No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

River Walk Care Center

1100 West Morton Avenue, Porterville, CA 93257 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 99 certified beds · (559) 782-1509 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (559) 782-1509 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Oct 2022Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)3 actual-harm citations$164,778 in federal fines1 Medicare payment denial
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Oct 2022
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has 3 actual-harm citations
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (50) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $164,778 in federal fines (most recent 2025-08-21)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
240 N Porter Rd · (559) 793-2677 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
1155 W Henderson Ave · (559) 784-3317 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
600 N Prospect St · (559) 781-1100 · Call to confirm hours
Park
900 W Grand Ave · (559) 784-1500 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
830 W Belleview Ave · (559) 783-1815

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 3 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 3 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased11.6%10.2%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight1.7%4.0%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.3%0.8%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%1.2%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms4.4%7.3%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.4%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury2.2%1.6%3.3%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened18.8%9.8%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication20.9%13.7%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%98.2%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers0.7%4.3%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control19.3%10.2%21.2%typical
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table1.9%12.0%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.0%1.5%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine98.8%93.2%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission29.4%23.0%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit18.7%11.2%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.492.251.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days3.781.571.80worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

49.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 79 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

49.9%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
12.3%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
56.6%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.54U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.28hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.22hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.04hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 56.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 53 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.54 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 84% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 12% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF49.9%CMS range 37.6–59.051.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF12.3%CMS range 7.7–16.910.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge56.6%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge52.8%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge56.6%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified96.7%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting97.5%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge88.1%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.8%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization9.4%CMS range 5.7–16.37.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.411.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.50
RN hours/ resident / day
0.95
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.69
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.14
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.26
RN hoursweekends
47.8%
Total nursing turnover
44.4%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 99 beds and averages 88.7 residents a day — about 90% occupied, or roughly 10 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.14 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.50 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.69 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.73 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.30 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.60 to 0.26 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 48% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

7
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-02-26)
8
at the previous standard inspection (2024-10-17)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

50 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 37 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · Gcited before2025-09-05 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement the care plan (specific healthcare goals, interventions, and monitoring strategies) for one of two sampled residents (Resident 1) when the bowel and bladder retraining (scheduled toileting) was not implemented for Resident 1 who was at high risk for falls and had a history of falls related to toileting needs. This failure resulted in Resident 1 going to the bathroom on 8/20/25, independently, falling and sustaining an acute (new) left femoral neck fracture (break in the bone that connects the head of the femur (ball of the hip joint) to the shaft of the femur) extending to the lesser trochanter (attachment point for hip flexor muscles) and requiring hospitalization and surgical repair.Findings:During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (AR) undated, the AR indicated Resident 1 was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including difficulty in walking and muscle weakness.During a review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS-resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · G2025-03-13 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) was provided: 1. A restorative nursing program (program where restorative nursing assistants [RNA]-assist residents with performing exercises to maintain their ability to perform daily activities and tasks, impacting their quality of life and overall well-being and independence) from February 2024-December 2024. 2. Physical therapy (PT-exercises, massages and various treatments used to relieve pain, help you move better or strengthen weakened muscles) and Occupational therapy (OT-focuses on everyday tasks and activities that people value and need to do, such as self-care, work, play, and social participation) as ordered by the physician in August 2024 and December 2024. These failures resulted in a decline in Resident 1's bed mobility (ability to move around in bed, including scooting, rolling, and moving from lying to sitting and back) which can lead to a decline in Resident 1's ability to participate…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-10-17 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow its policy and procedure on Care Plans, Comprehensive Person-Centered for one of three sampled residents (Resident 341) to reduce the risk of falls and minimize injuries. This failure resulted in Resident 341 falling multiple times in six months and sustaining a fracture (broken bone) to his left hip and left shoulder requiring surgical repair. Findings: During a review of Resident 341 admission Record (AR) dated 4/2/24, the AR indicated, Resident 341 was admitted on [DATE]. Resident 341 diagnosis including metabolic encephalopathy (brain dysfunction caused by a chemical im-balance in the blood that affects the brain) difficulty in walking, and muscle weakness (generalized). During a review of Resident 341 Minimum Data Set (MDS- a resident assessment tool) dated 04/2/24, the MDS indicated, Resident 341 had significant cognitive impairment (problem with a person's ability to think, learn, remember, use judgement, and make decisions) with a Brief…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-05 · tag F0628 — isolated
