Maywood Acres Healthcare
2641 South C Street, Oxnard, CA 93033 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 98 certified beds · (805) 487-7840 Medicare & Medicaid certified
On the public record, this home looks stronger than most — but visit before you decide.
- a strong health-inspection score (5/5) — the hardest rating to game (though it’s ranked within its own state, not nationally)
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
- lower-than-typical staff turnover (29% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- a high number of inspection citations overall (30) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 5 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 4 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 5 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 5 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 4 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 4 to 5 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 10.7% | 10.2% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 4.0% | 4.0% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.8% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 1.1% | 1.2% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 0.0% | 7.3% | 6.5% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.4% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 1.3% | 1.6% | 3.3% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 5.7% | 9.8% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 17.1% | 13.7% | 18.9% | typical |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 98.2% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 3.5% | 4.3% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 7.3% | 10.2% | 21.2% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 17.9% | 12.0% | 17.1% | typical |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 1.9% | 1.5% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 99.2% | 93.2% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 15.7% | 23.0% | 22.6% | better |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 8.5% | 11.2% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.78 | 2.25 | 1.67 | typical |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 0.61 | 1.57 | 1.80 | better |
* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
44.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 186 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 43.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 107 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.35 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 60% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 16% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 44.7%CMS range 38.3–53.1 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 11.9%CMS range 9.6–14.8 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 43.9% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 41.1% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 35.5% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 99.3% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 100.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 1.4% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 8.3%CMS range 5.4–11.8 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.95 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 98 beds and averages 99.1 residents a day — about 101% occupied, or roughly -1 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.57 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.51 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.42 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.41 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.64 on weekdays — 6% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.57 to 0.37 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 29% is below the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
30 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 20 are one tap away and print in full.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-13 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolatedHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to implement their policy and procedure related to grievance and complaints for one of two sampled residents (Resident 1) when there was no documentation of Resident 1's concerns and the action/resolution taken by the facility.This failure had the potential to overlook Resident 1's concerns that could result in the violation of resident rights. During a record review of Resident 1's clinical records, the admission record indicated Resident 1 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included weakness and vascular dementia (reduced blood flow to the brain and often affects person's ability to plan, organize or make decisions). Cognitive assessment indicated intact cognition, however, there are behavioral symptoms manifested by verbal aggression directed at others, refusing care that occur one to three days. Functional ability assessment indicated Resident 1 needs maximal assistance on toileting and dependent on showering. During a concurrent…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-29 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set (MDS - a standardized assessment and care-screening tool) accurately reflected the dialysis (medical procedure where the blood is circulated directly through a dialysis machine that uses special filters