No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Saint Vincent Healthcare

1810 N. Fair Oaks Ave, Pasadena, CA 91103 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 78 certified beds · (626) 398-8182 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (626) 398-8182 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Resident-funds citation (F0568)Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

In its favor
  • a strong health-inspection score (4/5) — the hardest rating to game (though it’s ranked within its own state, not nationally)
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • lower-than-typical staff turnover (22% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0568)
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (50) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (1/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

3/5
CMS overall
3 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 4 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 1 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
1811 N Raymond Ave · (866) 663-3030 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
2061 N Los Robles Ave · (626) 900-8694 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
1458 Sunset Ave
Park
45 E Washington Blvd · (626) 744-7500 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 1 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 1 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 2 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating3★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased9.5%10.2%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight7.4%4.0%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.3%0.8%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection1.7%1.2%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms10.8%7.3%6.5%worse
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.4%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury2.3%1.6%3.3%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened2.9%9.8%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication13.3%13.7%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%98.2%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers2.1%4.3%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control1.5%10.2%21.2%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine97.4%93.2%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission18.6%23.0%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit3.3%11.2%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.072.251.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days0.071.571.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

45.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 74 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

45.8%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
9.9%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
45.0%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
not reportedno hours filed
Therapy hours / resident / day

Met the expected recovery: 45.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 80 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: not reported. This home filed no therapist hours at all in its payroll data for this quarter. That is a gap in what it reported, and we do not read it as an absence of therapy — the homes that file nothing here include ones that discharged hundreds of Medicare rehab patients in the very same period, who plainly received therapy from someone. Because we cannot tell a home that under-reports from one that genuinely provides little, this home is left out of the comparison above rather than scored at zero. Ask it directly how many therapist hours a rehab resident gets, and on which days.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF45.8%CMS range 29.1–60.351.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF9.9%CMS range 7.5–13.210.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge45.0%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge38.8%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge42.5%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified98.2%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge96.4%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.9%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization10.0%CMS range 6.5–16.47.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.311.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.42
RN hours/ resident / day
0.95
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.54
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.90
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.37
RN hoursweekends
22.4%
Total nursing turnover
44.4%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 78 beds and averages 72.8 residents a day — about 93% occupied, or roughly 5 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.90 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.42 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.54 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.59 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.03 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.44 to 0.37 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 22% is below the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

11
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-11-21)
16
at the previous standard inspection (2024-10-18)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

50 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 40 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-11-21 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and review, the facility failed to provide care in a manner that maintained a resident's dignity and respect for three of three sampled residents (Residents 3, 57, and 65) under dignity care area by failing to ensure facility staff were at eye level while assisting the residents during meals. This deficient practice had the potential to affect Resident 3, 57, and 65's self-esteem and self-worth.1. During a review of Resident 3's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 3 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included protein calorie malnutrition (a nutritional disorder caused by a deficiency of both protein [nutrient essential for building and repairing tissues like muscles and organs] and calories [unit of energy, and in nutrition measures the amount of energy the body gets from food and drinks] resulting in depletion of body fat and muscle mass, fatigue and increased susceptibility to illness, muscle…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-11-21 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide the necessary care and intervention to prevent accidents or injury for three (3) of five (5) sample residents (Resident 4 and 20) under the Accidents care area in accordance with the facility's policy and procedure when: 1. The facility did not ensure Residents 4 was not in the room while the housekeeping was mopping the floor on 11/18/2025.2. The facility did not ensure Resident 20 was not in the room while housekeeping was mopping the floor on 11/18/2025 and was reoriented and redirected back to her room while wandering (to move around different places usually without having a particular purpose or direction) on 11/20/2025 and 11/21/2025. These deficient practices placed Resident 4 and 20 at risk for accident and/ or injury. Findings: 1. During a review of Resident 4's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the resident was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-11-21 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility staff failed to provide privacy and confidentiality (safeguarding the content of information from unauthorized disclosure without the consent of the Resident and/or the individual's surrogate or representative) for one of 18 sampled residents (Resident 48) when Resident 48's name, room number, and post-op wound care instructions were left posted outside the residents room. This deficient practice violated Resident 48's right to privacy and confidentiality. Findings: During a review of Resident 48's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 48 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included unspecified atrial fibrillation (irregular heart rhythm where the upper chambers of the heart beat chaotically and out of sync with the lower chambers), unspecified glaucoma (increased eye pressure that lead to permanent vision loss and blindness) and unspecified macular degeneration (damage to the center of the eye). During a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-11-21 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, and record review, the facility failed to complete a Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR, a federal requirement to help ensure that every resident entering a Medicaid Certified Nursing Facility [NF] receives a Level I screening and if necessary a Level II Evaluation to ensure that the NF residence is appropriate and to identify what specialized services the resident may need) for one (1) of two (2) sampled residents (Resident 4) under PASRR care area, in accordance with the facility's policy. This deficient practice had the potential to result in inappropriate placement of Resident 4 and had the potential for not receiving the necessary and appropriate level of treatment and evaluation in the facility.Findings: During a review of Resident 4's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the resident was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included major depressive disorder (a mood disorder that causes a persistent…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-11-21 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one (1) of 1 sampled resident (Resident 4) received monitoring and care for the left eye redness as indicated on the care plan and in accordance with the facility's policy. This deficient practice had the potential to negatively affect Resident 4's physical comfort and well-being caused by delay in receiving necessary treatment. Findings: During a review of Resident 4's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the resident was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included cicatricial ectropion of left eye (a condition where the lower eyelid turns outward). During a review of Resident 4's Minimum Data Set (MDS- a resident assessment tool), dated 10/1/2025, the MDS indicated Resident 4 had severe impairment in cognitive (mental action or process of acquiring knowledge and understanding) skills for daily decision making. The MDS also indicated Resident 4 required…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-11-21 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide the necessary services to one of one sampled resident (Resident 5) who requires dialysis (the medical necessity for ongoing removal of waste and excess fluid from the blood to sustain life due to permanent kidney failure) by failing to accurately monitor the resident's fluid intake and to follow the physician's order for fluid restriction of 1000 milliliters (ml- unit of measurement for volume) a day. This deficient practice had the potential to place Resident 5 at risk for fluid overload recurrence.Findings: During a review of Resident 5's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included end stage renal disease (condition where the kidneys have permanently stopped working and can no longer function at a level needed to sustain life), acute respiratory failure with hypoxia (condition were the body cannot get enough oxygen in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-11-21 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of one of six sampled residents (Resident 47) in accordance with the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) by failing to:1. Administer ferrous sulfate (a supplement used to treat or prevent iron deficiency, a condition that can lead to tiredness) every other day as ordered. 2. Administer Vitamin C (a supplement that the body needs to form collagen for skin, blood vessels, and bones, to heal wounds, and to protect cells from damage) daily as ordered. These deficient practices had the potential for Resident 47 to experience tiredness, shortness of breath, bruise or bleed easily, and poor wound healing. Findings: During a review of Resident 47's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 47 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included anemia (condition where the blood does not carry enough oxygen to the rest of the body), moderate…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-21 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — isolated
    Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain a debris-free dumpster area when trash was not properly contained, uncovered, and overflowing for two of five trash bins.This failure had the potential to result in pests (an organism that causes harm to humans such as flies, cockroaches, and rodents) entering the facility and spreading diseases to the residents.Findings:During a concurrent observation and interview on 11/18/2025 at 8:19 AM with the Kitchen [NAME] (KC) in the outdoor garbage area, there were two dumpsters, one grey trash bin, one black trash bin, and three green trash bins. The black trash bin was not completely closed. The grey trash bin beside the black trash bin did not have a lid and was overflowing with garbage. There were folded brown boxes and trash bags filled with personal protective equipment (PPE, clothing and equipment that is worn or used to provide protection against hazardous substances and/or environments) on the ground next to the grey trash bin. KC stated trash should not be left on the ground. KC stated ants,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-21 · tag F0849 — isolated
    Arrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure there was documented evidence of the hospice service (a program designed to provide a caring environment for meeting the physical and emotional needs of the terminally ill) visits and coordination in the resident's medical record for one (1) of 1 sampled resident (Resident 10) from the Hospice care area in accordance with the facility's policy and procedure ) titled, Hospice Program. This deficient practice had the potential to result in a delay or lack of coordination in the delivery of hospice care and services to Resident 10. Findings: During a review of Resident 10's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD-a chronic lung disease causing difficulty in breathing) and dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities). During a review of Resident 10's Minimum Data Set (MDS- a resident assessment tool),…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-18 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow proper food handling practices in accordance with its policy and procedure by failing to: 1. Properly store frozen food items in the kitchen freezer. 2. Properly store and label dry pasta in sealed containers. 3. Ensure there were no expired foods in the kitchen. These deficient practices had the potential to result in food borne illness (any sickness that is caused by the consumption of foods or beverages that are contaminated with certain infectious or noninfectious agents) in a population of 67 residents consuming food by mouth. Findings: 1. During a concurrent observation in the facility kitchen with [NAME] 1 on 10/15/2024 at 8:02 AM, a box of sliced bacon and a box of frozen meat were observed in the freezer. Both boxes were observed opened, with the top box flaps folded and the contained meats were not in an airtight moisture resistant wrapper. During an interview on 10/16/2024 at 8:50 AM with Dietary Service Supervisor (DSS), DSS stated the kitchen staff do not remove frozen meats from the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 40 citations
