Desert Springs Post Acute
74-350 Country Club Drive, Palm Desert, CA 92260 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 178 certified beds · (760) 341-0261 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Jul 2026
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605, F0607, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has 4 actual-harm citations
- a high number of inspection citations overall (130) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $74,424 in federal fines (most recent 2024-05-16)
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 2 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 3 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 2 to 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 4.6% | 10.2% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 0.5% | 4.0% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 1.1% | 0.8% | 0.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.2% | 1.2% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 6.5% | 7.3% | 6.5% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.4% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 2.0% | 1.6% | 3.3% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 3.8% | 9.8% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 20.5% | 13.7% | 18.9% | typical |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 98.2% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 3.7% | 4.3% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 6.8% | 10.2% | 21.2% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 11.8% | 12.0% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.2% | 1.5% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 95.7% | 93.2% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 35.0% | 23.0% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 17.3% | 11.2% | 12.0% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.96 | 2.25 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 2.57 | 1.57 | 1.80 | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
49.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 82 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 58.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 119 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.54 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 84% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 22% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 49.5%CMS range 40.5–58.6 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.4%CMS range 6.3–14.7 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 58.0% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 48.7% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 42.9% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 100.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 92.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.8% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 10.4%CMS range 7.2–14.3 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | worse than U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.23 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 178 beds and averages 165.5 residents a day — about 93% occupied, or roughly 12 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.06 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.28 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.39 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.67 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.22 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.31 to 0.20 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 49% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
130 citations, most serious first. The 14 most serious are shown; the remaining 116 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · Gdisputed · IDR2026-07-01 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of three sampled residents (Resident 1), was free from sexual abuse when there were no interventions developed to protect Resident 1 after Resident 2 subjected the resident to sexual abuse on May 19, 2026. Resident 1 was witnessed by facility staff being kissed and inappropriately touched on the breast by Resident 2. In addition, the facility staff did not immediately intervene when Resident 1 was witnessed being kissed and sexually inappropriately touched by Resident 2. Resident 1 has dementia (a decline in mental abilities which affects memory, thinking, and social abilities), has severe cognitive impairment, and has history of wandering (act of walking, moving and traveling without a specific destination or fixed route, often in an aimless manner). This failure resulted in Resident 1 being sexually abused the second time at the facility by another male resident (Resident 3) on June 6, 2026. This failure had the substantial probability of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-07-15 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a two person assist and use a gait belt during transfer from a regular chair to a wheelchair for one of three sampled residents (Resident A). In addition, the facility failed to ensure the wheelchair's brake was functioning well during the transfer. These failures had resulted in a fall for Resident A, which led to the development of genu valgum (knock-knee - the knees angle in and touch each other when the legs are straightened) deformity. Findings: On June 25, 2024, at 11:55 a.m. during a concurrent observation and interview inside Resident A's room, Resident A was oberved in bed, with surgical incision on the right knee. Resident A stated she was having back pain since she fell a week ago. Resident A stated, she was not able to sleep that night of the fall due to pain. Resident A stated, the Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) who transferred her to the wheelchair, did not lock the brakes of the wheelchair, she fell and hit her…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-01-12 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide care and services in preventing development of pressure injury (skin or soft tissue injuries that form due to prolonged pressure exerted over specific areas of the body), for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1), as evidenced by the following: 1. There was no skin evaluation conducted when Resident 1 was admitted on [DATE], in accordance with the policy and procedure titled, Skin Management Guidelines, dated March 2022. 2. There was no interventions developed to address Resident 1's risk for pressure ulcer on admission. The resident was assessed to be at risk for developing pressure injury. 3. Treatments for Resident 1's pressure injury on the right and left heel; sacrococcygeal; and right buttocks identified on October 12, 2023, was not initiated until October 17, 2023 (5 days after the pressure injuries were identified). These failures resulted in Resident 1 developing a Stage 2 pressure injury(partial thickness skin loss with exposed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Hcited before2023-06-23 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — patternProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide consistent range of motion exercises for five of eight residents reviewed for limited range of motion (ROM - the full movement potential of a joint) (Residents 9, 36, 42, 45, and 52). The facility did not have a restorative nursing program (a program that promotes and maintains resident's function which would include passive range of motion exercises [stretching muscles, moving body part around the joint] and active range of motion exercises [performed solely by the resident, who moves the joint without assistance]) for the residents at the facility. This failure resulted for Residents 9, 36, 42, 45 to develop foot drop (difficulty lifting the front part of the foot) and contractures (a condition of shortening and hardening of muscles, tendons, or other tissue, often leading to deformity and rigidity of joints) and for Resident 52 to develop contractures of right wrist and spastic (stiff or tight muscles) right elbow. Findings: 1.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ddisputed · IDR2026-07-01 · tag F0745 — failed to provide medically-related social services — isolatedProvide medically-related social services to help each resident achieve the highest possible quality of life.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a referral was sent in a timely manner, to Resident 4's insurance company, for authorization to schedule an oncology appointment for thrombocytopenia (Low platelet count - fragments in the blood that form clots to prevent bleeding). This failure resulted in the delay of Resident 4 from seeing an Oncologist sooner to evaluate his diagnosis of thrombocytopenia. Findings: A review of Resident 4's Resident Information, indicated, resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included end stage kidney disease (ESRD-occurs when the kidneys are no longer able to carry out their daily functions, requiring either dialysis or transplantation to sustain life). A review of Resident 4's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS- a screening test used to evaluate a patient's basic cognitive function, memory, and orientation) indicated a score of 15 out of 15, cognitively intact. On April 18, 2026, at 3:44 p.m., during an interview, the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-24 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure a homelike environment was provided, for three of three residents reviewed (Residents 52, 53, and 20) when:1.Resident 52 consistently heard yelling or screaming from a confused resident in another room throughout the shift.This failure resulted in Resident 52 experiencing sleep disruption and increased noise levels affecting his immediate environment.2. Resident 53 was not assisted by staff to put away her personal belongings such as clothes and blanket found on the floor of the resident's room.This failure resulted in Resident 53's clothes and blanket left on the floor, creating clutter and making her room less comfortable and homelike; and3.Resident 20's personal credit card was not kept safe and accounted for.This failure resulted in Resident 20 losing his credit card and placed him at risk for financial abuse.Findings: 1.On April 20, 2026, at 11:15 a.m., an observation was conducted outside Resident 177's room. Resident 177…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-04-24 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — patternEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure professional standards of practice were followed for 21 out of 21 sampled residents (Resident 176, 164, 12, and 18 residents in 800 hallway), when: 1. For Resident 176, medications scheduled at 9 a.m. were administered outside the facility's medication administration timeframe. This failure had the potential for the medications to be ineffective;2. For Resident 176, Empagliflozin (generic for Jardiance, a medication used to treat heart failure [a chronic condition where the heart cannot pump blood efficiently enough to meet the body's oxygen needs] with or without type 2 diabetes mellitus [DM, a condition where the body has trouble regulating blood sugar levels]) was prescribed with an indication for diabetes mellitus despite no documented diagnosis of diabetes, resulting in an incorrect medication indication. This failure had the potential for Resident 176 to receive unnecessary medication;3. For Resident 164, required…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-24 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — patternProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure dialysis (the process of removing waste products and excess fluid from the body when the kidneys are not able to adequately filter the blood) services where consistent with professional standards of practice and facility's policy and procedure, for two of five residents reviewed for dialysis (Residents 16 and 137), when:1a. For Resident 16, the dialysis access site was not assessed and maintained. This failure had the potential to result in infection, including bloodstream infection, increased pain, and further decline in the president's health condition.1b. For Resident 16, received more than his physician prescribed 1500 milliliters (ml- a unit of measurement) of fluids per day. This failure placed Resident 16's care needs to go unmet and had the potential to result in fluid overload. 2. For Resident 137, there was no coordination between the facility and the dialysis clinic to address the resident's refusal to go to dialysis…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-24 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — patternProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure sufficient staff were provided to meet the needs of the residents when the facility did not meet the required minimum of actual total Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) Direct Care Hours Per Patient Day (DHPPD - measure the numbers of hours of direct care given to residents in skilled nursing facility) of 2.4 hours for the months of November 2025, December 2025, January 2026, February 2026, March 2026, and April 2026.The failure to maintain the required minimum CNA DHPPD hours had the potential to place residents at risk for unmet needs, compromised safety, and decreased quality of care. Findings:On April 24, 2026, at 2:30 p.m., during an interview with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 14, CNA 14 stated there were days when there were not enough staff to take care of the residents on the weekends and residents may be calling for assistance for extended period of time which may lead to residents' needs not being met. CNA 14 stated she was responsible to provide care to 13 residents during the morning shift, specially…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-24 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe and effective pharmaceutical services were provided to meet the needs of the residents, for four of 13 residents reviewed (Residents 16, 17, 88, and 146), when:1. For Resident 16, the staff did not follow the physician's order when calcium acetate (medication to treat hyperphosphatemia [high phosphate levels] in patients with end-stage kidney disease) was not given with meals.This failure had the potential to reduce its effectiveness as a phosphate binder, placing the resident at risk for elevated phosphorus levels and related complications.2. For Resident 17, a blood pressure medication with holding parameters was not administered in accordance with the physician's order.This failure had the potential to significantly lower blood pressure and could cause dizziness, confusion, fainting, and a fall.3. For two out of 11 randomly selected residents (Resident 88 and 146), documentation on the Controlled Drug Records (CDR - a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-24 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — patternEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were administered in accordance with physician orders and the facility's policies and procedures, when a medication error rate of 16.13% (five medication errors out of 31 opportunities) was identified during medication pass observations, for two of five residents (Residents 17 and 176), when:1.For Resident 176, medications ordered to administer with food were not followed according to the physician's order and manufacturer's guidelines for administration. In addition, medications were administered outside of administration timeframe; and2.For Resident 17, Vitamin D was not administered according to the physician's order. In addition, Resident 17 was not instructed to rinse mouth after administration of an inhalation medication, according to the physician's order and manufacturer's guideline.These failures had the potential to compromise medication therapy, reduce therapeutic effectiveness, and increase the risk of adverse effects, including gastrointestinal irritation and oral candidiasis…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-24 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure proper storage and labeling of medications in accordance with the facility policy and procedures and the manufacturer's specifications when:1. An opened and uncapped ophthalmic (eye) medication for Resident 103 was stored without an opened date, with the dropper tip covered by tissue, in one of two reviewed medication rooms (Oasis Medication Room);2. Discontinued medications, including controlled substances (CS - medications with potential for abuse and dependence), for Residents 63 and 153 were stored in two of four reviewed medication carts (Dunes and Oasis Medication Carts); and3. Expired house supply medication and inhalers for Residents 140 and 145 were stored with active medications in two of four reviewed medication carts (Oasis and MedBridge Medication Carts).These failures had the potential for residents to receive deteriorated, discontinued, expired, or ineffective medication, which could result in medication errors and compromised treatment outcomes.Findings:1. On April 21, 2026, at 10:08…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-24 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — patternEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a physician-prescribed fortified diet (diet with added extra nutrients to increase the calories and/or protein density to promote improvement in residents' nutrition status) was provided, for four of four sampled residents (Residents 26, 84, 64, and 114) during lunch on April 20, 2026.This failure had the potential to have a negative impact on the residents' nutritional status and further compromise residents' medical status. Findings:On April 20, 2026, at 10:29 a.m., the undated Fortified diet Spreadsheet (the document used to guide dietary staff adding extra calories on food items) was reviewed in the facility kitchen. The Fortified Spreadsheets indicated, Monday Lunch: Hamburger:1 oz extra gravy; Wheat Roll: Extra 1/2 oz melted margarine.On April 20, 2026, at 12:16 p.m., a concurrent observation, interview, and review of Resident 64's meal ticket (contain Resident name and physician diet order) were conducted with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 16 at Dunes dining room. CNA 16 read Resident 64's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-24 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow its policy on Meal Service to provide appetizing food at appropriate temperatures according to residents' preferences, for five of 163 sampled residents (Residents 5, 17, 21, 52, and 54). In addition, meal trays were not served timely.These failures placed residents at potential risk for decrease nutritional intake which may affect the residents' overall nutrition status.Findings: A review of the facility Resident council minutes on January 13, 2026, indicated, Nursing: Concerns: Nursing not serving meals timely.On April 20, 2026, at 3:55 p.m., an interview was conducted with Resident 52. Resident 52 stated, Lunch is 11:00 a.m. but do not get meal tray until 11:30 a.m. or later.On April 21, 2026, at 9:03 a.m., an interview was conducted with Resident 21. Resident 21 stated, All served meals are cold.On April 21, 2026, at 9:06 a.m., an interview was conducted with Resident 5. Resident 5 stated, Served foods are cold; always missing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 116 citations
