Desert Regional Medical Center D/P SNF

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

71.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 184 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 42.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 132 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.37 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 62% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 35% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 32 beds and averages 18.8 residents a day — about 59% occupied, or roughly 13 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 8.10 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 5.26 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.61 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 6.61 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 8.69 on weekdays — 24% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 5.83 to 3.82 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 16% is below the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

22 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 11 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · Lcited before2024-02-29 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, and serve food in a sanitary manner, in accordance with professional standards for food service safety, as evidenced by: 1. Rodent droppings and evidence of nesting (collection of clutter, trash, and debris) was found in the cooking line area of the kitchen, as well as an accumulation of grease and black grime and food, this had the potential to transmit disease to patients by contaminating food and food contact surfaces. In addition, a convection oven (oven that has fans to circulate air around food), a steamer, three ovens, one fryer and a broiler had an accumulation of grease and food grime build-up. This had the potential to attract pests and for microorganism (a microscopic organism, especially a bacterium, virus, or fungus) growth that could be inadvertently transferred to food. 2. The industrial stand mixer had crusted dry substances on the protection grate, the steam jacketed kettles had crusted yellow food inside the kettle, and the convection oven had black and yellow grime build-up…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-06-11 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
  Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure food was served at temperatures and with palatability consistent with resident preferences for four of 21 residents reviewed for food service (Residents 11, 18, 39, and 40).This failure resulted in residents receiving meals that were not served at expected temperatures and had the potential to diminish resident satisfaction with meals and adversely affect residents' enjoyment of dining and food intake.Findings: On June 8, 2026, at 10:08 a.m., an interview was conducted with Resident 11 in his room. Resident 11 stated the food was bland. On June 8, 2026, at 11:38 a.m., an interview was conducted with Resident 18 in his room. Resident 18 stated the chicken was bland and most meals were served cold. On June 9, 2026, at 9:12 a.m., an interview was conducted with Resident 39 in his room. Resident 39 stated the food needed to be warmer when it arrived. On June 9, 2026, at 9:21 a.m., an interview was conducted with Resident 40 in her room. Resident 40 stated all meals were lukewarm. On June 10, 2026, at 11:48 a.m. a test…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-11 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify the physician when blood glucose (sugar) levels were below 70 mg/dL (milligram per deciliter) as ordered by the physician, for two of three residents reviewed for notification of change (Residents 36 and 39). This failure had the potential to delay physician evaluation, treatment, and modification of medical interventions related to hypoglycemia (a blood sugar level below normal). Findings: 1. Resident 36's record was reviewed. Resident 36 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included diabetes mellitus (abnormal blood sugar level). The care plan titled, Unstable Blood Glucose, dated June 6, 2026, indicated, .Diabetes Mellitus.blood glucose will be managed as per physicians' orders.interventions.report to physician any hypoglycemic reactions for intervention. The physician's order dated June 7, 2026, indicated, .Humalog (type of insulin) sliding scale (a numerical scale for administration of insulin).rapid acting for…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-06-11 · tag F0655 — isolated
  Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop a person-centered baseline care plan for one of three residents reviewed for unnecessary medications (Resident 39) when interventions related to anticoagulation therapy were not included in the resident's baseline care plan. This failure had the potential to result in staff not consistently implementing and monitoring interventions related to anticoagulation therapy (treatment with blood-thinning medication), including monitoring for adverse effects and changes in the resident's condition. Findings:A review of Resident 39's record was conducted. Resident 39 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included atrial fibrillation (abnormal heart rhythm).The physician's order dated June 7, 2026, indicated, .apixaban (a blood thinner used to reduce the risk of blood clots and stroke in residents with atrial fibrillation) .Indication.atrial fibrillation.A review of Resident 39's baseline care plan indicated there were no care plan…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-06-11 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure physician ordered hypoglycemia management (treatment for low blood glucose [blood sugar]) was implemented and documented for two of three residents reviewed for diabetic management (Residents 36 and 39). This failure had the potential to result in inadequate management of hypoglycemic episodes (an episode of low blood glucose) and negatively affect residents' health and well-being. Findings: 1. Resident 36's record was reviewed. Resident 36 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included diabetes mellitus (abnormal blood sugar level). The care plan titled, Unstable Blood Glucose, dated June 6, 2026, indicated, .Diabetes Mellitus.blood glucose (sugar) will be managed as per physicians' orders.interventions.report to physician any hypoglycemic reactions for intervention. The physician's order dated June 7, 2026, indicated, .Humalog (type of insulin) sliding scale (a numerical scale for administration of insulin) .rapid acting…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-08-21 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe and sanitary food preparation and storage practices in the kitchen when: 1. One bag containing a yellow and orange colored liquid was stored in the walk-in refrigerator unlabeled and undated. 2. One package of small, round and brown dessert item was stored in the portable walk-in freezer unlabeled and undated. 3. One sandwich was stored in the resident's refrigerator inside the nourishment room unlabeled, undated, and readily available for use. These failures had the potential to cause foodborne illness (stomach illness acquired from ingesting contaminated food) in a medically vulnerable population of 23 residents who receive food in the facility. Findings: 1. On August 18, 2025, at 10:15 a.m., a concurrent observation and interview was conducted with the Dietary Services Supervisor (DSS) in the walk-in refrigerator. A bag with yellow and orange liquid was observed unlabeled and undated. The DSS stated the bag contained liquid eggs which usually came in two bags in a box and further stated, the bag…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-08-21 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — widespread
  Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure proper disposal of garbage when multiple debris items were found on the ground outside of the designated container and not stored in the appropriate container. This failure had the potential to attract pests and cause infection control issues.Findings:On August 18, 2025, at 11:05 a.m., during a concurrent observation and interview with the Dietary Services Supervisor (DSS), in front of the dumpster storage area, multiple debris items including, wood scraps, pallets, and cardboard were observed on the ground and surrounding area. The DSS stated there should not be any debris, wood scraps, pallets, or carboard on the ground and around the dumpster compactor machine. The DSS stated these items could attract pests and could cause infection control issues.On August 20, 2025, at 12:15 p.m., during an interview with the Registered Dietitian (RD), the RD stated the dumpster compactor machine area should be kept clean and inspected daily to ensure no garbage, wood scraps, or cardboard boxes were left on the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-08-21 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure for six of 11 residents reviewed for Advance Directive (AD - written statement of a person's wishes regarding medical treatment) (Residents 1, 5, 10, 29, 32 and 39) that: 1. Resident 5's AD was accessible in the resident's chart; and2. The facility followed up with Residents 1, 20, 29, 32 and 39 and/or Resident Representative (RP) regarding formulation of an AD.This failure had the potential to result in the ADs for Residents 1, 5, 10, 29, 32 and 39 not being readily accessible to staff and physicians, which could lead to the residents' wishes regarding medical treatment being unknown and ultimately not honored. Findings: 1. On August 19, 2025, at 10:05 a.m., an interview was conducted with Resident 5. Resident 5 stated he could not recall if he had been given information about ADs and would like more information. A review of Resident 5's admission Facesheet indicated Resident 5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. A review of Resident 5's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-08-21 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — pattern
  Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the physician's orders for fluid restriction were followed for two of two residents (Residents 29 and 40) reviewed for nutrition and hydration.These failures had the potential to:1. cause further electrolyte (minerals that help with water balance in the body) imbalance for Resident 29, and2. exacerbate heart failure for Resident 40.Findings: 1.A review of Resident 29's admission Facesheet, indicated Resident 29 was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses which included acute kidney injury and hyponatremia (low salt levels in the body). A review of Resident 29's Minimum Data set (MDS - and assessment tool) dated July 23, 2025, indicated Resident 29 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS - designed to quickly evaluate a resident's cognitive function) use score of 15 (cognitively intact). A review of Resident 29's Orders indicated restrict fluids, 1200 ml (unit of measurement) per 24 hours with order date of July 23, 2025. A review of Resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-08-21 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe medication administration practices were implemented to meet the needs of the residents when: 1. One nurse was observed to not use the pill cutter to cut a medication tablet in half and instead, by hand to prepare and administer for one of four residents (Resident 10) 2. One nurse was observed to leave the resident's room before the resident finished one medication solution for one of four residents (Resident 42) 3. One blood pressure medication with hold parameters was administered not in accordance with the physician order and without clarification of the order for one of five residents reviewed (Resident 32) These failures had the potential for residents to receive inadequate medication therapy.1. On August 19, 2025, at 8:10 a.m., during a medication pass observation with RN 5, it was noted RN 5 prepared one of Resident 10's medication, citalopram (medication to treat mood disorder) 20 mg (milligram - unit of measurement)…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-21 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
  Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide food with appetizing taste according to residents' preferences for four of 23 sampled residents (Residents 10, 23, 40, and 41). This failure had the potential to decrease the nutritional intake and negatively affect the nutrition status of Residents 10, 23, 40 and 41. Findings: On August 18, 2025, the following interviews were conducted: - At 1:26 p.m., Resident 41 stated, chicken is like leather. - At 1:36 p.m., Resident 40 stated, chicken is dry and tough to chew. - At 1:40 p.m., Resident 10 stated, food not good, meat entrees taste dry and rubbery. - At 3:31 p.m., Resident 23 stated, food is hit miss, no taste, mushy texture. On August 20, 2025, at 12:15 p.m., during a concurrent observation and interview with the Registered Dietitian (RD), a test tray (to evaluate the quality of a meal during a meal service and identify any areas for improvement) of pork loin (pureed diet) and baked chicken (regular diet) was evaluated during meal service. The chicken was observed to be bland, dry and with gritty…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$14,043 in federal fines across 1 penalty. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

• $14,043 — penalty dated 2024-02-29
• Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-03-29 for 14 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 11 rows in the source record cover these 9 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

What families pay in CA