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-18 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — pattern
    Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure two (2) of 2 garbage container (dumpster) lids remained closed and were not overflowing with trash in accordance with the facility's policy. This failure had the potential to result in the attraction and spread of vermin (animals that are believed to be harmful, or that carry diseases, e.g. rodent's parasitic worms or insects) that could potentially enter the facility and spread diseases to the residents. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 10/16/2024 at 8:32 AM, with Maintenance Supervisor (MS) and Maintenance Assistant (MA), in the facility's parking lot dumpster area, two dumpsters were observed with trash overflowing out of the sides and top of both dumpsters, with the dumpster lids opened due to overflowing trash. MA stated, The trash is overflowing, and the dumpster lids are not closed. Facility may need bigger trashcans. MS stated per facility policy, the dumpster lids should not be open and are to stay closed to make sure rodents, flies and insects [pests] do not go to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-18 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement enhanced barrier precautions (EBP - an infection control practice that involves wearing gloves and gowns during high-contact patient care activities to reduce the spread of multidrug-resistant organisms [MDROs- microorganisms that are resistant to multiple classes of antibiotics and antifungals]) for 11 of 11 sampled residents on EBP (Residents 27, 3, 7, 21, 23, 42, 69, 225, 28, 1, and 24) as indicated in the facility policy, by failing to ensure: 1. Licensed Vocational Nurse 3 (LVN 3) wore indicated personal protective equipment (PPE- protective clothing or equipment designed to protect the body from injury or infection) of a gown while administering medications through Resident 27's gastrostomy tube (GT - a tube that is surgically inserted into the resident's stomach to allow access for food, fluids, and medications) on 10/18/2024. Facility also failed to implement signage posted and PPE cart at the resident's door per policy.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-18 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the foley catheter (a flexible tube that drains urine from the bladder into a collection bag outside of the body) was covered with a dignity bag (a bag that covers and holds a foley catheter drainage bag to keep it out of sight) for one of 18 residents (Resident 225). This deficient practice had the potential to result in Resident 225 having decreased feelings of self-worth and/or self-esteem. Findings: During a review of Resident 225's admission Record, the admission record indicated resident 225 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Parkinson's disease (progressive neurological disease characterized by a fixed inexpressive face, tremor at rest, slowing of voluntary movements), muscle wasting (deterioration of muscle tissue) and atrophy (deterioration of a part of the body) and polyneuropathy (damage to multiple nerves outside of the brain and central nervous system). During a review of Resident 225's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-18 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to accommodate the needs of one (1) of three (3) sampled residents (Resident 63) by failing to provide a pad call light (a device for residents who have difficulty using a call light cord). This failure had the potential for Resident 63's needs to not be met, resulting in a lowered quality of care and quality of life. Findings: During a review of Resident 63's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 63 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included left hand contracture (a permanent tightening of the muscles, tendons, skin, and nearby tissues that causes the joints to shorten and become very stiff), pain in right shoulder, weakness (lack of strength), and major depressive disorder (MDD - a mental health disorder characterized by persistently depressed mood or loss of interest in activities, causing significant impairment in daily life). During a review of Resident 63's Minimum Data Set (MDS- a federally…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-18 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the care plan (a document that outlines the facility's plan to provide personalized care to a resident that includes measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs) interventions for one (1) of 18 residents (Resident 3), were applicable and resident-centered. This failure had the potential for Resident 3 to receive inappropriate and/or inadequate services which could harm the resident. Findings: During a review of Resident 3's admission Record, the admission record indicated Resident 3 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included chronic kidney disease (CKD - longstanding disease of the kidneys leading to renal failure), retention of urine (inability to completely empty the bladder), dementia (a condition characterized by progressive or persistent loss of intellectual functioning) and gross hematuria (a condition where blood is visibly present in the urine).…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-18 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensed nursing staff failed to meet professional standards of quality for assessing one (1) of five sampled residents (Resident 72) by failing to ensure Resident 72 was assessed and evaluated by Medical Doctor (MD) before adding a new diagnosis of schizophrenia (a mental disorder that affects the way a person thinks, acts, expresses emotions, perceives reality, and relates to others ) according to accepted standards of clinical practice. This deficient practice had the potential to result in provision of unnecessary care for Resident 72. Findings: During a review of Resident 72's admission Record, the admission record indicated Resident 72 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities), major depressive disorder (MDD- a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest), and Alzheimer's Disease (a brain disorder that slowly destroys memory and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-18 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolated
    Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one (1) of 18 sampled residents (Resident 2) with limitations in mobility was provided assistance while eating as indicated in the care plan and facility policy. This deficient practice had the potential for decline and not to maximize Resident 2's functional ability to perform activities of daily living (ADL), which can affect the resident's physical and mental wellbeing. This failure also had the potential not to meet Resident 2's nutritional needs which could lead to malnutrition (a condition that occurs when a person's body doesn't get the right amount of nutrients it needs to function properly) and hospitalization. Findings: During a review of Resident 2's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the resident was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included reduced mobility and Parkinson's disease (a progressive disease of the nervous system marked by rhythmic…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-18 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide the necessary treatment and services for one of one sampled residents (Resident 24) by failing to ensure Resident 24 received treatment for right heel (ankle) stage 3 (full-thickness loss of skin, dead and black tissue may be visible) pressure injury (localized, pressure-related damage to the skin and/or underlying tissue usually over a bony prominence) from 10/1/2024 to 10/7/2024 as indicated in Resident 24's wound treatment plan. This deficiency had the potential for Resident 24's right heel stage 3 pressure injury to worsen and had the potential to develop an infection. Findings: During a review of Resident 24's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 24 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM-a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound healing), unspecified protein-calorie malnutrition (inadequate intake of food that leads to changes…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-18 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the head of bed (HOB) was elevated at 30 degrees angle for one (1) of 1 sampled Resident (Resident 28) while receiving gastrostomy (a surgical opening fitted with a device to allow feedings to be administered directly to the stomach common for people with swallowing problems) tube (GT) feeding in accordance with the facility's policy. This failure has the potential for Resident 28 to aspirate (feeding could enter the windpipe and lungs) which could lead to lung problem such as pneumonia (an infection/inflammation of the lungs). Findings: During a review of Resident 28's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the resident was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included dysphagia (difficulty swallowing). During a review of Resident 28's Care Plan, initiated on 4/9/2024, the Care Plan indicated, to administer tube feeding as ordered and to always elevate the HOB during…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-18 · tag F0699 — isolated
    Provide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide trauma-informed care (an approach to delivering care that involves understanding, recognizing, and responding to the effects of all types of traumas) for one (1) of three (3) sampled residents (Resident 35) who was diagnosed with post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD-a disorder in which a person has difficulty recovering after experiencing or witnessing a terrifying event) in accordance with the facility's policy. This deficient practice had the potential for Resident 35 to experience re-traumatization, (unintentionally causing harm through practices, policies, and/or activities that are insensitive to the needs of the residents) that could lead to severe psychosocial harm and negatively affecting Resident 23's quality of life. Findings: During a review of Resident 35's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the resident was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included post…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-18 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolated
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Registry (a placement service that provides staff on a temporary or day-to day basis in a facility) Certified Nursing Assistant 1 (RCNA 1) had the competency (a measurable pattern of knowledge, skills, abilities, behaviors, and other characteristics that an individual needs to perform work roles or occupational functions successfully) in skill sets necessary before providing care to residents in the facility. RCNA 1 worked in the facility on 10/17/2024. This deficient practice had the potential for residents to not receive appropriate nursing services and had the potential to place residents at risk for injury or harm. Findings: During an interview with the Director of Staff Development (DSD), on 10/18/2024, at 12:30 PM, DSD stated the facility uses a registry when there is not enough staff to work in the facility. The DSD stated RCNA 1 was from a registry and worked during the 7AM to 3PM shift on 10/17/2024. The DSD stated she did not check and did not ask for a copy of RCNA 1's competency skills check and RCNA 1's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-18 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one (1) of five (5) sampled residents (Resident 68) was free from unnecessary use of psychotropic drug (any medication capable of affecting the mind, emotions, and behavior) in accordance with the facility policy and procedure by failing to have a clinical justification for the use of Risperdal (medication used to treat schizophrenia [a serious mental illness that affects a person's ability to think, feel, and behave], bipolar disorder [sometimes called manic-depressive disorder; mood swings that range from the lows of depression to elevated periods of emotional highs], and autism spectrum disorder [ASD - a complex developmental condition that affects how people interact, communicate, and behave]) without a clinical justification for use. This deficient practice had the potential to place Resident 68 at risk for significant adverse (harmful) consequences from the use of unnecessary psychotropic drug, which could result to impairment or decline…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-18 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to follow the resident personal food choices for one of eighteen (18) sampled residents (Resident 68) in accordance with the care plan and facility policy by failing to: 1. Follow Resident 68's food preference for Mexican food on 11/20/2023 and 5/10/2024. 2. Provide Resident 68 requested tacos on 1/25/2024, 1/30/2024 and 2/8/2024. 3. Provide Resident 68 requested beef soup on 1/26/2024. This deficient practice failed to accommodate Resident 68's food preference which had the potential to result in weight loss and affect the resident's psychological, physical, and emotional well-being. Findings: During a review of Resident 68's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the resident was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included major depressive disorder (a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest), metabolic encephalopathy (ME, occurs when…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-18 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to offer the pneumococcal vaccine (a medical injection that protects against the bacteria Streptococcus pneumoniae) for one of five sampled residents (Resident 2) upon readmission on [DATE] as indicated in the facility's policy. This failure placed Resident 2 at a higher risk of acquiring preventable infections such as pneumonia (PNA- an infection in your lungs), bacteremia (infection of the blood), or meningitis (infection of the tissue covering the brain and spinal cord) and increased the risk of transmission to other residents in the facility. Findings: During a review of Resident 2's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included ventricular tachycardia (a condition in which the lower chambers of the heart [ventricles] beat too fast), Parkinson's Disease (progressive neurological disease