No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Eisenberg Village

18855 Victory Bl, Reseda, CA 91335 · Non profit - Corporation · 166 certified beds · (818) 774-3000 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (818) 774-3000 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citation — no harm found (F0605) — cited Feb 2026Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)
Insights

This home’s record is mixed — some reassuring signs, some worth asking about.

In its favor
  • a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
  • lower-than-typical staff turnover (17% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
Worth asking about
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (35) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

3/5
CMS overall
3 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 3 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 4 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
Urgent care / clinic
6542 Baird Ave
Pharmacy
18515 Victory Blvd · (818) 600-8283 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
6114 Reseda Blvd · (818) 578-5360 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Kittridge St &, Archwood St · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
18730 Erwin St

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 4 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating4★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased12.1%10.2%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight1.0%4.0%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.8%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%1.2%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms0.0%7.3%6.5%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.4%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury2.3%1.6%3.3%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened11.9%9.8%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication20.9%13.7%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%98.2%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers1.5%4.3%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control23.5%10.2%21.2%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table17.0%12.0%17.1%typical
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission19.7%23.0%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit22.6%11.2%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.922.251.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days2.071.571.80worse

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

12.0%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
0.20U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.15hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.04hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.20 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 21% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 0% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF12.0%CMS range 7.6–17.310.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — Newly certified nursing home with less than 12-15 months of data available or the nursing home opened less than 6 months ago, and there were no data to submit or claims for this measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened7.4%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization8.6%CMS range 5.1–16.57.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.301.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.43
RN hours/ resident / day
1.20
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.97
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.60
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.31
RN hoursweekends
16.7%
Total nursing turnover
22.2%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 166 beds and averages 82.7 residents a day — about 50% occupied, or roughly 83 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.60 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.43 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.97 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.25 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.75 on weekdays — 10% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.48 to 0.31 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 17% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

12
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-02-26)
12
at the previous standard inspection (2024-12-05)

Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

35 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 25 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · E2026-02-26 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — pattern
    Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to monitor a resident's orthostatic blood pressure (taking blood pressure measurements taken to detect a significant drop in blood pressure when moving from lying/sitting to standing) who was prescribed an antipsychotic medication (a medication used to treat psychosis [a mental condition in which thought and emotions are so affected that contact is lost with external reality]) for 2 (Resident 3 and Resident 10) out of five residents investigated for unnecessary medications. This had the potential for Resident 3 and Resident 10 to have orthostatic hypotension (sudden, severe drop in blood pressure upon standing) side effects such as lightheadedness, syncope (fainting), placing Resident 10 at risk for fall. Findings: a. During a review of Resident 3's Face Sheet (the front page of the chart that contains a summary of basic information about the resident), the Face Sheet indicated the facility originally admitted Resident 3 on 2/18/2019, and was re-admitted…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-02-26 · tag F0636 — pattern
    Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure 7 of 7 sampled residents (38, 56, 57, 58, 64, 82, 84) had the Care Area Assessment (CAA) completed within the timeframe outlined on the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI - a mandatory assessment tool used for the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS)). This failure had the potential to result in inadequate, non-individualized care plans, missed identification of resident risks, and potential for decline in health. Findings: a. During a review of Resident 38's Face Sheet, the Face Sheet indicated the facility admitted Resident 38 on 1/25/2024 with diagnoses that included but not limited to: sepsis (a life-threatening blood infection), metabolic encephalopathy (a brain dysfunction that can cause confusion), dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities), and hypertension (elevated blood pressure). During a review of Resident 38's Minimum Data Set (MDS-a comprehensive assessment and screening tool) dated 1/19/2026, the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-02-26 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — pattern
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's pain was assessed and documented on the Medication Administration Record (MAR, a daily documentation record used by a licensed nurse to document medications and treatments given to a resident) before and after pain medication administration for one (Resident 8) of one sampled resident investigated for pain. This deficient practice had the potential to result in ineffective pain management, placing the resident at risk for unrelieved pain. Findings: During a review of Resident 8's Face Sheet (a page with information indicated for a resident such as facility admission date and pertinent diagnoses), the Face Sheet indicated the facility admitted the resident to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included low back pain. During a review of Resident 8's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a federally mandated resident assessment tool), dated 12/18/2025, the MDS indicated Resident 8 was severely impaired in cognition (the process of acquiring…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-26 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to: 1.Ensure the Controlled Drug Record (CDR, accountability record of medications that are considered to have a strong potential for abuse) coincided with the Medication Administration Records (MAR, a daily documentation record used by a licensed nurse to document medications and treatments given to a resident) affecting Resident 8 for one of two medication carts (First Floor Team 2 Medication Cart) inspected. This deficient practice had the potential to result in medication error and/or drug diversion (illegal distribution or abuse of prescription drug). 2. Transcribe a physician's order onto the Medication Administration Record (MAR, a daily documentation record used by a licensed nurse to document medications and treatments given to a resident) resulting in failure to monitor a resident's orthostatic blood pressure (taking blood pressure measurements taken to detect a significant drop in blood pressure when moving from lying/sitting to standing) who…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-26 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to label and store drugs and biologicals in accordance with accepted professional principles when the facility: 1.Failed to ensure an eye drop medication was not used past the expiration date for one (First Floor Team Two Medication Cart) of two medication carts that were inspected during the survey. 2.Failed to ensure the label in the Midodrine (given for hypotension or low blood pressure) bubble pack (a method of organizing medications into individual doses, typically sealed in compartments with protective bubbles) is consistent with the physician`s order for the same medication for one of seven residents (Resident 24) observed during the medication administration task. 3. Failed to ensure prescription labels for four of seven sampled residents (Resident 6, 7, 36, and 78) with medications bearing a black box warning (warning on a medication that represents serious or life-threatening potential side effect associated with the specific…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-26 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to prevent the potential for cross-contamination when: 1.Dry goods (peanuts) were not stored in a sealed container. 2.Canned goods with dents and compromised seals were not inspected or discarded. 3.Residual food debris was not cleaned on vegetable dicers. 4.The disc blade for food processor machine was in disrepair 5.Personal belongings and potential contaminants were kept in are intended for sanitized and clean cookware This deficient practice has the potential to result in harmful bacterial growth that could lead to foodborne illness (a disease caused by consuming food or drinks that are contaminated by germs or toxins) in all medically compromised residents and may also introduce chemical and physical contaminants in food being served to all residents. Findings: 1.During an observation on 2/23/2026 at 8:40 AM in the dry storage area an open cardboard box with no cover contained one clear plastic bag of peanuts that had been punctured and contained the equivalent of approximately half cup of loose individual…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-02-26 · tag F0847 — pattern
