 2. During a concurrent observation and interview on 2/27/24 at 10:20 a.m. with the CDM in the dry…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-03-01 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — pattern
    Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to properly dispose the garbage and did not follow the facility's policy and procedures (P&P) for Covering receptacles when one of two dumpsters did not have lids closed properly. This failure had the potential to attract pests and rodents which could lead to unsanitary conditions and spread of disease. Findings: During an observation on 2/26/24 at 12:20 p.m. at the facility's outside dumpsters area, there was one dumpster with the lid left open. During an observation on 2/27/24 at 11:15 a.m., the same dumpster had overflowing garbage, and the lid was not closed tightly. During an interview on 2/28/24 at 3:33 p.m. with the Maintenance Supervisor (MS), the MS stated dumpsters should have been closed to prevent rodents and pests, and dumpsters were emptied every Monday, Wednesday, and Friday. During a review of the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled Miscellaneous Areas undated. The P&P indicated, Trash procedure: 2. Garbage and trashcans must be inspected daily that no debris is on the ground or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-03-01 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — pattern
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure pneumococcal vaccine (vaccine to prevent bacterial pneumonia [infection of the lungs]) up to date for 10 of 15 sampled residents (Resident 3, 4, 9, 11, 12, 13, 16, 17, 19, and 27) per the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)'s pneumococcal vaccine schedule guidelines. This failure had the potential to place residents at a high risk of acquiring and transmitting pneumonia in the facility. Findings: Review of Resident 3, 4, 9, 11, 12, 13, 16, 17, 19, and 27 medical records, indicated all 10 residents were over [AGE] years old and their admission dates and pneumococcal vaccination statuses as follows: - Resident 3 was admitted on [DATE], the resident received Prevnar 13 (PCV13, a type of pneumococcal vaccine) on 6/17/15. - Resident 4 was admitted on [DATE], the resident received Pneumovax 23 (PPV23, a type of pneumococcal vaccine) on 5/27/11. - Resident 9 was admitted on [DATE], the resident received PCV13 on 3/3/22. - Resident 11 was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-01 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure respect and dignity for two of 12 sampled residents (Resident 17 & Resident 19) during mealtime. These failures had the potential to negatively affect Resident 17 & Resident 19's emotional health. Findings: During an observation on 2/26/24, at 12:00 p.m., Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) D assisted Resident 17 while eating lunch. CNA E was standing over Resident 17, who was sitting in bed in an upright position. During an observation on 2/26/24, at 12:00 p.m., CNA C assisted Resident 19 while eating lunch. CNA C was standing over Resident 19 and Resident 19 who was sitting on bed in an upright position. During an interview on 2/26/24, at 12:11 p.m., with CNA D, CNA D stated, she assisted Resident 17 while eating lunch. CNA D stated she was standing and she was supposed to sit down while assisting Resident 17. During an interview on 2/26/24, at 12:15 p.m., with CNA C, CNA C stated she assisted Resident 19 while eating lunch and she was standing over him. CNA C stated she was supposed to sit down while…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-01 · tag F0582 — isolated
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide the Skilled Nursing Facility Advance Beneficiary Notice (SNF ABN, a financial liability notice) for one of three sampled residents (Resident 27). This failure could lead the resident unknowingly assume financial liability for receiving services that were not covered by Medicare (federal health insurance for anyone age [AGE] and older, and some people under 65 with certain disabilities) . Findings: During a review of Resident 27's face sheet (a document that contains a summary of a resident's personal and demographic information), it was indicated Resident 27 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and her stay was paid by Medicare until 9/29/23. Resident 27 was currently resided at the facility. During a concurrent interview and record review on 2/28/24 at 11:51 a.m. with the Social Services (SS), Resident 27's Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC, a notice that indicates when a resident's stay at a SNF is no longer covered by Medicare) was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-01 · tag F0730 — isolated
    Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed complete annual performance reviews for 2 of 4 sampled staff (Certified Nursing Assistant [CNA] E and CNA C). These failures had the potential to negatively affect patient care. Findings: During a review of CNA E's employee record (undated), the employee record indicated, CNA E was hired on 11/8/22. During a review of CNA C's employee record (undated), the employee record indicated, CNA C was hired on 2/6/23. During a concurrent interview and record review on 2/28/24, at 1:48 p.m., with Director of Staff Development (DSD), CNA E's employee record was reviewed. The employee record indicated, no performance reviews since start date. DSD stated, CNA E had no performance review since she started working in 2022. CNAs are supposed to have a performance review annually. During a concurrent interview and record review on 2/28/24, at 1:50 p.m., with DSD, CNA C's employee record was reviewed. The employee record indicated, no performance reviews since start date. DSD stated, CNA C had no performance review for February 2024. During a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-01 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to store temperature sensitive medications appropriately. This failure had the potential for residents to receive medications with limited effectiveness. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 2/26/24, at 11:47 a.m., with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) F, in Medication Storage Room, the medication refrigerator's internal temperature read 52 degrees Fahrenheit. The internal temperature probe had a Safe Range of 10 degrees Fahrenheit to 40 degrees Fahrenheit. Two medications were noted on first shelf to be Basaglar Kwikpen 10 unit/1mL Insulin Pen [medication used to control blood sugar] both medications were unopened, packaging on medication read, Refrigerate until opened. LVN F stated, the internal temperature of the medication refrigerator is higher than 50 degrees Fahrenheit, it is too warm, we store our unopened insulin in there. During a concurrent observation and interview on 2/27/24, at 2:03p.m., with LVN F, in Medication Storage Room, a new medication refrigerator was placed in spot…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-01 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to document repositioning for one out of 12 sampled residents (Resident 3) while in bed. This failure had the potential to result in inaccurate provision of care. Findings: During an observation on 02/29/24 at 9:32 a.m., Resident 3 was in bed lying on his back. During an interview on 2/29/24 at 9:42 a.m. with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) A, CNA A stated, Resident 3 was turned every hour. CNA A stated there was no evidence documentation when turning was completed. CNA A stated, there should have been a documentation for the turning. During an observation on 02/29/24 at 11:13 a.m., Resident 3 was lying in bed and was facing the right side. During a concurrent interview and record review on 2/29/24 at 11:14 a.m. with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) B, Treatment Administration Record (TAR) dated 2/1/24- 2/29/24 was reviewed. The TAR indicated, Turn and reposition q1h (every one hour) every shift. Start date 2/16/24 1500 (3:00 p.m.). The TAR indicated check marks with initials three times daily for the rows…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-01 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to implement proper infection control measures when: 1. The Infection Preventionist (IP) did not put on a pair of disposable gloves prior to handling a urine bag. 2. Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) G did not perform hand hygiene during medication administration. These failures had the potential to result in spread of infection and compromise the health and safety of the residents in the facility. Findings: 1. During a concurrent observation and interview on 2/28/24 at 10:48 a.m., with Infection Preventionist (IP), in Resident 3's room, IP handled Resident 3's urine bag and tubing with bare hands. Resident 3's urine bag and tubing both visibly contained urine. Upon leaving Resident 3's room, IP touched and pressed the top of the hand sanitizer by the door to dispense product. IP stated, I should have worn gloves prior to touching the urine bag. 2. During a concurrent observation and interview on 2/28/24, at 3:36 p.m., with LVN G, in hallway by Resident 19's room, LVN G began preparing Resident 19's medication…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-01 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — isolated
    Ensure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure nurse aides (Certified Nursing Assistants: CNAs) received 12 hours of annual in-service which included dementia management and abuse prevention training for a census of 28 when documentation of the nurse aide in-services could not be provided for 2 of 4 sampled staff. This failure had the potential to affect the quality of care and services provided to the residents. Findings: During a review of CNA E's employee record (undated), the employee record indicated, CNA E was hired on 11/8/22. During a review of CNA C's employee record (undated), the employee record indicated, CNA C was hired on 2/6/23. During a concurrent interview and record review on 2/28/24, at 1:48 p.m., with Director of Staff Development (DSD), CNA E's employee record was reviewed. The employee record indicated, no competencies or in-services since start date. DSD stated, CNA E has not had any competencies or in-services since she started working in 2022. They should have competencies and in-services annually and as needed. During a concurrent…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-05 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to exercise the resident's right as a resident of the facility for one out of three resident (Resident 1) when Resident 1 was not allowed to leave out on pass to get her Covid-19 (Covid-19: a sickness caused by virus called severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2) booster vaccine (lessens the severity of Covid-19 by teaching the person's immune system to recognize and fight the virus that causes the disease) outside the facility. This failure had the potential to effect on health and well-being to Resident 1 Findings: During record review of Resident 1's face sheet (a document that gives a resident's information at a quick glance) indicated, Resident 1 admitted to facility on 11/8/2021 and discharged home on 1/3/2022. Resident 1's admission diagnoses including compression fracture of T11-T12 vertebra (broken bones of the spine[Spine: column of bones running from head down to the lower back]), osteoporosis (a bone disease that develops when bone mineral density and bone mass decreases, or when quality or structure of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-09-05 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — pattern
    Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a Registered Nurse (RN) was on duty for 8 consecutive hours, for seven days (7/15/23, 7/16/23, 7/22/23, 7/30/23, 8/13/23, 8/19/23, and 8/20/23) out of 62 sampled days. This failure had the potential to negatively affect all 27 residents at the facility. Findings: During an interview on 9/5/23 at 10:15 a.m. with Director of Nursing (DON), DON stated she works Monday through Friday for 8 hours each day, and the facility schedules an RN for Saturday and Sunday. DON stated, she serves as the RN on duty for Monday through Friday as the census is always below 60 residents at the facility. During a review of [Facility] Licensed Nurse Schedule, dated July 2023, the Schedule indicated, no RN was scheduled on 7/15/23, 7/16/23, 7/22/23, or 7/30/23. During a review of [Facility] Licensed Nurse Schedule, dated August 2023, the Schedule indicated, no RN was scheduled on 8/13/23, 8/19/23, or 8/20/23. During an interview on 9/5/23 at 11:30 a.m. with DON, DON stated no RN was on duty at the facility on 8/13/23, 8/19/23, or 8/20/23.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-07-22 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food was stored, prepared, distributed and served in accordance with professional standards for food safety when: 1. Time Temperature Control for Safety Foods (TCS=food requires time/temperature control for safety to limit the growth of pathogens (i.e., bacterial or viral organisms capable of causing a disease or toxin formation) were above 41°F (°F, a temperature scale) in the Residents' refrigerator, and refrigerator and freezer temperatures were not monitored, 2. Residents' food items were not monitored for expiration dates, 3. Staff did not perform proper hand hygiene while dishwashing, 4. A can opener was not kept in sanitary condition, 5. Freezer gaskets had blackish substance in the crevices, 6. Supply closet had staff's personal belongings with the cleaning equipment, and food equipment; and 7. Food preparation sink had no air gap. These failures had the potential to cause cross contamination of food (cross contamination occurs when unclean surfaces or utensils spread germs to food and can…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-07-22 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — pattern
    Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide care and services for effective communication when the facility did not provide language assistance or other communication aid for four of five sampled residents (Residents 6, 24, 127 and 128) with language barrier (speaking in foreign language). This failure had the potential to affect the psychosocial well-being of the resident and a decline in the activities of daily living. Findings: 1) A review of Resident 6's Quarterly, minimum data set (MDS, an assessment tool), dated 4/26/2022, indicated Resident 6 needed an interpreter because the Preferred Language was a foreign language. During an observation on 7/18/2022 at 12:21 p.m., Resident 6 was observed sitting on a chair eating lunch. Resident 6 was observed trying to communicate speaking her language. There was no communication aid observed near the bed or on the overbed table. During a concurrent observation and interview with certified nurse assistant E (CNA E) on 7/19/2022 at 8:54 a.m., the CNA E confirmed there was no communication aid for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-07-22 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure three of 12 sampled residents (Resident 11, 2, and 128) received the appropriate care and services when: 1. For Resident 11, licensed vocational nurse A (LVN A) did not administer Metformin (a drug that helps to control the amount of glucose (sugar) in your blood) as ordered; 2. For Resident 2, facility staff did not follow physician's order of administering resident's tube feeding (giving medicines and liquids through a small tube placed through the nose or mouth into the stomach or small intestine) and did not monitor signs and symptoms while on anticoagulant (medicines that help prevent blood clots) medication; and 3. For Resident 128, facility staff did not properly monitor resident's intravenous (IV, into or within a vein) therapy. These failures have the potential to affect resident's health and medical condition. Findings: 1. Review of Resident 11's clinical record indicated, resident had diagnoses including Type 2 diabetes mellitus (characterized by high levels of sugar in the blood), chronic…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-07-22 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review , the facility staff failed to ensure drugs and biologicals were safely stored and discarded per facility's policy and manufacturer's recommendations when; 1. a multi-dose vial of Tuberculin solution (injected under the skin to aid