characterized by a fixed inexpressive face, tremor at rest, slowing of voluntary…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-11-02 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. A review of Resident 36's admission Record, indicated Resident 36 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of COPD, morbid obesity (abnormal or excessive fat accumulation), and diabetes mellitus type 2 (high blood sugar). A review of Resident 36's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS, a standardized assessment and care-screening tool), dated 10/9/2023, indicated the resident had an active diagnosis of COPD with acute exacerbation. A review of Resident 36's COPD care plan, dated 7/4/2023, indicated the care plan was not revised according to the re-evaluation date on the care plan. A review of Resident 36's care plan on 11/2/2023 at 10:03 AM, indicated Resident 36's quarterly COPD care plan's re-evaluation date listed as 10/2023. During a concurrent interview and record review on 11/2/2023 at 10:10 AM with Director of Nursing (DON), the DON stated the COPD care plan for Resident 36 was not and should have been revised during the quarterly interdisciplinary team (IDT) meeting in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-11-02 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — pattern
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure four (3) of five (5) Residents (Resident 3, 5, and 45) were hydrated as indicated on the facility policy. a. Resident 3 was not provided a water pitcher b. Resident 5 was not provided a water pitcher c. Resident 45 was not given 200 milliliters ([ml] unit of measurement) of water, as ordered, after administration of Glucerna (a nutritional supplement meal replacement designed for residents with diabetes [a condition whereby the body is not able to regulate blood levels of sugar]) via gastrostomy tube (G-tube, surgical procedure wherein a tube is inserted through the abdomen wall and into the stomach used for nutrition and medication administration) on 10/31/23. This deficient practice had the potential to place the residents at risk for dehydration (harmful reduction in the amount of water or fluids in the body). Findings: a. A review of Resident 3's admission Record indicated Resident 3 was initially admitted to the facility on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-11-02 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — pattern
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure they do not have a medication error rate of five percent (%) or greater as evidenced by the identification of eleven (11) medication errors (the observed or identified preparation or administration of medications or biologicals which is not in accordance with the prescriber's order; manufacturers specifications (not recommendations) regarding the preparation and administration of the medication or biological; accepted professional standards and principles which apply to professionals providing services) out of 25 opportunities (observed administered medications) for error and yielded a facility medication error rate of 44 percent for five out of 23 sampled residents (Residents 9, 16, 41, 45, and 48) observed during medication administration (med pass). Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN 1) failed to administer: 1. Metoprolol (a medication that lowers your blood pressure and heart rate) twice daily for Resident 9 as indicated in the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-11-02 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — pattern
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from significant medication errors by failing to administer 10 medications on 10/31/2023 according to the physician's order for five (5) of 11 residents observed for medication administration (Residents 9, 16, 41, 45, and 48). 1. Late administration of Metoprolol Tartrate (a medication used to treat high blood pressure) 50 milligrams (mg-a unit of measure for mass) for Resident 9. 2. Late administration of Metformin (a medication used to treat high blood sugar levels caused by type 2 diabetes) 850 mg for Resident 48. 3. Late administration of Carvedilol (a medication that slows down the heart rate making it easier for the heart to pump blood around the body) 25 mg and Metformin 1000 mg for Resident 16. 4. Late administration of Carvedilol 3.125 mg for Resident 41. 5. Late administration of Citalopram (a medication used to treat depression) 10 mg, Amlodipine (a medication used to treat high blood pressure) 10 mg,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-11-02 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store and dispose medication for one of one medication storage room in accordance with the facility's policy and procedure. There were four (4) medications observed stored in the medication storage room with past the expiration date. In addition, there were 4 bottles of medications/ supplements that were stored in the Director of Nursing's (DON) office. These deficient practices had the potential to cause inaccurate test results when expired blood sugar strips are used, medication error (the observed or identified preparation or administration of medications or biologicals which is not in accordance with the prescriber's order; manufacturers specifications [not recommendations] regarding the preparation and administration of the medication or biological; accepted professional standards and principles which apply to professionals providing services), and for residents to be exposed to adverse side effects ( unwanted undesirable effects that are possibly related to a drug) of using expired supplies such as…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-11-02 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow the diet menu instructions when serving lunch for two of four sampled residents. (Residents 45 and 61). This had the potential for the residents not to receive the required amount of nutrition as indicated on the therapeutic diet (a meal plan that controls the intake of certain foods or nutrients in the treatment or management of certain diseases, illnesses, or medical conditions) menu, which could lead to weight loss or gain. Findings: a. A review of Resident 45's admission Record indicated Resident 45 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE], with diagnoses of dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), Gastro-Esophageal Reflux Disease (GERD - a digestive disease in which stomach acid or contents irritates the food pipe lining), and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (a disorder in which the body does not produce enough or respond normally to insulin [a hormone released from the pancreas that controls the amount of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-02 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to label foods in the kitchen with item names, open date, and expiration date and discard expired food as indicated on the facility policy. These deficient practices had the potential to result in pathogen (germ) exposure to residents and placed residents at risk for developing foodborne illness (food poisoning) with symptoms including upset stomach, stomach cramps, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, and fever and can lead to other serious medical complications and hospitalization. Findings: During a concurrent observation in the kitchen and interview with [NAME] 1 on 10/30/2023 at 8:26 AM, [NAME] 1 stated all food items were supposed to be labeled with item name and dated with the open and used by date. In Freezer 1 were the following: a. Ham dated 10/22/2023. The date