Chapman Global Medical Center D/P SNF
2601 East Chapman Avenue, Orange, CA 92869 · For profit - Corporation · 27 certified beds · (714) 633-0011 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home’s record is mixed — some reassuring signs, some worth asking about.
- a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
- lower-than-typical staff turnover (21% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0604) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (59) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 3 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 4 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 3 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 3 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 3 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 5 to 4 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 1.0% | 4.0% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 1.7% | 0.8% | 0.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 6.2% | 1.2% | 2.0% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 0.0% | 7.3% | 6.5% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 3.1% | 0.4% | 0.1% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 0.0% | 1.6% | 3.3% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 4.1% | 13.7% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 98.2% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 17.1% | 4.3% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 0.0% | 10.2% | 21.2% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 6.4% | 12.0% | 17.1% | better |
* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 27 beds and averages 24.7 residents a day — about 91% occupied, or roughly 2 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 8.45 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.97 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.53 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 8.31 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 8.50 on weekdays — 2% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.97 to 0.96 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 21% is below the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
59 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 49 are one tap away and print in full.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-09 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and facility's P&P review, the facility failed to provide a homelike, clean and comfortable environment for five of ten residents rooms. * The facility failed to ensure Resident 8's room was free with water mark discoloration in the ceiling. In addition, the facility failed to ensure the window blinds for rooms [ROOM NUMBER] were not missing panels. * The facility failed to ensure Resident 9's privacy curtains were well maintained and not off the hook. * The facility failed to ensure Resident 23's GT feeding pole stand was clean and free from brownish, dirt like particles. * The facility failed to ensure the window blinds for room [ROOM NUMBER] were not missing panels. These failures had the potential for the residents to not have a clean, comfortable, homelike environment and could negatively affect the residents' well-being.Findings: Review of the facility's Infection Prevention 2026 Annual Plan: 2026 Strategies to Minimize, Reduce and Eliminate Infection…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-04-09 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — patternEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, facility document review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure three of five licensed nurses (LVNs 7, 8, and 10) demonstrated the competencies needed to provide safe nursing care. * LVNs 7, 8, and 10 failed to disconnect the residents from the GT extension tubing when the residents' GT feeding reached the formula dose limit or after the feeding formula was completed. These failures had the potential to put the residents at risk for enteral feeding care not provided in a safe and competent manner.Findings Review of the facility's P&P titled Enteral Feeding revised 12/2020 showed to review the order for feedings such as formula, dose limit, rate, and number of hours for infusion per physician orders. In addition, to check the GT placement by auscultating air and to check feeding residual by aspirating stomach content. Lastly, to discontinue the tube feeding when volume dose limit was reached. Review of the facility's document titled Call Lights, Feeding…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-09 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, facility document review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to provide the necessary pharmacy services for five of 12 final sampled residents (Residents 3, 12, 13, 20 and 21), five nonsampled residents (Residents 5, 9, 10, 16, and 18) and for three of seven medication carts (Medication Carts A, C, and D) to ensure proper storage and labeling of the medications. * Medication Cart A had multiple colored stains, dust and rust-like particles. Additionally, there were expired wound supplies and culture and sensitivity tests. * Medication Cart C had internal and external medications stored together in the same drawer. Additionally, Resident 3's Lantus medication was expired. * Medication Cart D had rust on the mid-base of the first drawer. * The facility failed to ensure Resident 3, 5, 9, 10,12, 13 16, 18, 20, and 21's opened bottle of normal saline solution was discarded after 24 hours. * The facility failed to ensure Resident 20's vitamin E topical cream (a potent…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-09 · tag F0813 — patternHave a policy regarding use and storage of foods brought to residents by family and other visitors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure safe food handling of the food brought for the residents from outside sources. * The facility failed to ensure the facility staff members who handled the outside food demonstrated competency on safe food handling procedures. This failure posed the risk of food contamination which could lead to food borne illness for three residents who consumed food by mouth. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Food from an Outside Source dated 2/2000 showed the guidelines for storing food in the nursing units included to label all containers with the resident's name, medical record number, and date. The food will be discarded within 48 hours unless the manufacturer's expiration date was present. On 4/8/26 at 1522 hours, an interview was conducted with RN 1. RN 1 was asked to explain the process when the visitors would bring food for the residents from outside sources. RN 1 stated the facility staff members would educate the resident and their visitors regarding the facility's policy, then the facility staff members…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-09 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, medical record review, facility document review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to implement the infection control practices designed to provide the safe and sanitary environment and help prevent the development and transmission of diseases and infections. * The facility failed to implement the infection control surveillance program for the months of October 2025 through March 2026. The facility conducted surveillance of the residents infections only when the residents were prescribed an antimicrobial medications and/or if the residents were diagnosed with an infection. * The facility failed to determine whether the residents who exhibited signs and symptoms of infection and were not prescribed antimicrobial medications, or had not been diagnosed with an infection, met the facility's criteria for infection (utilizing McGeer's Criteria). In addition, the facility failed to include these residents in the facility's infection control surveillance program. These failures posed the risk of not identifying residents' infections and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-09 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and medical record review, the facility failed to ensure the dignity was maintained for one of 12 final sampled residents (Resident 6) and one nonsampled resident (Resident 14). * The facility failed to ensure Resident 6's and 14's indwelling urinary catheter drainage bag was covered. This failure had the potential to affect the residents' well-being.Findings: 1. On 4/6/26 at 0903 hours and 4/7/26 at 0924 hours, Resident 6 was observed in bed with the indwelling urinary catheter drainage bag