No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Community Care On Palm

4768 Palm Avenue, Riverside, CA 92501 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 51 certified beds · (951) 686-9001 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (951) 686-9001 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Sep 2024Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)3 actual-harm citations$33,540 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Sep 2024
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605, F0607, F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has 3 actual-harm citations
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (44) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $33,540 in federal fines (most recent 2023-11-28)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

4/5
CMS overall
4 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 3 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 4 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★ 2/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
4646 Brockton Ave · (951) 774-2952 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
4646 Brockton Ave · (951) 788-4646 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
4050 University Ave · (951) 328-9252 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Tequesquito Arroyo Park · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 3 to 4 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating4★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased12.2%10.2%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight0.6%4.0%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.8%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%1.2%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms46.3%7.3%6.5%check this — see note marked dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.4%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury2.1%1.6%3.3%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened0.9%9.8%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication29.6%13.7%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine95.8%98.2%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers1.0%4.3%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control8.5%10.2%21.2%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine86.7%93.2%79.4%typical
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission8.3%23.0%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit1.2%11.2%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days4.802.251.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.931.571.80typical

This value is several times the typical-state benchmark. It can be real, or it can be a coding artifact in what the facility submitted. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

10.7%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
86.7%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.44U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.28hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.15hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.01hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 86.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 45 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.44 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 75% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 49% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.7%CMS range 6.1–15.610.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge86.7%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge71.1%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge66.7%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization6.4%CMS range 2.6–11.97.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.781.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.69
RN hours/ resident / day
1.20
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.64
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.54
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.18
RN hoursweekends
38.2%
Total nursing turnover
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 51 beds and averages 48.1 residents a day — about 94% occupied, or roughly 3 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.54 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.69 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.64 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.81 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.83 on weekdays — 21% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.90 to 0.18 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 38% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

9
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-04-16)
8
at the previous standard inspection (2025-04-11)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

44 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 31 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-06-27 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to protect the resident ' s right to be free from physical abuse for one out of six residents reviewed (Resident 2), when another resident (Resident 1) hit Resident 2 on the head with a cane. This failure resulted in Resident 2 sustaining four lacerations (deep cut/tear in skin) on his head and bruising to his hands and shoulder. Resident 2 was transferred to the acute hospital, where he received 18 staples (surgical staples - used to close large wounds or deep cuts) to treat his head wounds. Findings: On June 4, 2024, at 9:10 a.m., an unannounced visit was made to the facility to investigate a facility-reported resident-to-resident altercation between Resident 1 and Resident 2 on June 1, 2024. On June 4, 2024, at 9:30 a.m., Resident 1 was interviewed. Resident 1 was alert and oriented. Resident 1 stated he did hit his former roommate (Resident 2) in the head with a cane because he thought Resident 2 messed with his radio. Resident 1 stated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-06-27 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident environment was free of accident hazards for one out of six residents reviewed for accidents, when Resident 1 had access to a cane which he used to hit Resident 2. This failure resulted in Resident 2 sustaining four lacerations (deep cut/tear in skin) on his head and bruising to his hands and shoulder. Resident 2 was transferred to the acute hospital, where he received 18 staples (surgical staples - used to close large wounds or deep cuts) to treat his head wounds. Findings: On June 4, 2024, at 9:10 a.m., an unannounced visit was made to the facility to investigate a facility-reported resident-to-resident altercation. On June 4, 2024, at 9:10 a.m., the Director of Nursing (DON) was interviewed. The DON stated Resident 1 had a history of property destruction. The DON stated