did not indicate if it was received on this date or needed to be used by this date. b. A piece of turkey was dated 9/7/2023. The date did not indicate if it was received on this date or needed to be used by this date. c. An unidentified meat dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-02 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to promote dignity and respect for one of 23 sampled residents (Resident 24). The facility staff was observed standing above Resident 24's eye level while assisting the resident during mealtime. This deficient practice had the potential to affect Resident 24's self-esteem and self-worth and violates Resident 24's right to be treated with dignity. Findings: A review of Resident 24's admission Record indicated Resident 24 was admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Parkinson's disease (a brain disorder that causes unintended or uncontrollable movements), type 2 diabetes mellitus (a chronic condition that affects the way the body processes blood sugar), and dementia (a brain disorder that results in memory loss, poor judgment, and confusion). A review of Resident 24's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a standardized assessment and care planning tool), dated 10/1/2023, indicated Resident 24 had moderately impaired cognition…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-02 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the call light device (a device used by a resident to signal his or her need for assistance) was within reach for one of 23 sampled residents (Resident 69) who had a history of cerebrovascular accident (CVA, stroke- loss of blood flow to a part of the brain) and left sided weakness. This deficient practice had the potential to negatively impact the psychosocial well-being of Resident 23 and result in delayed provision of care and services. Findings: A review of Resident 69's admission Record indicated Resident 69 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included occlusion and stenosis of right carotid artery (condition that happens when the large artery on either side of the neck becomes blocked), dementia (a brain disorder that results in memory loss, poor judgment, and confusion), and essential hypertension (high blood pressure). A review of Resident 69's Care Plan titled, Falls Care Plan, dated 9/15/2023, indicated Resident 69…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-02 · tag F0568 — isolated
    Properly hold, secure, and manage each resident's personal money which is deposited with the nursing home.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide quarterly statement of funds per policy and procedure for one of one sampled resident (Resident 3). This deficient practice had the potential to result in Resident 3 being worried about how much money was in his account and potential for misappropriation of funds. Findings: A review of Resident 3's admission Record indicated Resident 3 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE], with diagnoses major depressive disorder (a mental health disorder characterized by persistently depressed mood or loss of interest in activities, causing significant impairment in daily life), Parkinson's disease (progressive disease of the nervous system marked by tremor, muscular rigidity, and slow, imprecise movement), and contracture (a condition of shortening and hardening of muscles, tendons, or other tissue, often leading to deformity and rigidity of joints) of the right elbow and right hand. A review of Resident 3's Minimum Data…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-02 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents' medical records were updated to show documentation that advance directives (written statement of a person's wishes regarding medical treatment made to ensure those wishes are carried out should the person be unable to communicate them to a doctor) were discussed and written information were provided to the residents and/or resident representatives for two (2) of nine (9) sampled residents (Resident 23 and 30). This deficient practice violated the residents' and/or the representatives' right to be fully informed of the option to formulate their advance directives and had the potential to cause conflict with the residents' wishes regarding health care. Findings: 1. A review of Resident 23's admission Record indicated Resident 23 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE], with diagnoses of dementia (progressive brain disorder that slowly destroys memory and thinking skills), schizophrenia (a chronic and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-02 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify the State Long Term Care Ombudsman (public advocate) of the resident's transfer from the facility to the General Acute Care Hospital (GACH) for one (1) of 1 sampled resident (Resident 30). This deficient practice had the potential to result in the State Long Term Care Ombudsman not being aware of the resident's transfer and condition and inappropriate resident discharge or transfer. Findings: A review of Resident 30's admission Record indicated Resident 30 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE], with diagnoses of dementia (progressive brain disorder that slowly destroys memory and thinking skills), paranoid schizophrenia (characterized by predominately positive symptoms of schizophrenia including delusions and hallucinations), and bipolar disorder (mental disorder characterized by episodes of mania and depression). A review of Resident 30's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a standardized assessment and care planning…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-02 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop an individualized baseline care plan with 48 hours of admission to meet the immediate needs that included interventions for safety and preferences for one of 23 sampled residents (Resident 69) who had left-sided hemiplegia (paralysis of one side of the body). This deficient practice had the potential to negatively affect the well-being and the delivery of necessary care and services for Resident 69. Findings: A review of Resident 69's admission Record indicated Resident 69 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included occlusion and stenosis of the right carotid artery (condition that happens when the large artery on either side of the neck becomes blocked), dementia (a brain disorder that results in memory loss, poor judgment, and confusion), and essential hypertension (high blood pressure). A review of Resident 69's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a standardized assessment and care planning tool), dated 09/19/2023,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-02 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive and resident-centered care plan for two of 23 sampled residents (Residents 45 and 69) as indicated on the facility policy and procedure. 1. Resident 45's Care Plan did not indicate complete interventions to prevent falls. 