Richmond Post Acute Care

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

68.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 83 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 75.8% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 33 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

No payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours are on file for this home — and the record suggests that is because it did not report them. CMS rates its staffing 1 of 5, which is the rating CMS assigns when a home does not report. Every Medicare-certified nursing home is required to submit its actual payroll data quarterly, and that submission is what makes staffing numbers auditable rather than a claim. A home that does not file is not the same as a home with no data yet: ask this home directly what its nurse-to-resident ratios and weekend RN coverage are, why its payroll data is not filed, and weigh the independent health-inspection score heavily in the meantime.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

22 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 12 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · E2025-01-16 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to allow four residents (Residents 15, 5, 9, and 13) to exercise their rights to self-determination when: 1. One out of 27 residents (Resident 15) was not provided nutrition in accordance with their preferences. 2. Three of six residents (Resident 5, 9, and 13) who followed the facility's smoking policy were not allowed to continue from smoking. These failures had the potential to result in Residents 15, 5, 9 and 13 feeling upset and disrespected. Findings: 1.During a review of Resident 15's admission Record, printed 1/16/25, the record indicated Resident 15 was admitted to the facility in January 2024 with a diagnosis of difficulty in walking. During a review of Resident 15's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS, is a scoring system used to determine the resident's cognitive status regarding attention, orientation, and ability to register and recall information. A BIMS score of thirteen to fifteen is an indication of intact cognitive status.), dated 1/10/25, the record indicated Resident 15's BIMS score was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-01-16 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure two out of three sampled residents (Resident 22 and Resident 77), participated in their care planning process. This failure had the potential for Residents 22 and 77 to receive inappropriate interventions and care that was not aligned with their choices. Findings: During a review of Resident 22's admission Record, printed on 1/16/25, the record indicated, Resident 22 was admitted to the facility in December 2024 with a diagnosis of muscle weakness. During a review of Resident 22's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS, is a scoring system used to determine the resident's cognitive status in regard to attention, orientation, and ability to register and recall information., dated 12/10/24, the record indicated, Resident 22's BIMS score was 15.( A BIMS score of thirteen to fifteen is an indication of intact cognitive status). During an interview on 1/16/25, at 11:21 a.m., with Resident 22, Resident 22 stated they have not had a care conference or had a chance to participate in their care planning. Resident 22 stated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-01-16 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — pattern
  Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure two of two sampled residents (Resident 4 and Resident 22), were free from unnecessary medications when: 1. Resident 4's antibiotic (treats bacterial infection) order of Levaquin oral tablet 250 milligrams (mg) did not have an adequate indication for use. 2. Resident 22's antibiotic order of Ciprofloxacin oral tablet 500mg did not have an adequate indication for use and a stop date. These failures had the potential to result in unnecessary and prolonged use of antibiotic medications, placing Resident 4 and Resident 22 at risk for adverse side effects and health safety issues. Findings: 1. During a record review of Resident 4's admission Record, printed on 1/16/25, the record indicated Resident 4 was admitted to the facility in October 2024 with diagnosis of congested heart failure (a chronic condition in which the heart doesn't pump blood efficiently). During a record review of Resident 4's Order Summary, dated 10/30/24-1/16/25, the record indicated, Resident 4 had a doctor's order of Levaquin oral tablet 250mg, Give…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-16 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe medication storage and labeling practices for a census of 28 when: 1. The medication refrigerator contained five bags of Resident 9's expired and discontinued intravenous (IV, administered directly into the vein) medications. 2. An unlabeled, undated, and unsecured prefilled pen (an injection device that delivers preloaded medication) of Ozempic (Diabetes medicine) was stored in the refrigerator. 3. An expired insulin pen (Diabetes medicine) was stored in an active storage area of the medication cart. 4) An unopened insulin pen with pharmacy label of refrigerate until opened was stored at room temperature in the medication cart. 5) The medication cart contained a discharged resident's bottle of Nitroglycerin medication (medicine to treat and prevent chest pain). 6) Resident 127's Triamcinolone ointment (treats skin conditions such as eczema, rash, allergies, etc.) and Resident 13's Terbinafine hydrochloride cream (treats…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-16 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food was stored under safe and sanitary conditions when: 1. Refrigerated and frozen food items were stored beyond their use by date. 2. Refrigerated and frozen resident food items were unlabeled and undated. 3. Staff food items were stored in the Resident refrigerator with resident food items. These failures had the potential to put 27 residents residing at the facility at risk for food borne illness and cross-contamination (transfer of bacteria or other microorganisms from one substance to another) that could have resulted in infection or spread of infection. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 1/13/25 at 9:43 a.m. with cook 1, (CK 1), the refrigerator and freezer were observed. The refrigerator had a container of olives with a use by date of 1/7/25 and a container of sweet potatoes with a use by date 1/12/25. The freezer had a pack of garden burgers with a use by date of 1/11/25. CK 1 stated their policy was to throw out any food that was beyond their use by date because they…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-01-16 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement infection control practices for four of four sampled residents (Resident 9, 3, 129, and 22) when the blood pressure (BP) cuff and medication tray were not cleaned and sanitized after each use. These deficient practices had the potential spread of infection among residents at the facility. Findings: During a medication pass observation on 1/14/25 at 7:23 a.m. with Registered Nurse (RN) 2, RN 2 was observed passing Resident 9's medications using the medication tray. RN 2 placed the medication tray on top of Resident 9's tray table. RN 2 was then observed checking Resident 9's BP on the left wrist using an automatic BP cuff. After RN 2 checked Resident 9's BP and administered the medications, RN 2 returned to the medication cart. RN 2 did not disinfect the medication tray and the BP cuff she used for Resident 9. RN 2 placed the BP cuff inside the drawer and the medication tray on top of the medication cart. During a subsequent medication pass observation on 1/14/25 at 8:04 a.m. with RN 2, RN 2 was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-16 · tag F0912 — pattern
  Provide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and record review, the facility had seven resident rooms (Rooms 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, and 9) with multiple beds that provided less than 80 square feet (sq. ft.) per resident. This deficient practice had the potential to result in inadequate space for the delivery of care to each of the residents in each room and for storage of the residents' belongings. Findings: During random observations of care and services from 1/13/25 to 1/16/25, there was sufficient space for the provision of care for the residents in all rooms. There was no heavy equipment kept in the rooms that might interfere with resident's care, and each resident had adequate personal space and privacy. There were no complaints from residents regarding insufficient space for their belongings. There were no negative consequences attributed to the decreased space and/or safety concerns in the seven identified rooms. During a record review of the Client Accommodations Analysis, dated 1/14/25, the following resident rooms and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-11-30 · tag F0801 — widespread
  Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure there was a full time dietician or certified dietary manager. This failure had the potential to put 32 out of 32 residents at risk for food-borne illnesses (illnesses caused by food contaminated with bacteria, viruses, parasites, and toxins) and/or malnutrition. Findings: During an interview on 11/29/23 at 11:27 a.m., with Registered Dietician (RD), RD stated she works at the facility 30 hours, which is full time. RD stated she is at the facility four days for 8 hours a day. During a record review of Richmond Post-Acute Dietary Work Schedule (undated), the work schedule indicated RD's schedule was Monday through Thursday, from 10 a.m. until 6:30 p.m., a total of 34 scheduled hours. During a review of facility policy and procedure titled Dietary Manager, (undated), indicated that the facility will have an approved CDM, dietary manager, or registered dietician .the position requires full time status. According to the California Code, Health, and Safety Code - HSC § 1265.4: A licensed health facility, shall employ a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-11-30 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food was stored in accordance with professional standard for food service when five packages of frozen pancakes, four packages of frozen waffles, one large sheet tray of frozen meat, and one tray of pre-poured beverages were unlabeled and undated. This failure had the potential to put 32 out of 32 residents at risk for food-borne illnesses leading to hospitalization. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 11/27/23 at 9:07 a.m., in the freezer, with [NAME] 1, five packages of frozen pancakes, four packages of frozen waffles were unlabeled, and one large sheet tray of meat product was unlabeled and undated. During the same concurrent observation and interview, in Refrigerator 1, one tray of pre-poured beverages (22 cups) was unlabeled and undated. [NAME] 1 stated that food needs label and date so staff can use old items first. During an interview on 11/29/23 at 11:27 a.m., with Registered Dietician (RD), RD stated all food should have label and date. During a review of facility's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-11-30 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
  Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to educate and offer a pneumococcal vaccine (an injection to reduce the risk of getting pneumonia; an infection of the lungs) to one resident (Resident 2) out of five sampled residents. This failure had the potential for increased risk to residents eligible for pneumococcal vaccines to contract pneumonia which is preventable through vaccination. Findings: During a review of Resident 2's Health Record, the record indicated Resident 2 was admitted in May 2018. The immunizations tab indicated Resident 2 received a dose of Pneumovax (a type of pneumococcal vaccine, type unspecified) on 10/10/2022. No other type of pneumococcal vaccines were noted. During a concurrent interview and record review on 11/28/23 at 10:37 a.m., with Infection Preventionist (IP), Resident 2's Immunization Record, undated, was reviewed. The Immunization Record indicated Resident 2 was given Pneumovax Dose 1 on 10/10/22. IP stated that she offered pneumococcal vaccines to all residents…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$17,291 in federal fines across 4 penalties.

• $4,587 — penalty dated 2023-09-11
• $4,587 — penalty dated 2023-09-05
• $4,235 — penalty dated 2023-08-28
• $3,882 — penalty dated 2023-08-21

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 19 rows in the source record cover these 8 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $720K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CA