Resident 1 hit Resident 2 with a cane on June 1, 2024. The DON stated Resident 1 did not use or have a cane. The DON stated the cane belonged to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-01-04 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the safety for one of five residents reviewed for falls (Resident 1), when the fall risk care plan was not evaluated for effectiveness and updated to reflect new interventions to prevent further falls, and the fall risk assessments did not accurately reflect Resident 1's fall risk. This facility failure resulted in Resident 1 having repeated falls on November 16, 2023, November 22, 2023, and December 4, 2023. Resident 1 sustained a right radius fracture (broken bone to right arm), laceration (deep cut) requiring sutures to the area above the right eyebrow, and a mildly displaced fracture of adjacent maxillary processes (two missing front teeth) after the second fall on November 22, 2023, which required Resident 1's transfer to the acute care hospital for medical intervention. Findings: On December 5, 2023, at 8:39 a.m., an observation was conducted with Resident 1. Resident 1 was in bed asleep. Resident 1 was observed wearing a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-04-16 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe and sanitary food preparation and storage practices in the kitchen when:1. [NAME] 1 was performing food preparation without a beard restraint and the Dietary Aide had bangs exposed outside the hairnet while working in the kitchen.2. The stovetop was covered with a thick, crusty layer of black and brown grease.3. The interior and exterior surfaces of the oven were coated with heavy, dark buildup, exterior side of the oven door and its handle were coated with thick, heavy residue of old grease and dark deposits, and the bottom part of the oven was coated in a layer of sticky dust and oil residue.These failures had the potential to expose residents who received food from the kitchen to contaminants and could put them at risk of food-borne illnesses.4. An opened, unsealed bag of brown sugar was found unlabeled and undated.This failure had the potential for the food product to go bad, become contaminated, or attract pests to the kitchen.Findings:1. During an observation in the kitchen on 4/13/2026, at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-04-16 · tag F0552 — pattern
    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to obtain informed consent (voluntary agreement to accept treatment and/or procedures after receiving education regarding the risks, benefits, and alternatives offered) for five of five sampled residents (Residents 36, 53, 41, 21, and 1) on psychotropic (affecting brain activities associated with mental processes and behavior) medications. This failure had the potential for residents or their representatives to not be fully informed of the risks and benefits of psychotropic medications before receiving treatment.Findings: 1. A review of Resident 36's physician's orders indicated Resident 36 had orders for the following psychotropic medications: - Sertraline (generic for Zoloft, a psychotropic medication to treat depression) 50 milligrams (mg) by mouth one time a day for depression, dated 4/4/25; - Lorazepam (generic for Ativan, a psychotropic medication to treat anxiety) 0.5 mg by mouth two times a day for anxiety, dated 7/21/25 and 4/3/26; - Divalproex (generic for Depakote, a psychotropic medication to treat mood disorders)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-04-16 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — pattern
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility had a medication error rate of 17.14% when six medication errors occurred out of 35 opportunities during the medication administration observation for four out of five residents (Residents 28, 7, 6, and 40). These failures resulted in medications not given according to the physician's orders and had the potential for residents to not receive the full therapeutic effect of medications. These failures also had the potential for blockages to develop in Resident 6's gastrostomy tube (G-tube or feeding tube, a tube inserted through the abdomen that delivers nutrition and medications directly to the stomach). Findings: 1. During a medication pass observation on 4/14/26, at 8:14 AM, at Resident 28's bedside, Licensed Vocational Nurse 5 (LVN 5) was observed administering nine medications to Resident 28. The medications included two 125 milligram (mg) capsules of delayed release divalproex (generic for Depakote Sprinkles, a medication to treat mood disorders) for a dose of 250 mg. A review of Resident 28's physician's orders,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-16 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of six residents (Resident 47) was treated with dignity and respect when a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA 1) stood over the resident while feeding her.This failure had the potential to cause diminished dignity, loss of individuality, and decreased psychosocial well-being during the dining experience for Resident 47.Findings:A review of Resident 47's admission Record (demographic clinical information) indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Cerebral Infarction, unspecified (blood clot cuts off blood flow to a part of the brain), Schizophrenia, unspecified (a brain disorder that causes people to interpret reality abnormally often resulting in disorganized thinking), and Depression.During an observation on 4/13/26, at 12:56 PM, in Resident 47's room, CNA 1 was observed feeding Resident 47 lunch while standing over the resident, who was seated in a wheelchair. CNA 1 continued to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-16 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
    Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of five sampled residents (Resident 1) was free from unnecessary psychotropic medications (medications that affect brain activities associated with mental processes and behavior) when Resident 1 received an as needed antipsychotic medication (type of psychotropic medication) without physician evaluation. This failure had the potential for Resident 1 to inappropriately receive an as needed antipsychotic medication and had a risk of medication side effects, such as sedation and falls. Findings: A review of Resident 1's admission record, dated 4/16/26, indicated Resident 1 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The admission record indicated Resident 1's diagnoses included schizophrenia (a mental illness characterized by disturbances in thought). A review of Resident 1's physician's orders, dated 3/17/26, indicated Resident 1 had renewed orders for Zyprexa (brand name for olanzapine, an antipsychotic medication to treat mental…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-16 