    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure their policy and procedure was followed when one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) did not have a discharge care plan developed. This failure had the potential for Resident 1 to have unmet discharge needs.Findings:During a review of Resident 1's IDT (Interdisciplinary Team-collaborative group of professionals from different disciplines who work together interdependently to provide comprehensive patient-centered care) Care Conference Meeting (IDTCCM), dated 2/27/26 at 2:15 p.m., the IDTCCM indicated, An IDT meeting was held to discuss the resident's progress.At this time, therapy recommends that the resident is not appropriate for discharge due to decreased activity tolerance and the need for continued strengthening and endurance training to ensure a safe transition home.The care plan will be updated accordingly to reflect ongoing therapy services, transfer training, and continued discharge planning.During a review of Resident 1's Progress Notes (PN) dated 3/19/26 at 2:18 p.m., the PN indicated, At 1230,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-02 · tag F0573 — isolated
    Let each resident or the resident's legal representative access or purchase copies of all the resident's records.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based interview and record review, the facility failed to follow its own policy and procedure (P&P) for one of three sampled (Resident 1) when written request for Resident 1's clinical records was not provided in a timely manner. This failure resulted in violation of Resident 1's rights and not providing Resident 1's clinical records approximately 29 days after the request date.Findings:During a concurrent interview and record review on 4/2/26 at 12:57 p.m. with Assistant Director of Nurses (ADON) and Medical Records Director (MRD), MRD stated on 2/26/26 a written request for Resident 1's clinical record was received. MRD stated Resident 1's clinical record was not released until 3/27/26 (approximately 29 days after the request date). ADON and MRD reviewed the facility's P&P titled, Release of Medical Records. ADON and MRD confirmed the facility P&P was not followed when written request for Resident 1's clinical record was not released within 2 working days.During a review of facility's P&P titled, Release of Medical Records, dated 2025, the P&P indicated, Access Rights to Medical…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-26 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — pattern
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to: 1. Ensure one of 25 sampled residents' (Resident 92) medical record contained accurate documentation. This failure resulted in inaccurate medical documentation and had the potential to result in inaccurate monitoring of wound progression, inappropriate treatment, and wound treatment complications. 2. Ensure one of 6 sampled residents (Resident 92) had a physician order prior to changing a wound treatment. This failure had the potential to result in inappropriate treatment and wound treatment complications.3. Ensure one of 4 sampled residents (Resident 10) had a physician order to discontinue weekly/monthly weights. This failure had the potential for Resident 10's weight gain or loss to go unmonitored.Findings:1.During a concurrent observation and interview on 2/23/26 at 10:06 a.m. with Resident 92, in Resident 92's room, Resident 92 was sitting in his wheelchair, and both of his lower legs were wrapped with Kerlix gauze (cotton medical dressing/wrap that was designed to absorb moderate to heavy wound…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-26 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement their care plan (a comprehensive, personalized document created by an interdisciplinary team [IDT - a collaborative group of healthcare professionals, including nurses, doctors, therapists, social workers, and the resident/family, who work together to create and implement personalized care plans] to guide a resident's medical, nursing, and rehabilitative care) intervention for monitoring five of 13 sampled residents (Resident 27, Resident 67, Resident 36, Resident 42, and Resident 3). This failure had the potential to result in resident harm/injury, and/or failure to provide appropriate interventions for Resident 27, Resident 67, Resident 36, Resident 42, and Resident 3 safety.Findings:During a review of Resident 27's Care Plan Report (CP), dated 11/13/23, the CP indicated, Resident 27 was at risk for unavoidable falls with major injury. On 11/3/25, an intervention was implemented for one-to-one monitoring (dedicated 24-hour staff for the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-02-26 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of 29 sampled residents (Resident 5) was provided with meal at a palatable (pleasant to taste) and safe temperature. This failure had the potential for food borne illnesses to affect all residents eating from the facility kitchen and/or result in meals not being palatable leading to potential unintended weight loss.Findings:During a concurrent observation and interview on 2/25/26 at 12:55 p.m. with Dietary Supervisor (DS), the last lunch meal tray was served, and food temperatures were taken. DS observed and confirmed the following food temperatures: Fish temperature was at 116 degrees Fahrenheit ( F- a unit of measurement). DS stated the temperature was supposed to be at 140 FBroccoli temperature was at 113 F. DS stated the temperature was supposed to be at 140 FRice temperature was at 128 F. DS stated the temperature was supposed to be at 140 FCucumber salad was at 70 F. DS stated the temperature was supposed to be below 68 FMilk was at 52 F. DS stated the milk was supposed to be 40 F or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-26 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to monitor refrigerator/freezer temperatures used to store residents' food. This failure had the potential to spread foodborne illnesses to residents.Findings:During a concurrent interview and record review on 2/23/25 at 9:26 a.m. with Dietary Supervisor (DS), the facility document titled, Refrigerator and Freezer Temperature Log (RFTL), was reviewed. The RFTL indicated, the refrigerator/freezer temperatures where to be taken in the a.m. and the p.m. The RFTL indicated, the following: On 12/31/25 - there was no temperature taken in the a.m.On 11/29/25 - there was no temperature taken in the in the p.m.On 10/31/25 - there was no temperature taken in the a.m. DS stated the temperatures should have been taken but were not. During a review of the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled, COLD STORAGE TEMPERATURE MONITORING AND RECORD KEEPING, undated, the P&P indicated, Food and Nutrition staff shall review and record temperature of all refrigerators and freezers to ensure they are at the correct temperature for food storage…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-26 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow standard practice for infection control when: 1. Two of eight sampled staff members (Certified Nursing Assistant [CNA] 1 and Physical Therapy Assistant [PTA] 1) did not apply appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE- gowns, gloves, face masks, face shields or other equipment designed to protect the wearer from injury or the spread of infection or illness) prior to providing high contact care (involving direct contact with a resident) to a resident on enhanced barrier precautions (EBP- an infection control practice that utilizes the use of gown and gloves during high contact care activities to stop the spread of multi-drug resistant organisms [MDRO]).2. Facility failed to implement their policy and procedure on Handling Soiled Linen, for one of 29 sampled residents (Resident 65). These failures had the potential to spread infection and cause illness to residents, staff, and visitors. Findings: 1. During a concurrent observation and interview on 2/24/26 at 8:42 a.m. with CNA 1 and PTA 1 in Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-26 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
    Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow its policy and procedure (P&P) titled Psychotropic Medication [medication that affects brain activity, resulting in changes in mood, behavior, thoughts, and perception] Use for one of two sampled residents (Resident 45) when psychotropic medication was administered to Resident 45 for 50 days without IDT (Interdisciplinary team- a collaborative group of healthcare professionals, including nurses, doctors, therapists, social workers, and the resident/family, who work together to create and implement personalized care plans) approval and consent. This failure had the potential for Resident 45 receiving a larger dose of medication than what the facility determined was appropriate causing potential for harm and/or serious side effects. Findings:During a review of Resident 45's admission RECORD (AR), dated 2/26/26, the AR indicated Resident 45 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis of muscle weakness, history of falling, unspecified…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-26 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to follow the steps in checking the placement of G-Tube (surgical tube place in stomach delivering nutrient supplement) prior to administering two medications for one of four sampled Residents (Resident 79). This failure the had potential for Resident 79 to have discomfort and aspiration (food or liquid enters the airway).Findings:During a review of Resident 79's Order Summary (OS), dated 1/1/25, the OS indicated, Every shift check tube placement. By gastric [stomach] aspiration of contents. Report residuals > [greater than] 100 cc [cubic centimeters-unit of measurement].During a review of Resident 79's OS, dated 1/1/25, the OS indicated, Every shift for Diet Flush with 15 cc [cubic centimeter/milliliter] of water before and after each medication.During a concurrent observation and interview on 2/25/26 at 12:35 p.m. with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 2 in Resident 79's room, LVN 2 did not check stomach residual prior to administering Resident 79's two crushed medications. LVN 2 did not give 15 ml (millimeters-…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-09 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to re-assess and monitor one of three sampled resident (Resident 1) with bruising to the right forearm. This failure had the potential Resident 1's bruise to the right forearm to worsen.Findings:During a review of the clinical record for Resident 1, the admission note dated 1/15/26 indicated Resident 1 was admitted with discoloration (bruising) to bilateral (both) forearms. The skin re-assessment note dated 1/16/26 indicated, resident (Resident 1) presenting with bruising to RFA (right forearm) measuring approximately 6cm (centimeters) x5cm. Treatment Record (TR) for the month of 1/26 indicated Resident 1's bruise to right forearm was not re-assessed after monitoring order was completed on 1/23/26. During a concurrent interview and record review on 2/9/26 at 11:24 a.m. with Treatment Nurse (TN), Resident 1's clinical records were reviewed. TN confirmed Resident 1 was admitted on [DATE] with bruise to right forearm. TN stated it was the facility practice…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 37 citations
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-10-27 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure:1. Expired food was disposed of;2. Food was labeled and dated in the refrigerator and freezer once opened;3. Frozen food items were stored properly and;4. Steam table was kept free of debris.These failures had the potential for residents to consume expired food items and the potential for food borne illness.Findings:During a concurrent observation and interview on 10/27/25 at 9:07 a.m. with Dietary Supervisor (DS), in the dry food storage room, there was a package of 12 hamburger buns on the shelf labeled with the date 10/15/25 (12 days earlier). DS stated the hamburger buns should have been used within five to seven days from the date on the label. During a concurrent observation and interview on 10/27/25 at 9:10 a.m. with DS, in the walk-in refrigerator, there were nine bowls of apple crisp, 11 containers of vanilla pudding, 13 plastic containers of mixed fruit and 11 containers of chocolate pudding on trays that contained no label. There was a plastic food storage container that was labeled lunch…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-21 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify the physician when one of two sampled residents (Resident 1) had blue discoloration to his left foot. This failure resulted in the facility being unaware of Resident 1's nondisplaced (bone fragments are in their original position) fracture (break in the bone) proximal (closer to the center) aspect proximal phalanx (toe bone) left first digit and a delay in care.Findings:During a review of the Progress Notes (PN) dated 8/11/25 at 10:26 p.m. (documented by Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 3), the PN indicated, Resident is being monitored for s/s (signs and symptoms) of edema (swelling that occurs when fluid builds up in the body's tissues) to BLEs (bilateral lower extremities), will encourage resident to elevate legs. Denies pain and discomfort at this time. Resident has bluish discoloration noted on left foot.During a review of the PN dated 8/12/25 at 12:03 p.m. (documented by LVN 2), the PN indicated, Resident has bluish discoloration noted on left foot.During a review of the PN dated 8/12/25 at 8:26 p.m. (documented…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-29 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow Physicians Order (PO) for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) when a follow up wound clinic appointment was not scheduled. This failure had the potential for Resident 1's wound to worsen. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's Discharge Activity Instructions ([NAME]), dated 4/29/25, the [NAME] indicted, Follow up at [clinic name] Wound Healing Clinic to resume grafix (skin graft) and wound vac (machine used for wound healing) therapy. During an interview on 5/28/25 at 1:30 p.m. with Wound Nurse (WN), WN stated Resident 1 was admitted on [DATE] from the hospital with multiple wounds including unstageable (depth and stage cannot be determined) to right buttocks and stage 3 (full-thickness loss of skin. Dead and black tissue may be visible) to left buttock and sacrum. WN stated she was not aware of Resident 1 having a follow up order at the wound clinic. During a concurrent interview and record review on 5/28/25 at 1:39 p.m. with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-30 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow its policy and procedure for a change of condition for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) when a S (Situation) B (Background) A (Appearance) R (Review and Notify) (SBAR-document used to notify the physician of a change of condition) was not completed, and Resident 1 was not monitored for a change of condition when experiencing a dislocated hip. This failure had the potential for staff to be unaware of Resident 1's worsening condition and the potential for a delay in care. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's Progress Notes (PN) dated 1/27/25 at 1:58 p.m., the PN indicated, Xray results received. The prosthetic (artificial body part) head is dislocated (joint that is no longer in proper alignment) superior (above another structure) to the acetabular cup (a prosthetic implant used in total hip replacement surgery to replace the natural acetabulum). No evidence of acute fracture or dislocation. [Physician name] made aware. New orders: Refer to [Physician name] . During a review of Resident 1's PN dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-30 · tag F0622 — isolated