to remove waste products and excess fluid from the blood) status of one of 24 sampled residents (Resident 1). This failure had the potential for Resident 1 to not received needed services. During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated, Resident 1 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included, end stage renal disease (a condition where the kidneys have permanently lost most of their function and can no longer adequately filter waste products and excess fluid from the blood) and dependence on renal dialysis. During a review of Resident 1's Order Summary Report (OSR), dated 8/28/25, the OSR indicated, Hemodialysis every Monday, Wednesday, and Friday with an order date of 6/27/25. During a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-29 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — isolatedProvide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow its policy and procedure when a care plan was not created for 1 of 24 sampled residents (Resident 61) with Dementia (a general term describing a group of conditions that cause a progressive decline in cognitive abilities).This failure had the potential for resident to not receive appropriate care and treatment to attain highest practicable psychosocial well-being. During a concurrent observation and interview on 8/26/25 at 2:45 p.m. with Resident 61, Resident 61 was unable to state the current year, month, or date. Resident 61 was observed in bed and stated he was waiting for a certified nursing assistant (CNA) to shave him, pointing to his face and chin. During a review of Resident 61's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated, Resident 61 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including, Alzheimer's disease (a type of dementia, a condition that causes a progressive decline in cognitive abilities, such as memory,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-29 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to write the open date on the pharmacy sticker for Resident 61's respiratory solution vials located in Medication Cart #3.This failure resulted in the potential for Resident 61 to receive a medication that had been expired or no longer effective, placing Resident 61 at risk for decreased therapeutic benefit and potential adverse health outcome. Findings: During an observation on [DATE] at 12:07 p.m. of Medication Cart #3, an open medication box labeled 'Ipratropium Bromide 0.5 milligrams (mg)/Albuterol Sulfate 3mg' (an inhaled combination medication that contains two different bronchodilators to open the airways and make breathing easier) was noted in the bottom right-hand drawer of Medication Cart #3. Inside the box was an open foil package containing three (3) respiratory solution vials. Neither the foil package nor the box displayed a documented date of opening. During a record review of the pharmacy's expiration instructions located on the medication…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-29 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to implement infection prevention and control practices when: 1. A nasal canula (NC) was found on the floor for one of nine residents (Resident 38). This failure had the potential for Resident 38 to acquire an infection from an unclean NC.2. Staff did not perform appropriate hand hygiene practices in the dining room during meal tray service. This failure had the potential to expose residents to cross infection contaminations.Findings: 1.During an observation on 8/27/25 at 2:39 p.m. inside Resident 38's room, a nasal canula (NC) was noted draped over the bed rail and touching the floor. The tubing was dated 8/24/25. During a concurrent observation and interview on 8/28/25 at 8:23 a.m. with Licensed Nurse (LN 5) in Resident 38's room, Resident 38 was observed with ongoing oxygen via nasal cannula. The nasal cannula tubing was dated 8/24/25. The nasal cannula was the same as noted on the floor on 8/27/25. LN 5 confirmed the oxygen tubing Resident 38 was using was the same NC observed on 8/27/25 touching the floor.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-29 · tag F0926 — failed to keep the home smoke-free / fire-safe — isolatedHave policies on smoking.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement their policy and procedure on smoking.This failure had the potential to result in serious risk of fires and injuries for vulnerable residents with cognitive and physical impairments.Findings:During a concurrent observation and interview on 8/27/25 at 9:30 a.m. with the IPN, a resident on a wheelchair self-propelled towards the nursing station and left a cigarette lighter on the nursing station counter for approximately three minutes without any staff noticing the cigarette lighter. The IPN took the cigarette lighter and stated was going to keep it for safe keeping. IPN also stated only alert residents are allowed to to keep smoking materials.During a review of the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Smoking Policy and Procedure, [undated], the P&P indicated, 2. Smoking materials/paraphernalia such as cigarettes, cigars, lighters, etc. shall be kept in a locked container for safe keeping. No resident shall be allowed to keep their own smoking materials/paraphernalia for safety purposes.