diagnosis of tuberculosis (infectious disease that usually affects the lungs) had no opened date; 2. one eyedrop and one insulin (medication to treat high blood sugar) vial for Resident 24 and an insulin pen for Resident 11 was being used past the discard date; and controlled medications (controlled by the government because it may be abused or cause addiction) for 5 discharged residents were not removed from the medication cart in a timely manner. These failures had the potential for residents to receive medications with reduced potency and unsafe access to controlled medications in the facility. Findings: 1. During a concurrent observation and interview with licensed vocational nurse B (LVN B) on 7/18/2022, at 9:42 a.m., while in the medication storage room, there was one opened multi-dose vial…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-07-22 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and facility document review, the facility failed to ensure the planned menu was followed when 1. Three of three residents (Residents 126, 20, and 76) on renal diets, (diets that are designed for people with kidney function that slowly gets worse with time) were served potatoes and chocolate mousse. 2. Four of four residents (Residents 128,13, 3, and 12) on puree diets (texture modified diets for people with chewing or swallowing difficulties) when they were served pureed foods different from regular foods. 3. Ketchup was not served according to the menu. These failures had the potential to result in not meeting the nutritional needs thus further compromising the nutritional status of these residents. Findings: 1. Review of the facility menu titled Cooks Spreadsheet for week 3 Monday Lunch (7/18/22) indicated French fries and Chocolate Mousse for all types of diet except Renal which was to get Pineapple Ring and Sugar Cookies. During an observation of the lunch meal service on 7/18/22 at 11:27 a.m., French fries and chocolate mousse were on Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-07-22 · tag F0552 — isolated
    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Escitalopram Oxalate (a psychotropic medication used to treat depression and certain anxiety disorders) was administered with consent of Resident 25. This failure had the potential of not honoring resident's rights to be informed about his treatment. Review of the clinical record indicated Resident 25 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis of multiple sclerosis (chronic disease affecting the central nervous system, depression (a mental health problem that involves a low mood and a loss of interest in activities). Review of Resident 25's Order Summary Report, indicated the physician order dated on 6/13/2022 to give Escitalopram Oxalate 20 milligrams (mg, unit of measurement) one tablet by mouth once a day for major depression. During a concurrent interview and record review with Registered Nurse I (RN I) on 7/20/2022 at 4:00 p.m., RN I confirmed that there was no record of informed consent for Escitalopram Oxalate 20mg for Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-07-22 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility staff failed to provide to one of 12 sampled residents (Resident 25) his preferred foreign television channel. This failure had the potential to affect the physical and mental well-being of Resident 25. Findings: Review of Resident 25's clinical record indicated, resident had diagnoses including Multiple Sclerosis (disabling disease of the brain and spinal cord), sepsis (life-threatening condition that occurs when the body's response to an infection damages its own tissues), hydroneprosis with uteropelvic junction obstruction (condition where blockage occurs at the junction where the ureter attaches to the kidney), depression (a mental health problem that involves a low mood and a loss of interest in activities). Review of Resident 25's Care Plan, dated 6/16/2022, indicated the resident was dependent on staff for meeting emotional, intellectual, physical, social needs related to cognitive deficits, disease process, immobility, and physical limitations. Resident 25's care plan prefers to watch television with a foreign…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-07-22 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide nephrostomy tube (a catheter that's inserted through your skin and into your kidney. The tube helps to drain urine from your body) care to one of 12 sampled residents (Resident 25). This failure had the potential to affect the health and well-being of Resident 25. Findings: Review of Resident 25's clinical record indicated, resident had diagnoses including Multiple Sclerosis (disabling disease of the brain and spinal cord), sepsis (life-threatening condition that occurs when the body's response to an infection damages its own tissues), urinary tract infection (UTI, bladder infection), hydroneprosis with uteropelvic junction obstruction (condition where blockage occurs at the junction where the ureter attaches to the kidney). During a concurrent observation and interview on 7/18/2022 at 9:10 a.m., while inside Resident 25's room. Resident was lying in bed, awake and alert. Observed a catheter bag (urine drainage bag) positioned at the left side of the bed. Review of Resident 25's Plan of Care,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-07-22 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolated
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interview, and record reviews, the facility failed to provide foods at an appetizing temperature for three of 24 residents (Resident 21, 11, 15) receiving food from the kitchen. This failure had the potential to result in decreased intake thus further compromising the nutritional status of these residents. Findings: During an interview on 7/18/22 at 9:31 am, Resident 21 stated the food was sometimes not warm and it was cold. Further interview at lunch meal service on 7/19/22 at 11:55 am, Resident 21 stated the food was never hot. During an interview on 7/18/22 at 10:30 am, Resident 15 stated the food was cold and that he mentioned it to the staff and the food was cold. Further interview at the lunch meal service on 7/19/22 at 11:40 am, Resident 15 stated the food was cold again. During an interview on 7/19/22 at 9:45 AM, Resident 11 stated the food was cold. Review of facility menu titled Summer Menus Week 3 Wednesday indicated for lunch on 7/20/22 Taco Casserole, Seasoned Fresh Zucchini, Fiesta Salad, and Tangy Glazed Fresh Fruit. As a result of the resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-07-22 · tag F0808 — failed to follow doctor-ordered diets — isolated
    Ensure therapeutic diets are prescribed by the attending physician and may be delegated to a registered or licensed dietitian, to the extent allowed by State law.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and facility document review, the facility failed to provide a therapeutic diet as prescribed by a physician for one resident (Resident 17) out of 24 residents when Resident 17 received regular texture meat instead of Mechanical soft (a modified diet that restricts foods that are difficult to chew or swallow). This failure had the potential to result in the resident not being able to chew the food possibly leading to choking. Findings: Review of the facility's Cooking Spreadsheet Week 3 Lunch 7/18/22 under Mechanical soft indicated French Dip Roast beef Grd (ground) #10 (3/8 cup) moisten with broth. During a concurrent observation and interview of the lunch meal service with Food Service Worker D (FSW D) on 7/18/22 at 11:38 a.m., Resident 17's tray had French dip Roast beef with regular sliced roast beef on a soft sandwich roll, French fries, corn coleslaw, Cappuccino mousse and milk ready for distribution. A review of Resident 17's tray ticket indicated Mechanical soft, NCS (No concentrated Sweets), NAS (No Added Salt), low fat, low cholesterol diet.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-07-22 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and facility's document review, the facility failed to implement infection control measures when: 1. The certified nurse assistant H (CNA H) did not perform hand hygiene after touching dirty carts and placed a clean bag of towels and gowns on top of Resident 126's four wheeled walker; 2. The Infection Preventionist (IP) did not perform hand hygiene prior to donning (putting on) a pair of gloves to flush a peripheral intravenous catheter (a thin, flexible tube inserted into a vein); 3. The licensed vocational nurse A (LVN A) did not perform hand hygiene in between tasks during Resident 126's wound care; and 4. The licensed vocational nurse A (LVN A) did not perform hand hygiene in between tasks and pulled out a handful of gloves for use during Resident 24's wound care. These failures had the potential to result in the spread of infection and compromise the health and safety of the residents in the facility. Findings: 1. During an observation on 7/18/2022 at 9:43 a.m., the certified nurse assistant H (CNA H) was observed coming out from room AA (RM AA),…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-07-22 · tag F0888 — isolated
    Ensure staff are vaccinated for COVID-19
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement its policy and procedure to ensure all staff were fully vaccinated for COVID-19 (a new infectious viral disease that can cause respiratory illness) when there were no evidence of proof of vaccination or medical waiver for one of 43 staff (BOM-business office manager). As a result, the facility's COVID-19 staff vaccination rate was 97.67% on 7/22/2022. This failure had the potential to spread COVID-19 infection to staff, residents, and visitors. Findings: During an interview with the facility's infection preventionist (IP) on 7/22/2022 at 9:31 a.m., the IP stated the BOM declined to have the COVID-19 vaccine. The IP confirmed the BOM did not have any medical waiver. During an interview with the BOM on 7/22/2022 at 9:58 a.m., the BOM confirmed the declination of the COVID-19 vaccine due to having vascular problems. The BOM stated her personal physician did not sign the medical waiver because the physician required the BOM to get vaccinated. The BOM further stated, I am looking for a doctor to sign my medical…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-07-22 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolated
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe and functional environment for staff when a kitchen cabinet door was broken at the hinge. This failure could result an injury to the staff when working in the kitchen. Findings: During the initial tour of the kitchen on 07/18/22 starting at 8:49 a.m., the cabinet door below the food preparation sink was broken at the hinge and was difficult to open and close. During a concurrent interview with the Food Service Worker D (FSW D) she stated the broken door was reported to maintenance. During an interview on 07/19/22 at 8:26 a.m., Maintenance Supervisor (MS) stated there were no issues in the kitchen reported to him yesterday. He further stated the maintenance issues was reported to him verbally. There was no maintence log to track regarding the issues and repairs if he was able to fix the problem. During an observation and concurrent interview on 7/19/22 at 8:53 a.m. in the kitchen while looking at the broken cabinet door, MS confirmed it was broken and needs fixing for safety reasons. During an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-07-22 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — isolated
    Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the environment was free of pests as evidenced by flying insects seen in the kitchen, and conference room. This failure had the potential to cause a health hazard to the residents and staff. Findings: During an observation on 7/18/22 at 2:57 p.m., a black insect was flying inside the conference room. During a follow up observation and interview with Maintenance Supervisor (MS) on 7/20/22 at 9:43 a.m., a black insect was flying inside the kitchen during the food preparation. MS confirmed the observation and stated an insect should have never been inside the kitchen and the insect would land on the food. During an interview with Registered Dietitian (RD) on 7/20/22 at 10:09 a.m., RD stated insects in the kitchen may cause potential contamination of food. During a review of the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Pest Control, dated 2007, the P&P indicated Pest Control is important in preventing the spread of disease.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Bcited before2025-06-27 · tag F0912 — pattern
    Provide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the following multi-resident rooms provided less than 80 square feet per resident: Findings: Room Total Sq. Ft. Sq. Ft./Bed No. of Beds 6 287.86 71.965 4 7 287.86 71.965 4 10 286.66 71.665 4 During observations throughout the survey, none of the rooms were observed to inhibit the staff from providing care or the residents from receiving adequate care. The staff and the residents moved freely in the rooms. The residents and staff verbalized no complaints or concerns regarding space and privacy. Continuance of the room waiver is recommended.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Bcited before2024-03-01 · tag F0912 — pattern
    Provide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the following multi-resident rooms provided less than 80 square feet per resident: Findings: Room Total Sq. Ft. Sq. Ft./Bed No. of Beds 6 287.86 71.965 4 7 287.86 71.965 4 10 286.66 71.665 4 During observations throughout the survey, none of the rooms were observed to inhibit the staff from providing care or the residents from receiving adequate care. The staff and the residents moved freely in the rooms. The residents and staff verbalized no complaints or concerns regarding space and privacy. Continuance of the room waiver is recommended.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Waiver has been granted
  • No harm found · Bcited before2022-07-22 · tag F0912 — pattern
    Provide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the following multi-resident rooms provided less than 80 square feet per resident. Findings: Room Total Sq. Ft. Sq. Ft/Bed No. of Beds 6 287.86 71.965 4 7 287.86 71.965 4 10 286.66 71.665 4 During an interview with certified nurse assistant J (CNA J) on 7/20/2022 at 10:00 a.m., the CNA J stated there was no problem in performing activities of daily living (ADL - bed mobility, transfer, walking, toileting, eating) with residents in rooms [ROOM NUMBER]. The CNA J confirmed each rooms had 4 beds. During an interview with CNA E on 7/20/2022 at 10:05 a.m., the CNA E stated there was no concern about the space in rooms [ROOM NUMBER]. The CNA E further stated she could still provide care with the residents in rooms [ROOM NUMBER]. During observations throughout the survey, none of the rooms were observed to inhibit the staff from providing care or the residents from receiving adequate care. The staff and the residents moved freely in the rooms. The residents and staff…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$20,051 in federal fines across 2 penalties. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

  • $8,406 — penalty dated 2025-06-27
  • $11,645 — penalty dated 2023-12-11
  • Medicare payment denial — starting 2025-07-23 for 28 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
ASM FAMILY FOUNDATIONOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 06/16/2020
MACATANGAY, HELENIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 06/16/2020
CORRO, GINAIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 06/16/2020
PERRY, ADELONAIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 06/16/2020

CMS files one row per role, so the 5 rows in the source record cover these 4 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$3.2M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-31.9%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 0%Medicare 14%Other / private 86%

A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$406per resident / day
operating cost
$12,341per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$308per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in California
$12,167/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$15,178/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,000/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 555757. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-06-27, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next