Hillcrest Manor Sanitarium
1889 National City Blvd., National City, CA 91950 · For profit - Corporation · 98 certified beds · (619) 477-1176 Medicare & Medicaid certified
On the public record, this home looks stronger than most — but visit before you decide.
- a strong health-inspection score (4/5) — the hardest rating to game (though it’s ranked within its own state, not nationally)
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (33) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 4 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 3 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 4 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 4 to 5 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 13.8% | 10.2% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 3.4% | 4.0% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.8% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.4% | 1.2% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 9.2% | 7.3% | 6.5% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.4% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 3.8% | 1.6% | 3.3% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 22.0% | 9.8% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 50.8% | 13.7% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 98.2% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 0.0% | 4.3% | 4.7% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 3.5% | 10.2% | 21.2% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.70 | 2.25 | 1.67 | typical |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 0.52 | 1.57 | 1.80 | better |
* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 98 beds and averages 56.4 residents a day — about 58% occupied, or roughly 42 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.23 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.30 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.98 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.85 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.38 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.34 to 0.21 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
33 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 23 are one tap away and print in full.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-12 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — patternHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to staff a Registered Nurse (RN) for at least eight hours a day for 19 days from July 1, 2025, through September 30, 2025. This failure may have prevented residents from receiving advanced care or having their complex medical needs managed effectively. Findings: A review of the PBJ (Payroll-Based Journal) Staffing Date Report and CASPER Report 1705 D, which help Skilled Nursing Facilities identify areas for improvement, showed that in Quarter 4 of 2025 (July 1-September 30), the facility triggered a No RN hours alert. This indicated there were at least four days in the quarter without any RN hours. On 2/11/25 at 10:45 A.M., an observation of the current staffing was posted at the nurse's station.A review of the PBJ report indicated that on 7/3/25, 7/4/25, 7/8/25, 7/9/25, 7/10/25, 7/18/25, 7/28/25, 8/8/25, 8/29/25, 9/1/25, 9/17/25, 9/18/25, 9/21/25, 9/24/25, 9/25/25, 9/26/25, 9/28/25, 9/29/25, and 9/30/25, there was no RN hours. On 2/12/25 at 3:45 P.M., an interview was conducted with the Director of Nursing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-12 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to (1) check the consistency of the pureed (blended to a smooth and creamy consistency) foods for a resident and (2) ensure the beef patties were cooked according to the manufacturer's guidelines for 48 of 48 residents who received the beef patties. These failures could lead to food that was not palatable and texture that was not safe for a resident to consume. In addition, residents who consume the beef patties could contract food-borne illness.Findings: 1. On 2/11/26 at 11 A.M., an observation during a puree preparation and interview with [NAME] (CK) 1 was conducted. CK 1 poured water into the container of the blender, an amount not measured, and four scoops of thickener into the container of the blender. CK 1 stated they will be serving burgers with baked beans on the side, and she needed to puree the vegetables for one resident. The container was observed with shredded lettuce, diced tomatoes, diced onions, water, and thicker. CK 1 then covered the container and blended the items. CK 1 got a brown cup,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-12 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolatedPrevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of five sampled residents(Resident 40) reviewed for psychotropic (a drug or substance that affects how the brain works and causes changes in mood, awareness, thoughts, feelings, or behavior) medication had specific behavior