2. Resident 69 did not have a care plan for left-sided hemiplegia (paralysis of one side of the body. These deficient practices had the potential for Resident 45 and Resident 69 to not be appropriately cared for by facility staff in providing resident-centered care and services. Findings: 1. A review of Resident 45's admission Record indicated Resident 45 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE], with diagnoses that included pneumonia (an infection that affects one or both lungs), unspecified dementia (a brain disorder that results in memory loss, poor judgment, and confusion), and schizophrenia (a mental disorder that affects the way a person thinks, acts,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-02 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a functioning television remote control for one of 23 sampled residents (Resident 64) to support her choice of activity based on the comprehensive assessment. This deficient practice resulted in Resident 64 not able to watch television from 10/27/2023 to10/30/2023, which is a part of her preferred activity and had the potential to affect Resident 64's sense of self-worth and psychosocial well-being and meaningfulness. Findings: A review of Resident 64's admission Record indicated Resident 64 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included schizoaffective disorder (a mental illness that can affect the thought, mood, and behavior), osteoarthritis (a disease in which the tissues in the joint breakdown over time), and muscle weakness. A review of Resident 64's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a standardized assessment and care planning tool), dated 02/15/2023, indicated Resident 64 had moderately impaired cognition (thought process and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-02 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement treatment for the prevention of pressure ulcer/injury (painful wound caused as a result of pressure or friction) by failing to ensure that the low air loss mattress (LAL, mattress used for residents who are at risk for developing sores or already have pressure sores designed to circulate a constant flow of air for the management of pressure sores) was on the correct settings for one of one sampled resident (Resident 3) in accordance with the facility's policy. This deficient practice had the potential to place the Resident 3 at risk for skin integrity complications and pressure injury. Findings: A review of Resident 3's admission Record indicated Resident 3 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE], with diagnoses of open wound of scrotum (the external sac of skin that encloses the testes [male reproductive gland that produces sperm]) and testes, Parkinson's disease (progressive disease of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-02 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain a safe environment for one (1) of six (6) sampled residents (Resident 57), a fall risk resident, when Resident 57's bed was observed not in the lowest position. Resident 57 did not have a fall risk signage inside the room per facility policies and procedures. This deficient practice had the potential for Resident 57 to sustain an injury in an event of a fall. Findings: A review of Resident 57's admission Record indicated, the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of muscle weakness, dementia (a loss of thinking, remembering, and reasoning skills), and schizophrenia (a mental disorder involving a disconnection from reality). A review of Resident 57's Fall Risk Assessment, dated 10/8/2023, indicated a score of 14. A total score above 10 on the Fall Risk Assessment indicated high risk for falls. A review of Resident 57's Falls Care Plan, dated 10/8/2023, indicated Resident 57 was at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-02 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident with a gastrostomy tube (GT, a tube that is passed through the abdominal wall to the stomach used to provide nutrition) received tube feeding as indicated on the physician's order for one (1) of five (5) sampled residents (Resident 23). This deficient practice had the potential to result in Resident 23 to not receive the volume of tube feeding formula ordered, which can lead to weight loss, malnutrition (lack of sufficient nutrients in the body), and death. Findings: A review of Resident 23's admission Record indicated Resident 23 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE], with diagnoses of failure to thrive (state of decline that may include weight loss, decreased appetite, poor nutrition, and inactivity), dementia (progressive brain disorder that slowly destroys memory and thinking skills), schizophrenia (a chronic and severe mental disorder that affects how a person thinks, feels, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-02 · tag F0849 — isolated
    Arrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a coordination of care between facility and hospice (care designed to give supportive care to people in the final phase of a terminal illness and focus on comfort and quality of life, rather than cure) staff for one of one sampled resident (Resident 54) in accordance with the facility's hospice policy and hospice agreement by failing to ensure: a. a hospice comprehensive assessment to include a documented evidence of hospice staff notes visits on 10/25/2023, and 10/28/2023. b. hospice care plan was revised This deficient practice had the potential for Resident 54 not to receive the hospice care and services necessary to promote comfort and quality of life. Findings: A review of Resident 54's admission Record indicated Resident 54 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident 54's diagnoses included diabetes mellitus (high blood sugar), dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), and senile degeneration of bran (mental decline). A review of Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-02 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain infection control measures for three (3) of three (3) sampled residents (Residents 16, 41 and 45), when: 1. Cleaning of the manual blood pressure monitor (an instrument for measuring blood pressure), was not done prior to use for Resident 16. 2. Cleaning of the blood pressure cuff (attached to the manual blood pressure monitor) was not done between each use for Residents 41 and 45. 3. Purified water was not used to flush the gastrostomy tube (g-tube, a tube inserted through the belly that brings nutrition directly to the stomach), per policy, for Resident 45. These deficient practices had the potential to spread infection through pathogens (organisms or agents that can produce disease) to Residents 16, 41, and 45 by using an unclean blood pressure cuff, and using unfiltered water in Resident 45's g-tube. Findings: 1. A review of Resident 16's admission Record indicated, Resident 16 was admitted to the facility 4/7/2023 and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Bcited before2025-11-21 · tag F0911 — pattern
    Ensure resident rooms hold no more than 4 residents; for new construction after November 28, 2016, rooms hold no more than 2 residents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure two (2) of 27 rooms (rooms [ROOM NUMBERS]) accommodated no more than four (4) residents in each room. rooms [ROOM NUMBERS] have five (5) beds. This deficient practice has the potential for the residents' care and services not to be adequately accommodated, have an adverse effect on the residents' safety, and place residents at risk for lack of privacy.During the initial tour of the facility on 11/18/2025 from 9 AM to 9:15 AM, there were two rooms (13 and 14) observed with five beds in a room. The residents in rooms [ROOM NUMBERS] did not complain regarding the space in their room. There was enough space for the staff to provide care and enough storage for residents' belongings. One resident who was ambulatory and three (3) residents in room [ROOM NUMBER] who were wheelchair bound were able to move in the room without difficulty. Five (5) residents in room [ROOM NUMBER] who were wheelchair bound were able to move in the room without…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Bcited before2025-11-21 · tag F0912 — pattern
