No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Napa Community Health Center

1800 Pueblo Ave, Napa, CA 94558 · For profit - Individual · 49 certified beds · (707) 224-7925 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (707) 224-7925 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citations — no harm found (F0605, F0610) — most recent Jun 20263 actual-harm citations$48,355 in federal fines1 Medicare payment denial
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

In its favor
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
Worth asking about
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has 3 actual-harm citations
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (38) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $48,355 in federal fines (most recent 2026-06-05)
  • its payroll-based staffing score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 4 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 2 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's staffing rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the staffing score rests on the facility's own payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
3273 Claremont Way · (707) 254-7117 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
Oportun0.4 mi
2412 Jefferson St · (707) 200-6941 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
2993 Jefferson St · (707) 257-7188 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Marin St · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 2 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 1 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 3 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 3 to 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased29.1%10.2%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight2.3%4.0%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder1.5%0.8%0.9%worse
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection9.9%1.2%2.0%worse
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms9.7%7.3%6.5%worse
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.4%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury4.3%1.6%3.3%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened23.0%9.8%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication7.6%13.7%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%98.2%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers1.5%4.3%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control26.6%10.2%21.2%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table21.1%12.0%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication2.7%1.5%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine85.0%93.2%79.4%typical
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission30.4%23.0%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit14.2%11.2%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days3.762.251.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days2.341.571.80worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

61.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 35 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

61.0%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.4%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
77.1%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.26U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.22hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.03hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.01hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 77.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 35 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.26 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 37% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 53% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy at close to weekday levels right through the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF61.0%CMS range 49.6–75.351.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.4%CMS range 6.5–14.610.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge77.1%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge74.3%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge80.0%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified97.7%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay2.3%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened2.3%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.5%CMS range 3.8–12.97.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.011.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.97
RN hours/ resident / day
1.34
LPN hours/ resident / day
3.60
Aide hours/ resident / day
5.92
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.47
RN hoursweekends
Total nursing turnover
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 49 beds and averages 29.4 residents a day — about 60% occupied, or roughly 20 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 5.92 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.97 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.60 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.99 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 6.29 on weekdays — 21% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 1.18 to 0.47 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

19
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-06-05)
8
at the previous standard inspection (2024-04-26)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

