No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Carmel Hills Care Center

23795 W. R. Holman Highway, Monterey, CA 93940 · For profit - Corporation · 99 certified beds · (831) 624-1875 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (831) 624-1875 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citations — no harm found (F0604, F0605) — most recent Apr 2026
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (5/5)
  • lower-than-typical staff turnover (32% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
Worth asking about
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0604, F0605) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (39) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its payroll-based staffing score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

3/5
CMS overall
3 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 5 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 3 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's staffing rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the staffing score rests on the facility's own payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
12 Upper Ragsdale · (831) 648-7200 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
Safeway0.7 mi
815 Canyon Del Rey Blvd · (831) 393-2090 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
Safeway0.7 mi
815 Canyon del Rey Rd · (831) 393-2090 · Call to confirm hours
Park
900 Angelus Way · Typically dawn to dusk

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 3 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 3 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 2 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating3★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased19.8%10.2%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight3.6%4.0%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.6%0.8%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection3.6%1.2%2.0%worse
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms0.0%7.3%6.5%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.4%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury2.6%1.6%3.3%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened23.5%9.8%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication4.6%13.7%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%98.2%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers6.5%4.3%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control21.1%10.2%21.2%typical
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table7.3%12.0%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.6%1.5%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%93.2%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission31.4%23.0%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit15.8%11.2%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.712.251.67typical
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.151.571.80better

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

77.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 253 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

77.5%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
9.6%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
45.9%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.11U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.05hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.04hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.02hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 45.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 157 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.11 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 6% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 28% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF77.5%CMS range 71.2–82.051.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024better than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF9.6%CMS range 7.2–12.710.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge45.9%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge44.0%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge45.2%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified99.5%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened3.6%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization6.6%CMS range 3.8–9.57.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.861.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.60
RN hours/ resident / day
0.87
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.85
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.32
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.47
RN hoursweekends
31.6%
Total nursing turnover
25.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 99 beds and averages 95.8 residents a day — about 97% occupied, or roughly 3 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.32 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.60 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.85 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.84 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.51 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.65 to 0.47 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 32% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

19
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-04-17)
3
at the previous standard inspection (2024-12-19)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

39 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 29 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · F2026-04-17 · tag F0732 — widespread
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the daily staffing information posted was for the current day. This failure had the potential to result in nurse staffing misinformation to residents, families, and visitors.Findings:During a concurrent observation and interview with the director of nursing (DON) on 4/15/2026 at 9:48 a.m., in nurse station AA (NS AA), there was no daily staffing information posted. The DON confirmed the observation and tried to look around NS AA. The DON walked to the lobby's glass covered cork board and found the daily staffing information posted was dated 1/9/2025.During an observation on 4/15/2026 at 9:53 a.m., in nurse station BB (NS BB), there was a daily staffing information posted, dated 1/9/2025.During an interview with the administrator (ADM) on 4/15/2026 at 10:07 a.m., informed the ADM about the daily staffing information found posted in the lobby and in NS BB were dated 1/9/2025. The ADM stated the daily staffing information should have been updated daily and posted at the lobby.During a review of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-04-17 · tag F0801 — widespread
    Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to employ the director of food and nutrition services when the registered dietician was only employed part-time. This failure had the potential to negatively impact on food quality, sanitation, meal service, and residents' nutritional status for 92 residents in the facility.Findings:During a concurrent observation and interview on 4/13/2026 at 11:06 a.m. with the Head [NAME] (HC) in the kitchen, Dietary Manager (DM) was not present. The HC stated the prior DM resigned about 2 months ago, and the facility was in the process of recruiting a new one. The HC temporarily managed the kitchen.During an interview on 4/13/2026 at 11:30 a.m. with the administrator (ADM), the ADM stated the DM resigned since 2/12/2026. The facility only had part-time Registered Dietician (RD), who worked around 24 hours a week.During an interview on 4/13/2026 at 11:55 a.m., the ADM stated both the ADM and HC oversaw the overall operation of the kitchen now. RD's responsibilities were mainly to coordinate the menu, meet the residents,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-04-17 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure proper sanitation of two ice machines (one was in the utility room, one was in the hallway) when there was buildup around the ice dispenser chutes and ice discharge chutes of the two ice machines. These failures had the potential to increase the risk of food contamination to 92 residents in the facility.Findings:During an interview on 4/15/2026 at 9:46 a.m. with the Director of Environmental Services (DES), the DES stated there were two ice machines in the facility under the responsibility of maintenance services. The ice machines were cleaned internally by a contracted company every 90 days. The maintenance staff used sanitizer to wipe externally every day. 1. During a concurrent observation and interview on 4/15/2026 at 9:51 a.m. with the DES in the utility room near Station 2, an ice machine was observed to have white/yellow/orange/gray buildup around the ice dispenser chute. The DES stated the area around the ice dispenser chute looked like corrosive; it could be because of the age of the ice…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-04-17 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain respect and dignity for 9 of 18 sampled residents (Residents 61 69, 19, 95, 90, 3, 93, 54, and 39) when:1.Residents 61, 69, 19, 95, and 90's care instructions were posted above their head of bed's (HOB) wall, and other side of their room wall uncovered in a shared room;2. Residents 3, 93, and 54's care instructions were visibly posted; and,3. Resident 39's urine drainage bag (a pouch that attaches to a urinary catheter and collects urine) was not covered with a privacy bag.These failures had the potential to negatively affect residents' emotional and psychosocial well-being.Findings: 1a. Review of Resident 61's clinical record titled, admission Record, indicated Resident 61 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including polyneuropathy (a condition where multiple nerves throughout the body are damaged simultaneously causing numbness, tingling or pain, typically starting in the feet and hands), type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM -…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-04-17 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure to follow their policy and procedure (P&P) for an advance directive (AD, a written instruction, such as a living will or durable power of attorney [a document that authorizes a person to act on behalf of resident] for healthcare when individual incapacitated) for 5 of 22 sampled residents (Resident 1, 9, 118, 121, and 6) and completion of physician orders for life-sustaining treatment (POLST, a document that specifies the medical treatments the resident wants to receive during serious illness) form for 4 of 22 sampled residents (Resident 3, 7, 19, and 95) when: There was no documentation of AD for Residents 1,9,118, 121, and 6; and,POLST forms for Residents 3,7,19, and 95 were incomplete.These failures could lead to the delivery of medical services against sampled residents' goals and wishes. Findings: 1a. Review of Resident 1's face sheet (FS, document that provides resident's information at a quick glance) indicated Resident 1 was admitted to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-04-17 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — pattern
    Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure 3 out of 5 sampled residents (Residents 4, 7, and 87) were free from unnecessary psychotropic medications (drugs that affects brain activities associated with mental processes and behavior) when:1. Resident 4 received an order for PRN (as needed) lorazepam (an anti-anxiety medication) without a 14-day limit as required by the regulations and facility policy and procedures (P&P).2. Resident 7 received Seroquel (quetiapine- an antipsychotic medication) without documented evidence of attempted non-pharmacological (non-drug) interventions and without implementation of non-pharmacological interventions from the care plan.3. Resident 87 received citalopram (an antidepressant) and zolpidem (medication to manage insomnia) without evidence of non-pharmacological intervention implementation.These failures resulted in the potential for longer and unnecessary use of psychotropic medications, which has increased risks associated with psychotropic medication…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-04-17 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — pattern