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-24 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe and sanitary food preparation and storage practices in the kitchen, for 163 out of 163 sampled residents who received foods from the kitchen, when:1. A Dietary Aide did not clean dirty meal carts per facility policy and procedure;2. Calcium buildup found on hot waterspouts in the kitchen;3. Two expired sandwiches found stored inside the nourishment refrigerator;4. Dust observed on several pieces of equipment and area in the kitchen; and5. Chipped paint was observed on the water drain found under the 3-compartment sinks.These failures had the potential to result in cross contamination (bacteria are unintentionally transferred from one substance or object to another with harmful effect) and foodborne illnesses (are illnesses that result from ingesting contaminated foods). Findings: 1. On April 21, 2026, at 9:33 a.m., a concurrent observation and interview were conducted with Dietary Aide (DA) 1 in dishwashing area. DA 1 was observed using detergent to wash the dirty meal carts and then sanitized…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-24 · tag F0554 — isolatedAllow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure an assessment and/or an evaluation for self-administration of medication was completed, for one of 173 residents reviewed for self-administration assessment (Resident 141), when eye drop medications were found at bedside, readily available for use.This failure places Resident 141 at risk for unsafe self-administration of medications and not monitored for potential side effects and drug interactions.Findings:On April 21, 2026, at 12:04 p.m., an observation with a concurrent interview was conducted with Resident 141. Resident 141 was observed in bed, alert, and interviewable. Resident 141's bedside table was observed to have a small box of eye medication labeled as Sodium Chloride Hypertonicity Solution 5% (a sterile, over-the-counter drop used to temporarily relieve corneal edema (swelling of the eye's transparent outer layer due to fluid buildup) by drawing excess water out of the cornea) 15 ml (millimeter - unit of measurement)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-24 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolatedPrevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from unnecessary psychotropic (drug that affects brain activities associated with mental processes and behaviors) medications, for one of five resident reviewed for unnecessary medications (Resident 18), when there was no documented evidence non-pharmacological interventions (NPIs) were attempted, implemented, monitored, or documented as clinically contraindicated. These failures had the potential to place the resident at risk of unnecessary psychotropic medication use and adverse side effects, including sedation and falls.Findings:1. On April 22, 2026, a review of Resident 18's admission Record, indicated Resident 18 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including unspecified psychosis (a psychotic disorder characterized by a loss of contact with reality), schizoaffective disorder (a chronic mental illness characterized by dramatic changes in thoughts, moods, and behaviors, mixed symptoms of schizophrenia…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-24 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolatedEnsure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide necessary care and services needed to perform ADLs ( Assisted Daily Living - fundamental self-care task required for a person to live independently, such as bathing, dressing, eating, and using the toilet) for one of eight sampled residents reviewed (Resident 36), when Resident 36 was not offered supervision and/or assistance on her upper and lower body dressing.This failure resulted in Resident 36 wearing the same clothing outfit from April 20, 2026, to April 26, 2026. In addition, this failure placed Resident 36 at risk of reduced abilities in activities of daily living (ADLs) due to the lack of appropriate assistance needed to prevent such decline.Findings:The following observations and interviews, were conducted with Resident 36, who was observed to be wearing a matching blue printed flannel top and bottom from April 20, 2026 to April 22, 2026:- On April 20, 2026, at 12:14 p.m., Resident 36 was observed ambulating in the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-24 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure care and treatment were provided, for two of five residents reviewed for skin management (Resident 95 and 66), when:1.For Resident 95, right anterior wrist skin redness with elevation was identified in a timely manner and was referred to the physician for treatment orders; and2.For Resident 66, the itching with redness on his neck, was identified in a timely manner and was referred to the physician for treatment orders.These failures caused discomfort for Residents 95 and 66 in the affected areas, and had the potential to increase their risk for complications due to delayed treatment. Findings: 1.On April 20, 2026, at 3:30 p.m., an observation with a concurrent interview was conducted with Resident 95. Resident 95 was observed to have a defined circular area of erythema (redness), elevated, dry with visible scaling, and mild textural changes to the top part of right wrist. In a concurrent interview, Resident 95 stated she had a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-24 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents are free from accidents, for two of three residents reviewed for accidents (Residents 177 and 140), when:1.For Resident 177, 1:1 monitoring ( staff who provides continuous, direct observation for a single patient to ensure safety) was implemented as ordered by the physician.This failure had the potential to place Resident 177 at high risk for harm and accidents; and2.For Resident 140, was not allowed to keep the cigarette and lighter by bedside according to the facility's policy and procedure.This failure had the potential to place Resident 140 at high risk of accidents.Findings:1.On April 20, 2026, at 9 a.m., an observation was conducted in Resident 177's room. Resident 177 was observed asleep in bed alone in his room. The call light was observed on top of the resident's dresser and was not within resident's reach. A call bell was observed on top of the resident's bedside table next to his bed. There was no staff…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-24 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure nutritional care and services were provided, for one of one sample resident reviewed for nutrition (Resident 12) when:1. The facility failed to monitor the effectiveness of nutrition interventions for Resident 12. This failure had the potential to result in delay in identifying and evaluating the necessity of an alternative nutrition approach; and2. The facility Registered Dietitians failed to follow its policy, WEIGHT CHANGE PROTOCOL to determine if meal intake of Resident 12 would be sufficient to meet Resident 12's nutritional needs. This failure had the potential to result in delay in identifying and evaluating the necessity of an alternative nutrition approach.These failures resulted in Resident 12 experiencing a 12 pound (8.5 percent) significant weight loss during a 4-months period from December 7, 2025, to April 9, 2026, and which could further impair nutrition and health status. Findings:During a review of Resident 12's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-24 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident's nasal cannula (a medical device used to deliver supplemental oxygen) was changed on a weekly basis according to the facility's policy and procedure, for one of six residents reviewed (Resident 62).This failure had the potential to result in increased risk of infection.Findings:On April 21, 2026, at 10:45 a.m., a concurrent observation and interview was conducted with Resident 62 in his room. Resident 62 was observed receiving oxygen via nasal cannula at 2 liters per minute (L/min - unit of measurement). The nasal cannula was labeled with a date of 4/12/26 (April 12, 2026), which indicated when it was last changed. In a concurrent interview with Resident 62, he stated he used oxygen continuously. A review of Resident 62's admission Record, indicated an admission date of September 29, 2024, with diagnoses which included shortness of breath.A review of Resident 62's History and Physical, dated November 29, 2025, indicated Resident 62 had fluctuating capacity to understand and make decisions.A…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-24 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure pain was assessed and managed, for one of three residents reviewed for pain management (Resident 20) when the licensed nurse did not assess, intervene, and obtain physician orders after the resident verbalized pain.This failure had the potential to result in unrelieved pain, discomfort, decreased quality of life, and decline in physical and psychosocial well-being.Findings:On April 21, 2026, at 8:21 a.m., during an interview with Resident 20, Resident 20 stated he requested pain medication (an acetaminophen) for arm and shoulder pain during the night shift in March 2026. Resident 20 stated the licensed nurse on the night shift informed him there was no physician order for (name of acetaminophen). Resident 20 stated he has previously been given (name of acetaminophen) without any issue.Resident 20's record was reviewed. Resident 20 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included end stage renal disease (irreversible kidney…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-24 · tag F0773 — isolatedProvide or obtain laboratory tests/services when ordered and promptly tell the ordering practitioner of the results.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure laboratory service was provided as ordered by the physician, for one of one residents reviewed (Resident 8), when the urinalysis (a small sample of your urine for signs of infection, kidney disease, or diabetes)/C&S (culture and sensitivity - a laboratory procedure that identifies infectious germs [culture] and determines the most effective antibiotic [sensitivity] to treat the infection) was not obtained as ordered by the physician.This failure had the potential for delayed care and treatment and could affect Resident 8's overall health condition.Findings:On April 21, 2026, at 11:10 a.m., Resident 8 was observed alert, resting in bed. Resident 8 was observed with a urinary/foley catheter (flexible, thin tube placed into the bladder to drain urine when you cannot pee normally). In a concurrent interview, Resident 8 stated his urinary catheter was placed due to safety reasons because he could not stand up to go to the restroom on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-24 · tag F0790 — failed to provide dental care — isolatedProvide routine and 24-hour emergency dental care for each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure dental care services and follow up treatment were provided, for one of three residents reviewed for dental (Resident 128), when there was no follow up dental consult for denture impressions after tooth extractions completed by the dentist on July 31, 2025.This failure had the potential to result in poor nutrition, and further decline in overall health. Findings:On April 21, 2026, at 11:04 a.m., Resident 128 was observed alert, resting in bed, with head of the bed elevated. Resident 128 was observed with only one tooth to the left, top front of her mouth and two teeth to the right, lower front of her mouth. Resident 128 was observed without any teeth or dentures to upper or lower posterior (back) gums. In a concurrent interview, Resident 128 stated she did not have dentures and that she wanted dentures.On April 22, 2026, Resident 128's medical record was reviewed. Resident 128 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-24 · tag F0810 — isolatedProvide special eating equipment and utensils for residents who need them and appropriate assistance.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure special adaptive equipment was provided to be used during meals as ordered by physician, for one of three sampled residents (Resident 62).This failure had the potential to slow down Resident 62's progress to eat independently.Findings: On April 20, 2026, at 12:18 p.m., a concurrent observation and Resident 62 meal ticket (contain Resident name, room number, physician diet order, Allergies, Adaptive Equipment, and food dislike) review were conducted with Resident 62 at Dunes dining room. Resident 62 was observed holding a spoon with right hand shaking tremendously feeding himself. Food particles were observed dropping all over on Resident 62's clothing protector and floor. Resident 62's meal ticket was concurrently reviewed and indicated, Buildup fork, Buildup knife, Buildup spoon. Resident 62 did not receive Buildup fork, Buildup knife, Buildup spoon to be used on his meal tray.On April 20, 2026, at 12:19 p.m., a concurrent interview and Resident 62 meal ticket review were conducted with Restorative…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-24 · tag F0813 — isolatedHave a policy regarding use and storage of foods brought to residents by family and other visitors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe and sanitary storage, and consumption of food items brought to the residents by family and visitors was implemented according to the facility's policy and procedure.This failure had the potential to lead to food-borne illness in medically compromised population of residents who can consume food. Findings: On April 21, 2026, at 9:22 a.m., an interview was conducted with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 8. LVN 8 stated food brought in by family and/or visitors for the residents could be stored in the nourishment refrigerator for three days. On April 21, 2026, at 10:23 a.m., an interview was conducted with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 4. CNA 4 stated food brought in by family and/or visitors for the residents could be stored in the nourishment refrigerator for seven days. On April 21, 2026, at 10:25 a.m., an interview was conducted with LVN 4. LVN 4 stated food brought in by family and/or visitors for the residents could be stored in the nourishment refrigerator 24 hours to three days. During a review of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-15 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's rights to privacy was provided, for two of four residents reviewed (Residents 2 and 3), when Resident 1, who was identified with wandering behavior, entered other residents' bedrooms without permission. The failure resulted in Resident 2 and 3's right to privacy being violated and had the potential to affect psychosocial well being.Findings:On March 25, 2026, at 8:55 a.m., an unannounced visit was made to the facility to investigate resident to resident altercation.On March 25, 2026, at 9:15 a.m., Resident 1 was observed lying in bed and fidgeting around a magazine on her hand.On March 25, 2026, at 9:22 a.m., Resident 3's room was observed to be the first room off the hall from Resident 1. There were no staff observed present in the hallway to monitor the residents' whereabouts.On March 25, 2026, Resident 1's record was reviewed. Resident 1's admission Record, indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-06 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure care and treatment was provided, for two of 20 residents reviewed (Residents A and F), when:1.For Resident A, the blood sugar levels were not evaluated to address control of diabetes mellitus (abnormal blood sugar). This failure had the potential for Resident A to experience complications of uncontrolled diabetes mellitus; and2.For Resident F, episodes of diarrhea (loose, watery and possibly more-frequent passage of stool) were not addressed timely. This failure resulted in a delay in the care and treatment to address illness related to diarrhea.Findings:On February 6, 2026, at 9:45 a.m., an unannounced visit was conducted to investigate quality of care issues.1. On February 6, 2026, Resident A's record was reviewed. Resident A's admission Record, indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included diabetes mellitus (abnormal blood sugar).A review of Resident A's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-06 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure infection prevention and control measures were implemented according to the facility's policy and procedure and CDC (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention) guidelines, for five of 20 residents reviewed, when: 1.The facility staff did not wear the appropriate PPE (Personal Protective Equipment - specialized clothing or gear such as gloves, gowns, masks, respirators, and eye protection designed to protect healthcare personnel and patients from infectious materials, blood, and body fluids) when providing care to residents with C-Diff infection (Clostridioides difficile - a bacterium that causes severe, often hospital-acquired, diarrhea and colon inflammation (colitis) by producing toxins) (Resident B). In addition, the facility staff were not aware of the isolation precautions to be implemented for Resident B, and the facility staff did not wash their hands after providing care to the residents with C-Diff (Residents B and C);…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-06 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the pharmacy consultant recommendation to check blood levels was not referred to the physician for implementation, for one of eight residents (Resident A).This failure had the potential for Resident A's overall medical condition to be affected.Findings:On February 6, 2026, at 9:45 a.m., an unannounced visit was conducted to investigate infection control issues.On February 6, 2026, Resident A's record was reviewed. Resident A's admission Record, indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included diabetes mellitus (abnormal blood sugar).A review of Resident A's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a resident assessment tool), dated January 17, 2026, indicated Resident A had BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 3 (severely cognitive impairment).A review of Resident A's Order Summary Report, included the following physician's order related to diabetes:- HgbA1C (Hemoglobin A1C - a blood test measuring average…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-24 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure infection control precautions were implemented in accordance with the policies and procedures for two of six sampled residents (Residents 4 and 3), when: 1.Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) 1 was observed at Resident 4's bedside wearing a face mask, and not wearing gown, gloves, and face shield. The resident requires a droplet precaution; and 2. CNA 2 was observed with Resident 3 at bedside wearing a face mask, and not wearing gown, gloves, and face shield. The resident requires a droplet precaution. These failures had the potential to increase the spread of influenza (a contagious viral infection of the respiratory tract) and cause serious illness in high-risk individuals.Findings: 1.On December 23, 2025, at 12:34 p.m., three signage and stocked PPE were observed outside Resident 4's room.A review of the three signage indicated the following: First signage, .Sequence for Putting On Personal Protective Equipment (PPE).1. Gown.2. Mask…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-10 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure an allegation of abuse was thoroughly investigated and results of the investigation were reported to the state survey agency (CDPH - California department of Public Health) within five (5) calendar days of the incident, in accordance with the facility's policy and procedure, for two of three residents reviewed (Resident A and B).This failure had the potential for further abuse or mistreatment to other residents in the facility.Findings:On November 24, 2025, at 10:15 a.m., an unannounced visit was conducted at the facility to investigate a resident-to-resident abuse. On November 24, 2025, at 10:40 a.m., an interview was conducted with the Social Service Director (SSD). The SSD stated Residents A and B had an altercation on November 9, 2025. The SSD stated Residents A and B were married but were roomed separately. The SSD stated Residents A and B got into an argument because another resident had feelings for Resident A, and Resident B became…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-10 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure care and treatment were provided, for one resident of six residents reviewed (Resident E), when the resident had a critical low hemoglobin (an iron containing protein in red blood cells-transports oxygen from the lungs to the body). In addition, there was no care plan developed to address Resident E's low hemoglobin levels. This failure resulted in Resident E not receiving appropriate monitoring, care and services to address critically low blood levels.Findings:On November 24, 2025, at 10:15 a.m., an unannounced visit to the facility was conducted, for an investigation of a complaint regarding quality of care. On November 24, 2025, at 2:20 p.m., an observation and attempted interview was conducted with Resident E. Resident E was in physical therapy performing upper and lower body exercises with small weights, no verbal response when spoke with resident.On November 24, 2025, a review of Resident E's medical record was conducted.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-10 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure an orthotic (an external brace or support used to align, support, prevent, or correct the function of the musculoskeletal system, like custom shoe inserts, ankle braces, or spinal supports, while orthotics refers to the science or practice of creating and applying these devices) consultation as recommended by the physical therapy (PT) was ordered timely, for one of five residents (Resident C).This failure had the potential to result in a delay in the rehabilitation progress of Resident C.Findings:On November 24, 2025, at 10:15 a.m., an unannounced visit to the facility was conducted to investigate a quality of care issue. On November 24, 2025, at 1:20 p.m., an interview was conducted with Resident C. Resident C stated he had been working with physical therapy and a leg brace was supposed to be ordered for him. On November 24, 2025, a review of Resident C's medical record was conducted. Resident C was admitted to the facility on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-27 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure call lights were answered as soon as possible, for one of five residents (Resident 2).This failure had the potential to cause delay of care, and to cause Resident 2's needs to not be met in a timely manner.Findings:On August 4, 2025, at 9:50 a.m., an unannounced visit was conducted at the facility for investigation of a facility reported incident involving Resident 2.A review of the facility's census indicated Resident 2 was no longer residing in the facility.A review of Resident 2's admission Record, indicated Resident 2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included fracture of the left humerus. Resident 2 was discharged from the facility on August 2, 2025.A review of Resident 2's (Name of facility) Room History, which contained information regarding how long Resident 2's call light remained on after it was turned on, indicated Resident 2's call light was turned on on July 20, 2025, at 11:24 a.m., and remained on for 58…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-27 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the plan of care was implemented to have another staff present while care was being provided, for one of three residents (Resident 3). This resulted in Resident 3's care plan to not be followed.Findings:On August 4, 2025, at 9:50 a.m., an unannounced visit was conducted at the facility for investigation of a facility reported incident regarding an allegation of abuse.On August 5, 2025, at 11:36 a.m., Resident 3 was observed lying on the first bed (bed A), awake and answering questions. Posted on the door of Resident 3's room was a sign indicating A Bed Cares in Pairs.Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 1 was observed to enter the room after putting on a disposable gown and a pair of gloves, and proceeded to change Resident 3's soiled disposable underwear, as well as clean the resident. CNA 1 stated Resident 3 was supposed to be Cares in Pairs, which meant It should be two persons all the time, but could not find anybody to assist…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-06-25 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — patternImplement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure an effective antibiotic surveillance program (program to help monitor the effectiveness of antibiotics, identify emerging resistance patterns, and inform strategies for infection prevention and control) was conducted, for 11 out of 12 residents (Residents 2, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, and 17), according to the facility's policy and procedure. This failure resulted to the residents' use of antibiotic not to be evaluated for the appropriateness of its use, which could lead to development of complications related to use of the antibiotics. Findings: On May 13, 2025, at 9:35 a.m., an unannounced visit was conducted at the facility to investigate complaints on infection control. On May 13, 2025, at 3:10 p.m., during an interview with the Infection Preventionist (IP), the IP stated a list of residents on antibiotics were being printed daily and he follows up with the licensed nurses to make sure the residents are still receiving the antibiotics as ordered. The IP stated he would also check if there were any adverse…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-25 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure TB (tuberculosis - a serious lung infection) test was completed according to the facility's policy and procedure, for two of three residents (Residents 2 and 3). This failure had the potential for TB to be undetected and could result to the transmission of the disease to the vulnerable residents. Findings: On May 13, 2025, at 9:35 a.m., an unannounced visit was conducted to investigate a complaint on infection control. On May 13, 2025, at 11:57 a.m., during an interview with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 1, LVN 1 stated a TB test was to be completed within 24 hours of admission and to be documented in the electronic Medication Administration Record (eMAR). On May 13, 2025, at 12:45 p.m., during an interview with LVN 2, LVN 2 stated a TB test was to be completed within 24 hours of admission. Resident 2's record was concurrently reviewed with LVN 2. LVN 2 stated Resident 2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. LVN 2 stated there was no…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-24 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement the facility's policy and procedure on abuse on investigating an allegation of abuse, for one of seven residents reviewed (Resident 2) when Resident 2 reported an allegation of abuse by Physical Therapy Assistant (PTA). In addition, the facility did not suspend the PTA after Resident 2 reported an allegation of abuse. This failure had the potential to result in further abuse to Resident 2 and other vulnerable residents. Findings: On April 4, 2025, at 9:15 a.m., an unannounced visit was conducted at the facility to investigate a complaint regarding resident abuse. On April 4, 2025, at 12:45 p.m., Resident 2 was observed sitting up in bed. In a concurrent interview, Resident 2 stated the PTA was assisting her out of her bed into a wheelchair when she roughly squeezed her and caused a skin tear to her right arm last March 2025. Resident 2 further stated the Director of Rehabilitation (DOR) was aware of the allegation because…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-24 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to report an allegation of abuse to California Department of Public Health (CDPH), immediately or within two hours after an allegation of abuse was reported, for one of seven residents (Resident 2), when Resident 2 reported an allegation of abuse by the Physical Therapy Assistant (PTA). This failure had the potential to result in delayed investigation of abuse and further exposed Resident 2 and other vulnerable residents to abuse by the PTA. Findings: On April 4, 2025, at 9:15 a.m., an unannounced visit was conducted at the facility to investigate a complaint regarding resident abuse. On April 4, 2025, at 12:45 p.m., Resident 2 was observed sitting up in bed. In a concurrent interview, Resident 2 stated the PTA was assisting her out of her bed into a wheelchair when she roughly squeezed her and caused a skin tear to her right arm last March 2025. Resident 2 further stated the Director of Rehabilitation (DOR) was aware of the allegation…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-24 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure care and treatment was provided, for one of seven residents (Resident 2), when Resident 2 sustained a skin tear on the right wrist. This failure had the potential for a delay in the care and treatment of Resident 2 skin tear on the right wrist. Findings: On April 4, 2025, at 12:45 p.m., Resident 2 was observed to be sitting in bed with a beige wound dressing on the right wrist. In a concurrent interview with Resident 2, she stated she sustained a skin tear on the right wrist due to the blood pressure cuff being used to get her blood pressure. On April 4, 2025, Resident 2's record was reviewed. Resident 2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included abnormalities of gait and mobility and long term use of anticoagulants (medication to prevent blood clots). A review of Resident 2's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a resident assessment tool), dated March 3, 2025, indicated Resident 2 had a Brief Interview for Mental…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-24 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolatedMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a sanitary environment, for one out of seven residents (Resident 7), when black mold was observed in Resident 7's shower. This failure had the potential to result in physical and psychosocial effect to Resident 7. Findings: On April 7, 2025, at 1:55 p.m., a concurrent interview and observation was conducted with Resident 7. Resident 7 stated there was a black mold in her shower. Resident 7's shower room was observed to have black grimy substance. On April 7, 2025, at 3:52 p.m., an interview and concurrent observation was conducted with the Housekeeper (HK) in Resident 7's bathroom. Black grimy substance was observed in the shower area at the corner of the bathroom. In a concurrent interview with HK, she stated the black substance looks like mold. The HK stated that it should not be there. On April 7, 2025, at 3:56 p.m., an interview and concurrent observation was conducted with the Housekeeping Supervisor (HS) in Resident 7's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-09 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the facility's policy and procedure on accounting for narcotic controlled substances was followed when: 1. The liquid Ativan (anti-anxiety medication) for one of one resident (Resident 1) was not appropriately verified against the Narcotics and Controlled Substances Count Sheet (a sheet used to monitor the administration of a medication); and 2. The off-going (end of shift) and on-coming (beginning of shift) nurses did not sign the Narcotic and Controlled Substance (Shift-to-Shift) Count Sheet, after completion of the end of shift resident narcotic medications count. These failures could have led to an inaccurate medication count, and a discrepancy in medication count records, and has the potential for drug diversion. Findings: On March 14, 2025, at 10:35 a.m., an unannounced visit was made to the facility to investigate a complaint regarding pharmacy services. 1. A review of Resident 2 ' s admission Record, indicated, Resident 2…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-09 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure preferences were honored, for one of four residents (Resident 1), when the facility staff used bleach to clean her room despite Resident 1's request not to use bleach when disinfecting her room while she was inside the room. This failure resulted to Resident 1's preference not honored and could affect the resident's overall psychosocial well being. Findings: On March 14, 2025, at 10:40 a.m., an unannounced visit was made to the facility to investigate a complaint on physical environment. On March 14, 2025, at 12:39 p.m., during an interview conducted with Housekeeper (HK) 1, she stated she would clean the residents' rooms daily with several cleaning products, including bleach. HK 1 stated approximately 1 month prior, Resident 1 requested her not to clean her bedroom with any chemicals that smell like bleach, because the resident did not like the smell, and it made her cough. HK 1 stated she informed her supervisor of Resident 1 ' s…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-04 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify the police and Adult Protective Services (APS - social services program that helps adults who are abused, neglected, or financially exploited), of an allegation of financial abuse, by an acquaintance, towards a resident, for one of three residents (Resident 1), according to the facility's policy and procedure. This failure had the potential for Resident 1 to be a victim of financial abuse without investigation from the police or APS. Findings: On February 11, 2025, at 8:20 a.m., an unannounced visit was conducted at the facility to investigate an allegation of abuse. A review of Resident 1's, admission Record, indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included encephalopathy (brain disease or damage resulting in brain function changes, including impaired memory). A review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a resident assessment tool), dated February 11, 2025, indicated Resident 1 had a Brief Interview…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-04 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure human immunodeficiency virus (HIV - a virus that attacks the body's immune system) medications was administered, for one of three residents (Resident 2), according to the physician's orders. The failure had the potential to put Resident 2 at risk for an increased HIV viral load (amount of virus present in the blood), a weakened immune system & increased risk of opportunistic infections. Findings: On February 11, 2025, at 10:55 a.m., an unannounced visit was made to the facility to investigate quality of care issue. A review of Resident 2's, admission Record, indicated Resident 2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included HIV. A review of Resident 2's, Order Summary Report, included the following physician's orders: - Dolutegravir Sodium (HIV medication), 50 MG (milligrams - a unit of measurement), one time a day, dated January 7, 2025; and - Rilpivirine Hydrochloric acid (HIV medication), 25 MG, one time a day, dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-04 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide Restorative Nursing Services (RNA - services provided to help increase/and or prevent a decrease