38 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 25 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · G2026-06-05 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the nursing staff failed to provide care that met professional standards of nursing for two residents (Resident 3 and Resident 8) of 16 sampled residents when:1. Nurses did not assess, prevent, and identify the development of a pressure injury (localized, pressure-related damage to the skin and/or underlying tissue usually over a bony prominence) on Resident 3's left cheek; and,2. Nurses did not notify the physician when Resident 8 experienced significant and progressive weight loss.These failures resulted in Resident 3 obtaining a facility-acquired Stage 2 pressure injury (a partial-thickness loss of skin, presenting as a shallow open sore or wound) and Resident 8 unhappy and concerned about her weight loss. Cross Reference F684, F692.Findings:1. A review of Resident 3's admission record indicated she was admitted to the facility in February 2021 with the diagnosis of long-term use of anticoagulants (medication used to prevent blood clots from forming or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · G2026-06-05 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one resident (Resident 8) of four sampled residents received necessary care and services to prevent continued weight loss when:Resident 8's weight loss went unaddressed;Nursing staff did not notify the physician of Resident 8's weight loss; and,There was no Registered Dietician to provide oversight.These failures decreased the facility's potential to maintain Resident 8's nutritional status (the state of health determined by balance of nutrient intake, absorption, and the body's physiological needs) which placed Resident 8 at risk for worsening malnutrition, further weight loss, and a decline in overall health. Cross Reference F658, F835Findings:A review of Resident 8's admission record indicated Resident 8 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with Acute on Chronic Systolic and Diastolic Heart Failure (a long term condition in which the heart is too weak to pump efficiently and too stiff to fill with blood) and Chronic Kidney Failure (a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · G2026-03-26 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow FDA (U.S. Food and Drug Administration) Black Box Warnings (or BBW, the most stringent safety warning required by the FDA for prescription drugs) and manufacturer specification for dosing a fentanyl transdermal patch (a powerful synthetic opioid, 50 to 100 times more potent than morphine, that is absorbed through the skin for consistent pain relief) for one of three sampled patients, Resident 1 when:1. Resident 1's fentanyl patch initiation on 11/26/25 did not follow FDA Black Box Warnings and manufacturer specification on starting dose based on history of opioid use, old age, and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (or COPD, a long-term lung inflammation and obstruction, making it hard to breathe without medication or supplemental oxygen).2. Resident 1's fentanyl dose increase, which doubled the dosage, on 1/30/26 also did not follow FDA and manufacturer dose escalation guidelines, soon after administration of Norco and anxiety medication called lorazepam (or Ativan, anti-anxiety drug) in span of 1.5 hours apart…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-06-05 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — widespread
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and document review, the facility failed to ensure resident rights were exercised when:1. A census of 24 residents and/or their Responsible Parties (RP) were not informed about their right to vote on June 2, 2026 for a primary election for state government elected officials; and,2. One resident (Resident 22) of three sampled residents did not have their final wishes followed when staff allowed family members to sign their Physician Order for Life Sustaining Treatment (POLST) forms when they did not have the legal authority to do so.These failures resulted in 24 residents not being informed of their right to vote by the facility, and Resident 22 being consented as Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) by people who were not authorized to make that decision. Cross Reference F942 Findings: 1. During the Resident Council meeting on 6/3/26 at 11 a.m., attended by Residents 1, 3, 6, 11, 12, 14, 16, 21, 26, and 27, the interim Activities Director (IAD), the Ombudsman, and this surveyor. All residents in attendance stated they had not voted yesterday. During an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2026-06-05 · tag F0801 — widespread
    Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility's Administration failed to ensure the Dietary Manager (DM) had the required qualifications to manage the facility's kitchen in a skilled nursing facility in California.This failure decreased the facility's potential to ensure safe food handling and the prevention of food-borne illness in a highly susceptible population of 24 residents. Cross Reference F835Findings:In an interview on 6/4/26 at 9:45 a.m., DM stated he had been employed at the facility for six years and had been in the position of DM for approximately three months when the previous DM resigned. The DM stated he had a ServeSafe(R) Manager certificate (a nationally accredited certificate in food safety that is required by law in many states) but did not have a Certified Dietary Manager (CDM) certification. The DM stated he qualified for the Certified Dietary Manager examination, was in the process of registering, but he currently did not have a date to take the exam. The DM further stated he was not a nutritionist, stating, I have not done the 900 hours. In an interview…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-06-05 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility's dietary staff failed to store food in a sanitary manner for a census of 24 when:Multiple boxes in the dry pantry were either misdated or not dated;Multiple food items in the food pantry were stored improperly, not dated, or expired;Multiple food items in the walk-in refrigerator were stored improperly, not dated, or expired;Multiple spices on the spice shelf were undated or expired;Food being prepared to be cooked was expired;The floor and blender were found dirty; and,The Dietary Manger (DM) did not adhere to the hair containment policy.These failures decreased the facility's potential to prevent the transmission of foodborne illnesses throughout the facility.Findings:1. In an initial observation of the dry pantry on 6/2/26 at 5:41 a.m., this surveyor observed no dates to indicate when the item was received and two cans of cranberry sauce which were labeled 11/15.In a concurrent observation and interview with the DM on 6/2/26 at 10:26 a.m., the DM stated, I inspect the food, unpackage them, and make sure there are no…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2026-06-05 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — widespread
    Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure trash was stored in a sanitary manner for a census of 24 residents when trash dumpsters were observed left open.This failure decreased the facility's potential to prevent a nuisance or breeding ground for insects and rodents.Findings:In an observation on 6/2/26 at 5:41 a.m., Trash Dumpster 1 (TD 1) was observed open with no one in attendance, and TD 2 had a four-inch gap between the lids; furthermore, the lid was cracked and broken. In a concurrent observation and interview the Dietary Manager (DM) on 6/2/26 at 10:34 a.m., the DM stated, Someone forgot to close this, as he closed TD 1. The DM stated trash dumpsters were expected to be closed when not in active use. The DM also stated the lids should be intact. During multiple observations on 6/2/26 at 5:41 a.m., 10:34 a.m., and at 11:40 am; on 6/3/26 at 4:26 p.m.; on 6/4/26 at 12:17 p.m. and 4:45 p.m.; and on 6/5/26 at 7:22 a.m., 12:51 a.m., and 1:37 p.m., TD 1 was observed open and unattended.A review of the facility's policy titled, General Waste…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2026-06-05 · tag F0851 — widespread
    Electronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the electronic submission of the Payroll Based Journal (PBJ, a system by which skilled nursing facilities submit staffing information to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid) data as required quarterly for a census of 24 residents when the Certification and Survey Provider Enhanced Reporting system (CASPER, an assortment of real-time reports that allows SNFs the opportunity to pinpoint areas where changes in care and operations are necessary to improve performance) report indicated there was no information for the first quarter (Q1-1/26 through 3/26). This failure prevented regulatory agencies, residents, and residents' families from being able to verify that facilities had enough staff to provide necessary care to residents. Findings: During an interview on 6/4/26 at 1:30 p.m., the Social Services Designee (SSD) stated she was responsible for submitting the PBJ data. The SSD stated when she attempted to submit the first quarter data, she ran into internet related issues which prevented her from transmitting the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-06-05 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the laundry staff failed to prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for a census of 24 residents when clean linens were not transported by methods that protected from dust, soil, moisture, and infectious organisms during transport within the facility.This failure decreased the facility's potential to prevent the transmission of infectious pathogens (tiny organisms that can make you sick if they get inside your body) residents in the facility.Findings:During a concurrent observation and interview on 6/5/26 at 9:04 a.m., with Housekeeping Staff 1 (HS 1), HS 1stated the person who usually did the laundry was on leave. HS 1 showed this surveyor a gray container labeled cube truck and stated the container was used to transport clean linen to the clean linen storage inside the facility. An observation of the container found it had a gaping hole on one side of it as it sat outside of the laundry room over pavement which had soil and small rocks within a foot of the container. The HS 1…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2026-06-05 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — widespread
    Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, observation, and document review, the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program when a cockroach was seen inside the facility's beauty shop. This failure decreased the facility's potential to prevent contamination of food supplies and respiratory distress among residents when cockroach droppings are inhaled.Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview with Licensed Nurse 1 (LN 1) inside the facility's beauty shop on 6/2/26 at 9:35 a.m., a live cockroach lying on its back was seen on the floor. LN 1 stated, I think it is a cockroach .Residents can get an infection if cockroaches are in the facility. During an interview with the Maintenance Worker (MW) on 6/2/26 at 9:50 a.m., the MW stated there were complaints of cockroaches in room [ROOM NUMBER] three weeks ago and room [ROOM NUMBER], one week ago. The MW stated traps were set and checked weekly. The MW stated the last time he checked the two traps he placed in room [ROOM NUMBER], there was a cockroach found in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2026-06-05 · tag F0942 — widespread
    Ensure that staff members are educated on resident rights and facility responsibilities to properly care for its residents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews, observations, and document review, the facility failed to ensure staff members were educated on residents' rights for a census of 24 residents , when the Social Services Designee (SSD), the Interim Activities Director (IAD), and the Assistant Administrator (AADM) unaware they were responsible for providing residents the ability and option to vote during an election. This failure denied eligible and willing residents who wanted to exercise their right to vote as citizens of the United States. Cross reference F550, F942Findings:During the Resident Council meeting on 6/3/26 at 11 a.m., attended by Residents 1, 3, 6, 11, 12, 14, 16, 21, 26, and 27, the interim Activities Director (IAD), the Ombudsman, and this surveyor. All residents in attendance stated they had not voted yesterday. During an interview with the Social Services Designee (SSD) on 6/3/26 at 2:37 p.m., the SSD stated none of the residents came to ask for transportation to be able to vote. The SSD stated she was not following the election and stated she was unaware of the California Primary election on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-06-05 · tag F0552 — pattern