    Not transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) was provided with a detailed discharge summary. This failure had the potential for Resident 1 to be unaware of how to care for his wounds and the potential for the wounds to worsen. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's Order Summary Report (OSR-physicians orders) dated 12/1/24, the OSR indicated, L (left) back of heel diabetic ulcer (open sores or wounds on the feet of people with diabetes [high blood sugar]) 1.3 cm (centimeters-a unit of measurement) x 1.1 cm cleanse with wound cleaner, pay [sic] dry and swab with betadine.start date 8/21/24.unstageable pressure injury (pressure ulcer [injury to skin and underlying tissue resulting from prolonged pressure on the skin] where the depth and extent of the tissue damage cannot be determined) to L inner heel cleanse with wound cleaner and swab with betadine.start date 11/19/24.unstageable pressure injury to L medial foot cleanse with wound cleanser and swab with betadine.start date 11/19/24. During a review of Resident 1's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-30 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure physician's orders were followed for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) when: 1. The physician was not notified when blood sugar results were greater than 400; 2. Antibiotics were not administered for osteomyelitis (bone infection). These failures had the potential for Resident 1 to experience adverse side effects such as delayed wound healing and the potential for wounds to worsen. Findings: 1. During a review of Resident 1's Order Summary Report (OSR-physician orders) dated 1/1/25, the OSR indicated, Humulin R (medication used to control high blood sugar).inject as per sliding scale: if 70-200 = 0 (units); 201-250 = 2; 251-300 = 4; 301-350 = 6; 351-400 = 8, subcutaneously (under the skin) three times a day for diabetes mellitus (chronic metabolic disorder characterized by high blood sugar levels, due to a deficiency in insulin production or the body's inability to effectively use insulin) hold if BS (blood sugar) < (less than) 70 or > (greater than) 400. Notify MD. During a review of Resident 1's OSR…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-30 · tag F0808 — failed to follow doctor-ordered diets — isolated
    Ensure therapeutic diets are prescribed by the attending physician and may be delegated to a registered or licensed dietitian, to the extent allowed by State law.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the therapeutic menu was followed for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1). This failure resulted in Resident 1 being served the incorrect dessert. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's Order Summary Report (OSR-physician orders) dated 4/1/25, the OSR indicated, CCHO (consistent carbohydrate diet for diabetes [condition where the body either doesn't produce enough insulin or can't effectively use the insulin it does produce, leading to high blood sugar levels])/NAS (no added salt) diet. During a review of the Cooks Spreadsheet (CS) dated 4/22/25, the CS indicated, the CCHO diet was to be served vanilla mousse no chocolate chips. During a concurrent observation and interview on 4/22/25 at 12:30 p.m. with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 1, in Resident 1's room, Resident 1's lunch tray was sitting on the over bed table. The lunch tray contained vanilla mousse pudding with chocolate chips. CNA 1 stated Resident 1 was provided pudding with chocolate chips. During an interview on 4/30/25 at 3:16…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-13 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure physician orders were followed for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) when treatments were not done as ordered. This failure had the potential for Resident 1's wounds to worsen. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's Treatment Administration Record (TAR) dated 9/2024, the TAR indicated, Cleanse right side of abdomen with wound cleanser pat dry and leave open to air one time a day for abrasion start date 9/13/24.cleanse with Dakin's (antiseptic solution), pat dry, apply dakins soaked gauze and cover with abd (abdominal) pad, and enforce with tape one time a day for abd post surgical old scar tissue open area start date 9/10/24.L (left) heel diabetic blister cleanse with wound cleanser, pat dry and swab with betadine.one time a day start date 9/13/24.R (right) heel diabetic blister.cleanse with wound cleanser, pat dry and swab with betadine one time a day start date 9/13/24.sacrum shearing.cleanse with wound cleanser pat dry and apply calmoseptine (medication) one time a day for shearing start date…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-12 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure professional standard of care for one of two sampled residents (Resident 1) when blood glucose (sugar) test (measures the sugar level in the blood) was not checked timely as ordered by the physician. This failure had the potential for Resident 1 to have adverse health outcomes. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 3/12/25 at 11:05 a.m. with Resident 1, Resident 1 was in her room, sitting in a wheelchair. Resident 1 stated her blood sugar was checked four times a day, before each meal and at bedtime. Resident 1 stated Registered Nurse (RN) does not check her blood sugar before dinner. Resident 1 stated, [RN] checks it [blood sugar level] either while I'm already eating or after I'm done eating and by that time it [sugar level] is high and he gives me more insulin (lowers blood sugar level). During a review of Resident 1's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS - a standardized, comprehensive assessment tool) dated 12/30/24, indicated, Resident 1 had a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-12 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolated
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure medication administration competency assessment was completed for one of two licensed nurses (Registered Nurse-RN). This failure had the potential for medication errors and unmet care needs. Findings: During a review of RN's employee file, RN was hired on 12/30/24. There was no medication administration competency assessment noted in RN's employee file. During an interview on 3/12/25 at 2:07 p.m. with RN, RN stated he had been working at the facility for approximately three months and had not been assessed for medication administration competency. During a concurrent interview and record review on 3/18/25 at 12:25 p.m. with Director of Nurses (DON), DON reviewed RN's employee file and confirmed medication administration competency for RN was not completed. DON stated it was the facility practice for medication administration assessment to be completed upon hire. During a review of the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Staffing, Sufficient and Competent Nursing, dated 2022, the P&P…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-08 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide supervision for one of two sampled residents (Resident 1) with a diagnosis of dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities), is a high risk for elopement and had a history of elopement. This failure resulted in Resident 1 eloping from the facility without staff being aware and potential for harm. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (AR), undated, the AR indicated Resident 1 was admitted on [DATE]. During a review of Resident 1's Progress Note (PN), dated 11/2/24, at 5:46 p.m. the PN indicated, Another resident [Resident 2] stated that resident [Resident 1] walked out the front door and turned right, and left the facility. Staff member ended up finding resident walking on the sidewalk and brought him back to the facility via car. Resident 1's Elopement Evaluation dated 5/1/24, 7/19/24, and 10/11/24 indicated Resident 1 was a high risk for elopement. Resident 1's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-10-17 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — widespread
