No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Helen Bernardy Center D/P SNF

8060 Frost St, San Diego, CA 92123 · Government - Hospital district · 43 certified beds · (858) 966-5833 Medicaid only — no Medicare

Call the home — (858) 966-5833 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)
Insights

On the public record, this home looks stronger than most — but visit before you decide.

In its favor
  • a strong health-inspection score (5/5) — the hardest rating to game (though it’s ranked within its own state, not nationally)
  • no harm-level citations in the current inspection record
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

5/5
CMS overall
5 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 5 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 4 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Urgent care / clinic
3030 Childrens Way #112 · (858) 309-6270 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
7910 Frost St · (858) 560-1911 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
3548 Ashford St Ste B · (858) 569-0722 · Call to confirm hours
Park
3030 Childrens Way · (858) 966-6789 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 5 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating5★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight8.0%4.0%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder3.5%0.8%0.9%worse
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection2.0%1.2%2.0%typical
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms1.8%7.3%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.4%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury0.0%1.6%3.3%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication67.8%13.7%18.9%check this — see note marked dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers1.0%4.3%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control0.0%10.2%21.2%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table5.0%12.0%17.1%better

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

This value is several times the typical-state benchmark. It can be real, or it can be a coding artifact in what the facility submitted. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

0.36U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.13hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.23hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.36 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 60% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 0% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNFnot reported — This nursing home is not required to submit data for the Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNFnot reported — This nursing home is not required to submit data for the Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — This nursing home is not required to submit data for the Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — This nursing home is not required to submit data for the Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — This nursing home is not required to submit data for the Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identifiednot reported — This nursing home is not required to submit data for the Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program.
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — This nursing home is not required to submit data for the Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — This nursing home is not required to submit data for the Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF staynot reported — This nursing home is not required to submit data for the Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program.
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsenednot reported — This nursing home is not required to submit data for the Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program.
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — This nursing home is not required to submit data for the Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFsnot reported — This nursing home is not required to submit data for the Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program.

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

3.27
RN hours/ resident / day
1.36
LPN hours/ resident / day
3.27
Aide hours/ resident / day
7.89
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
3.09
RN hoursweekends
Total nursing turnover
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 43 beds and averages 33.7 residents a day — about 78% occupied, or roughly 9 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 7.89 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 3.27 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.27 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 7.32 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 8.12 on weekdays — 10% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 3.34 to 3.09 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

3
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-03-11)
5
at the previous standard inspection (2024-11-22)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

13 citations, most serious first — scroll within the box to see all.