- Potential for harm · E2024-08-22 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — patternKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to: 1. Ensure the door for one of one walk-in refrigerators in the kitchen was maintained in safe, operating condition when the door would not remain closed after being pushed shut. As a result, temperature abuse (lack of adherence to strict temperature control) could occur which could lead to food spoilage and/or growth of pathogens that placed the residents at an increased risk for foodborne illness. 2. Ensure there was an appropriate air gap between the dish machine drain and the floor sink drain to prevent contaminated water from backing up into the dish machine should a problem arise with the floor drain. Findings: 1. During a concurrent observation and interview on 08/19/24 at 8:59 a.m. with Registered Dietitian (RD) in the kitchen, inside a walk-in refrigerator was a large wall thermometer, and RD stated, it read 50 degrees F (Fahrenheit). During a concurrent observation and interview on 8/19/24 at 8:41 a.m. with RD and dietary aide (DA) 1, the RD obtained an individual sized milk carton from the walk-in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-22 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the policy on checking resident room temperatures was implemented for three of nine sampled residents (Resident 45, 50 and 78). This failure placed residents at risk to have an environment were the room temperatures were not regulatred and folloiwed for a comfortable daily living . Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 8/19/24, at 10:28 a.m., in room [ROOM NUMBER], Resident 50 was observed lying in bed with no clothes on and a bed sheet that covered the legs. Resident 50 stated, It's too hot in here. I don't want to wear any clothes. During a concurrent observation and interview on 8/19/24, at 03:37 p.m., in room [ROOM NUMBER], Resident 78 had two small fans blowing towards her. Resident 78 stated, It gets hot in here, so I have two fans to blow air on me and I still get hot because it's just hot air blowing on me. During a concurrent observation and interview on 8/20/24, at 09:55 a.m., in room [ROOM NUMBER],…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-22 · tag F0636 — isolatedAssess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to complete a CMS (Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) required discharged Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool and plan of care for residents in a nursing facility) assessment for one discharged resident (Resident 74). This failure resulted in an MDS discharge assessment not completed timely. Findings: During a review of the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment Schedule, dated May 2016, the P&P indicated in part, The facility shall adhere to Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) Manual Assessment schedules as required by federal and state agencies .Resident Assessment Coordinator (RAC) is an RN (Registered Nurse) who is responsible for the effective and efficient interdisciplinary care coordination .and completion of a comprehensive plan of care from admission to discharge . During a review of Resident 74's admission Record (AR), dated 8/21/24, the AR indicated, Resident 74 was admitted to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-22 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure an accurate assessment, reflective of the resident's status at the time of the assessment, was done for one of five (Resident 86) sampled residents. This failure resulted in an inaccurate assessment and had the potential to result in life threatening consequences for Resident 86. Findings: During an observation on 8/19/24, at 9:12 a.m., in room [ROOM NUMBER], Resident 86 was observed in bed, watching TV. Resident 86's left upper arm had an AV shunt (Arteriovenous [AV] shunt or fistula is a surgically created connection between an artery and a vein for dialysis [a medical procedure that removes waste and excess fluid from the blood when the kidneys are unable to do so] access/use). The left upper arm AV shunt/fistula was clean, had thrill (vibration/pulse caused by blood flowing through the shunt/fistula), skin over the AV shunt/fistula was clean and well moisturized. Resident 86 stated, I go for dialysis every Monday, Wednesday,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 20 citations
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-22 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to develop a care plan for three of three residents (Resident 49, 86 and 54) related to: 1. A pad alarm that was considered as a restraint for Residents 49 and 86 2. A diagnosis of Hepatitis C (a liver disease caused by the hepatitis C virus, which is primarily transmitted through exposure to infectious blood or body fluids that contain blood) for Resident 54. These failures had the potential for Resident 49, 86 and 54 not to receive the appropriate care and services, based on problem areas identified. Findings: 1. During an observation on 8/19/24 at 9:18 a.m. and at 9:28 a.m., in Resident 86 and Resident 49 rooms respectively (room [ROOM NUMBER] B and room [ROOM NUMBER] A). Resident 86 was observed in bed, watching TV with a pad alarm (a pressure sensitive pad positioned beneath resident attached to a control unit that emits a loud alarm) attached to a control unit on the bed. Resident 49 was observed seated on a wheelchair, with a pad alarm…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-22 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolatedEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure nursing staff demonstrated competency in medication administration when: 1. A licensed vocational nurse (LVN) 1 administered the wrong laxative (medication that treats constipation) to one unsampled resident (Resident 53). 