The Villas At Poway
15615 Pomerado Rd, Poway, CA 92064 · Government - Hospital district · 129 certified beds · (858) 613-4545 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
- a high payroll-based staffing rating (5/5)
- lower-than-typical staff turnover (12% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Oct 2024
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has 1 actual-harm citation
- a high number of inspection citations overall (40) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $57,124 in federal fines (most recent 2024-10-21)
- its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 3 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 5 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 5 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 5 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 4 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 4 to 5 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 4.5% | 10.2% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 3.5% | 4.0% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.8% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 5.9% | 1.2% | 2.0% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 1.1% | 7.3% | 6.5% | better |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 10.4% | 0.4% | 0.1% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 1.7% | 1.6% | 3.3% | typical for the state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 4.9% | 9.8% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 17.8% | 13.7% | 18.9% | typical |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 89.9% | 98.2% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 2.1% | 4.3% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 3.0% | 10.2% | 21.2% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 10.1% | 12.0% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.9% | 1.5% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 82.6% | 93.2% | 79.4% | typical |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 21.5% | 23.0% | 22.6% | typical |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 5.7% | 11.2% | 12.0% | better |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
72.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 258 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 26.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 120 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.53 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 83% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 37% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 72.6%CMS range 67.8–77.6 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | better than U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 8.6%CMS range 6.3–11.5 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 26.7% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 22.5% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 23.3% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 48.3% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 100.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 99.1% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 2.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 4.7%CMS range 2.5–8.2 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.76 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 129 beds and averages 85.3 residents a day — about 66% occupied, or roughly 44 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 6.90 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 2.33 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.29 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 6.10 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 7.23 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 2.54 to 1.82 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 12% is below the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
40 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 29 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · G2024-10-21 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure Resident 7 was not abused. As a result, Resident 7 experienced abuse from two staff members. In addition, other residents who were cognitively impaired (problem with the ability to think, learn, remember, use judgement, and make decisions) had the potential to suffer abuse from the two staff members. Findings: On 9/4/24 at 9:50 A.M., an unannounced visit was made to the facility in response to a reported abuse incident. An observation was conducted on 9/4/24 at 12:49 P.M. Resident 7 was sitting in a wheelchair in the hallway with other residents. Resident 7 had a frown on her face and was hugging a doll. A review of Resident 7 ' s record was conducted. Per the facility ' s face sheet, Resident 7 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The Physician Progress Note, dated 8/8/24 indicated Resident 7 ' s diagnoses including senile dementia (a progressive decline leading to loss of memory, language, problem solving, other thinking…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-22 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — patternProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to obtain residents' weight upon admission for seven of 18 sampled residents (36, 280, 282, 430, 19, 9, 3). In addition, the facility did not ensure input and outputs (I & Os) were documented accurately for one sampled resident (Resident 73) on intravenous (IV - giving medications, fluids, or nutrients directly into the bloodstream through a needle or tube inserted into a vein) medications. These failures had the potential to delay identification of risk factors related to nutrition and hydration for Resident 2, 36, 280, 282, 430, 19, 9, 3, and 73. Findings: 1. Resident 36 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Congestive Heart Failure (CHF-a heart disorder which causes the heart to not pump the blood efficiently, sometimes resulting in leg swelling), per the facility's Patient Information. 