in range of motion {ROM -Full flexion and extension of a joint}), as ordered by the physician, for one of five residents (Resident 2). This failure has the potential for the resident to develop muscle contractures (permanent shortening of the muscle due to lack of use), and decreased ROM and/or mobility for Resident 2. Findings: On February 11, 2025, an unannounced visit was made to the facility to investigate a complaint on quality of care issue. On February 12, 2025, at 11:24 a.m., a concurrent record review of RNA treatments provided the week of February 2 thru 9, 2025, and interview with RNA 1 was conducted. RNA 1 stated RNA treatments were being provided to the residents to help increase their ROM and mobility. RNA 1 stated treatments were ordered by the physician and should be provided accordingly. RNA 1 stated it was important to consistently…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-31 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure effectiveness of interventions to address multiple falls were evaluated and provide new interventions to prevent further falls, for one of three residents (Resident 1). This failure had the potential for Resident 1 to experience further falls and sustain serious injury from repeated unwitnessed falls. Findings: On January 28, 2025, at 10 a.m., an unannounced visit to the facility was made for a quality of care issue. On January 28, 2025, at 2:12 p.m., a concurrent observation and interview of Resident 1 was conducted. Resident 1 was observed resting in a low bed with blue padded mats at both sides of the bed. Bed alarm (alerts staff when resident ' s getting out of bed-{OOB}) was observed attached to the bed and a motion pad (alarms when body pressure is lifted from pad) located underneath Resident 1. Resident 1 stated she had three recent falls but could not remember the dates. Resident 1 stated she fell because, I try to do…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-21 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure an allegation of abuse by the Restorative Nursing Assistant (RNA) towards a resident, for one of six residents (Resident 3), was reported to the California Department of Health (CDPH - State Agency) immediately or within two hours after the facility was made aware of the alleged abuse. This failure resulted in a delayed investigation by CDPH and had the potential to expose the patient to further abuse. Findings: On December 23, 2024, at 9:24 a.m., an unannounced visit was conducted at the facility to investigate facility reported incident and complaint intake. On December 23, 2024, at 1:10 p.m., Resident 3 was observed lying in bed. In a concurrent interview with Resident 3, he stated he was standing on his walker and Restorative Nursing Assistant (RNA) 1 grabbed his buttocks and squeezed it more than twice. Resident 3 stated he told his family member (FM) about the incident. On December 23, 2024, Resident 3 ' s medical record was reviewed.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-01-10 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — widespreadDispose of garbage and refuse properly.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure garbage bins were not overflowing and properly closed, for two of five garbage bins. In addition, trash was found on the ground beneath the dumpsters. This failure had the potential to attract pests and rodents. Findings: On January 6, 2025, at 4:50 p.m., the loading dock was observed with the Food Service Director (FSD). Two of five dumpsters were observed overflowing with boxes, the lids were not fully closed, and trash was found on the ground beneath the dumpsters. In a concurrent interview with the FSD, he stated the lids should be properly closed and trash should not be on the ground, as this could attract pests and rodents. On January 9, 2025, at 10:02 a.m., during an interview with Registered Dietitian (RD) 1, RD 1 stated the dumpster lids should be properly closed, as it attracts pests and flies, which could go the kitchen when the door is open. RD 1 further stated it would be also an infection control issue. A review of the facility's policy and procedure titled MISCELANEOUS AREAS, dated 2023,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-10 · tag F0554 — patternAllow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure an assessment for safe self-administration of medication was conducted, for three of 165 residents (Residents 101, 265, and 19) when: 1. One opened Ventolin HFA (albuterol sulfate inhalation aerosol- medication used to prevent and treat wheezing and shortness of breath) 90 mcg (micrograms- unit of measurement) per actuation (ACT- allows the patient to operate the inhaler and directs the medicine into the patient's lungs) inhaler was found inside Resident 101's desk drawer; 2. Three opened medications were found on top of Resident 265's bedside drawer, as follows: - One Trelegy Ellipta (brand name) 30 dose inhaler (combination of fluticasone furoate, umeclidine, and vilanterol inhalation powder- medications used to treat chronic obstructive lung disease and asthma) 100 mcg/6.25mcg/25 mcg, with an expiration date of May 2026; - One Combivent Respimat (brand name for combination of ipratropium bromide and albuterol inhalation spray-…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-10 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — patternReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure call lights were answered within a reasonable time, for three of 34 residents, (Resident 95, 5, and 464). Thes failures resulted in a delay of care and had the potential for the residents' needs to not be met. (Cross Reference F725) Findings: 1. On January 6, 2025, at 3:33 p.m., an observation and concurrent interview was conducted with Resident 95 in his room. Resident 95 was observed lying in bed, alert, and agreed to the interview. Resident 95 stated he was frustrated that when he used the call light, no one would come, and if they did, they just turned the light off without addressing his needs. Resident 95 stated it would take hours before a staff would answer his call light, and this had been happening for more than two months. On January 8, 2025, Resident 95's record was reviewed. Resident 95 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included cerebral infarction (when blood flow to the brain in block), and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-10 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — patternHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to uphold resident's rights when: 1. Formulation of an Advance Directive (AD - a written instruction, such as a living will, relating to the provision of treatment and services when the individual becomes unable to decide) was not offered to the resident and/or their resident representative , for seven of 13 residents reviewed for Advance Directives (Residents 514, 463, 116, 123, 263, 95, 38, and 81); and 2. Copies of the AD were not available in the medical records, for one of 13 residents reviewed for AD (Residents 13). These failures had the potential to result in the residents' wishes related to the provision of medical treatment and services, to not be followed if the residents became unable to make decisions for themselves. Findings: 1a. On January 7, 2025, Resident 514's record was reviewed. Resident 514 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included encounter for palliative care (medical approach maximizing quality of life).…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-10 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a comfortable homelike environment, for five of 165 resdients (Residents 63, 265, 28, 73, and 27), when peeled and damaged wall paper were observed inside the resident rooms 808, 212, 213, 113, and 609. These failures had the potential to affect the comfort and psychosocial well being of the residents. Findings: 1. On January 6, 2025, at 3:02 p.m., during a concurrent observation and interview with Resident 63 in room [ROOM NUMBER]. Resident 63 was observed looking at peeled and damaged wallpaper above her head board. Resident 63 stated she was not comfortable seeing the peeled wall paper. Resident 63 further stated I did not peel the wall paper. On January 7, 2024, at 3:11 p.m., during an interview with the Maintenance Supervisor (MS), the MS stated when the bed was pulled up, Resident 63's head board scraped against the wall and caused it to rip off. The MS further stated, It should have been fixed and repaired. 2. On January 7,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-01-10 · tag F0640 — patternEncode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS - a resident assessment tool) assessments were submitted to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS - provides health coverage) in a timely manner, for five of 10 residents reviewed fro Resident Assessment (Residents 20, 31, 33, 72, and 81),: These failures resulted in the facility being out of compliance with federal regulations. Findings: A review of the Resident Assessment Instrument Manual (RAI guidelines for resident assessment), dated October 2024, indicated, .Transmission Date No Later Than .Quarterly Assessments .MDS completion date (14 days from ARD (Assessment Reference Date - the final day of the observation period for the MDS assessment) + (plus) 14 calendar days (total of 28 days from ARD) . On January 9, 2025, the following MDS assessments were reviewed: a. Resident 20's Quarterly MDS indicated the ARD was dated November 29, 2024, and was transmitted to CMS on January 9, 2025 (41 days after ARD); b. Resident 31's Quarterly MDS indicated the ARD was dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-01-10 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — patternProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident's preferred activity was consistently provided, for three of three residents for activities (Resident 10, 48, and 128). This failure had the potential to result in residents to have an inactive life while in the facility. Findings: 1. On January 6, 2025, at 2:31 p.m., during concurrent observation and interview with Resident 10 in her room, Resident 10 was observed sitting at the edge of the bed and was combing her hair while watching TV. Resident 10 stated there was nothing to do but to watch TV and she would just sleep and take naps in the afternoon. Resident 10 further stated she wanted to do hair services and hair styling, I was a beautician before. A review of Resident 10's admission Record, indicated Resident 10 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included dementia (memory loss). A review of Resident 10's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a resident assessment tool), dated December 17, 2024,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-10 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — patternProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure sufficient staff were provided to meet the needs of the residents, when: 1. For 15 of 165 residents (Residents 45, 101, 85, 88, 124, 91, 138, 20, 2, 139, 318, 265, 23, 104, and 123) complained of staff failing to aid with activities of daily living (ADLs- daily care activities) in a timely manner; and 2. Seven of eight confidentially interviewed residents from the Resident Council meeting complained of call lights not being answered timely, lost personal belongings, and meals not being delivered on time. These deficient practices caused feelings of frustration amoung the residents, and negatively affected the quality of care for the residents. Findings: 1a. On [DATE], at 10:39 a.m., during an interview with Resident 45, Resident 45 stated there were not enough Certified Nursing Assistants (CNA) on the night shifts and the CNAs were worked to death. Resident 45 stated the response time was very slow during the night time, with a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-10 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure provision of pharmacy services met the needs of the residents when: 1. An unopened container of Controlled II (CII, Schedule II drugs with a high potential for abuse) Emergency Kit (E-kit, a sealed container of various medications for use in emergencies) contained a small, opened E-kit medication box with no medications inside and no documentation of missing medications on the outside of the E-kit container. This failure had the potential to significantly delay treatment for pain; and 2. Three different medications lowering blood pressure were administered to Resident 103 when Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP, the top number in blood pressure reading which measures how hard the heart pumps blood into arteries) levels were below the holding parameter orders. This failure had the potential to inadequately control Resident 103's blood pressure. Findings: 1. On January 8, 2025, at 8:30 a.m., during an inspection of the CII E-kit with the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-10 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to store and label medications in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions and the facility policy and procedures when: 1. Total of three expired medications were identified in the medication refrigerator, IV/IM (intravenous/intramuscular, routes of administrations, methods of injecting medication into body) E-kit (Emergency Kit, a sealed container of various medications for use in emergencies) and the oral E-kit; 2. Total of six different medications without the open dates were stored in the medication room, the medication refrigerator, and the medication carts; 3. A discontinued order of controlled medication was stored in the medication cart; and 4. A box of ointment was stored in the treatment cart with no pharmacy-applied labels. These deficient practices had the potential for residents to receive unsafe and less potent medications, and the potential for medication errors from improperly labeled medications and the discontinued…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-01-10 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — patternProvide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Food service staff were able to carry out the functions of food and nutrition services safely and effectively when: 1. [NAME] 1 and Food Service Director (FSD) did not follow the recipes to prepare pureed foods items (bread, chicken, and vegetable) during dinner meal on January 6, 2025; (Cross reference 803) 2. [NAME] 1 and Diet Aide 3 used water as sanitizer to clean used kitchen equipment; 3. [NAME] 1, [NAME] 2, and Diet Aide 3 did not follow manufacturer guideline instruction time length for submerging washed kitchenware in sanitizer sink; and 4. [NAME] 1, [NAME] 2, and Diet Aide 4 did not follow facility's sanitization policy and procedure to clean the used prep counter and equipment. These failures had the potential to cause foodborne illness for 161 out of 165 sampled residents who received foods from the kitchen and aspiration (accidentally inhaling food or liquid into the lungs) and providing insufficient nutrients for twelve out of twelve sample residents who had physician order for pureed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-10 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — patternEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure: 1. Recipes were followed to prepare pureed food items (bread, chicken, and vegetables) during dinner meal on January 6, 2025. This failure had the potential for 15 out of 15 residents receiving pureed food prepared in the kitchen to not meet their nutritional needs which may lead to nutritional related health complications; and 2. Recipes for seasoning broccoli was followed during lunch meal on January 7, 2025 (Cross reference F804). This failure had the potential for 161 out of 165 residents receiving food prepared in the kitchen to not meet their nutritional needs which may lead to nutritional related health complications. Findings: 1. On January 6, 2025, at 3:25 p.m., during an observation in the kitchen, there were pureed chicken and vegetables (carrots and green beans) in separate deep pans inside the steamer. Both half of the deep pans were filled with liquid. On January 6, 2025, at 3:47 p.m., during a concurrent observation and interview with [NAME] (CK) 1, CK 1 was observed preparing pureed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-10 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow its policy and procedure to provide appetizing and palatable (refers to the taste and/or flavor of the food) food at appropriate temperatures according to residents' preferences, for nine out of 161 sample residents, Residents 2, 3, 20, 34, 45, 87, 103, 145, and 264. This failure placed residents at potential risk to decrease nutritional intake and affect the resident's nutrition status. Findings: (Cross reference 804) On January 6, 2025, at 10:39 a.m., during an interview, Resident 45 stated the egg salad did not have any real egg cut up in it and is like baby food, the cheese enchiladas are hard and brittle. Resident 45 stated he had spoken to the manager, but nothing changed. On January 6, 2025, at 11:58 a.m., during an interview, Resident 264 stated her food was lukewarm and a little on the cold side. On January 6, 2025, at 12:05 p.m., during an interview, Resident 34 stated the food is often served cold for all meals. On January 6, 2025, at 12:10 p.m., during an interview, Resident 103 stated the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-01-10 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — patternEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure pureed bread was prepared following the recipe, for 12 of 12 residents (Residents 18, 38, 44, 58, 96, 126, 109, 463, 513, 663, 664 and 665) who had physician prescribed order for pureed diet texture. This failure had the potential to place the residents at risk of aspiration (accidentally inhaling food or liquid into the lungs), choking and decreased meal intake. Findings: On January 6, 2025, at 3:47 p.m., during a concurrent observation and interview with [NAME] (CK) 1, CK 1 was preparing pureed bread. CK 1 stated he used a half loaf of wheat bread, 240 milliliters (a unit of measurement) of 2% milk and two tablespoons of butter to cook the bread in the steamer. CK 1 used a whisk to puree the cooked bread. The finished pureed bread appeared lumpy. CK 1 was observed not to