    Inform resident or representatives choice to enter into binding arbitration agreement and right to refuse.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the binding arbitration agreement (Arbitration Agreement, a binding agreement by the parties to submit to arbitration all or certain disputes which have arisen or may arise between them in respect of a defined legal relationship, whether contractual or not. The decision is final, can be enforced by a court, and can only be appealed on very narrow grounds) was explained to residents' representatives in a form and manner that he or she understands for 4 (Resident 10, Resident 16, Resident 33, Resident 68) of 4 sampled residents. This had the potential for residents' rights to not be honored. Findings: a. During a review of Resident 10's Face Sheet (the front page of the chart that contains a summary of basic information about the resident), the Face Sheet indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities). During a review of Resident 10's Minimum…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-26 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide care in a manner that maintained a resident`s dignity and respect by failing to ensure a licensed nurse knocked prior to entering a resident`s room for one of seven residents (Resident 24) observed during medication administration task. This deficient practice violated the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and had the potential to affect Resident 24`s sense of self-worth and self-esteem. Findings: During a review of Resident 24's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the facility originally admitted the resident on 11/20/2023 and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnosis including hypotension (abnormally low blood pressure) and dysphagia (difficulty swallowing). During a review of Resident 24's Minimum Data Set (MDS-a standardized assessment and care screening tool) dated 11/13/2025, the MDS indicated the resident had the ability to make self-understood and the ability to understand others. The MDS…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-26 · tag F0577 — isolated
    Allow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to promote resident rights to examine the results of the most recent survey (a survey to determine compliance with state and federal regulations) of the facility by failing to post reports with respect to any surveys, certifications, and complaint investigations made during the three preceding years, and any plan of correction in effect with respect to the facility, in areas of the facility that are prominent and accessible to the public. This deficient practice had the potential to impede residents' rights and can negatively affect residents' psychosocial wellbeing. Findings: During an observation on 2/25/2026 at 2:13 p.m., survey results binder 2 was observed in the corner wall of the second-floor dining room. Survey results binder 2 indicated the facility's last survey was conducted on 3/6/2025. During an observation on 2/25/2026 at 2:16 p.m., survey results binder 1 was observed in the corner wall of the first-floor dining room. Survey results binder 1 indicated the facility's last survey was conducted on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-26 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement a comprehensive care plan that meets the resident's assessed needs for one of seven sampled residents (Resident 3) by failing to ensure orthostatic blood pressure was monitored and implemented in accordance with the physician's order. This deficient practice had the potential to have negatively impact Resident 3's health and safety, as well as the quality of care and services provided to the resident. Findings: During a review of Resident 3's Face Sheet, the Face Sheet indicated Resident 3 the facility originally admitted the resident on 2/18/2019, and re-admitted the resident on 2/11/2026 with diagnoses including syncope (fainting or passing out), dementia (loss of cognitive functioning-thinking, remembering, and reasoning) and chronic kidney disease (CKD-a longstanding disease of the kidneys leading to kidney failure). During review of Resident 3's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a comprehensive standardized assessment and care-screening tool),…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 25 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-26 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of two sampled residents (Resident 24) was free from any significant medication errors by failing to administer Midodrine (a medication that increases blood pressure; used for residents with consistently low blood pressure) within the physician's prescribed parameters (specific instructions or limits set by a physician for how a medications should be given. Parameters may include when to give the medication or when to hold it). This deficient practice had the potential to cause complications such as dizziness, syncope (fainting) and possible hospitalization. Findings: During a review of Resident 24's admission Record, the admission Record, indicated the facility originally admitted the resident on 11/20/2023 and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including hypotension (abnormally low blood pressure) and dysphagia (difficulty swallowing). During a review of Resident 24's Minimum Data Set (MDS-a standardized assessment and care screening…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-26 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — isolated