2. Resident 280 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included hypertension (high blood pressure), per the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-22 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure infection control procedures were followed when: A. Resident 36 and Resident 282 were not identified and placed on enhanced barrier precautions (EBP - involves gown and glove use during high-contact resident care activities for residents [example: residents with medical devices]), and licensed staff did not wear a gown when providing care to Resident 36 and Resident 282. B. Licensed Nurses (LN) did not perform hand hygiene (a process of washing hands or using a hand sanitizer) while dispensing medications, when changing gloves in a contact precaution room, and did not sanitize stethoscope and pulse oximeter after resident use. C. A bottle of body spray was found in the drawer of respiratory cart. These failures had the potential for cross contamination and spread of infection between residents, visitors and staff. Findings: A 1.Resident 36's Information Record indicated Resident 36 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-22 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to treat one of seven residents reviewed for resident rights, in a dignified manner when one resident (Resident 47) waited for 30 minutes to be served her meal while the other residents ate their meals. This deficient practice had the potential for Resident 47's self-esteem and self-worth to be devalued. Findings: According to the facility's Patient Information, Resident 47 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included hypertension (high blood pressure). On 5/19/25, at 11:30 A.M., an observation was conducted of dining room lunch service. On 5/19/25. at 12:03 P.M., lunch meal trays were passed out to the seven residents in the dining room. On 5/19/25, at 12:07 P.M., all but one meal tray were served. Resident 47's tray was not served. On 5/19/25, at 12:30 P.M., an interview was conducted with Resident 47. Resident 47 stated she does not know why it is taking so long for her lunch tray. She stated it made her feel…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-22 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure Advance Directive information was provided to a resident (Resident 10). This failure had the result for Resident 10 to not have the opportunity to express wishes for care if capacity for decision making was lost. Findings: On 5/19/25 Resident 10's clinical record was reviewed. Resident 10 was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] per the facility's Patient Information. A document titled Advance Directive Acknowledgment dated 2/19/19, 4/19/19, and 2/13/24 indicated, I do not have an Advance Directive, however, I am interested in receiving an Advance Directive Brochure . which was initialed by Resident 10 and Resident 10's family member. There was no notation on either of the forms of whether the brochure was given to the resident or family member. On 05/21/25 at 08:29 A.M., a joint review of Resident 10's record was conducted with the Patient Financial Advocate (PFA). The PFA stated there was no documentation of whether Resident 10 received the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-22 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolatedKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to protect confidential information for one unsampled resident (Resident 15). This failure had the potential for Resident 15's confidential health information to be accessed by unauthorized individuals. Findings: On 5/19/25 Resident 15's clinical record was reviewed. Resident 15 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] per the facility's Patient Information with a diagnosis of Respiratory Failure (when the lungs cant properly exchange oxygen). On 5/21/25 at 8:37 A.M., an observation and interview was conducted with LN 1 during preparation for medication administration for Resident 15. LN 1 was observed putting the packaging for Prosource no carb 102 (a supplement used to increase protein intake) into the medication cart trash. The identification label attached to the Prosource packaging had Resident 15's first and last name on it. LN 1 stated she should have put Resident 15's identification label into the confidential bin. On 5/21/25 at 3:38…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-22 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure dialysis (the process of cleaning the blood through a machine) access site was properly cared for one of one resident reviewed for dialysis (Resident 19). This deficient practice had the potential for Resident 19's dialysis access to clot. Findings: Resident 19 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD - kidney failure), per the facility's Patient Information. On 5/19/25 at 11:03 A.M., an interview was conducted with Resident 19 in her room. Resident 19 stated she was a dialysis resident and scheduled for dialysis on Tuesday, Thursday, and Saturday. Resident 19 showed her right arm dialysis access site. On 5/20/25 at 4 P.M., an observation and an interview were conducted with Resident 19 in her room. Resident 19 was up in her wheelchair. Resident 19 stated she came back from her dialysis at 1 P.M. and showed a dressing on her right upper arm dialysis access site. Resident 19…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-22 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolatedEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure four of four license nurses were knowledgeable in assessing the thrill and bruit (thrills are palpable, vibratory sensations felt on the skin, while bruits are abnormal, audible sounds heard through a stethoscope) related to dialysis (the process of cleaning the blood through a machine) access. This failure had the potential for dialysis access to develop complications that may not be identified timely and addressed. Findings: Resident 19 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD - kidney failure), per the facility's, Patient Information. On 5/19/25 at 11:03 A.M., an interview was conducted with Resident 19 in her room. Resident 19 stated she was a dialysis resident and scheduled for dialysis on Tuesday, Thursday, and Saturday. Resident 19 showed her right arm dialysis access site. On 5/20/25 at 4 P.M., an observation and an interview were conducted with Resident 19 in her…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-22 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the