No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Sierra View Homes

1155 E. Springfield Avenue, Reedley, CA 93654 · Non profit - Corporation · 59 certified beds · (559) 638-9226 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (559) 638-9226 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citation — no harm found (F0605) — cited Feb 2026Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)
Insights

This home’s record is mixed — some reassuring signs, some worth asking about.

In its favor
  • a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
Worth asking about
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (29) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 3 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 3 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
Urgent care / clinic
1150 E Washington Ave · (559) 391-3105 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
Walgreens0.5 mi
852 E Manning Ave · (559) 643-0367 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
290 S Sunset Ave · (559) 638-2345 · Call to confirm hours
Park
CF Mueller Park, 100 N East Ave · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
790 E Evening Glow Ave · (559) 638-1543

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 3 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 3 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 2 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased25.5%10.2%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight12.8%4.0%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder5.7%0.8%0.9%worse
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection3.5%1.2%2.0%worse
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms2.7%7.3%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.4%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury1.6%1.6%3.3%typical for the state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened22.6%9.8%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication17.3%13.7%18.9%typical
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine98.2%98.2%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers0.6%4.3%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control34.4%10.2%21.2%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table7.1%12.0%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.6%1.5%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine78.6%93.2%79.4%typical
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission16.0%23.0%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit9.3%11.2%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.402.251.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.171.571.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

36.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 56 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

36.5%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.5%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
40.5%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.16U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.06hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.08hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.02hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 40.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 37 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.16 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 14% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 5% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF36.5%CMS range 25.8–49.751.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024worse than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.5%CMS range 7.0–15.110.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge40.5%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge27.0%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge24.3%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified64.1%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — Newly certified nursing home with less than 12-15 months of data available or the nursing home opened less than 6 months ago, and there were no data to submit or claims for this measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened2.6%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.3%CMS range 4.2–13.57.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.071.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.12
RN hours/ resident / day
0.10
LPN hours/ resident / day
0.37
Aide hours/ resident / day
0.59
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.05
RN hoursweekends
Total nursing turnover
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 59 beds and averages 54.0 residents a day — about 92% occupied, or roughly 5 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 0.59 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.12 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 0.37 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 0.50 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 0.63 on weekdays — 20% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.15 to 0.05 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

14
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-02-11)
3
at the previous standard inspection (2025-04-10)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

29 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 19 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · F2026-02-11 · tag F0801 — widespread
    Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview record review, the facility failed to have a qualified, full-time certified dietary manager (CDM) for oversight of the Food and Nutrition Services.This failure had the potential of compromising the safety and nutritional status of residents through potential transmission of foodborne illnesses (illness that comes from eating contaminated food) and decreased quality of food for 52 of 52 residents who received food from the kitchen and could negatively affect the resident's quality of life and health.Findings:During an interview on 2/5/26 at 3:40 p.m. with Dietary Supervisor (DS) 1, DS 1 stated the CDM was on leave until 4/25. DS 1 stated the Registered Dietician (RD) came to the facility for eight hours a week. DS 1 stated, We [ DS 1 and DS 2] are covering for her [CDM]. DS 1 stated DS 2 was going to school to obtain his CDM certification.During an observation and interview on 2/9/25 at 10:59 a.m. with DS 2, DS 2 stated he was covering the CDM position. DS 2 stated he was responsible for in-services for the kitchen staff. DS 2 stated he was responsible for making…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2026-02-11 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — widespread
    Provide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interviews, and record review the facility failed to ensure Dietary Aide (DA) 1, DA 2 and Maintenance (MAINT) 1 were trained to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition services safely and effectively for 52 of 52 residents when:1.DA 1 did not demonstrate and DA 2 did not verbalize the proper use of a test strip (paper that measures the concentration of quaternary ammonium compounds [chemicals that kills germs on surfaces] for the sanitizing bucket (a container used to store and mix a chemical solution that reduces germs on surfaces).This failure had the potential for improper disinfection of surfaces increasing the risk of cross-contamination (process by which bacteria is transferred from one object or substance to another, with harmful effect) and exposure of foodborne illnesses (a condition where a person becomes sick after consuming contaminated food or beverages. It is caused by the ingestion of harmful microorganisms, such as bacteria, viruses, parasites, or toxins), to all residents.2. MAINT 1 did not verbalize the proper cleaning procedure for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2026-02-11 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe and sanitary food preparation and storage practices were followed for 52 of 52 residents when:1. Two bags of cabbage with a used by dated 2/2/26, a bag of celery with a used by date of 1/30/26 and a bag of daikon with a used by date of 2/2/26 were stored on the shelves next to other produce in the walk-in refrigerator.2. Two cartons of apple cobbler with a received date of 7/22/25 with no used by date were on the top self in a freezer.3. Two packs of unlabeled cooked chicken with no pulled-out date and used by date were on a tray next to the deli ham in refrigerator 3.4. Black and pink substances inside and white substances were found outside the ice machine.5. One staff member stored their lunch bag inside the resident refrigerator.These failures had the potential risk of cross contamination (process by which bacteria is transferred from one object or substance to another, with harmful effect) and exposure of microorganisms (a microscopic organism, especially a bacterium, virus, or fungus) that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-11 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the residents' water pitcher was within reach for five of eight sampled residents (Resident 9, 11, 13, 39 and 55), when the water pitcher was observed to be placed on the residents' dressers and were not accessible to the residents.This failure had the potential to violate Residents 9, 11, 13, 39, and 55's right to respect and dignity by neglecting their basic need for hydration, and undermining their autonomy and their right to person centered dignified care.Findings:During a concurrent observation and interview on 2/4/2026 at 3:35 p.m. in Resident 9's room, Resident 9 was observed dressed and lying in bed with his eyes closed. Resident 9's water pitcher was observed to be on his dresser and was not within Resident 9's reach.During a review of Resident 9's admission Record (AR - a summary of information regarding a patient which includes patient identification, past medical history, insurance status, care providers, family contact…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-11 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — pattern
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to meet professional standards of practice for five of ten sampled residents (Resident 8, Resident 13, Resident 29, Resident 39 and Resident 47) when:1. Resident 39's physician orders for Oxygen (O2- a colorless, odorless and tasteless gas essential for life) therapy was incomplete on 9/23/25.This failure had the potential for Resident 39 to be administered incorrect O2 treatment.2. Resident 39's O2 tank was found empty on 2/5/26, and Resident 39 did not receive O2 therapy as ordered by the physician on 2/5/26.This failure placed Resident 39 at risk for experiencing shortness of breath (SOB) and respiratory distress (difficulty breathing).3. Resident 13 and Resident 47's medication from 2/1/26, 2/2/26, and 2/5/26 were not administered according to physician's orders and were still in the medication cart on 2/6/26.This failure had the potential to negatively impact Resident 13 and Resident 47's health and overall well-being, resulting in