    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to obtain informed consent for one resident (Resident 3) of three sampled residents when Resident 3's Responsible Party (RP) did not have legal authorization to provide consent.This failure decreased the facility's potential to provide Resident 3 the ability to make her own medical decisions.Findings:A review of Resident 3's admission record indicated she was admitted in February, 2021 with the diagnosis of unspecified dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities), unspecified severity, without behavioral disturbances, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance and anxiety. A Minimum Data Set (MDS- a federally mandated resident assessment tool), dated 3/10/26, indicated she had mild memory impairment.A review of Resident 3's informed consent for psychotropic medications, Trazadone, dated 3/19/25 by the physician, indicated it was signed by Resident 3's son on 3/24/25. A review of Resident 3's informed consent for psychotropic medications, Lexapro, dated 6/20/25 and Buspirone, dated 10/7/25, indicated they were…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-06-05 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Advance Directives (AD - a legal document indicating resident preference on end-of-life treatment decisions) and Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (POLST - a form that contains written medical orders for healthcare professionals regarding specific medical treatments that can or cannot be done at the end-of-life) were formulated for five of 16 residents (Resident 3, Resident 22, Resident 5, Resident 7, and Resident 6).This failure increased the risk for the residents to receive unwanted, aggressive and invasive life-sustaining treatment during a sudden medical crisis and exclude the resident and resident's family from crucial decision making. Cross Reference F835 Findings: A review of Resident 3's admission record indicated she was admitted in February 2021 with the diagnosis of unspecified dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities), unspecified severity, without behavioral disturbances, psychotic disturbance, mood…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 25 citations
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-06-05 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews, the facility did not maintain hot water temperatures within safe regulatory limits when water temperatures in multiple resident-use restrooms were measured above 120 degrees Fahrenheit (F, a unit measurement of heat) for 16 residents out of a facility census of 24. This failure decreased the facility's potential to provide a hazard-free environment and prevent thermal injury. Cross Reference F835Findings:During a concurrent interview and observation in Resident 8's room on 6/3/26 at 8:15 a.m., Resident 8 stated she was bothered by not having any cold water in her restroom. Upon entering Resident 8's restroom and turning on the cold-water tap, the surveyor observed the water was lukewarm. When the hot water tap was turned on, the water became too hot to safely hold hands under, even briefly. A calibrated thermometer was obtained, and the hot water temperature measured 128.5 degrees F.During observations on 6/3/26 between 8:15 a.m. and 8:45 a.m., hot water temperatures were…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-05 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
    Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the medical and nursing staff failed to ensure one resident (Resident 5) out of four sampled residents received a gradual dose reduction (GDR) and behavioral interventions when Resident 5 was given a psychotropic (medication that alter brain chemistry to affect mood, thoughts, behavior and perception) drug.This failure decreased the facility's potential to ensure Resident 5 was not given unnecessary psychotropic medication without evaluating its effectiveness or necessity. Cross Reference F835Findings:A review of Resident 5's admission record indicated she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Polymyositiis (a rare, chronic condition that causes swelling, heat, and pain to the skeletal muscles) and major depressive disorder (a mood disorder characterized by feelings of sadness, emptiness and a loss of interest in activities).A review of Resident 5's care plan, revised on 11/20/25, indicated Resident 5 was receiving a psychotropic medication. The plan…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-06-05 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the licensed nurses failed to develop a baseline care plan within 48 hours of admission and provide written copies of the baseline care plan summaries to two residents (Resident 14 and Resident 16) of three sampled residents.These failures decreased the facility's potential to effectively communicate resident needs among facility staff to promote a continuity of care and prevent adverse events from occurring right after admission.Findings:A review of Resident 14's admission record indicated admission to the facility on 5/14/26. This document also indicated Resident 14 was her own Responsible Party (RP, able to make decisions for herself).A review of Resident 14's Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool) dated 5/20/26 indicated Resident 14 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 which meant she had no cognitive (mental processes like memory, learning, concentration, or decision-making) impairment. ).A review of Resident 14's baseline care plan provided…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-06-05 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the nursing staff failed to assess, prevent, and identify the occurrence of pressure injury for one resident (Resident 3) of three sampled residents, when Resident 3 obtained a facility-acquired pressure injury (localized, pressure-related damage to the skin and/or underlying tissue usually over a bony prominence) on her left cheek.This failure had the potential for the facility acquired Stage 2 pressure injury (a partial-thickness loss of skin, presenting as a shallow open sore or wound) to worsen and placed Resident 3 at risk of complications including infection and pain. Cross Reference F658, F835Findings:A review of Resident 3's admission record indicated she was admitted to the facility in February 2021 with the diagnosis of long-term use of anticoagulants (medication used to prevent blood clots from forming or getting larger), protein-calorie malnutrition (an inadequate intake of protein or calories), rosacea (a chronic inflammatory skin condition which…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-06-05 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the licensed nurses failed to ensure expired and discontinued prescription medication were properly stored and disposed of when:Discontinued