monitoring in place for the use of antipsychotic (a class of drugs that treat symptoms of mental disorder by altering brain function). This failure had the potential to result in unnecessary use of psychotropic medication. Findings: Resident 40 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included schizoaffective disorder (a mental health condition characterized by a mix of mood problems and thinking problems), per the facility's admission Face Sheet. On 2/9/26 at 10:21 A.M., Resident 40 was observed walking in the hallway with a walker. A review of Resident 40's clinical record was conducted on 2/11/26. Per the Physician's Order, dated 1/25/26, the physician wrote an order to give haloperidol…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-12 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive resident-centered care plan were developed and interventions were implemented for three of 19 sampled residents (2, 1, 40) when:1. A care plan for an anticoagulant monitoring of side effect for Resident 2 was not developed.2. A care plan for dementia was not developed for Resident 1.3. A care plan for antipsychotic medications for Resident 40 was not developed. These failures had the potential for the residents not to receive care and services specific to the residents' needs.Findings: 1. A review of Resident 2's admission Record indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis that included unspecified atrial fibrillation (Afib- irregular, often fast, and chaotic heart rhythm). On 2/12/26 at 11:06 A.M., an interview and record review was conducted with the Infection Preventionist (IP). The IP reviewed Resident 2's medical records. The IP reviewed Resident 2's physician's order. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-12 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to assess a resident's respiratory status for one of 19 sampled residents (Resident 40). These failures had the potential to delay care and cause Resident 40's condition to worsen. Findings: Resident 40 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included schizoaffective disorder (a mental health condition characterized by a mix of mood problems and thinking problems), per the facility's admission Face Sheet. On 2/9/26 at 10:21 A.M., Resident 40 was observed walking in the hallway with a walker. Resident 40 stated I've been coughing, and that staff had not done anything about it. A review of Resident 40's clinical record was conducted on 2/11/26. Per the Physician's Order, dated 2/10/26, the physician wrote an order to give guaifenesin dextromethorphan (medication for cough) as needed for 10 days. A further review of Resident 40's clinical record was conducted. The Nurse's Notes, dated 2/9/26, contained the first documentation…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-12 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a smoking assessment was completed for one of nine residents (Resident 5).This failure had the potential for Resident 5 to be at risk for burns when smoking.Findings:A record review of Resident 5's admission Record indicated Resident 5 was admitted on [DATE] with a diagnosis which included paranoid schizophrenia (intense, irrational delusions and auditory hallucinations) and syncope (fainting or passing out). On 2/10/26 at 4 P.M. an observation and interview was conducted with the Patio Monitor (PM) in the smoking area. The PM stated resident s who smoke were at risk for burns. The PM stated all residents were required to have a smoking assessment before they could go out to the smoking area to smoke. On 2/12/26 at 11:13 A.M., an interview and record review was conducted with the Infection Preventionist (IP). The IP reviewed Resident 5 medical records which indicated Resident 5 was a smoker. The IP stated there was no smoking assessment…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-12 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to identify and respond to unplanned significant (noticeable) weight loss for one of two sampled residents (Resident 33) who experienced unplanned weight loss. This failure could affect their health and well-being.Findings: Resident 33 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included paranoid schizophrenia (a mental health condition that affects the way a person thinks, feels, and behaves) per the admission Face Sheet. Per Resident 's Care Plan Report, dated 8/30/25, indicated Resident 33 had altered nutrition less than body requirements related to meal refusals and had a potential for dehydration. The goal was for Resident 33 to avoid further weight loss, tolerate the prescribed diet without additional loss, and not exhibit any signs or symptoms of dehydration. Resident 33's goal weight range (GWR) was 170 to 185 pounds. The Interventions included honoring food and fluid preferences and referring Resident 33 to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-12 · tag F0712 — isolatedEnsure that the resident and his/her doctor meet face-to-face at all required visits.