a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-02-11 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure medical records were complete and accurately documented in accordance with accepted professional standards of practice for eight of 16 sampled residents (Resident 9, Resident 11, Resident 36, Resident 39, Resident 55, Resident 6, Resident 7, and Resident 38), when Resident 9, Resident 11, Resident 36, Resident 39, Resident 55, Resident 6, Resident 7, and Resident 38's copy of the Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (POLST - a medical order signed by both the patient and medical provider that specifies the types of medical treatment a patient wishes to receive toward the end of life) were incomplete.This failure had the potential for Resident 9, Resident 11, Resident 36, Resident 39, Resident 55, Resident 6, Resident 7, and Resident 38's decisions regarding lifesaving treatment options and end of life wishes to not be honored.Findings 1. During a concurrent observation and interview on [DATE] at 2:56 p.m. in Resident 36's room,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-11 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to establish and maintain an effective infection prevention and control program for three of eight sampled residents (Resident 9, Resident 11, and Resident 49) when:1. Resident 9 was on Droplet Precautions (infection control measures designed to prevent the spread of germs (viruses/bacteria) transmitted through large respiratory droplets created by coughing, sneezing, or talking that usually travel short distances (less than 6 feet) and facility staff did not put on appropriate Personal Protective Equipment (PPE- wearable gear and clothing designed to protect individuals from workplace injuries, illnesses, and infections) when entering Resident 9's room.2. A urinal (a portable, handheld, or bedside container used by patients to receive urine) was seen on Resident 11's dresser close to Resident 11's water pitcher.3. Resident 49's nasal cannula (a lightweight, flexible device used to deliver supplemental oxygen or increased airflow to a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-11 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
    Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure professional standards of practice were in place for unnecessary medications for two of eight sampled residents (Resident 2, and Resident 7), when:1. Pharmacy recommendations to include resident specific symptoms and/or behaviors which should indicate the reason these residents were being treated with the prescribed antipsychotic (a medication that affects brain activities associated with mental processes and behavior used to treat a collection of symptoms that affect your ability to tell what's real and what is not) and psychotropic (a drug or other substance that affects how the brain works and causes changes in mood, awareness, thoughts, feelings, or behavior) medications were not listed in Resident 2 and Resident 7's physician's orders for the medications.This failure had the potential for Resident 2 and Resident 7 to be prescribed unnecessary medications due to no monitoring of the resident specific symptoms and/or behaviors…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-11 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of eight sampled residents (Resident 2), received a Level II Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR - an evaluation for individuals suspected of having a Serious Mental Illness [SMI] or Intellectual/Developmental Disability [I/DD]/Related Condition [RC]- to determine if they needed specialized services, ensuring placement in the least restrictive setting) evaluation by the designated entity to determine if SMI, ID/DD/RC conditions were present when, Resident 2, who had a diagnosis of schizophrenia (a mental illness that affects a person's ability to think, feel, and behave clearly) and had a PASRR Level I screening indicating Resident 2 had no diagnosis of schizophrenia which resulted in a negative Level I result for SMI.This failure resulted in Resident 2 not receiving the required PASRR level II screening which had the potential to result in missed identification of specialized services needed and placed Resident 2 at risk for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-11 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a comprehensive, person-centered care plan (a tailored document summarizing a person's health conditions, care needs, medications, and goals to ensure consistent care and improve quality of life) was developed and implemented for one of five sampled residents (Resident 49), when Resident 49 had an oxygen (a prescribed treatment that provides supplemental oxygen to individuals with low blood oxygen levels) order that started on 4/18/25.This failure had the potential for Resident 49's oxygen needs not be monitored, revised, and met which could cause increase in shortness of breath.Findings:During an observation on 2/4/26 at 3:47 p.m. in Resident 49's room, an oxygen concentrator was next to the bed with the oxygen tubing wrapped on the side rail and nasal cannula (a lightweight, flexible medical device used to deliver supplemental oxygen or increased airflow directly into a patient's nostrils via two small prongs) on the floor.During…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 19 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-11 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow the policy and procedure (P&P) to ensure the care plans (CP) were reviewed and revised for