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Advanced Directives, when 26 of 30 sampled residents (Resident 292, Resident 63, Resident 341, Resident 49, Resident 17, Resident 50, Resident 32, Resident 61, Resident 46, Resident 52, Resident 2, Resident 12, Resident 5, Resident 4, Resident 65, Resident 15, Resident 85, Resident 60, Resident 56, Resident 35, Resident 31, Resident 23, Resident 57, Resident 69, Resident 78, and Resident 39) did not have an Advance Directive, including the right to accept or refuse medical or surgical treatment, in the residents' medical record. This failure had the potential for the facility to provide treatment and services against multiple residents wishes. Findings: During an interview on 10/15/24 at 12:51 p.m. with admission Coordinator, (AC), AC stated, it was very important for Resident 341 to have Advance Directive. AC stated, the Advanced Directive allowed the facility to know the resident's wishes. During an interview on 10/15/24 at 4:17 p.m. with Resident 292, Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-17 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to follow their policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Laundry and Bedding, Soiled, when one of eight sampled residents (Resident 60) was observed with brown stains on the bed linen. This failure had the potential for Resident 60 to be exposed to infectious disease. During a concurrent observation and interview on 10/14/24 at 10:34 a.m. with Family Member (FM) 2 in Resident 60's room, an unoccupied bed had multiple brown spots on the bed linen. FM 2 stated the bed linen has been dirty for 2 days. FM 2 stated she did not want to sit in a room with dirty bed linen. During a concurrent observation and interview on 10/14/24 at 10:40 a.m. with House Keeping (HK) 1 in Resident 60's room, HK 1 confirmed there were dried brown colored spots on the bed linen. HK 1 stated dirty bed linen should be changed. HK 1 stated it was the responsibility of the Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) to change the bed linen. During a concurrent observation and interview on 10/14/24 at 10:46 a.m. with CNA 6, in Resident 60's room, CNA 6 stated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-17 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow their policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Activities of Daily Living (ADL), Supporting, when oral care was not provided for one of eight sampled residents (Resident 51). This failure had the potential to result in oral discomfort or infections and dental cavities. Findings: During a review of Resident 51's Minimum Data Set (MDS- a federally mandated resident assessment tool), the MDS indicated Resident 51 had a diagnosis of a stroke (brain attack when blood flow to the brain is disrupted causing brain cell death) with hemiplegia (total paralysis of the arm, leg, and trunk on the same side of the body), was fed via a gastrostomy tube (a surgical opening fitted with a device to allow feedings to be administered directly to the stomach common for people with swallowing problems), and was dependent (required another person to perfom task) for oral hygiene. During a review of Resident 51's Order Care Summary (OCS), dated 10/16/24, the OCS indicated, Enteral Feed Order every shift Ensure Oral Care is…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-17 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow their policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Enteral Feedings - Safety Precautions, for one of four sampled residents (Resident 51) when: 1. Enteral nutrition feeding bottle was not labeled. This failure had the potential for old, spoiled, or expired nutritional feedings to be administered to Resident 51. 2. Enteral tubing was disconnected from gastrostomy (G-tube - a surgical inserted tube that provides direct access into the stomach) site a three-way-valve. The three-way-valve was not closed, and stomach contents were leaking onto Resident 51's abdomen and clothing. This failure had the potential for Resident 51's skin to develop sores. Findings: During a review of Resident 51's Minimum Data Set (MDS- resident assessment tool), the MDS indicated Resident 51 had a diagnosis of a stroke (brain attack when blood flow to the brain is disrupted causing brain cell death) with hemiplegia (total paralysis of the arm, leg, and trunk on the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-17 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement pharmacy recommendations for one of 19 sampled residents (Resident 341) after multiple falls. This failure had the potential for staff to be unaware of Resident 341 experiencing adverse consequences from medication and Resident 341 to experience subsequent falls. Findings: During a review of Resident 341's Interim Medication Regimen Review (IMRR), dated 5/11/2024, the IMRR indicated, Type of Review: Change of Condition.Fall.Recommendation.BMP (basic metabolic panel-a common blood test that can be used to screen for, diagnosis[sic], or monitor health conditions).TSH (thyroid-stimulating hormone-blood test that measures the amount of TSH in the blood).BP (blood pressure).HR (Heart Rate).Check orthostatic BPS (blood pressure taken when standing up from a sitting or lying position) Q (every) Shift X (times) 3 days. Notify MD if resident experiences orthostasis (drop in blood pressure when standing). During a review of Resident 341's IMRR, dated 7/12/2024, the IMRR indicated, Type of Review: Change of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-17 · tag F0810 — isolated
    Provide special eating equipment and utensils for residents who need them and appropriate assistance.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow its policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Activities of Daily Living (ADL), Supporting, for providing services for maintaining independence in activities of daily living (ADLs - routine tasks/activities such as eating, bathing, dressing) for one of three sampled residents (Resident 52) when Resident 52 did not have an adaptive device to enable her to drink water independently. This failure resulted in Resident 52 to be dependent upon facility staff. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 10/14/24 at 9:30 a.m. with Resident 52, Resident 52's water cup was on the bedside table out of Resident 52's reach. Resident 52 had contractures (a stiffening/shortening at any joint, that reduces the joint's range of motion) in both hands. Resident 52 stated she was not able to reach her water. Resident 52 stated when she can reach her water cup, it was very difficult to drink without spilling the water. During a concurrent observation and interview on 10/15/24 at 8:15 a.m. with Resident 52, Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-17 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — isolated