controlled drug record (CDR- an accounting of controlled medications, drugs with a high abuse potential) reconciled with the medication administration record (MAR- documentation that a resident received a medication) for one of three residents (Resident 3 ). As a result, this failure had the potential for the facility to be unable to readily identify drug diversion (illegal distribution or abuse of prescription drugs) of controlled medications. Findings: Resident 3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] per the facility's Patient Information sheet. A record review of Resident 3's physician's order, CDR, and MAR was performed. Resident 3's physician's order dated 3/19/24, indicated the Resident was to receive oxycodone 5 milligrams (medication used to relieve pain) one tab every six hours as needed for moderate to severe pain. A review of Resident 3's CDR indicated 3 doses of the resident's oxycodone 5 milligrams was removed from the locked…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-22 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications in carts were properly stored and labeled when the following was found in two of twenty medication carts: 1. An expired insulin pen. 2. A use by sticker on a medication bottle was illegible. 3. There was a white pill in an unlabeled medication cup. As a result, medications had the potential to be improperly administered. Findings: On [DATE] at 3:39 P.M., an observation and interview was conducted with Licensed Nurse (LN) 2 during a review of a medication cart. Lantus 100 units/mL (milliliter) pen (a medication given to lower blood sugar), was found in the top drawer of the medication cart labeled with an orange sticker: do not use after [DATE]. LN 2 stated when insulin was opened the nurse put an orange sticker with the use by date on the insulin pen. LN 2 stated insulin once opened was good for 28 days. LN 2 stated nurses were supposed to check the date and double check the time to discard since the insulin is not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-22 · tag F0841 — isolatedDesignate a physician to serve as medical director responsible for implementation of resident care policies and coordination of medical care in the facility.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the Medical Director (MD) participated in the development and implementation of written policies and procedures, related to the care of residents receiving dialysis services. This had the potential to affect the effectiveness and quality of care delivered to residents on dialysis. (Cross reference to F698 and F726) Findings: On 5/22/25 at 4:15 P.M., a telephone interview was conducted with the MD. The MD stated part of his role was to participate and attend the QAPI (Quality Assessment and Improvement Plan) meeting. Participate in the development and implementation of written policies governing the medical, nursing and related health care services provided in the facility, and oversight with the physician provider. The MD stated he was not aware there was no written policy and procedure for nursing care of dialysis residents and no inservice training provided to the licensed nurses (LN) in assessing dialysis access. The MD stated that there should have been a policy and procedure for nursing to follow standard care…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 29 citations
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-22 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure accurate documentation related to: 1. Advance Directives for two residents (10, 131). 2. A documentation for a resident's capacity to understand and make decisions was missing for one resident (40) 3. Resident's consent for treatment was incomplete (40). This failure resulted in conflicting records regarding the presence of Advance Directives (10, 31) and did not provide an accurate representation of the care provided and had the potential to cause confusion amongst care providers (40). Findings: 1a. On 5/19/25 Resident 10's clinical record was reviewed. Resident 10 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] per the facility's Patient Information. A document titled Advance Directive Acknowledgment dated 2/19/19, 4/19/19, and 2/13/24 indicated, I do not have an Advance Directive, however, I am interested in receiving an Advance Directive Brochure . and was initialed by Resident 10 and Resident 10's family member. On 05/21/25 at 10:57 A.M., a joint…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-21 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to implement policies and procedures for abuse when: a licensed nurse (LN) did not report a witnessed abuse of one resident. (Resident 7). This failure resulted in an incomplete investigation and protection of residents from the perpetrators. Findings: Resident 7 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], per Resident 7 ' s face sheet. The Physician Progress Note, dated 8/8/24, indicated Resident 7 ' s diagnoses included senile dementia (a progressive decline leading to loss of memory, language, problem solving, other thinking abilities and loss of independence in daily activities). Resident 7 ' s Minimum Data Set (MDS- a federally mandated resident assessment tool) dated 7/31/24, section C0700 through section C1000, indicated that Resident 7 had short and long-term memory problem, memory/recall problem, and had severely impaired daily decision making. An interview with certified nursing assistant (CNA) 5 was conducted on 9/4/24 at 10:50 A.M.