one of eight sampled residents (Resident 39) when:The CP for Resident 39 was not reviewed and revised after Resident 39 had a change in physician's order for oxygen (O2- a colorless, odorless and tasteless gas essential for life) therapy from 2 liters per minute (L/min- a unit of measurement for the flow rate of oxygen) to 4L/min on 9/23/25.Findings:During a concurrent observation and interview on 2/5/2026 at 12:16 p.m., Resident 39 was seen in the hallway in front of her room and sitting in her wheelchair with a nasal cannula (NC- thin plastic tube that delivers oxygen directly into the nose through two small prongs) in her nostrils, and an O2 tank attached to her wheelchair. The O2 tank was set to 4L/min.During a review of Resident 39's admission Record (AR - a summary of information regarding a patient which includes patient identification, past medical history, insurance status, care providers, family contact…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-11 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure services were provided to restore or improve normal bladder function and bowel function to the extent possible for one of eight sampled residents (Resident 6), when Resident 6's bowel and bladder training (a behavioral technique used to help individuals regain control over their bladder and bowel function) for incontinence (lack of voluntary control over urination or defecation) was not implemented.This failure had the potential to place Resident 6 at risk for urinary tract infections (UTI -infection of any part of the urinary system), pressure ulcers (localized, pressure-related damage to the skin and/or underlying tissue usually over a bony prominence), and not maintaining or improving Resident 6's Activities of Daily Living (ADLs- routine tasks/activities such as bathing, dressing and toileting a person performs daily to care for themselves). Findings:During a concurrent observation and interview on 02/04/2026 at 3:16 p.m. in Resident 6's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-11 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to meet state/federal laws and professional standards of practice for labeling and storage of drugs and biologicals (medical products or agricultural agents derived from living organisms such as humans, animals, or microorganisms) for two of eight sampled residents (Resident 11 and Resident 47) when:1. Resident 11's controlled medication (medications that are highly regulated by the government because of the significant risk of abuse and dependence they pose) record sheet did not indicate the Administration Instructions (specific directions, including dosage form, route (e.g., by mouth), and frequency (e.g., 1-tab daily) for use of the medications.This failure placed Resident 11 at risk of being administered the wrong dosage of the medication at the wrong time and the route. 2. Resident 47 was administered a controlled medication on 1/3/26 and the Controlled Drug Record (CDR) was not signed by the licensed nurse (LN) according to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-11 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolated
    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the residents' call light was within reach for three of eight sampled residents (Resident 9, 11, and 55), when:1. Resident 9's call light was on the floor and not within his reach.2. Resident 11 and Resident 55's call lights were on their dressers and not within their reach. These failures had the potential to cause harm to Resident 9, Resident 11, and Resident 55 when these residents were not able to call for assistance with the use of their call lights in the event of an emergency.Findings:1. During an observation on 2/4/2026 at 3:35 p.m. in Resident 9's room, Resident 9 was observed dressed and lying in bed with eyes closed. Resident 9's call light was observed to be on the floor at the head of the bed and was not within Resident 9's reach.During a review of Resident 9's admission Record (AR - a summary of information regarding a patient which includes patient identification, past medical history, insurance status, care…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-04-10 · tag F0644 — pattern
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to refer a resident to the appropriate state-designated authority for a level II preadmission screening and resident review (PASRR) when 2 (Resident #19 and Resident #39) of 2 sampled residents reviewed for PASRR were diagnosed with a new serious mental illness. Findings included: A facility policy titled, PASRR Policy and Procedure, dated 04/04/2023, revealed, The PASRR consists of a Level I Screening, a Level 2 evaluation (if needed), and a determination, The PASRR is divided into two components, the Preadmission Screening (PAS) and the resident review (RR). The PAS process is completed by the hospital prior to an individual discharging to a skilled nursing facility (SNF). A SNF can also complete the PAS process, but only when the individual is being admitted directly from the community. The RR process is completed for current SNF residents, readmissions, or inter-facility transfers when there is a significant change in the individual's physical or mental condition. In the case of an RR, the NF…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-10 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to accurately code the Minimum Data Set (MDS) for 2 (Resident #19 and Resident #38) of 14 sampled residents. Findings included: A facility policy titled, Minimum Data Set, dated 08/17/2015, revealed, To provide an accurate assessment of all residents through clinical competence, observational, interviewing, and critical thinking skills, combined together to develop individualized plan of care for each individual. 