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement its antibiotic stewardship program (coordinated effort to ensure that antibiotics are prescribed appropriately, only when needed, in the correct dose, and for the right duration) for one of two sampled residents (Resident 26) by failing to ensure the resident's physician was notified when the resident who was prescribed an antibiotic did not meet the criteria for Skin and Soft Tissue infection (SSTI- bacterial, viral, or fungal infections that occur when germs enter breaks in the skin causing pain, swelling, redness, and warmth). This deficient practice had the potential for Resident 26 developing antibiotic resistance (not effective to treat infection) from unnecessary or inappropriate antibiotic use. Findings: During a review of Resident 26's Face Sheet (the front page of the chart that contains a summary of basic information about the resident), the Face Sheet indicated the facility admitted Resident 26 to the facility on [DATE] with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-27 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolated
    Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a resident with a communication board (a device that can help patients communicate with care providers and family using symbols, photos, or illustrations) for one of two sampled residents (Resident 3) whose primary and preferred language was not English. This deficient practice has the potential to prevent the resident from communicating with the staff and had the potential to delay receiving care/treatment the resident needed. Findings: During a review of Resident 3's Face Sheet (admission Record), the Face Sheet indicated the facility originally admitted Resident 3 on 1/25/2024 and readmitted the resident on 10/12/2024 with diagnoses that included unspecified dementia (decline in memory or other thinking skills severe enough to reduce a person's ability to perform everyday activities) with agitation and Alzheimer's disease (a progressive disease that destroys memory and other important mental functions) with late onset. Resident 3's admission Record indicated primary language: Persian (foreign…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-27 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement their facility's policy on wheelchair use by failing to ensure staff locked residents' wheelchair brakes while residents were sitting on their wheelchair for two of three sampled residents (Resident 2 and Resident 3). This deficient practice had the potential to place the residents at increased risk of sustaining an injury. Findings: a. During a review of Resident 2's Face Sheet (admission Record), the Face Sheet indicated the facility originally admitted Resident 2 on 11/6/2023 and readmitted the resident on 7/14/2024 with diagnoses that included unspecified convulsion-seizures (a sudden, uncontrolled electrical disturbance in the brain which can cause uncontrolled jerking, blank stares, and loss of consciousness [the state of being awake and aware of one's surroundings), dementia (decline in memory or other thinking skills severe enough to reduce a person's ability to perform everyday activities) with psychotic (a mental…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-27 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a medication cart was locked while the medication cart was left unattended for one of two sampled medication carts (Medication Cart A). This deficient practice had the potential to result in unauthorized personnel or residents accessing the medications stored in the unlocked medication cart. Findings: During an observation on 2/27/2025 at 11:24 a.m., observed Medication Cart A parked in the nurse's station, unlocked, and unattended. Observed residents and other facility staff walking by the unlocked medication cart. During a concurrent observation and interview on 2/27/2025 at 11:25 a.m., with the Minimum Data Set Nurse (MDSN), observed Medication Cart A parked in the nurse's station. The MDS Nurse confirmed the observation and stated that Medication Cart A was unlocked and unattended. During a concurrent observation and interview on 2/27/2025 at 11:30 a.m., with Licensed Vocational Nurse 1 (LVN 1), observed Medication Cart A parked in the nurse's station. LVN 1 stated that Medication Cart A was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-05 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — pattern
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure two (2) of five (5) sampled residents (Residents 61 and 64) were free from unnecessary use of psychotropic medications (any medication capable of affecting the mind, emotions, and behavior) in accordance with the facility policy and procedure by failing to ensure: 1. Resident 61 had a specific, measurable target behaviors (the specific, undesirable behavior that a medication is intended to reduce or manage) related to the use of Zoloft (medication to treat depression [a persistent feeling of sadness or a lack of interest in outside stimuli]). 2. Resident 64 had a specific, measurable target behaviors related to the use of Seroquel (medication used to treat mental illness). These deficient practices had the potential to place Resident 61 and Resident 64 at risk for significant adverse consequence (unwanted, uncomfortable, or dangerous effects that a drug may have) from the use of unnecessary psychotropic drug, which could result to impairment…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-12-05 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — pattern
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain a medication error rate below 5 percent (%) by having two medication errors out of 32 opportunities contributing to an overall error rate of 6.25 % for one of nine residents (Resident 61) observed during the Medication Administration facility task. These deficient practices resulted in the omission of medications which could have resulted in severe health complications. Findings: During a review of Resident 61's Face Sheet, the Face Sheet indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included diabetes mellitus (high blood sugar), BPH, Parkinson's disease, dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), and presence of a G-Tube (a plastic tube inserted into the stomach to infuse medications for one who has problems swallowing). During a review of Resident 61' s Minimum Data Set (MDS, a resident assessment tool), dated 9/07/2024, the MDS indicated Resident 61 was severely impaired in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-05 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — pattern
