No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Crestwood Wellness and Recovery Center

3062 Churn Creek Rd., Redding, CA 96002 · For profit - Corporation · 99 certified beds · (530) 221-0976 Medicaid only — no Medicare

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Flagged for abuse
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • no harm-level citations in the current inspection record
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • lower-than-typical staff turnover (31% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
Worth asking about
  • CMS has flagged it for abuse
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Jan 2026
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

3/5
CMS overall
3 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★ 2/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
691 Maragila Street · (530) 722-1111 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
2880 Churn Creek Rd · (530) 226-5530 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
1109 Hartnell Ave · (530) 226-9880 · Call to confirm hours
Park
955 Hartnell Ave · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
1313 Hartnell Ave · (530) 526-8569

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 5 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating3★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased3.3%10.2%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight0.8%4.0%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.6%0.8%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.8%1.2%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms3.8%7.3%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.4%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury1.9%1.6%3.3%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened4.5%9.8%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication46.1%13.7%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%98.2%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers0.0%4.3%4.7%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control4.1%10.2%21.2%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table100.0%12.0%17.1%check this — see note marked dagger below the table
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days0.452.251.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days0.571.571.80better

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

This value is several times the typical-state benchmark. It can be real, or it can be a coding artifact in what the facility submitted. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Staffing

0.25
RN hours/ resident / day
1.27
LPN hours/ resident / day
0.95
Aide hours/ resident / day
2.47
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.20
RN hoursweekends
31.1%
Total nursing turnover
16.7%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 99 beds and averages 90.3 residents a day — about 91% occupied, or roughly 9 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.47 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.25 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 0.95 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 1.87 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 2.71 on weekdays — 31% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.27 to 0.20 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 31% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

2
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-06-04)
2
at the previous standard inspection (2024-06-20)

Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

14 citations, most serious first — scroll within the box to see all.