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the accuracy of the Minimum Data Set (MDS, a resident assessment tool) for two of five sampled residents (Residents 21 and 53). This failure had the potential for Residents 21 and 53 to not receive necessary care or services related to their antipsychotic medications (medications to treat mental illness). Findings: 1. A review of Resident 21's MDS Section N - Medications, dated 2/25/26, indicated Resident 21 was receiving antipsychotic medication at the time of the assessment. The record further indicated the physician documented gradual dose reduction (GDR, stepwise tapering of a medication to determine if symptoms can be managed at a lower dose) of the antipsychotic was contraindicated on 8/14/23. During a concurrent interview and record review on 4/16/26 at 8:46 AM with the MDS Coordinator (MDSC), Resident 21's Plan of Care Note, dated 2/13/26, and MDS Section N, dated 2/25/26, were reviewed. The MDSC stated the note indicated the prescriber documented GDR of Resident 21's antipsychotics was contraindicated. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-16 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure an individualized care plan was developed when one of two residents (Resident 32) did not have a care plan for an actual fall.This failure had the potential to result in recurrent falls and serious injury due to lack of interventions to ensure Resident 32's safety following the initial fall event.Findings:1. A review of Resident 32's admission Record. (a document showing a summary of the resident's information) dated 4/15/2026 indicated Resident 32 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of abnormalities of gait and mobility.During an interview on 4/14/2026, at 8:23 AM, with Resident 32, Resident 32 stated I fell. Resident 32 stated that he lost his balance and fell while getting out of bed on the previous day.A review of Resident 32's Care Plan Report, undated, indicated there was no care plan problem related to Resident 32's fall incident on 4/13/2026. During a concurrent interview and record review on 4/15/2026, at 4:32 PM,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-16 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure accurate accountability of controlled medications (controlled substances [CS], those with high potential for abuse and addiction) when the Controlled Substance Records (CSR, accountability records) for one of three randomly selected residents (Resident 41) did not reconcile with the Medication Administration Records (MAR, daily documentation record used by a licensed nurse to document medications and treatments given to a resident). This failure resulted in inaccurate accountability of controlled substances and the potential for unidentified discrepancies and possible abuse or diversion of controlled substances. Findings:A review of Resident 41's physician's orders, dated 3/19/26, indicated Resident 41 had orders for tramadol (a controlled medication for pain) 50 milligrams (mg), Give 1 tablet by mouth every 6 hours as needed for severe pain. During a concurrent interview and record review on 4/14/26, at 4:10 PM, with Licensed Vocational Nurse 3 (LVN 3), Resident 41's CSR, dated 3/20/26, and MAR, dated March 2026,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-16 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to implement infection prevention and control practices to provide a safe and sanitary environment when a used urinal was found on one of 49 residents (Resident 32)'s bedside table. This deficient practice had the potential to expose residents to infection-causing substances in the facility. Findings:During an observation on 4/13/2026, at 9:23 AM, a urinal with bloody urine was found on Resident 32's bedside table next to a water pitcher. Bloody urine was observed on the outside of the urinal near the opening at the top and the lid was open.During an observation on 4/13/2026, at 3:20 PM, a urinal with bloody urine was found on Resident 32's bedside table next to a water pitcher and an empty food tray. Bloody urine was observed on the outside of the urinal near the opening at the top, and the lid was open.During an interview on 4/13/26, at 3:23 PM, with Certified Nursing Assistant 2 (CNA 2), CNA 2 verified the urinal with urine was on Resident 32's bedside table next to an empty food tray and confirmed the urinal…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-22 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolated
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide food at appropriate temperatures according to the residents' preferences for three out of five sample residents, Residents 3, 4, and 5.This failure had the potential for Residents 3, 4, and 5 to be at risk for decreased nutritional intake which could cause unplanned weight loss and affect their overall nutritional status.Findings: On December 22, 2025, at 7:17 a.m., during a concurrent observation and interview, Resident 3 was sitting in his wheelchair in the dining room and was served breakfast. Resident 3 began eating his food, and stated the food was warm, but sometimes his breakfast was cold, and he had to wait 20 minutes to get his food in the dining room.On December 22, 2025, at 7:18 a.m., during an observation in the dining room, Resident 4 was served breakfast. On December 22, 2025, at 7:40 a.m., during a concurrent observation and interview, Resident 5 was sitting in her bed, and was almost finished with her breakfast.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 31 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2025-11-25 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a care plan was initiated and/or developed to address the diagnoses of epistaxis (bleeding from the nose) for one of one residents reviewed for quality of care (Resident 1).This failure had the potential for Resident 1 to not be monitored for epistaxis complications and delayed treatment, increasing the risk of further harm. Findings:On November 25, 2025, at 8:00 a.m. an unannounced visit was conducted at the facility to investigate a facility reported incident.On November 25, 2025, at 8:00 a.m., an observation with a concurrent interview was conducted with Resident 1. Resident 1 was observed in bed, alert and interviewable. Red stains resembling blood were observed on Resident 1's gown, specifically in the chest area. Similar stains were also noted on a washcloth located beside Resident 1. Resident 1 stated she experienced nose bleeds often. On November 25,2025, at 8: 15a.m, an interview was conducted with Licensed Vocational…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-25 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure two of two residents reviewed for breathing treatment therapy (Residents 4 and 2), were monitored during and after nebulizer treatments (breathing treatments that turn liquid