medications were observed overflowing from a large, uncovered cardboard box in front of shelves of prescription medications and medical supplies; and,Easily accessible undestroyed medication pills were found in a pharmaceutical waste container.These failures reduced the licensed nurses' ability to safely administer medication and decreased the facility's potential to prevent prescription drug diversion (the illegal redirection of prescription or controlled medication from their intended medical use to unauthorized or illicit use). Cross Reference F835Findings:During a concurrent interview with the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) and observation of the medication room on [DATE] at 8:42 a.m., the following were noted:An uncovered, cardboard box measuring 15 inches high by 16 inches wide by 25 inches long was overflowing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-06-05 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the licensed nurses failed to ensure expired medication was properly stored when expired multivitamins and pain medication were not removed from one of two medication carts.This failure reduced the facility's ability to ensure administered medications are safe and effective.Findings:During a concurrent observation of the East medication cart and interview on [DATE] at 11:16 a.m. with Licensed Nurse 3 (LN 3), LN 3 confirmed the cart contained:One bottle of calcium 600 milligram (mg) with Vitamin D, expired on 6/26;One bottle of Daily Vite(R) multivitamin, expired on 5/26; and,Four acetaminophen 650 mg suppositories, expired on [DATE].LN 3 confirmed the medications were expired and removed them from the medication cart.During an interview with the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) on [DATE] at 4:38 p.m., the ADON stated licensed nurses were expected to check the expiration dates of medication prior their administration. The ADON stated licensed nurses should…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-06-05 · tag F0813 — isolated
    Have a policy regarding use and storage of foods brought to residents by family and other visitors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store food in a safe and sanitary manner in the resident refrigerator for a census of 24 when food was found unlabeled and undated. This failure decreased the facility's potential to prevent foodborne illnesses in a vulnerable resident population.Findings:In an observation of the resident refrigerator with the Dietary Manger (DM) on 6/3/26 at 4:07 p.m., a bowl with a half-eaten burrito in it and bottles of drinks and supplements were found unlabeled with a resident name to identify whose food it was and undated to identify when it was placed in the refrigerator and when it was expected to be discarded. The DM stated the items were likely a resident's who treated the resident refrigerator as her own personal refrigerator. The DM stated it was not good to have the items in the resident refrigerator unlabeled and undated.A review of the facility's policy titled, Food Brought in by an Outside Source Policy, dated 4/11/23, indicated, All food or beverages brought in from the outside will be labeled with the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-26 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to treat one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) with kindness, respect, and dignity, when the Director of Nursing (DON) was witnessed bullying Resident 1. This failure resulted in Resident 1 crying.During an interview on 3/24/26 at 2:19 p.m., Confidential Witness (CW) stated that back in January 2026 something happened during activities that caused Resident 1 to get mad at someone. CW stated that while CW was at the nurses station that afternoon, Resident 1 was in the lobby when DON came at the nurses station very emotional and aggressive and said Resident 1 was out of control and we need to do something about her, we need to send her out. CW stated DON was very physically and verbally aggressive about the way she approached the nurses at the desk, all within earshot of Resident 1, who was only a few feet away. CW stated that when Resident 1 heard DON talking about her in this way, she began sobbing. CW stated it felt immediately like DON was bullying Resident 1. CW stated Resident 1 was sent later that day to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-26 · tag F0552 — isolated
    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to inform the family member of one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) of changes to Resident 1's treatment plan for her behaviors and her pain. This failure resulted in Resident 1's family member (FM) finding out after the changes to the treatment plan had already been implemented, feeling that Resident 1 was being over-medicated with sedating drugs, and having to request further changes to Resident 1's medication regimen.During an interview on 3/11/26 at 1:28 p.m., Family Member (FM) stated he got a call in February 2026 that Resident 1 was in respiratory distress due to an increase in her fentanyl patch (a powerful synthetic opioid, 50 to 100 times more potent than morphine, that is absorbed through the skin for consistent pain relief) dose. FM stated that if facility staff had asked him he would not have agreed to the 50 mcg/hr (micrograms per hour, the rate the drug is released from the patch) fentanyl patch because Resident 1 was already on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-26 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
    Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to protect one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) from chemical restraint when Resident 1 had a physician order for an antipsychotic drug (mood altering drugs- used to treat symptoms like hallucinations, delusions, and paranoia) to be given as needed (PRN) for longer than 14 days without a re-evaluation for continued need. This failure resulted in Resident 1 having the potential to receive a dose of the antipsychotic when the drug continued to remain an active order for seven weeks.During an observation on 3/12/26 at 11:50 a.m., a musician in the common room adjacent to the lobby sang into a microphone and played an electric guitar. Resident 1 was in the lobby in her wheelchair with her eyes closed and her chin resting on her chest.During an observation on 3/12/26 at 12:22 p.m., Resident 1 was in the lobby in her wheelchair with her eyes closed and her tongue hanging out of her mouth, her chin resting on her chest.During a medical record…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-12 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow its abuse prevention policy and procedures when one of one sampled resident (Resident 1) reported an incident of alleged physical abuse by staff, but the facility had no evidence it conducted an investigation nor reported the results of the investigation to the State Department of Health (the Department) within 5 working days. This failure had the potential to delay the Department ' s independent investigation of the incident. Findings: Review of Resident 1 ' s nurse's progress note, dated 10/29/2024 at 10:15 p.m., indicated, Resident [1] stated to the LN [licensed nurse] the CNA [certified nursing assistant] from last time [10/28/24] pulled on her arms and gave her a 2.5cm x 2 cm discoloration to her left hand near thumb . During a concurrent interview and record review on 2/12/25 at 3:20 p.m., with Medical Record Staff (Staff D), Resident 1's electronic medical record was reviewed. Staff D stated Resident 1's medical record contained a nurse's note dated 10/29/24 at 10:15 p.m. documenting the alleged…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-04-26 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the sanitization, safety, and functional environment in the kitchen when the temperature of the final rinse of the dishwasher was not maintained to adequately sanitize dinnerware and cooking utensils. This failure can potentially result to food contamination and outbreak of foodborne illness among residents of the facility. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 4/23/24, at 10:02 AM, the final rinse of the high temperature dishwasher was 150 degrees Fahrenheit. Dietary Aide E stated the dishwasher is not holding the final rinse temperature of 180 degrees Fahrenheit. During an interview on 4/24/24, at 5:19 PM, Dietary Aide F when asked about the final rinse temperature of the high temperature dishwasher stated, the dishwasher does not always go up to 180 degrees Fahrenheit at final rinse. Dietary Aide F stated he runs the dishwasher several times to reach 180 degrees Fahrenheit before he continues dishwashig. During an interview on 4/25/24, at 10:45 AM, Dietary Aide E confirmed she…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-04-26 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and records review, the facility failed to: 1) ensure hand hygiene was practiced by six (6) of 15 sampled residents (Resident 3, Resident 16, Resident 9, Resident 22, Resident 1, Resident 24) before meals. This failure had the potential to cause the spread of infections to other residents and worsen their already compromised health or cause an outbreak; 2) conduct ongoing analysis of infection surveillance. This failure had the potential to result in the facility missing to identify trends in infection types and occurrence and not being able to detect where an infection came from or the presence of an increasing number of infection or an outbreak; 3) ensure physician's orders were being followed when one of 15 sampled residents (Resident 34), who was on oxygen, nasal cannula (a device that delivers extra oxygen through a tube and into your nose) and oxygen humidifier (plastic bottle filled with distilled water that adds moisture to the oxygen being delivered to prevent dryness of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-04-26 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — widespread
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and records review, the facility failed to consistently perform antibiotic stewardship. This failure had the potential to result to inappropriate or unnecessary antibiotic treatment, increase the risk of adverse events, development of antibiotic resistance, and worsen the already frail health condition of residents. Findings: During a concurrent interview and records review on 4/25/24, at 02:16 PM, the facility Infection Preventionist (IP) stated she had started working in the facility 3 weeks ago and had not seen the previous IP's folders except for the folder on Antibiotic Stewardship. A review of the contents of the folder indicated there were documentation on an antibiotic surveillance tracking form with residents' names who were treated with antibiotics for the months of 1/24 to 4/24 but none for the past months. During an interview on 4/26/24, at 9:40 AM, when asked where the IP documents were, the Director of Nursing (DON) stated Infection control, surveillance and monitoring, and antibiotic stewardship documents could not be located or may have been…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-04-26 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based upon observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to appropriately diagnose and treat a growth on the left side of Resident 29's nose for one out of one sample residents (Resident 29). This failure had the potential to cause an infection and create discomfort for ongoing growth on Resident 29's face. Findings: During a review of Resident 29's, admission Record dated, 6/20/2022, indicated Resident 29's had a history of dementia (a general term for the impaired ability to remember, think or make decisions that interferes with doing everyday activities) and dry eye syndrome of bilateral lacrimal glands (lacrimal gland doesn't make enough tears, causing the eyes to become dry, sometimes caused by age). During an observation on 4/22/24 at 12:25 p.m., Resident 29 was observed lying in bed, asleep with a large growth on the left side of her nose with three streaks of dried blood on her cheek. During an interview on 4/22/24 at 3:29 pm. with Unlicensed Staff A, Unlicensed Staff A indicated Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-04-26 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — pattern