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide restorative services for one of three residents (Resident 10) when documentation was missing or lacking regarding the service. This failure has the potential of the residents to experience a decrease in their range of motion (ROM) and possibly psychosocial well-being. Findings: During a review of Resident 10's Restorative Nursing Assistant (RNA) documentation, under the Tasks tab on 4/15/2026 at 1:32 PM, there was an entry for active Range of Motion (ROM), which indicated had been performed on 3/17/26 at 2:17 PM for 10 minutes, and passive ROM was performed on 3/17/26 at 2:17 PM for 5 minutes. During an interview with the director of staff development (DSD) on 4/15/2026 at 1:51 PM, the DSD stated RNAs document in alert listing report. The DSD stated there was nothing documented for ROM, so either Resident 10 refused or she was not seen from 1/15/26 - 2/14/26. She also stated there was no documentation from 2/15/26 - 3/16/26. She stated there is a note for ROM on 3/17/26 for passive ROM on upper extremity on one…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-04-17 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — pattern
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide renal dialysis (a life sustaining medical treatment that filters waste, excess fluids from blood when kidneys [bean shaped organ, responsible for removing waste products from blood, producing urine] failed to function) care and services consistent with professional standards of practice for two of two sampled residents (Resident 121 and 3) when dialysis follow up information forms were incomplete for 5 of 7 dialysis treatment days for Resident 121, and 7 of 10 dialysis treatment days for Resident 3. These failures had the potential to result in inappropriate follow-up care for Residents 121 and 3.Findings:Review of Resident 121's face sheet (FS, a document that gives information about resident at a quick glance) indicated Resident 121 was admitted to facility on 3/31/2026. Review of Resident 121's diagnoses included end state renal disease (permanent stage of kidney failure where kidney function decline below 10-15%) and dependence on renal dialysis.Review of Resident 121's clinical record indicated Resident 121 was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-17 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure accurate administration and disposal of medications when:1. An insulin pen (a pre-filled pen containing insulin- medication to lower blood sugar) was not correctly primed (the process of removing any air bubbles from the pen's needle and cartridge before an injection) during the medication administration observation for 1 of 1 resident (Resident 115). This had the potential for the resident to receive the incorrect amount of insulin for treatment.2. A nursing staff disposed of 3 medications in the sharps container instead of a designated pharmaceutical bin. This resulted in inappropriate waste of medications.3. A nursing staff prepared the wrong dose of spironolactone (medication for high blood pressure [BP] and heart conditions) during the medication administration observation for one of 7 residents (Resident 54). This had the potential for a medication error, which would lead to too low BP for the resident.4. Alendronate (medication to treat or prevent osteoporosis - a disease where decreased bone…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-04-17 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — pattern
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 5 sampled residents (Resident 19) was free from an unnecessary medication. Resident 19 has been receiving Prilosec (omeprazole, a medication in a class called proton pump inhibitors [PPI] to treat gastroesophageal reflux disease [GERD- condition where stomach acid flows back up into the esophagus and causes heartburn]) for approximately 3.5 years without documented risk versus benefit (R/B) assessment for continued, long-term use despite having osteoporosis (disease where decreased bone strength and mass significantly increase the risk of fractures), being at risk for osteoporosis-related fractures, and receiving multiple medications that increase fall risk. The failure resulted in the lack of documented R/B assessment and potential for increased risk for fractures from long-term use of a PPI, which according to the manufacturer, may be associated with an increased risk for osteoporosis-related fractures of the hip, wrist, or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 29 citations
  • Potential for harm · E2026-04-17 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food was served at an appetizing temperature when 11 out of 92 residents (Resident 34, 68, 9, 54, 123, 36, 59, 16, 85, 46, 74) complained hot food was served cold to them. This failure had the potential to affect the amount of food residents consume, which could decrease their food intake and lead to poor nutrition and health outcomes.Findings: During an initial room rounds and interview with Resident 34 on 4/13/2026 at 10:43 a.m., Resident 34 stated hot foods always served cold for all three meals. During an initial room rounds and interview with Resident 68 on 4/13/2026 at 11:19 a.m., Resident 68 stated hot foods always served cold, not even warm to eat. Resident 68 also stated likes to drink hot coffee, facility serving coffee not hot. During room rounds and interview with Resident 9 on 4/13/2026 at 1:55 p.m., Resident 9 stated hot foods always served cold. During room visit and interview with Resident 54 on 4/13/2026 at 2:23…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-17 · tag F0552 — isolated
    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure an informed consent (voluntary agreement to accept treatment and/or procedures after receiving education regarding the risks, benefits, and alternatives offered) was obtained prior to the administration of a psychotropic medication (drug that affect brain activities associated with mental processes and behavior) for 1 out of 7 residents (Resident 4). The failure had the potential for the resident/resident representative not being informed in advance of the risks and benefits of the medication, the treatment alternatives, or other options before making the decision for treatment.A review of Resident 4's clinical record indicated she was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including dementia (impaired ability to remember, think, or make decisions that interferes with doing everyday activities) and anxiety disorder.Review of Resident 4's physician orders indicated an order, dated 3/17/26, for lorazepam (medication for agitation and anxiety) 0.5 milligram, give 1 tablet by mouth every 1 hour as-needed for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-17 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure an even floor surface in