Community Memorial Continuing Care Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

62.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 83 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 53.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 52 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.22 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 28% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 58% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy at close to weekday levels right through the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 75 beds and averages 71.9 residents a day — about 96% occupied, or roughly 3 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 5.23 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.58 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.01 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.86 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.38 on weekdays — 10% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.73 to 1.22 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 27% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

15 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 5 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-16 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure food items stored in the refrigerators were clearly labeled and dated to support safe storage practices when:Multiple perishable food items had unclear or incomplete date stamps, preventing staff from determining the appropriate use-by/discard timeframe.A perishable sandwich containing meat and cheese was stored without a label identifying the contents/type of the sandwich. These failures had the potential for residents to consume expired or contaminated food and increase the risk of allergen exposure due to unidentified ingredients, placing residents at risk for foodborne illness and allergic reactions.During an observation and concurrent interview on 1/13/25 at 9:37 a.m. with the Director of Food and Nutrition Services (DFNS) in the facility kitchen's walk-in refrigerator, the following food items were observed, diced watermelon in a 2-ounce (oz) clear plastic container with lid, sour cream in a 2-oz clear plastic container with…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-16 · tag F0710 — isolated
  Obtain a doctor's order to admit a resident and ensure the resident is under a doctor's care.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a physicians order was obtained for urinary catheter change and care for one of 18 sampled residents (Resident 1).This failure resulted in Resident 1 receiving care without a physician's order.During a review of Resident 1's Face Sheet (FS), dated 1/15/26, the FS indicated, Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of encephalopathy (any type of disorder, disease or damage that affects your brain's function or structure).During a concurrent interview and record review on 1/15/26 at 3 p.m. with the Minimum Data Set Coordinator (MDSC), Resident 1's urethral catheter assessments and nursing progress notes were reviewed. The review indicated, the urinary catheter was changed on 12/22/25 and 1/10/26, and the urinary catheter was reinserted on 1/14/26. Review of Resident 1's Physician orders, indicated, no evidence of a physician order for urinary catheter change or care. MDSC stated that there should be a physician order for…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-16 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
  Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow its Policy and Protocol (P&P) for 1 of 18 sampled residents (Resident 18) by not ensuring physician review and documented response to the consultant pharmacist's Medication Regimen Review (MRR - a comprehensive, mandatory evaluation of a resident's medication regimen performed by a licensed pharmacist to promote positive outcomes, minimize adverse consequences, and ensure safety) for lorazepam (anti-anxiety medication) regimen when:This failure had the potential to result in Resident 18's continued use of an unnecessary drug (a medication given without a clear ongoing need or proper monitoring and/or adverse medication-related outcomes (harmful side effects)) without appropriate physician oversight and clinical rationale (a documented medical reason for the decision).During a review of Resident 18's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated, Resident 18 is a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including: Anxiety…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-16 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to properly label food items for their received, opened and expiration dates before storage. This failure had the potential to cause food borne illnesses to the residents. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 1/13/25 at 10:25 AM, with the Director for Food and Nutrition Services (DFNS), the following food items were found to be unlabeled/undated as to when they were received, opened or when they will expire: one bag of partially opened green beans unlabeled/undated; one bag of blueberries in zip lock bag, unlabeled/undated; one bag of six hamburger patties unlabeled/undated; two bags of turkey sealed unlabeled/undated, one bag of beef sealed unlabeled and undated. The DFNS validated the finding. During a review of the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Receiving, the P&P indicated in part, J. Date foods prior to placing in storage areas; K. Produce is labeled with the date received

