Ridgecrest Regional Transitional Care And Rehabili
1081 North China Lake Boulevard, Ridgecrest, CA 93555 · Non profit - Corporation · 124 certified beds · (760) 446-3551 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
- a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Apr 2024
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0604, F0607) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has 1 actual-harm citation
- a high number of inspection citations overall (45) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $27,716 in federal fines (most recent 2024-03-14)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 3 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 4 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 3 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 3 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 2 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 4 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 12.9% | 10.2% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 9.9% | 4.0% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.6% | 0.8% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 4.7% | 1.2% | 2.0% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 0.0% | 7.3% | 6.5% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.4% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 5.4% | 1.6% | 3.3% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 24.2% | 9.8% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 18.0% | 13.7% | 18.9% | typical |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 97.2% | 98.2% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 5.4% | 4.3% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 19.8% | 10.2% | 21.2% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 14.5% | 12.0% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.0% | 1.5% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 84.2% | 93.2% | 79.4% | typical |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 14.2% | 23.0% | 22.6% | better |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 34.7% | 11.2% | 12.0% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.71 | 2.25 | 1.67 | typical |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 7.33 | 1.57 | 1.80 | worse |
* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
60.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 126 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 13.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 30 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.17 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 16% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 1% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 60.7%CMS range 51.7–67.4 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | better than U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 9.8%CMS range 6.9–13.8 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 13.3% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 10.0% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 3.3% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 94.1% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 5.8%CMS range 2.5–10.4 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.60 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 124 beds and averages 78.3 residents a day — about 63% occupied, or roughly 46 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.41 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.64 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.57 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.65 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.71 on weekdays — 23% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.75 to 0.35 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 45% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
45 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 34 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · G2024-04-08 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to protect one of two sampled residents from abuse (Resident 1) when Resident 2, who had a history of inappropriate behavior, was not adequately supervised. This failure resulted in abuse when Resident 2 touched Resident 1's breasts and perineal area. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's clinical record the Record of admission (ROA), indicated Resident 1 was admitted on [DATE]. The SOAP [Subjective, Objective, Assessment and Plan - method of documentation used by healthcare workers] Note dated 3/14/22 at 11:09 a.m., indicated, Major neurocognitive disorder [decreased mental function and loss of ability to do daily tasks] due to dementia [a group of symptoms affecting memory, thinking and social abilities], R/O [rule out] Alzheimer's disease [a progressive disease that destroys memory and other important mental functions]. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] indicated, Resident 1's Brief Interview for Mental Status…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2026-05-19 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — widespreadKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement their own policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Release of Information, for 88 of 89 residents (Resident 1, Resident 3, Resident 4, Resident 5, Resident 6, Resident 7, Resident 8, Resident 9, Resident 10, Resident 11, Resident 12, Resident 13, Resident 14, Resident 15, Resident 16, Resident 17, Resident 18, Resident 19, Resident 20, Resident 21, Resident 22, Resident 23, Resident 24, Resident 25, Resident 26, Resident 27, Resident 28, Resident 29, Resident 30, Resident 31, Resident 32, Resident 33, Resident 34, Resident 35, Resident 36, Resident 37, Resident 38, Resident 39, Resident 40, Resident 41, Resident 42, Resident 43, Resident 44, Resident 45, Resident 46, Resident 47, Resident 48, Resident 49, Resident 50, Resident 51, Resident 52, Resident 53, Resident 54, Resident 55, Resident 56, Resident 57, Resident 58, Resident 59, Resident 60, Resident 61, Resident 62, Resident 63, Resident 64, Resident 65, Resident 66, Resident 67, Resident 68, Resident 69, Resident 70, Resident 71, Resident 72, Resident 73,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-05-19 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide suprapubic catheter (a soft, flexible tube inserted through the lower part of the belly into the bladder [portion of the body that holds urine] to drain urine into an outside collection bag) care to one of three sampled residents (Resident 1). This failure had the potential to result in infection.Findings:During an observation on 5/19/26 at 11:45 a.m. in Resident 1's room, Resident 1 was observed to have a suprapubic catheter. The tubing was noted to have thick discolored white and yellowish growth/sediment (a buildup of mineral crystals and mucus, typically caused by bacteria. If left untreated, this sediment can form crusts that completely block the catheter, causing painful bladder distention [meaning to be swollen or enlarged], urinary leakage, and dangerous infections) from the insertion point into the lower down to the collection bag. The collection