Bethany Home Society San Joaquin County

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

63.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 105 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 47.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 40 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.05 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 2% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 51% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy at close to weekday levels right through the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 92 beds and averages 56.0 residents a day — about 61% occupied, or roughly 36 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.31 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.35 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.70 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.88 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.49 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.38 to 0.26 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 46% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

29 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 19 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-15 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure two of three residents (Resident 5 and Resident 8) were provided with a safe environment when:1. Resident 5 eloped (a resident leaving the premises or a secure area without authorization, supervision, or the knowledge of the staff) from the facility2. The C Hall exit door did not have an alarm activated during the day3. Resident 5 and Resident 8's [Brand Name] elopement bracelets (bracelet that can be placed on a resident and sets off a door alarm when the resident tries to exit through the door) were not checked at least daily for placement and function and not all exit doors at the facility were alarmed. These failures resulted in Resident 5 leaving the facility unsupervised and had the potential for Resident 8 to leave the facility unsupervised, with the potential for both Resident 5 and Resident 8 to experience getting lost and sustaining injuries, which had the potential to negatively affect their health, well-being, and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-15 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
  Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure one of three sampled residents' (Resident 1) drug regimen (a structured, prescribed plan for taking medication) was appropriately followed when Resident 1's prescribed narcotic pain medication (a strong, addictive, a regulated pain medication) that was prescribed for moderate to severe pain every six hours, was given without assessing Resident 1's pain level (the numerical pain scale 0 through 10; 0 indicates no pain,1 through 3 indicates mild pain; 4 through 6 indicates moderate pain; 7 through 10 indicates severe pain).This failure had the potential to result in Resident 1 being over-medicated and placed Resident 1 at risk for falls, negatively affecting Resident 1's health and well-being. Findings:A review of Resident 1's clinical document titled, admission RECORD, date printed 4/15/26, indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses which included dementia (a decline in brain function that interferes with daily life, usually caused by progressive, irreversible brain damage) and osteoporosis (a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-15 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review the facility failed to maintain complete and accurate records for one of two sampled residents (Resident 1) when Resident 1's document titled, Weekly Summary, (a weekly review of the resident's condition) for the week ending in 3/25/226, did not reflect Residents 1's current health status.This failure resulted in an inaccurate representation of Resident 1's current health status and had the potential to negatively impact Resident 1's health regarding wounds and pain management. Findings:A review of Resident 1's clinical document titled, admission RECORD, date printed 4/15/26, indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses which included dementia (a decline in brain function that interferes with daily life, usually caused by progressive, irreversible brain damage) and osteoporosis (a common bone disease making bones thin, brittle, and highly prone to fractures).A review of Resident 1's clinical document titled, Weekly Summary, dated 3/25/26, indicated, A. Skin Assessment . No wounds currently . Site . buttock . Type . MASD…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-08 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe monitoring practices for high-risk medication (drugs with potential to cause harm without monitoring) use in one out of four residents (Resident 1) when:1. Resident 1 was prescribed metoprolol (a medication used to control heart rate and rhythm) without orders to monitor Resident 1's blood pressure or heart rate; and2. Resident 1's experienced syncopal episodes (a brief loss of consciousnesses caused by a temporary decrease in blood flow to the brain) during transfers, which were not adequately documented or addressed by the licensed nurse (LN).These failures had the potential to result in unsafe medication use and adverse consequences for Resident 1.1. Review of Resident 1's admission RECORD indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included but was not limited to atrial fibrillation (A-Fib; heart rhythm disorder) and hypertension (HTN; high blood pressure). During a concurrent interview and record review on 9/5/25 at 2:33 PM, Resident 1's Order Summary Report, dated 9/25 and Blood…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-08 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to revise the restorative nursing program (RNP-nursing intervention to increase or maintain resident's mobility and to prevent further decline in mobility) for one of four sampled residents (Resident 1) when the RNP plan of care for passive range of motion (PROM - the movement of a joint through the range of motion with no effort from the patient) exercises to Resident 1's upper extremities was not revised following a right shoulder dislocation and fracture.This failure placed Resident 1 at risk for further injury, pain and discomfort to the right shoulder and right