St. Pauls Health Care Center
235 Nutmeg Street, San Diego, CA 92103 · Non profit - Corporation · 59 certified beds · (619) 239-8687 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
- CMS has flagged it for abuse
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited May 2026
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565)
- it has 1 actual-harm citation
- a high number of inspection citations overall (58) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $44,890 in federal fines (most recent 2026-05-11)
- its payroll-based staffing score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
- nursing-staff turnover (62%) runs well above the national median (45%)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 4 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 3 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's staffing rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the staffing score rests on the facility's own payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 3 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 2 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 3 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 8.0% | 10.2% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 0.8% | 4.0% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.8% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 4.2% | 1.2% | 2.0% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 0.0% | 7.3% | 6.5% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.4% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 0.0% | 1.6% | 3.3% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 8.7% | 9.8% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 1.6% | 13.7% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 97.7% | 98.2% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 3.4% | 4.3% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 8.8% | 10.2% | 21.2% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 14.6% | 12.0% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 4.0% | 1.5% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 94.8% | 93.2% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 22.6% | 23.0% | 22.6% | typical |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 27.5% | 11.2% | 12.0% | worse |
* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
51.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 65 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 61.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 21 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.37 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 62% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 26% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 51.0%CMS range 41.0–60.2 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.6%CMS range 6.7–16.3 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 61.9% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 42.9% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 47.6% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 95.5% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 4.5% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 6.5%CMS range 3.7–13.1 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.89 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 59 beds and averages 53.4 residents a day — about 91% occupied, or roughly 6 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.78 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.93 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.96 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.34 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.96 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.06 to 0.61 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 62% is well above the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
58 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 47 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2026-05-11 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of three residents (Resident 1) was free from physical abuse when:Certified nursing assistant (CNA) 6 did not respect Resident 1's request for CNA 6 to stop touching her and to get out of her room.CNA 6 was assigned to provide care to Resident 1 after the resident had a prior complaint regarding CNA 6 and did not want the CNA as a caregiver.The facility received multiple complaints from residents regarding CNA 6's provision of care. The facility did not implement increased supervision of CNA 6 while providing resident care.As a result of these deficient practices:Resident 1 defended herself by grabbing CNA 6's hair to make her stop. CNA 6 attempted to remove the resident's hand causing a skin tear to the resident's left upper arm.Resident 1 felt attacked by CNA 6 and that she had to fight for her life. Resident 1 experienced anxiety and fear after the incident.Resident 1 was prescribed an antibiotic (medication to treat…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-11 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop an individualized written care plan for one of three residents (Resident 1) that addressed Resident 1's preference not to have care provided by certified nursing assistant (CNA) 6 after the resident made a complaint about CNA 6.This deficient practice had the potential to cause distress to Resident 1. Cross reference F 600.Findings:A review of Resident 1's Face Sheet, indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include generalized muscle weakness, right eye blindness, unspecified urinary incontinence, and mild dementia.A review of the facility's Employee Counseling/Disciplinary Notice Form for CNA 6 related to a previous incident involving Resident 1, dated 4/16/24, indicated, .Family [Resident 1's family] complaint regarding patient care [provided by CNA 6], being rude and attitude.Expected improvement: The violations mentioned above is unacceptable and will not be allowed to continue now or in the future.The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-11 