Plumas District Hospital DP/SNF

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Staffing

CMS has not published payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours for this facility yet — this can happen for newer, hospital-based, or recently-certified homes. It can also mean the home simply did not file, which CMS does not distinguish in this data, so treat the gap as unexplained rather than benign. Staffing is one of the three parts of the CMS star rating; where it’s missing, weigh the independent health-inspection score most, and ask the facility directly about its nurse-to-resident ratios and weekend RN coverage.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

• Potential for harm · E2026-02-10 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident when:The facility failed to ensure the safe disposal and storage of controlled substances when one controlled substance was not double locked according to facility's controlled substance storage policy.The facility failed to ensure the safe and effective use of medication when the policy for medication storage was not implemented for one medication cart. This failure resulted in putting residents at risk of harm from receiving expired and potentially contaminated or ineffective medications.1.During a record review of facility policy titled Medication Administration Controlled Substances dated 1/2025 indicated, Controlled substances remaining in the nursing care center after the order has been discontinued are retained in the nursing care center in a securely double locked area with restricted access until destroyed, as outlined by state regulation.During a concurrent…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-10 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to investigate suspicions of abuse for one resident of eight sampled residents (Resident 6) when:Facility reported that Resident 6's son verbally assaulted Resident 6 and coerced her to give him money and did not investigate.Facility reported that when Resident 6's son visited the facility during the months of January 2026 and February 2026, he yelled and made other residents feel uncomfortable and did not investigate.These failures caused Resident 6 mental anguish and had the potential to cause mental anguish to the rest of the facility residents.During a record review of facility policy titled Abuse and Neglect Prevention and Reporting (undated), indicated Abuse is the willful infliction of injury, unreasonable confinement, intimidation, or punishment with resulting physical harm, pain or mental anguish. Facility policy also indicated It includes verbal abuse, sexual abuse, physical abuse, and mental abuse including abuse facilitated or…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-10 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to revise and implement comprehensive care plans to reflect changes in condition and identified needs for 3 of 8 residents when reviewed for care planning (Residents 2, 6, and 8). These failures had the potential to result in inconsistent care, unmanaged symptoms, and unmet resident needs.Findings: During a record review on 2/9/26 at 3:00 p.m. of Resident 8's admission record, the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including muscle weakness, difficulty walking, dysfunction of the bladder, pressure ulcer of the sacral region, stage 4, chronic pain syndrome, and osteomyelitis. During an observation on 2/9/26 at 10:00 a.m., Resident 8 was observed with an indwelling urinary catheter in place. During a record review on 2/9/26 at 3:00 p.m. of Resident 8's comprehensive care plan dated 1/28/26, the care plan did not include interventions addressing catheter care, monitoring, or associated risks. The care plan did not reflect catheter…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-10 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure appropriate management of an indwelling urinary catheter for 1 of 8 residents reviewed for urinary catheter care (Resident 8) when the facility failed to obtain or maintain a physician order for the catheter, failed to assess and document the continued medical necessity for catheter use, failed to include catheter care and monitoring interventions in the comprehensive care plan, and failed to document routine catheter care. This deficient practice placed Resident 8 at risk for urinary tract infection, urethral trauma, obstruction, and other catheter-related complications. During a record review on 2/9/26 at 3:00 p.m. of Resident 8's admission record, the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including muscle weakness, difficulty walking, dysfunction of the bladder, pressure ulcer of the sacral region, stage 4 (a severe, full-thickness injury characterized by significant tissue loss, where underlying fascia,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

What families pay in CA