follow any recipe when preparing pureed bread. On January 6, 2025, at 4:33 p.m., a concurrent interview and taste test (to evaluate the quality of a meal during a normal meal service and identify any areas of improvement) for pureed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-01-10 · tag F0809 — failed to serve meals on a reasonable schedule — patternEnsure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure evening snacks were offered to eight of nine residents (Residents 3, 124, 464, 50, 67, 76, 11, and 13). This failure had the potential to affect the nutritional and wellbeing of the residents. Findings: On January 7, 2025, at 10:30 a.m., during the resident council meeting, Residents 3, 124, and 464 stated they were not offered evening snacks. Resident 124 stated when she asked for evening snack it took a long time for nursing to get the snack for her. On January 7, 2025, at 8:03 p.m., an observation was conducted at Nurse station Dunes area. Diet Aide (DA) 1 delivered a black container consist of evening snacks to Nurse station. Each food item inside the black container was labeled with resident's name and room number, there was no extra snacks available. On January 7, 2025, at 8:09 p.m., an interview was conducted with Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) 6. CNA 6 stated he only passed evening snacks with resident's name on the food items. He never offered evening snacks for residents. CNA 6 stated if a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-10 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe and sanitary food preparation and storage practices in the kitchen when: 1. Thawed, uncooked meat (chicken and bacon) was stored in the walk-in refrigerator past their use-by dates; 2. A coffee cart was stored next to an uncovered trash bin; 3. Trash was found on the kitchen floor in multiple areas; 4. Worn-out cutting boards were still in use by dietary staff; 5. Buildup was found on different kitchen equipment; 6. Moldy, bruised, wilted, and wrinkled produce (tomatoes, cucumber, zucchini, red bell peppers and strawberries) were found in the walk-in refrigerator; 7. A rolling cart used to store soup bowls and dessert cups had chipping white coating; 8. Food residue was on the condiment tray underneath the prep area; 9. Dust accumulation in several areas of the kitchen was found; 10. An opened cheese enchilada stored in the walk-in freezer exposed to the air; and 11. An expired cranberry cocktail was stored inside the nourishment room refrigerator. These failures had the potential to cause…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-10 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — patternMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a sanitary and comfortable environment, for two of seven residents reviewed for environment (Residents 22 and 63), when: 1. For Resident 22, appropriate window covering to block the light per resident's preference was not provided; and 2. For Resident 63, multiple black stained patches of bathroom floors were observed inside the resident's room. In addition, rooms [ROOM NUMBERS] were also observed to have black stained patches on the bathroom floors. These failures resulted in the resident feeling uncomfortable and disrupted the resident's daily living needs and environment. Findings: 1. On January 6, 2025, at 3:52 p.m., during a concurrent observation and interview with Resident 22 in her room, a multi-colored bath towel was observed hanging over a brown vertical window blind. Resident 22 stated she had asked the nurses to replace the window blinds with darker shades to block the light that came through the window. Resident 22…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-10 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to treat resident with respect and dignity when the facility staff failed to cover the urinary bag, for one of four residents reviewed for dignity (Resident 516). This failure increased the potential to negatively affect Resident 516's psychosocial wellbeing. Findings: On January 6, 2025, at 10:16 a.m., Resident 516 was observed with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 1. Resident 516's urinary bag was observed attached to the resident and was filled with 110 ml (milliliter-unit of measurement) yellow liquid content. The urinary bag was observed uncovered and hanging below the level of Resident 516's bed. In a concurrent interview with LVN 1, LVN 1 stated the staff did not cover the urinary bag with a privacy bag (used to cover urine collection bag) and was exposed to everyone. LVN 1 further stated, It should have been covered, I would feel embarrassed if that bag was mine and not covered. On January 9, 2025, at 4:30 p.m., during an interview…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-10 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure necessary care and services to achieve and maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being were provided, for two of two residents reviewed (Residents 515 and 414), when: 1. For Resident 515, treatment orders were not initiated upon identification of a blister on the right heel. This failure had the potential to result in worsening of the wound, which could negatively affect the health status of Resident 515; and 2. For Resident 414, the following medications were not administered as ordered by the physician: - Eliquis (medication to reduce formation of blood clots) 5 (five) mg (milligram- a unit of measuerement); - Atorvastatin (medication used to lower cholesterol) 40 mg ; and - Gabapentin (medication to reduce nerve pain) oral solution 250mg/5ml (milliliter- a unit of measurement). This failure had the potential for Resident 414 to experience pain, discomfort and increased possibility of blood…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-10 · tag F0685 — isolatedAssist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a scheduled eye appointment was followed up, for one of one resident (Resident 50) reviewed for vision. This failure had the potential for Resident 50 to not receive the necessary treatment timely to maintain effective vision. Findings: On January 6, 2025, at 10 a.m., during a concurrent observation and interview with Resident 50 in her room, Resident 50 was observed laying on bed wearing a pair of eyeglasses with three clear adhesive tapes attached to the frame of the left lens. Resident 50 stated she needed eyeglasses to be able to read and see clearly. Resident 50 stated she requested to have an eye checkup to replace the glasses that she was using but the facility did not provide a schedule for eye appointment. Resident 50 further stated, It's a serious issue, I can't see without glasses. On January 10, 2025, Resident 50's record was reviewed. Resident 50 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-10 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide sufficient nutrition, monitor the effectiveness of nutritional intervention, and recommend interventions to maintain an acceptable parameters of nutritional status, for one of five sampled residents (Resident 116, when: 1. Resident 116 did not receive the requested juices on his meal tray according to the diet order and resident's food preferences; 2. Resident 116 did not receive a protein substitute in the meal tray to honor the resident's preference for a vegetarian diet. In addition, the facility did not have a menu spreadsheet for a vegetarian diet; 3. There was no alternative measures implemented for resident's refusal to be weighed; 4. There was no monitoring of Resident 116's consumption of the protein shake ordered; 5. The Registered Dietitian (RD)'s recommendation to give Resident 116 protein shake supplement five times a day was not implemented or offered to the resident since July 15, 2024; and 6. There was no…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-10 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interiew, and record review, the facility failed to provide pain management according to the physician's order, for one of two residents reviewed for pain (Resident 267), when the resident was not given the pain medication Norco (a narcotic pain medication) according to the physician's order. This failure resulted in Resident 267 experiencing inadequate pain relief. Findings: On January 10, 2025, at 6:30 a.m., Resident 267 was observed lying in bed, responding to name when called. In a concurrent interview, Resident 267 stated she got Norco (hydrocodone-acetaminophen- a narcotic pain medication) routinely every six (6) hours due to multiple fractures (broken bones). Resident 267 stated she had last received pain medication 14 hours ago. Resident 267 stated her pain level was 11/10 (pain scale: 1-3= mild pain, 4-7= moderate pain, 8-10= severe pain), and would not be answering any more questions until her pain was resolved. Resident 267 stated she had been asking for her pain medication since…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-10 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the consultant pharmacist (CP)'s Medication Regimen Review (MRR) recommendation for one of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications (Resident 50) was carried out in a timely manner. In addition, the facility's MRR policies did not include the time frames for the physician to act upon the CP's MRR recommendation. These failures resulted in inadequate monitoring and had the potential to result in ineffective medication management and to compromise the Resident 50's health. Findings: On January 9, 2025, the Resident 50's medical record was reviewed. Resident 50's admission Record, indicated was readmitted to the facility on [DATE], with the diagnoses that included hypertensive heart disease with heart failure (elevated blood pressure). A review of Resident 50's physician's order indicated furosemide (medication to reduce fluid retention and to treat high blood pressure) 20 mg (milligram - unit of measurement), 1 tablet by mouth one time…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-10 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure antipsychotic medications (medications to treat psychotic disorders with symptoms of altered sense of reality) were ordered and used for residents with proper diagnoses and evaluations to meet residents' needs, for one of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications (Resident 157). An antipsychotic medication for sleep received while Resident 157 was admitted in the hospital was ordered to continue with a new indication of psychosis (symptoms of psychotic disorders) without prior history of psychotic disorders and thorough psychiatric evaluation by a qualified medical professional. This failure had the potential for residents to receive an unnecessary medication with serious long term adverse effects including permanent movement disorder, seizure, and uneven heart rate. Findings: On January 8, 2025, Resident 157's medical record was reviewed. Resident 157's admission Record, indicated Resident 157 was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-10 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility had a medication error rate of 7.14% when two medication errors occurred out of 28 opportunities during the medication administration, for two out of six residents (Resident 465 and 314). The deficient practice resulted in medications not given in accordance with the prescriber's orders and had the potential for residents not receiving the full therapeutic effects of medications with the potential for worsening of residents' medical conditions. Findings: 1. On January 7, 2025, at 9:10 a.m., during a medication administration observation with the Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN ) 12, LVN 12 was observed preparing and administering four medications for Resident 465. One of the observed medications was Lidocaine 4% patch (topical patch medication for pain relief). A review of the Resident 465's physician's order, dated 2022, indicated, Lidoderm Patch (Lidocaine), Apply to Lt (left) shoulder/neck topically every 24 hours for neck pain and remove per schedule. The physician's order did not indicate strength of the lidocaine…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-10 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolatedProvide or obtain dental services for each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to identify, refer, and follow up the dental needs for the resident, for one of one resident reviewed for dental (Resident 22). These failures have the potential to place the resident at high risk for complications related to dental and psychosocial needs due to the possible delay in providing dental devices. Findings: On January 6, 2025, at 3:52 p.m., during a concurrent observation and interview with Resident 22 in her room, resident was observed with missing upper and lower teeth and unable to speak words clearly. Resident 22 stated she requested the staff and social worker she wanted to see the dentist so she can have recommendation to have dentures, but she had not been seen by a dentist since admission. Resident 22 further stated, I am embarrassed to smile and it's hard to chew a food. On January 9, 2025, Resident 22's record was reviewed. Resident 22 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included depression and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-10 · tag F0801 — isolatedEmploy sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Food Service Director (FSD - the position responsible for the day-to-day operation of the dietary department), met the educational requirements as outlined in the facility's policy, Federal Regulation, and California Health and Safety Code. Findings: According to California Code of Regulations, Title 22: Dietetic services are defined as the provision of safe, satisfying, and nutritionally adequate food for residents with appropriate staff, space, equipment, and supplies. Staffing requirements of dietetic services are such that if the position responsible for the day-to-day management of the department is not a registered dietitian there must be a full-time person who meets specific training requirements to be the dietetic services supervisor, responsible for the operation of the food service. According to the California, Health, and Safety Code - HSC § 1265.4: Qualifications of Dietary Supervisor: (b) The dietetic services supervisor shall have completed at least one of the following educational requirements:…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-10 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident's beverage preference was honored on January 6, 2025 lunch and protein substitution was given on January 9, 2025 breakfast for one of one sampled resident (Resident 116). This failure resulted in Resident 116 not to receive sufficient calories and protein which could contribute to the unplanned weight loss, further compromising Resident 116's nutritional and medical status. Finding: (Cross reference 692) On January 6, 2025, at 11:37 a.m., Resident 116 was interviewed. Resident 116 stated he was a vegetarian and the vegetable that he was eating was always canned food and was not fresh. On January 6, 2025, at 12:12 p.m., a concurrent observation, interview and meal ticket review was conducted with Resident 116 at the bedside. Resident 116 was lying in bed with the noon meal tray in front of him. Resident 116's meal ticket indicated a, Regular diet, yogurt, extra Veg [vegetables], 4 fluid ounce (oz) apple juice, 4 fluid oz cranberry juice, Dislikes: Meat, Fish, eggs. Resident 116 was served…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-10 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, facility failed to ensure infection control practices were implemented when Certified Nursing Assistants (CNA) did not wear personal protective equipment (PPE - equipment used to protect against infection or illness) when providing care to a resident with enhanced barrier precautions (EBP- infection control intervention to reduce transmission of multi-drug resistant organism [MDRO- bacteria that have become resistant to multiple antibiotics]). This failure had the potential spread infections throughout the facility, which is transferred through direct close contact of skin to skin or sharing of bedding or clothing. Findings: On January 7, 2025, at 9:37 a.m., Resident 463's door was observed to have a sign posted indicating Enhanced Barrier Precaution (EBP). Resident 463 was observed lying in bed with eyes open and the call light was on. Observed CNAs 8 and 9 to enter Resident 463's room, cleaned and changed Resident 463 without wearing a PPE. On January 7, 2025, at 9:48 a.m., during an interview with CNA 8, she stated there was no…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-10 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — isolatedKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure bed equipment in the residents' rooms were maintained in a safe operating condition, when the bed controls were observed to have damaged and exposed wirings, for two of seven residents reviewed (Residents 8 and 318). This failure to maintain a functional environment had the potential to compromise resident safety. 1. On January 6, 2025, at 9:38 a.m., a concurrent observation and interview was conducted with Resident 8 inside her room. The bed control to the left of Resident 8's bed was observed damaged, and the inner wire was exposed. Resident 8 stated she reported it a long time ago, but was never repaired. Resident 8 further stated every time she used the bed control, It makes me nervous. On January 7, 2025, at 3:08 p.m., an interview was conducted with the Maintenance Supervisor (MS). The MS stated the bed control cord was torn and the inner wires were exposed. The MS stated the bed control cord should have been fixed and replaced to prevent further damage, that led to malfunction of the device. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-25 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure infection control practices were implemented when: 1. Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 1 did not use Personal Protective Equipment (PPE - equipment use to protect against infection or illness) when providing care to a resident requiring contact isolation precaution (an infection control intervention to prevent the spread of harmful germs that can be transmitted through touch); 2. Three direct care staff did not perform proper handwashing before and after proving care to a resident; and 3. The Physical Therapy Assistant (PTA - a healthcare professional who works under the supervision of a licensed physical therapist to deliver physical therapy treatments to patients) did not clean and disinfect (use of chemicals to reduce the number of bacteria or virus particles on surfaces) the gait belt (device used to aid in the safe movement of a patient) before and after resident use. These failures had the potential to increase the spread of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-14 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to transfer a resident via ambulance, on an emergent basis (unstable health condition), to the General Acute Care Hospital (GACH) for further evaluation, for one of three residents (Resident 1). This failure had the potential to delay management of symptoms of respiratory distress during transport to GACH for Resident 1. Findings: On November 14, 2024, at 8:25 a.m., an unannounced visit was made to the facility to investigate a quality of care issue. On November 14, 2024, Resident 1's record was reviewed. A review of Resident 1 ' s admission Record, indicated, resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with a diagnosis which included asthma (a lung disease that can make it difficult to breath). A review of Resident 1 ' s Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool), dated September 25, 2024, indicated the resident ' s Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS - a cognitive assessment) score of 00 (cognitively impaired). A review of Resident 1 ' s…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-04 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to reevaluate the risks and effectiveness of interventions to address incident of falls, for one of three residents reviewed (Resident 1). This failure had the potential to result in further falls and injuries. Findings: On October 17, 2024, at 8:50 a.m., an unannounced visit was conducted at the facility to investigate quality care issues. A review of Resident 1 ' s admission Record, indicated Resident 1 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included cerebral infarction (when blood flow to the brain is disrupted due to problems with the blood vessels that supply it), hemiplegia (paralysis on one side of the body), hemiparesis (partial weakness), chronic heart failure (heart has trouble pumping blood through the body), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (condition that blocks air flow to the lung and makes it difficult to breathe), and cognitive communication deficit (difficulty paying attention to conversation, staying…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-30 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to report allegations of abuse involving Residents 1 and 2 to the California Department of Public Health (CDPH) within a 2-hour time frame. This failure had the potential to put residents at further risk of abuse and compromise their safety. Findings: On September 26, 2024, an unannounced visit was made to the facility for an allegation of abuse issue. A review of the abuse reporting form and Fax confirmation, dated, September 19, 2024, faxed at 10:49 a.m., indicated SSD reported, . (Resident 1) suspected abuser . (Resident 2) Victim . physical abuse . (CDPH), local police (&) State Ombudsman (advocate for residents, investigate complaints of abuse, neglect, or improper care) was notified. 1. A review of Resident 1 ' s medical records, titled, Face Sheet, indicated, resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with a diagnosis of congestive heart failure (Heart does not pump adequately), and unspecified psychosis (disorganized thought/behavior). A…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-09-13 · tag F0553 — failed to let residents help plan their care — patternAllow resident to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide residents and/or their representatives, the right to participate in the development of an individualized plan of care (an outlined care plan, including, goals and interventions, developed in collaboration with the resident and/or their representative) for three of three sampled residents (Residents 1, 2, and 5). This failure has the potential for the resident and or resident's representative not to be aware of the care plan developed for them to obtain their health goals. Findings: On August 26, 2024, an unannounced visit was conducted at the facility to investigate a quality-of-care issue. A review of Resident 1 ' s medical records titled admission Record, indicated, the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included fractured (lower) spine, with routine healing. Further review of records indicated Resident 1 was self-responsible (makes his own medical decisions). A review of Resident 2 ' s admission Record…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-13 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — patternProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide Ensure (Dietary nutritional supplement drinks) to four of four sampled residents (Residents 1, 2, 3, and 4) with their meals, in accordance with the physician order. This failure has the potential for the residents not to receive their nutritional needs. Findings: On August 27, 2024, an unannounced visit was conducted to investigate quality-of-care issue. On August 27, 2024, at 9:00 a.m., a concurrent interview with Resident 1, and observation of the resident ' s breakfast tray was conducted. Resident 1 stated, he should receive an Ensure with his meals, but he did not get one. The breakfast tray did not have an Ensure. A review of Resident 1 ' s medical records, indicated, the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included lower back fracture. A review of Resident 1 ' s physician orders, dated June 24, 2024, indicated, . ensure plus with meals . A review of Resident 1 ' s weights indicated the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-13 · tag F0551 — isolatedGive the resident's representative the ability to exercise the resident's rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility failed to ensure the authorized resident representative was provided the opportunity to be notified of the changes in the resident's medical condition and was provided with opportunities to participate in planning the resident's care. Resident 5's representative who has the durable power of attorney (DPOA) was not listed as the resident's emergency contact. This failure has the potential for the resident's authorized representative to be unaware of the changes in the resident's condition which could result in the representative not to be able to exercise her rights to advocate for the resident. Findings: On August 26, 2024, at 8:52 a.m., during an interview, Representative 2 stated, she was appointed by Resident 5, as the resident ' s DPOA. Representative 2 stated, she called the facility (on an unspecified date) to obtain information regarding the resident ' s care, but was told that she (Representative 2) was not listed as an emergency contact for Resident 5, and there was no information which…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-13 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Physician's orders for Life Sustaining Treatment (POLST-a written medical order from a physician, nurse practitioner or physician assistant that helps give people with serious illnesses more control over their own care by specifying the types of medical treatment they want to receive during serious illness) was consistent with the Advance directive (a living will that outlines personal, medical, end of life decisions, including an assigned decision maker) for one of three sampled residents (Resident 5). This failure placed the resident at risk of not receiving the treatment or care in accordance to their choice. Findings: On [DATE], at 2:30 p.m., an unannounced visit was made to the facility to investigate a quality of care issue. A review of Resident 5 ' s admission record indicated, the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included End Stage Renal Disease (The final stage of kidney disease). A review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-13 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify the representative of missed dialysis (A medical treatment that removes waste and excess fluids from blood due to kidney failure) treatment due to hypotension (low blood pressure) for one of three sampled residents (Resident 5). This failure resulted in Resident 5 ' s Representative not to be aware of the resident ' s missed dialysis treatment, which prevented the representative to exercise rights to be involve in the care for Resident 5. Findings: On August 26, 2024, at 2:30 p.m., an unannounced visit was made to the facility to investigate a quality care issue. A review of Resident 5 ' s medical records, titled, admission Record, indicated, the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included end stage renal disease (a medical condition in which a person's kidneys cease functioning on a permanent basis). A review of Resident 5 ' s Advanced Directive (a living will which appoints a medical decision…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-13 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolatedHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a grievance related to a lost denture was addressed in accordance to the facility policy and procedure for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1). This failure has the potential for the resident's concerns not to be investigated and resolved. Findings: On August 26, 2024, at 8:17 a.m., an interview was conducted with Resident 1 ' s representative, who stated, she reported the resident was missing his dentures to the Social Services Director (SSD) approximately 2-3 weeks prior, and the issues has not been resolved. A review of Resident 1 ' s medical records, indicated resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included vertebra T-11-T12 (lower back) fracture. On August 26, 2024, at 3:36 p.m., an interview was conducted with the SSD, and the SSD stated on August 15, 2024, Resident 1 ' s Representative, had reported that the resident ' s dentures were missing. The SSD stated on the same day, she followed up with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-28 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — patternProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a consistent skin assessment which would include accurate measurement of wounds, were conducted on a weekly basis for three of three sampled residents (Residents 1, 2, and 3). This failure has the potential to result in the facility not to be aware of the changes in the condition of the pressure injuries subsequently delaying the provision of appropriate treatment. Findings: On June 11, 2024, at 8:11 a.m., an unannounced visit was conducted to investigate quality care issues. 1. A review of Resident 1's medical records titled, admission Record, indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included malignant prostate cancer (spread to other parts of the body), and unspecified dementia (severe cognitive impairment). The record further indicated the resident was discharged from the facility on May 30, 2024. On June 11, 2024, at 8:40 a.m., during an interview with Treatment Nurse (Tx nurse) 1, the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-28 · tag F0552 — isolatedEnsure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to obtain treatment consent for a prescribed psychotropic medication (Seroquel- medication to treat mental or mood disorders) from the resident's responsible party prior to use, for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1). This failure has the potential for the responsible party not to be involved in the planning of care for Resident 1. Findings: On June 11, 2024, at 8:10 a.m., unannounced visit was made to the facility to investigate quality care issues. A review of Resident 1 ' s admission records, titled, admission Record, indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included dementia (cognitive impairment). A review of Minimum Data Set (MDS- a standardized assessment tool that measures health status in nursing home residents), dated May 7, 2024, Section C: Cognitive Status indicated the resident's Brief Interview for Mental Status ({BIMS-An interview for cognitive intactness), was assessed as Severely…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-28 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident's representative was informed of the changes in one of three sampled residents' (Resident 1) skin condition. This failure has the potential for the resident or the resident's representative not to be aware of the changes which could result in the representatives not to be able to exercise their rights to be involved in planning the care for Resident 1. Findings: A review of Resident 1 ' s admission records titled, admission Record, indicated, the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included dementia (cognitive impairment). A review of Minimum Data Set (MDS- a standardized assessment tool that measures health status in nursing home residents), dated May 7, 2024, Section C: Cognitive Status indicated the resident's Brief Interview for Mental Status ({BIMS-An interview for cognitive intactness), was assessed as Severely impaired. A review of Resident 1 ' s, History & Physical, dated, April 23, 2024, at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-11 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify law enforcement when reporting allegations of financial abuse involving one of three sampled residents (Resident 1). This failure had the potential for allegations of financial abuse reported by Resident 1, not to be investigated which increased the risk for further abuse on Resident 1. Findings: On May 13, 2024, at 9:00 a.m., an unannounced visit was made to the facility to investigate an allegation of financial abuse. On May 13, 2024, at 1:56 p.m., an interview was conducted with Resident 1. The resident stated he believed his family members were accessing his (Personal) bank account and stealing his funds. Resident 1 further stated, his family members canceled his debit card and were claiming it was lost or stolen. A review of Resident 1 ' s medical records titled Face Sheet, indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with a primary diagnosis of Encephalopathy (A group of conditions that cause brain dysfunction). A review…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-11 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a dedicated 1:1 sitter (caregiver assigned to monitor one resident), was provided for two of two residents (Residents 1 and 2). In addition, the facility failed to get a physician order for a 1:1 monitoring for one of two residents (Resident 2). These failures had the potential for the two residents to be involved in another altercation which could result in serious physical injury. Findings: On May 13, 2024, at 9:00 a.m., an unannounced visit was conducted to investigate a resident-to-resident altercation incident involving Residents 1 and 2. A review of Resident 1 ' s Face Sheet, indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included encephalopathy (A group of conditions that affect brain function). A review of Resident 1's BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status – mental cognition assessment tool) indicated a score of 05 (Severe cognitive impairment). A review of Resident 1 ' s physician orders dated,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-03 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to report an allegation of financial abuse within two hours to California Department of Public Health (CDPH) after the facility was made aware of the allegation, for one of five residents (Resident 1). This failure had the potential to result in further financial abuse for Resident 1, affecting the resident's emotional, and psychosocial well-being. Findings: On May 15, 2024, at 10:07 a.m., CDPH received a fax (facsimile - telephonic transmission of scanned-in printed material) report of a complaint involving misappropriation of property (a type of financial abuse) for Resident 1. On May 29, 2024, at 9:20 a.m., an unannounced visit to the facility was conducted to investigate a misappropriation of property issue. On May 29, 2024, at 9:40 a.m., during an interview with Resident 1, Resident 1 stated, she noticed unauthorized charges on her debit card (bank card) about the end of April 2024. Resident 1 stated she informed the Social Service Assistant (SSA). A…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-03 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident was monitored after the resident reported an allegation of financial abuse, for one of five residents (Resident 1). This failure had the potential for the staff to be unaware of the effect on the resident's emotional and psychosocial well-being. Findings: On May 29, 2024, at 9:40 a.m., during an interview with Resident 1, Resident 1 stated, she noticed unauthorized charges on her debit card (bank card) about the end of April 2024. Resident 1 stated she informed the Social Service Assistant (SSA). A review of Resident 1's admission Record, indicated, Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included depression (a medical illness that negatively affects how a person feels, thinks, and handles daily activities). A review of Resident 1's Minimum data Set (an assessment tool) dated March 8, 2024, indicated a Brief Interview for Mental Status (used to identify the cognitive condition of a resident) score of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-16 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure adequate supervision was provided, for one of three residents (Resident 2) who required close monitoring and supervision, when Resident 2 was left unsupervised during care. This failure had the potential to put other residents in the facility at risk for further aggressive behaviors by Resident 2. Findings: On April 18, 2024, at 9:30 a.m., an unannounced visit was conducted at the facility to investigate an allegation of physical abuse. On April 18, 2024, at 1:17 p.m., during an observation of Resident 2's room, Resident 2 was observed to be alert, lying in bed, and watching television. No staff were