bag was noted to have discolored white to yellow brown type growth and sediment stuck to the sides.During a concurrent observation and interview on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-19 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow their policy and procedure on medication administration for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1). This failure had the potential for medication induced negative health consequences.Findings:During an observation on 5/19/26 at 11:45 a.m. in Resident 1's room, a medication cup was observed on Resident 1's overbed table. The medication cup had nine medications (unable to identify) observed inside.During a review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment (a standardized assessment to evaluate a resident's functional abilities and healthcare needs), dated 5/22/26, under the section titled, Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS - an assessment of cognition [how well a person thinks, remembers, and learns]), the BIMS score was 15 (cognitively intact status).During an interview on 5/19/26 at 11:48 a.m. with Resident 1, Resident 1 stated the medications on his overbed table have been there since between 6:30 a.m. and 8 a.m.During an interview on 5/19/16 at 12:10 p.m. with Licensed Vocational…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-02-26 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow infection control practices for 33 of 33 sampled residents when:1. A Water Management Program (WMP) was not developed and implemented to identify, assess, monitor, and prevent the potential growth of opportunistic waterborne pathogens (germs that grow well in water) in the facility's water system. This failure had the potential to result in serious illness or death of residents, visitors, and staff. 2. Linens and other laundry items were left wet and unattended in washing machines after environmental services staff work shift ended. This had the potential to result in growth of mold (type of fungus), mildew (type of fungus or mold) and bacteria (organisms that can cause infection) and illness of residents, staff, and visitors.Findings: 1. During an interview on 2/25/26 at 9:39 a.m. with Infection Preventionist (IP), IP stated the WMP was overseen by the maintenance department and the hospital. IP stated he did not participate in the WMP for the facility. IP stated he does not participate in the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-26 · tag F0628 — isolatedProvide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a discharge notice was sent to Ombudsman (representatives who assist residents in long-term care facilities with issues related to day-to-day care, health, safety, and personal preferences) for one of two sampled residents (Resident 88). This failure had the potential to result in Resident 88 not having an advocate who could inform them of their admission, transfer, and discharge rights and options.Findings:During a concurrent interview and record review on 2/25/26 at 1:51 p.m. with Minimum Data Set Coordinator (MDSC), Resident 88's admission Record (AR), undated was reviewed. The AR indicated Resident 88 was discharged to home on [DATE]. MDSC stated Resident 88 was discharged home and the Ombudsman was not notified.During a review of the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Transfer or Discharge Notices, dated 2001, the P&P indicated, 4. A copy of the notice is sent to the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman at the same time…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-26 · tag F0644 — isolatedCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to accurately complete the annual Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR-federal requirement to help ensure that individuals are not incorrectly placed in nursing homes or long-term care instead of a psychiatric setting) for one of one sampled resident (Resident 12). This failure had the potential for Resident 12 to be placed in an inappropriate setting and not receive required services. Findings:During a review of Resident 12's Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR -mandatory federal program which requires Residents to be screened for mental illness or intellectual disability/developmental disability) Level 1 Screening, dated 9/24/25, the PASRR indicated, Level I-positive for (SMI) [serious mental illness].During a concurrent interview and record review on 2/26/26 at 2:10 p.m. with Minimum Data Set Coordinator (MDSC), Resident 12's Notice of Attempted Evaluation (NAE-for SNF residents, a new Level I screening must be submitted to restart the process), dated 9/28/25 was reviewed. The NAE indicated,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-26 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the medical record was complete and accurate when physician's verbal order and change in condition physician notification was not documented in the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) for one of six sampled residents (Resident 82). This failure had the potential for Resident 82 to not have his medical needs met which could result in a negative health outcome. Findings:During a review of Resident 82's admission Record (AR), dated 2/25/26, the AR indicated Resident 82 was admitted to the facility on [DATE].During a concurrent interview and record review on 2/24/25 at 3:34 p.m. with Director of Nursing (DON), Resident 82's Physician Order (PO), dated 1/25/26 to 2/24/26 were reviewed. DON stated she was unable to provide documentation of a physician order or notice of a change in condition for Resident 82's transfer to the hospital emergency room on 1/25/26. DON stated it was the expectation of the facility nursing staff to document the physician…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-26 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of five sampled residents' (Resident 66) was free from medication error rate of greater than five percent (%) when two medication errors occurred within 35 opportunities resulting in a 5.51% error rate. This failure had the potential for Resident 66 not receiving the full therapeutic effects of the medication and potential for adverse health outcomes. Findings:During an observation on 2/25/26 at 8:38 a.m. in Resident 66's room, Registered Nurse (RN) 1 administered Resident 66's morning (a.m.) medications. RN 1 stated to Resident 66 she (RN 1) did not have two of her medications to administer, lisinopril (medication to treat high blood pressure) and fluoxetine (medication to treat depression).During an interview on 2/25/26 at 8:39 a.m. with RN 1, RN 1 stated she did not administer Resident 66's lisinopril and fluoxetine because they were not available. RN 1 stated the pharmacy should have been notified regarding the unavailability of the medications and this was not done. During a review of Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-03-06 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a sanitary environment within the foodservice operation and safe food handling when: 1. One of six sampled residents (Resident 34) had three unopened milk cartons left unrefrigerated in her room. This failure had the potential for Resident 34 to consume spoiled milk and develop foodborne illness. 