    Ensure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff were in-serviced on the elopement binder. This failure had the potential for staff to be unaware of residents that were at risk for elopement. Findings: During a review of the Elopement Binder (EB), the EB indicated, Resident 40, Resident 69, Resident 74, Resident 75, Resident 76, and Resident 294 were high risk for elopement. During a review of the facility's ETP Attendance Roster (ETPAR), dated 2/8/24, the ETPAR indicated, Course Title(s): Elopement Risk/Charge Nurse responsibilities. There were 19 staff that attended the in-service. During an interview on 10/14/24 at 3:35 p.m. with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 1, CNA 1 stated she was unaware of the residents that were at risk for elopement. During an interview on 10/14/24 at 3:44 p.m. with CNA 2, CNA 2 stated the residents at risk for elopement always had a staff with them and all the residents at the facility were elopement risk. During an interview on 10/14/24 at 4:16 p.m. with Administrator, Administrator stated there was an elopement binder located…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-03 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to treat one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) with dignity and respect when Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA 1) used foul language and shooed (make someone go away) Resident 1 away with her hands. This failure resulted in Resident 1 becoming agitated (to feel bothered or worried) and violated Resident 1 ' s rights. Findings: During an interview on 10/3/24 at 10:15 a.m. with Social Service Designee (DSD) and Director of Nurses (DON), SSD stated on 9/28/24 during night shift, two staff (CNA 2 and CNA 3) witnessed CNA 1 using foul language towards Resident 1. DON stated using foul language towards any resident was not acceptable. During a concurrent observation and interview on 10/3/24 at 10:53 a.m. in the dining room, Resident 1 was sitting in a table by himself. Resident 1 was verbal but was unable to answer any questions appropriately. During a review of Resident 1 ' s admission Record (AR), undated, the AR indicated, Resident 1 had a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-19 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — pattern
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure wound treatments were completed for three of three sampled residents (Resident 1, Resident 2, and Resident 3). This failure had the potential for the residents' wounds to worsen. Findings: 1. During a review of Resident 1's Order Summary Report (OSR), dated 9/20/23, the OSR indicated, Flagyl [antibiotic] Oral Tablet.apply to right hip topically every day shift for Stage IV (full thickness skin loss with extensive destruction, exposed bone, tendon, or muscle).Start Date 8/31/23. During a review of Resident 1's Treatment Administration Record (TAR), dated 9/2023, the TAR indicated, Flagyl [antibiotic] Oral Tablet.apply to right hip topically every day shift for Stage IV. There were missing signatures indicating the treatment was not done on 9/9, 9/10, and 9/15. 2. During a review of Resident 2's OSR, dated 9/1/23, the OSR indicated, Cleanse Stage II (shallow open ulcer with a red or pink wound bed) to coccyx (tailbone) with NS, pat dry, apply medihoney (used to decrease bacterial growth in a wound), and cover with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-10-24 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to monitor the temperature in the dry food storage room. This failure had the potential to decrease quality and palatability in the food items being stored. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 10/17/22, at 12:20 PM, with Dietary Supervisor (DS), in the dry food storage room, no thermometer was found. DS stated, the thermometer in the dry storage room broke a while ago and we have not replaced it, which we should have. DS stated, they had not kept a temperature log for the dry storage room. During a review of the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Storage and Food Supplies, dated 2020, the P&P indicated, The storeroom should be well-lighted, well -ventilated, cool, dry, and clean at all times. Thermometers should be placed in all storage areas and checked frequently. Recommended temperature is 50-85º F. If dry food storage goes over 85º F take corrective action.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-10-24 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain a safe and homelike environment when: 1. Eight of 39 sampled residents (Resident 24, Resident 53, Resident 30, Resident 32, Resident 43, Resident 22, Resident 67, and Resident 74) had holes in the ceiling and dark brown/black stained ceiling tiles in their rooms. This failure resulted in Resident 24, Resident 53, Resident 30, Resident 32, Resident 43, Resident 22, Resident 67, and Resident 74 not having a home like environment and had the potential to adversely affect the health and safety of the residents residing in the facility. 2. The baseboard along the wall of the head of one of one resident's (Resident 33) bed was broken. This failure resulted Resident 33 not having a home like environment and the potential for exposure to vermin infestation. 3. Comfortable sound levels were not ensured during the evening shift for five of six confidential residents and Resident 35 when staff used loud, vulgar, and profane language. This…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-10-24 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — pattern
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure five of five sampled residents (Resident 6, Resident 23, Resident 3, Resident 39 and Resident 51) were free from verbal abuse, when Resident 6 and Resident 23 repeatedly yelled/screamed at each other. This failure resulted in Resident 6, Resident 23, Resident 3, Resident 39, and Resident 51 experiencing mental distress and discomfort, including weeping. Findings: During an observation on 10/17/22, at 3:56 PM, outside of Resident 6 and Resident 23's shared room, voices yelling shut up was heard through the closed door. During an observation on 10/18/22, at 8:36 AM, inside Resident 6 and Resident 23's shared room, two residents could be heard screaming. Resident 6 (in the B bed) was screaming at Resident 23 (in the C bed), You have the face of a bitch, just kill yourself! You are a bastard! Resident 23 replied to Resident 6, Stop bothering me! Resident 6 then said, Shut up, your ugly face bothers you! During this exchange, uniformed staff were observed walking past room without intervening. During an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-10-24 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — pattern
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow standard practices of care when: 1. Physician was not informed of one of one sampled resident's (Resident 23) ongoing and increased behaviors related to schizophrenia (a mental disorder)], which resulted in a discontinuation of Zyprexa [a psychotropic medication used to treat mental disorders]. This failure resulted in the unmet care needs for Resident 23's ongoing psychological conditions. 2. Staff did not follow physician orders to change Lopez valve (a device which allows the administration of medications and feeding through a gastrostomy tube (G-Tube, a feeding tube inserted through the stomach) for one of one sampled G-Tube residents (Resident 33). 3. Staff did not follow physician orders to clean G-tube site as ordered for one of one sampled G-Tube residents (Resident 33). 4. Staff did not follow physician orders to apply Compression Stockings (specialized hosiery designed to help prevent the occurrence of edema/swelling) daily for one of one sampled residents (Resident 71) with edema. 5. Staff did not ensure…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-10-24 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to accurately complete the annual Pre-admission Screening Assessment and Resident Review (PASARR-federal requirement to help ensure that individuals are not incorrectly placed in nursing homes or long term care instead of a psychiatric setting) for one out of one sampled residents (Resident 23). This failure had the potential for Resident 23 to be placed in an inappropriate setting and not receive required services. Findings: During a concurrent interview and record review, on 10/20/22, at 10:35 AM, with Minimum Data Set Coordinator (MDSC), Resident 23's PASARR assessment, dated 5/23/22, was reviewed. The PASARR for Resident 23 indicated she did not have a diagnosed mental disorder such as schizophrenia (a serious mental disorder, characterized by seeing or hearing things that are not there, and disorganized thinking). MDSC stated, she was aware Resident 23's diagnosis of schizophrenia. The MDSC stated, she completed the PASARR, and it was incorrect by not documenting Resident 23's schizophrenia diagnosis.