observed at the bedside. On April 18, 2024, at 1:32 p.m., no staff were present in Resident 2's room, and no staff were observed entering the resident's room. Resident 2 was awake and alert in the room. On April 18, 2024, at 1:46 p.m., Resident 2 was in the room with no staff at the bedside. On April 18, 2024, at 1:50 p.m., Resident 2…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-10 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to report an allegation of physical abuse within 2 hours to California Department of Public Health (CDPH) after the allegation was made, for one of 3 residents (Resident 1). This failure had the potential to result in further abuse for Resident 1, affecting the resident's physical, emotional, and psychosocial well-being. Findings: On March 19, 2024, at 10:30 a.m., an unannounced visit to the facility was conducted to investigate an allegation of abuse. A review of Resident 1's record indicated, Resident 1 was admitted on [DATE], with a diagnosis which included cognitive communication deficit (difficulty with any aspect of communication that is affected by disruption of cognition), urinary tract infection (UTI – an infection of any part of the urinary system), and major depressive disorder (a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest.) During a review of Resident 1's Minimum data Set (MDS- an assessment tool) dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-09 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to perform a background check for a direct care employee prior to employment. This failure had the potential to expose residents to abuse and exploitation. Findings: On March 5, 2024, at 4:20 p.m., during an interview with Resident 1, The resident stated about three nights ago, a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA1) came into her room and tossed her personal items on the bed. She stated she said something to the nurse who did not really respond to her comment. She stated the following night, CNA1 and CNA2 came into her room. She stated the staff moved all her personal items, including her water and call light were moved. She stated CNA2 was mean. She stated the nurses began turning her and handling her without telling her what was going on. She stated her call light was removed and when she asked how she would get help if needed, she was instructed to yell. A review of CNA's employee records indicated the CNA's certification is current and the employee received abuse training on hire. The employee file noted to lack a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-09 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to develop a care plan with interventions for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) receiving psychotropic medications. This failure has the potential to result in Resident 1 not receiving interventions to promote the resident's optimal level of function. Findings: A review of Resident 1's admission record indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], readmitted on [DATE]. The resident noted to have diagnoses that included TIA (Transient Ischemic Attack- interruption of blood flow to brain), anxiety disorder, hemiplegia (paralysis) affecting right dominant side, urinary tract infection, & fracture of head of left radius (left elbow). The record indicated the resident was discharged on December 2, 2023. A review of Resident 1's physician progress note dated March 10, 2023, indicated an active problem of major depressive disorder, recurrent episode. The progress note indicated the resident was alert and oriented. The progress note…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-09 · tag F0712 — isolatedEnsure that the resident and his/her doctor meet face-to-face at all required visits.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the physician or designee visited one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) every 30 days. This failure had the potential to result in Resident 1 not maintaining or achieving their highest practical level of function. Findings: A review of Resident 1's admission record indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], readmitted on [DATE]. The resident noted to have diagnoses that included TIA (Transient Ischemic Attack- interruption of blood flow to brain), anxiety disorder, hemiplegia (paralysis) affecting right dominant side, urinary tract infection, & fracture of head of left radius (left elbow). The record indicated the resident was discharged on December 2, 2023. A review of Resident 1's records indicated the resident was seen by a physician or designate on March 10th, April 18th, May 8th & 19th, September 5th and 25th, 2023. The records did not indicate provider visits for June, July, August, nor November 2023. The resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-04 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1), the physician order to provide Resident 1 with a trapeze (a device to assist patients in transferring from one surface to another, reducing the risk of injury) was followed. This failure had the potential for the resident to have limited mobility, and being unable to transfer from one surface to another. Findings: On April 4, 2024, at 9:40 a.m., an unannounced visit was conducted at the facility to investigate a quality of care issue. On April 4, 2024, at 12:03 p.m, during a concurrent observation and interview with Resident 1 in her room, she stated, she wanted a trapeze to help her get up. Resident 1 stated, she spoke with the Social Service Director about it. There was no trapeze observed in Resident 1's room. A review of Resident 1's admission RECORD, dated April 4, 2024, indicated, Resident 1 was admitted at the facility on July 28, 2023, with diagnoses which included weakness and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (a lung disease that block…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-02-22 · tag F0623 — patternProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a copy of the written notice of transfer or discharge was provided to the long-term care Ombudsman for 30 of 50 patients, who were transferred and discharged from the facility in between [DATE], and [DATE], in accordance with the facility policy and procedure. This failure had the potential to result in the discharged residents experiencing an inappropriate transfer or discharge and to not have the opportunity to speak with the Ombudsman to advocate in protecting the resident's rights from being inappropriately transferred or discharged . Findings: On [DATE], at 11 a.m., an unannounced visit was conducted at the facility to investigate an admission and discharge issue. A review of Resident 1's admission record indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included femur fracture (thigh bone), depression, and diabetes mellitus (inability to regulate blood sugar). A review of 1's Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-19 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide repositioning for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) when Resident 1 was not offered repositioning. This failure had the potential to result in Resident 1 sustaining a pressure-related skin injury. Findings: A review of Resident 1's admission record indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included diabetes mellitus, weakness, and major depressive disorder. On December 27, 2023, during an observation, at 7:13 a.m., Resident 1 noted to be sitting up in her bed with the head of bed elevated on her back. On December 27, 2023, during an observation, at 10:05 a.m., Resident 1 noted to be sitting up in her bed with the head of bed elevated on her back. On December 27, 2023, during an interview with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 1, at 10:20 a.m., she stated she has worked at the facility for about 5 years. She stated residents are to be repositioned every 2 hours. She stated she has…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-12 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure skin evaluation was conducted on admission for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1). In addition, the facility failed to ensure monitoring and treatment for non-pressure skin injuries were provided to Resident 1. These failures had the potential to result in delayed provision of care and treatment for the resident's skin condition, which placed the resident at risk for infection and complications. Findings: On November 30, 2023, at 8:40 a.m., an unannounced visit was conducted at the facility to investigate a quality-of-care issue. A review of Resident 1's admission record indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included unspecified fracture (break in continuity) of right femur (thigh bone), lack of coordination, chronic kidney disease (long standing disease of the kidneys), thrombosis (formation of blood clot within the blood vessel) of unspecified deep veins of lower extremity (both legs from…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-12 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure nutritional assessment were completed on admission for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1). In addition, weekly weights were not completed in accordance with the policy and procedure. These failures placed Resident 1 at risk for compromised nutrition, a delay in necessary treatment and services, which has the potential to result in further decline of the resident's health status. Findings: On November 30, 2023, at 8:40 a.m., an unannounced visit was conducted at the facility to investigate a quality-of-care issue. A review of Resident 1's admission record indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included unspecified fracture (break in continuity) of right femur (thigh bone), lack of coordination, chronic kidney disease (long standing disease of the kidneys), thrombosis (formation of blood clot within the blood vessel) of unspecified deep veins of lower extremity (both legs from hip to the toes)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-08 · tag F0638 — isolatedAssure that each resident’s assessment is updated at least once every 3 months.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, for one (Resident 1) of three sampled residents, the facility failed to complete the quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment (MDS - Resident Assessment and care guide tool) according to the regulation. This failure had the potential to result in the delayed assessment of residents' needs, goals of care and inability to monitor each residents' progress over time. Findings: Review of Resident 1's MDS assessment indicated section C of the last quarterly MDS assessment was completed June 9, 2023. During an interview and concurrent record review on November 7, 2023, at 3:10 p.m., the MDS Coordinator was made aware that section C of the quarterly MDS was not completed. MDS coordinator stated, there should be a BIMS [brief interview for mental status] score for September. When asked what the risk was of not completing the quarterly BIMS, MDS coordinator stated BIMS assesses for cognitive status of the patient; we would have missed the changes in his cognitive status. The most recent BIMS is in June of 2023. We had one person to handle the whole building…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-27 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to report an allegation of sexual abuse within two hours to the California Department of Public Health (CDPH) after the allegation was made for one of three residents (Resident A). This failure had the potential to result in further harm to Resident A ' s physical, emotional, and psychosocial (social factors and individual thoughts and behaviors) wellbeing. Findings: On June 15, 2023, at 8:03 a.m., CDPH received a report on an allegation of sexual abuse regarding Resident A and the Hospice Nurse (HN). On June 15, 2023, at 3:15 p.m., an unannounced visit to the facility was conducted to investigate an allegation of sexual abuse. A review of Resident A ' s medical record indicated Resident A was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. A review of Resident A ' s Progress Notes titled, Alert Note, dated June 14, 2023, at 6:15 p.m., indicated .patient stated she was raped, this nurse comforted and reassured patient, and let her know a report would be filed .was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-27 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure for one of three residents (Resident A), receiving hospice care (focuses on the care, comfort, and quality of life of a person with a serious illness who is approaching the end of life), was assessed on a regular basis for constipation and received medications as ordered. This failure resulted in Resident A, experiencing constipation, as well as impact her physical, mental, and psychosocial (interrelation of social factors, individual thought, and behavior) well-being. Findings: On June 15, 2023, at 3:15 p.m., an unannounced visit to the facility was conducted for a facility reported incident. On June 15, 2023, at 4:00 p.m., an interview was conducted with Resident A. Resident A stated, she remembered exactly what happened to her, the Hospice Nurse (HN) inserted something into her rectum, and it was very painful. Resident A stated, she did not feel safe, and was afraid someone else may try to put something in her rectum. A review of Resident A '…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-26 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to report an outbreak of COVID-19 (An infectious disease, which affects the respiratory system, accompanied by symptoms of fever, cough and shortness of breath, caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus) to California Department of Public Health (CDPH). This failure resulted in CDPH to be unaware of the outbreak which caused a delay in investigation of the communicable disease outbreak. Findings: On September 26, 2023, at 10:15 a.m. an unannounced visit was made to the facility to investigate a quality care issue. Concurrently, the Administrator (Admin) reported having Covid-19 positive residents. The Administrator stated he was not sure if the COVID-19 cases had been reported by the Infection Prevention (IP) nurse to CDPH. On September 26, 2023, at 10:36 a.m. during an interview with the IP nurse, the IP nurse verified the facility currently had eight positive Covid-19 residents, and five Covid-19 positive staff members. The first Covid-19 positive…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-25 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to report an allegation of abuse within 2 hours to California Department of Public Health (CDPH) after the allegation was made, for two of two residents (Residents 1 and 2). This failure had the potential to result in further abuse for Residents 1 and 2 affecting the residents physical, emotional, and psychosocial well-being. Findings: On September 19, 2023, at 8:50 a.m., an unannounced visit to the facility was conducted to investigate the allegations of abuse. 1. A review of Resident 1's record indicated, Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included intracerebral hemorrhage (brain bleed). During a review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool), dated August 17, 2023, the MDS indicated a Brief Interview for Mental Status (evaluation aimed at evaluating cognition in elderly patients) score of 0 (cognitively impaired). A review of Resident 1's General Progress Note, dated September 11, 2023 at 3:36…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-09-07 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — patternMake sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the volume of the call light was audible enough to alert staff when residents call for assistance. This failure had the potential for the staff not to be aware of the needs of residents thereby delaying provision of needed care. Findings: On July 12, 2023, an unannounced visit was made to the facility to investigate a patient's rights concern. On July 12, 2023, at 3:11 p.m., an interview was conducted with Resident 1. Resident 1 stated, It takes staff a long time to answer my (Call) light, The resident stated, Sometimes they don't even respond. A review of Resident 1's medical records, indicated, Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included diabetes mellitus (A disease where blood sugar is too high), paraplegia (paralysis of lower body), weakness, and muscle wasting. On July 12, 2023, at 11:00 a.m., an observation was made of the call light system on the Dunes Unit, at the nursing station with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-15 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure, when the alarm was triggered, the staff checked that no resident left the building. This failure had resulted to Resident A who had an exit seeking behavior (elopement risk), left the facility without the staff being aware of it, increasing the Resident A's risk for accidents. Findings: On April 14, 2023, at 2:45 p.m., an unannounced visit to the facility was conducted to investigate an accident issue. A review of Resident A's record indicated, Resident A was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included dementia (memory loss). During a review of Resident A's Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool), dated October 6, 2022, the MDS indicated Resident A had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (a tool used to screen and identify the cognitive condition of residents) score of 3 (severe cognitive impairment). During a review of Resident A's Care Plan (CP), dated September 28, 2020, the CP indicated, .Exit seeking…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-06-23 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — patternHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a copy of the Advance Directive (AD - a written statement of an individual's wishes regarding his/her medical treatment) was available in the resident's records, for three of 10 residents reviewed for AD (Residents 11, 41, and 55). This failure had the potential for Residents 11, 41, and 55's AD to not be readily available to the staff and the physician, making them unaware of, and unable to honor the resident's wishes regarding their medical treatment. Findings: 1. Resident 55's record was reviewed. Resident 55 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included