at the side of the bed uncovered. Medical record review for Resident 6 was initiated on 4/7/26. Resident 6 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident 6's MDS assessment dated [DATE], showed Resident 6 had severe cognitive impairment and needed total assistance from the staff on all ADL care. On 4/07/2026 at 1326 hours, an observation and concurrent interview for Resident 6 was conducted with CNA 2. CNA 2 stated Resident 6 had an indwelling urinary catheter and she would empty…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-09 · tag F0552 — isolatedEnsure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review, and facility's P&P review, the facility failed to ensure one of five residents (Resident 7) reviewed for the unnecessary medications was free from the unnecessary psychoactive medications. * The facility failed to ensure an informed consent was completed prior to Resident 7's use of valproic acid (mood stabilizer) as manifested by angry outburst and duloxetine (antidepressant) medications. These failures had the potential for the resident to receive unnecessary medications and negatively affect the resident's health.Findings Review of the facility's P&P titled Psychoactive/Chemical Restraint dated 3/2026 showed the residents will receive psychoactive medications only when they are necessary to treat medical, mood, behavioral or psychiatric symptom. To obtain informed consent from resident's rep if resident lacks decisional capacity. Review of the facility's P&P titled Informed Consent dated 3/2026 showed all the residents medical records must contain a properly executed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-09 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolatedKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, facility document review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure privacy was provided during care to one of 12 final sampled residents (Resident 12) and two nonsampled residents (Residents 9 and 23). * The facility failed to ensure the privacy curtains were fully closed during the medication administration to Resident 9. * The facility failed to ensure the privacy curtains were fully closed during the tracheostomy care and suctioning to Residents 12 and 23. These failures had the potential to negatively affect the dignity of the residents and violate the residents' rights to privacy.Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Resident Privacy and Confidentiality dated 3/2026 showed to always use curtains to provide full visual privacy when caring for the resident. 1. Medical record review for Resident 9 was initiated on 4/6/26. Resident 9 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident 9's H&P examination dated 9/26/25, showed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-09 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, facility document review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to provide the necessary services to attain or maintain the highest practicable well-being for one of 12 final sampled residents (Resident 2). * The facility failed to ensure Resident 2's injection sites were rotated for the administration of the Lovenox (blood thinner medication) and insulin medications. This failure had the risk for lipodystrophy (buildup of fatty lumps) and decreased the medication absorption.Findings: According to Taylor's Clinical Nursing Skills seventh edition, the various sites used for subcutaneous injections (injections given in the fatty tissue, just under the skin) are the outer aspect of the upper arm, the abdomen (from below the costal margin to the iliac crest), the anterior aspect of the thigh, the upper back, and the upper ventral (front upper) or dorsogluteal area (buttocks). It is necessary to rotate sites or areas for injection to prevent buildup of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-09 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the necessary care and services were provided to prevent the risk and development of pressure injuries for two of 24 (Residents 2 and 20) residents in the facility. * The facility failed to ensure Resident 2's low air loss mattress setting was accurate and failed to obtain a physician's order for the low air loss mattress setting. * The facility failed to ensure Resident 20's low air loss mattress setting was accurate per the physician's order. These failures placed Residents 2 and 20 at risk for the development or worsening of pressure injuries. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Pressure Ulcer Prevention, Management Protocol and Treatment revised 10/2021 showed prevention techniques for pressure injuries included providing the resident a low air loss mattress and to follow the manufacturer's recommendations for the pump settings. Review of the facility's P&P titled Low Air Loss Mattress…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 49 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-09 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation, and medical record review, the facility failed to provide the appropriate restorative care and services for one of 12 final sampled residents (Resident 24). * The facility failed to provide a left soft hand roll to Resident 24 as per the physician's orders. This failure posed a risk for Resident 24 to have decreased range of motion and mobility.Findings: On 4/6/26 at 0940 hours, 4/7/26 at 0933 hours, and 4/9/26 0801 hours, Resident 24 was observed lying in bed wearing a PRAFO on her left ankle and a splint on her right hand. Resident 24's left hand was in a fist position. Medical record review for Resident 24 was initiated on 4/6/26. Resident 24 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident 24's MDS assessment dated [DATE], showed Resident 24's cognitive skills for daily decision making were severely impaired. Resident 24 had diagnoses such as cerebral palsy (a disorder that affected a person's movement and posture), quadriplegia (paralysis affecting all four limbs),…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-09 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, facility document review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to provide the necessary care and services to prevent accidents for one of 12 final sampled residents (Resident 4). * The facility failed to ensure Resident 4's upper side rail pads were in place as per physician's order for safety/seizure precautions. This failure had the potential to put the resident at risk for serious injuries.Findings: Review of the facility's P&P tilted Seizure Precaution dated 4/2026 showed the facility ensure the safety of residents who had diagnosis of seizures by providing side rails padded with anti-trauma pads. On 4/6/26 at 1117 hours and 4/7/26 at 0801 hours, Resident 4 was observed in bed with both upper side rails elevated and no pads were in place. Medical record review for Resident 4 was initiated on 4/6/26. Resident 4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident 4's MDS assessment dated [DATE], showed Resident 4 had moderate cognitive…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-09 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to provide the appropriate care and services for the use of an indwelling urinary catheter for one of three final sampled residents (Resident 3) reviewed for indwelling urinary catheter care. * The facility failed to ensure Resident 3's indwelling urinary catheter had no sediments in the tubing. In addition, the facility failed to notify the clinician when Resident 3 had sediments in the indwelling urinary catheter. These failures had the potential for Resident 3 to develop complications associated with the use of indwelling urinary catheter.Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Urinary Catheter Management revised 11/2020 showed guidelines for the residents with indwelling urinary catheters that included to observe urinary drainage for cloudiness, odor, mucus, blood or sediment, and to report any abnormal findings. On 4/7/26 at 1308 hours, Resident 3 was observed to have an indwelling urinary catheter…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-09 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to provide the appropriate care and services for the use of the GT (Gastrostomy Tube) for two of 21 residents (Residents 3 and 20) with GT feedings. * The facility failed to ensure Resident 3's GT extension feeding tube was disconnected after their tube feeding formula was completed. * The facility failed to ensure Resident 20's GT extension feeding tube was disconnected after their tube feeding formula was completed. These failures posed the risk of tube clogging, leaking, not functioning properly, and for developing bacterial growth (infection) for Residents 3 and 20.Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Enteral Feeding revised 12/2020 showed to review the order for feedings such as formula, dose limit, rate, and number of hours for infusion per physician orders. In addition, to check the GT placement by auscultating air and to check feeding residual by aspirating stomach content. Lastly, to discontinue…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-09 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure appropriate pain management was provided for one of five final sampled residents (Resident 3) reviewed for unnecessary medications. * The facility failed to assess Resident 3's pain prior to the administration of morphine (pain medication). In addition, the facility failed to reassess Resident 3's pain after the administration of morphine. These failures had the potential to put the resident at risk for ineffective pain management and adverse effects related to the use of unnecessary pain medication.Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Pain Management Plan dated 1/2002 showed the purpose of the pain management plan was to provide guidelines for the appropriate assessment and management of pain for all the residents. If a resident was unable to self-report the pain scale from 0-10 using the [NAME] scale, the Objective Pain Scale for Cognitively or Communicatively Impaired Adults and Children More than Three…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-09 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, facility document review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to provide the necessary pharmaceutical services to two of 12 final sampled residents (Residents 2 and 7). * The facility failed to monitor for adverse effects for Resident 2's anticoagulant medication and failed to obtain a physician's order to monitor the anticoagulant medication use. * There was no evidence nonpharmacological interventions were ordered, performed and documented for Resident 7's use of psychoactive medications. These failures had the potential to result in unnecessary use of, ineffective and/or lack of monitoring or interventions for psychotropic and anticoagulant medications that could negatively affect the residents highest practicable mental, physical, and psychosocial well-being.Findings: 1. Review of the facility's P&P titled Psychoactive Medications/ Chemical Restraint dated 3/2026 showed residents will receive psychoactive medications only when they are…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-09 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the medical record was accurate for one of 12 final sampled residents (Resident 3). * The facility failed to ensure the physician's orders for Resident 3's code status was accurate. Resident 3's code status showed full code status; however, Resident 3's POLST showed she was a DNR status. In addition, the facility failed to ensure the physician's order for precautions for Resident 3 was accurate. A contact precaution was ordered; however, Resident 3 no longer needed contact precautions. These failures had the potential for the residents' care needs not met as the medical record was inaccurate.Findings: Medical record review for Resident 3 was initiated on 4/6/26. Resident 3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident 3's Patient Orders showed the following physician's orders:- dated 5/30/25, for a full code status;- dated 1/24/26, for an enhanced barrier precaution for C. Auris; and- dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-03 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and medical record review, the facility failed to provide necessary care and services to ensure the residents maintained their highest physical well-being for five of five sampled residents (Residents 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5). * Resident 1 had fracture of the right upper arm. There was no monitoring for pain, redness, swelling and warmth of extremities. * The facility failed to follow the physician's order for PT and OT treatment for Resident 1 and OT treatment for Resident 4. * The facility failed to follow the physician's order for daily RNA services for Residents 1, 2, 3, and 5. These failures had the potential for delayed medical interventions and could negatively impact the residents well-being.Findings: 1. Medical record review for Resident 1 was initiated on 10/1/25. Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident 1's MDS assessment dated [DATE], showed a BIMS score of 00 (severe cognitive impairment). Review of Resident 1's Care Plans initiated 7/28/25, showed the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-02 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review, facility document review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to provide the necessary respiratory care and services for two of two sampled residents (Residents 1 and 2) who were dependent on the ventilator with tracheostomy for breathing. * The facility failed to ensure Resident 1's ventilator circuit was effectively monitored. As a result, the resident experienced the respiratory arrest. * The facility failed to ensure the P&Ps for respiratory care and services were followed for Resident 2 when the oxygen therapy and a part of the disposable ventilator circuit was replaced and rinsed by a non-qualified personnel. These failures posed the risk of delayed care and interventions for the residents. Findings: 1. Review of the facility's P&P titled Subacute Ventilator Management reviewed [DATE] showed to establish a mutual understanding and a standard of ventilator management for Nursing staff and Respiratory Therapists, which work as a team to provide quality…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-13 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and medical record review, the facility failed to provide the necessary care and services to promote healing of the pressure injuries for one of two final sampled residents (Resident 18) reviewed for pressure injuries. * The facility failed to ensure Resident 18's air mattress was set at the alternate mode (setting where mattress inflates and deflates with air cyclically to redistribute pressure on the body) as ordered by the physician. This failure had the potential to inhibit the pressure injury healing. Findings: Medical record review for Resident 18 was initiated on 2/10/25. Resident 18 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident 18's Interventional Wound Care Management Progress Note dated 2/5/25, showed Resident 18 had several wounds which included a Stage 3 pressure injury to the sacrum and Stage 4 pressure injuries to the left and right hips and right ankle. On 2/12/25 at 0830 hours, an observation and concurrent interview was conducted with LVN 4. Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-13 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, facility document review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure two of two final sampled residents (Residents 9 and 11) reviewed for RNA services received the RNA services as ordered. * The facility failed to ensure Residents 9 and 11 received the RNA services daily as ordered by the physician. This failure had the potential for the residents to have a decline in ROM function, which could lead to worsening of contractures or muscle weakness. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Restorative Nursing Program revised 11/2021 showed for the RNA to ensure that all the residents are assessed on admission and ongoing for their restorative/rehabilitative needs and abilities. All the residents will be assessed by rehabilitative services within 48 hours of admission and ongoing for their restorative/rehabilitative needs and abilities. A plan of care will be developed specifically designed to promote and improve functional levels and enhance the quality of life. The RNA program…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-13 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, facility document review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to provide the necessary care and services to prevent accidents for three of 12 final sampled residents (Residents 12, 13, and 21). * The facility failed to ensure the low air loss mattress pump of Residents 13 and 21 was placed in a safe area as per the manufacturer's recommendation. * The facility failed to implement the floor mats to both sides of Resident 12's bed for safety, in accordance with the physician's order. These failures put the residents at high risk of serious injury. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Pressure Ulcer Prevention, Management Protocol and Treatment dated 10/2024 showed the residents will be assessed for pressure ulcer to prevent the occurrence and/or progression of a pressure ulcer. The interventions for prevention of pressure ulcer includes the use of pressure relief/low air loss mattress/egg crate/overlay. 1. Review of Resident 13's low air…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-13 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the appropriate care and services for the use of GT were provided for two of 12 final sampled residents (Residents 3 and 13). * The facility failed to ensure Resident 3's HOB was elevated at a 30 degree angle or higher when Resident 3 was receiving the enteral feeding via GT. * The facility failed to ensure Resident 13's HOB was elevated at a 30 degree angle or higher when Resident 13 was receiving the enteral feeding via GT. These failures posed the risk for complications related to use of the GT for Residents 3 and 13. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Enteral Feeding dated 10/2024 showed during the enteral feeding, keep the resident's head of the bed at a 30 to 45 degree angle as per the physician's order. 1. Medical record review for Resident 3 was initiated on 2/12/25. Resident 3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. On 2/10/25 at 0923 hours, and 2/12/25 at 0835 hours, Resident 3 was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-13 · tag F0694 — isolatedProvide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and medical record review, the facility failed to provide the necessary care and services to maintain the intravenous accesses for one of 12 final sampled residents (Resident 21). * The facility failed to obtain a physician's order for the care and maintenance of the IV access and develop a plan of care for Resident 21's IV access to the lower extremity. These failures had the potential to delay identification of intravenous access to lower extremity related complications for the resident. Findings: On 2/10/25 at 0929 hours, Resident 21 was observed in bed with an IVF infusing at 70 ml per hour via IV machine. Resident 21's IV access was unable to locate due to the cover in bed. Medical record review for Resident 21 was initiated on 2/11/25. Resident 21 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident 21's MDS dated [DATE], showed Resident 21 had moderately impaired cognitive skills. On 2/11/25 at 1533 hours, an observation and concurrent interview was conducted with RN…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-13 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to dispose the unused medication in accordance with the facility's P&P. * LVN 4 disposed Resident 18's unused half tablet fludrocortisone (corticosteroid medication) in a sharps container (container used for the disposal of sharp medical equipment) instead of the pharmaceutical waste container as per the facility's P&P. This failure posed the risk for improper management of pharmaceutical waste. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Pharmaceutical Waste dated 10/2022 showed the pharmaceutical waste includes all the unusable medications. All unusable pharmaceutical waste shall be disposed of in the pharmaceutical waste containers (white with blue lids) including the partially used medications including tablets. Medical record review for Resident 18 was initiated on 2/10/25. Resident 18 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident 18's the physician's order dated 10/25/23, showed an order to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-13 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the Pharmacy Consultant's recommendations from the MRR were acted upon for one of five final sampled residents (Resident 13) reviewed for the unnecessary medications. * The Pharmacy Consultant's recommendation to discontinue the chlorhexidine (antiseptic medication) and perform a hemoglobin A1c level (a blood test that measures the average blood sugar level over the past two or three months) for Resident 13 were not acted upon. These failures had the potential to put the residents at risk for adverse consequences related to the medications. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Skilled Nursing Facility - Drug Regimen Review dated 09/2022 showed the pharmacist review the drug regimen of the resident monthly and make appropriate recommendations. The pharmacist will report in writing the irregularities in the dispensing and administration of drugs and other matters relating to the review of the drug regimen to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-13 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the medication error rate was below 5%. The facility's medication error rate was 8%. * The facility failed to administer Resident 18's lactulose (laxative) and clonidine (antihypertensive) medications as ordered by the physician. These failures had the potential to negatively affect the resident's health. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Medication Administration revised 7/2013 showed prior to administering a medication, the healthcare professional shall: verify that the medication selected for the administration is correct based on the medication order and product label. Review of the facility's P&P titled Medication Administration Schedule revised 5/2023 showed a scheduled medication maybe administered 30 minutes before or after the scheduled time. Actual time of medication administration must be documented on the Medication Administration Record. Medical record review for Resident 18 was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-13 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and facility P&P review, the facility failed to provide the necessary pharmacy services to ensure the proper storage, labeling and disposal of the medications for two of four medication carts (Medication Carts A and B). This failure posed the risk for the occurrence of errors in medication administration. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Medication Storage and Security, Pharmacy Manual dated 9/2023, under the Policy section, showed all the medications shall be stored in appropriately segregated and secure conditions to minimize the potential for medication errors and theft or diversion. The external use medications in liquid, tablet, capsule, or powder form shall be segregated from the medications intended for internal use. The aerosol products shall be stored separately from other topical products. 1. On 2/11/25 at 1155 hours, an observation of Medication Cart A and concurrent interview was conducted with LVN 5. The following was observed: - inside the first drawer, one bottle of loperamide liquid ( medication to treat loose bowel…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-13 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolatedProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, facility P&P review, and facility document review, the facility failed to ensure the food safety and sanitary requirements were met in the kitchen. * The facility failed to ensure the food preparation utensils and equipment were in good, sanitary, and cleanable working conditions. * The facility failed to ensure the staff's personal food items were not placed in the kitchen refrigerator. * The facility failed to ensure the kitchen staff wore hair restraint. These failures had the potential to cause foodborne illnesses to the medically vulnerable resident population who consumed food prepared in the kitchen. Findings: Review of the facility's census on 2/10/25, showed two of 23 residents received food prepared from the facility's kitchen. 