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from any significant medication errors for one of nine residents (Resident 61) investigated during the medication administration facility task by failing to: 1. Ensure Registered Nurse 1 (RN 1) administered the medications Sinemet (two medications combined into one medication to treat Parkinson's disease [(a nervous system disorder which leads to movement problems) and terazosin (a medication to treat benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH, a non-cancerous condition that causes the prostate [a gland in the male reproductive system] to enlarge due to an overgrowth of cells), for one (Resident 61) of nine residents observed during the medication pass observation. 2. Ensure Licensed Vocational Nurse 4 (LVN 4) administered finasteride and Sinemet during the 3 p.m. to 11 p.m. shift on 12/03/2024 to Resident 61 These failures had the potential for Resident 61 to experience unwanted adverse effects such as tremors, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-05 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to: 1. Store food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety by failing to: a. Label one container of oatmeal with a use by date label. b. Label one container of powdered sugar with a use by date label. c. Label one container of quinoa with a use by date label. d. Label one container of bulgur with a use by date label. e. Label one container of cream of wheat with a use by date label. f. Label one bag of lemon curd with a use by date label. g. Label one container of chicken with a use by date label. e. Label one container of ground beef with a use by date label. 2. Ensure the chlorine test strips used to check that the sanitizing solution was not expired. These deficient practices had the potential for residents in the facility to be at risk for food borne illness (illness caused by food contamination with bacteria, viruses, parasites, or toxins). Findings: 1. During a concurrent observation and interview on 12/2/24 at 8:00 a.m., with the Dietary Supervisor (DS), observed in the storage…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-12-05 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to: 1. Observe infection control guidelines when Registered Nurse 1 (RN 1) was observed leaving a resident's room during a medication pass observation while still wearing an isolation gown for one (Resident 61) of 12 residents who were on enhanced barrier precautions (EBP-a method of using personal protective equipment [PPE - clothing and equipment that is worn or used to provide protection against hazardous substances and/or environments] to reduce the spread of pathogens between residents in skilled nursing facilities). This deficient practice had the potential to increase the risk of spreading infection to other residents. 2. Ensure Housekeeper 1 (HK 1) used the eye protective personal equipment (PPE-goggles or face shields used to prevent or minimize exposure to respiratory droplets [a small droplet of saliva or mucus that is produced when someone exhales]) while cleaning inside the resident's room for one (Resident 68) out one resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-05 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the physician was notified of a resident's refusal of suprapubic catheter care for one of three sampled residents reviewed under the catheter care area. This deficient practice placed the resident at increased risk for infection. Cross reference F656 Findings: During a review of Resident 55's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the facility admitted the resident on 4/4/2023, with diagnoses including unspecified dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities), retention of urine (a condition in which you are unable to empty all the urine from your bladder), and status post suprapubic catheter placement. During a review of Resident 55's Minimum Data Set (MDS -a resident assessment tool) dated 10/10/2024, the MDS indicated the resident`s cognitive skills (the brain's ability to think, read, learn, remember, reason, express thoughts, and make decisions) for daily decision making was severely impaired (never/rarely made decisions). The MDS indicated that Resident 55 was dependent on staff…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-05 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to: 1. Develop a care plan (a plan of care that summarizes a resident's health conditions, specific care and services facility staff need to provide a resident to promote healing and the prevention of worsening a condition, and current treatments) addressing a resident's refusal to wear a mask while on contact/droplet precautions (steps that healthcare staff take to prevent the spread of germs when a patient has germs that can spread through touching and coughs and sneezes) for one (Resident 40) out of five sampled residents investigated during review of the infection control task. This deficient practice had the potential to delay the provision of necessary care and services to Resident 40. 