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the comprehensive assessment and care plan were followed for one of three residents (Resident 1).As a result, Resident 1's activities of daily living (ADL) care was not provided in a manner that was consistent with her minimum data set assessment (MDS-a comprehensive assessment tool) and written ADL care plan. This had the potential to risk the resident's safety and to cause discomfort.Findings: A review of Resident 1's Face Sheet, indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include generalized muscle weakness, right eye blindness, unspecified urinary incontinence, and mild dementia.A review of Resident 1's minimum data set assessment (MDS, a comprehensive assessment tool), section GG, with Assessment Reference Date of 2/16/26, indicated the resident required substantial/maximal assistance from staff for personal hygiene and upper body dressing, and the resident was dependent on staff to provide toileting…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-02-07 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — patternProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure effective monitoring, and evaluation of nutritional and hydration needs for 2 of 3 sampled Residents (Resident 2 and Resident 3).1.) Resident 2 experienced a change in oral intake when he was observed pocketing his food (holding food inside the mouth, without chewing or swallowing). The RD did not reassess Resident 2 to determine appropriate interventions, the IDT (IDT- an interdisciplinary team comprised of professionals from various disciplines who work in collaboration to address a resident with multiple physical and psychological needs) did not address Resident 2's change in dietary needs and possible risks to Resident 2's health. Resident 2's care plan did not reflect the pocketing food nor interventions were implemented.2.) Resident 3 experienced poor intake of food and fluids and was determined to be at higher risk for dehydration (the loss of water and electrolytes from the body that prevents it from functioning normally).…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-07 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents rights were honored for one of three sampled residents (Resident 5), when the facility asked Resident 5's representative to sign a waiver in response to missing dentures.This failure caused Resident 5 to experience delay in having her lost dentures replaced and had the potential for Resident 5's property to not be safeguarded against loss, theft, or misappropriation.Findings:Resident 5's record was reviewed. According to the Face Sheet, Resident 5 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included dementia (the loss of cognitive functions such as thinking, remembering, and reasoning) and dysphagia (difficulty swallowing). According to the Minimum Data Set (MDS- a federally mandated assessment tool) dated 12/2/25, Resident 5 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS- a tool to assess cognition, or thinking skills) of 3, which indicated Resident 5 had severe cognitive impairment.During a concurrent interview and record review with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-07 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure oral care/dentures were provided prior to serving breakfast to one of three sampled residents (Resident 1).This failure had the potential for Resident 1 to experience health complications including choking, aspiration (food enters airway and lungs).Findings:During a record review on 2/7/26, the Face Sheet indicated Resident 1 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included dysphagia (difficulty swallowing) following a cerebral infarction (a stroke) and type 2 diabetes.During a record review on 2/7/26, the Minimum Data Set (MDS- a federally mandated assessment tool) indicated Resident 1 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS- a tool to assess cognition, or mental processes) of 8, which indicated severe cognitive impairment. The MDS further indicated Resident 1 required substantial assistance with oral hygiene.During a record review on 2/7/26, Resident 1's Physician's Order indicated, Dependent with all meals.On 2/7/26 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-09 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record review the facility failed to provide a homelike environment for two of four sampled residents (Resident 1 and 2), when it did not maintain a comfortable temperature in one resident room.This failure had the potential to make residents uncomfortable.Findings:Record review of Face Sheet indicated Resident 1 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included: Dementia (severe cognitive decline affecting memory, thinking, language, and daily function, caused by damaged brain cells), Alzheimer's Disease (a progressive brain disorder, the most common form of dementia, causing severe memory loss, thinking, and behavioral problems that interfere with daily life), and Muscle Weakness.Record review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS-assessment tool used in nursing homes) section C, Cognitive Patterns indicated a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 3 indicating Resident 1 has severe cognitive impairment.Record review of Face Sheet indicated Resident 2 was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-04 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one sampled resident (1) received continence care in accordance with professional standards, when staff applied two incontinence briefs improperly with the inner brief folded and a hole cut in the center through which the penis protruded.This failure resulted in swelling and pain for Resident 1 that required hospital evaluation and caused psychosocial harm related to embarrassment.Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of prostatic hyperplasia with lower urinary tract symptoms (and enlarged prostate that can block urine flow) and obstructive and reflux uropathy (urine blocked from leaving the body that flows backwards into the kidney) per the facility face sheet. A review of Resident 1's change in condition form, signed 8/3/25 at 12:37 P.M., by licensed nurse (LN) 1, indicated, .Swollen head of penis caused by double briefing of resident by CNA on NOC shift. A small hole was cut into secondary brief and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-09-04 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolatedEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure nursing staff were competent to provide continence care for 1 of 1 sampled residents (1) when competency validation records were not maintained for a night shift (NOC) certified nursing assistant (NOC CNA) from registry (a staffing agency) who was identified in the facility's internal investigation as having improperly applied incontinence briefs. This failure resulted in registry staff providing care without verified competency, which contributed to improper continence care, swelling, pain and psychosocial harm requiring hospital evaluation for Resident 1. Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of prostatic hyperplasia with lower urinary tract symptoms (and enlarged prostate that can block urine flow) and obstructive and reflux uropathy (urine blocked from leaving the body that flows backwards into the kidney) per the facility face sheet.A review of Resident 1's change in condition form, signed 8/3/25 at 12:37 P.M., by…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-06-26 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — patternHonor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide a response and rationale for the Resident Council grievances and suggestions. This failure resulted in the members of the Resident Council voicing that their complaints were unheard, and they were afraid of retaliation from the facility if they filed a grievance. Findings: On 6/23/25 at 2:44 P.M., an interview was conducted with the Resident Council President (RCP). The RCP stated call lights issues have been frequently discussed in Resident Council and the facility is aware and don't do anything about it. The RCP stated that the Resident Council has not received any written or verbal response from the facility regarding resolution of their complaints. A review of the Resident Council minutes, dated March 27, 2025, indicated Nursing Comments: Residents voiced their concerns about the call lights not being answered in a proper time frame, called in DON [Director of Nursing] to address their concerns. No rationale or facility response was found in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-06-26 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — patternPrevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement gradual dose reductions (GDR, stepwise tapering of a medication to determine if symptoms can be managed at a lower dose) for two of five sampled residents (Residents 17 and 28) on psychotropic (affecting brain activities associated with mental processes and behavior) medications. This failure had the potential for residents to receive unnecessary psychotropic medications which can lead to side effects, such as sedation and falls. Findings: 1. A review of Resident 17's admission record indicated the resident was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including major depressive disorder (also known as depression), dementia (memory loss that gets worse over time) with behavioral disturbances, and anxiety disorder. Resident 17 had a physician's order, dated 2/1/25, for Seroquel (brand name for quetiapine, an antipsychotic medication to treat mental illness) 25 milligrams (mg) by mouth daily at bedtime for agitation, anxiety, dementia, and behavioral…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 47 citations
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-26 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2c. A review of Resident 50's admission record indicated the resident was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including hemiplegia (paralysis on one side of the body) following cerebral infarction (a type of stroke). Resident 50 had a physician's order, dated 6/12/25, for enoxaparin (generic for Lovenox, an anticoagulant) 40 milligrams (mg) injected under the skin every morning for deep vein thrombosis (DVT, life-threatening blood clots in the legs) prevention. During a concurrent interview and record review on 6/25/25 at 11:03 A.M. with Licensed Nurse 1 (LN 1), Resident 50's anticoagulant care plan, dated 5/6/25, was reviewed. The care plan indicated Resident is at risk for active bleeding [due to] use of anticoagulant meds. The care plan further indicated Observe for S/S [signs and symptoms] of bleeding (bleeding gums, epistaxis [nosebleed], hematemesis [vomiting blood] and report. LVN 1 stated she did not see any documentation in Resident 50's medical record that Resident 50 was monitored for signs of bleeding.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-26 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide proper pharmaceutical services when: 1. The documentation on Controlled Drug Record (CDR) and Medication Administration Record (MAR) did not reconcile for two of three randomly selected residents (Resident 23 and 45). This failure had the potential for diversion and/or inadequate pain management. 2. The facility did not verify the accuracy of outside medications for three residents (Resident 9, 25, and 306). This failure had the potential for inaccurate medications to be administered to the residents. 