1. An admission Record revealed the facility admitted Resident #19 on 03/17/2022. According to the admission Record, the resident had a medical history that included a diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. A significant change in status MDS, with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 04/02/2025, revealed Resident #19 was rarely/never understood. The MDS Coordinator was interviewed on 04/09/2025 at 1:25 PM. The MDS Coordinator stated that it was important for the MDS to be accurate because the MDS reflected the resident's condition. The MDS Coordinator reviewed the MDS for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-10 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive care plan that addressed hospice care for 1 (Resident #38) of 1 sampled resident reviewed for hospice and end of life. Findings included: A facility policy titled, Comprehensive Individualized Resident Care Plan (Activities) Isolation, dated 01/01/2024, indicated Comprehensive Individualized resident care plans provide a past and current history to current issues, illnesses, medication use, and another other factors. An admission Record revealed the facility admitted Resident #38 on 09/22/2023. According to the admission Record, the resident had a medical history that included an anxiety disorder and major depressive disorder. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 02/16/2025, indicated Resident #38 had a Staff Assessment for Mental Status (SAMS) that revealed the resident had modified independence in cognitive skills for daily decision making. The MDS indicated that the resident received hospice care. Resident #38's Care…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-12-15 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain an effective infection prevention and control program when: 1. Two of three sampled Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs) placed clean linen on top of the personal protective equipment (PPE-equipment worn to minimize exposure to illnesses) cart in the hallway while donning (putting on) their PPE. These failures had the potential to cause an outbreak of the COVID-19 virus (a serious contagious respiratory [Lung] infection transmitted from person to person) outbreak (a sudden rise in the number of cases of a disease) throughout the facility. 2. One of three sampled CNAs exited a room marked red zone (rooms with residents testing positive for COVID-19) with PPE on and walked down the hallway. These failures had the potential to spread the COVID-19 virus throughout the hallway. 3. One of three sampled CNAs exited a red zone room and placed her face shield contaminated side down on top of the PPE cart. These failures had the potential to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-12-15 · tag F0887 — widespread
    Educate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to offer 53 of 54 residents the Covid 19 (a disease caused by a virus named SARS-CoV-2) vaccine (an injection that teaches the immune system how to recognize and fight off specific diease or virus) when it became available to them and did not educate residents, or their designated responsible parties (a person, not the resident, who are responsible for that residents care), on the risks and benefits of Covid-19 vaccination (injection into the body to produce protection from a specific disease). This failure resulted in the Covid-19 vaccine not being available to residents and had the potential to put the residents safety at-risk. Findings: During a review of the facility's Residents Covid Vaccination Status- Resident Directory (RCVS), dated 12/11/23, the RCVS indicated 53 out of 54 Residents were unvaccinated in regard to Covid-19. During a review of the facility's [Pharmacy Store]- Screening Questionnaire and Consent (permission from resident) Form (SQ),…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-15 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive resident - centered care plans for 12 of 37 sampled residents (Residents 7, 17, 24, 26, 28, 31, 33, 34, 35, 37, 42 and 43) when Social Service Director (SSD) and Activity Director (AD) did not develop activity care plans for Residents 7, 17, 24, 26, 28, 31, 33, 34, 35 37, 42 and 43 since they were admitted to the facility. These failures resulted in Residents 7, 17, 24, 26, 28, 31, 33, 34, 35, 37, 42 and 43 not having activities they could engage in, which could lead to boredom, loss of interest, inactivity, depression, feelings of isolation, decreased socialization opportunities with others, and loss of control over their lives while residing at the facility. Findings: During a review of Resident 7's Record of admission (ROA, (a document with patient information, past medical history, allergies, insurance status or other pertinent information) dated 12/13/23, the ROA indicated Resident 7 was admitted to the facility on [DATE],…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-15 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — pattern