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-21 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff reported a witnessed physical abuse of a resident (Resident 7) who was cognitively impaired (problem with the ability to think, learn, remember, use judgement, and make decisions) to the facility's administration. This deficient practice had the potential for actual and/or alleged abuse incidents to be unreported and not investigated. In addition, this failure had the potential for residents to be unprotected from abuse. Findings: A review of Resident 7 ' s clinical record was conducted. Resident 7 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], per Resident 7 ' s face sheet. The Physician Progress Note, dated 8/8/24, indicated Resident 7 ' s diagnoses included senile dementia (a progressive decline leading to loss of memory, language, problem solving, other thinking abilities and loss of independence in daily activities). Resident 7 ' s Minimum Data Set (MDS- a federally mandated resident assessment tool) dated 7/31/24, section…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-06 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a person-centered care plan was updated for one of three residents (Resident 1) reviewed with osteoporosis (bone disease; weak, brittle bones). This failure had the potential to miscommunicate care related to Resident 1 ' s health and safety when providing care, assistance, and repositioning for Resident 1. Findings: A record review of Resident 1's face sheet (contains demographic information) indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included respiratory failure (a serious health condition; difficulty breathing). A record review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS; nursing assessment tool), section B0100, dated 11/14/23, indicated .comatose . persistent vegetative state /no discernible consciousness (individual does not show signs of awareness). This section was coded as yes. A record review of Resident 1's portable chest x-ray, signed by the medical doctor (MD), dated 1/5/23, indicated .Probable small…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-28 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to implement transmission based infection control measures when Licensed Nurse (LN) 2 entered the room of a resident (Resident 1) who tested positive for COVID-19 (an infectious disease caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus) without the required personal protective equipment (PPE, equipment worn to minimize exposure to infection and injury in the workplace). This failure had the potential to increase the risk of COVID-19 transmission to all residents, staff, and visitors at the facility. Findings Include: Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of respiratory failure, per the residents admission record. On 12/5/23 at 11:31 AM an interview was conducted with LN 1 in the hallway outside Resident 1's room. LN 1 stated Resident 1 had tested positive on the routine rapid antigen test for COVID-19 this morning. On 12/5/23 at 11:53 AM an observation and interview were conducted with LN 2 outside of Resident 1's room. LN 2 was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-18 · tag F0625 — isolatedNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to offer bed hold for two residents who were transferred to the acute hospital. (Resident 5 and Resident 6) This failure had the potential for the residents to not be aware of their choice to hold a bed at the facility when transferred to the hospital. Findings: Resident 5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including wound care, leaking colostomy (an opening for the colon or large intestine through the abdomen) according to the facility ' s Patient Information. On 9/14/23, at 11:36 A.M., a concurrent review of Resident 5 ' s nursing note with the Director of Nursing (DON) was conducted. The DON stated Resident 5 was transferred to the hospital on 3/23/23 due to shortness of breath, with cold and clammy skin. During an interview and concurrent record review on 9/14/23, at 12:10 P.M., with the nursing supervisor (NS), the NS stated if a resident was transferred to the hospital, the nursing staff called the resident or the responsible party…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-03-23 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — widespreadEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and document reviews, the facility failed to ensure the menu was designed to meet the nutritional needs of the residents on pureed diets. This failure led to twelve (12) residents on pureed diets to receive fewer calories and nutrients which had the potential to further impair their nutrition and health status. Cross reference F804 Findings: During a review of the facility's undated therapeutic menu spreadsheet titled Week 2, Tuesday, 3/21/23, the Regular Diet lunch meal was 3 ounces (oz.) oven fried chicken breast, ½ cup mashed potatoes, ½ cup sauteed green beans and cherry tomatoes, 8 ounces (oz.) 1% milk, 6 oz. creamy lentil soup, 2 saltine crackers, and 1 iced brownie. The Dysphagia Pureed Diet lunch meal included a 3 oz. turkey puree with 1 oz. chicken gravy, 3 oz. corn puree, 3 oz. green beans puree, 8 oz. 1% milk, and 1 orange jello gelatin cup. During an observation and interview on 3/21/23 at 10:03 A.M. of the lunch meal food production in the main kitchen, the A.M. [NAME] (CK) 1 prepared 15 pre-packaged pureed food items, entrées, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-03-23 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food safety and sanitation protocols were maintained in the kitchen according to standards of practice and facility policy when: 1. Loading dock area, dumpster cart, and area in front of the dumpster were not free of kitchen waste. 2. Ten (10) kitchen floor sink drains were dirty and filled with food waste. 3. An Ice Machine was not properly maintained and cleaned per manufacturer guidelines. 4. An expired supplement was found in a nourishment room refrigerator in the facility nursing station. These failures exposed residents to unsanitary practices in the kitchen, which had the potential to contaminate the food and place residents at risk of developing a foodborne illness. Cross reference F814, F908, and F925 Findings: 1. During a concurrent observation and interview on 03/20/23 at 2:34 P.M. with Food Service Worker 1 (FSW1), FSW 1 demonstrated how he removed trash from the kitchen. There were several foul soiled kitchen wastes…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-03-23 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — widespreadDispose of garbage and refuse properly.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure: 1. Loading dock, dumpster cart, and area in front of the dumpster were free of kitchen waste. 