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the RNA (restorative nursing assistant) program (assist the patient in performing tasks that restore or maintain physical function as directed by the established care plan) was being received per physician orders for one of 15 sample residents (Resident 33). This failure resulted in a disruption in treatment and had the potential for Resident 33 to have a decline in range of motion, strength and endurance, an increase in joint pain and depression, and an overall decrease in ADLs (Activities of Daily Living: activities related to personal care, which includes bathing or showering, dressing, getting in and out of bed or a chair, walking, using the toilet, and eating). Findings: A review of Resident 33's admission Record, indicated Resident 33 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with a diagnosis including cerebral infarction (stroke), major depression disorder, hemiplegia (paralysis on one side of the body), hearing loss, amongst…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-04-26 · tag F0808 — failed to follow doctor-ordered diets — pattern
    Ensure therapeutic diets are prescribed by the attending physician and may be delegated to a registered or licensed dietitian, to the extent allowed by State law.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to follow a process of ensuring resident meals were served with the appropriate dietary consistency when one of two staff (Licensed Staff L) was observed reviewing the meal tray cards but not reviewing the covered food for accuracy prior to the meal being served to residents. Findings: During an observation on 4/22/24 at 12:34 p.m., with Licensed Staff L who was reviewing the resident meal tray cards and then reviewing the dietary order in the electronic medical record. Licensed Staff L was observed instructing the Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) the appropriate texture for the tray, for example regular, pureed (food served with a pudding like texture, which is smooth and blended). Licensed Staff L was observed repeatedly checking the electronic medical record, waiting for the CNA staff to return and serve another tray. At one point, a CNA called out the resident's name and Licensed Staff L indicated the texture of the tray and CNA then delivered the tray to the resident. Licensed Staff L did not open the covered meals to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-04-26 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — pattern
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the safety, and functional environment in the kitchen when cracks and missing tiles on the kitchen floor were not repaired. This failure can cause trips and falls among the kitchen staff and cause dirt to build up on the floor attracting cockroaches and rodents. Findings: During initial tour of the kitchen on 4/22/24, at 9:20 AM, cracked tiled were noted on the floor in front of the entrance to the dry good storage. On continued observation on 4/22/24, at 10:06 AM, more cracks on the tiled floor and missing tiles were noted by the washing sinks, by the exit door to the back of the building, and by the entrance way to another dry good storage. During an interview on 4/23/24, at 10:09 AM, Certified Dietary Manager (DM) nodded in acknowledgement when told the cracks on the kitchen floor and missing tiles were findings of non-compliance to regulations. Review of the Food Code 2017 indicated: It is the standard of practice to ensure materials for indoor floor, wall, and ceiling surfaces under conditions of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-26 · tag F0730 — isolated
    Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to perform annual performance reviews on two out of three sampled Certified Nursing Assistants (CNA). These failures had the potential for unlicensed nursing staff to not have their skills assessed under the performance review and not have necessary training addressed in the performance review. Findings: During a concurrent interview on 4/26/24 at 10:54 a.m., with Director of Nursing (DON) and Director of Staff Development (DSD) (by telephone), DSD was asked about the process for completing annual reviews for certified nursing assistants. DSD indicated the annual performance reviews were behind and agreed that Unlicensed Staff P and Unlicensed Staff Q had outstanding annual performance reviews. DSD indicated that on a three day a week schedule, there were things which were behind for the facility. DSD indicated the process would be to complete them within the month of the employee's hire date and the facility was working on the current year of 2024 and indicated 2023 was not complete with performance reviews for all unlicensed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-12 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to send in their investigative report for one of one alleged abuse incident to the department, within 5 days from the incident. This failure to not finish the investigation and sending the report, could result in missed chance to improve the care and services provided by the facility and potentially avoid other instances of abuse and neglect. Findings: During a review of records on 9/12/23, the facilities Report of Suspected Dependent Adult/Elder Abuse dated 8/12/23 was reviewed. The report indicated an allegation of abuse by staff against a resident, occurring on 8/12/23. The 5-day investigation report was not available. The report had not been sent to the department. On 9/12/23 at 10 a.m., an on-site visit was conducted at the facility to investigate the allegation of abuse. During an interview on 9/12/23 at 10:15 a.m., Administrator stated he had investigated the incident, but indicated he had not formalized the report for the facilities records. Administrator stated he did not know he was required to send in an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-01-25 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — widespread
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on Observation Interview and Record Review: 1. The facility failed to ensure a comfortable environment when the facility did not maintain comfortable room temperature (standard room temperatures are to be from 68-81 degrees Fahrenheit) in 19 out of 24 rooms (Rm): (Rm 101, 102, 105, 106, 108, 109, 110, 112, 114, 115, 116, 117, 118, 120, 121, 123, 124, 125, and 126) when temperatures measured were from 60 to 67 degrees and multiple residents (Resident 14, Resident 17, Resident 23, Resident 26, Resident 40, and Resident 244) complained of being cold inside of their rooms. 2. The facility did not maintain comfortable resident room temperatures safely by using three space heaters in the west hallway, two space heaters in the east hallway, and a space heater in resident rooms: (Rm 101, 112, 114, 115, and 123), which had the potential of causing a fire resulting in injury or death. On 1/12/23 at 2:26 p.m., the Administrator was notified of substandard quality of care identified and the facility was on extended…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-01-25 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — widespread