2. Raw pasteurized shell eggs were stored under a pan of covered raw beef inside a walk-in refrigerator. This failure had the potential for cross-contamination and placed residents at an increased risk of foodborne illness. 3. There lacked adequate cleaning schedules, identifying, and reporting of unsanitary conditions in the kitchen by Dietary Manager (DM) and Registered Dietitian (RD) 1 when multiple drains were extensively covered with black, yellow and or white colored substances, an area of pooled water was on the floor near the steamer, accumulation of dust was on the ceiling vents, and there were cracked and/or chipped flooring and rims of the floor drains in various areas throughout the kitchen which…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-03-06 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — widespreadKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure essential equipment was maintained in safe operating condition when: 1. A food preparation sink located in the kitchen had an air gap and floor sink drain in accordance with the Food and Drug Administration Food Code (FDAFC), dated 2022. Facility failure to ensure proper plumbing installation may result in potential health hazards such as cross connections, back siphonage or backflow. These conditions may result in the contamination of food, utensils, equipment, or other food-contact surfaces. (FDAFC, 5-402.11, 2022) 2. Two of two ice-machines located near two different nursing stations had an air gap per the ice-machine's manufacturer's guidelines (MG) and FDAFC, dated 2022. In addition, the ice-machine located near 300 hall nursing station was not stored in a manner that eliminates harborage of pests when there was opened holes/crevices between the baseboard and wall, peeling paint coming off the wall, and the floor was not clean with cracked tiles. Findings: 1. During an observation on 03/04/25 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 34 citations
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-06 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — patternReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to enusre call lights were withing reach for four of 36 sampled residents (Resident 47, Resident 61, Resident 16, Resident 15). This failure had the potential for residents' needs to go unmet and place residents' safety at risk. Findings: During an observation on 3/3/25 at 10:53 a.m. in Resident 47's room, Resident 47 was laying on her back toward her left side and was restless, moving both feet back and forth on the mattress. Resident 47's sensitive call light (a system to be used for limited mobility) was tied to the right upper side rail where she could activate or use call for assistance. During a concurrent observation and interview on 3/3/25 at 10:56 a.m. with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 1, Resident 47's call light was observed tied to the right upper side rail. LVN 1 stated Resident 47 was able to use the round sensitive call light and it should be within her reach. During an observation on 3/3/25 at 1:19 p.m. in Resident 61's room, Resident 61's call light was hanging over the headboard out of reach…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-06 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — patternHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure three of seven sampled residents (Resident 14, Resident 38, and Resident 56) were informed of the process to file a grievance (formal complaint) with the facility. This failure had the potential for residents' concerns to go unaddressed by the facility. Findings: During an interview on 3/4/25 at 10:04 a.m. with Resident 14, Resident 14 stated he did not know how to file a grievance. During a review of Resident 14's Minimum Data Set, (MDS- a federally mandated resident assessment tool) dated 1/17/25, the MDS indicated Resident 14 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS - an assessment tool used by facilities to screen and identify memory, orientation, and judgement status of the resident) score of 13 (score of 13-15 means cognitively intact). During an interview on 3/4/25 at 10:05 a.m. with Resident 38, Resident 38 stated she does not remember if the facility informed her on how to file a grievance. Resident 38 stated she just…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-03-06 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — patternProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed follow their Policy and Procedure (P&P) titled, Staffing, Sufficient and Competent Nursing, for all residents (73) when direct care service hours per patient day for Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs) fell below the minimum standard of 2.4. This failure had the potential for residents care needs not to be met by staff. Findings: During an interview on 3/4/25 at 2:39 p.m. with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 3, LVN 3 stated when staff call off from work, they work short staffed. LVN 3 stated they would divide up the tasks that would have been completed by the staff who called off work. During an interview on 3/6/25 at 9:45 a.m. with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 6, CNA 6 stated she has worked short staffed frequently. During a concurrent interview and record review on 3/6/25 at 11:12 p.m. with Director of Nursing (DON), Census and Direct Care Service Hours Per Patient Day (DHPPD), dated 3/1/25 and 3/2/25 were reviewed. DHPPD indicated on 3/1/25 actual CNA DHPPD was 2.31. A signature indicated the patient census and direct…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-06 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — patternSet up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility's Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) committee failed to identify, develop, and implement infection prevention and control action plans to correct infection control deficient practices identified by the survey team (Reference tags F-880, F-882 and F-945). This failure placed all 73 facility residents at risk for infectious diseases. Findings: During a concurrent interview and record review on 3/6/25 at 11:50 a.m. with the Administrator, the minutes of the facility's Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) (a committee that identifies quality deficits and implements corrective plans) meeting dated 1/23/25 (the most recent QAPI meeting) were reviewed. The Administrator indicated the 1/23/25 QAPI meeting covered the period of October, November, and December 2024. The facility's QAPI meeting minutes dated 1/23/25 were reviewed. The QAPI meeting minutes indicated a one page infection prevention control report titled Quarterly Report Infection Prevention 2024. The Quarterly Report Infection…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-06 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement infection prevention and control practices when: 1. One of six sampled residents (Resident 6) had three opened gallons of distilled water on top of a commode. This failure had the potential for contamination of the distilled water. 