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-10-24 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a baseline care plan was developed and implemented for one of one edentulous [no natural teeth] residents (Resident 41). This failure had the potential for Resident 41 to have unmet care needs. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 10/18/22, at 9:05 AM, with Family Member (FM) 3, in Resident 41's room, Resident 41 was observed with no upper and lower teeth. FM 3 stated, Her [Resident 41] dentures are at home. She doesn't want to wear them. They may be loose. During a concurrent interview and record review on 10/19/22, at 9:15 AM, with Infection Preventionist (IP/LVN), Resident 41's plan of care were reviewed. IP/LVN was unable to find a plan of care initiated and developed to address Resident 41 lack of teeth and dentures. During a review of the facilities policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Dental Services, dated 6/1/22, the P&P indicated, Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines. 1. The dental needs of each resident are identified through. MDS [Minimum Data Set an assessment…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-10-24 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure two of 39 sampled residents (Resident 23 and Resident 71) had comprehensive care plans developed and implemented for their person-centered care. This failure resulted in Resident 23 and Resident 71 not having their needs met. Findings: During an observation on 10/17/22, at 1:34 PM, in Resident 71's room, Resident 71's legs were swollen from the knees down and had a shiny appearance. Resident 71 was noted sitting in a recliner with the footrest down, wearing sandals, with no compression stockings [specialized hosiery designed to help prevent the occurrence of edema/swelling] on. During a review of Resident 71's physician order (PO), dated 9/30/22, the PO indicated, Resident 71 had an order for compression stockings to be applied daily to BLE (Bilateral Lower Extremities) for Edema in the morning and remove per schedule. During a review of Resident 71's Comprehensive Care Plans, Resident 71's Comprehensive Care Plans did not include a care plan for Resident 71's bilateral lower extremity edema or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-10-24 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolated
    Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide hearing aids or other devices to maintain resident's communication abilities for one of one sampled residents identified of being hard of hearing (Resident 71). This failure resulted in Resident 71 not being able to communicate effectively. Findings: During an observation on 10/17/22, at 3:34 PM, in Resident 71's room, Resident 71 was very hard of hearing and only understood if spoken to loudly, directly into her ears. No hearing aids were seen. During a concurrent interview and record review on 10/19/22, at 2:55 PM, with Social Services Manager (SSM), Resident 71's Physician's Order (PO) dated 9/30/22 was reviewed. The PO indicated, on 8/30/22, a hearing aid consult was ordered. SSM stated, the hearing consult didn't happen due to other more critical things going on with the Resident 71 and the facility decided to wait on the consultation. SSM stated, FM 2 was informed Resident 71's hearing consult was put on hold. SSM unable to provide documentation of a completed hearing aid consultation for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-10-24 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure an alternative means of communication for one of one sampled non-English speaking residents (Resident 41). This failure resulted in Resident 41 unable to communicate her needs and had the potential for unmet care needs. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 10/17/22, at 1:10 PM, with Infection Preventionist/Licensed Vocational Nurse (IP/LVN), in Resident 41's room, Resident 41 was lying in bed, awake, and verbally responsive. IP/LVN stated, She [Resident 41] doesn't speak English. She's from [Name of country]. IP/LVN stated, Resident 41 should have a communication card at bedside. IP/LVN was unable to find a communication card at Resident 41's bedside. During a review of the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Communicating with Persons with Limited English Proficiency, dated 6/1/22, the P&P indicated, It is the policy of this facility to take reasonable steps to ensure that persons with Limited English Proficiency (LEP) have meaningful access and an equal opportunity to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-10-24 · tag F0687 — failed to care for feet properly — isolated
    Provide appropriate foot care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on an observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide foot care for one of two sampled residents (Resident 53). This failure resulted in Resident 53 having untrimmed toenails which had the potential to result in skin irritation including skin tears/damage and toenail infections. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 10/20/22, at 10:14 AM, in Resident 53's room, with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 4, Resident 53's toenails were noted to extend beyond the nailbed, were thick and curled. CNA 4 stated, Resident 53's toenails were long and needed to be trimmed. During an observation and interview on 10/20/22, at 2:02 PM, in Resident 53's room, with Social Services Manager (SSM), Resident 53's toenails were noted as long, jagged, and sharp with the large toe nail curling under. SSM stated, the toenails could cut Resident 53. During a concurrent interview and record review on 10/20/22, at 1:50 PM, with SSM, Resident 53's clinical record was reviewed. SSM stated, there were no records of podiatry services for Resident 53. SSM stated,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-10-24 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a safe environment for two of two sampled residents (Resident 41 and Resident 54) when: 1. One screener (unlicensed, untrained person, whose function is to screen visitors and staff for symptoms of COVID-19) assisted Resident 41 with a transfer from her bed to her wheelchair. This failure resulted in Resident 41's fall during transfer from her bed to the wheelchair. 2. Licensed nurses did not complete the post fall monitoring and a neuro checks for Resident 54 for multiple unwitnessed falls. This failure had the potential for Resident 54 to have unknown injuries during seven unwitnessed falls and two fractures. Findings : 1. During an interview on 10/18/22, at 12:15 PM, with Family Member (FM) 3, FM 3 stated, [Resident 41] fell the first time she got here while she was in therapy [8/17/22]. She also fell three weeks ago during transfer from bed to wheelchair with one [Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA)]. FM 3 stated, Resident 41 needed two person…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-10-24 · tag F0696 — isolated