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the physician completed the initial visit in a timely manner for one of 19 sampled residents (Resident 40). These failures had the potential to compromise the quality and safety of resident care.Findings: Resident 40 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included schizoaffective disorder (a mental health condition characterized by a mix of mood problems and thinking problems), per the facility's admission Face Sheet. On 2/9/26 at 10:21 A.M., Resident 40 was observed walking in the hallway with a walker. Resident 40 stated I've been coughing, and that staff had not done anything about it. A review of Resident 40's clinical record was conducted on 2/11/26. Per the History and Physical, dated 1/9/26, the Physician Assistant (PA) saw Resident 40. On 2/12/26 at 9:05 A.M., a joint interview and record review was conducted with the Director of Nursing (DON). The DON stated the physician (PA) alternates visits with the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-12 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one out of one sampled resident (Residents 2) was free of unnecessary medications when Resident 2 received an anticoagulant (blood thinner) medication without staff monitoring for signs and symptoms of side effects.This deficiency had the potential to cause harm due to lack of monitoring for negative side effects of anticoagulant therapy, including excessive bleeding or bruising.Findings:A review of Resident 2's admission Record indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis that included unspecified atrial fibrillation (Afib- irregular, often fast, and chaotic heart rhythm). On 2/12/26 at 11:30 A.M., an interview and record review was conducted with the Infection Preventionist (IP). The IP reviewed Resident 2's physician's order. Physician's order indicated, Eliquis 5 milligrams (mg) one tablet by mouth twice a day for afib. The IP stated there was no documentation for monitoring the negative side effects of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-12 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure the medication storage room was free of expired Tuberculin PPD (purified protein derivative) testing solution (used in a skin test to help diagnose tuberculosis infection). This failure had the potential for testing solutions and/or medications to be ineffective and could have had inaccurate results.Findings: On [DATE] at 9:55 A.M., an observation and interview was conducted with Licensed Nurse (LN) 1. LN 1 reviewed Tuberculin PPD, 5 units per 0.1 ml (milliliters) solution had an open date of [DATE]. LN 1 reviewed the manufactures guidelines that indicated, .vials in use more than 30 days should be discarded due to possible oxidation and degradation which may affect potency. LN 1 stated the vial had been open for more than 30 days and should have been discarded. On [DATE] at 11:15 A.M., an interview was conducted with the Infection Preventionist (IP). The IP stated once the Tuberculin PPD solution, it was valid for 30 days and should not be used…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 23 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-15 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the building was secured to prevent the elopement (leaving the facility without permission) of one resident (Resident 1).As a result, Resident 1 eloped from the facility and was at risk for physical injury and psychosocial harm.Findings:A Facility Reported Incident (FRI) was received by the California Department of Public Health on 9/9/25. The FRI reported that Resident 1 was missing from the facility.Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include schizophrenia (a long-term mental disorder), per the admission Face Sheet.A telephone interview with the Administrator (Admin) was conducted on 9/11/25 at 5:15 P.M. Per the Admin, Resident 1 had eloped from the facility in the early morning of 9/9/25. The Admin stated a window screen was found to be loose in a room leading to an outdoor storage area, and a light outline of a shoe print was observed by staff on 9/9/25 following the incident. The Admin stated the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-21 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — patternHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to staff a Registered Nurse (RN) for at least 8 hours a day for twelve days from April 1 - June 30, 2024. This failure had the potential to prevent residents from receiving the care they needed. Findings: Review of PBJ (Payroll-Based Journal) Staffing Data Report, CASPER Report 1705 (a report that can help Skilled Nursing Facilities identify areas for improvement in care and operations) for Quarter 3 2024 (April 1 - June 30) indicated that No RN hours was triggered for twelve days. On 11/20/24 at 9:30 A.M., an observation of current