2. Treatment Nurse (TN) dropped an item from the treatment cart, picked it up off the floor, and placed it back in the treatment cart. This failure had the potential for contamination of clean items in the treatment cart. 3. Infection Preventionist (IP) did not follow the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Monitoring Compliance with Infection Control for surveillance (monitoring) activities, collecting, analyzing, and tracking and trending of data. This failure had the potential for facility to be unaware of outbreaks and transmission of infectious diseases. 4. Enhanced Barrier Precaution (EBP-a set of infection control measures that use gowns and gloves to reduce the spread of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-03-06 · tag F0945 — failed to train staff on abuse prevention — patternInclude as part of its infection prevention and control program, mandatory training that includes written standards, policies, and procedures for the program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow its Policy and Procedure titled, Employee Training on Infection Control, for 11 of 25 sampled Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVN) (LVN 1, LVN 2, LVN 3, LVN 4, LVN 5, LVN 6, LVN 7, LVN 8, LVN 10, LVN 11, and LVN 12) and four of six sampled Registered Nurses (RN) (RN 1, RN 2, RN 4, and RN 5). This failure resulted in licensed nursing staff being unaware of standard infection prevention precautions, increasing the potential for the spread of infectious diseases to residents, staff, and visitors. Findings: During a concurrent interview and record review on 3/5/25 at 2:39 p.m. with Infection Preventionist (IP) the facility's education titled,Infection Prevention (IP), dated 6/18/24, 6/19/24, 1/24/24, and 1/25/24 was reviewed. The IP education indicated some of the topics that should have been covered during the training included: the six elements of Standard Precautions, the importance of hand hygiene, contact wet time of disinfectants, proper use of personal protective equipment, the difference between cleaning and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-06 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a home-like environment for one of six sampled residents (Resident 72) when the bathroom had an odor. This failure had the potential to cause a decrease in Resident 72 and visitors' comfort level and failed to protect Resident 72's right to a home-like environment. Findings: During a review of Resident 72's admission Record (AR), dated 12/6/25, the AR indicated, Resident 72's admission date was 12/6/25. During a concurrent observation and interview on 3/5/25 at 8:08 a.m. with Resident 72's family member (FM) in Resident 72's room, there was a strong odor of urine in the bathroom. FM stated when the bathroom door is left open, there was a strong stale urine smell. FM stated she had visited Resident 72 every day since he was admitted three weeks ago. During an interview on 3/5/25 at 8:16 a.m. with Resident 72, Resident 72 stated, The bathroom stinks. During a review of Resident 72's Minimum Data Set (MDS- a federally mandated resident assessment tool), dated 2/13/24, the MDS indicated Resident 72 had a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-06 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow its Policy and Procedure, Care Plans [CP], Comprehensive Person-Centered, when care plans were not developed and implemented for two of 38 sampled residents (Resident 32 and Resident 6) with infections. This failure had the potential to result in Resident 32 and Resident 6's individualized care needs to go unmet and negatively affect their health and recovery. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 3/3/25 at 1:01 p.m. with Resident 32 in Resident 32's room, Resident 32 had an intravenous (IV- in the vein) catheter (small flexible tube used to administer medications) in his right wrist. Resident 32's room contained an IV bag labeled with an antibiotic (medication used to treat infections), with tubing attached and an IV infusion pump on a pole next to his bed. Resident 32 stated he had a urinary tract infection (UTI- microscopic organisms living in the urinary tract [bladder, ureters, urethra, or kidneys] causing pain while urinating, pain in the back or side, or needing to urinate often). During…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-06 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of one sampled residents (Resident 31) diet order was clarified per Resident 31's preference for lacto-vegetarian (which include dairy products but not egg products) diet, as orders are a plan of care and communication to the interdisciplinary team, including the physician responsible for the care of Resident 31. Facility failure to clarify the diet order with the physician responsible for prescribing diet orders had the potential for Resident 31's physician to be unaware Resident 31 excluded some foods that may lead to deficits in some nutrients, vitamins and minerals, in order for the doctor to evaluate if further tests or labs may be in order. Findings: During a review of Resident 31's Nutrition Risk Assessment (NRA), dated 7/16/24, the NRA indicated, Food/Cultural/Religious Preferences: Vegetarian diet -dairy ok. No eggs.Interventions; Recommend continue M/S [mechanical soft] diet as ordered.MVI [multivitamin] w/ [with] minerals requested. During a concurrent interview and record review on 03/05/25 at 11:50…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-06 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure two of two sampled residents (Resident 32 and Resident 38) where not at risk for accident and injury when: 1. Resident 32's bathroom grab bar was slippery and grip tape (non-slip cover designed to maximize safety using hand hold surfaces) was not secured to grab bar. This failure had the potential to result in falls with injuries. 2. Resident 38 was left unsupervised while out on a patio and without means to call for assistance. This failure had the potential for Resident 38 to experience harm. Findings: 1. During a concurrent observation and interview on [DATE] at 1:01 p.m. with Resident 32 in Resident 32's room, a tube of silicone cream was on the resident 32's bed. In the bathroom, grab bars were on the left side of the toilet. No grip tape was on the grab bars. Resident 32 demonstrated how his hands slipped on the grab bars. Resident 32 stated his hands are slippery from silicone cream. Resident 32 stated the facility had put…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-06 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to monitor the effectiveness of pain medications for two of two sampled residents (Resident 35 and Resident 55). This failure had the potential for Resident 35 and Resident 55 to experience uncontrolled pain. Findings: During an interview on 3/3/25 at 10:50 a.m. with Resident 35, Resident 35 stated she had uncontrolled pain. During a review of Resident 35's Order History (a record of the resident's current medication orders), undated, the Order History indicated the following order: Dilaudid [a narcotic pain medication] 2 mg to be administered every 6 hours as needed for pain. During an interview on 3/3/25 at 11:32 a.m. with Resident 55, Resident 55 stated she had uncontrolled pain. During a review of Resident 55's Order History, undated, the Order History indicated the following order: Norco [a narcotic pain medication] 5/325 mg [milligrams] to be administered every 6 hours for pain. During a concurrent interview and record review on 3/6/25 at 7:53 a.m. with the DON, Resident 55's medication MAR, for the period 3/4/25 to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-06 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure insulin (a medication to control blood sugar levels) vials were labeled with the resident's name for one of one sampled Resident (Resident 36). This failure had the potential for Residents 36 to receive another resident's insulin. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 3/5/25 at 11:20 a.m. with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 1, during medication pass, LVN 1 was preparing to administer insulin to Resident 36. LVN 1 opened a drawer in the medication cart and removed a box labeled with Resident 36's name and Humulin (insulin used to treat high blood sugar) R ]Regular] 100u/mL [unit/milliunits-units of measure] Solution - Inject before meals LVN 1 opened the box and pulled a vial labeled Humulin REGULAR (Insulin Human) Injection. The vial did not have resident 36's name or other resident identifying information. LVN 1 stated each resident receiving insulin had their own dedicated insulin vial, but the resident's name was placed only on the outside box and not on the vial. During an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-06 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolatedEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure: 1. The planned menu for a therapeutic renal diet (for kidney disease) was followed for one of one sampled resident (Resident 43) when 2 oz. (ounces) of gravy was served instead of 1 oz. of gravy as planned. This failure had the potential for Resident 43 to not have her their individualized nutritional needs met. 2. A Registered Dietitian (RD) developed and prepared a lacto [dairy okay]-vegetarian menu to include an evaluation of nutritional adequacy for one of one sampled resident (Resident 31) with a lacto-vegetarian preference to meet Resident 31's choices and special dietary needs. A planned lacto-vegetarian menu was not prepared in advance to meet Resident 31's ordered textured diet of mechanical soft (M/S-foods that are soft and easy to chew and swallow) ground consistencies which resulted in whole blueberries with the skin on being served which was not allowed on a M/S diet. This failure resulted in Resident 31's special dietary needs to not be met and a variety of menu items to not be provided…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-06 · tag F0882 — isolatedDesignate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the Infection Preventionist (IP) failed to demonstrate competency to carry out the functions of the Infection Prevention and Control Program for the facility when: 1. The IP did not follow the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Monitoring Compliance with Infection Control for surveillance (monitoring) activities, collecting, analyzing, tracking and trending of data. This failure had the potential for facility to be unaware of outbreaks and transmission of infectious diseases. [reference F880] 2. Enhanced Barrier Precaution were not implemented in the facility. This failure had the potential to spread infections to residents, staff, and visitors. [reference F880] Findings: 1. During a concurrent interview and record review on 3/5/25 at 8:53 a.m. with IP, the facility's surveillance activities for infection control were reviewed. IP stated he only monitored hand hygiene which included hand washing and hand rub, and donning on and doffing of Personal…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-29 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of one of four residents (Resident 1) when the facility did not provide a prescribed dose of Insulin Glargine (a medication to control blood sugar) and three prescribed doses of Potassium (a supplement for the prevention of kidney stones - a small, hard deposit that forms in the kidneys and is often painful when passed) for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1). These failures had the potential for Resident 1 to experience adverse health outcomes. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's Physician Orders , dated 1/1/25-1/31/25, the Physician Orders indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], had diagnoses including diabetes mellitus (a condition affecting blood sugar levels). The Physician Orders indicated the following medication orders: a) 1/24/25 (Insulin Glargine) BASAGLAR KWIKPEN.50 units subcutaneous TWICE DAILY AT 0900 & 2200 b) 5/2/24 (Potassium Citrate) POTASSIUM CITRATE…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-18 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolatedHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow its policy and procedure (P&P) on recording and investigating grievances or complaints for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) when Resident 1's grievance reports were not resolved, and Resident 1 was not informed of the findings of the investigation, as well as any corrective actions recommended. This failure had the potential to result in Resident 1 to develop adverse health outcomes from potentially experiencing repeated concerns from unresolved grievances. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's Record of admission (ROA), dated 4/20/23, the ROA indicated, Admitting/Subsequent Diagnoses. Type 2 diabetes mellitus (a disease that occurs when the body does not use insulin [a hormone or medication that lowers blood sugar] properly, resulting in high blood sugar). During an interview on 12/18/24 at 11:14 a.m. with Resident 1, Resident 1 stated she had filed multiple grievances. Resident 1 stated she had not been informed of the findings, and the facility's corrective actions for some of her grievances.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-18 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow its policy and procedure (P&P) on administering medications for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) when Resident 1's two insulin medications were not administered in a timely manner. This failure had the potential to result in Resident 1 to develop adverse health outcomes. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's Record of admission (ROA), dated 4/20/23, the ROA indicated, Admitting/Subsequent Diagnoses. Type 2 diabetes mellitus (a disease that occurs when the body does not use insulin [a hormone or medication that lowers blood sugar] properly, resulting in high blood sugar). During an interview on 12/18/24 at 11:14 a.m. with Resident 1, Resident 1 stated she has been getting her insulin more than an hour too late or too early. Resident 1 stated, It was making me anxious and nervous. I had shortness of breath. I was shaky. During a concurrent interview and record review on 12/18/24 at 2:32 p.m. with Director of Nursing (DON), Resident 1's Medication Administration Record (MAR), dated December 2024 was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-15 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide reasonable accommodations for two of three sampled resident (Resident 1 and Resident 2). This failure had the potential for delay in care. Findings: During an interview on 10/14/24 at 11:37 a.m. with Resident 2, Resident 2 stated call lights take 20 minutes to be answered sometimes. Resident 2 stated the wait time was not acceptable. Resident 2 stated what if there was an emergency. During a review of Resident 2's Minimum Data Set, (MDS - an assessment tool) dated 10/19/24, the MDS indicated, Resident 2's BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score was 15 (a score of 13 to 15 points indicates the resident has cognitive intactness). During an interview on 10/14/24 at 11:37 a.m. with Resident 1, Resident 1 stated the facility had lots of call offs recently. Resident 1 stated one day (no date given) there was an issue where she waited 2 hours in a wet brief. Resident 1 stated, I had to lay in my mess for two hours to be change. Resident 1 stated, Makes you fell less than human. During a review of Resident 1's MDS,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-15 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure medication were administered as ordered for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1). This failure had the potential for Resident 1 to have adverse outcomes. Findings: During an interview on 10/14/24 at 11:37 a.m. with Resident 1, Resident 1 stated she was sent to an appointment out of town (no date given) with an insulin (medication used to treat diabetes [chronic disease that occurs when the body does not produce enough insulin or does not use insulin properly resulting in high blood sugar levels]) pen but no needle. Resident 1 stated she did not receive insulin before lunch recently (no date given). Resident 1 stated she was supposed to get her Ozempic (medication used to treat diabetes) on Friday but did not get it until Saturday. Resident 1 stated Ozempic should be given timely so it will be effective. During an interview on 10/14/24 at 12:46 p.m. with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 1, LVN 1 stated medications can be administered one hour before and one hour after scheduled time frame. During a concurrent…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-14 · tag F0576 — isolatedEnsure residents have reasonable access to and privacy in their use of communication methods.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of three sampled residents (Resident 1), mail was delivered unopened. This failure resulted in violation of Resident 1's resident rights and privacy. Findings: During an interview on 5/14/24 at 10:24 a.m. with Resident 1, Resident 1 stated Administrative Service Manager in Training (ASM) handed her a letter from her insurance company and the letter was addressed to her, with her name on it. Resident 1 stated the letter was opened without an envelope. Resident 1 stated she asked ASM who opened her mail, she stated ASM did not respond. During a review of Resident 1's Interdisciplinary Progress Note, (IDTPN) dated 5/7/24 at 3:46 p.m. the IDTPN indicated, In the office this writer [ASM] had and [insurance] letter for [Resident 1] which was unopened. In order to assist, this writer [ASM] assumed this must be the letter [Resident 1] was talking about as the resident only showered [sic] an email version, and [ASM] opened the letter. During an interview on 5/14/24 at 1:11 p.m. with ASM, ASM stated Resident 1 asked him…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-14 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolatedHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) grievances were resolved. This failure had the potential for negative psychosocial outcomes. Findings: During an interview on 5/14/24 at 10:24 a.m. with Resident 1, Resident 1 she stated she filed grievances, but the facility did not resolve her grievances. During a concurrent interview and record review on 5/14/24 at 3:13 p.m. with Administrative Service Manager in Training (ASM), ASM reviewed Resident 1's Resident/Family Concern/Grievance Report, (RFCGR) dated 4/22/24, 5/1/24. 5/4/24. ASM confirmed RFCGR were not completed (no follow up, no resolution, not signed off by administration, and the forms were not signed by Resident 1 concluding the grievances were resolved). ASM confirmed the findings and stated the resident did not sign the form to prove the grievances had been resolved. During a review of the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Grievances/Complaints, Filing, revised April 2017, the P&P indicated, The administrator and staff will make prompt…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-14 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — isolatedAdminister the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure adequate supplies were available for two of three sampled residents (Resident 1 and Resident 2). This failure had the potential for Resident 1 and Resident 2 to have unmet care needs and discomfort. Findings: During an interview on 5/14/24 at 10:24 a.m. with Resident 1, Resident 1 stated the facility runs out of chux (underpads) and wipes, she stated they (facility) ran out last night. Resident 1 stated it happens usually at night. During an interview on 5/14/24 at 11:13 a.m. with Resident 2, Resident 2 stated the facility run out of large briefs and chux about twice a month. Resident 2 stated when they run out the staff will put a larger brief or a smaller brief on him. Resident 2 stated When the staff puts a larger brief it was not tight enough to hold the liquid in and cause leaks and when the staff puts the smaller one on it is too tight and uncomfortable. Resident 2 stated the facility should not run out briefs are a predictable item, they (facility) should learn for their mistakes. During an interview on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-01 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure care plan was implemented for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) when the behaviors were not monitored hourly. This failure had the potential for Resident 1 to have increased behavioral changes due to unmonitored behaviors and delayed psychosocial interventions. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's SW (Social Worker) Note, dated 4/24/24, the SW Note indicated Resident 1 stated he will kill Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 1. During a review of Resident 1's Care Plan (CP), dated 4/24/24, the CP indicated, Resident verbalized inappropriate statements including threat of life and safety of treatment nurse . Interventions .hourly rounding for location behavior and activity. During a review of Resident 1's Active Orders Report (AOR), dated 4/25/24, the AOR indicated, Hourly Rounding Monitor for location, behavior and activity. Document in comment section every hour. During a review of Resident 1's Administration Order Text (AOT), dated 4/25/24 and 4/26/24, the AOT indicated there were no documentation of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-29 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to monitor efficacy of the bed alarm to ensure it (bed alarm) was functioning for one of four sampled residents (Resident 1). This failure had the potential to result in Resident 1 having an unwitnessed fall and sustaining an injury. Findings: During an observation on 4/8/24 at 7:46 a.m. in Resident 1's room. Resident 1 was lying in bed with her eyes closed. Resident 1 had bilateral half upper side rails up, fall mats on both sides of bed, call light within reach, and room was free of clutter. Resident 1 opened her eyes slightly and then closed them again when being spoken to. Resident 1 did not say anything. During a review of Resident 1's Post Fall Review/Fall Risk Assessment (PFRFRA), dated 3/17/24, the PFRFRA indicated, 3/17/24 at 18:55 [6:55 p.m.] staff were alerted by tx [treatment] nurse [LVN 3]. Upon assessment resident [1] was laying on fall mat on side of bed closet to window; resident [1] was seated on bottom with knees bent. Resident [1] states she fell. Unwitnessed. Outcome: Major Injury. Transverse…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-03-14 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — widespreadSet up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement an action plan in the facility's Quality Assessment and Performance Improvement (QAPI), when the Pharmacist had identified significant medication errors during his monthly Medication Regiment Review (MRR) for 13 of 49 sampled residents (Resident 13, Resident 14, Resident 24, Resident 25, Resident 31, Resident 37, Resident 38, Resident 45, Resident 46, Resident 47, Resident 48, Resident 49, and Resident 51). This failure resulted in residents not receiving accurate medications and had the potential to cause adverse reactions from medications. Findings: During a concurrent interview and record review on 3/14/24 at 8:31 a.m. with Director of Nursing (DON), the facility's Consultant Pharmacist's Medication Regimen Review (CPMRR), book dated 5/2023, 6/2023, 7/2023, 11/2023, and 12/2023 were reviewed. The CPMRR indicated the following medication errors per month: 5/20/2023, 3 errors Resident 48 - Order: Novolin R (insulin - control blood sugar) 100 u/ml (unit/milliliter) per low dose sliding scale: BS…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-03-14 · tag F0620 — patternNot require residents to give up Medicare or Medicaid benefits, or pay privately as a condition of admission; and must tell residents what care they do not provide.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure five of 49 sampled residents (Resident 15, Resident 32, Resident 108, Resident 259, and Resident 260) were provided a copy of the facility's admission policies and procedures (P&P) upon admission. This failure had the potential for residents to be unaware of the facilities policies, financial obligations, and their rights. Findings: During an interview on 3/11/24 at 3:54 p.m. with Social Service Designee (SSD), SSD stated she is responsible for completing admission packets with resident and family upon admission. SSD stated the Administrator would fill out the packet but she would review it with the Resident and family and obtain their signatures. During a concurrent interview and record review on 3/12/24 at 8:15 a.m. with SSD, the facility's New Admissions in the Last 30 days who are still residing in the facility was reviewed. SSD stated Resident 15 was admitted on [DATE] and the California Standard admission Agreement for Skilled Nursing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-14 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of 49 sampled residents (Resident 37) reported loss of personal belongings was investigated. This failure resulted in not recovering Resident 37's lost of personal belongings and had the potential for the recurrence of lost personal belongings of other residents. Findings: During an interview on 3/12/24 at 10:53 a.m. with Resident 37, Resident 37 stated he had reported a loss of clothing (two shirts and two pajama pants) to social services over four months ago and the issue had not yet been resolved. During an interview on 3/13/24 at 1:40 p.m. with Social Service Designee (SSD), SSD stated, I am aware of the lost personal belongings, some shirts [for Resident 37]. SSD stated Social Service Manager (SSM) and I handle the grievance process together and the SSM was handling this issue with Resident 37. During an interview on 3/13/24 at 1:53 p.m. with SSM, SSM stated he recalled Resident 37 verbally telling him about his loss of two shirts and two pajama bottoms around December 23, 2023. SSM stated it slipped his…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-14 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolatedEnsure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure two of 49 sampled residents (Resident 22 and Resident 309) were provided assistance with ADLs (ADL-tasks of everyday life including eating, dressing, getting in or out of a bed or chair, and bathing) when: 1. Resident 22 was not provided assistance with the use of her hearing aides. This failure resulted in Resident 22 not being able to communicate with the staff regarding her needs. 2. Resident 309 did not receive Restorative Nursing Assistant (RNA- nursing interventions that promote the ability to adapt and adjust to living as independently and safely as possible) treatments for three days. This failure had the potential for Resident 309 to have a decline in his ability to perform activities of daily living. Findings: 1. During a concurrent observation and interview on 3/11/24 at 10:37 a.m. in Resident 22's room, Resident 22 touched inside her ears and stated she was hard of hearing and wears hearing aides, and did not have them…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-14 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure infection control measures were done for two of 49 sampled residents (Resident 10 and Resident 32) when: 1. Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 2 did not assists Resident 10 with hand hygiene before eating. This failure had the potential to adversely affect Resident 10's health. 2. Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) did not wash her hands before and after wound treatment to Resident 32's wound in the coccyx (tailbone). This failure had the potential to result in infection of Resident 32's wound in the coccyx. Findings: 1. During a concurrent observation and interview on 3/11/24 at 12:31 p.m. with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 2 in Resident 10's room, CNA 2 delivered Resident 10's lunch tray without providing hand hygiene to Resident 10 who eats with her hands. CNA 2 stated she should have provided hand hygiene for Resident 10 before delivering her lunch tray. During an interview on 3/11/24 at 12:58 p.m. with Resident 10, Resident 10 stated she had not had her hands washed before her lunch tray was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-17 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolatedEnsure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to prevent abuse for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1). This failure had the potential for negative consequences including physical harm and/or emotional harm for Resident 1 and other facility residents. Findings: During an interview on 10/17/23 at 12:05 p.m. with Minimum Data Set Nurse (MDSN), MDSN stated on 10/8/23 Resident 1 was found by Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 1 with her legs restrained by a sheet. MDSN stated an investigation was started but the facility was unable to determine who tied Resident 1's legs together. MDSN stated Resident 1 is cognitively (mental process that deals with thoughts, memory, skills) impaired. MDSN stated Resident 1 repeats words but does not remember much else. During a review of Resident 1's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS), dated 9/14/23, the BIMS indicated, Resident 1 had a score of 6 (severely cognitively impaired). During a review of Resident 1's PHYSICIANS ORDERS (PO), dated 10/1/23, the PO indicated, there were no orders for the facility to use any type of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-17 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to implement its policy and procedure (P&P) regarding employee abuse training for one of three sampled Certified Nursing Assistants (CNA) 2. This failure had the potential for CNA 1 to not have knowledge on how to prevent, report and/or identify abuse in the facility. Findings: During a concurrent interview and record review on 10/17/23 at 12:55 p.m. with Director of Staff Development (DSD), the facility abuse education for staff ([NAME]) was reviewed. The [NAME] indicated CNA 2 had not received abuse training since 8/29/22. DSD stated abuse education is to be done minimally at least once a year or four hours of abuse training every two years for every staff member in the facility. DSD stated CNA 2 was out of compliance with her abuse training. During a review of the facility ' s policy and procedure (P&P) titled, IN-SERVICE TRAINING PROGRAM FOR CERTIFIED NURSE ASSISTANTS, not dated, the P&P indicated, SPECIAL NOTE: Each facility is required to complete…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-09 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify one of three sampled residents (Resident 2) resident's representative (RR) regarding a change of condition. This failure resulted in Resident 2's RR to be unaware of Resident 2's fall incident. Findings: During a concurrent interview and record review on 9/13/23, at 12:24 p.m. with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN 1), LVN 1 reviewed Resident 2's Post Fall Risk Review/Fall Risk Assessment v1.4 Change in Condition, (COC) dated 9/11/23, LVN 1 confirmed Resident 2 had an unwitnessed fall and undergone neurological checks (an exam evaluates brain and nervous system functioning). LVN 1 confirmed Resident 2's RR was not notified of Resident 2's fall incident. LVN 1 reviewed Resident 2's Interdisciplinary Progress Notes, (IPN) dated 9/11/23 to 9/13/23. LVN 1 confirmed Resident 2's RR was not notified. During a review of Resident 2's Admissions Record (AR), the AR indicated, Resident 2 had a RR and a POA (power of attorney- a legal document that allows someone else to act on your behalf). During a review of Resident 2's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-09 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement the plan of care for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1). This failure had the potential for accidents and injuries. Findings: During a review of Resident 1 Post Fall Risk Review/Fall Risk Assessment v1.4 Change in Condition, (COC) dated 8/28/23, the COC indicated Resident 1 had a witnessed fall. The COC indicated, Recommendations- . Other: low bed with fall mats During a concurrent observation and interview on 9/13/23, at 11:24 a.m. with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA 1), in Resident 1's room. CNA 1 confirmed Resident 1 was lying in bed and two mats were next to Resident 1's bed against the wall. CNA 1 stated The mats should be at bedside when (Resident 1) is in bed. During a concurrent interview and record review on 9/13/23, at 2:16 p.m. with Administrator, Administrator reviewed Resident 1's Plan of Care, (POC) with the focus on risk for falls, the POC indicated, Bilateral Fall mats effective date 8/31/23 . Administrator stated the plan of care should be resident specific documented and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-09 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to: 1. Complete a Neurological Record (NR) for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) after an unwitnessed fall. This failure had the potential for Resident 1 to experience unnoticed neurological deficits. 2. Ensure Fall Prevention, procedures were followed for one of three sampled residents (Resident 3). This failure had the potential to result in serious injuries. Findings: 1. During a review of Resident 1's Post Fall Risk Review/Fall Risk Assessment v1.4 Change in Condition, (COC) dated 8/25/23, the COC indicated Resident 1 had an unwitnessed fall. During a concurrent interview and record review on 10/2/23, at 3:45 p.m. with Quality Assurance Nurse (QAN), QAN stated the NR should be initiated immediately after an unwitnessed fall incident and end after 72 hours per facility protocol. QAN reviewed Resident's NR and confirmed Resident 1's NR, initiated on 8/25/23 at 9 p.m. was not completed. QAN reviewed Resident 1's medical record and confirmed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$27,716 in federal fines across 1 penalty. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.
- $27,716 — penalty dated 2024-03-14
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-07-08 for 13 days
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| ABU-ISSA, SHROOQ | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 05/01/2021 |
| COSNER, LAWRENCE | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 05/01/2023 |
| ELLIS, CHRISTOPHER | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 05/01/2021 |
| HANNON, MARGARET | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 05/01/2017 |
| HASLAM, GEORGE | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 05/01/2016 |
| HOPPUS, MARTHA | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 05/01/2022 |
| LYONS, DANA | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 05/01/2018 |
| READ, ANITA | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 05/01/2017 |
| RIZZARDINI, JAMES | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 05/01/2019 |
| SORBO, PAIGE | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 05/01/2017 |
| THARP, JUDITH | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 05/01/2022 |
| SUVER, JAMES | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 02/17/2009 |
| LOCK, KIMBERLY | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 12/02/2015 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 14 rows in the source record cover these 13 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
What families pay in CA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 555877. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-02-26, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.