arm.Findings:During a review of Resident 1's admission RECORD, indicated that Resident 1 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included but were not limited to dementia (a decline in mental ability severe enough to interfere with daily life), displaced fracture of upper end of right humerus (arm bone), and unspecified dislocation of right shoulder (when the ball shaped head of the humerus bone (upper arm) comes out of the socket in the shoulder…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-07-18 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review the facility failed to revise a comprehensive elopement (leaving a designated area, often a place of supervision or care, without permission) risk care plan (a guide that healthcare workers used to ensure Resident 1 received tailored care to his/her individual needs and goals) for one of two residents at risk for elopement (Resident 1), when Resident 1 was seen by facility staff sitting outside of the building unattended.This failure placed Resident 1 at risk for elopement and injury. Findings:During a review of Resident 1's clinical record titled, admission RECORD, (a document that contained the resident's demographic information) indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility with a diagnoses that included Dementia (a condition which caused a decline in memory, reasoning, and other thinking skills), tremors (shaking), dizziness, and hypertension (high blood pressure - the force of blood pushing against the artery walls).A review of Resident 1's clinical record titled, BRIEF INTERVIEW FOR MENTAL STATUS, (BIMS - a screening tool used to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-18 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure adequate supervision for one of two sampled residents (Resident 1), at risk for elopement (leaving a designated area, often a place of supervision or care, without permission), when Resident 1 was found outside of the physical therapy office back door on 5/27/25 at approximately 5:00 p.m.This failure placed Resident 1 at risk of serious injury and harm.Findings:During a review of Resident 1's clinical record titled, admission RECORD, (a document that contained the resident's demographic information) indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility with a diagnoses that included Dementia (a condition which caused a decline in memory, reasoning, and other thinking skills), tremor (shaking), dizziness, and hypertension (high blood pressure- the force of blood pushing against the artery walls).A review of Resident 1's clinical record titled, Progress Notes, dated 5/27/25 at 10:37 p.m., written by the Licensed Nurse (LN) 1, indicated at approximately 5:00 p.m., Resident 1 was found outside by the physical…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-21 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure documentation and monitoring of temperature range in one out of one medication refrigerator for a period of 6 months with resident census of 63. This failed practice may have contributed to unsafe storage of refrigerated medication resulting in altered potency and unusable medications based on manufacturer specification. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 3/18/25, at 9:20 AM, with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LN) 4, the refrigerator at North hall station stored multiple containers of flu vaccine (flu same as influenza, an infection affecting the breathing system), resident's insulin (medication used to treat blood sugar disease), other refrigerated prescription medications, and Emergency Kit (or Ekit, a sealed container containing insulin and other refrigerated products for urgent use). The thermometer inside the refrigerator was within the approved and safe temperature range (36-to-46-degree Fahrenheit [a measure of temperature]). LN 4 was unable to provide North hall station…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-21 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's right to be free from verbal abuse for one of sixteen sampled residents (Resident 44) when, Resident 44 was cursed at by Licensed Nurse (LN) 5. This failure had the potential to cause emotional distress and could negatively affect Resident 44's psychosocial well-being. Findings: Review of Resident 44's admission RECORD, indicated Resident 44 was admitted with diagnoses including depression (mental health condition characterized by persistent feelings of sadness) and anxiety (persistent worry) disorders. Review of Resident 44's Minimum Data Set [an assessment tool], dated 2/4/25, indicated Resident 44's Brief Interview for Mental Status score was 13 out of 15 suggesting an intact cognitive functioning (a person's mental processes, including thinking, learning, memory, and reasoning, are functioning normally and without any significant impairment). Review of Resident 44's IDT [Interdisciplinary Team; a group of healthcare professionals] Note, dated 11/13/24, indicated, .On 11/1/2024…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-21 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
  Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the safe use of psychotropic medications (mind altering drugs used to control behavior or thought process) for two of five sampled residents (Resident 44 and Resident 52) reviewed for unnecessary medications use when: 1. The physician did not document specific duration for the extended use of the as needed (or PRN) lorazepam (or Ativan, a psychotropic medication for anxiety) beyond 14 days for Resident 52. 2. There was no documented evidence of non-pharmacological interventions (means helping residents with behavioral issue without use of the drugs) for Resident 44 and Resident 52 while taking psychotropic medications for treatment of anxiety. These failures had the potential for unsafe use of psychotropic medications resulting in negative impact or adverse drug effects on Resident 44's and Resident 52's health. Findings: 1. During a concurrent interview with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LN) 3, and record review of Resident 52's medical record, on 3/20/25, at 9:18 AM, LN 3 confirmed Resident 52's order for a routine…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 21 rows in the source record cover these 16 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CA