2. Food and Nutrition department floor sink drains were free from food waste. These failures provided an unsanitary environment in the kitchen that harbored pests and had the potential to contaminate resident food. The nursing home census was 109 residents. Cross reference F812, F925 Findings: 1. During a kitchen observation of the garbage disposal and concurrent interview on 03/20/23 at 2:34 P.M., Food Service Worker 1 (FSW1) demonstrated the trash removal process from the kitchen. FSW1 brought trash bags in garbage can to dock. FSW1 went down service lift to get dumpster cart. Food debris and garbage from kitchen was observed between lift and dock. FSW1 put the trash bags in the trash cart from the dock. FSW1 then climbed down from the loading dock and then he pushed trash cart to dumpster lift, which put the cart contents into dumpster and compressed contents. Foul smelling kitchen waste was observed at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-03-23 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — widespreadKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and document reviews the facility failed to ensure: 1. One ice machine in the main kitchen was maintained in a safe operating condition. 2. One ice machine in the skilled nursing facility (SNF) was maintained and cleaned according to manufacturer's guidelines and standards of practice. This failure created the potential for residents to receive and consume ice from machines that were contaminated with substances resembling mold and other hazardous chemicals, that could lead to foodborne illness and impair health status. The facility census was 109. Cross reference F812 Findings: 1. On 3/20/23 at 8:40 A.M., during the initial kitchen tour, a concurrent observation and interview was conducted with the Patient Service Supervisor (PSS). Ice machine #15 was observed to be empty, no ice in bin. Machine log read machine was cleaned on 3/19/23. No signs indicating the ice machine was out of service were present on the machine. PSS stated she believed the Ice machine #15 in the main kitchen, stopped working on 3/19/23 during the night shift. The ice bin was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-03-23 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — widespreadMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the main kitchen area and the skilled nursing home (SNF) were free of pests. This failure had the potential to contaminate food prepared, stored and served to facility residents, which could lead to widespread foodborne illness. The facility census was 109. Cross reference F812, F814 Findings: During the initial kitchen tour on 3/20/23 at 8:45 A.M., multiple fruit flies were observed flying around hand washing sinks and food prep sinks. On 3/20/23 at 2:35 P.M., an observation of exterior loading dock was conducted enroute to trash disposal area. A large electronic bug zapper light was on the outside wall at the back exit door entrance exit to kitchen with dozens of dead flies, other insects, and spider webs. The Foodservice Manager (FSM) and Foodservice Director (FSD) acknowledged the dirty electronic bug light with dead insect carcasses and spider webs and stated it should be clean. During an observation on 3/21/23 at 8:05 A.M. of the SNF's Education Room there were multiple dead pest carcasses…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-03-23 · tag F0557 — patternHonor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 4. Resident 39 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included respiratory failure, per the facility's Patient Information record. On 3/20/23 at 1:53 P.M., and 3/21/23 at 8:26 A.M., an observation was conducted of Resident 39 as she laid in bed. A urinary catheter bag was attached to the right side of the bed frame. The urinary catheter drainage bag contained pale yellow urine and was visible from the hallway. A dignity bag (a dark colored bag, used to promote dignity of catheterized patients by concealing urinary drainage bags from public view) was not present. On 3/20/23, Resident 39's clinical record was reviewed: According to the physician's order, dated 7/20/22, .Foley (brand name) Catheter FR #16 (size) monitor every shift . According to the quarterly MDS, (a clinical assessment tool), dated 1/6/23, the cognitive assessment, section C1000, was listed as moderately impaired cognition. Section H0100, indicated the resident had an indwelling urinary catheter. Per the care plan, titled…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-03-23 · tag F0655 — patternCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a written summary of the baseline care plans for three of five residents and/or their representatives (Resident 58, 85 and 402), reviewed for comprehensive care plans. This failure had the potential for residents and/or their representatives of not being informed of the resident's initial plan of care and services. Findings: 1. Resident 58 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. According to the physician's History and Physical, dated 3/6/23, the admitting diagnoses included pelvic (hip bone) fracture (a break in the bone). During a review of Resident 58's MDS (a clinical assessment tool), dated 3/11/23, the MDS indicated, a cognitive score of 13, indicating cognition was intact. During observation and interview on 3/20/23, at 9:55 A.M., Resident 58 was lying in bed with oxygen being administered. Resident 58 stated she had a fall and was receiving therapy at the facility. Resident 58 stated she did not require oxygen before the fall. An alarm…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-03-23 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — patternDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure comprehensive care plans were revised and/or updated for three of five residents (Resident 58, 87 and Resident 402), reviewed for comprehensive care plans when: 1. Resident 58's care plan was not developed for the use of oxygen. 2. Resident 87's care plan for skin integrity did not indicate the current pressure ulcer status, and the use of Negative Wound Pressure Therapy (NWPT- wound vac-suction tubing, and wound dressing to remove excess fluid and any infectious material present in the wound), and Resident 87's wound center follow up appointments. 