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide services which met professional standards of quality of care for four of ten sampled residents (Resident 3, 28, 353 and 23) when: 1. The oxygen (a colorless, odorless, tasteless gas essential to living organism) flow rate (the amount of oxygen being delivered to the body) for Resident 3, 28 and 353 was not administered according to the physician order (an order given for a specific patient/resident by a healthcare provider. This failure resulted in Resident 3, 28 and 353 to not receive the ordered amount of oxygen via the oxygen concentrator (a machine that pulls in the air around you), which could lead to breathing problems that include shortness of breath, headache, and confusion. 2. The nasal cannula and humidifier for Resident 3 had the incorrect date and the nasal cannula and humidifier for Resident 28 and Resident 353 were undated. These failures placed Resident 3, 28 and 353 at risk for respiratory infection which could lead…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-12-15 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — pattern
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide on-going activities program to support residents in their choice of activities for 11 of 14 sampled residents (Residents' 17, 26, 28, 31, 33, 34, 35, 37, 42, 43 and 48) when Residents' 17, 26, 28, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 37 and 43 were not provided individual and independent activities designed to meet their interests since facility started quarantine (staying away from others for a period of time in order to prevent the spread of the disease) on 12/7/23 due to COVID (disease caused by a virus named SARS-CoV-2. It can be very contagious[spread easily] and spreads quickly) positive test results of several staff and residents. These failures resulted in Residents' 17, 26, 28, 31, 33, 34, 35, 37, 42, 43 and 48's inactivity (lack of activity) which could potentially affect their physical, mental and psychosocial well-being. Findings: During a review of Resident 17's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a federally mandated process for clinical…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-12-15 · tag F0732 — pattern
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the nurse staffing information was posted on a daily basis at the beginning of each shift from 11/06/23 to 12/12/23. This failure resulted in facility staffing information not readily accessible to residents and visitors. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 12/12/23 at 3:15 p.m., with licensed vocational nurse (LVN) 3 and Medical Records Director (MRD), in the East wing near the nursing station across the activity room, there was a nursing staff information posted dated 11/05/23. LVN 3 stated the night shift nurse was responsible in completing the form and made sure there was one posted everyday. The MRD stated it was the responsibility of the Director of Nursing (DON) to make sure the posted Census and Nursing Home per Patient Day (NHPPD) form was up to date. The MRD stated, . There was probably an error of the date, but the number of census was also not correct . The MRD stated she was not familiar with the form and was not sure why the form was not up to date. The MRD stated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-12-15 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to have an adequate system in place for receipt and periodic reconciliation that would determine an account of all controlled drugs received in the facility. These failures increased the potential for all residents' controlled substances to be diverted. Findings: During an observation on 12/12/23 at 9:25 a.m. with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 3, the medication cart for west wing was observed to contain two medications; one for Resident 38 for Lorazepam (medication used to treat anxiety) 0.5 miligrams (mg) tablet with 19 tablets remaining and one for Resident 44 for hydrocodone/APAP (controlled medication for pain) 5-325 mg tablet with 9 tablets remaining. During a review of Resident 38's Controlled Drug Record sheet, dated 4/11/23, the sheet indicated, . Lorazepam Tab 0.5 mg take one tablet by mouth every 6 hours as needed, Quantity 30 tablets . During a review of Resident 44's, Controlled Drug Record Sheet, dated 11/8/2023, the sheet…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-12-15 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — pattern
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure three out of three sampled residents (Resident 38, Resident 26, and Resident 44) were safely administered and appropriately prescribed antipsychotic medications when: 1. For Resident 38, the facility did not determine appropriate indication for use prior to administration of Quetiapine (an antipsychotic medication for mental illness), did not implement resident specific non-pharmacological interventions for the use of Quetiapine), did not adequately monitor behaviors for the use of Quetiapine, did not adequately monitor side effect and laboratory monitoring for the use of Quetiapine and did not complete an Abnormal Involuntary Movement Screening (AIMS- screen to assess abnormal movements that may occur as a result of patients taking antipsychotic medications). 2. For Resident 26, the facility did not develop and implement resident specific non-pharmacological interventions for the use of Quetiapine, did not adequately monitor side…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-15 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility were labeled and stored in accordance with currently accepted professional principles, for six out of six sampled residents (Resident 4, Resident 254, Resident 10, Resident 38, Resident 40 and Resident 253) when: 1. Discontinued medications for Resident 4, Resident 254, Resident 10 and Resident 253 were found stored in the medication cart with with currently used medications. This failure placed Residents 4, 254, 10, and 253 at risk for receiving unecessary and potentially expired medications that could cause the residents to experience symptoms of adverse side-effects or drug interactions such as nausea, vomiting, loose stools, and drowsiness. 