medicine into a mist).This failure placed the residents at risk for delayed treatment related to possible complications of the nebulizing treatment such as rapid heart rate, restlessness, chest pain and/or difficulty breathing.Findings:1.On November 25, 2025, at 8:30 a.m., and observation was conducted with Resident 4. Resident was in bed, alert, and non-verbal. A nebulizer mask (mask used to breathe in medicated mist) was observed connected over her nose and mouth. The medication chamber (small cup that holds the liquid medicine) was observed empty. There was no licensed nurse observed beside Resident 4.On November 25, 2025, at 8:45 a.m., an interview was conducted with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 1. LVN 1 stated she should have stayed in the room with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-11 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure pharmacy services were provided to meet the needs of the resident when one prescribed medication was not administered as ordered on twelve separate occasions for one of one resident (Resident 23). This failure had the potential to result in ineffective treatment of Resident 23's symptoms and interrupted care. Findings: Resident 23's record was reviewed. Resident 23 was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included dementia with psychotic disturbances (a cognitive decline accompanied by psychosis - hallucinations and/or delusions) and impulse disorder (inability to resist urges or impulses that can lead to harmful or disruptive behaviors). A review of Resident 23's Physician Order, dated March 14, 2025, indicated, .increase Rexulti (antipsychotic medicine used to treat dementia that helps balance chemicals in the brain known to affect mood and thoughts.) 0.5 mg (milligram - a unit of measurement) to Rexulti 2 mg by mouth…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-04-11 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — pattern
    Provide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that dietary staff safely and effectively carried out the functions of food and nutrition services when: 1. Dietary staff, including the dietitian, were not aware of the manufacturer's recommended time guidelines for testing the red bucket Quaternary (Quat) sanitizer (sanitizing solution used for sanitizing food contact surfaces); 2. [NAME] 2 did not demonstrate competency in performing assigned duties; (Cross reference 803) 3. [NAME] 1 did not demonstrate competency in performing assigned duties; and (Cross reference 803) 4. [NAME] 3 did not follow the prescribed recipe when preparing pureed macaroni and cheese during dinner on April 9, 2025. These failures had the potential to cause foodborne illness for 49 out of 50 sampled residents and compromised the nutritional status of residents receiving food from the facility's kitchen. Findings: 1. A review of the Quat sanitizer manufacturer's guidelines posted above 2 compartment sink at the kitchen indicated, Dip test paper for 10 seconds in test…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-11 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure: 1. [NAME] 2 followed the recipe when preparing pureed meat and peas during lunch on April 9, 2025; 2. [NAME] 2 used the correct scoop to portion mechanical soft meat during lunch on April 9, 2025; 3. Resident 34, who had a physician-ordered Consistent Carbohydrate (CCHO) diet, was served the correct portion of taco during lunch on April 8, 2025; 4. Resident 3, who had a physician-ordered renal diet, was served appropriate food items during lunch on April 9, 2025, and April 10, 2025; and 5. Resident 33, who had physician-ordered heart healthy diet, was served appropriate food items during lunch on April 9, 2025. These failures had the potential to result in residents receiving food that did not meet their prescribed dietary needs, which could lead to nutrition-related health complications. Findings: (Cross Reference 802) 1. During a general food production observation and interview conducted on April 9, 2025, at 10:41 a.m., in the kitchen with [NAME] 2 (CK 2), CK 2 was observed preparing pureed peas.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-11 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident with a prescribed nectar-thick liquid consistency, as ordered by the physician, was served regular thin liquid coffee, for one of nine residents (Resident 8). This failure had the potential to cause resident to choke or aspirate (inhalation of food or liquid into the lungs), placing them at risk for serious health complications. Findings: On April 8, 2025, at 12:17 p.m., during a concurrent observation and interview with the Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA). Resident 8 was observed eating her lunch in the dining room. Resident 8 was served a cup of regular thin liquid coffee. The CNA who was assisting Resident 8 with feeding, stated, the coffee was provided ready to drink and stated she had not checked the consistency. The CNA stated, Resident 8 should not have received a thin liquid. On April 10, 2025, Resident 8's record was reviewed. Resident 8 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-11 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe and sanitary food preparation and storage practices in the kitchen when: 1. Dust was observed on kitchen equipment and in various locations within the kitchen; 2. An expired sanitizer test strip was found in use. 3. A box of nutritional shake was stored next to defrosting raw meat in the refrigerator; 4. Wilted cilantro was found stored in Reach in Refrigerator # (number) 1; 5. An open bottle of lemonade syrup was stored next to a sanitizer solution bucket; 6. Dust accumulation was oberved on the floor under a table counter; 7. Black grime buildup was observed on the outside of the oven; 8. Three white plastic spatula, two serving tongs handle, and one small spatula had chipped; 9. A trash bag was used as a liner to store a bulk quantity of sugar; and 10. One unlabeled soda was found in a resident's refrigerator. These failures had the potential to cause foodborne illness (stomach illness acquired from ingesting contaminated food) in a medically vulnerable population of 49 out of 49 residents who…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-11 · tag F0636 — isolated
    Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a comprehensive nutritional assessment was completed within 14 calendar days after admission for one of three residents reviewed (Resident 42). This failure had the potential to delay the provision of resident-centered care (care focusing on the needs of individuals) and nutritional interventions necessary to address the resident's health needs. Findings: On April 8, 2025, at 12:26 p.m., during a concurrent observation and interview in Resident 42's room, Resident 42 was observed eating her lunch meal. Resident 42 stated she had a new denture and was ready to eat regular food. Resident 42 further stated, she was tired of eating baby food and she did not like to lose weight. On April 10, 2025, Resident 42's record was reviewed. Resident 42 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included protein-calorie malnutrition (inadequate intake of nutritional food). A review of Resident 42's History and Physical, dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-11 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications and biologicals were properly stored and disposed of when expired sterile (entirely free of microorganisms) dressings (medical bandage designed to protect a wound from infection), were found inside a treatment cart and were readily available for use. This failure had the potential to result in residents receiving wound treatments with expired dressings, leading to ineffective treatment and an increased risk of infection. Findings: On [DATE], at 11:55 a.m., during a treatment cart inspection with the Registered Nurse (RN), expired dressings were found stored in the cart and available for use. One pack of sterile, non-adhesive (designed to not stick to the wound) foam dressing with an expiration date of [DATE], and five packs of sterile gauze (made from woven fabric) dressings with an expiration date of [DATE], were observed in the treatment cart. In a concurrent interview, the RN stated the expired dressings should not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-11 · tag F0808 — failed to follow doctor-ordered diets — isolated
    Ensure therapeutic diets are prescribed by the attending physician and may be delegated to a registered or licensed dietitian, to the extent allowed by State law.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the therapeutic diet order (diet ordered by a physician) prescribed by the physician was followed for one of three residents (Resident 42) who had an order for a fortified diet (additional nutrients). This failure had the potential for Resident 42 to not receive adequate nutrition, which could further compromise her medical status. Findings: On April 8, 2025, at 12:26 p.m., during a concurrent observation and interview in Resident 42's room, Resident 42's meal tray card indicated a fortified diet. Resident 42 was served a full eight oz cup (ounce-unit of measurement) of tea. Resident 42 stated, she was always served tea at lunch but would prefer milk. Resident 42 further stated, I don't want to lose weight. On April 10, 2025, Resident 42's record was reviewed. Resident 42 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included mild protein-calorie malnutrition (deficiency of protein and/or calories). A review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-05 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure, for one of four residents, Resident 1, who was identified as at risk for elopement (a resident leaving the facility unsupervised and unnoticed) and was on line of sight (a resident being within the view of staff members) monitoring was supervised by staff. This failure resulted in Resident 1 eloping from the facility on October 13, 2024, which placed Resident 1 at risk for sustaining serious injury such as being struck by a vehicle or death. Findings: On November 5, 2024, at 9:28 a.m., an unannounced visit was conducted at the facility to investigate a facility reported incident. A review of Resident 1's medical record was conducted. The admission Record indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included cardiac arrhythmia (irregular heart rhythm) and schizophrenia (mental illness) and that he was under a conservatorship (a legal status which a court appoints another person to act or make decisions for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-04 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of three residents reviewed (Resident 1) was free from physical abuse when Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 1 slapped Resident 1 on the face. This failure had the potential for Resident 1 to suffer physical and emotional injury. Findings: On September 3 and 4, 2024, unannounced visits were made to the facility to investigate an allegation of physical abuse. On September 3, 2024, Resident 1 ' s record was reviewed. Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included dementia (memory loss) and schizophrenia (a mental disorder that affects a person ' s ability to think, feel, and behave clearly). During a concurrent observation and interview on September 3, 2024, at 10:23 a.m., with Resident 1, Resident 1 was observed lying in bed, awake and alert. Resident 1 was verbally responsive and was Spanish speaking. The interview was conducted with the assistance of a Spanish speaking staff. Resident 1 stated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-24 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure infection control practice was followed when two of three direct patient care staff were observed to wear long and artificial nails. This failure had the potential for the vulnerable residents to be exposed to bacterial cross contamination and the development of infection. Findings: On April 24, 2024, an unannounced visit was conducted to investigate a facility reported incident and a complaint. During a concurrent observation and interview on April 24, 2024, at 5:10 a.m., with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 1, CNA 1 was observed to wear long painted nails on both hands. The fingernails were pointed, and approximately more than quarter of an inch long passed the tip of the finger. CNA 1 stated she was from the registry (a staff personnel provided by a placement service on a temporary or on a day-to-day basis). CNA 1 stated she was allowed by the registry to have long fingernails at work. During a concurrent observation and interview on April 24, 2024, at 5:18 a.m., with the Licensed Vocational Nurse…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-03-14 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe and sanitary conditions were maintained in the kitchen for food storage methods and food sanitation equipment when the ice machine was observed to have a build-up of a slimy pink, yellow and bright green substances where ice is formed. This failure had the potential for contamination, which could result in food borne illnesses for all residents who consume ice from the facility's ice machine. The facility census was 44. Findings: On March 11, 2024, at 9:31 a.m., an observation and concurrent interview with the facility's Maintenance Supervisor (MS) was completed. The MS opened the interior of the ice machine, there was a slimy pink and yellow substances on the white shield that was over the ice grates. There was bright green build-up where the water flows out of the ice grates. The MS stated the ice machine was last cleaned on January 11, 2024, with a descaler (a solution used to remove a coating, layer, or crust from a surface). The MS stated he uses a descaler to clean the ice machine every six…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-03-14 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — widespread
    Conduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the facility assessment was reviewed and updated annually and as needed. This failure resulted in an inaccurate evaluation of the facility's population and resources needed to provide the necessary care and services for the residents. During a concurrent interview and record review on March 14, 2024, at 11:02 a.m., with the Administrator (ADM), the ADM stated he was responsible for conducting the facility assessment. The ADM stated the facility assessment should have been reviewed and updated annually. The ADM stated the facility assessment was not reviewed or updated annually. The ADM stated he was not able to initiate the facility assessment. The ADM stated the last facility assessment was on April 18, 2021. During a review of the facility's policy and procedure (P&P), titled, Facility Assessment, revised October 2018, the P&P indicated, .A facility assessment is conducted annually to determine and update our capacity to meet the needs of and competently care for our residents during day-to-day operations .Once a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-03-14 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to initiate and implement their water management program to ensure safe measures in the building's water system. This failure had the potential to increase the risk of the development of Legionella (a specific bacteria that can cause serious type of pneumonia - lung infection) called Legionnaires disease, and other water-borne pathogens in the building's water system which can affect the health and safety of the residents. Findings: On March 13, 2024, at 9:25 a.m., an interview and a review of facility's Legionella Water Management Program was conducted with the Director of Staff Development/Infection Preventionist (DSD/IP). The DSD/IP stated the facility had no current water management measures to prevent Legionella. The DSD/IP was not able to provide documented evidence of the facility's monitoring measures to prevent the growth of Legionella in the facility's building water system. The DSD/IP stated the facility's Legionella Water Management Program was not acted upon and initiated. On March 14, 2024, at 10:08 a.m., an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-14 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the lunch menu was followed on February 27, 2024, when residents were served two and a half ounces of chicken instead of three ounces as indicated on the menu for lunch on Monday, March 11, 2024. This failure had the potential for residents' nutritional needs not to be met by being served less than the menu stated portion in accordance with a prescribed regular diet. Findings: During an observation on March 11, 2024, at 11:54 a.m., of the facilities lunch preparation, the cook served a piece of chicken on each of the residents' plate who was on a regular diet. She used tongs to pick up the piece of chicken and place it on the residents' plates. The chicken portion being served was weighed by the Dietary Services Supervisor (DSS) and it was two and a half ounces. A review of the lunch menu for Monday, March 11, 2024, indicated Herb and Honey Glazed Chicken .3 oz. (ounces - unit of measurement). During an interview with the facility's Registered Dietitian (RD) on March 12, 2024, at 2:36 p.m., RD stated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-14 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure pureed (food blended to a smooth, creamy consistency) food was the appropriate consistency to meet the individual needs of four out of 44 residents (Residents 4, 5, 10 and 25). This failure had the potential for residents on a pureed diet to aspirate (draw food into the lungs) and/or negatively impact the resident's dining experience resulting in poor food intake, compromising their nutritional status. Findings: During tray line observation on March 11, 2024, at 11:53 a.m., the pureed chicken was a chunky consistency and not smooth. During a test tray evaluation on March 12, 2024, at 12:19 p.m., the pureed ground beef had a texture of crumbles, (not smooth) and required chewing to swallow. An interview with the Dietary Services Supervisor (DSS) was conducted on March 12, 2024, at 12:25 p.m. The DSS stated the pureed beef was not smooth and It needs to be more moist and should have more broth. The DSS further stated the beef was too crumbly. During an interview with the facilities Registered Dietician…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-14 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure respect and dignity for one of four sampled residents (Resident 4) during mealtime when Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 1 was standing over Resident 4 while feeding her. This failure had the potential to negatively affect Resident 4's emotional health. Findings: During an observation on March 11, 2024, at 12:21 p.m., CNA 1 was feeding Resident 4 while eating lunch. CNA 1 was standing over Resident 4, who was sitting in a chair at the dining table in an upright position. The resident asked CNA 1 to go and get a chair. During an interview on March 13, 2024, at 9:55 a.m., with CNA 1, CNA 1 stated she assisted Resident 4 while eating lunch. CNA 1 stated she was standing and should have been sitting at eye-level while assisting Resident 4. During a review of the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Assistance with Meals, dated July 2017, the P&P indicated, .Residents who cannot feed themselves will be fed with attention and safety, comfort and dignity .not standing over residents while assisting…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-14 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement their policy on abuse prevention when Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 1 did not identify, recognize, and believe a resident's allegation that a staff member came to her room and slapped her buttock while changing her diaper, for one resident reviewed (Resident 16). In addition, LVN 1 did not identify Resident 16's allegation as abuse due to the resident's history of reporting false allegations. This failure had the potential for Resident 16 and other residents to not be protected from potential abuse and the allegation not being investigated timely. Findings: On March 13, 2024, at 10:30 a.m., during a confidential Resident Council meeting held during the facility's re-certification survey, Resident 16 stated a little girl came to her room on noc shift (night) and slapped her buttock while changing her diaper. During an interview on