facility's hallways. This failure presented a potential tripping hazard for residents who were using these hallways. Findings:During an observation on 4/13/2026 at 12:55 p.m., there was an uneven floor surface where carpeted flooring transitioned to wooden flooring in a hallway near Resident's room [ROOM NUMBER] (RR 1). Further observation indicated residents were passing by often, using walkers (a mobility aid designed with four legs with wheels and light weight to provide support while walking), wheel chairs (W/C, a mobility device designed for residents with mobility impairments to move around, propelled manually by user or by staff or powered electrically), and walking without a mobility device.During an observation on 4/14/2026 at 1:30 p.m., there was an uneven floor surface with missing and broken tile pieces in hallway near RR 2. This area was frequently used by residents that used walkers, W/C, and walked…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-17 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure fluid restrictions were followed for one of five sampled residents (Resident 3) and failed to initiate a care plan (an individualized, collaborative document that focuses on a resident specific needs, goals, preferences and values) for restricted fluids for one of three sampled resident (Resident 54). These failures had the potential to negatively affect Resident 3 and Resident 54's fluid balance.Findings:During a concurrent observation of Resident 3's room and interview with Resident 3 on 4/13/2026 at 11:35 a.m., a plastic re-usable cup with built-in straw was full of water atop a tray table next to Resident 3's bed and within reach of Resident 3. A posted fluid restriction with breakdown between dietary and nursing for total of 1800 ml ((milliliters, unit of volume equal to one thousandth of a liter) was on a wall within this room. Resident 3 stated nursing staff replaced water in the cup for him to drink throughout the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-17 · tag F0730 — isolated
    Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to conduct the Certified Nursing Assistant's (CNA) Annual Performance Evaluation (a formal, documented review of an employee's work over the past year, assessing their performance against established goals and expectations) for one (CNA M) of three sampled employees.This failure did not ensure CNA M had the necessary knowledge to provide safe resident care.Findings:Review of the facility's randomly selected three employee files indicated, CNA M was hired at the facility on 7/9/2013. There was no current annual performance evaluation found in CNA M's file.During an interview with the director of staff development (DSD) on 4/17/2026 at 10:22 a.m., DSD stated according to the business office records, CNA M had her last annual performance evaluation on 8/27/2023. DSD further stated they could not find the hard copy of the evaluation and the only reason they knew the date of her last evaluation was CNA M got a raise on that date. DSD confirmed all employees would get a raise every time they had their annual performance…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-17 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility had a medication error rate of 6.06% when 2 medication errors occurred out of 33 opportunities during the medication administration for 2 out of 7 residents (Residents 18 and 61). For Resident 61, metformin (medication to manage diabetes) was not administered with a meal as per manufacturer's specifications. Resident 18's olanzapine (an antipsychotic medication) ODT (oral disintegrating tablet - a solid dosage form that dissolves rapidly on the tongue) was crushed, a practice contrary to the accepted standards of practice.The deficient practice had the potential for adverse effects (such as stomach irritation) and ineffective use of medications for the residents.1. During the medication administration observation on 4/13/26 at 4:42 p.m., Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) C was observed preparing 2 medications for Resident 61 including a tablet of metformin 500 milligrams (mg, unit of measurement). On 4/13/26 at 4:43 p.m., LVN C brought the 2 medications with a small cup, about 3-4 ounces, of applesauce into Resident 61's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-17 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure 3 inhalers and 3 insulin pens (pre-filled pen containing insulin - medication to lower blood sugar) were given the expiration date in accordance with the manufacturer's specifications, and an expired and discontinued insulin pen was removed, in 1 out of 2 inspected medication carts. The failure had the potential for medication errors or residents being administered expired medications or given beyond the effective period.During an inspection of the Station 2 Pebble Beach Medication Cart with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) A and LVN B on 4/13/26 at 2:40 p.m., the following was identified and verified with both staff:a. The Incruse Ellipta inhaler (medication to treat chronic breathing problems) for Resident 24 was labeled with open date of 3/26/26 and the expiration date of 5/26/26 (2 months from open date). A review of the manufacturer's instructions on the inhaler box indicated, Discard the inhaler 6 weeks after opening the moisture-protective foil tray or when the counter reads '0' (after all…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-17 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow standard infection control practices when the following were observed:1. Undated nasal cannula (NC, light weight, flexible, medical device tube used to deliver oxygen [O2, a colorless, odorless and tasteless gas that is essential for life on earth, supplements for residents with breathing problem] for residents) for Resident 31,1, 44, 3, and 84;2. Undated nebulizer face mask (a medical device that fits over the nose and mouth to deliver liquid medication directly into the lungs [pair of organs, responsible to take O2 from air and transfer to blood] as a fine mist) for Resident 25 when not in use;3. Uncovered C-Pap (continuous positive airway pressure by delivering a steady, gentle stream of pressurized air through a mask to keep airway [the anatomical pathway from air to travel from nose and mouth to the lungs] open during sleep) face mask (designed to fit different breathing styles and sleeping positions) for Resident 34 and 118…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-17 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolated
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a safe and functional environment for kitchen staff when there was broken and buckled concrete flooring and condensed ice accumulation on the ceiling and on the floor in the walk-in freezer of the kitchen. These failures had the potential to create an unsafe environment for 23 staff in the kitchen.Findings:During a concurrent observation and interview on 4/13/2026 at 11:15 a.m. with the Head [NAME] (HC) in the walk-in freezer in the kitchen, the concrete floor was observed to be buckled and broken with multiple lines. The HC stated the floor had been in this condition for about three years, and the facility had a plan to fix it. In addition, some condensed ice accumulations were observed to be on the floor and on the ceiling. The HC stated it was slippery and not safe for the staff.During an interview on 4/14/2026 at 2:44 p.m. with the administrator (ADM), the ADM was aware of the damaged floor in the walk-in freezer in the kitchen. He stated it was found during the last recertification survey in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-12-19 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure food was thawed per the facility policy, there was not a crack in the kitchen floor, utensils were stored per the facility policy, the food drains were cleaned daily, there was not a build-up around the ice machine dispenser, and expired food items were discarded after their expiration date. These deficient practices had the potential to affect all residents who received food from the kitchen. Findings included: A facility policy titled, Handling Clean Equipment and Utensils, with a copyright date of 2017, revealed 4. Stored utensils should be covered or inverted whenever possible. A facility policy titled, General Food Preparation and Handling, with a copyright date of 2017, revealed, 3. Food Preparation a. Meats, fish and poultry will be defrosted using safe thawing practices: In the refrigerator in a drip proof container, and in a manner that prevents cross contamination. In the microwave if foods are cooked and served…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-12-19 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, document review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to develop a water management program that specified a detailed description and diagram of the water system in the facility. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all 91 residents who currently reside in the facility. Findings included: A facility policy titled, Legionella Water Management Program, revised 07/2017, revealed 3. The purposes of the water management program are to identify areas in the water system where Legionella bacteria could grow and spread, and to reduce the risk of Legionnaires' disease. The policy specified, 5. The water management program includes the following elements: a. An interdisciplinary water management team; b. A detailed description and diagram of the water system in the facility, including the following: (1) Receiving; (2) Cold water distribution; (3) Heating; (4) Hot water distribution; and (5) Waste. c. The identification of areas in the water system that could encourage the growth and spread of Legionella or other waterborne bacteria, including: (1)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-19 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure licensed staff locked 1 of 4 medication carts when the cart was not within the sight of the nurse during medication administration. Findings included: A facility policy titled, Administering Medications, revised 04/2019, revealed, 19. During administration of medications, the medication cart is kept closed and locked when out of sight of the medication nurse or aide. During medication administration observation on 12/17/2024 at 8:24 AM, a medication cart was found unlocked, and Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) #1 was in a resident room, behind a privacy curtain and the medication cart was out of her line of sight. Three minutes later, LVN #1 returned to the medication cart. At 8:38 AM, 8:42 AM, and 8:56 AM, LVN #1 left the medication unlocked and out of her sight when she administered medication to Residents #9, #10, and #61. During an interview on 12/17/2024 at 9:13 AM, LVN #1 stated she should have locked the medication cart when she walked away from the medication cart. LVN #1 acknowledged…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-03-28 · tag F0801 — widespread
    Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and facility document review, the facility failed to ensure the Registered Dietitian comprehensively carried out the functions and evaluated the effectiveness of Food and Nutrition Services as evidenced by: Lapses in the delivery of services associated with: staff competency (cross-reference F802), following the menu (cross-reference F803), providing physician prescribed diet orders (cross-reference 808), food safety and sanitation (cross-reference F812), providing physician prescribed nutrition supplements (cross-reference F692), physical environment of the kitchen (cross-reference 908). Failure to ensure dietetic services systems are accurately and effectively delivered may result in compromising the nutritional status of the residents by not assessing their nutritional needs, the potential transmission of foodborne illness, and/or a decreased nutritional intake due to not receiving the correct foods. Findings: During the annual recertification survey conducted from 3/21/22 to 3/28/22 there were multiple issues identified with respect to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2022-03-28 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — widespread
