Oroville Hospital Post-Acute Center
1000 Executive Parkway, Oroville, CA 95966 · Non profit - Corporation · 126 certified beds · (530) 533-7335 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited May 2026
- inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (48) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $45,500 in federal fines (most recent 2024-07-23)
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
- its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (1/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 3 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 1 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 1 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 1 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 2 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 23.5% | 10.2% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 16.5% | 4.0% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 4.0% | 0.8% | 0.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 2.9% | 1.2% | 2.0% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 0.8% | 7.3% | 6.5% | better |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.4% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 5.5% | 1.6% | 3.3% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 27.9% | 9.8% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 32.5% | 13.7% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 98.9% | 98.2% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 14.9% | 4.3% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 16.9% | 10.2% | 21.2% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 31.0% | 12.0% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 4.5% | 1.5% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 90.9% | 93.2% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 29.0% | 23.0% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 5.0% | 11.2% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 2.29 | 2.25 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 0.56 | 1.57 | 1.80 | better |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
43.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 559 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 40.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 152 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.49 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 80% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 12% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 43.0%CMS range 38.2–47.9 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | worse than U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 16.0%CMS range 13.1–18.6 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | worse than U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 40.1% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 63.2% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 31.6% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 97.1% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 97.5% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 88.6% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 1.1% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 2.9% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 11.6%CMS range 8.6–14.6 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | worse than U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.96 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 126 beds and averages 113.0 residents a day — about 90% occupied, or roughly 13 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 5.44 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.53 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.37 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.84 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.69 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.58 to 0.39 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
48 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 37 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-07-23 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure one of 12 sampled residents (Resident 1) was free from mistreatment, misappropriation of property, and mental abuse when he was abducted (removed by force) from the facility by a restricted visitor (not authorized to visit or call). This resulted in Resident 1 to be taken out of the facility for 90 minutes with a restricted visitor who would attempt to financially abuse him. An Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) situation was identified on 7/19/24 at 3:45 pm, in the presence of the Executive Director (ED) and Director of Staff Development (DSD), due to not implementing a restricted visitor screening system that ensured residents were protected from any type of abuse from unauthorized visitors. An immediate jeopardy removal plan was requested from the ED and DSD. An IJ removal plan was provided by the ED and accepted on 7/19/24 at 4 pm. The IJ removal plan included all facility staff training on the new policy titled Visitation which included checking…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-06-25 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — patternProvide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure staff assigned to perform food and nutrition services possessed the competencies and skill sets necessary to carry out those functions. When the facility utilized Certified Nursing Assistants (CNA) to prepare and alter food without documented training or competency validation. These failures had the potential to place residents, a highly susceptible population, at risk of receiving improperly prepared or altered meals that did not meet prescribed therapeutic diets, texture modification, nutritional requirements.Findings:A review of the undated facility's Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) job description identified the CNA's primary duties included providing direct resident care, assisting with activities of daily living, feeding residents, obtaining vital signs, and completing resident documentation. The CNA job description did not include food preparation or food and nutrition service functions as assigned duties.A review of the undated facility's Dietary Aide (DA) job description indicated that the DA's essential…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-05-08 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview the facility failed to maintain food safety requirements in the kitchen for all residents receiving their nutritional intake from the kitchen when a gallon of milk and a jar of dill pickle relish were not labeled with the open date following the opening and use of the products.This failure had the potential to result in improper prolonged, out of date use leading to disease transmission, increasing environmental health complications, and overall wellbeing issues to those residents' receiving their nutritional intake from the facility kitchen.Findings:During a review of facility's policy and procedure titled, Labeling and Dating of Foods, dated 2023, indicated, Newly opened food items will need to be closed and labeled with an open date and use by the date that follows the various storage guidelines.During an observation and interview on 5/5/26 at 11:00 am, with Dietary Service Manager (DSM) in the kitchen the three-door refrigerator was observed for adequate food storage. The DSM confirmed that the gallon of milk and jar of pickle relish were not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2026-05-08 · tag F0851 — widespreadElectronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to submit the required Payroll Based Journaling (PBJ), staffing information to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS).This failure has the potential for nursing homes to have inadequate staffing to care for residents and can lead to adverse clinical outcomes. Findings:During a concurrent interview and record review on 5/5/26 at 8:00 am., with the Director of Nursing (DON), the PBJ reporting data was reviewed, the PBJ indicated the CASPER report 1705D fiscal year quarter 1 2026 (October1 - December 31), the facility failed to submit data for the quarter. DON stated they tried to submit the PBJ, but their password didn't work and they did not contact CMS in a timely manner.The facility was unable to provide evidence, by the conclusion of the survey on 5/8/26, demonstrating compliance with the regulatory requirement to submit Payroll-Based Journal (PBJ) data and reports to CMS.