  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-11 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility did not honor a resident's responsible party's preference for showers for one of 13 residents (Res 1).As a result, Resident 1 did not receive showers in over two years as requested by the responsible party. Findings:Per the Facility admission Record, Resident (Res) 32 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnosis that included epilepsy (a chronic neurological {brain and nerve} disorder characterized by seizures {a sudden surge of abnormal electrical activity in the brain, leading to symptoms like uncontrollable muscle jerking, staring spells, confusion, or loss of consciousness}). Res 32 was dependent on a ventilator (a life-support machine that breathes for patients unable to breathe sufficiently on their own due to illness, trauma, or surgery) and depended on staff for all activities of daily living (ADL-dressing, eating, bathing, washing and oral hygiene, mobility, and control of bladder and bowels). Res 32 is unable to move voluntarily…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-11 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's privacy and dignity were protected during personal care for one of 13 residents (Res 4). This had the potential to cause embarrassment for Res 4 by being exposed during personal care.According to the Resident admission Record, Resident 4 (Res 4) was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnosis that included cerebral palsy (a group of permanent disorders that affect movement, muscle tone, and posture, caused by abnormal brain development or brain injury) and repeated Urinary Tract Infections (UTI- common bacterial infection). Res 4 does not speak, and is dependent on staff for all Activities of Daily Living (ADL's-movement, eating, oral hygiene, dressing, transfer, change of position, and bathing). Res 4 cannot control bladder and bowels, and is changed by staff. On 3/8/26 at 1:32 P.M. CNA 12 and 13 were observed from the doorway at Res 4's room. The bed and Res 4 were visible, and a privacy curtain was pushed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-11 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to implement and maintain infection control practices when a tube feeding syringe for 1 of 13 sampled residents (22) was found hanging on the tube feeding pole and not in its plastic bag. This failure had the potential to spread bacteria to Resident 22. Per the facility admission record, Resident 22 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included gastrostomy status (placement of a plastic tube into the stomach to administer medications, nutrition and fluids). On 3/8/26 at 1:00 P.M., an observation of Resident 22's room was conducted. An inspection of Resident 22's tube feeding equipment was done and a tube feeding syringe (device used to administer medications, fluids and nutrition) was found hung on the pole and not in the plastic bag. On 3/11/26 at 11:30 A.M., an interview was conducted with the administrator and the director of nursing (DON). The DON stated it was her expectation that the tube feeding syringe be placed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-29 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure appropriate services were consistently implemented for four of four sampled residents (Resident 1, 2, 3, and 4) when: 1) care plans were not followed 2) the Interdisciplinary Team (IDT) recommendation was not followed 3) care plan was not updated/revised As a result, there was a potential for the residents ' overall care and health to be negatively impacted. Findings: 1a)Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included cerebral palsy (a group of conditions that affect movement and posture) per the facility ' s face sheet. A review of records was conducted. The Physical Therapy (PT) note dated 11/22/24 indicated Resident 1 will benefit from prone [on his tummy] position under direct supervision for a minimum of 10 min, 3-4x/wk. The Multidisciplinary Summary Report dated 12/2/24 indicated the planned actions/care plan included the Clinical Activities Assistant (CAA) 1 will begin matt/tummy time per the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-11-22 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure food safety and sanitation practices were met in the kitchen according to standards of practice when: 1. Two (2) floor sinks had piping without an air gap of at least 1 (inch) between the pipe and drain. 2. Three (3) cutting boards with deep cuts and food stains were stored in the clean area. 3. Two (2) ice machines had debris inside the storage parts of the ice bin. 4. Food thermometers were not calibrated per facility policy. These failures exposed residents to unsanitary practices, which had the potential to place them at risk of developing foodborne illness. 1. During the initial kitchen tour conducted on 11/19/24 at 8:44 A.M., a floor sink drain next to the salad prep/catering area was observed with the PVC (polyvinyl chloride) white pipe extending into the floor drain. Also, a brown pipe that extended from a walk-in freezer was observed disconnected from the freezer door and laying directly into a floor sink drain. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-22 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set (MDS - health status screening and assessment tool) was accurately completed for 1 of 6 sampled residents (Resident 3). This failure had the potential for Resident 3 to receive inappropriate care. Findings: According to the admission and Discharge Record, Resident 3 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included cerebral palsy (a condition that affects movement and posture) and traumatic brain injury (damage to the brain caused by an outside force). During a record review for Resident 3, the Nursing Communication indicated, During the day, CIC [Intermittent Catheterization, a procedure where a tube is inserted into the bladder to drain urine) .Foley (foley catheterization, a tube is inserted to drain urine and is left in) for continuous drainage from 8pm to 8am . During a record review for Resident 3, the MDS dated [DATE] Section H- Bladder and Bowel indicated .C. Ostomy (including urostomy, ileostomy, and colostomy).