    Provide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and facility document record review, the facility failed to ensure staff competency when: 1. The staff members were unable to properly test the dish machine's sanitizer and were not routinely testing the concentration of the dish machine's sanitizer and wash and rinse temperature. 2. Two of three staff members were unable to test the red bucket's sanitizer correctly and two red buckets' sanitizer concentration was not consistently tested for the month of March. 3. The FSW M did not follow the pureed preparation for vegetables. 4. The FSW M did not follow the recipes for the honey glazed pork and the fresh baked sweet potatoes served for lunch on 3/21/22. These failures had the potential to result in compromising the health and safety of the 71 residents in the facility. Finding: 1. During a concurrent observation and interview with food service worker O (FSW O) on 3/22/22 at 9:30 a.m., inside the dish room, FSW O was unable to verbalize the process on how to check if the dish…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-03-28 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and facility document review, the facility failed to ensure food was stored, prepared, distributed, and served in accordance with professional standards for food safety when: 1. An ice machine was not kept in a sanitary condition; 2. Thawed meat was kept in the refrigerator for an extended period of time; 3. A red bucket with sanitizer was left on a food production surface; 4. A food contact surface sanitizer had inconsistent strength; 5. A protein based nutritional supplement was held above 41 degrees Fahrenheit (F, a temperature scale) for an extended period of time; 6. Food containers were stacked wet; 7. Kitchen floors had some black build up to corners of each storage area leading to the back door; 8. Spills of rice were found at the cart beside the rice container; 9. The lid of a flour container had a crack; 10. Storage rack had some brownish and blackish build up; and 11. Personal belongings were found hanging inside the dry storage area. These failures had the potential…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-03-28 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to implement infection control measures when: 1. The facility's screening process for Coronavirus disease (COVID-19, a disease caused by a contagious virus) was not in accordance with Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidelines; 2. The receptionist did not follow the facility's Screening Checklist when screening a visitor for COVID-19; 3. One dietary staff member was not screened for COVID-19 prior to entering the facility; 4. There were no receptacles (containers) inside the residents' rooms to dispose of used gowns in the yellow zone (area designated for resident with known or possible exposure to COVID-19); 5. One CNA did not use and dispose of personal protective equipment (PPE, mask, gown, gloves, eye protection) appropriately when providing care to Resident 3; 6. A receptacle designated for soiled adult diapers was left uncovered in the hallway; 7. The infection preventionist (IP) did not change her gown when performing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-03-28 · tag F0582 — pattern
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a Skilled Nursing Facility Advance Beneficiary Notice of Non-Coverage (SNF ABN, a notice that transfers potential financial liability) to two of three residents (Residents 27 and 60). This failure had the potential to compromise the residents' right to appeal (apply for reversal of) the facility's decision to discontinue Medicare Part A services (skilled treatments paid for by Medicare). This failure also had the potential to result in the residents or residents' representatives not being informed of their payment responsibilities to the facility after Medicare Part A services ended. Findings: Review of Resident 27's medical record indicated she was admitted to the facility under Medicare Part A on 6/30/2021. The medical record further indicated Resident 27 came off Medicare Part A on 7/8/2021 and continued living in the facility. Review of Resident 27's SNF Beneficiary Protection Notification Review, filled out by the facility on 3/24/2022, indicated the facility initiated Resident 27's discharge from Medicare…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-03-28 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — pattern
    Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to perform re-evaluation restraint assessments in a timely manner for three of five residents (Residents 62, 63, and 27), when restraint assessments were not performed on at least a quarterly basis. This failure had the potential of residents being physically restrained when not medically indicated. Findings: 1. During an observation on 3/21/22 at 12:37 p.m. in Resident 62's room, Resident 62 was observed sitting in her wheelchair with a seatbelt around her waist. During a review of Resident 62's electronic records, no quarterly restraint assessments were found. Resident 62 had cognitive impairment. During an interview on 3/25/22 at 9:54 a.m., with the director of nursing (DON), DON stated she did not see any quarterly restraint assessments for Resident 62. 2. During an observation on 3/21/22 at 12:08 p.m., Resident 63 was wheeling herself in the hallway seated in a wheelchair with a seatbelt around her waist. During a review of Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-03-28 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure licensed nurses (incoming shift nurse and outgoing shift nurse) consistently signed off the Correct Count Verification sheet/form for controlled medications that indicated they acknowledged accuracy and accountability of controlled drugs for two of four medication carts. This failure had the potential for inaccurate recording and accounting of controlled medications. Findings: During an inspection of Nursing Station 1's Carmel and Monterey medication carts on 3/21/22 at 3:40 p.m., with licensed vocational nurse A (LVN A), LVN A confirmed there were multiple missing signatures found in the Correct Count Verification sheet for February and March 2022 for both carts. During the concurrent interview with LVN A, she stated both nurses who were coming in for the shift and going off shift should sign the form every shift. During an interview with the pharmacy consultant (PC) on 03/24/22 at 9:50 a.m., the PC concurred two nurses (incoming and outgoing shift nurses) should have signed the correct count sheet…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-03-28 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to properly store medications in four of four medication carts and in one of two medication refrigerators when: 1. Multi-dose vials and liquid medications were not dated when opened and discarded when expired (beyond due date). 