3. Resident 402's care plan was not updated when Resident 402's current pain medication was ineffective. Failure to revised and/or update the care plans had the potential for delayed care, miscommunication among caregivers, and decreased physical well-being. Findings: 1. Resident 58 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. According to the physician's History and Physical, dated 3/2/23,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-03-23 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — patternSet up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the Quality Assessment and Improvement Plan (QAPI-a plan to improve the overall quality of life and quality of care and services delivered to nursing home residents), failed to identify areas of improvement related to: 1. Weight loss (F-692) 2. Kitchen (F-803, F-812, F-814, F-908, F-925 3. Infection control (F-880) As a result, there was the potential to affect the safety and quality of care for residents. Findings: 1. On 3/23/23 at 2:43 P.M., an interview was conducted with the ADM, I-DON, RD 1 and RD 2. The department heads were informed the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) had not reported any weight loss, according to the last MDS submission. The facility also reported to the survey team via their current Matrix Rooster (a list of residents used by the facility to identify pertinent care areas), dated 3/20/23, there were no residents reported with weight lost. The survey team later identified a resident with significant weight loss. According to RD 2, there was no current QAPI plan identifying issues with weight…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-03-23 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2a. Resident 83 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included right hip fracture with surgical repair, per the facility's Patient Information record. On 3/20/23 at 10:20 A.M., and on 3/21/23 at 8:11 A.M., an observation was conducted of Resident 83 as she laid in bed. Resident 83 was receiving oxygen at 2 liters (Al) via nasal annular, (NC-a flexible plastic tube that delivers oxygen via the nasal cavities). The oxygen tubing had a handwritten label, dated 3/5/23. On 3/20/23, Resident 83's clinical record was reviewed: According to the physician orders, dated 3/4/23, .O 2 at 2 LP (liters per minute) via NC . There was no physician's order of when to change the oxygen tubing and there was documented evidence on Resident 83's MAR or TAR that oxygen tubing had been changed. On 3/21/23 at 12:03 P.M., an interview was conducted with the ICN. The ICN stated oxygen tubing was changed every Sunday night on the P.M. shift (3 P.M. - 11:30 P.M.), for every resident receiving oxygen therapy. The ICN…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-03-23 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure a sensitive (touch pad) call light was available for one of one resident, (Resident 13) reviewed for accommodation of needs. This failure resulted in Resident 13 not getting his needs met. Findings: Resident 13 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included Quadriplegia (paralysis of arms, legs, and body from the neck down), per facility's Patient Information record. During an observation and interview on 3/20/23, at 11:09 A.M., with Resident 13, Resident 13 was in bed sitting upright. Resident 13 stated, he had to yell out for help, because he could not use the push button call light. Resident13 was observed with upper & lower extremity contractures (a stiffening of the muscles). A push button call light was clipped on Resident 13's bed and the resident could not reach for it. During a review of Resident 13's MDS (a assessment tool), dated 2/21/23, the MDS indicated, a cognitive score of 15, indicating he was cognitively…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-03-23 · tag F0638 — isolatedAssure that each resident’s assessment is updated at least once every 3 months.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to conduct a quarterly (every three months) MDS assessment (a clinical tool which is submitted to Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services [CMS]) and submit it to CMS in a timely manner for one of four residents (Resident 74) reviewed for Resident Assessments. As a result, the facility and CMS were delayed in knowing Resident 74's current health status. Findings: Resident 74 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], per the facility's Patient Information record. On 3/22/23 at 7:57 A.M., an interview and record review was conducted with the MDSN. The MDSN stated Resident 74 was originally admitted to the sub-acute unit (medically fragile residents who require special services, such as inhalation therapy), and then transferred to Station C on 12/29/21, where she has remained since. The MDSN reviewed Resident 74's MDS assessments and CMS submissions. Resident 74 had a quarterly assessment completed on 10/6/22, and another quarterly assessment should have been…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-03-23 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow the manufacture's guidelines for low air loss (LAL- a special mattress that provides alternating airflow within the mattress, to relieve pressure), to maintain skin integrity for three of five residents, (Resident 64, 80, 83) reviewed for pressure ulcers. As a result, Residents 64, 80 and 83, had the potential to develop pressure ulcers from incorrect mattress settings. Findings: 1. Resident 64 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included respiratory failure, per the facility's Patient Information record. On 3/20/23 at 2:09 P.M., an observation was conducted of Resident 64 as she laid in bed. Resident 64's LAL mattress was set for a weight of 175-200, with 15-minute intervals of inflation/deflation. Resident 64's weight appeared under 175 pounds. On 3/21/23 at 3:23 P.M., an interview was conducted with CNA 11. CNA 11 stated only the LNs or NP changed the settings on the LAL mattresses, and CNAs did not touch…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-23 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident with very low body weight and severe malnutrition risk was assessed according to the facility policy and standards of practice. This failure had the potential to cause additional weight loss and further compromise the one of 22 sampled residents (Resident 85) nutrition and health status. Cross reference F803, F804, F867 Findings: Per a review of Resident 85's admission Record dated 3/22/23, Resident 85 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of Acute hypoxemic respiratory failure (impaired air exchange between the lungs and blood), and prior medical history of high blood pressure and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD-diseases of the lung that block airflow and makes it difficult to breathe). A review of Resident 85's LTC Nutritional Status document dated 2/3/23 completed by RD 3, indicated .Nutrition Risk Symptoms LTC: Diagnosed Malnutrition .Nutritional Intake Meets Needs (GOAL)= Not Met .decreased appetite;…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-03-23 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and medical record review, the facility failed to ensure two of five residents (Resident 46 and 92) were monitored for side effects of unnecessary drugs. These failures had the potential for Resident 46 and 92 to have side effects that went undetected by staff. Findings: 1. Resident 46's admitted to the facility on [DATE]. According to the physician's history and physical, dated 5/30/22, Resident 46 diagnoses included traumatic brain injury (TBI) and neurocognitive impairment (decreased mental ability) with behavioral problems. A review of Resident 46's initial psychiatric consultation, dated 1/8/20, indicated Resident 46, .has been resistant, easily agitated, and aggressive. He strikes out at caregivers and is refusing all care. A review of physician medication orders for Resident 46, indicated Seroquel (an antipsychotic; class of psychotropic medication used to treat mental/mood disorders), 50 mg (milligram) tablet once a day at bedtime (HS) was started on 12/27/22. The orders indicated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-03-23 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolatedEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident and staff interviews and review of facility documents, the facility failed to ensure that residents meals were served at a palatable and appetizing temperature. This finding had the potential to cause reduced food intake and affect nutrition status among medically vulnerable residents on therapeutic diets. The facility census was 109. Cross reference F803 Finding: During a concurrent interview and document review of the lunch menu on 3/21/23 at 10:03 A.M., the [NAME] 1, (CK1) stated lunch menu for that day consisted of oven fried chicken, mashed potato with gravy, and green beans. CK1 further stated the puree menu consisted of roast turkey with green beans, and corn; the puree were bought pre made frozen in individual molds. On 3/21/23 at 11:50 A.M., an interview with Resident 403 was conducted. Resident 403 stated that, .the veggies were not cooked well enough .and the oatmeal is always cold . Resident 403 further stated his food was not chopped like it was at his previous…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-03-23 · tag F0882 — isolatedDesignate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure to have a full-time, certified infection control nurse (ICN-a professional who ensures healthcare workers and patients are doing all the things they should be doing to prevent infections and the spread of infections), who provides assessment, monitoring, development, implementation and management of the facility's infection prevention and control program. This failure had the potential of negatively affecting the quality of care provided to all residents. Findings: On 3/22/23 at 3:40 P.M., an interview was conducted with the facility's ICN. The ICN stated she worked as the ICN for four hours a day and was fully certified as a ICN. The ICN stated she shared the infection prevention duties with the DSD, who provided education, monitoring, and teaching to residents and staff members. On 3/22/23, at 3:40 p.m., an interview was conducted with the DSD. The DSD stated she was currently in training for certification as an ICN, an was not yet certified. The DSD stated she assisted with infection control training to staff…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-01-30 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of two residents reviewed for dignity, was assisted with meal service in a respectful, and dignified manner (87). As a result, there was the potential for Resident 87 to experience decreased self-worth and self-esteem. Findings: Resident 87 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included cerebrovascular accident (stroke), per the facility's History and Physical. On 1/29/20 at 12:19 P.M., an observation was conducted during lunch meal service in the dining room. Resident 87 was observed in a wheelchair with a table in front of him. Fourteen other resident's were present, seated around tables. A female staff member (LN 11) stood next to Resident 87's left side, holding a soup bowl in the left hand and a spoon in her right hand. The female staff member looked down at Resident 87 while she assisted the resident with eating. On 1/29/20 at 12:22 P.M., an interview was conducted with LN 11. LN 11 stated she…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2020-01-30 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop a care plan for one of three residents (78), reviewed for hearing needs. As a result, there was a potential for Resident 78 to experience decreased socialization and isolation. Findings: On 1/27/20 at 11:16 A.M., an observation was conducted with Resident 78, in her room. Resident 78 did not communicate when asked questions and repeatedly pointed to her left ear. On 1/29/20 at 7:52 A.M., an interview was conducted with CNA 14. CNA 14 stated Resident 78 spoke some English and pointed at things in order to make her needs known. CNA 14 stated he was unaware if Resident 78 had any hearing issues and he had not noticed any hearing assistive devices in her room. On 1/29/20 at 8:02 A.M., an interview and record review was conducted with LN 13, regarding Resident 78. LN 13 stated Resident 78 could not hear very well and she did not have hearing aids. LN 13 could not locate a plan of care for Resident 78's impaired hearing. LN 13 stated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2020-01-30 