cancer (disease in which some of the body's cells grow uncontrollably and spread to other parts of the body) of the neck. During a review of Resident 55's document titled Social Services Assessment and History (SSAH), dated February 25, 2022, the SSAH indicated, .Advance Care Planning .Does the patient make his/her own decisions? .No .Does the patient/patient's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-06-23 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the following: 1. Resident 1's splint (a rigid device to help with range of motion and to prevent or maintain range of motion) to the hand was applied daily for resident as ordered by the physician; and 2. Resident 52's skin lesion to the right forearm was assessed, monitored, and referred to the physician for further evaluation and treatment; These failures had the potential to compromise the health of Residents 1 and 52 and to lead to the development of complications in their overall health condition. Findings: On June 19, 2023, at 10:05 a.m., Resident 1 was observed in the room, sitting down in her wheelchair, awake and alert. Resident 1 was noted with left hand, fingers, and wrist hyperflexed. Resident 1 was observed without a splint or brace (device used to support or hold a body part still) on her left hand. In a concurrent interview with Resident 1, she stated she had a stroke (occurs when the blood supply to part of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-06-23 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — patternImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure psychotropic medications (any drug that affects brain activities associated with mental processes and behavior) were not administered without adequate monitoring for the targeted behaviors for which the medications were used for the residents. This failure had the potential to inadequately track progress toward improvement of the resident's status and for the facility to not able to measure the effectiveness of psychotropic medications. Findings: Starting on June 20, 2023, the medication records the four residents (Resident 40, 41, 42, and 46) were reviewed and the following was noted in regard to the monitoring of the targeted behavior(s) for which the psychotropic medications were prescribed for each resident: There was a physician order on December 5, 2022, for Ativan (psychotropic medication to treat symptoms of anxiety) 0.5 mg (milligram - unit of measurement) with the direction to give the resident one tablet by mouth two times day for anxiety manifested by current health concerns for Resident 40; There was a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-06-23 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — patternEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed for one of one resident reviewed for dialysis (Resident 26), to ensure Sevelamer- (phosphate binder-it binds phosphates in the stomach and prevents them from being absorbed into the body) was administered according to physician order. This failure had the potential to reult for Resident 26 to have elevated phophorus [mineral that causes body changes that pull calcium out of the bones] level. Findings: On June 19, 2023, at 3:13 p.m., during an interview with Resident 26, Resident 26 stated he was not given phosphate binder medication before meals (breakfast. lunch, and dinner). Resident 26 stated I don't get them as ordered. Resident 26 stated licensed nurses would tell him, I can not find them. Resident 2 stated he received Sevelamer twice a day instead of three times a day. During a review of Resident 26's Order Summary Report, dated February 14, 2023, indicated, .Sevelamer Carbonate Oral tablet 800 MG (milligram -unit of measurement) Give 2400 mg daily before meals for Excessive Phosphorus . During a review of Resident 26's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-06-23 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — patternEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the menu was followed during the tray line on June 21, 2023 when: 1. Resident 1 on regular CCHO (consistent carbohydrate) diet (a diet used in the treatment for diabetes) received a wheat roll, and a grilled cheese on white bread; 2. Resident 4 on regular CCHO diet received three (3) small plastic cups of brown sugar: and 3. Resident 214 on regular mechanical soft (easy chew) diet received fresh pineapples. These failures had a potential to result in compromising the medical and nutritional status for Residents, 1,4, and 214. Findings: On June 21, 2023, at 12:15 p.m., a review of the undated facility document titled, (name of company), Week 4, Day 25, Cycle P Lunch, was reviewed. The document indicated the following may be given: - for CCHO (Controlled carbohydrate) diet, .four (4) ounce (oz - a unit of measurement) grilled honey mustard ham steak .one half (1/2) cup whipped sweet potatoes .1/2 cup green peas .one (1)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-06-23 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interview and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, and distribute food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety when: 1. Expired foods and open foods without date were discarded and readily available for use. This failure had the potential to cause foodborne illnesses in a medically vulnerable resident population who consumed food in the facility. 2. Metal sheet pans and plastic storage containers were stacked and stored wet; and 3. Dietary staff personal belongings were observed in the food preparation station. These failures had the potential to contaminate the food and cause foodborne illnesses in a medically vulnerable resident population who consumed food in the facility. Findings: 1. On June 19, 2023, at 9:53 a.m., during the initial kitchen tour with Food Safety Director (FSD), the following food items were found stored in the kitchen readily available for use: - Three (3) loaves of sliced white bread with a best if used by date of June 16, 2023; - One (1) open bag of bun (bread) with no open date; - Two (2)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-23 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that plan of care for repositioning was implemented for one of 18 residents reviewed (Resident 60). This failure had the potential to result in skin breakdown for Resident 60. Findings: On June 19, 2023, at 11:36 a.m., Resident 60 was observed lying on her left side, facing the window. On June 19, 2023, at 12:29 p.m., Resident 60 was observed lying on her left side, facing the window. Resident 60 stated she had been on her left side since last night. Resident 60 stated after her therapy she was placed on the same position, again and again and again. Resident 60 further stated she was only repositioned every time she had diaper change. Resident 60 was observed on supine position (lying face upward) on the following dates and time: 1. On June 20, 2023 - 9:17 a.m.; 2. On June 20, 2023 - 9: 25 a.m.; 3. On June 20, 2023 - 11:49 a.m.; and 4. On June 22, 2023 - 7: 25 a.m. A review of Resident 60's record indicated Resident 60 was admitted…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-06-23 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the plan of care (POC) was reviewed and revised, for one of 18 residents reviewed (Resident 36), when Resident 36 had a decline in range of motion (ROM - the extent to which a part of the body can be moved around a joint). This failure had the potential to result in further decline of Resident 36's range of motion. Findings: On June 19, 2023, at 11:23 a.m., Resident 36 was observed lying in bed. Resident 36's left foot was extended. Resident 36 stated he did not received physical therapy for a while. A review of Resident 36's record indicated Resident 36 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses of left hemiparalysis (weakness on one side of the body). A review of Resident 36's Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool), dated April 10, 2023, indicated a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 (cognitively intact). During a review of Resident 36's Care Plan (CP), dated September 7, 2021, the CP indicated,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-23 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed for one of one resident reviewed for accidents (Resident 11), to ensure: 1. An assessment was conducted and a care plan was developed for Resident 11's wandering behavior; and 2. The physician was notified for Resident 11's wandering behavior. These failures had the potential to result in injuries for Resident 11. Findings: On June 19, 2023, at 3:43 p.m., Resident 11 was observed wheeling herself in a wheelchair. In a concurrent interview with Resident 11, she stated she went to other resident's room for socialization. On June 23, 2023, at 10:55 a.m., a concurrent observation and interview was conducted with Resident 13. Resident 13 was observed in bed, awake, and verbally responsive. Resident 13 stated Resident 11, in her wheelchair, would come to his room all the time. He stated Resident 11 would eat the food and sleep in the bed of another resident (Resident 6). He stated the staff were aware of the incidents and would remove Resident 11 from his room on multiple occasions. On June 23, 2023, at 11 a.m.,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-23 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure professional standards for quality of care were followed for hemodialysis (HD- process of removing waste from the blood with the use of a machine) for one of one resident reviewed for dialysis (Resident 26), when: 1. The licensed nurse did not assess Resident 26 before and after hemodialysis on mulitple occasions. This failure increased the potential for delayed detection, reporting, and/or management of complications from the hemodialysis access sites; and 2. The licensed nurse did not communicate with the physician regarding Resident 26's missed dialysis treatment. This failure had the potential for Resident 26's physician to be unaware of the resident's medical condition after missing dialysis treatment. Findings: 1. On June 19, 2023, at 3:13 p.m., a concurrent observation and interview with Resident 26 was conducted. Resident 26's dressing on the hemodialysis access site was observed being removed by staff. The Resident 26's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-23 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure provision of pharmacy met the needs of the residents when expired, discontinued, discharged resident's medications were not removed and stored in the medication storage areas along with active medications. This failure had the potential for residents to receive inaccurate, ineffective medications. Findings: On June 20, 2023, at 1:45 p.m., during the medication room inspection in Oasis Nursing Station with LVN 2, it was noted there were following expired medications in the medication refrigerator: Eleven boxes of containing ten 0.5-ml (milliliter - unit of measurement) prefilled FLUAD (flu vaccine) syringes; and Three bags of vancomycin (injectable antibiotic for infection) 500 mg (milligram - unit of measurement) in 100 ml of fluid with the expiration date of May 29, 2023. Also, there were following medications for a discharged resident on the cabinet shelf along with other active medications: One 30-gram Nystatin cream (antifungal cream); One 22-gram mupirocin (antifungal ointment) ointment 2%; One…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-23 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document and record review, the facility failed to ensure medication irregularities were identified during monthly medication regimen review (MRR) by the Consultant Pharmacist (CP) and recommendations were made to ensure appropriate use of medications for one of five residents reviewed. Resident 40 received a medication not recommended for use in the adults 65 years or older by the American Geriatric Society's Beers Criteria. This failure had the potential to expose the resident to adverse effects such as increased risk of falls, delirium, and dementia. Findings: On June 20, 2023, Resident 40's medical record was reviewed, and the following was noted: The resident was a [AGE] year-old male who was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included hypotension (low blood pressure), major depressive disorder and unspecified psychosis; There was a physician order on June 17, 2023, for hydroxyzine (medication for anxiety or allergic symptoms) 50 mg (milligram - unit of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-06-23 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from unnecessary medications when one of five residents reviewed (Resident 49) was receiving four different pain medications as needed without specific parameters indicating which pain medication to be given ahead of others based on the level of pain perceived by the resident. This failure had the potential for the resident to unnecessarily receive stronger narcotic pain medication for minimal pain. Findings: On June 20, 2023, Resident 49's medical record was reviewed, and the following was noted: The resident was a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included primary osteoarthritis (joint pain), hereditary and idiopathic neuropathy (inherited and unknown nerve pain); There was a physician order on June 20, 2023, for naproxen (pain medication) 500 mg (milligram - unit of measurement) with the direction to give the resident one tablet by mouth two times a day for pain; There…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-23 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure for one of three residents reviewed for choices (Resident 8), resident's food preference was honored. This failure had the potential for Resident 8 not being able to enjoy her preferred food, resulting in decrease oral intake. Findings: On June 19, 2023, at 2:35 p.m., Resident 8 was interviewed. Resident 8 stated two or three days ago she requested for beef soup. She further stated she was not served the beef soup and was given a corn chowder instead. A review of Resident 8's record indicated, Resident 8 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (a breathing related problem). During a review of Resident 8's Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool), dated April 26, 2023, the MDS indicated, .Brief Interview of Mental Status .Score of 15 (cognitively intact) . During a review of Resident 8's Care Plan (CP), dated April 25, 2023, the CP indicated, .Nutritional Status .Goal .Will…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-23 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure standard infection control practices were implemented when: 1. A staff member (CNA - Certified Nursing Assistant) did not perform hand hygiene after picking up a finished meal tray from the resident's room; and 2. An uncovered urinal (receptacle used for urinating) with half-filled urine in the resident's room was hanging on the side of the trash can next to the resident's bed. These failures had the potential to spread infection and comprise the overall health status of the residents residing in the facility. Findings: 1. On June 19, 2023, at 12:20 p.m., during lunch meal observation, a staff member was seen leaving Resident 50's room and carrying a meal tray for a resident. The staff member was observed to place the meal tray on the meal cart in the hallway before returning to Resident 50's room. The staff member proceeded to care for a resident in room [ROOM NUMBER] C bed without performing hand hygiene. On June 19, 2023, at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-06-23 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — isolatedEnsure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure in-services provided was sufficient when one certified nursing assistant (CNA) did not complete twelve hours of in-service trainings for the year 2022. This failure had the potential to affect the quality of care and services provided to the residents. Findings: A review of the facility's In-Service log for the year 2022, indicated, CNA 1 had completed three hours of the 12 hour-mandatory in-service for the CNAs. On June 23, 2023, at 11:30 a.m., during a concurrent interview and record review with the Director of Staff Development (DSD), she stated she provided education to the staff. The DSD stated, CNAs should be receiving 24 hours of in-services per year. She stated CNA 1, should have been provided 24 hours of in-service per year instead of three hours. The DSD stated the facility did not have a policy and procedure regarding in-service trainings for CNAs.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
“Disputed” is CMS’s own flag, not our reading: the CMS deficiency file records whether the home has formally contested a citation, and we reproduce that. IDR is Informal Dispute Resolution, run by the state survey agency that wrote the citation; IIDR is Independent Informal Dispute Resolution, a separate process before an outside entity, available when CMS has proposed a civil money penalty. They are different processes and we mark them differently. Two things to hold at once. A disputed citation is still a citation — it was written by a surveyor, it stands on the record unless and until it is changed, and we neither hide it nor discount it. And we cannot tell you how the dispute came out: CMS publishes that a citation is under dispute, not the outcome, so a tag marked here may since have been upheld, reduced, or deleted, and an unmarked tag may have been disputed and resolved before this file was cut. Ask the home what it disputed and why — it is entitled to tell you, and the answer is often the most informative thing on this page.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$74,424 in federal fines across 2 penalties. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.
- $16,675 — penalty dated 2024-05-16
- $57,749 — penalty dated 2024-01-12
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-01-27 for 75 days
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ownership Data Not Available |
The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $309K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in CA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 555339. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-04-24, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.