2. Develop a care plan addressing the resident's refusal of care of his suprapubic indwelling catheter (a flexible plastic tube inserted into the bladder from a small cut in the stomach, that remains in place to provide continuous urinary drainage) and failed to implement a care plan intervention to monitor the resident`s…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-05 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to revise a care plan addressing the removal of indwelling urinary catheter (a flexible tube used to empty the bladder and collect urine in a drainage bag) for one (Resident 22) out of two sampled residents investigated during review of the catheter care area. This deficient practice had the potential to delay the provision of necessary care and services related to the resident's urinary catheter. Findings: During a review of Resident 22's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the facility originally admitted the resident on 1/25/2024 and readmitted the resident on 10/12/2024 with diagnoses including sepsis (a serious condition in which the body responds improperly to an infection where the infection-fighting processes turn on the body, causing the organs to work poorly), and metabolic encephalopathy (a problem in the brain caused by a chemical imbalance in the blood), chronic kidney disease (a condition in which the kidneys are damaged and cannot filter blood well). During a review of Resident 22's Minimum Data…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-05 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolated
    Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was provided a communication device with the language that the resident is able to understand for one of one sample resident (Resident 22) investigated under the communication care area. This deficient practice prevented the resident from communicating with the staff and had the potential to delay the appropriate care or treatment the resident needed. Findings: During a review of Resident 22's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the facility originally admitted the resident on 1/25/2024 and readmitted the resident on 10/12/2024 with diagnoses including sepsis (a serious condition in which the body responds improperly to an infection, where infection-fighting processes turn on the body, causing the organs to work poorly), metabolic encephalopathy (a problem in the brain caused by a chemical imbalance in the blood), and chronic kidney disease (a condition in which the kidneys are damaged and cannot filter blood well). The admission Record indicated Resident 22's preferred language…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-05 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide services that promote the prevention of pressure ulcer (localized damage to the skin and/or underlying tissue usually over a bony prominence) injury for one of three sampled residents (Resident 51) as evidenced by failing to monitor the functionality of the resident's low air loss mattress (LALM-mattress designed to treat and prevent pressure ulcers) to ensure the LALM was working properly. This deficient practice had the potential for Resident 51 to develop a new pressure injury. Findings: During a review of Resident 51's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the facility originally admitted the resident on 10/21/2021, and readmitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including unspecified dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities), attention to gastrostomy (a surgical opening fitted with a device to allow feedings to be administered directly to the stomach common for people with swallowing problems), and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-05 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to act upon a recommendation from the Pharmacy Consultant (PC -a healthcare specialist who provides expert advice on medications and pharmaceutical services, including patient safety) to clarify the behavior manifestation for the use of Seroquel (a psychoactive medication-any medication capable of affecting the mind, emotions, and behavior) for one of five sampled residents (Resident 64) reviewed for unnecessary medication. This deficient practice increased the risk of receiving medication that was not optimal for Resident 64's medical condition and increased the risk of adverse consequences (unwanted, uncomfortable, or dangerous effects that a drug may have) from the medication therapy. Findings: During a review of Resident 64's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the facility admitted the resident on 5/10/2024, with diagnoses including major depressive disorder a persistent feeling of sadness or a lack of interest in outside stimuli), dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities), and psychotic…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-05 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure drugs and biologicals were stored in accordance with accepted professional principles in one of (Second Floor, Medication Cart 2) four medication carts inspected when Resident 10's discontinued medication, amlodipine (a medication to lower blood pressure) was not removed from the medication cart and disposed of. This deficient practice had the potential for Resident 10 to receive this medication which could have lowered the blood pressure below normal limits causing dizziness, and loss of consciousness. Findings: During a review of Resident 10's Face Sheet, the Face Sheet indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included hypertensive heart disease (a group of heart problems that develop over time due to high blood pressure). During a review of Resident 10' s Minimum Data Set (MDS, a resident assessment tool), dated 10/14/2024, the MDS indicated Resident 10 was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-05-31 · tag F0849 — pattern
    Arrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the facility had arranged provisions of hospice (a type of medical care for residents who are in the last stages of life) services by failing to: 1. Ensure hospice staff signed the hospice Interdisciplinary Team Sign-in Sheet upon arriving to the facility for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1). 2. Ensure a hospice Interdisciplinary Team Sign in Sheet was placed in the chart for one of three sampled residents (Resident 3). 3. Ensure the hospice agency provided training programs in hospice care for facility staff per contractual agreement. This deficient practice has the potential to negatively affect Resident 1 and Resident 3's physical comfort, psychosocial (the state of mental, emotional, and social health of an individual) well-being, and has the potential to delay or have a lack of necessary care and services. Findings: 1. A review of Resident 1's Face Sheet indicated the facility originally admitted the resident on 12/2/2013 with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-14 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to: 1. Ensure licensed nurse staff completed reconciliation (a process that validates the controlled substance [medication with a high potential for abuse] amount at the end of a shift is the amount expected) of controlled medications for two of four medication carts (Medication Team 1 Cart and Medication Team 2 Cart) observed during medication storage. 2. Ensure a resident's Controlled Medication Count Sheet (a form that is signed at the time a licensed nurse gives a controlled medication to a resident, in order to account for each medication) was signed at the time a medication was given for one of one sampled resident (Resident 65). These deficient practices had the potential to result in inaccurate reconciliation of controlled medication and placed the facility at risk for the inability to readily identify loss and drug diversion (the illegal distribution of prescription drugs for unintended purposes) of controlled medications. Findings: 1.a. During a concurrent interview and record review on 12/11/2023 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-14 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — pattern
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a blood pressure (the pressure of circulating blood against the walls of blood vessels) was checked prior to administering losartan (medication used to treat high blood pressure [the force of the blood pushing on the blood vessel walls is too high]) that had a hold (do not give) parameter to hold for systolic blood pressure (SBP, measures the force the heart exerts on the walls of the arteries each time it beats) less than (<) 110 mm Hg (millimeters of Mercury, a unit of measure for blood pressure) for one of five sampled residents (Resident 2). This deficient practice had the potential to result in hypotension (low blood pressure) which can result in confusion, dizziness, and fainting and require further treatment including hospitalization. Findings: A review of Resident 2's Face Sheet (admission record) indicated the facility admitted the resident on 6/30/2023, with diagnoses that included hypertensive heart disease (weakening the heart from chronic blood pressure elevation, making it harder to pump blood…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-14 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide dignity and respect when Registered Nurse 1 (RN 1) was observed wearing gloves and standing over two of four sampled residents (Resident 40 and 64) while assisting each resident with feeding. These deficient practices had the potential to affect residents' sense of self-worth and self-esteem. Findings: a. A review of Resident 40's Face Sheet (admission Record) indicated the facility readmitted the resident on 1/20/2020 with diagnoses that included Alzheimer's disease (a brain disorder that slowly destroys memory and thinking skills, and eventually, the ability to carry out the simplest tasks), history of falling, and major depressive disorder (a mental health disorder characterized by persistently depressed mood or loss of interest in activities, causing significant impairment in daily life). A review of Resident 40's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a standardized assessment and care screening tool) dated 11/7/2023, indicated Resident 40…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-14 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a copy of a resident's Advance Directive (a written statement of a person's wishes regarding medical treatment) was kept in the resident's chart and easily retrievable for one of three sampled residents (Resident 64) investigated for advance directive. This deficient practice has the potential to create confusion which could lead to conflict with the resident`s wishes regarding his/her health care. Findings: A review of Resident 64's Face Sheet (admission record) indicated the facility admitted the resident on 12/8/2022 with diagnoses that included Alzheimer's disease (a brain disorder that slowly destroys memory and thinking skills, and eventually, the ability to carry out the simplest tasks), dementia (he loss of cognitive functioning - thinking, remembering, and reasoning - to such an extent that it interferes with a person's daily life and activities), and chronic rhinitis (a reaction occurs that causes nasal congestion, runny nose, sneezing, and itching). A review of Resident 64's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-14 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to monitor a resident's behaviors who was prescribed an antipsychotic medication (a medication used to treat psychosis [a mental disorder characterized by a disconnection from reality]) for one of five sampled residents (Resident 123) investigated for unnecessary medications. This deficient practice had the potential to result in adverse reaction (unwanted undesirable