- Potential for harm · F2026-05-08 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — widespreadKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to maintain essential equipment in operable condition affecting all residents that partake in nutrition provided by the kitchen facility and residents using bathroom units when:1. The oven in the kitchen had broken doors rendering the unit inoperable to perform the function of cooking.2.The wall by the dishwasher unit had incomplete repairs performed leaving the drywall open to moisture, and potential mold and bacterial growth which could result in infection control issues and food borne illness propagation.3.The bathroom facilities, sink and toilet, in room [ROOM NUMBER] were not working. These failures had the potential to create an inhospitable environment for residents to reach their highest practicable level of health and well-being when not offered the basic essentials for adequate nutrition and available facilities at their procurable disposal.Findings: During a review of the document titled, Job Description for the Maintenance…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-05-08 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and home-like environment for four of 24 sampled residents (Residents 34, 42, 45, and 59) when the facility failed to maintain resident's personal clothing and belongings, resulting in lost clothing items.This failure had the potential to compromise residents' dignity, comfort, and quality of life.Findings:During a review of the facilities policy titled, Theft and Loss Control, undated, indicated the facility would make efforts to safeguard residents' personal property and valuables and that suspected loss or theft of resident property would be timely and thoroughly investigated. The policy further indicated residents clothing was to be permanently labeled with a laundry marking pen or identifying tag. During a review of the facility policy titled, Notice of Theft and Loss Control Policy, undated, indicated staff would be oriented to theft and loss investigation procedures upon hire and during regular…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-08 · tag F0636 — patternAssess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete:The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment in a timely manner for one of five sampled residents (Resident 123).The Annual MDS assessments for two of five sampled residents (Residents 14 and 126).These failures had the potential to delay the development of comprehensive care plans necessary to provide appropriate, individualized care and services for Residents 14, 123, and 126 to attain and maintain their highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being.Findings:A review of the he Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) Manual, dated 10/1/25. The RAI Manual requires admission MDS assessments to be completed within 14 calendar days of admission and Annual MDS assessments within 14 days of the Assessment Reference Date (ARD-the specific endpoint of a look-back period for an MDS assessment in long-term care).A review of Resident 123's clinical records indicated Resident 123 was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-08 · tag F0638 — patternAssure that each resident’s assessment is updated at least once every 3 months.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment within 92 calendar days of the previous assessment for two of five sampled residents (Residents 11 and 12). This failure had the potential to delay the development of comprehensive care plans necessary to provide appropriate, individualized care and services for Residents 11 and 12.Findings:A review of Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) Manual, effective 10/1/25, indicates that Quarterly Review assessment must be completed no less frequently than every 92 days. The ARD for a quarterly assessment must be set no later than 92 days after the ARD of the previous assessment (Admission, Annual, or Quarterly).A review of Resident 11's clinical record indicated Resident 11 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including diabetes type 2 (high blood sugar), restless legs, and hypertension (high blood pressure). Resident 11's most recent MDS assessment, dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-05-08 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — patternProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and a review of facility records, the facility failed to maintain adequate nursing staff to meet residents' care needs, when:1.Resident council meetings and resident grievances from January to May 2026 documented delays in staff response to call lights.2.Seven of twenty-four residents reported insufficient direct care staff, resulting in delayed responses to call lights and inadequate assistance with activities of daily living, including toileting, oral care, and pain management. 3.The facility did not take resident acuity (complexity and intensity of care needs) into account when scheduling Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) staff for the [NAME] and North Nursing Stations.As a result of these staffing deficiencies, resident care needs were not consistently met. Residents expressed feelings of neglect and frustration due to delayed responses and unmet care preferences.Findings:1.A review of Resident Council meeting minutes and grievance forms revealed repeated concerns:On 01/21/2026, a resident commented, call light response times are too long, while another asked…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-08 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that one out of 24 sampled residents (Resident 46) was free from abuse when Resident 128 punched Resident 46 in the face.The incident resulted in a laceration to Resident 46's upper lip requiring stitches and caused temporary feelings of insecurity regarding personal safety. Findings: A review of the facility's policy and procedure titled, Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation, and Misappropriation of Resident Property Prohibition, revised 7/15/21, indicated, residents had the right to be free from physical abuse.A review of Resident 46's admission Record, dated 9/1/24, indicated, admission to the facility on 9/1/24 with the diagnoses of anxiety (feelings of fear and worry) and personal history of traumatic brain injury (a head injury that caused impaired thinking). Resident 46 was not their own responsible party (RP, decision maker). A review of Resident 128's admission Record, dated 3/25/26, indicated, admission to the facility on 3/25/26 with the diagnosis of an unspecified mental disorder (the resident had a mental health…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-05-08 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that adequate dialysis (a life-saving medical treatment performed to filter toxins out of the blood) care and services were provided for one of one sampled resident (Resident 42), when: Required dialysis communication forms were missing and incomplete.Licensed Nurses did not perform and document daily assessments of the resident's dialysis fistula (the surgically created access used for dialysis).Resident 42's care plan (a document that described resident goals and the care that would be provided) did not include instructions describing the assessments required for monitoring the fistula. This failure had the potential to result in undetected, life-threatening complication. Findings: 1.A review of the facility's undated policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Dialysis, indicated, the facility and dialysis center would communicate with each other by utilizing the Dialysis Transfer Form. A review of Resident 42's admission Record, dated 1/4/25, indicated admission to the facility on 1/4/25 with the diagnoses…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 37 citations