staffing was observed posted at nurse's station. Staffing was within normal limits. On 11/20/24 at 9:57 A.M., a concurrent interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) and record review of PBJ Staffing Data Report, CASPER Report 1705 for Quarter 3 2024 (April 1 - June 30) was conducted during the Sufficient and Competent Staffing Facility Task. The DON indicated from her records the following days did not have a RN scheduled for at 8 least hours: 4/11/24, 4/16/24, 4/18/2, 04/22/25,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-11-21 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — patternEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the staff followed policy and procedure for one of 14 sampled residents (Resident 22) when: 1) the staff did not document the medication administration accurately and 2) the staff did not document the medication administration in a timely manner. As a result, there was a potential the residents did not receive the prescribed amount of medication. Findings: Resident 22 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included schizophrenia (a type of mental health illness) per the facility's admission Face Sheet. 1) A review of records was conducted. The physician order dated, 6/20/24 indicated, Resident 22 was to receive eight units of insulin (a medication to control blood sugar) three times a day. The MAR indicated, LN 2 and LN 3 gave Resident 22 six units of insulin on 11/16/24, 11/17/24 and 11/18/24. On 11/20/24 at 10:09 A.M., an interview with the DON was conducted. The DON stated LN 2 informed her that LN 2 knew the physician…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-11-21 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview the facility failed to ensure that the facility's water system was tested for Legionella (an infectious bacteria that flourishes in air conditioning and water systems that causes a flu like symptoms). This failure had the potential for residents to become infected with Legionella via contaminated water sources. Findings: On 11/21/24 at 10 A.M., during the Infection Control task, an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) was conducted. The DON stated that she was unaware if the facility was testing the facility's water for Legionella, but that the Administrator (ADM) would know. The DON stated that it was important to test for Legionella to prevent resident infection from Legionella. On 11/21/24 at 10:46 A.M., an interview with the Maintenance Supervisor (MS) was conducted. The MS stated he did not test the water for Legionella or any other bacteria. The MS stated he only tested the water temperature. The MS stated that he was not sure if the ADM was having a company come to test the water. The MS stated that it was important to test the water to prevent…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-02-15 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to implement an emergency plan for food preparation when the kitchen ceiling had water damage. This failure had the potential for contamination of food for 57 residents. Findings: On 1/23/24, at 6:15 P.M., a concurrent observation was conducted with a Dietary Aide (DA 1) of the dining area. Several residents were in the dining room, some leaving the area. DA 1 stated the residents had just finished eating dinner. DA 1 stated the food preparation was done in the kitchen, but there was no leaking while the food was being prepared. On 1/23/24 at 6:25 P.M., the facility kitchen was toured with the Facility Owner (FO). Several areas of water damage were noted on the kitchen ceiling, including over the stove. Two holes were observed in the ceiling, one over dumbwater area, and one on far left side of the kitchen hood. Some areas noted to have small black circles about the size of a quarter. Pictures were taken. On 1/23/24, at 7:56 P.M., the Dietary Supervisor (DS) was interviewed. DS stated the kitchen had been used to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-12 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — patternHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a registered nurse (RN) on duty, 8 consecutive hours per day, seven days per week for 33 days out of 91 days from April 2023 thru June 2023. This failure had the potential for more advanced care activities provided by an RN to be unavailable to the residents. Findings: During the initial tour of the facility on 10/09/2023 at 9 A.M., the only RN at the facility was the Director of Nursing (DON). A review of the facility's PBJ (payroll based journal) Staffing Data Report, CASPER report 1705D, FY (fiscal year) Quarter 3, indicated, .triggered: four or more days within the quarter with no RN hours . Further review of the facility's staffing data report indicated: .Infraction dates: 04/01 (SA); 04/02 (SU); 04/08 (SA); 04/09 (SU); 04/13 (TH); 04/15 (SA); 04/16 (SU); 04/22 (SA); 04/23 (SU); 04/25 (TU); 04/28 (FR); 04/29 (SA); 05/02 (TU); 05/06 (SA); 05/07 (SU); 05/12 (FR); 05/13 (SA); 05/20 (SA); 05/21 (SU); 05/22 (MO); 05/27 (SA); 05/28 (SU); 05/29 (MO); 06/03 (SA); 06/04 (SU); 06/08 (TH); 06/10 (SA); 06/11…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-10-12 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — patternProvide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the kitchen staff carried out the tasks of the food and nutrition services department in accordance with the standard of practice for the following kitchen competencies: 1. Kitchen staff did not know how to calibrate food thermometers. 