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to review, evaluate and document Ativan (a medication to treat anxiety) prn (as needed) in the 14 day time frame for continued usage for three of 13 residents reviewed for psychotropic (mind altering) medications (37,54,57). This failure had the potential for residents to receive unnecessary medication. Findings: 1. Resident 37 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included vascular dementia (brain damage caused by multiple strokes) and depressive disorder (depressed mood) per the facility's Patient Information sheet. A review of Resident 37's medical record indicated a physician's order, dated 12/5/19, . Ativan 0.5 mg PO (by mouth) q (every) 6 hours prn for anxiety x 2 months until 2/5/20 . An interview and record review was conducted with LN 6 on 1/30/20 at 10:01 A.M. LN 6 stated that Resident 37 had episodes of anxiety and had received Ativan 0.5 mg 8 times between 12/5/19 and 1/30/20 per the eMar. An interview was conducted on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2020-01-30 · tag F0800 — isolatedProvide each resident with a nourishing, palatable, well-balanced diet that meets his or her daily nutritional and special dietary needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to honor one of two residents meal preferences for a cola beverage (70). This failure had the potential to decrease fluid intake by not honoring resident's preferences. Findings: Resident 70 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included abdominal pain per the facility's Patient Information sheet. An observation was conducted in the facility's dining room on 1/27/20 at 12 P.M. Resident 70's tray had an 8 ounce can of Sprite ( a citrus-flavored soda). Resident 70's meal ticket indicated a request for Coke (a cola-flavored beverage). A concurrent interview and review of Resident 70's lunch ticket was conducted on 1/28/20 at 1:36 P.M. with the DOO/FSN and the FSN Manager. The DOO/FSN stated, He (Resident 70) requested coke, but was served Sprite yesterday (1/27/20). We ran out of coke, because our stock levels were short, and gave Sprite, we should have told the resident; it was a preference issue. A review of the facility's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-01-30 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolatedEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow the menu related to Tuscan vegetables and 2% milk. This failure had the potential to not meet the nutritional needs of residents. Findings: During a dining observations in the facility's dining room on 1/27/20 at 12 P.M., and 1/28/20 at 8:20 A.M., the following were noted: 1. Resident 7 received green beans instead of the Tuscan vegetables that were selected on the luncheon menu; 2. All residents who were supposed to receive 2% milk for breakfast received 1% milk. 1. An interview was conducted with Resident 7 on 1/27/20 at 12:15 P.M. Resident 70 stated, Hey, where are the Tuscan vegetables? Everyone else has them! A review of Resident 7's meal ticket indicated that Tuscan vegetables were selected by Resident 7. An interview and menu review was conducted on 1/28/20 at 1:36 P.M., with the DOO/FNS and the FNS Manager. Resident 7's lunch ticket indicated that he was on a dysphagia chopped diet and that Tuscan vegetables were a choice on the select menu. A review of the facility's dysphagia chopped menu…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-01-30 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolatedProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to remove expired food from one of three refrigerators, and there was no process in place to determine freshness of produce. This failure had the potential to expose residents to foodborne illness. Findings: A tour of the facility's kitchen was conducted on 1/27/20 at 8 A.M., with the FNS Manager. In one refrigerator, there were 1/2 gallons of 2% milk (x 2) that had expiration dates of 1/26/20. The FNS Manager stated, Those are expired, they should not be in here. In addition, there were 4 boxes of portobello mushrooms, five pounds each, in the refrigerator. There was no use by date on the boxes. The mushrooms were inspected and found to be either dried out or covered with a wet, opaque substance. The FNS Manager stated that the mushrooms did not look fresh. The FNS Manager stated, Fresh produce doesn't have a use by date, we look at it to see if it is fresh. An interview was conducted with the DHR on 1/29/20 at 9:47 A.M. The DHR stated, Just looking at produce to see if it is fresh is subjective; a more specific…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$57,124 in federal fines across 10 penalties.
- $16,790 — penalty dated 2024-10-21
- $14,113 — penalty dated 2023-12-26
- $4,196 — penalty dated 2023-11-13
- $3,846 — penalty dated 2023-11-06
- $3,496 — penalty dated 2023-10-30
- $3,147 — penalty dated 2023-10-23
- $2,797 — penalty dated 2023-10-17
- $2,447 — penalty dated 2023-10-10
- $2,098 — penalty dated 2023-10-02
- $4,194 — penalty dated 2023-09-11
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| BAKER, STEPHANIE | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE; CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER | since 02/14/2022 |
| HANSEN, DIANE | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE; CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER | since 10/15/2012 |
| KING, HUBERT | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE; CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER | since 04/18/2022 |
| PIEARSON, JAMI | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE; CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 02/04/2019 |
| WAISHKEY, HELEN | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE; CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER | since 08/30/2021 |
| PALOMAR HEALTH | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 06/24/1966 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 15 rows in the source record cover these 6 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
What families pay in CA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 555301. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-05-22, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.