- Potential for harm · D2026-05-08 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one out of five sampled residents (Resident 12) was free from unnecessary medications when the required psychotropic (a medication that altered the brain) medication informed consent form was not renewed every six months as required.This failure had the potential to compromise Resident 12's ability to maintain their highest practicable mental, physical, and psychosocial well-being.Findings: A review of the facility's undated policy and procedure titled, Informed Consent for Psychotropic Drugs, indicated the facility would follow Federal and State regulations regarding informed consent when the Physician prescribed a psychotropic medication. A review of the All Facilities Letter (an official document that notified facilities of changes to regulations), dated 10/7/25, indicated psychotropic informed consent forms were required to be renewed every six months. A review of Resident 12's admission Record, dated 11/3/20, indicated admission the facility on 11/3/20 with the diagnoses of chronic (long lasting) pain and major…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-14 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to protect one of ten sampled residents (Resident 2) when: 1. Registered Nurse (RN) B willfully took the bed remote from Resident 2 and hid it out of reach.2. RN B willfully shut the door while Resident 2 was yelling for help. 3. RN B willfully left Resident 2 in isolation and neglected to provide services needed. This failure caused involuntary seclusion (isolation) to Resident 2, and the potential for emotional distress, and a fall.Findings: During a review of the facility's policy revised 7/15/21 titled, Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation, and Misappropriation of Resident Property Prohibition, indicated each resident has the right to be free from verbal, sexual, physical, and mental abuse, corporal punishment, and involuntary seclusion. Each resident also has the right to be free from mistreatment, neglect and misappropriation of property. The definition of abuse is the willful infliction of injury, unreasonable confinement, intimidation, or punishment with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-22 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow the care plan for one of three residents (Resident 1) when Resident 1 was left unattended in his room when a hospitality aide (HA - someone hired by the facility to provide non-medical assistance to residents, focused on their comfort, safety, and well-being) took a break and left Resident 1's room. This failure had the potential to result in physical and/or psychosocial harm to other residents when Resident 1 eloped (unsupervised wandering) from his room and entered Resident 2's room. Findings: A record review of facility job description titled Job Description for Hospitality Aide dated 4/1/22 indicated HAs must demonstrate the ability to .understand, plan and carryout resident care plans. A record review of facility policy titled Care Plans (undated) did not indicate any policy related to developing, implementing or following resident care plans. A record review of Resident 1's admission Record indicated he was admitted to the facility on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-12-18 · tag F0625 — patternNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide five residents (Residents 2, 14, 73, 130, 292) out of a sample of 32 with the bed hold agreement in writing when residents were transferred out of the facility to a hospital or for therapeutic leave. This failure had the potential for residents to be unaware that, for a period of up to seven days after the transfer, the facility must readmit them when the resident is ready to return, and that the resident has only a 24-hour window in which to inform the facility that they intend to return. Findings: A facility document titled, California Standard admission Agreement for Skilled Nursing Facilities and Intermediate Care Facilities, undated, was reviewed. The document is a collection of information provided to residents when they are admitted to the facility. Contained in the document is the facility's bed hold policy which outlines that they will hold a resident's bed for seven days upon transfer to a hospital, and that the resident has 24 hours…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-18 · tag F0636 — patternAssess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete the Comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS, a standardized resident assessment) for 12 of 29 sampled residents (Residents 41, 44, 7, 87, 73, 27, 55, 96, 100, 291, 293, and 294) when MDS assessments were not completed within 14 days. These failures had the potential to delay the development of a comprehensive care plan necessary to provide the appropriate individualized care and services for Resident 44 and 41 related to the care areas identified on the Comprehensive MDS. Findings: The Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) Manual gives clear guidance about how to complete the MDS. According to the RAI, Chapter 2 page 9, Assessment completion refers to the date that all information has been collected and recorded for the particular assessment type and staff have signed and dated that the assessment is complete. Page 10 indicated that Comprehensive MDS assessments include Annual Assessments. Page 17 indicated that the Annual assessment completion…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-12-18 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure seven of twenty-nine sampled residents (Resident 5, 334, 23, 29, 73, 291, and 46) received the necessary treatment and services to maintain ADL's (activities of daily living). when: 1. Resident 5's lunch tray was not set up by staff and therefore she was unable to eat. 2. Resident 334's fingernails were long with black matter underneath them. 3. Resident 23 stated, staff did not assist with oral care or hair brushing unless Resident 23 asked for help. 4. Resident 29's hair was tangled. 5. Resident 73's mucus membranes (the moist, inner lining if the mouth) were dried and contained a thick, white, debris that was attached to the roof of the mouth and the tongue. 6. Resident 291 didn't receive consistent oral care. 7, Resident 46 didn't receive consistent oral care. This deficient practice had the potential for the residents to decline in their abilities to achieve the resident's highest practicable well-being and quality of life.