March 13, 2024, at 11:46 a.m., with LVN 2 she stated she was not aware of Resident 16's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-14 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's allegation of abuse was immediately reported to the Administrator or State Agency at the mandated time frame (immediately but not later than two hours), when a resident told Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 1, a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) slapped her buttock while changing her diaper, for one of one resident reviewed (Resident 16). This failure had the potential to place Resident 16 and other residents' at risk from harm and delayed the investigation of an allegation of abuse. Findings: On March 13, 2024, at 10:30 a.m., during a confidential Resident Council meeting held during the facility's re-certification survey, Resident 16 stated a little girl came to her room on noc shift (night) and slapped her buttock while changing her diaper. During an interview on March 13, 2024, at 11:46 a.m., with LVN 2 she stated she was not aware of Resident 16's allegation. She stated she did not receive any report from the staff…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-14 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to initiate a care plan for resident's left lower chin swelling and redness on March 8, 2024, for one of one resident reviewed (Resident 5). This failure had the potential to delay the necessary care and services for Resident 5's left lower chin redness and swelling. Findings: On March 11, 2024, at 11:48 a.m., Resident 5 was observed sitting in a Geri chair (geriatric chair - used for patient with difficulty sitting upright) in the dining room. Resident 5 was alert and able to verbalize his needs. Resident 5's teeth was observed with blackish discoloration with irregular shapes and some teeth were missing. He stated he could chew on his food. His left lower chin area was observed with some swelling and some redness. Resident 5 was asked if he was seen by the dentist. He stated he did not want to see a dentist, he just wanted to take an antibiotic. The Activity Coordinator (AC) was present in the dining area. The AC stated she noticed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-14 · tag F0678 — failed to provide CPR when needed — isolated
    Provide basic life support, including CPR, prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel , subject to physician orders and the resident’s advance directives.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the facility staff have a current and active Cardio-Pulmonary Resuscitation (CPR - a life-saving procedure used to restart a person's heartbeat and breathing after one or both have stopped) certification, when two of 11 Certified Nursing Assistants (CNA) had expired CPR certification. This failure had the potential for the facility residents not to receive emergency care leading to resident harm and/or death. Findings: During a review of CNA 2's employee file, CNA 2 was hired by the facility on [DATE]. The copy of CNA 2's CPR certification indicated an expiration date of [DATE]. There was no documented evidence CNA 2 had a current CPR certification. During a review of CNA 1's employee file, CNA 1 was hired by the facility on February 22, 2023. A copy of CNA 1's CPR certification was not found in the employee file. During a concurrent interview and record review on [DATE], at 3:10 p.m., with the Director for Staff Development/Infection…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-14 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed for two of two residents reviewed (Residents 22 and 42), to ensure: 1. For Resident 22, the licensed staff assessed, notified the physician, and documented when Resident 22 experienced low blood sugar (BS). This failure had the potential for a delay in treatment that could lead to harm and/or death for Resident 22. 2. For Resident 42, followed the regular diet order when Resident 42 received pureed (food blended to a smooth, creamy consistency) bread during lunch on March 13, 2024. This failure resulted in Resident 42's feeling of dissatisfaction with her meals. Findings 1. During an observation on March 13, 2024, at 11:29 a.m., Resident 22 wheeled herself to the nurse's station. Resident 22 asked for her nurse to check her BS. During an interview on March 13, 2024, at 11:35 a.m., with Resident 22, Resident 22 stated the nurses checked her BS three times a day before meals. Resident 22 stated she felt her sugar was low usually around 4 a.m.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-14 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide respiratory care and treatment for one of two residents reviewed for oxygen administration (Resident 10), when the physician's order for oxygen administration was not followed. This failure had the potential to result in ineffective oxygen therapy, respiratory distress, and decline in the resident's health condition. Findings: On March 11, 2024, at 11:04 a.m., Resident 10 was observed in bed with oxygen (O2) via nasal cannula (NC - a tube used to deliver oxygen through the nose). Resident 10's oxygen administration was observed at 3 liters per minute (LPM). On March 11, 2024, at 11:23 a.m., a concurrent observation, interview and record review was conducted with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 2. LVN 2 confirmed the O2 level for Resident 10 was at 3 LPM. LVN 2 verified the physician order and stated the O2 level should be at 2 LPM, as per physician's order. LVN 2 stated the physician's order was not followed. On March 13, 2024, at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-14 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolated
    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure for one of 44 residents (Resident 37), the call light was working. This failure had the potential to result in the delay in answering the call light which could affect the delivery of care for Resident 37. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on March 11, 2024, at 11:55 a.m., with Resident 37, Resident 37 was seen lying across the bed in a supine (face up) position. Resident 37 was observed calling out for assistance. Resident 37 stated he was not able to get up on his own. Resident 37 stated he was not using the call light because it was not working. Resident stated the call light had been broken since he was placed in his room. A staff member was called to assist Resident 37. During a concurrent observation and interview on March 11, 2024, at 11:57 a.m., with Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) 4, CNA 4 assisted Resident 37 to get up and sit on the side of the bed. CNA 4 verified the call light for Resident 37 was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-09 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed, for one of three residents reviewed (Resident 1), to provide a written notification to the Office of the State Long Term Care (LTC) Ombudsman, of the plan to transfer a resident to a general acute care hospital (GACH), on December 11, 2023. This failure has the potential for Resident 1 to not have access to an advocate at the Office of the State LTC Ombudsman. Findings: On February 1, 2024, Resident 1's record was reviewed. Resident 1 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including schizoaffective disorder, bipolar type (A mental illness that may include delusions, hallucinations, disorganized speech, disorganized behavior, and diminished emotional expressions). The document titled, Discharge Summary, dated December 14, 2023, indicated, .Resident found by social worker slumped over in wheelchair and not responding to verbal, or physical stimuli. Resident transferred to bed and assessed . Resident send out for further care. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-04 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure for one of five residents reviewed (Resident 1), to develop and implement care plans with appropriate interventions to address Resident 1 ' s post-fall major injuries. This failure had the potential for a delay in treatment of possible complications related to injuries. Findings: On December 5, 2023, at 8:39 a.m., an observation was conducted with Resident 1. Resident 1 was in bed asleep and was observed wearing a splint (supportive device) to the right arm. On December 5, 2023, at 9:30 a.m., an interview was conducted with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 2. CNA 2 stated she was the nurse assigned to render care to Resident 1 during the morning shift of December 5, 2023. CNA 2 stated there were no precautions or care necessary for Resident 1's right arm splint. CNA 2 stated special care needs that were required to provide care to residents assigned were not relayed from one shift to another. On December 5, 2023, at 10:45 a.m., and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-04 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the as needed (PRN) order for Ativan (anti-anxiety medication) for one of three sampled residents (Resident 3) was limited to 14 days. In addition,the facility failed to ensure Resident 3's behavior of anxiety was evaluated and monitored prior to obtaining a PRN Ativan order. This failure has the potential for unnecessary medication use. Findings: On December 5, 2023, an unannounced visit was conducted at the facility to investigate a complaint allegation. On December 5, 2023, at 10:04 a.m., an observation was conducted with Resident 3. Resident 3 was alert and ambulating independently. Resident 3 appeared calm, with no signs of agitation. On December 5, 2023, at 12:26 p.m., a concurrent interview and record review was conducted with Registered Nurse (RN) 1. Resident 3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included schizophrenia (serious mental illness) and anxiety (serious mental illness). The physician ' s…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-01 · tag F0626 — isolated
    Permit a resident to return to the nursing home after hospitalization or therapeutic leave that exceeds bed-hold policy.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to readmit one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) after hospitalization. This failure had the potential to cause emotional distress to Resident 1 and her responsible person (RP). Findings: On October 31, 2023, at 10:05 a.m., a telephone interview was conducted with the General Acute Care Hospital (GACH) Social Worker (HSW). The HSW stated Resident 1 was sent to the GACH for behavioral concerns, was diagnosed with a urinary tract infection (UTI- infection of the urine which can cause behavior issues), was treated and ready to be discharged back to the facility. The HSW stated the facility refused re-admission and the GACH was told Resident 1 was not appropriate to return to the facility. The HSW stated Resident 1 was not having any further behavior issues and was tearful stating she wanted to go home. The HSW stated Resident 1 had resided at the facility for a couple of years and considered the facility home. The HSW stated Resident 1 was still on the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-28 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure pharmaceutical services were provided to meet the needs for two of seven residents (Resident 1 and Resident 2) when: 1. The routine medication Invega Sustenna (a medication to treat schizophrenia [a mental disorder]) was not available for administration; and 2. The physician order for the administration of Furosemide (a medication to treat fluid retention and swelling) was not followed. These failures had the potential to negatively affect the health and safety of Residents 1 and 2. Findings: 1. On November 8 and 9, 2023, an unannounced visit was conducted for the investigation of two facility reported incidents. During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included paranoid schizophrenia (a type of schizophrenia where a person feels suspicious of other people). During a review of the Order Listing Report (OLR), dated November 8, 2023,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$33,540 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

  • $33,540 — penalty dated 2023-11-28

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
BERCOVICH, EZEQUIELIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF100%since 01/01/2021
JANNAT, SHAHRZADIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 01/01/2021
JETTI, ANOOPIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/17/2023
NGUYEN, DEREKIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2025
BAK, ABRAHAMIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 11/13/2020
GASTWIRTH, MENACHEMIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 11/13/2020

CMS files one row per role, so the 10 rows in the source record cover these 6 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$8.9M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+7.3%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$373K
Related-party expense5% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 80%Medicare 16%Other / private 4%

About 80% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $373K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$455per resident / day
operating cost
$13,841per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$491per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in California
$12,167/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$15,178/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,000/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 555711. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-04-16, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next