2. Blood pressure and heart rate readings were not accurately documented for one of five sampled residents (Resident 68) prior to receiving the medication Carvedilol (medication to treat heart failure and high blood pressure after a heart attack). 3. Monitoring for medication side effects and bleeding complications was not implemented for one of five sampled residents (Resident 344) receiving the medication Apixaban (medication that prevents blood clots). These failures had the potential to harm these residents as a result of unsafe medication administration. Findings: 1. During a review of Resident 53's admission Record (AR), dated 8/21/24, the AR indicated in part, Resident 53 was an [AGE] year-old male, who…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-22 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure monitoring for side effects and manifestation of behaviors was done for Mirtazapine (a drug used to treat depression) for one Resident (Resident 54). This failure had the potential for unrecognized side effects of the Mirtazapine and occurrence of manifested of behaviors. Findings: During a review of the admission Record (AR) of Resident 54, the AR indicated a diagnosis of Major Depressive Disorder (a serious mental disorder that affects how a person feels, thinks, and act). During a review of the Order Summary Report (OSR) dated 8/20/24 for Resident 54, the OSR indicated in part, Mirtazapine Oral Tablet was prescribed on 4/24/24 for Depression manifested by lack of interest in food. During a review of the Resident 54's care plans dated 5/2/24, this indicated in part, interventions monitor for occurrences of depressive behavior every shift and update MD as needed and monitor/document side effects and effectiveness every shift. During a review of Resident 54's Medication Administration Record (MAR), for the month of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-22 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolatedEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure two of two sampled resident's (Resident 19, Resident 1) therapeutic mechanical soft, chopped diet order was plated correctly in the kitchen in accordance with the physician's order and facility's planned menu/diet manual. As a result, of not implementing the chopped diet safely residents were at an increased risk of choking. Findings: 1. During a concurrent observation and interview on 8/19/24 at 11:12 a.m. with Registered Dietitian (RD), Resident 19's lunch meal was plated with chopped pieces of baked chicken that appeared larger than 1/2 [half inch] in size. Resident 19's lunch meal tray ticket indicated mechanical soft, chopped, renal [diet for kidney disease] diet order. Resident 19's meal tray was observed placed on the meal delivery cart for distribution by dietary aide (DA) 3. RD was asked to remove Resident 19's meal tray from the meal delivery cart and check it for accuracy. RD observed the size of the pieces of chopped chicken, and RD stated, The chopped diet is okay. RD was asked to review…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-22 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolatedEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident's lunch was served in an attractive manner when the food items on the plate were similar color (brown) and the noodles were mushy when the food was hot held for a prolonged period of time prior to the lunch meal service. Three residents expressed dissatisfaction with the facility's food during the survey(Resident 48, Resident 43, Resident 2). As a result, hot holding food for a prolonged period of time was not a method of food preparation that conserves nutritive value or appearance. In addition, food that was served lacked a variety of color creating an unappetizing appearance and could cause less food intake and weight loss. Findings: .During a concurrent observation and interview on 8/19/24 at 08:37 a.m. with [NAME] 1 upon entrance into the kitchen to begin survey, steamtable was observed empty as breakfast meal had been completed. [NAME] 1 was observed cooking at the stove range, and [NAME] 1 stated she was preparing lunch for residents. During a concurrent observation and interview on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-03 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to demonstrate it notified a physician of a change in condition in a timely manner and per policy and procedure, for one of two sampled residents (Resident 1). This facility failure had the potential for emergency medical care to be delayed for Resident 1. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's Change In Condition form dated 6/7/24, indicated in part, Resident 1 had a change in condition when experiencing Hypoxia (a potentially life-threatening situation which results in low levels of oxygen in a person's tissues and cells) during PT (physical therapy). The Change In Condition form indicated this event started on 6/7/24, in the morning. The Change In Condition form indicated in part Resident (Resident 1) noted with hypoxia and diaphoresis (excessive sweating) during PT, resident (Resident 1) was fluctuating between 88%-95% RA (room air). Resident (Resident 1) moaning when transferred back to bed. The Change In Condition form indicated in part Resident 1's physician was notified at 12:00 p.m. on 6/7/24 of Resident 1's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-28 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to follow their policy and procedures pertaining to Residents going out on a leave of absence, for two of two sampled Residents (Resident 1 and Resident 2). This failure had the potential for the facility not to know where residents were going, while out on pass from the facility or when they returned. Findings: During a review of the facility's policy and procedure titled POLICY AND PROCEDURE FOR RESIDENT'S LEAVE OF ABSENCE/OUT ON PASS dated 3/13/24, indicated in part Residents before leaving the facility shall fill out the Release of Responsibility for Leave of Absence Form. This form shall record the name/signature of the person accompanying the resident. If self-responsible, resident will sign out for himself. The time the resident left the facility and the place/location the resident is going to must also be written in the form. Once the resident is back, License nurse or facility representative shall confirm that the resident came back by filling out the time they came back and by placing his/her signature. During a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-03 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure turning and repositioning as stated in the resident's care plan for one of three sampled residents (Resident 2) was documented to reflect the care plan was implemented. This failure had the potential for pressure ulcer development or skin breakage on the resident. Findings: During a review of Resident 2's admission Record, dated 5/12/22, the admission Record indicated, upon admission to the facility, Resident 2 had a diagnosis of dementia (memory loss that disrupts daily life). During a review of Resident 2's Care Plan, dated 4/20/23, the Care Plan indicated, Resident 2 had a problem with actual pressure ulcer (injury to skin and underlying tissue resulting from prolonged pressure on the skin) related to right heel, with a facility intervention of Turn and repositioning (moving a resident into a different position to redistribute pressure from a particular part of the body) at least q (every) 2-3 hours . During a review of Resident 2's Wound Evaluation and Treatment Progress Notes, dated 4/13/23, 4/20/23, 4/27/23,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2021-07-30 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the ice machine was sanitized according to manufacturer's guidelines. This failure have the potential to placed the residents at risk for gastrointestinal illnesses and other water borned illnesses. Findings: During a concurrent observation, and interview on 7/27/21, at 10:25 AM with Maintenance Supervisor (MS), in a room adjacent to the kitchen housing the facility's Ice Machine, the inside lower panel that goes over the Ice Machine bin was observed with white-colored substance and small, black-colored spots. The MS indicated the white spots were calcium deposit build-up, was unsure what the black spots were, but it can be wiped off. The MS further indicated an outside company cleans the Ice Machine and the MS was not sure when was the last time it was cleaned . The MS stated, I don't like to be in here when they spray. During a review of the facility's service agreement with the outside company, titled, Proposal, dated 8/20/19, indicated, . Scope of Work - bid price on the preventive maintenance on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2021-07-30 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — patternEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure care services provided to residents met professional standards when: 1. Pain medications given for three residents (Resident 34, 51, and 414) were not documented as administered on the facility's Medication Administration Record ( MAR). 2. The pre (before) and post (after) pain assessments for two residents (Resident 34 and 51) were not documented on the Pain Assessment Flow Sheet (PAFS) after pain medication administration. These failures had the potential to unknowingly administer additional doses of pain medications to residents resulting to double dosing which is a medication error. Findings: Review of [NAME] and [NAME], 6th Edition, Mosby's Fundamentals of Nursing, page 847 in the section titled, Medication Administration indicated, After administering a medication, the nurse records it immediately on the appropriate record form. The nurse never charts a medication before administering it. Recording immediately after administration prevents…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2021-07-30 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — patternProvide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure dietary staff had the competency and skills to keep and maintained food contact surfaces were sanitized effectively. This failure had the potential to spread food borne diseases to residents and occupants of the facility. Findings: During an observation and concurrent interview with the facility's [NAME] and Assistant [NAME] (AC), on 7/28/21 at 8:50 AM, the [NAME] and AC indicated food contact surface countertops were sanitized by using a cloth soaked in sanitizer from the red bucket (red container with sanitizing solution). The [NAME] return demonstrated the sanitizing