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-12-18 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that residents receive treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice for two out of 29 sampled residents (Residents 44 and 5) when: 1. Coccyx (the skin over the tailbone) treatments were not provided for Resident 44 who had Moisture Associated Skin Damage (MASD, skin breakdown caused by prolonged expsure to moisture). This failure had the potential for Resident 44's health and wellbeing to decline and her skin redness to worsen. 2. The facility failed to ensure consistent assessments of a skin condition for Resident 5. This failure had the potential for a change in condition to go unattended, with possible negative health outcomes for Resident 5. Findings: During a review of the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled Skin Integrity (undated), the P&P indicated, In an effort to maintain the resident's optimal level of skin integrity and promote healing of skin . wounds, the Center has a systematic approach and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-12-18 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement downtime policies and procedures (P&P) when there was an internet outage on 12/13/24. This failure caused an inability for facility staff to access the residents electronic medical record (EMR) and could cause a delay in resident care needs. Findings: A review of the undated P&P titled, Downtime Access to Patient Records, indicated, Each day HER Support will run and save a copy of the 24 Hr. Summary. The P&P indicated, Staff members will have access to the downtime folder and will be able to pull up the 24 Hr. Summary for review or print out hard copy. The P&P indicated, In the event of a network outage or scheduled network maintenance, staff will be able to access the EMR system (Point Click Care) by using a jetpack device to connect to wireless network. We will then activate emergency access protocol to allow staff to access the EMR remotely. During a concurrent observation, located at the East Wing nurses' station, and interview on 12/13/24 at 7:11 am, unidentified staff members were observed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-12-18 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — patternEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility had a 27.59% medication error rate when eight medication errors out of 29 total opportunities were observed during medication passes for two out of six sampled residents (Residents 73 and 184). These failures had the potential to compromise the resident's health status. Findings: A review of the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Medication Administration, dated 1/1/07, indicated, medication would be administered utilizing good nursing principles and in accordance with physician orders. A review of the undated Admissions Record indicated, Resident 73 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnoses of dysphagia, oropharyngeal stage (swallowing difficulty that occurred in the mouth or throat), dementia (memory loss), and gastrostomy status (surgical opening into the stomach, [peg-tube also called g-tube, that delivered liquid nutrition and medication]). Resident 73 was not her own responsible party (did not make own decisions). A…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-12-18 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store and label drugs in accordance with professional standards when: 1. The label attached to a medication container did not match the Physician's order. 2a. The freezer section, located in the medication refrigerator, of the [NAME] Wing medication storage room, contained ice build up and had icicles hanging from the freezer. 2b. An e-kit, (emergency medication) that was in the medication refrigerator of the [NAME] Wing medication storage room, was placed inside a tray like container that contained ice and clear liquid. 3. The medication cart, located on the [NAME] Wing, contained 2 unlabeled medication cups, each containing resident medication, and a pill cutter (a device that was used to cut pills in half) that was covered in residual pill powder. 4. The e-kit, located in the East Wing medication room contained two vials of liquid Ativan (a controlled substance that was used to treat anxiety disorders) was expired (not to be used). 5.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-18 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — patternProvide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure staff were trained, competent and following their training when: *1. The kitchen was not sanitary. *2. Staff did not consistently perform standards of professional practice to prevent cross contamination. *3. Staff did not consistently complete or document ambient food cooling temperature checks. *4. Pureed fish did not have a palatable consistency. Findings: Review of an undated document titled New Hire - OHPAC Dietary Employee Orientation Checklist showed that upon hire new employees are trained in 24 different topics, including dress code (jewelry, hair covering, aprons), proper use of aprons, equipment cleaning. Review of employee training files showed these staff completed the training: Kitchen Staff I (KS I) on 4/4/24, and KS K on 4/4/24. Review of a document titled Annual - OHPAC Dietary Employee Orientation Checklist showed 24 topics assessed, such as handwashing and glove use, dress code, apron use, cleaning equipment, cleaning and pest prevention, and monitoring tray line temperatures was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-12-18 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — patternEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility did not follow a preplanned standardized menu cycle or cooks spreadsheets for vegetarian meals, and had the potential to not meet the nutritional needs of vegetarian residents. Findings: A review of the Facility Assessment (explains what types of patients/residents a facility will accept and services it will provide) dated 1/31/24 and signed by the Executive Director (Administrator), Director of Nursing (DON), Medical Director, and Governing Body Representative showed We as a facility, make sure we have the staff to meet the unique needs of the individuals at all times. Part 2 Services and Care We Offer Based on our Residents' Needs showed Nutrition - Individualized dietary requirements, liberal diets, specialized diets, tube feeding, cultural or ethnic dietary needs, assistive devices, fluid monitoring or restrictions. A review of the California Health and Safety Code Section §1265.10 showed Availability of plant-based meals: (a) A licensed health facility, as defined in subdivision (a), (b), (c), (d), (f), or (k) of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-18 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure food was served at an appetizing temperature when four out of twenty nine residents interviewed (Resident 29, 44, 54, 284) stated the food was cold. This failure had the potential to