  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-09 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews the facility failed to protect the rights of one out of four sampled residents (Resident 1) to be free from physical abuse by Resident 2 when Resident 2 hit Resident 1 in the face. This resulted in Resident 1 sustaining bruising to the right side of the face that lasted for 15 days. Findings: A review of the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Crisis Intervention Program, updated 6/1/25, indicated, facility staff would recognize early warning signs of crisis (notice changes in behavior, mood, or thinking). The P&P indicated staff would provide early intervention (action and support provided to the resident from staff) when a resident exhibited an increase in behaviors (acting out). A review of the Certified Nurse Assistant [CNA] Job Description, updated 10/30/25, indicated, the CNA would report all changes, including agitation (feeling anxious, worked up, or irritable) to the Shift Coordinator (SC) immediately. A review of Resident 1's admission Record, dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-09 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to report an allegation of sexual abuse to the California Department of Public Health (CDPH, state agency dedicated to protecting and improving the health of Californians), the police department, and to the local Ombudsman [a person who worked to maintain resident rights] for one out of two sampled residents (Resident 3) when Resident 3 made statements about being sexually abused. This had the potential to negatively impact health status and psychosocial well-being. Findings: A review of the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Client Abuse Prevention, updated 10/14/24, indicated, Staff will immediately and directly report to the Administrator any suspicions of client abuse, either witnessed or suspected. The P&P indicated, Due to the complexity of the clients being served by this facility (i.e., the seriously mentally ill), all reports of abuse will be initially screened by the Administrator or designee for the possibility of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-04 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to store food in accordance with professional standards when they failed to label and date food product bags after opening the bags for use. The open, unlabeled, and undated product bags contained frozen soy chicken patties, frozen fried eggs, and frozen soy beef patties. This failure had the potential for the food products to be used for meals in an untimely manner leading to bacterial or fungal growth resulting in food borne illnesses amongst residents. Findings: During a review of the facility's policy and procedure titled, Labeling and Dating of Foods, dated 2020, indicated, Newly opened food items will need to be closed and labeled with an open date and used by the date that follows guidelines . During a concurrent observation and interview on 6/1/25 at 2:30 pm, with Food Service Supervisor (FSS), in the kitchen at the second freezer, a package of frozen fried eggs, a package of frozen soy chicken patties, and a package of frozen soy beef patties were observed open and unlabeled. FSS confirmed the bags were…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-04 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that one of 25 sampled Residents (Resident 56) was protected from verbal and physical abuse when Resident 38 yelled at Resident 56 calling him names and hit Resident 56 with a closed fist to his head, then continued to chase Resident 56 down the hall until staff could intervene. This failure resulted in increased anxiety, and the potential to result in emotional stress, anger, depression, feelings of neglect, and the potential for negative clinical outcomes for Resident 56. Findings: A review of the facility's policy revised 10/2024, titled, Client Abuse Prevention, indicated this facility will take all appropriate preventative measures to ensure that clients are not at risk for abuse. All Clients will be afforded the right to be free from verbal, sexual, physical, and mental abuse, corporal punishment, involuntary seclusion, mistreatment, and misappropriation of client property. During a review of Resident 38's medical record, the Admisison…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-02 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the safety and security for one of two clients (Client 1) when: 1. The facility security door locking system malfunctioned and Client 1 eloped from the facility. 2. The Temporary-Office Assistant (TOA) did not recognize Client 1 as a client, when she passed through the front lobby and eloped out the front doors. 3. Program Staff (PS, an employee that does activities with clients), saw Client 1 outside the facility and made no inquiries as to why Client 1 was outside. This disregard for client safety allowed Client 1 to go missing from the facility and her whereabouts were unknown for 8 hours, which put Client 1 at risk for injury and exposure to cold weather and had the potential to negatively impact on Client 1's health, safety, and welfare. Findings: A review of the facility's policy titled, AWOL (absent without leave) updated 9/23/24, indicated, If a client goes absent without leave (AWOL), the proper authorities will be…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-20 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — pattern
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that two of 20 sampled residents (Residents 3 and 82) were protected from physical abuse when: 1. On 6/12/24, Resident 84 struck Resident 82 in the face. 2. On 5/22/24, Resident 84 placed their hands around Resident 3's throat. This failure resulted in bleeding injuries to Resident 82, and had the potential to threaten the physical, emotional and psychological health and well-being of both residents. Findings: A facility policy, titled, Client (resident) Abuse Prevention, updated 4/5/22, was reviewed. The policy indicated clients should not have been subjected to verbal or physical abuse of any kind and clients should not have disciplined other clients. During pre-admission screening, all clients would have been assessed for history of poor impulse control, combativeness and assault to self and others. The interdisciplinary team (IDT-a group of professionals from different disciplines that met to discuss the residents' care) would have…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-20 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to store food in accordance with professional standards when they failed to label and date food containers/ product bags of frozen breaded fish, frozen fried eggs, frozen hashbrowns, frozen frenchtoast, pepperoni, and peeled garlic cloves with open dates after the packages were open and the products being used for meals. This failure had the potential to allow food products to sit an inappropriate amount of time after the packaging was open with no dating label adehered leading to bacterial or fungal growth causing food borne illnesses amongst residents if the product was served for meals and not used by an appropriate date following guidelines. Findings: During a review of the facility's policy and procedure titled, Labeling and Dating of Foods, dated 2020, indicated, Newly opened food items will need to be closed and labeled with an open date and used by the date that follows guidelines . During a concurrent observation and interview on 6/17/24 at 11:18 am with [NAME] in the kitchen, multiple packages were…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-08 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain medical records that were complete and accurate for two out of two sampled clients (Client 1 and Client 2) when there was not a process in place for updating and maintaining the Personal Property Inventory sheet (PPI, a document that described what personal items a client had at the facility). This failure had the potential to