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain safe water temperatures when the water temperatures in eight of 14 residents' bathroom sinks were too hot, one over 130 degrees Fahrenheit (° F). This failure could potentially result in vulnerable residents getting scalded or burned from hot water. Findings: During an observation on 1/9/23 at 10:27 a.m., the water from the faucet in the bathroom between rooms [ROOM NUMBERS] felt very hot to the touch. During an observation on 1/9/23 at 11:11 a.m., the water from the faucet in the bathroom between rooms [ROOM NUMBERS] felt very hot to the touch. During an interview on 1/9/23 at 11:41 a.m., Resident 17 stated that one of the two showers had fluctuating water temperatures that were so uncomfortable she refused to use that shower. During an observation on 1/9/23 at 3 p.m., the water from the faucet in one of the front public restrooms was scalding hot. During an observation on 1/9/23 at 3:41 p.m., Maintenance Supervisor checked the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-01-25 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — widespread
    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to install call lights that could be accessed by a resident lying on the floor in the bathroom or shower room. This could potentially result in a resident falling to the floor and unable to signal to staff that they need immediate assistance. Finding: During observations on 1/9/23 between 3:41 p.m. and 4:30 p.m., all resident bathrooms and showers were noted to have call lights with a red button and no cord or other device to activate the call system from the floor. During an observation on 1/9/23 at 4:45 p.m., room [ROOM NUMBER]'s bathroom call light was located on the wall right of the sink. If a resident fell to the floor while in the bathroom, the resident would not be able to reach the call light to call for assistance. During a concurrent observation and interview on 1/12/23 at 10:15 a.m., the large shower room had shower equipment and other equipment that prevented one from being able to reach the shower call light without moving the equipment. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-01-25 · tag F0623 — pattern
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to send a copy of Notice of Discharge or Transfer to the representative of the Office of the State Long-Term Care (LTC) Ombudsman [a public advocate is an official who is charged with representing the interests of the public by investigating and addressing complaints of maladministration or a violation of rights] for four out of six residents: Resident 13, who was transferred to an acute care facility and Resident 43, 247, and 249, who were discharged to home. This failure had the potential for Resident 43, 247, and 249 being inappropriately discharged and Resident 13, 43, 247, and 249 not being provided an advocate who could inform them of their rights and options before being discharge to home or transferred to the acute care facility. Findings: A review of Resident 13's Nurse's Progress Notes, dated 1/7/23, indicated Resident 13 was transferred to the Emergency Department (ED) because Resident 13 had started spiking a temperature (99.8 degrees), CBC…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-01-25 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — pattern
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to keep residents' pneumonia vaccines up to date when residents were not offered the 23-valent pneumonia vaccine, as recommended by the Centers for Disease and Prevention (CDC). This failure could potentially leave vulnerable residents unprotected from preventable lung infections that can lead to hospitalization or death. Finding: During an interview on 1/13/23 at 2:33 p.m., the Director of Nursing (DON) stated the immunization program was usually overseen by the Infection Preventionist (IP), Director of Staff Development (DSD), and nursing. DON stated the program was a work in progress since they had not had stable IP coverage. DON stated she had been doing her best to keep up. DON stated IP and DSD were presently going through resident records and creating a spreadsheet of resident vaccinations. DON stated the system for tracking resident vaccinations to ensure they were current was overseen by MDS Nurse. When asked which guidance the facility policy…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$48,355 in federal fines across 3 penalties. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

  • $13,065 — penalty dated 2026-06-05
  • $22,225 — penalty dated 2026-06-05
  • $13,065 — penalty dated 2026-03-26
  • Medicare payment denial — starting 2026-04-30 for 11 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
PINERS NURSING HOME INCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 07/01/1985
PINER, GARYIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 06/27/1985
PINER, JEREMYIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 11/25/2014
REEVES, DANEIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 01/14/2014

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$5.7M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-11.5%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$468K
Related-party expense7% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 30%Medicare 8%Other / private 62%

This home reported $468K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$447per resident / day
operating cost
$13,593per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$401per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in California
$12,167/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$15,178/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,000/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 555207. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-06-05, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next