2. Kitchen staff did not know the quaternary ammonium concentration of the kitchen sanitizer buckets. 3. A kitchen dishwasher did not know how to correctly test PPM (parts per million) concentration of the dishwashing solution with the chlorine test strip. These failures had the potential to expose 59 residents who consumed food from the kitchen, to acquire a foodborne illness. Findings: 1. On 10/10/23 at 1:44 P.M., an observation and interview with the [NAME] 6 (CK 6) was conducted. The CK 6 stated the thermometer calibration was done every Saturday and Monday in the morning by the cook. CK 6 proceeded to place two (2) thermometers into a plastic cup with ice and no water; one thermometer read 32 degrees Fahrenheit (F) and the other thermometer read 88 F. degrees. CK 6…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-12 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to clarify a POLST (Physicians Order for Life Sustaining Treatment), for one of three residents (Resident 5), reviewed for Resident Rights. As a result, in the event of a cardiac arrest, staff had the potential to be confused with the current documentation and might not honor the resident's wishes. Findings: Resident 5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included paranoid schizophrenia (a severe mental health condition which involves delusions and hallucinations), per the facility's admission Face Sheet. On 10/9/23, Resident 5's clinical record was reviewed. Taped on the outside of the paper chart were the letters DNR (Do not resuscitate). The physician orders dated 6/7/12, indicated the resident was a DNR. The pink POLST form, dated 8/22/22, listed the resident as a Full Code signed by the physician (8/22/22) and listed the conservator's office as the responsible party (RP). An interview was conducted with CNA 1 on 10/10/23 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-12 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain clean shower curtains for two of six resident bathrooms (Annex's male and female restrooms), reviewed for Resident Rights and Homelike Environment. As a result, there was the potential for residents to feel less valued and to have a low self-esteem. Findings: During initial tour of the Annex building on 10/9/23 at 9:10 A.M., the men's and women's bathrooms were inspected for cleanliness. The two separate bathrooms contained a shower and two commodes. Three plastic shower curtains were present, one for the shower area and one each for toiletry area for privacy. The men's three interior plastic curtains were observed with black mold-like matter and areas with smeared brown substances. The two women's interior plastic commode privacy curtains had smears of dried brown, tan, and yellow substances. An observation and interview was conducted with CNA 2 on 10/10/23 at 10:11 A.M., of the two Annex bathrooms. CNA 2 inspected the interior plastic curtains in both the men's and women's bathrooms. CNA 1 stated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-12 · tag F0637 — isolatedAssess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to report an unplanned discharge to CMS (Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services) for one of one resident (Resident 43), via the significant change of condition Minimum Data Set (MDS), reviewed for Resident Assessment. As a result, CMS was unaware Resident 43 had been admitted to the hospital on [DATE], and had not returned to the facility. Findings: Resident 43 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included alcohol abuse with alcohol-induced mood disorder (depressive disorder), per the facility's admission Face Sheet. An interview and record review was conducted with the MDSN on 10/10/23 at 2:58 P.M. The MDSN stated Resident 43's last MDS report sent to CMS was a quarterly report on 4/28/23. The MDSN stated Resident 43 was discharged to the hospital on 7/3/23, due to shortness of breath. The MDSN stated Resident 43's return was expected, however he never returned. The MDSN stated a Discharge MDS report was never completed or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-12 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to accurately assess and report a fall, with a 6-month look back period to CMS (Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services) via a quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set), for