inaccurately capture client personal property which could cause frustration for clients. Findings: During a review of the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Medical Records, updated 10/13/03, indicated, Clients' health records are current and kept in detail consistent with good medical and professional practice During an interview on 9/8/23 at 10:46 am, Client 1 stated when he had been admitted to the facility, he had an Xbox (video game system) and two cell phones that had been listed on his PPI. Client 1 stated he had previously sold the Xbox and was upset because the PPI was inaccurate and indicated he had an Xbox when he did not. During a concurrent interview and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-04-07 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility did not report a Clients allegation of rape to the California Department of Health as required. By not reporting the allegation of rape the facility created the possibility for ongoing abuse of the Client potentially causing mental anguish and physical injuries leading to adverse clinical outcomes. Findings: On 4/5/22 at 10:45 AM Client 50's medical record was reviewed. Client 50 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis that includes Schizoaffective Disorder, Bipolar Type (mental illness). On 2/24/2022 Client 50 reported to her Conservator (RP) (person that makes medical decisions) that she had been violated. The medical record does not reflect the facilities required reporting to the California Department of Public Health (CDPH) was completed. On 4/5/22 at 02:30 PM during an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) regarding the rape allegation the DON stated, We found out about it when the police showed up. She has reported rape in the past.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-04-07 · tag F0635 — isolated
    Provide doctor's orders for the resident's immediate care at the time the resident was admitted.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that one of one sampled residents had complete admission orders when Resident 185 had a urinary catheter (a tube that drains urine from the bladder) and there were no Physician's Orders that included the use of a catheter. This had the potential for Resident 185 not to receive the necessary care he needed to prevent malfunctioning of the catheter and avoid bladder infections. Findings: Resident 185 was admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. His diagnoses included; disorganized schizophrenia (disorganized behavior and speech and a disturbance in emotional expression), severe chronic kidney disease (kidneys do not filter waste from the blood), a neurogenic bladder (inability to drain the bladder) and bladder cancer. His most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS a standardized assessment tool used by all skilled nursing facilities), dated 1/4/22, showed that he was alert and oriented and used a urinary catheter. On 4/5/22 at 9:30am,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-04-07 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that 1 of 22 sampled residents had Baseline Care Plans developed within 48 hours after admission. (Resident 185) This failure to identify Resident 185's immediate basic health and safety needs had the potential to negatively impact his physical and psychosocial well-being. Findings: Resident 185 was admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. His diagnoses included; disorganized schizophrenia (disorganized behavior and speech and a disturbance in emotional expression), severe chronic kidney disease (kidneys do not filter waste from the blood), a neurogenic bladder (inability to drain the bladder) and bladder cancer. His most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS, a standardized assessment used by all skilled nursing facilities), dated 1/4/22, showed that he was alert and oriented, had a urinary catheter and was taking psychotropic (alters mood and behavior) medications. On 4/5/22 at 11am, during an observation and interview, Resident 185…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-04-07 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to develop comprehensive care plans for 3 of 22 sampled residents (Residents 185, 75 and 81) when: 1. Resident 185 had one care plan developed for his isolation problem but no other problems were identified or care planned. 2. Resident 75 did not have a care plan developed for his need to be straight cathed (insertion of a tube in the bladder to remove urine intermittently as needed, instead of having a permanent catheter in the bladder). 3. Resident 81's care plans did not identify medications, symptoms to monitor or report, or any non-pharmacological interventions. These failures had the potential for these Resident's needs to go unrecognized and untreated and negatively impact their ability to attain or maintain their highest practicable level of physical and emotional well-being. Findings: 1. Resident 185 was admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. His diagnoses included; disorganized schizophrenia (disorganized behavior and speech…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-04-07 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a post fall injury, including a bump on the head, was monitored according to facility policy, and a fall assessment done, upon readmission, was completed accurately, for one of two residents (Resident 48), with a history of falls. This had the potential to result in a delay in the recognition of a worsening injury and result in more falls with major injuries. Findings: The facility's Fall Prevention & Management policy, dated 4/3/20, was reviewed. It indicated, Upon admission, each resident is assessed using a Fall Risk Assessment Tool to determine possible risk for sustaining a fall. The procedure for responding to a fall included, Resident is to be placed on observation of vital signs, pain and other post-fall complications. Fall details, assessment findings, interventions & notifications are to be documented in the resident's clinical record & care plan updated accordingly. Continued monitoring is necessary, as symptoms may present at any…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-04-07 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review: 1. The facility's pharmacy consultant failed to identify drug irregularities which included duplicate therapy (more than one medication for the same purpose without a clear distinction of when one medication should be given over another medication), for one of six sampled residents (Resident 48) whose records were reviewed for unnecessary drugs. Resident 48 had orders, for two as needed (prn) medications, used to treat anxiety or agitation, without any direction from the physician, as to which medication to use first or why both medications were needed, on a prn basis. This had the potential to result in Resident 48 receiving unnecessary drugs with potential adverse side effects. 2. The facility failed to ensure their pharmacy consultant provided documentation for each resident when the medication regimen review was done on a monthly basis. There was nothing in each resident's medical record to indicate that a medication regimen review was done, if there were no drug…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
Ownership Data Not Available

The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

What families pay in CA

Paying with Medicaid

CMS lists this home as Medicaid-certified only — it can accept Medicaid for long-term care, but it is not Medicare-certified, so Medicare will not pay for a short rehabilitation (“skilled nursing”) stay here. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in California
$12,167/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$15,178/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,000/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 05A371. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-06-04, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next