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-11-30 · tag F0839 — isolated
  Employ staff that are licensed, certified, or registered in accordance with state laws.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a Certified Nursing Assistants (CNA 1) certification was valid prior to their start of and duration of employment at the facility. These failures had the potential to negatively impact patient care. Findings: During an interview on [DATE] at 9:45 a.m. with Director of Nursing (DON), DON stated, The process is that the manager will receive a one month notice from Human Resources when a staff's license/certification will expire and then we talk to the employee and go from there. We never received anything from Human Resources indicating to not go forward. During a concurrent interview and record review on [DATE] at 10:35 a.m. with [NAME] President of Human Services (VPHS), CNA 1's Personnel File, [undated] was reviewed. The Personnel File indicated, CNA 1 was hired [DATE], as a full time CNA. When CNA 1 applied for the position on [DATE], her certification submitted with her employment application was current and due to expire [DATE]. VPHS stated,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-08-16 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to make sure the assessment accurately reflects the resident's status fo one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) in the Minimum Data Set (MDS) ( A standardized tool used to assess and plan care of residents in Medicare or Medicaid certified facility) on admission for the following: 1. Hearing status 2. Medication received 3. Skin condition This facility failure had the potential to result in poor quality care. Findings: 1. During a review of Resident 1 ' s History & Physical (H&P) on 7/7/23 at 2:22 p.m, dated 6/8/23, the H&P indicated, Resident 1 was deaf, blind in one eye and with diagnosis of chronic pain syndrome. During a continued review of Resident 1's Care Plan (a plan developed to meet resident care) dated, 6/9/23, the Care Plan revealed, Resident 1 was deaf to both left and right ears and with impaired communication secondary diagnosi of dysphagia (swallowing difficulties) and a white board was used for communication. During a review on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-08-16 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure one of three sampled residents (Resident 1), had a doctor' s treatment order for an ongoing right ankle stage 2 (a shallow opening on the skin with red or pink wound bed) pressure injury with accurate documentation of Resident 1's skin condition upon discharge. This failure had the potential to delay treatment and cause Resident 1 to not recieve accurate care. Findings: During a review of Resident 1' s History & Physical (H&P) on 7/11/23 at 3:12 p.m, dated 6/8/23 indicated,Resident 1 was a [AGE] year-old male who was hospitalized due to dysarthria (difficult or unclear speech) and dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), and with diagnosis of deaf and blind in one eye. During a review of Resident 1's Braden Skin Summary Risk Score (tool to assess risk of skin complications) dated 6/8/23, the Braden Skin Summary Risk Score indicated, a score of 11 (score of 14 or less indicates at risk status for pressure ulcer development.). During a review of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-08-03 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure an account of all controlled drugs in order to minimize loss or diversion of narcotics when narcotic return bin(s) were not emptied on a daily basis. This failure resulted in one tablet of tramadol (narcotic pain medication) 50 mg (milligram, unit of measure) not being accounted for and had the potential for narcotics to be diverted from the facility. Findings: On 6/20/23 the facility reported to the Department a loss of one tramadol 50 mg tablet. The report indicated, on 4/25/23, at 4:13 a.m., Licensed Nurse (LN 1) documented returning one tramadol 50 mg tablet to the facility's Nursing Station 3's (NS 3) external Pyxis (automated system that automates the distribution, management and storage of medications) return bin. The tramadol tablet was not found in the return bin when it was emptied on 6/6/23 by pharmacy technicians. During an interview on 6/28/23 at 10:30 a.m. with Director of Nursing (DON), DON confirmed the missing tramadol 50 mg tablet was unaccounted for and stated the tramadol should have been in the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2023-04-21 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — pattern
  Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the privacy of protected health information (PHI-is any information in the medical record or designated record set that can be used to identify an individual and that was created, used, or disclosed while providing a health care service such as diagnosis or treatment.) for twenty two of sixty three residents residing in the facility. This facility failure resulted in twenty two residents protected health information potenitally being compromised. Findings: During an observation on 04/18/23 at 1:10 p.m., a four wheeled rolling cart outside of room [ROOM NUMBER] was observed unattended with a laptop computer on it. The computer screen was open. The screen displayed the PHI of twenty-two residents including their name, diagnosis, room number, account number, physician name, isolation precautions (isolation precautions are used to reduce transmission of microorganisms in healthcare and residential settings. These measures are designed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-04-21 · tag F0557 — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff safeguarded the personal property of one of eighteen sampled residents (Resident 56). When a topical gel cream called Liniment Gel (a topical gel used to temporary relief of muscle or joint pain) that was mailed to the resident in the facility was taken away by a facility staff member and never replaced nor reimbursed. This failure resulted in a resident not having the right to retain and use a personal possession in the facility. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 04/18/23 at 3:22 p.m., in residents' room, when asked if any issues or concerns regarding facility, Resident 56 stated his sister mailed some cream for pain to facility. As he was opening the box a female staff took the medication and stated, you can't have this here. Resident 56 asked surveyor if facility should reimburse for it. Resident 56 stated They took it. It is very expensive. I haven't had no surgery but both knees have pain, used for that. During a concurrent interview and record review with Social Service Worker…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 29 rows in the source record cover these 22 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

What families pay in CA