one of one resident (Resident 16), reviewed for Falls. As a result, CMS was not informed of Resident 16's current medical status. Findings: Resident 16 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included bipolar disorder (a mental condition causing severe mood swings), per the facility's admission Face Sheet. An observation and interview was conducted with Resident 16 during initial tour on 10/09/23 at 8:55 A.M. Resident 16 was lying in bed and stated she fell down some stairs a few weeks ago and injured her foot. Resident 16's clinical record was reviewed on 10/10/23. According to the nurses note, dated 6/20/2023, Resident 16 fell after missing some steps and complained of pain in her right ankle. A fall care plan was initiated for the fall on 6/20/23, with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-12 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop a person-centered care plan related to the use of a shoe lift for one of three residents (Resident 19 ), reviewed for Limited Range of Motion (ROM). As a result, there was the potential for Resident 19 to be at risk for impaired mobility and for the staff to not consistently assess Resident 19 for risks associated with impaired mobility. Findings: Resident 19 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included dementia (type of memory loss), traumatic brain injury, history of traumatic fracture, per the facility's admission Face Sheet. On 10/09/23 at 9:55 A.M., an observation was conducted with Resident 19. Resident 19 was observed wearing a shoe lift on his right foot. On 10/11/23 Resident 19's clinical record was reviewed. Per the physician order dated 2/7/22, the order indicated .refer to [name] orthotic/prosthetic clinic for shoe lift [right] foot, [right] leg [is less than left leg status post history] of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-12 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a residents' low air loss (LAL-a mattress that alternates pressure points) mattress was set appropriately, and resident repositioned and documented for 1 of 1 resident (Resident 26) reviewed for Services/Treatment to Prevent Pressure Ulcers. This failure had the potential for Resident 26 to develop pressure ulcers. Findings: Resident 26 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnosis which included Schizophrenia (a mental condition affecting the mind) and Parkinson's Disease (a progressive disease affecting the nervous system), per the facility's admission Face Sheet. On 10/9/23 at 11:52 A.M., and at 2:02 P.M., an observation of Resident 26 was conducted. Resident 26 was in bed laying with the head of the bed at 15 degrees. A special mattress (LAL) was observed on Resident 26's bed with the following settings noted: 400 lbs (pounds) static at normal pressure. On 10/10/23 at 7:53 A.M., and at 10:14 A.M., an observation of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-12 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure antipsychotic (major tranquilizer used when the resident may harm himself or others) PRN (as needed) medications were limited to the 14 day use, for one of five residents (54), reviewed for unnecessary use of a psychotropic medication. As a result, Resident 54 had the potential to be exposed to unnecessary side effects and harm of the medications. Findings: 1. Resident 54 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with a diagnoses to include schizoaffective disorder (a mental illness with impaired thoughts and mood swings) and obsessive-compulsive disorder (a mental illness with unwanted thoughts and fears), per the facility's admission Face Sheet On 10/11/23, Resident 54's records were reviewed. Per the physician's orders, dated 10/08/21, Thorazine (treats mood swings) 50 mg by mouth every 12 hours as needed for severe agitation. Per the physician's orders, dated 11/04/21, Haldol (treats mood disorder) 10 mg by mouth every 8 hours as…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-12 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the medication error rate was less than five percent. The facility's medication error rate was 6.45%. Two medication errors were observed out of 31 opportunities, during the medication administration process for two of four randomly observed residents (Resident 19, 52). As a result, the facility could not ensure medications were correctly administered to all residents. Findings: 1. On 10/10/23 at 8:38 A.M., an observation of medications administration was conducted with LN 11. LN 11 prepared and administered seven medications to Resident 52. One of the seven medications was Advair diskus (breathing treatment in disk-shaped) which was at counter 42, prior to administration. On 10/10/23 a medication reconciliation for Resident 52 was conducted. Per the physician order, dated 4/22/21 listed Advair diskus 50/100 one puff inhaler two times a day. On 10/10/23 at 9:55 A.M., an observation and interview was