Crestwood Manor

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 194 beds and averages 152.4 residents a day — about 79% occupied, or roughly 42 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.44 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.36 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.97 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.85 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.68 on weekdays — 18% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.42 to 0.22 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 31% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

19 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 6 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2025-05-02 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure adequate supervision was provided to prevent accidents for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) when Resident 1 was assessed to be a high risk for falls and had a history of falls and effective interventions were not implemented to prevent a fall on [DATE]. Resident 1 was assessed to have an unsteady gait, educated on the need to call for assistance, had falls on [DATE], [DATE], [DATE]and fell on [DATE]. On [DATE], Resident 1 went to the bathroom unassisted, staff became aware of her presence in the bathroom alone, did not assist her with toileting, left her alone in the bathroom and Resident 1 fell and injured her right ankle. These failures resulted in Resident 1 not being provided with the level of assistance and supervision needed to prevent a fall, suffered an ankle injury requiring emergency transport to an acute care hospital for care and services and diagnosed with a fracture to the distal fibula [the lower, outer…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · Gcited before2024-03-26 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of four sampled residents (Resident 1) received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice when Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 1 administered psychoactive (medication that changes brain function and results in alterations in perception, mood, consciousness, cognition [pertaining to reasoning, memory and judgement], or behavior) medications not prescribed to Resident 1 in error. This failure resulted in Resident 1's transfer to the emergency department (ED) and admission to the general acute care hospital (GACH) for decreased mental status and treatment of an accidental overdose (dangerous and excessive dose of a drug). (Cross reference F 726, F 760) Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 3/11/24 at 11:39 a.m. with Resident 1 in the dining room, Resident 1 finished her meal, stood without assistance and walked down the hallway. Resident 1's gait (a person's manner of walking)…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · G2024-03-26 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
  Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of four sampled residents (Resident 1) was free of significant medication errors when Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 1 did not correctly identify Resident 1 and administered Resident 4's psychoactive (medication that changes brain function and results in alterations in perception, mood, consciousness, cognition [pertaining to reasoning, memory and judgement], or behavior) medications to her in error. This failure resulted in Resident 1 experiencing a change in mental status which required a transfer to the emergency department (ED) and admission to the general acute care hospital (GACH) for an accidental overdose (dangerous and excessive dose of a drug) of medication. (Cross reference F 658, F 726) Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 3/11/24 at 11:39 a.m. with Resident 1 in the dining room, Resident 1 finished her meal, stood without assistance and walked down the hallway. Resident 1's gait (a person's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-08-15 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
  Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, record review, facility document review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a written consent was obtained for in-room camera monitoring for 2 (Resident #103 and Resident #124) of 2 sampled residents reviewed for privacy. Findings included: An undated facility document titled, Consent for Identification Photograph, specified, [Facility name] may utilize audio or video recording and telecommunication if face-to-face services are not available and/or if the treatment team determines this to be an appropriate form of communication. A facility policy titled, Resident Rights, revised 10/2012, specified, 11. To be treated with consideration, respect and full recognition of dignity and individuality, including privacy in treatment and in care of personal needs. 1. An admission Record revealed the facility admitted Resident #103 on 10/12/2017. According to the admission Record, the resident had a medical history that included diagnoses of schizophrenia and adverse effects of unspecified antipsychotics and neuroleptics. A significant…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-15 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a care plan was implemented for in-room camera monitoring for 2 (Resident #103 and Resident #124) of 2 sampled residents reviewed for privacy. Findings included: A facility policy titled, Care Planning, revised 10/28/2017, specified, Policy A person-centered care plan to meet the individual needs of residents/clients is prepared by an Interdisciplinary Team, which is periodically reviewed and revised after subsequent assessments. 1. An admission Record revealed the facility admitted Resident #103 on 10/12/2017. According to the admission Record, the resident had a medical history that included diagnoses of schizophrenia and adverse effects of unspecified antipsychotics and neuroleptics. A significant change in status Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 05/20/2024, revealed Resident #103 had a Staff Assessment for Mental Status (SAMS), which indicated the resident had moderately impaired cognitive skills for daily decision making. The MDS indicated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-15 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure staff implemented enhanced barrier precautions when they performed wound care for 1 (Resident #113) of 1 sampled resident reviewed for pressure ulcer/injury. Findings included: A facility policy titled, Enhanced Barrier Precautions, revised 05/21/2024, indicated, 1. Identify residents at high risk for MDRO [multiple-drug resistant organisms] colonization and transmission. Use ESP [Enhanced Standard Precautions], primarily gowns and gloves for specific high contact care activities, based on the resident's characteristics that are associated with a high risk of MDRO colonization and transmission. *Presence of indwelling devices *Wounds or presence of pressure ulcer (unhealed). An admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident #113 on 02/25/2020. According to the admission Record, the resident had a medical history that included diagnoses of urinary incontinence and non-pressure chronic ulcer of the right ankle. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-03-26 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — pattern
  Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure licensed nurses have the specific competencies and skill sets necessary to assure residents maintained their highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being when one of three Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVN 1) did not correctly identify one of four sampled residents (Resident 1) during medication administration. This failure resulted in Resident 1 receiving Resident 4's medication and experiencing a change in mental status which required a transfer to the emergency department (ED) and admission to the general acute care hospital (GACH) for an accidental overdose (dangerous and excessive dose of a drug) of medication. (Cross reference F 658, F 760) Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 3/11/24 at 11:39 a.m. with Resident 1 in the dining room, Resident 1 finished her meal, stood without assistance and walked down the hallway. Resident 1's gait (a person's manner of walking) was slow and steady.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-10-26 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
  Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to report an alleged employee to resident physical abuse per their Policy and Procedure (P&P), Resident Allegations of Abuse by Staff for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1), when: 1. The facility did not notify the local law enforcement within 24 hours of the alleged abuse. 2. The facility did not perform a physical assessment of Resident 1 and did not notify a Physician, nor Psychiatrist of the alleged abuse incident. This failure placed Resident 1's safety at risk. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's Face Sheet (a summary of important information regarding a patient which include patient identification, past medical history, insurance status, care providers, family contact information and other pertinent information), the face sheet indicated, Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses, BIPOLAR DISORDER (disorder associated with episodes of mood swings), ANXIETY DISORDER (feelings of worry, anxiety or…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-12-19 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — pattern
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents and their Responsible Party (RP) were informed of psychotropic (affecting mental activity, behaviors, and perceptions) medications dosages and frequency in accordance with the facility policy and procedure and professional standards of quality for three of seven sampled residents (Resident 146, Resident 148, and Resident 471) when: 1. Resident 146 and the Responsible Party (RP) were not informed of the dosage amount and frequency duration of Resident 146's three psychotropic medications: paliperidone (a medication used to treat schizophrenia) (a disorder characterized by thoughts or experiences that seem out of touch with reality, disorganized speech or behavior, and decreased participation in daily activities), lithium carbonate (a medication to treat bipolar disorder) (a mental health condition that causes extreme mood swings), and mirtazapine (a medication to treat depression) (a mood disorder characterized by feelings of sadness…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2018-12-14 · tag F0577 — widespread
  Allow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the results of the Recertification, Abbreviated surveys and State agency (Department of Public Health Licensing and Certification -CDPHL&C) hotline phone number were located in a place readily accessible to the residents and the public for two of two sampled residents (Resident 16 and Resident 63). This failure denied residents and the public the right to be aware of Recertification, Abbreviated survey investigation results and access to the State agency hotline phone number. Findings: On 12/12/18 at 2:08 p.m., during an interview at the Resident Council meeting, Resident 16 and Resident 63 both stated they were not aware they could contact the State agency (Department of Public Health Licensing and Certification -CDPH L&C) for information, questions, concerns, and to submit complaints. Resident 16 and Resident 63 stated they did not know the hotline number for the State agency and the facility did not have the phone number posted for resident to access. On 12/12/18 at 2:10 p.m., during an interview at…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2018-12-14 · tag F0655 — widespread
  Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a baseline resident-centered care plans were developed and implemented to address residents' preference and safety while smoking for 14 of 14 sampled residents (Resident 14, Resident 22, Resident 70, Resident 75, Resident 90, Resident 100, Resident 105, Resident 116, Resident 127, Resident 146, Resident 150, Resident 151, Resident 156, and Resident 162) when residents' smoking care plans were not developed within 48 hours of admission. This failure had the potential to negatively affect residents quality of care by not addressing the resident's smoking preference and safety while smoking. Findings: On 12/12/18 at 8:12 a.m., during a concurrent observation and interview with the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON), Resident 70, Resident 105, Resident 15, Resident 162, Resident 75, Resident 116, Resident 146, and Resident 156 were smoking in the facility patio. The ADON stated smoking was allowed in designated areas and residents were supervised by Certified Nursing Assistants' (CNA). Review of facility residents…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2018-12-14 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — widespread
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure comprehensive resident-centered care plans (a plan that provides direction for individualized care of the resident) were developed and implemented to address residents' preference and safety while smoking for 14 of 14 sampled residents (Resident 14, Resident 22, Resident 70, Resident 75, Resident 90, Resident 100, Resident 105, Resident 116, Resident 127, Resident 146, Resident 150, Resident 151, Resident 156, and Resident 162) when 14 sampled residents did not have an individualized smoking care plan. This failure had the potential for residents smoking safety needs to go unmet. Findings: On 12/12/18 at 8:12 a.m., during a concurrent observation and interview with the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON), Resident 70, Resident 105, Resident 15, Resident 162, Resident 75, Resident 116, Resident 146, and Resident 156 were smoking in the facility patio. The ADON stated smoking was allowed in designated areas and residents were supervised by Certified Nursing Assistants' (CNA). Review of facility's residents smoking…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2018-12-14 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food was stored, prepared, distributed and served in accordance with professional standards for food services when: 1. Dietary [NAME] (DC) 1 served ready to eat food using gloved hands that had touched objects and surfaces outside of the trayline. 2. DC 2 did not perform hand hygiene before placing gloves on hands during lunch trayline service. 3. There were two steel pans not properly air dried in the dishware storage area. 4. The ice machine lid hinge was found dirty. 5. There was no open date on a lemon juice bottle. 6. There were spoiled lemons in the walk in refrigerator. These failures placed the residents at risk for consumption of unsafe food handling and storage of receptacles used for food preparation. Findings: 1. On 12/11/18 at 11:30 a.m., during a lunch meal observation, DC 1 and DC 2 serviced the food counter in the large dining room. The food service area was equipped with a washing sink and a box of gloves available for the staff use. DC 1 was observed placing on a pair of gloves…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

What families pay in CA