    Provide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide the minimum of 80 square feet (sq.ft. - unit of measurement) per resident bed in 25 of 27 resident rooms in the facility. This deficient practice had the potential to impact the ability to provide safe nursing care and privacy to the residents.During an observation of the residents' rooms one (1) to nine (9) and 11 to 26 on 10/18/2025 from 9 AM to 3:48 PM, 25 of 27 resident rooms did not meet the minimum 80 sq ft per resident in each room. The residents did not complain regarding the space in their room. There was enough space for the staff to provide care and enough storage for residents' belongings. All the Residents including the ones who were ambulatory and wheelchair bound were able to move in and out of the room without difficulty. During a concurrent observation in Resident 39's room (room [ROOM NUMBER]) and interview on 11/20/2025 at 1 PM, Resident 39 was observed resting in bed then walking to her closet then back to bed.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Bcited before2024-10-18 · tag F0912 — pattern
    Provide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide the minimum of 80 square feet (sq.ft.) per resident bed in 25 of 27 residents' rooms in the facility. This deficient practice had the potential to impact the ability to provide safe nursing care and privacy to the residents. Findings: During an observation of the resident's rooms one (1) to nine (9) and 11 to 26 on 10/15/2024, at 8:36AM, 25 of 27 resident's rooms did not meet the minimum 80 sq. ft. per resident in each room. The residents did not complaint regarding the space in their room. There was enough space for the staff to provide care and enough storage for residents' belongings. Residents that were wheelchair bound were able to move in and out of the room without difficulty. During a concurrent observation and interview with Resident 45 on 10/18/2024, at 12:07 PM, Resident 45 was observed coming out of the bathroom on her wheelchair. Resident 45 propelled herself to the left side of bed, where the TV and bedside table were located. Resident 45 stated her room was fine, and she has no…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · B2023-11-02 · tag F0577 — pattern
    Allow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the recent (last survey was 11/04/2022) survey reports (outcome of the survey that were conducted to protect residents and to ensure that all residents receive the quality of care) are accessible for all the residents. This deficient practice had the potential for the residents and their legal representatives to not be fully informed of the facility's deficient practices and how they were corrected. Findings: During an observation on 10/30/2023 at 10 AM in nurse station 1, there was a wall holder signage of consumer information, survey result with a white binder which is chained to the wall. There were other papers hanging on the wall holder that blocks the binder. The binder cannot be easily removed from the chain. During a concurrent observation in nursing station 1 and interview with the Registered Nurse 1 (RN 1) on 11/1/2023 at 4 PM, RN 2 stated that there were no other postings indicating a notice of the availability of the survey in the facility except on the survey binder that was chained on the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Bcited before2023-11-02 · tag F0911 — pattern
    Ensure resident rooms hold no more than 4 residents; for new construction after November 28, 2016, rooms hold no more than 2 residents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and record review, the facility failed to ensure two (2) of 27 rooms (13 and 14) accommodated no more than four residents in each room. rooms [ROOM NUMBERS] have five residents and five beds. This deficient practice has the potential for the resident's care and services to not be adequately accommodated, have an adverse effect on the residents' safety, affect provision of care and services, and place residents at risk for lack of privacy. Findings: During the initial tour observation of the facility on 10/10/2023 from 10:45 AM until 12:00 PM, observed rooms [ROOM NUMBERS] with five beds in a room. In rooms [ROOM NUMBERS], all five beds were observed to be occupied. A review of the room waiver, dated 10/30/2023, indicated the following: Room #Beds Sq.ft. Sq.ft. per Bed 13 5 357.19 71.44 14 5 356.25 72.25 A review of the facility's room waiver letter, dated 10/30/23, indicated a request for the continued waiver for rooms [ROOM NUMBERS] that have five beds in a room. It also indicated the rooms…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Bcited before2023-11-02 · tag F0912 — pattern
    Provide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide the minimum of 80 square feet (sq.ft.) per resident bed in 25 of 27 residents' rooms in the facility. This deficient practice had the potential to impact the ability to provide safe nursing care and privacy to the residents. Findings: During the initial observation of the facility on 10/30/2023 at 8:40 AM, in resident rooms 1 to 9 and 11 to 26, the minimum 80 sq. ft. per resident in each room was not met. The residents did not complaint regarding the space in their room. There was enough space for the staff to provide care and enough storage for residents' belongings. Residents that are wheelchair bound were able to move in and out of the room without difficulty. A review of the room waiver indicated the following: Room # Beds Sq. Ft. Sq. Ft. per Bed 1 3 213.75 71.25 2 2 145.55 72.78 3 3 213.09 71.03 4 2 146.11 73.06 5 3 213.09 71.03 6 3 213.89 71.30 7 3 213.89 71.30 8 3 213.10 71.03 9 3 213.10 71.03 10* 2 189.92 94.96 11 3 213.10…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
BARRETT, ROBERTIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF50%since 05/01/2010
BAUTISTA, CIPRIANOIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF50%since 05/01/2010
BRIONES, REGGIEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 11/16/2023
CASTRO, LILIBETHIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/01/2024
HOSSAIN, SYEDIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2016
MELLIBOSKY, CHRISTIANIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/01/2010
MIRANDA, JARELYIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/24/2012
NAVARRO, RHINAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2022
NUEVO, LESLIEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/01/2010
OVENSON, JOWELLIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/24/2025
SALVADOR, CECILIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/01/2010

CMS files one row per role, so the 26 rows in the source record cover these 11 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$10.5M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+7.2%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$216K
Related-party expense2% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 77%Medicare 20%Other / private 3%

About 77% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $216K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$368per resident / day
operating cost
$11,201per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$397per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in California
$12,167/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$15,178/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,000/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 555119. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-11-21, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next