    Provide appropriate care/assistance for a resident with a prosthesis.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a plan of care for one of one sampled resident's (Resident 23) prosthetic (artificial device to replace a missing body part) eye. This failure resulted in the staff being unaware of the plan of care for Resident 23's missing eye. Findings: During an interview on 10/19/22, at 6:52 PM, with Family Member (FM) 1, FM 1 asked about the resident's prosthetic eye. FM 1 stated, when she last visited, Resident 23 was not wearing the prosthetic eye. During a concurrent observation and interview on 10/20/22, at 2:02 PM, with Social Services Manager (SSM), in Resident 23's room, Resident 23 was noted not wearing the prosthetic eye. SSM stated, Resident 23 used to have a prosthetic eye,But I haven't seen it in a long time. During a concurrent interview and record review on 10/24/22, at 10:26 AM, with the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON), the ADON stated, she could not find a care plan that addressed the prosthetic eye. The ADON stated, she could not find a physician's order that addressed the care…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-10-24 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide effective pain management for one of one sampled residents (Resident 23). This failure resulted in Resident 23's unmanaged pain, psychological distress, and refusal of care. Findings: During an observation on 10/18/22, at 10:14 AM, Resident 23 was noted to be crying out in pain, stating her right leg hurts bad, I am in a lot of pain. Resident 23's right leg was noted to be contracted (stiffening of the joints) and bent at the knee, with sole of her foot resting against the inner thigh of her upper left leg. During a concurrent observation and interview on 10/19/22, at 7:48 AM, with Resident 23, Resident 23 was noted to be yelling and crying out from down the hall. Upon entering the room, Resident 23 was noted to be crying and cradling her left hand. Resident 23 stated, my left hand is in a lot of pain, I don't know why. Resident 23's left hand was noted with severe contracture, and had a foam hand roll in the palm. Tears were noted to Resident 23's cheeks. Resident 23 rated her pain on a scale between…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-10-24 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff provided non-pharmological interventions for one of one sampled residents (Resident 33) on a psychotropic medication (medication that affects brain activities associated with mental processes and behavior). This failure had the potential for Resident 33 to experience increased risks such as dizziness, severe drowsiness, loss of consciousness and nausea or vomiting associated with the use of Buspirone HCL [hydrochloride] [Buspar - a psychotropic medication used to treat anxiety]. Findings: During a review of Psychiatric F/U (Follow-up) Note (PFUN), dated 6/13/22, the PFUN indicated, Buspirone HCL 15 mg [milligram - a unit of measurement] via GT [gastrostomy tube - a tube inserted through the stomach) Q [every] 12 hours. During a review of Resident 33's Order Summary Report (OSM), dated 9/27/22, the OSM indicated, buspPIRone [sic] 15 mg Give 1 tablet via G-Tube three times a day for anxiety. During a concurrent interview and record review on 10/19/22, at 10:09 AM, with Infection Preventionist/Licensed Vocational…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-10-24 · tag F0790 — failed to provide dental care — isolated
    Provide routine and 24-hour emergency dental care for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a dental follow-up and services were provided to one of one sampled residents (Resident 41) with dentures. This failure resulted in Resident 41 not receiving dental services. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 10/18/22, at 9:05 AM, with Family Member (FM) 3, in Resident 41's room, Resident 41 was observed with no upper and lower teeth (edentulous). FM 3 stated, Resident 41's dentures were at home. FM 3 stated, Resident 41 doesn't like to wear the dentures because they are loose in her mouth. During a concurrent interview and record review on 10/19/22, at 9:15 AM, with Infection Preventionist/Licensed Vocational Nurse (IP/LVN), Resident 41's assessments and documentation were reviewed. IP/LVN stated, Resident 41 was edentulous. IP/LVN was unable to find documentation Resident 41 had a referral to a dentist. During a concurrent interview and record review on 10/19/22, at 9:25 AM, with Social Service Manager (SSM), SSM assessment and progress notes were reviewed. SSM was unable to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-10-24 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure an accurate Treatment Administration Record (TAR), for one of one sampled residents (Resident 71). This failure resulted in the incorrect documentation of Resident 71 had compression stockings (specialized hosiery for residents with swollen legs) applied according to the physician order (PO). Findings: During a review of Resident 71's Physician Orders (PO), dated 9/30/22, the PO indicated, Resident 71 had a PO for Compression stockings to be applied daily to BLE [Bilateral Lower Extremities] for Edema (swelling) in the morning and remove per schedule. During a concurrent observation and interview on 10/19/22, at 11:55 AM, with Registered Nurse (RN) 2, and Resident 71, in Resident 71's room, Resident 71's bilateral legs and ankles were swollen and shiny in appearance. RN 2 confirmed Resident 71 was not wearing compression stockings. Resident 71 stated, They've [staff] never put them on me, but if I had some [compression stockings] I would try them, my legs are so big! During a concurrent interview and record review,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-10-24 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to: 1. Label and date irrigation syringes for two of two sampled residents (Resident 80 and Resident 33) with gastrostomy tube (G-tube - a feeding tube inserted through the stomach) feedings. 2. Follow facility policy and procedure (P&P) for hand hygiene for two of two sampled residents (Resident 33 and Resident 67) when exiting or entering resident rooms and between resident care 3. Follow facility policy and procedure (P&P) for hand hygiene for one of one sampled residents (Resident 78) during wound care. These failures had the potential to place residents, staff, and visitors at risk for infection. Findings: 1 a. During a concurrent observation and interview on 10/17/22, at 12:46 PM, with Infection Preventionist/Licensed Vocational Nurse (IP/LVN), in Resident 80's room, Resident 80 was lying in bed, with a G-tube feeding administered with G-tube pump. One irrigation syringe (used to administer G-tube feeding and medications) hung on the G-tube pump pole. The used irrigation syringe was neither labeled nor…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$164,778 in federal fines across 3 penalties. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

  • $24,252 — penalty dated 2025-08-21
  • $64,200 — penalty dated 2025-03-12
  • $76,326 — penalty dated 2024-10-03
  • Medicare payment denial — starting 2025-05-09 for 5 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
MCCLUNG, BARBRAIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 04/01/2009
MOYLE, KENSETTIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL70%since 04/01/2009
MAGNOLIA HEALTH CORPORATIONOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 04/01/2009
ANDRIGHETTO, PATTYIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 07/16/2011
LAWRENCE, MICHELLEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 10/28/2009
MOYLE, LINDSEYIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 04/01/2009

CMS files one row per role, so the 9 rows in the source record cover these 6 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$12.8M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+20.1%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 69%Medicare 14%Other / private 17%

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$339per resident / day
operating cost
$10,306per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$425per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in California
$12,167/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$15,178/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,000/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 555658. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-02-26, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next