2. Expired medications were not disposed accordingly. 3. Multiple eyedrops/ointment opened and not dated, expired eyedrops not discarded and disposed. 4. Internal medications (oral medications) were mixed with external medications. These failures had the potential for administration of wrong and expired medications which could placed residents at risk for adverse drug reactions and possible complications. Findings: During an inspection of Station 2 medication refrigerator on 3/21/222 at 9:50 a.m., with licensed vocational nurse D (LVN D), there was a multidose tuberculin vial opened not dated. LVN D stated the vial should have been dated when opened. During an inspection of Station 1 Monterey medication cart on 3/21/22 at 3:40 p.m., with licensed vocational nurse A (LVN A), there were two…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-03-28 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, and facility document review, the facility failed to ensure the planned menu was followed and the nutrient needs were met when: 1. Milk was not served according to the menu for a random sample of 16 residents (Residents 61, 274, 275, 54, 19, 3, 53, 27, 276, 9, 10, 7, 42, 51, 22, 2); 2. Fourteen of 14 residents (Residents 22, 10, 17, 5, 61, 64, 38, 73, 40, 48, 25, 54, 34, 41) on CCHO regular texture diet (carbohydrate controlled diets, diets designed for people with diabetes that evenly spread carbohydrates throughout the meals) when they were served the wrong portion size for sweet potatoes; 3. Seven of seven residents (Residents 33, 45, 29, 27, 71, 63, 15) on puree diets (texture modified diets for people with chewing or swallowing difficulties) when they were served the wrong portion size for pork chop and zucchini, 4. Two residents (Residents 72 and 18) with a preference for no meat did not receive a good source of protein for lunch. These failures had the potential to result in not meeting the nutritional needs thus further compromising the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-03-28 · tag F0808 — failed to follow doctor-ordered diets — pattern
    Ensure therapeutic diets are prescribed by the attending physician and may be delegated to a registered or licensed dietitian, to the extent allowed by State law.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, and facility document review, the facility failed to assure residents consistently received a fortified diet as prescribed by a physician when two out of 33 residents on a fortified diet did not receive any fortified foods, and six out of 33 residents on fortified diets received minimal extra calories at one meal. These failures had the potential to result in not meeting the nutritional needs and further compromising the nutritional status of the 33 residents on fortified diets. Findings: Review of facility document titled Fortified Diet from the facility's diet manual, dated 2012, indicated The fortified diet is designed for residents who cannot consume adequate amounts of calories and/or protein to maintain their weight or nutritional status. It further indicated The amount of calorie and protein increase will vary depending on the facilities current Fortification of Food policy and the individual residents needs and preferences. No other fortified diet policy was provided when requested. During an interview on 3/21/22 at 12:05 p.m.,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-03-28 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — pattern
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to: 1. Track, offer and administer pneumococcal vaccines (vaccines intended to prevent lung infection) according to Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidelines for three of five sampled residents (Residents 20, 26 and 27); and 2. Perform screening prior to administering the influenza (respiratory infection) vaccine for one of five sampled residents (Resident 43). These failures had the potential to negatively affect the residents' health and well-being. Findings: 1. Review of the CDC's guidance titled Vaccines and Preventable Diseases (https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/vpd/pneumo/hcp/who-when-to-vaccinate.html), last reviewed 1/24/2022, indicated there are two types of pneumococcal vaccines available in the United States; pneumococcal conjugate vaccines (PCV13, PCV15, and PCV20) and pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine (PPSV23). For adults ages 19 to 64 who have risk factors, such as chronic renal failure (a kidney disease), the guidance…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-03-28 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — pattern
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure the kitchen's physical environment was free from accident hazards and equipment was in good working condition when: 1. The magnetic mesh screen at the kitchen's back door was not fully closed, the kitchen floor had a tear, and the floor coving was completely detached from the bottom part of the wall; 2. The floor drains were not emptied and cleaned; and, 3. Residents' food trays were broken exposing the metal parts at the edge. These failures had the potential to affect the health and safety of staff and 71 residents at the facility by possible exposure to disease carrying pests, hazards and injuries. Findings: 1a. During an observation on 3/21/22 at 11:31 a.m., the magnetic mesh screen located at the back of the kitchen was halfway opened. During an observation on 3/22/22 at 11:25 a.m., the magnetic mesh screen had some holes, and the bottom part was not sealed. According to Food and Drug Administration [FDA]-Food Code 2017 Section 6-202.15, it is the standard of practice to ensure the outer opening of a food…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-03-28 · tag F0554 — isolated