1. According to the USDA Food Code 2022, Section 4-601.11, Equipment, Food-Contact Surfaces, Nonfood-Contact Surfaces, and Utensils: (A) Equipment food-contact surfaces and utensils shall be clean to sight and touch. (B) The food-contact surfaces of cooking equipment and pans shall be kept free of encrusted grease…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-13 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — isolatedConduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and facility document review, the facility failed to ensure the Facility Assessment addressed or included the following: 1. Active involvement of required individuals in developing the Facility Assessment; 2. Resources necessary to care for residents including weekends; 3. Include a plan to maximize recruitment and retention of direct care staff; and 4. Include a contingency plan for staffing needs. This failure had the potential to not meet the residents' care needs if the assessed population's needs and resources were not comprehensively identified and addressed. Findings: According to the CMS QSO-24-13-NH dated 6/18/24, with an implementation date of 8/8/24, CMS issued a revised guidance for long-term care facility assessment requirement. The Facility Assessment should address and includes the active involvement of direct care staff in developing the Facility Assessment. Also includes the staffing resources necessary to care for the residents, including the weekends; a plan to maximize…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-13 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the appropriate infection control practices were implemented. * The facility's infection control committee did not meet for one quarter in 2024 to discuss infection control within the subacute unit. This failure posed the risk for transmission of diseases-causing microorganisms and resulted in the committee not being able to discuss quarterly infection control statistics within the subacute unit. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Medical Staff Bylaws, undated, showed the Medical Executive/Quality Improvement Committee shall meet as often as necessary, but at least quarterly and shall maintain a record of its proceedings and actions. On 2/12/25 at 1337 hours, a concurrent interview and document review was conducted with the Director of Infection Prevention/Acting IP. Review of the Infection Control Pharmacy and Therapeutics meeting logs showed no quarterly meeting was held after 8/20/24. When asked about the last infection control committee meeting, the Director of Infection…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-13 · tag F0882 — isolatedDesignate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and facility document review, facility failed to have a full-time, dedicated IP. This failure had the potential for the Infection Prevention and Control Program not being implemented without proper oversight. Findings: Review of the Organizational Chart of the facility updated February 2025 showed the position for Infection Control Supervisor/Infection control was vacant. Review of the QSO-22-19 dated 6/29/22, showed the SNFs are required to have an IP who has specialized training onsite at least part-time to effectively oversee the facility's infection prevention and control program. On 2/12/25 at 1105 hours, an interview was conducted with the Director of Infection Prevention/Acting IP. The Director of Infection Prevention/Acting IP stated she was being stationed and stayed most of the time at the acute care unit of the facility. The Director of Infection Prevention/Acting IP stated she was currently helping the facility on their infection control and would stay in the building for only one to two hours including her work in the acute unit of the facility. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-25 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the RNA services were provided as ordered to one of three sampled residents (Resident 3) to prevent a decline in the ROM functions. * The facility failed to follow a physician's order for the RNA to apply the bilateral hand splints, bilateral PRAFOs the to lower extremities, and provide the ROM exercises daily to Resident 3. This failure had the potential for Resident 3 to sustain a decline in the ROM functions, which could lead to the worsening of contractures and muscle atrophy. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Restorative Nursing Program (RNA) reviewed August 2023 showed the RNA program is provided seven days a week based on the resident's individual needs and delivered per the physician's order. On 9/25/24 at 1500 hours, a concurrent observation and interview was conducted with Resident 3. Resident 3 was observed lying in bed with both hands contracted and hand rolls in place. Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-15 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure nine of 12 final sampled residents (Residents 3, 7, 11, 12, 13, 15, 19, 20, and 23) remained free from accident hazards. * The facility failed to ensure the residents' side rail paddings were properly placed as ordered by the physicians and residents' care plans for Residents 3, 7, 11, 12, 13, 15, 19, and 20. * The facility failed to ensure an informed consent was obtained, conduct an assessment, and implement the least restrictive measures prior to utilizing the enclosed bed (Posey Bed - a hospital bed with canopy and mattress designed to help provide a safe, controlled environment for residents at extreme risk of injury from a fall. It is a restraint and must be prescribed by a licensed physician) for Resident 23. In addition, the facility failed to ensure the monitoring of the device was documented. These failures had the potential risk for injury to the residents. Findings: Review of the facility's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-15 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolatedEnsure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure one of 12 final sampled residents (Resident 7) was free from the physical restraints. * The facility failed to conduct an assessment and implement the least restrictive measures prior to applying a mitten (mitten which look like boxing gloves with a Velcro or tie at the wrist to hold them in place and immobilize the resident's fingers) to Resident 7's left hand. In addition, the facility failed to obtained the physician's order and informed consent from the responsible party. These failures posed the risk of compromising the residents' independence and psychosocial well-being. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Restraints dated 11/2021 showed the restraints will be used only with a written order from a physician, ensure the least possible discomfort to the resident, and informed consent was obtained. All restraints use is documented in the care plan, nurse's notes, and reviewed by the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-15 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the baseline care plan for one of 12 final sampled residents (Resident 8) and one nonsampled resident (Resident 9). * The facility failed to develop a care plan problem for Resident 9's use of adaptive device (a beige colored velcro strap that was used to assist in holding utensils during meal times). * The facility failed to develop a care plan problem to address the use of peripheral IV (peripheral intravenous access for IV fluids and/or medications) for Resident 8. These failures posed the risk of not providing the appropriate, consistent, and individualized care to the residents. Findings: 1. Review of the facility's P&P titled Care Planning revised 8/2010 showed the resident care plan will be maintained as part of resident health, will identify the problems or needs. After information has been gathered, the data is analyzed to determine what problems and needs exist. On 2/12/24 at 1148 hours,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-15 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to provide the necessary care and services to ensure one of 12 final sampled residents (Resident 7) attained and maintained their highest practicable well-being. * The facility failed to ensure Resident 7 was provided with the heel protectors while in bed as per the physician's order and resident's care plan. This failure had the potential for the resident to not receive appropriate care and treatment to prevent a skin problem. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Pressure Ulcer Prevention, Management Protocol and Treatment with a revised date of 10/21 showed the prevention of pressure ulcer techniques included the protection on all bony prominences, application of heel protectors, reposition the resident every two hours, and keep the skin clean and dry. On 2/12/24 at 0926 hours, and 2/13/24 at 0851 hours, Resident 7 was observed in bed and no heel protector in place on both feet. Medical record review…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-15 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and facility P&P, the facility failed to ensure the necessary care and services were provided to prevent the development of new pressure injuries and promote the healing of the existing pressure injuries for two of 12 final sampled residents (Residents 8 and 12). * The facility failed to ensure the LAL mattress setting was consistent with Resident 8's weight and the service light on the LAL mattress unit was addressed; and failed to ensure Resident 8 was administered wound treatments as per the physician's orders. These failures put Resident 8 at higher risk for developing new pressure injuries and worsening of the existing pressure injury on the left buttock. * The facility failed to ensure the LAL mattress setting was appropriate for Resident 12's weight. This failure posed the risk for Resident 12 to not benefit from the therapy provided by the LAL mattress. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titles Pressure Ulcer Prevention, Management Protocol and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-15 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and medical record review, the facility failed to ensure the residents with limited ROM functions consistently received the treatments and services. * All 23 residents with orders for RNA services (including the ROM exercises and application of splints) did not consistently receive their treatments on multiple occasions. This failure had the potential for the residents to develop further decrease in ROM functions. Findings: On 2/13/24, the facility census was 23. On 2/14/24, while conducting the sufficient staffing task, the 2/14/22 daily staffing documentation showed one RNA was assigned to perform ROM exercises and application of splints to all residents. Further review of the daily staffing documents showed no staff was assigned to perform ROM exercises and applications of splints to the residents on 1/3, 1/7, 1/20, 1/22, 1/27, 1/28, 1/29, 2/11, and 2/10/24. Review of the facility's RNA binder showed all residents had the orders for daily RNA services. Further review of the RNA binder showed no RNA services were provided to the residents on 1/1, 1/3, 1/7, 1/8,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-15 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to provide the necessary enteral feeding (a way of delivering nutrition directly to the stomach or small intestine) care and services for five of 12 final sampled residents (Residents 3, 14, 15, 19, and 20) and one nonsampled resident (Resident 2). * The facility failed to ensure Residents 3, 14, 19, and 20's enteral feeding bottles were completely labeled to include the time and rate. * The facility failed to ensure the medications were administered via GT by gravity for Residents 2 and 15. These failures posed the risk for complications related to the use of the enteral feeding for Residents 2, 3, 14, 15, 19, and 20. Findings: 1. Review of the facility's P&P titled Enteral Feeding revised 8/23 showed the enteral feeding will be administered as ordered by the physician, in collaboration with the Registered Dietitian. The procedure also showed to label bag and tubing with date and time hung. a. During the initial…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-15 · tag F0694 — isolatedProvide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the appropriate care and services for IV therapy (the administration of fluids or medications through an IV line) for one of 12 final sampled residents (Resident 8) and one nonsampled resident (Resident 5). * The facility failed to change Resident 8's IV tubing per the date on the label; and the facility failed to ensure Resident 8 had an order for TKO. * The facility failed to label Resident 5's IV tubing with the date to be changed; and the facility failed to ensure Resident 5 had an order for TKO. These failures had the potential for complications related to IV therapy and negative effects related to the residents' medical condition. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Intravenous Therapy Administration reviewed 6/2020 showed specific flow rates or TKO (to keep open) must be ordered by the physician; IV administration set and extension tubing shall be changed two times per week; and all IV…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-15 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to provide safe respiratory care to meet the needs for one of 12 final sampled residents (Resident 13). * The facility failed to ensure Resident 13 was placed on the correct ventilator settings ordered by the physician. In addition, the ventilator machine alarms were not set for high pressure alarms. These failures had the potential to result in poor health outcomes to the resident and posed the risk of delayed intervention in the event of an emergency. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Continuous Mechanical Ventilator revised 7/2023 showed the residents are placed on a mechanical ventilator per the physician's order. The physician will be contacted if the order requires further clarification or if there's a change in the resident condition that requires a change in vent setting. Review of the facility's P&P titled Ventilator Alarm Setting guidelines, troubleshooting and Corrective Action revised…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-15 · tag F0700 — isolatedTry different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and medical record review, the facility failed to ensure the appropriate use of side rails for two of 12 final sampled residents (Residents 8 and 12). The facility failed to ensure the informed consents for side rail use matched the indications for side rail use ordered by the physician for Residents 8 and 12. This failure had the potential to put the residents at risk for entrapment and serious injury. Findings: 1. Medical record review for Resident 8 was initiated on 2/12/24. Resident 8 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. On 2/12/24 at 0840 hours, during an initial tour of the facility, Resident 8 was observed lying in bed with four side rails elevated. Review of Resident 8's Physician Order Report for February 2024 showed a physician's order dated 8/30/21, for the use of bilateral side rails as per the resident's request for safety, every shift. Review of Resident 8's Consent for Use of Side Rails signed 12/10/17, showed the informed consent was obtained for bilateral side…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-15 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the medication error rate was below 5%. * The facility's medication error rate was 48%. Two of three licensed nurses (LVNs 3 and 5) were found to have made errors during the medication administration. These failures resulted in the residents not receiving the prescribed medications as ordered by the physician, which posed the risk of adverse effects for the residents. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Medication Administration revised 7/2013 showed all medications will be administered throughout the hospital utilizing the same standards of practice. The P&P also showed to verify that the medication is being administered at the proper time, in the prescribed dose, and by the correct route. Review of the facility's P&P titled Medication Administration-Eye Drops dated 6/2016 showed where multiple drops and/or ointment are prescribed for one or both eyes, the order of administration is important…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-15 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the medications were stored and labeled properly in two medication carts (Medication Carts A and B) and failed to ensure an expired medication was not stored in Medication Cart A. * Three medications in Medication Cart B and one medication in Medication Cart A did not have clear labels and were unreadable. * Five medications in Medication Cart B and five medications in Medication Cart A did not have no open dates. * One expired medication was found in Medication Cart B. * One drawer from Medication Cart B contained 3 containers of protein powder stored with alcohol gel and hydrogen peroxide 3% in the same drawer. * Medication Cart B contained one bottle of sterile water without an open date * The medication refrigerator contained tuberculin solution without an open date These failures had the potential for the nurses to administer the incorrect medication or expired medications; and had the potential to negatively impact the residents' well-being. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-15 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolatedProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, facility document review, and P&P review, the facility failed to ensure food safety and sanitation in the kitchen as evidenced by: * The FSS did not perform hand hygiene after removing the gloves and touched the food with the dirty gloves during the food preparation. * Resident 9's culinary utensil was not washed and sanitized as per the facility's P&P. * A handwashing sink was used for purposes other than hand washing when the CNA used hand sink to wash the spoon. * The food contact surfaces were not clean. * A hair restraint was not worn during food preparation, * The following nonfood contact surfaces were not clean. * The nonperishable food brought from the outside was not labeled or dated. * The can opener blade was worn. * The test strips used to test the dish machine sanitizer were expired. These failures had the potential to cause outbreak of foodborne illness to one of the 23 facility residents, staff and visitors who consumed food prepared in the kitchen. Findings: Review of the facility matrix showed one of 23 residents received food…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-15 · tag F0813 — isolatedHave a policy regarding use and storage of foods brought to residents by family and other visitors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the staff and visitors who brought food from outside were educated on the safe food handling practices. This failure had the potential to cause the risk of safety of usage, handling, and consumption of foods brought to the residents by the resident's family and visitors. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Food From An Outside Source dated 7/2022 did not show a process to ensure the visitors who brought food from outside or facility staff were educated on the safe food handling guidelines. On 2/13/24 at 0916 hours, an interview was conducted with the DON. The DON stated the staff did not provide the safe food handling education handouts to the visitors who brought food to the residents. On 2/13/24 at 0939 hours, an interview was conducted with the DSD. The DSD stated they did not have copies given for safe food handling education to the visitors. On 2/15/24 at 0945 hours, an interview with the FNSD was conducted. The FNSD confirmed no handouts were given to the visitors regarding education on the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-15 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the appropriate infection control practices designed to provide the safe and sanitary environment were implemented. * LVNs 3, 4, and 5 failed to perform hand washing prior to the administration of medications via GT to three nonsampled residents (Residents 2, 4, and 17). * The trash can in Resident 4's room was overfilled with yellow gowns which was used for contact precaution isolation. * The facility's infection control committee did not meet for one quarter to discuss the residents who did not meet McGeer's criteria in November 2023. These failures posed the risk for transmission of disease causing microorganism, and resulted for the committee not able to discuss about the residents on antibiotics who did not meet McGeer's criteria. Findings: 1. Review of the facility P&P titled Medication Administration Via Feeding Tube revised on 8/2021 showed steps in procedure to wash hands before crushing pills and administering…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-15 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — isolatedKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, facility document review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to maintain the essential equipment in a safe operating condition. * The facility failed to ensure the ice machine located in the kitchen was cleaned and sanitized as per the manufacturer's guidelines. * The facility failed to ensure the medication refrigerator was maintained and the freezer compartment inside the medication refrigerator was free of ice buildup. These failures had the potential for the refrigerator not being maintained in a safe operating condition and posed the risk of ice contamination and equipment to function improperly. Findings: Review of the [Manitowoc] ice machine manufacturer's guidelines, Section 4, showed in part, to use only [Manitowoc] approved metal safe ice machine de-scaler (part number 000000084) and [Manitowoc] Sanitizer 9 (part number 9405653). Detailed De-scaling/Sanitizing procedure as follows: to be performed every six months. All ice must be removed from the bin. The ice machine and bin must be disassembled, descaled, and sanitized. The ice…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-09-19 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — patternProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to implement the resident-centered activity programs to meet the residents' needs and interests for one sampled resident (Resident 2) and 22 nonsampled residents (Residents A, B, C, D, E, F, G, H, I, J, K, L, M, N, O, P, Q, R, S, T, U, and V). This failure had the potential to negatively affectthe residents' psychosocial well-being. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Activities Program, Resident reviewed August 2023 showed a purpose to provide activities designed to appeal to the resident's interests and abilities to assist in achieving the highest level of physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being possible. The P&P also showed to develop the care plan designed to improve the resident's quality of life, develop and arrange suitable activities, and post the scheduled activities on the unit. On 9/7/23 at 1550 hours, an interview was conducted with the Subacute Unit Director. The Subacute Unit…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2025-02-13 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — patternKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the resident's protected health information was utilized in a confidential manner for one of 12 final sampled residents (Resident 10). * Resident 10's protected health information was displayed on a staff computer screen located in the residents' hallway. The facility staff left the computer unattended on two occasions, while Resident 10's protected health information was displayed. This failure had the potential to violate the resident's right to protected health information privacy. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Confidentiality of Medical Records revised 12/2022 showed the information contained within the medical record belongs to the resident and will be kept confidential. Employees and medical staff are expected to exercise due care in any discussion, use, or disclosure of the protected health information. Medical record review for Resident 10 was initiated on 2/10/25. Resident 10…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2025-02-13 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain a homelike environment for four of 12 final sampled residents (Residents 10, 14, 18, and 23). * Resident 23 resided in Room A and Residents 10, 14, and 18 resided in Room B. The walls behind the residents' beds were observed in disrepair as evidenced by holes, scratches, unfinished patchwork, and/or peeled paint. This failure had the potential to negatively impact the residents' well-being. Findings: On 2/13/25 at 1438 hours, an observation was conducted of Resident 23. Resident 23 was observed lying in his bed in Room A. The wall behind Resident 23's bed was observed with a hole, scratches, and unfinished patch work. On 2/13/25 at 1440 hours, an observation was conducted of Room B. Residents 10, 14, and 18 resided in Room B. The residents were observed lying in their beds. The wall behind the residents' beds was observed in disrepair as evidenced by holes, scratches, unfinished patchwork, and peeled paint. The residents who resided in Rooms A and B were not interviewable, as the residents were cognitively impaired.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2025-02-13 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — patternDispose of garbage and refuse properly.