2. Licensed Nurses (LN) did not apply discard by date labels and resident names on inhaler medications for Resident 38 and Resident 40. This failure could result in Resident 38 and Resident 40 to receive potentially expired and ineffective breathing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-15 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident were treated with dignity and respect for two of four sampled residents (Residents 40 and 7) when: 1. Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 3 did not close the privacy curtain and administered medication to Resident 40 in front of other residents and visible to staff and visitors walking by in the hallway. This failure resulted in Resident 40's stomach to be exposed and viewed by other residents, staff, and visitors and violated Resident 40's right to privacy and dignity. 2. Resident 7 was served lunch tray and was seated at the edge of the bed, Resident 7 was almost laying in bed and not able to sit up straight to see her food placed on top of over the bed table and feed self. This failure had the potential for Resident 7 to not consume enough food which could lead to weight loss and also put her at risk for choking and aspiration which could lead to serious medical condition. Findings: 1. During a concurrent observation and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-15 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a clean and homelike environment for two of seven residents (Residents 4 and 44), when three privacy curtains in room [ROOM NUMBER] were found with scattered brownish red discoloration. This failure resulted in violation of resident's right to live in a clean and homelike environment. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 12/11/23 at 12:20 p.m. with Resident 4 in room [ROOM NUMBER], the privacy curtains separating beds A, B and C were observed with scattered brownish red discolored areas. Resident 4 stated, . The stains in the curtains are blood and had been there for a long time . One privacy curtain between A and B bed was also observed with a large tear. During a review of Resident 4's Record Of Admission dated 12/12/23, the Record of Admission indicated Resident 4 was admitted in the facility on 11/6/23, with diagnoses which included, myocardial infarction (blood clots that blocks blood flow to the heart)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-15 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of five sampled residents (Resident 21) received an influenza (flu-a contagious respiratory infection which can be deadly in high-risk groups) vaccination for the 2023-2024 flu season (from October 1st-March 31st). This failure placed Resident 21 at risk of becoming infected with influenza. Findings: During a review of the Record of Admission, (ROA) undated, the ROA indicated Resident 21 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included encounter for palliative care (specialized care for a serious illness), pleural effusion (buildup of fluid around the lungs) and Alzheimer's Disease (progressive disease affecting memory, thinking and behavior). During a concurrent interview and record review on 12/12/23 at 9:47 a.m. with the Infection Preventionist (IP), Resident 21's flu consent was reviewed. The consent was signed by Resident 21's responsible party on 8/22/23. The flu consent had a handwritten note on the bottom of the form which…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
GENNA, VITOIndividualDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE DIRECTOR; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/13/2006
LINSCHEID, ROBERTAIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/01/2020
ZULIM, REBECCAIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2022
BOHN, STELLAIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 02/25/2025
BOLDT, DAVIDIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 02/25/2025
BRITTELL, LOISIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 02/25/2025
DERKSEN, WILFREDIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 02/28/2023
EWY, ANDREWIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 02/25/2025
LINSCHEID, DONIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 02/28/2023
MILTON, JOSHUAIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 02/25/2020
SMITH, GORDONIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 02/27/2024
UNRUH, MARIANNEIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 02/26/2024

CMS files one row per role, so the 17 rows in the source record cover these 12 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$7.8M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-49.6%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 65%Medicare 6%Other / private 28%

A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$554per resident / day
operating cost
$16,835per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$370per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in California
$12,167/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$15,178/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,000/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 056279. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-02-11, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next