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the interdisciplinary team (IDT, facility staff members from different departments including nursing who coordinate care provided to residents) assessed whether it was safe for one of 19 sampled residents (Resident 36) to keep her medications at the bedside and had a physician's order to administer the medication. These failures had the potential for incorrect self-medication administration and wrong medication. Findings: During the initial tour on 3/21/22 at 10:39 a.m., there was a Bengay cream (a topical cream used to treat minor aches and pains of the muscles/jointspain cream) found on top of Resident 36's tray table. During a concurrent interview with Resident 36 she stated, I have been using that for my right shoulder pain. During the record review with licensed vocational nurse C (LVN C) on 3/21/22 at 10:43 a.m., she could not find physician's order for the Bengay medication, and no documented evidence that a self-administration assessment and care plan was completed. During a concurrent interview…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-03-28 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide physician ordered nutrition supplements (products that are used to complement a resident's dietary needs, a high calorie drink in this case) to one resident (Resident 71) with a history of weight loss and pressure injury. This failure had the potential to cause further weight loss and decline in health status. Findings: A review of Resident 71's clinical record, indicated Resident 71 was admitted with diagnoses including cerebral infarction (a stroke caused by narrowing of the blood vessel in the brain), and right sided weakness caused by the stroke, dysphagia (difficulty swallowing caused by stroke), and Alzheimer's disease, unspecified (a progressive disease that destroys memory and other important mental functions). A review of Resident 71's Admission's Minimum Data Set (MDS, an overall assessment of resident's status) assessment, dated 7/12/21, indicated the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score was 99 (with severe cognitive impact), requiring extensive assistance with eating and weight…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-03-28 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolated
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a licensed nurse and student nursing assistant (SNA) had the specific competencies necessary to care for two of 19 sampled residents (Residents 11 and 60) when licensed vocational nurse A (LVN A) did not correctly demonstrate the proper use of insulin syringe, and when SNA turned off Resident 60's oxygen without informing the charge nurse. These failures had the potential for Resident 11 and 60 to not attain or maintain their highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. Findings: 1. During an observation on 3/22/22 at 12:08 p.m., Resident 60 was up in her wheelchair with her oxygen on via nasal cannula. She was heard requesting SNA to turn off her oxygen. The SNA turned if off herself without informing her charge nurse. During the concurrent interview with the DSD and licensed vocational nurse A (LVN A), charge nurse and infection preventionist (IP), the DSD stated SNA was doing her clinical hours in the facility as a student nursing assistant and should not have turned off the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-03-28 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — isolated
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow its antibiotic stewardship program (program intended to prevent the overuse of antibiotics) when antibiotics were prescribed for one of one sampled residents (Resident 8) without the use of the protocols outlining clinical symptoms to confirm the presence of an infection. This failure had the potential to increase the prevalence of multi-drug resistant organisms in the facility. Findings: Review of Resident 8's medical record indicated she was admitted on [DATE] and did not have an indwelling catheter (flexible tube inserted and left in the bladder to drain urine). Review of Resident 8's medication administration record (MAR) indicated she received the following antibiotics: 1. Ceftriaxone 1 gram (gm, unit of dose measurement) intramuscularly (IM, injected into a muscle) for urinary tract infection (UTI) from 6/23/2021 to 6/25/2021; and 2. Augmentin 500-125 milligrams (mg, unit of dose measurement) by mouth every 12 hours for UTI from 12/26/2021…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-03-28 · tag F0888 — isolated
    Ensure staff are vaccinated for COVID-19
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement policies and procedures that were in accordance with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommendations when it allowed medical exemptions and deferments from Coronavirus disease (COVID-19, a disease caused by a contagious virus) vaccinations for two of two staff members who were pregnant. Both staff members worked in the facility under this exemption. As a result, the facility's staff vaccination rate was 98.2% on [DATE]. In addition, the facility failed to ensure staff who were not fully vaccinated adhered to appropriate precautions to mitigate risk for COVID-19 spread. These failures increased the risk for COVID-19 exposure and infection to residents and staff. Findings: Review of the facility's Appendix B, Physician's Verification of Request for Medical Exemption or Pregnancy Deferral from COVID-19 Vaccination, dated [DATE], indicated staff member R (SM R) requested a pregnancy deferral from COVID-19…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
BOWERSOX, KIMIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE50%since 10/30/2004
BOWERSOX, ROBERTIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE50%since 10/30/2004
HELENIUS, MIKKOIndividualCONTRACTED MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 06/01/2010
DORSEY, CAROLEIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 06/06/2014
TUBERA, MELANIEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 04/01/2014

CMS files one row per role, so the 7 rows in the source record cover these 5 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$14.2M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-6.9%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1.6M
Related-party expense11% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 50%Medicare 23%Other / private 27%

This home reported $1.6M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 11% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$528per resident / day
operating cost
$16,057per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$494per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in California
$12,167/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$15,178/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,000/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 056055. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-04-17, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next