process in the prsence of the facility's Registered Dietician (RD), Dietary Services Supervisor (DSS), Department's RD and surveyor by filing up the red bucket with sanitizing solution and checking the solution concentration (parts per million -PPM) with a chemistry test strip (CTS- [NAME] QAC 2951) via a colored coded graph chart (color indicates amount of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-07-30 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to clean glucometers (machine used to measure blood sugar) per manufacturer's instructions for use. This failure had the potential to result in cross contamination and spreading of infectious disease to the residents. Findings: Review of the manufacturer's instructions for use titled, Maintenance, undated indicated in part . it is ARKRAY's policy to advise healthcare professionals to clean and disinfect blood glucose meters between each resident test to avoid cross contamination issues . Cleaning and disinfecting can be completed by using a commercially available EPA-registered disinfectant detergent or germicide wipe . To use a wipe, remove from container and follow product label instructions to disinfect the meter. Review of the label for wipes, Sani-Cloth Bleach Germicidal, Disposable Wipe, undated indicated in part . Bactericidal, Fungicidal, Tuberculocidal, and Virucidal in 4 minutes . Disinfects in 4 minutes . 4 minute wet time. During an observation of Med Cart 1 and a concurrent interview with licensed nurse (LN 4) on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2021-07-30 · tag F0912 — patternProvide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, and interview, the facility had 31 resident rooms that do not meet the required square footage of 80 square feet per resident . These rooms are: Two resident rooms: (Required 160 square footage). rooms [ROOM NUMBERS] are 148 square footage. rooms [ROOM NUMBERS] are 139 square feet. Three resident rooms with three beds occupancy: (Required 240 square footage). Rooms 3, 4, - 217 square feet. Rooms 6,7,8,9 -212 square feet. Rooms 10,11,12 -221 square feet. Rooms 14,15 -221 square feet. Rooms 16,17 -218 square feet. Rooms 20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27 -224 square feet. Rooms 28,29 -234 square feet. Rooms 30,31,32,33 -215 square feet. Findings: Observations made during initial facility tour, on 7/27/2021 thru 7/30/2021, revealed the facility had 31 residents rooms (two to three residents per room) with less square footage than the required 80 square feet per resident. Observations revealed the 31 rooms had sufficient space in each room for the provision of nursing services, placement of resident's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-07-30 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a medical physician sign the Physicians Orders for Life-Sustaining Treament (POLST) for one of 18 sampled residents (Resident 54). This failure had the potential for life sustaining orders to be not authorized or authenticated by the resident's physician which can result in the delay of medical interventions during an emergency. Findings: During a review of the clinical record for Resident 54, the POLST dated 4/7/21 was not signed by the resident's physician . The facility policy and procedure titled Physicain's and Telephone orders dated 3/2/16 indicated, physicain's orders are to be counter signed within 5 days the order was received. During and interview on 7/28/2021 at 1 PM the medical records (MR) acknowledged the document was not signed by the physician.
- Potential for harm · D2021-07-30 · tag F0640 — isolatedEncode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a discharge Minimum Data Set (MD- assessment data of resident ) was timely done for one resident (Resident 1) This facility failure had the potential to result in wrong entry to the federal data base . Findings: Review of Resident 1's overall assessment history indicated a discharge occurence . During an interview and concurrent record review with licensed nurse (LN 6) on 07/30/21, at 02:54 PM, LN 6 stated Resident 1 was discharged home on 3/25/21 and it was a planned discharge. LN 6 further stated a planned discharged assessment should be opened on the last covered day of skilled services ( physical , occupational, and nursing). Further review of the clinical record of Resident 1, no discharge assessment dated [DATE] was noted on record review. LN 6 acknowledged she missed opening and closing the discharge MDS on time.
- Potential for harm · D2021-07-30 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident's careplan ( planned measures, interventions to direct care) was updated after a fall occurence for one out of 18 sampled residents (Resident 54). This failure has the potential for interventions and measures in place that won't be effective to prevent a fall recurrence . Findings: Review of the clinical record for Resident 54 indicated the resident had a fall incident on 6/7/21. The careplan in place for fall showed no review of interventions to address the fall on 6/7/21. During an interview on 7/27/2021 at 4 PM , licensed nurse (LN7) indicated she was on duty when the resident fell on 6/7/21. LN7 acknowledged Resident 54's care plan was not updated after the fall. The facility policy and procedure titled Fall Incidents Management and Prevention dated 4/22/15 indicates a care plan will be initiated or updated with interventions to prevent further falls.