result in decreased resident meal intakes, weight loss, and decline in health status. Findings: During an observation and concurrent interview with KS J on 12/11/24 at 10:00 am he stated he checked his steam table temperatures daily to ensure they were 150°F to 160°F. In a later review of a recipe titled Recipe: Pureed (IDDSI Level 4) Meats dated 2024, it showed Serve on trayline at the recommended temperature of 160°F to 180°F. During an interview conducted on 12/10/24 at 10:16 am, Resident 29 stated the food was terrible. A review of Resident 29's diet orders showed a 4/15/2024 order for regular fortified (extra nutrients added) mechanical soft texture (soft and easy to chew) diet. On 11/27/2024, a calorie dense nutritional supplement 120ml two times a day between meals was added to improve nutrition intake. During an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-12-18 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — patternEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure six resident's (Resident #70, #288, #334, #336, #338) individual texture needs were met when the food consistencies provided did not meet facility diet manual standards or resident preferences. This failure had the potential to result in resident's inability to consume their food resulting in decreased intakes and decline, or to potentially result in choking and death. Findings: Parsley Garnish: Review of the cook's spreadsheets titled Winter Menus, Week 2 Wednesday, dated 12/11/24 showed pureed and mechanical soft diets were to receive parsley flakes as garnish rather than whole parsley sprigs (to reduce risk of choking). Review of the facility diet manual, approved by the facility Registered Dietitian (RD) and Medical Director on 8/24/23 provided this description of the regular pureed diet: The pureed diet is a regular diet that has been designed for residents who have difficulty chewing and/or swallowing. The texture should be of a smooth and moist consistency and able to hold its shape. Under foods…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-18 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain professional standards of practice to ensure food service safety for the residents of the facility when: 1. The kitchen was not sanitary. 2. Kitchen staff did not follow professional standards of practice to avoid cross contamination in food production processes. 3. Ambient food cool down process was not performed consistently when indicated. 4. There was not an effective process in place for management of dented cans. 5. Three out of three nursing unit nourishment rooms were not sanitary. 6. Chemicals that were not food-safe were used to clean food contact surfaces in nursing unit nourishment rooms. These failures had the potential to spread infection and cause food borne illness for residents consuming food in the facility. An event of food borne illness has the potential to cause a resident' decline or even death. Findings: 1. The kitchen was not sanitary. Review of the 2022 Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Food Code 4-601.11 showed A) Equipment food-contact surfaces and utensils shall be clean…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-12-18 · tag F0813 — patternHave a policy regarding use and storage of foods brought to residents by family and other visitors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure sanitary food storage for resident's personal food in three out of three nursing unit nourishment rooms. Resident food stored in the freezer were not labeled with patient identifiers (name, room number and date) to ensure the correct patient received their personal food items. These failures had the potential to cause foodborne illness and decline in residents, and to decrease resident's quality of life if personal foods were discarded or given to someone else due to lack of labeling. Findings: Review of an undated facility policy titled Food for Residents from Outside Sources showed staff were to label residents personal food with their name and the date received. Disposal dates depended on the type of food, storage requirements, opened or unopened, etc. It stated the facility would not heat food from home for residents. Review of the 2022 FDA (Food and Drug Administration) Food Code 4-601.11 showed A) Equipment food-contact…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-12-18 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — patternHave a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Quality Assessment and Performance Improvement (QAPI - a data driven proactive approach to improvement used to ensure services are meeting quality standards) was utilized effectively for identifying and resolving deficiency related to timely complete residents' assessment for 13of 29 sampled residents (Residents 41, 44, 7, 87, 73, 14, 27, 55, 96, 100, 291, 293, and 294). This failure had the potential to inaccurately reflect the data relative to the residents' health status, and delay the developments of a comprehensive, individualized care plan for the residents. Refer to F 636 Findings: During a review of the facility's policy titled, Quality Assessment and Performance Improvement, no revised date provided, indicated: a. The Goals of the QAPI committee is to: - Help identify actual and potential negative outcomes relative to resident care and resolve them appropriately. - Support the use of root cause analysis to help identify where patterns of negative outcomes point to underlying systematic problems. - Help…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-12-18 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — patternSet up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility's Quality Assessment and Assurance (QAA) committee failed to development and implement appropriate plans of action to correct identified deficiency related to infection control. As a result, deficient practices were present regarding infection control that had the potential to affect the safety and quality of care provided to residents. Refer to F 880. Findings: During a review of the facility's policy titled, Quality Assessment and Performance Improvement, no revised date provided, at the section of QAPI program, indicated: a. Design and scope: Goals, targets and benchmarks are established and measured based on the best available evidence. b. Governance and leadership: - Input is sought from facility staff, residents, family members and individuals who are involved in the care of residents. - Resources are allocated to conduct QAPI efforts. - Feedback, data systems and monitoring c. Systems are in place to monitor care and services: - Systems are designed to incorporate feedback from caregivers, residents, family, and staff as…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-18 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure effective infection control practices when: 1. Facility staff did not perform hand hygiene during meal service. 2. Nursing unit resident nourishment rooms were not sanitary. (Refer to F812, F813, F925.) 3. Chemicals that were not food-safe were used to clean food contact surfaces in nursing unit nourishment rooms Refer to 812. 