conducted with LN 11. LN 11 administered medications to Resident 52, including a dose of Advair diskus…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-12 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to: 1. Secure one of two medications carts (North cart), reviewed for Medication Storage, and 2. To consistently monitor one of one medication room (north nurses station) for temperature control. As a result, there was the potential for residents and staff to have access to unauthorized medications, and there was a potential for medications were stored to ensure their integrity. Findings: 1. An observation was conducted of the charting room on 10/10/23 at 2:01 P.M. The charting door was propped wide open and unlocked. Inside the charting room was a red medication cart labeled North. The medication cart was unlocked, and no staff were nearby. The top left drawer of the medication cart contained packaged syringes and needles. On the right side of the medication cart, the second drawer down was packaged medications, which had resident names on them. Staff and one resident were observed walking past the unlocked charting room on 10/10/23 at 2:03 P.M. A male resident was observed past the opened charting room and the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-12 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolatedProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure proper food storage was met, when expired food was found in one of three refrigerators (Refrigerator 2), during initial Kitchen Tour. This failure has the potential to result in harmful bacteria growth and cross contamination, which could lead to foodborne illnesses to residents within the facility. Findings: On 10/9/23 at 8:23 A.M., a concurrent observation and interview was conducted with the [NAME] 7 (CK 7) of the kitchen refrigerator. On a shelf of the refrigerator were four plastic bags containing heads of romaine lettuce. One lettuce bag was opened on a bottom corner with one head of lettuce missing. The lettuce bag was open to the air and was labeled with a black marker, opened date of 10/6 and BB (Best By) 10/8. CK 7 stated he did not know what, BB meant. CK 7 stated the opened lettuce bag was not good and could be contaminated, so it needed to be thrown away. CK 7 further stated the opened bag of lettuce should not be used because the bag had not been secured and sealed. On 10/09/23 at 10:11…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2026-02-12 · tag F0911 — patternEnsure resident rooms hold no more than 4 residents; for new construction after November 28, 2016, rooms hold no more than 2 residents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure five of 25 resident rooms (Rooms SWD 1, SWD 2, SWD 3, SWD 4, and room [ROOM NUMBER]) accommodated no more than four residents. This failure had the potential to limit the freedom of movement for the residents that occupied those rooms, which may place them at risk for injury.Findings:During initial tour on 2/9/26, five of the 25 resident rooms accommodated more than four residents:a. Room SWD 1- 5 Residentsb. Room SWD 2- 5 Residentsc. Room SWD 3- 5 Residentsd. Room SWD 4- 5 Residentse. room [ROOM NUMBER]- 5 ResidentsDuring the course of the survey, those rooms did not impose any safety hazards. There were no complaints about space or room issues from the residents occupying these rooms. There were no quality of care or quality of life concerns identified that negatively affected the residents residing in those rooms.The survey team recommends the approval of the written room waiver continuum request, dated 2/12/26, for the rooms…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2026-02-12 · tag F0912 — patternProvide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a minimum of 80 square feet (sq. ft.- unit of measurement) of livable space per resident for four of 25 resident rooms. This failure had the potential to affect the resident's health and safety and prevent the residents from maintaining their highest level of well-being by limiting the movements of those residents in their rooms.Findings: During initial tour, dated 2/9/26, four of the 25 residents' room were observed to be less than 80 sq. ft. per resident. The residents' rooms and their measurements of livable space were noted as follows:a. Room SWD 1 (5 beds) measured: 385.5 sq. ft. (77.1 sq. ft. per resident)b. Room SWD 2 (5 beds) measured: 391.3 sq. ft. (78.2 sq. ft. per resident)c. Room SWD 3 (5 beds) measured: 394.5 sq. ft. (78.9 sq. ft. per resident)d. Room SWD 4 (5 beds) measured: 390.2 sq. ft. (78 sq. ft. per resident) These four rooms were not crowded and did not impose any safety hazards. There were no complaints about space or room issues from the residents occupying these rooms. During an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2024-11-21 · tag F0911 — patternEnsure resident rooms hold no more than 4 residents; for new construction after November 28, 