effects related to a medication) or impairment in the resident's mental or physical condition. Findings: A review of Resident 123's Face Sheet (admission record) indicated the facility admitted the resident on 11/29/2023 with diagnoses that included Alzheimer's disease (a progressive disease that destroys memory and other important mental functions), psychosis, depression (mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest), and anxiety (intense, excessive, and persistent worry and fear about everyday situations). A review of Resident 123's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a standardized assessment and care screening tool), dated 12/5/2023,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-14 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure liquids were prepared in a form designed to the meet the needs for one of two sampled residents (Resident 18) observed during the Dining Observation task by failing to ensure nectar thick liquids (a thickening agent is added to liquids for people with difficulty swallowing and at risk for aspiration [accidentally inhaling food or liquid through the vocal cords into the airway]) were prepared and served to the resident. This deficient practice had the potential to result in aspiration pneumonia (an infection of the lungs caused by inhaling saliva, food, or liquids) in Resident 18. Findings: A review of Resident 18's Face Sheet (admission record) indicated the facility admitted the resident on 10/3/2022 and readmitted the resident on 8/15/2023 with diagnoses that included Alzheimer's disease (a type of dementia [general term for loss of memory, language, problem-solving and other thinking abilities that are severe enough to interfere…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · B2023-12-14 · tag F0640 — pattern
    Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS- an assessment and care screening tool) assessment for one of two sampled residents (Resident 51) was transmitted within 14 days after the completion date to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) system. This deficient practice resulted in a delay of resident specific information being sent to CMS for payment and quality measure monitoring. Findings: A review of Resident 51's Face Sheet (admission record) indicated that the facility admitted the resident on 1/31/2022, with diagnoses including dementia (impaired ability to remember, think, or make decisions that interferes with doing everyday activities) and type 2 diabetes mellitus (a chronic condition that affects the way the body processes sugar in the blood). During a concurrent interview and record review on 12/12/2023 at 3:05 p.m. with the MDS Nurse 1 (MDSN 1), reviewed Resident 51's Quarterly MDS dated [DATE]. MDSN 1 stated that Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
EISENBERG VILLAGE OF THE LOS ANGELES JEWISH HOME FOR THE AGINGOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF100%since 07/01/1986
LOS ANGELES JEWISH HOME FOR THE AGINGOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF100%since 07/01/1998
FOGEL, JACQUELINEIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 07/01/2023
FRANKIE, RICHARDIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 07/01/2023
GAINES, FREDIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 07/01/2015
GREEN, WILLIAMIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 08/29/2024
KASHANCHI, ROJEANIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 07/01/2022
ORION, GIDEONIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/01/2017
RICHTER, SUSANIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 08/29/2024
WALDORF, ROBERTIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 07/01/2023
CARLSON, TIMOTHYIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/08/2021
COLT STEIDL, ALYSSAIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/14/2008
LOPEZ, REYNALDOIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/18/2025
RUDITSKY, CRYSTALIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/19/2021
STEPANIANS, LARISSAIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/04/2013
SUROWITZ, DALEIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 10/01/2020
GLASS, KATHLEENIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 08/01/2017
MARCO, NOACHIMIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 11/03/2014
SPRINGER, ILANAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2025
ANDERSON HEALTH INFORMATION SYSTEMS, INC.OrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 11/18/2019
CITI NATIONAL BANKOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 05/31/2011
JHA GERIATRIC SERVICES INCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 09/01/2019
MED-PLUS PHARMACY LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 07/01/2018
MOSS ADAMS LLPOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 03/14/2012
P&M HOLDING GROUP LLPOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 11/09/2022

CMS files one row per role, so the 46 rows in the source record cover these 25 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

8 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$15.9M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-47.8%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses

A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$392per resident / day
operating cost
$11,914per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$265per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in California
$12,167/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$15,178/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,000/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 055013. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-02-26, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next