- Potential for harm · D2021-07-30 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure consumption of therapeutic (to cure or restore to health) nutritional supplements was accurately documented and monitored in two of 18 sampled residents (Resident 6 and Resident 18). This failure had the potential to ineffectively evaluate and delay timely revision of interventions needed to meet residents' nutrition needs. Findings: 1. During a review of Resident 6's admission Record, with printed date of 7/27/21, indicated an admission date of 1/18/19, with medical diagnoses, including, Unspecified Sequelae of Other Cerebrovascular Disease (a range of conditions that affect the blood flow through the brain), Difficulty in Walking, Abnormal Posture, Essential Hypertension (high blood pressure), Allergic Rhinitis (an allergic reaction that causes sneezing, itchy and stuffy nose, and sore throat), Dry Eye Syndrome (a condition where the eyes don't make enough tears), History of Falling, and Personal History of COVID-19 (a severe, respiratory infection caused by the Corona Virus 2). During a review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-07-30 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and recored review the facility failed to ensure the use of PRN (as needed) psychotropic (medication that can affect a person's mental state) medication does not exceed 14 days for 2 out of 18 sampled residents ( Residents 23 and 60). This facility failure had the potential for unneccessary use of medication with no evaluation and assessment of need. Findings: During a review of the clinical record for Resident 23 indicated a physician order for PRN Temazepam 15 mg. one capsule at night (sleep aid) with a start of 5/21/2021. A pharmacist's recommendation located in the resident's clinical record dated 6/28/2021 indicated for facility to ask the physician to renew or discontinue the Temazepam order and document the rationale on the resident's clinical record. No documentation in the clinical record was located the resident's attending physician was contacted or notified of the pharmacist's recommendation dated 6/28/21. During an interview on 7/30/2021 at 3:30 PM the infection preventionist (IP) acknowledged no discontinue or renew orders from the physician was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-07-30 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of 18 sampled residents (Resident 13's), Foley catheter (FC) [a tube that drains urine from the bladder], was documented in the medical record. This failure resulted in inaccurate documentation that can affect the delivery of safe care and treatments. Findings : During a review of the facilities policy & procedure (P&P) titled, Completion and Correction of Resident Records, dated 2/25/2016, the P&P indicated, To ensure that medical records are complete and accurate .in part . Entries will be complete, legible, descriptive, and accurate. During an observation on 07/28/21, 9:19 a.m., in Resident 13' room, Resident 13 was sleeping, FC bag was attached to the bed. During a review of Resident 13's Medical Doctor's Orders (MDO), dated 7/29/21, the MDO indicated, an order for FC. During a concurrent interview and record review, on 07/29/21, at 3:02 p.m., with Licensed Nurse (LN) 2, Resident 13's Licensed Nurse Record Weekly Summary (LNRWS), dated 7/27/21, was reviewed. The LNRWS indicated, no…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-07-30 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide Pneumococcal (bacterial infection) immunizations for one resident (Resident 16). This facility failure had the potential to result in Resident 16 acquiring complications from Pneumococcal disease. Findings: Review of the facility policy and procedure titled, Influenza and Pneumonia Vaccinations, dated 10/1/2018, indicated in part . A physician's order for pneumococci shall be obtained .Nursing Care Duties (Licensed Nurse) Administer vaccination to resident. During an interview and concurrent record review on 07/30/21, at 10:22 AM, with the infection preventionist (IP), Resident 16's Pneumococcal Immunization informed consent dated 5/14/21 indicated Resident gave consent to get vaccine, IP confirmed to date Resident 16 has not received vaccine. IP stated, I admitted Resident 16 and haven't given vaccine I can't keep track. MD order was not obtained until today. During an interview with IP on 07/30/21, at 10:37 AM, IP confirmed the MD order should have been obtained and pneumococcal vaccine should have been given to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MILWOOD HEALTHCARE, INC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 11/01/2007 |
| BRION, ALGER | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE; CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 09/17/2007 |
| BRION, MARIA | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE; CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 09/17/2007 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 11 rows in the source record cover these 3 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $420K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in CA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 055597. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-08-29, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.