2016, rooms hold no more than 2 residents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure five of 25 resident rooms (Rooms SWD 1, SWD 2, SWD 3, SWD 4, and room [ROOM NUMBER]) accommodated no more than four residents. This failure had the potential to limit the freedom of movement for the residents that occupied those rooms, which may place them at risk for injury. Findings: During initial tour on 11/18/24, five of the 25 resident rooms accommodated more than four residents: a. Room SWD 1- 5 Residents b. Room SWD 2- 5 Residents c. Room SWD 3- 5 Residents d. Room SWD 4- 5 Residents e. room [ROOM NUMBER]- 5 Residents During the course of the survey, those rooms did not impose any safety hazards. There were no complaints of space or room issues from the residents occupying these rooms. There were no quality of care or quality of life concerns identified that negatively affected the residents residing in those rooms. The survey team recommends the approval of the written room waiver continuum request, dated 11/18/24, for the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2024-11-21 · tag F0912 — patternProvide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a minimum of 80 square feet (sq. ft.- unit of measurement) of livable space per resident for four of 25 resident rooms. This failure had the potential to affect the resident's health and safety, and prevent the residents from maintaining their highest level of well-being by limiting the movements of those residents in their rooms. Findings: During initial tour, dated 11/18/24, four of the 25 resident rooms were observed to be less than 80 sq. ft. per resident. The residents' rooms and their measurements of livable space were noted as follows: a. Room SWD 1 (5 beds) measured: 385.5 sq. ft. (77.1 sq. ft. per resident) b. Room SWD 2 (5 beds) measured: 391.3 sq. ft. (78.2 sq. ft. per resident) c. Room SWD 3 (5 beds) measured: 394.5 sq. ft. (78.9 sq. ft. per resident) d. Room SWD 4 (5 beds) measured: 390.2 sq. ft. (78 sq. ft. per resident) These four rooms were not crowded and did not impose any safety hazards. There were no complaints of space or room issues from the residents occupying these rooms.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2023-10-12 · tag F0911 — patternEnsure resident rooms hold no more than 4 residents; for new construction after November 28, 2016, rooms hold no more than 2 residents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure five of 25 resident rooms (Rooms SWD 1, SWD 2, SWD 3, SWD 4, and room [ROOM NUMBER]) accommodated no more than four residents. This failure had the potential to limit the freedom of movement for the residents that occupied those rooms, which may place them at risk for injury. Findings: During initial tour on 10/9/23, five of the 25 resident rooms accommodated more than four residents: a. Room SWD 1- 5 Residents b. Room SWD 2- 5 Residents c. Room SWD 3- 5 Residents d. Room SWD 4- 5 Residents e. room [ROOM NUMBER]- 5 Residents During the course of the survey, those rooms did not impose any safety hazards. There were no complaints of space or room issues from the residents occupying these rooms. There were no quality of care or quality of life concerns identified that negatively affected the residents residing in those rooms. The survey team recommends the approval of the written room waiver continuum request, dated 10/9/23, for the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2023-10-12 · tag F0912 — patternProvide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a minimum of 80 square feet (sq. ft.- unit of measurement) of livable space per resident for four of 25 resident rooms. This failure had the potential to affect the resident's health and safety, and prevent the residents from maintaining their highest level of well-being by limiting the movements of those residents in their rooms. Findings: During initial tour, dated 10/9/23, four of the 25 resident rooms were observed to be less than 80 sq. ft. per resident. The residents' rooms and their measurements of livable space were noted as follows: a. Room SWD 1 (5 beds) measured: 385.5 sq. ft. (77.1 sq. ft. per resident) b. Room SWD 2 (5 beds) measured: 391.3 sq. ft. (78.2 sq. ft. per resident) c. Room SWD 3 (5 beds) measured: 394.5 sq. ft. (78.9 sq. ft. per resident) d. Room SWD 4 (5 beds) measured: 390.2 sq. ft. (78 sq. ft. per resident) These four rooms were not crowded and did not impose any safety hazards. There were no complaints of space or room issues from the residents occupying these rooms. During…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| ESTACIO, MARIA CARMINA | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE | since 05/07/2008 |
The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
What families pay in CA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 055975. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-02-12, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.