4. The RNA (Resource Nursing Assistant) Room was unsanitary and had live cockroaches. Refer to F925. 5. Resident 8's CPAP (continuous positive airway pressure-a breathing machine designed to increase air pressure, keeping the airway open when the person breathes in) and Nebulizer (a small machine that turns liquid medicine into a mist that can be easily inhaled) mask had white and brown spots throughout the masks and oxygen tubing on the floor where a bug was crawling. 6. A bed pan was stored under a resident's bed for her use. 7. Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) didn't follow infection control policy while…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-12-18 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — patternMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and facility review the facility failed to ensure they maintained an effective pest control program when: 1. An unidentified bug was seen crawling in resident room [ROOM NUMBER]. 2. Cockroaches were seen crawling around in the Restorative Nursing Assistant (RNA)room (the dining room that Residents eat in which includes a small kitchen area). This failure had the potential to cause a health hazard to the residents and did not honor their right for a homelike environment. Findings: During a review of the facility's policy titled Pest Control (undated), the policy indicated The facility is committed to implementing an effective pest control program in compliance with federal, state and local regulations. The purpose of the policy was To maintain a safe and healthy environment for residents, staff and visitors by preventing, identifying, and addressing pest infestations within the skilled nursing facility. 4. Preventive Measures . The maintenance Department will . Maintain…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-18 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolatedHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility to address resident's grievance of staff going through resident's personal belongings without resident's permission for one of eight sampled residents (Resident 183). This deficient practice had the potential for Resident 183's grievance to go unnoticed, causing anger and distress to the resident; and had the potential to result in a delay of care and services. Findings: During a review of the facility's policy titled, Grievance Procedure, no revised date provided, indicated: a. Residents have the right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and without fear of discrimination or reprisal. b. At admission, the patient or patient Responsible Party (RP) informs the Resident/Resident's Authorized Representative about their right to voice grievances orally, in writing, and anonymously regarding the care and treatment/lack of treatment, behavior of staff and of other residents, and other concerns during their stay. c. The Executive…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-18 · tag F0623 — isolatedProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a written notice of transfer or discharge for one of three residents (Resident 292) (or resident representee, RP) was provided to Resident 292 and to the office of the State Long-Term Care (LTC) Ombudsman (a person who investigates and helps resolve complaints for residents) when they were sent to the hospital for emergency care. This failure had the potential to result in the lack of coordination of support for Resident 292 during discharge planning. Findings: A review of the facility's policy titled Attachment F: Resident [NAME] of Rights (undated) indicated on page 26 -27 that before a facility transfers or discharges a resident, the facility must-notify the resident and, if known a, a family member or legal representative of the resident of the transfer or discharge and the reasons for the move in writing and in a language and manner they understand. The written notice must include the following: a. The reason for the transfer or discharge,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-18 · tag F0638 — isolatedAssure that each resident’s assessment is updated at least once every 3 months.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS, a standardized resident assessment) withing 92 days of the previous assessment for two of nine sampled residents (Resident 57 and 8). This failure had the potential to delay the development of a comprehensive care plan necessary to provide the appropriate individualized care and services for Resident 57 and Resident 8 related to the care areas identified on the MDS. Findings: The Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) Manual dated October 2024, gives clear guidance about how to complete the MDS. According to the RAI, Chapter 2 page 9, Assessment completion refers to the date that all information has been collected and recorded for the particular assessment type and staff have signed and dated that the assessment is complete. Page 35 indicated that Quarterly MDS assessments completion date (item Z0500B) must be no later than 92 days from the previous assessment (previous assessment date +92 calendar days). The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-18 · tag F0645 — isolatedPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Level 1 Preadmission Screening and Resident Interview (PASARR, an assessment that screened individuals with a mental disorder or intellectual disability to determine if admission to the facility was appropriate) was inaccurate for one out of three sampled residents (Resident 87) when: 1. The Level 1 PASARR was missing the diagnosis of bipolar (extreme mood swings). 2. The Level 1 PASARR included the diagnosis of dementia (memory loss). This failure had the potential for newly admitted residents to be admitted to the facility without knowing if they had a mental disorder or if the facility could provide services that met their needs. Findings: 1. A policy and procedure that outlined the admission PASARR process was requested and not provided. A review of the State Operations Manual, dated 8/8/24, indicated, the PASARR screening process was To ensure each resident in a nursing facility is screened for a mental disorder (MD) or intellectual…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-18 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement an individualized patient-centered care plan for one of twenty-nine sampled residents (Resident 288) when: a care plan was not developed for significant weight loss for Resident 288. As a result, Resident 288, who was identified as malnourished at admission, had a weight loss of 11 pounds or 6.24 % in 2 weeks. This failure had the potential to contribute to the risk of further weight loss and decline for Resident 288. Findings: During a review of Resident 288's clinical record, indicated she was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident 288 had been in and out of the acute hospital and readmitted back to the facility from times to times in between 8/5/23 to 11/9/24. The most recent re-admission date to the facility was 11/9/24, the admission diagnoses included disruption of external operation (surgical) wound, difficulty in walking, and severe protein-calorie malnutrition (diagnosed on [DATE]). Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-18 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide one out of 32 sampled residents (Resident 73) with professional standards of care when Licensed Nurses (LN) utilized a DeClogger (a long, thin, flexible, piece of plastic with a jagged end that was used to de-clog peg-tubes) on Resident 73's peg-tube (a tube that was inserted into the abdomen and delivered liquid nutrition directly into the stomach). There was no Physician's order, no monitor in place that tracked how often LN utilized the DeClogger, and there was no care plan (a document that described the care a resident needed and how that care would be provided). This failure had the potential for peg-tube malfunctions to go unnoticed and could lead to a decline in resident health status. Findings: A policy and procedure (P&P) regarding peg-tube care was requested and not provided. The P&Ps that were provided related to administering medications and feeding via the feeding tube. A review of the Job Description for LVN, dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-18 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure appropriate care was provided to prevent urinary tract infections (UTI's, a clinically detectable condition associated with invasion by disease causing microorganisms [germ] of some part of the urinary tract) for one of 29 sampled residents (Resident 44) when Certified Nursing Assistances did not do complete and proper peri-care (the process of washing the genital and anal areas) after incontinent episodes. This deficient practice had the potential to cause UTI's for incontinent residents and a decline in health status. A review of Resident 44's admission Record (undated) indicated Resident 44 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Sepsis (serious infection) due to Escherichia Coli (E-Coli, a microorganism [germ] found in the bowel[stool] and commonly causes UTI's), urinary tract infection, chest pain, Parkinson's (a progressive disorder that affects the nervous system and causes tremors, stiffness and slowing of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-18 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain the nutritional status for one of three sampled residents (Resident 288), when Resident 288 had insidious weight loss within a month timeframe (from 11/19/24 to 12/3/24). The weight loss was not identified, and intervention was not implemented. As a result, Resident 288, who was identified as malnourished at admission, had a weight loss of 11 pounds or 6.24 % in 2 weeks. This failure had the potential to contribute to the risk of further weight loss and decline for Resident 288. Findings: During a review of the facility's policy titled, Weight Policy, no revised date provided, indicated, The nursing center utilizes weights as one component of data collection needed to evaluate resident's nutritional status, fluid retention or diuresis. The process, included: a. Weight criteria - New admission: weight resident within 24 hours of admission then weekly for one month; hospital weights are not used as nursing center weights. b.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-18 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide necessary monitoring for one out of two sampled residents (Resident 87) while on an antipsychotic (a medication that altered the brain, caused a change in mood, awareness, thought, feelings, or behaviors) medication when: 1. Resident 87 was prescribed Asenapine (an antipsychotic medication that can be used to treat bipolar [a serious mental illness that caused mood swings] disorder) Transdermal Patch (a patched that was placed on the skin) and there was no monitor in place that tracked specific behaviors for the use of Asenapine. 2. Resident 87 was prescribed Haloperidol (Haldol, an antipsychotic medication that can be used to treat bipolar disorder) and there were no monitors in place that assessed for adverse reactions (side effects that could be serious or dangerous). These failures had the potential for serious or dangerous medication side effects to go unnoticed and could cause a decline in Resident 87's physical, mental, and psychosocial…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-18 · tag F0801 — isolatedEmploy sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure the Registered Dietitian (RD) and Dietary Services Manager (DSM) provided adequate oversight of the Food and Nutrition Services (FNS) when 1. The RD did not provide evidence of regularly scheduled consultation and audits of the kitchen. 2. Effective systems and monitoring were not in place to ensure sanitation of the kitchen, food cooling, the consistency of pureed foods on tray line, and management of dented cans. 3. The facility accepted residents with requirements for Vegetarian diet, the RD and DSM reported the four-week vegetarian menu cycle and cook's spreadsheets had been in place for a while, but kitchen staff were not aware of a pre-planned vegetarian menu and did not follow it. These failures had the potential to result in foodborne illness and decline for residents consuming food from the facility. 1. RD Oversight of the Kitchen During an interview with the RD on 12/16/24 at 1:05 pm, she stated she had worked at the facility full time, 40 hours per week, for 12 years. Recently their part-time…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-18 · tag F0847 — isolatedInform resident or representatives choice to enter into binding arbitration agreement and right to refuse.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to explain the terms of the arbitration agreement (arbitration: a private process where disputing parties agree that one or several other individuals can make a decision about the dispute after receiving evidence and hearing arguments.) to the resident in a language that the resident understood for one of five sampled residents (Resident 283). This failure resulted in Resident 283 signing a document that she did not understand and had the potential to result in Resident 283 to not be able to make an informed decision and/or her rights to be denied. Findings: During a review of Resident 283's clinical record, indicated that Resident 283 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included left knee osteoarthritis (a progressive disorder of the joints, caused by a gradual loss of cartilage), and Artificial left knee joint. Resident 283's primary language is Spanish, and she is her own Responsible party (RP) and capable of making her own…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-31 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure pain medication was administered, in accordance with the resident ' s comprehensive care plan, and the resident ' s goals for care and preferences for one of three residents (Resident 1) who were sampled for pain management. This failure caused Resident 1 to experience increased pain and discomfort with the potential to experience a decline in her health condition. Findings: The facility ' s policy titled Pain Policy undated, indicated The Center [facility] evaluates for, and attempts to manage/minimize, pain in residents. The facility ' s policy titled Medication Administration undated, indicated Medications are administered in accordance with written orders of the prescriber [Physician]. Medications are to be administered within 60 minutes of scheduled time A review of Resident 1 ' s undated Face Sheet indicated that Resident 1 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including a broken leg, muscle weakness, lung disease, and pain. A review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-15 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on in interview and record review the facility failed to provide residents food that is palatable (tasty, and flavorful) .,and an appetizing temperature for 12 of 23 residents (Residents: 101, 289, 57, 94, 66, 231, 230, 100, 52, 20, 44, 41) when residents complained of food regularly not tasting good and being cold. This failure had the potential to result in residents not obtaining appropriate nutritive intake, precarious weight loss, increased health complications, and diminished emotional well-being. Findings: A review of Resident 101's medical record indicated that resident 101 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included, Acute Respiratory Failure (fluid builds up n lungs due to disease or injury that interferes with the lungs ability to deliver oxygen or remove carbon dioxide), Chronic Atrial Fibrillation (Irregular and often very rapid heart rhythm), Unspecified Protein- Calorie Malnutrition (nutritional status with reduced availability of nutrients). During an interview on 2/12/24 at 12:33…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-15 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews the facility failed to notify the provider with the need to review and update the pain treatment plan for 1 of 5 residents (Resident 231), when Resident 231 had continuous pain at levels that indicated pain was not managed by the regimen ordered. This failure had the potential to result in decline of mobility, increased health complications, and diminished emotional well-being. Findings: A review of Resident 231's medical record indicated that resident 231 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included, status post (s/p) fall, Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA)(hip fracture resulting in hip replacement via surgical procedure), Removal of internal fixation device (removal of hip hardware via surgical procedure), sepsis (serious condition in which the body responds improperly to an infection, causing organs to work poorly). During a review of Medication Administration Record (MAR), dated 2/1/24 to 2/29/24, the MAR indicated, Rate pain every shift (Q-shift): Mild Pain 1-3,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-15 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that resident's pain was managed for 1 of 5 residents (Resident 231) when resident 231 Consistently reported pain levels of 4-9 regularly to staff, both prior to, and following pain medication administration, and new orders were not obtained for a more tolerable pain management regimen. This failure had the potential to result in a decline in mobility, increased health complications, and diminished emotional well-being. Findings: A review of Resident 231's medical record indicated that resident 231 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included, status post (s/p) fall, Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA)(hip fracture resulting in hip replacement via surgical procedure), Removal of internal fixation device (removal of hip hardware via surgical procedure), sepsis (serious condition in which the body responds improperly to an infection, causing organs to work poorly). During a review of Medication Administration Record (MAR), dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-15 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure infection control techniques were implemented when: 1. a vial of blood glucose test strips, that multiple residents use, was brought into Resident 94's room and was left uncapped and placed next to the used, blood-contaminated Glucometer (a device that uses an inserted test strip containing a small amount of blood applied to measure Blood Sugar levels) after testing Resident 94's blood sugar. 2. a used lancet (a small, sterile single-use needle used to draw a drop of blood for testing, as with a glucometer) was wrapped inside a used glove and placed in a trash can that was inside Resident's room. These failures had the potential for cross-contamination, needlestick injuries, and infection to occur. During a review of Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)'S Infection Safety guideline, titled Infection Prevention During Blood Glucose Monitoring and Insulin Administration, reviewed 3/2/2011, indicated: 1. An underappreciated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-09 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation and record Review, this requirement was not met when staff caused pain and redness to a resident ' s foot, resulting in a delay in the progress toward his rehabilitation goals. Findings: A review of the Clinical Record indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] for rehabilitation of worsening contractures (rigidity, shortening and hardening of the muscles and tendons) in his feet; Resident 1 was wheelchair bound. Review of Resident 1 ' s Minimum Data Set (MDS) Section G, Functional Status, dated 9/7/23, indicated that Resident 1 required Extensive Assistance for transferring from one surface to another, moving side to side in bed, toilet use, and dressing. Review of the facility ' s record titled Physical Therapy Evaluation and Plan of Treatment dated 9/4/23 indicated, Patient admitted to [a nearby hospital] for evaluation and now being seen here secondary to significant loss of function with both lower extremities exhibiting extensor tone [spasticity of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$45,500 in federal fines across 1 penalty. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.
- $45,500 — penalty dated 2024-07-23
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-08-20 for 21 days
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| WENTZ, ROBERT | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 03/01/2004 |
| BAZZANI, MATTHEW | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | since 05/27/2014 |
| DUNCAN, COLLEEN | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | since 01/31/2020 |
| SHANNON, ROY | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | since 06/27/2014 |
| OROVILLE HOSPITAL | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/01/2019 |
| SEAMAN, LAURENCE | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 06/27/2014 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 11 rows in the source record cover these 6 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
What families pay in CA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 555281. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-05-08, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.