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, facility P&P review, and facility document review, the facility failed to ensure the facility's garbage and refuse was properly disposed as evidence by: * The facility failed to ensure two of eight waste dumpsters were properly closed and not overfilled with trash. This failure had the potential to cause unsafe sanitary conditions and potential to harbor pests and rodents. Findings: According to the USDA Food Code 2022, Section 5-501.11 Storing Refuse, Recyclables, and Returnables showed refuse, recyclables, and returnables shall be stored in receptacles or waste handling units so that they are inaccessible to insects and rodents. According to the USDA Food Code 2022, Section 5-501.113 Covering Receptacles: Receptacles and waste handling units for refuse, recyclables, and returnables shall be kept covered. (A) Inside the food establishment if the receptacles and units: (1) Contain food residue and are not in continuous use (2) After they are filled; and (B) With tight-fitting or doors if kept outside the food establishment. Review of the facility's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2024-02-15 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — patternHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and medical record review, the facility failed to promote the dignity and respect for one nonsampled resident (Resident 9). * CNA 4 was observed standing over Resident 9 while assisting and feeding the resident with his lunch. This failure posed the risk of not treating the resident with respect. Findings: Medical record review for Resident 9 was initiated on 2/12/24. Resident 9 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and readmitted on [DATE]. On 2/12/24 at 1229 hours, a lunch meal observation of Resident 9 and concurrent interview was conducted with CNA 4. CNA 4 was observed standing over Resident 9 while assisting and feeding him. The DSD entered the room and offered CNA 4 a stool. CNA 4 continued assisting and feeding Resident 9 while he stood over Resident 9. CNA 4 stated he preferred to stand in case of an emergency involving Resident 9. On 2/12/24 at 1447 hours, an interview was conducted with the DSD. The DSD acknowledged the findings and verified feeding of the residents…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · B2024-02-15 · tag F0582 — patternGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and facility document review, the facility failed to provide one nonsampled resident (Resident 526) with the Skilled Nursing Facility Advance Beneficiary Notice of Non-coverage (SNF ABN) Form CMS-10055). This failure had the potential of not allowing Resident 526 to make an informed decision regarding their Medicare services. Findings: Medical record review for Resident 526 who was discharged from the facility showed no documented evidence of the SNF ABN Form CMS-10055 was provided to the resident. On 2/15/24 at 1025 hours, an interview and concurrent facility document review was conducted with the Social Worker and DON. The Social Worker was asked to provide the evidence of the original notice or documentation the SNF ABN Form CMS-10055 was provided to three residents who were discharged with Medicare Part A benefit days remaining. The Social Worker stated it was before his time, and he thought the facility did not provide the SNF ABN form to the residents. The DON stated they were informed by the billing department as to how many Medicare days the residents had…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2024-02-15 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — patternKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to provide the personal privacy for two nonsampled residents (Residents 2 and 17) when the nurses failed to provide full privacy to the residents during the medication administration via GT. This failure had the potential to negatively affect the dignity of the residents and violate the residents' right to privacy. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Resident Privacy & Confidentiality revised 8/2005 showed the resident's right to personal privacy and confidentiality will be fully recognized, and always use curtains to provide full visual privacy when caring for the resident. 1. Medical record review for Resident 17 was initiated on 2/13/24. Resident 17 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. On 2/14/24 at 0815 hours, a medication administration observation was conducted with LVN 3 in Resident 17's room. LVN 3 did not pull Resident 17's privacy curtain all the way prior to accessing the resident's GT site for medication…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · B2024-02-15 · tag F0635 — patternProvide doctor's orders for the resident's immediate care at the time the resident was admitted.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, facility document review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to obtain the physician's order for an adaptive device for one nonsampled resident (Resident 9). This failure had the potential for Resident 9 to not receive the appropriate care and services in the facility. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Physician Orders revised 12/2008 showed all orders for the medications, procedures, and devices shall be clearly documented in writing in the resident's medical record. Medical record review for Resident 9 was initiated on 2/12/24. Resident 9 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE]. On 2/12/24 at 1148 hours, observation was conducted with CNA 4 who was assisting and feeding Resident 9. CNA 4 placed the adaptive device on Resident 9's left hand. Further review of Resident 9's medical record failed to show documented evidence of a physician's order for the use of adaptive device and spoon to assist the resident during the mealtime. On 2/13/24 at 1126 hours,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2024-02-15 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — patternDispose of garbage and refuse properly.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and USDA Food Code review, the facility failed to ensure the safe handling and collection of regular waste. This failure posed the risk for safety and pest contamination . Findings: 1. According to the USDA Food Code 2022 Section 5-501.110. Storing refuse, recyclables and returnables, shall be stored in receptacles or waste handling units so that they are inaccessible to insects and rodents. According to the USDA Food Code 2022 Section 5-502.11. Frequency. refuse, recyclable and returnables, shall be removed from the premises at a frequency that will minimize the development of objectionable order and other conditions that attract or harbor insects and rodents. On 2/13/24 at 0850 hours, an observation and concurrent interview was conducted with the EVS Supervisor. Broken glass, more than ten cardboard boxes, a microwave, a weighing scale and an office chair were found on the ground in the dumpster area of the facility. The EVS Supervisor verified it was unsafe and posed the risk for pest contamination. 2. According to the USDA Food Section 2022…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · B2023-08-31 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — patternMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure the environmental conditions were kept sanitary as evidenced by: * Total of four resident rooms (Rooms A, B, C, and D) and one hallway area used by the residents, staff, and visitors were not kept in the sanitary conditions. This failure posed the risk of unsanitary and unsafe conditions for the residents, staff, and visitors. Findings: On 8/25/23 at 1309 hours, an environmental inspection was conducted with the Facilities Operator and Quality Risk Manager. The following was observed: - Resident Room A had a circular yellow stain and holes in the ceiling near a resident's bed. Also, the peeling paint and holes were observed on the wall at the head of a resident's bed. - Resident Room B's sink had yellow stains and broken tiles. - Resident Room C had bubbling condition on the wall near a resident's bed. - Resident Room D's air conditioner vent cover located above the resident's head of bed had black substance on it. In addition, the ceiling near the resident's bed had holes. - The hallway ceiling near Resident Room E…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| KPC HEALTHCARE, INC. | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 11/30/2004 |
| KPC HEALTHCARE HOLDINGS INC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 08/28/2015 |
| VICTOR VALLEY HOSPITAL ACQUISITION INC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 12/29/2021 |
| BERTON, THERESA | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE; CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 01/02/2023 |
| CHAUDHURI, KALI | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 09/01/2014 |
| THOMAS, WILLIAM | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 09/01/2014 |
| EDWARD, AMIR ADOLPHE | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 12/01/2023 |
| KPC GLOBAL MANAGEMENT LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 08/28/2015 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 10 rows in the source record cover these 8 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
What families pay in CA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 555709. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-04-09, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.