…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-22 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to revise a comprehensive care plan for intermittent and indwelling catheterization (a procedure where a tube is inserted to remove urine from the bladder) for one of six sampled residents (Resident 3). This failure had the potential for Resident 3 to have negative clinical outcomes. Findings: A review of the facility's admission and Discharge Record indicated Resident 3 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included cerebral palsy (abnormal brain development causing a disorder of movement, muscle tone or posture), and severe developmental delay. A review of Resident 3's medical record indicated, Insert foley overnight from 8pm to 8am, prior to removal at 8am please instill gent [SIC] irrigation solution through connector to foley bag, allow to drain via void. Use sterile or clean technique with alcohol swabs to the attaching ends . and .During the day, CIC [SIC] at 1400 with gentamicin flushes (8am and 1400). Foley at night for continuous drainage…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-22 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to upload the Minimum Data Set (MDS) for three of three residents (59, 63, 66) within an appropriate time frame. This failure had the potential of not having the residents not receiving the appropriate care. Findings: During an interview with the Program Manager (PM) 11/21/24 at 3:34 P.M., the PM stated the Minimum Data Set (MDS, a standardized tool to identify a resident's health needs and strengths to develop an individualized care plan) was used to create care plans. The PM stated the MDS needed to be accurate to ensure the residents were getting the appropriate care. During an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) 11/22/24 at 1:37 P.M., the DON stated the expectation is to have documentation completed the same shift. The DON further stated .a reasonable time frame for loading it [the MDS assessment] into EPIC [the electronic health record] would be within the week. Months would not be acceptable. During a review of Resident 59's electronic…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-22 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow infection control practices when a licensed nurse did not perform hand hygiene after administering medications via gastrostomy tube (GT- a tube inserted directly into the stomach used to provide nutrition and medication) and before doing tracheostomy (a surgical opening created through the neck to help someone breathe) site care to one of five residents observed for medication pass. As a result, there was the potential for cross contamination of microorganisms (bacteria, virus, fungus). Findings: According to the admission and Discharge Record, Resident 115 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included cerebral palsy (a condition that affects movement and posture), gastrostomy tube dependent, and chronic lung disease. On 11/22/24 at 7:53 A.M., a medication administration observation was conducted with Licensed Nurse (LN) 1. LN 1 was observed administering medications to Resident 115 via GT. After all the medications were…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-10-20 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure: 1. All controlled medications/drugs (medications/drugs with a potential for addiction and abuse) were stored separately in locked, permanently affixed compartments for storage of controlled drugs when three out of six medication carts had controlled medications stored among the non-controlled medications. 2. A medication cart located inside the medication room, containing controlled medications, was locked. As a result of this deficient practice, a controlled medication was unaccounted for. In addition, there was the potential for drug diversion (unauthorized distribution of controlled drugs for purposes not intended by the prescriber). Findings: On 10/18/23 at 3:23 P.M., a medication administration was observed with licensed nurse (LN) 1. LN 1 prepared a resident's medication at the medication cart. Phenobarbital (a controlled drug) was stored inside the medication cart's main compartment among non-controlled medications. On 10/19/23 at 8:51 A.M., a medication administration was observed with LN 2.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-20 · tag F0732 — isolated
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to post the federally required daily actual hours worked by the staff in an area accessible to the public when the information was not posted until the last shift for the day clocked in. As a result, the actual hours worked by the staff was not readily accessible to residents, family, or visitors. Finding: On 10/19/23 at 11:36 A.M., the staffing posting was reviewed, the only information posted at this time were yesterday's staffing hours. The unit clerk was responsible for completing the form. The unit clerk stated the staffing is actual, not projected and, is only posted after all shifts for the day have signed in. She stated the posting visible today are yesterday's numbers and the the posting was not current.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-20 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure: 1. All controlled drugs (medications/drugs with a potential for addiction and abuse) were reconcilled and accounted for. 2. Licensed Nurse (LN) 4 safeguarded a resident's medications during the medication administration when the LN left the resident's dispensed medications unattended in the hallway. As a result of these deficient practices, the facility could not provide an accurate accounting of all controlled medications and there was a potential for controlled drug diversion (unauthorized distribution of controlled drugs for purposes not intended by the prescriber). In addition, unattended medication had the potential to be tampered with and not administered as intended. Findings: 1. On 10/19/23 at 8:51 A.M., an observation of a medication administration was observed with LN 2. Two bottles (for Resident 65) of liquid Diazepam (a controlled medication) were kept inside the medication cart and were stored in the main medication drawer. One 150 milliliter (ml) bottle of Diazepam had a facility…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-20 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that one of 12 sampled residents (Resident 4) was free from unnecessary psychotropic medications (medications affecting mood, thoughts, and behavior) when the resident had been prescribed Trazodone (a medication used to treat major depressive disorder, a serious mood disorder affecting how a person thinks and feels) for sleep which was a non-FDA approved indication for use. This deficient practice had the potential to cause the resident harm. Findings: A review of Resident 4's admission and Discharge Record indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. A review of Resident 4's Annual History and Physical (H&P) dated 5/1/23, indicated the resident received Trazodone 50 milligrams (mg) nightly. The H&P listed Resident 4's active diagnoses. Resident 4 did not have a diagnosis of insomnia (inability to sleep) or major depressive disorder. A review of Resident 4's physician's order dated 1/16/20, indicated, Trazodone (Desyrel) tablet…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
Ownership Data Not Available

The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

What families pay in CA

Paying with Medicaid

CMS lists this home as Medicaid-certified only — it can accept Medicaid for long-term care, but it is not Medicare-certified, so Medicare will not pay for a short rehabilitation (“skilled nursing”) stay here. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in California
$12,167/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$15,178/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,000/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 05A292. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-03-11, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next