3. The medication storage room and its refrigerator temperature logs were missing entries. This failure had the potential for undetected inappropriate temperature storage which could alter the efficacy of medications. Findings: 1a. A review of Resident 23's admission record indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis including polyneuropathy (damage or disease affecting peripheral nerves) and pain in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-06-26 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — patternEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to respond to the consultant pharmacist's monthly medication regimen review (MRR) recommendations for two of five sampled residents (Residents 17 and 28). This failure had the potential for unaddressed medication irregularities and inadequately monitored medications. Findings: 1. A review of Resident 17's admission record indicated the resident was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including major depressive disorder (also known as depression), dementia (memory loss that gets worse over time) with behavioral disturbances, and anxiety disorder. Resident 17 had physician's orders for the following medications: - Mirtazapine (generic for Remeron, a medication to treat depression) 15 milligrams (mg) by mouth daily at bedtime for major depressive disorder, dated 10/30/24; - Effexor XR (brand name for venlafaxine, a medication to treat depression) 75 mg by mouth every morning for major depressive disorder, dated 10/30/24; - Lorazepam (generic for Ativan, a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-06-26 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — patternEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure four sampled residents (Residents 50, 32, 13, and 3) were free of unnecessary medications when: 1. Residents 50, 13, and 3 received anticoagulant (blood thinner) medications without staff monitoring for signs and symptoms of side effects; and 2. Resident 32 received an inappropriate dose of insulin and was not monitored for hypoglycemic (low blood sugar) side effects. These deficiencies had the potential to cause harm due to lack of monitoring for negative side effects of anticoagulant therapy, including excessive bleeding or bruising, and hypoglycemic side effects, including hunger, profuse sweating and tremors. Findings: 1a. A review of Resident 50's admission record indicated the resident was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including hemiplegia (paralysis on one side of the body) following cerebral infarction (a type of stroke). Resident 50 had a physician's order, dated 6/12/25, for enoxaparin (generic for Lovenox, an anticoagulant) 40…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-26 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications/biologicals were labeled and stored according to acceptable standards of practice when: 1. Medication and medication Vials were stored opened and undated. 2. There were expired vials and medications stored in medication carts and the medication storage room. 3. Medications in the medication room and medication refrigerator were not stored in the acceptable range of temperatures. 4. An unauthorized facility staff had access to the medications in the medication room. These failures had the potential for medications to be ineffective and potentially harmful to residents. In addition, the medications were not stored securely from unauthorized access. Findings: 1. On 6/23/25 at 8:41 A.M., a concurrent observation of the medication storage room and interview with Licensed Nurse (LN) 12 was conducted. The refrigerator in the room was observed. The refrigerator contained one open vial of tuberculin, purified protein derivative…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-26 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow appropriate infection prevention and control practices when: 1. A nurse did not disinfect the rubber seal (the point of connection between the needle and the body of the pen) of a multi-dose insulin pen while preparing the medication for one resident. 2. A nurse did not clean the blood pressure machine after it was used for one resident. 3. Expired and opened intravenous (IV, into the vein) access supplies and wound treatment supplies were not removed from the carts. 4a. Staff did not provide an opportunity for hand hygiene for 12 residents (Resident 44, 6, 10, 309, 7, 24, 29, 23, 16, 47, 12, 255) before eating lunch. 4b. Two staff did not wash their hands after leaving an isolation room where a Resident (308) was positive for Clostridium difficile (C-diff, a bacteria that causes infectious diarrhea). 5. Urinary catheter bags for two Residents (28 and 51) were laying on the floor. 6. Both shower rooms (north and south) and a shower…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-26 · tag F0552 — isolatedEnsure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to have a physician obtain informed consent (process in which a health care provider educates a patient about the risks, benefits, and alternatives of an intervention in order to obtain agreement or permission for care) for two of five sampled residents (Residents 17 and 28) on psychotropic (affecting brain activities associated with mental processes and behavior) medications. This failure had the potential for residents or their representatives to not be fully informed of the risks and benefits of psychotropic medications before receiving treatment. Findings: 1. A review of Resident 17's admission record indicated the resident was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including major depressive disorder (also known as depression), dementia (memory loss that gets worse over time) with behavioral disturbances, and anxiety disorder. Resident 17 had physician's orders for the following psychotropic medications: - Mirtazapine (generic for Remeron, a medication to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-26 · tag F0557 — isolatedHonor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's (Resident 13) personal property (a jar of grape jelly) was treated with dignity and respect when the facility did not communicate the food storage policy to the resident prior to disposal of their property. This deficiency violated Resident 13's rights for dignity and respect. Findings: A review of Resident 13's Face Sheet indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. On 6/23/25 at 11:30 A.M., an interview was conducted with Resident 13. Resident 13 stated she was informed earlier this morning by the nurse that her personal food item (jar of jelly) had been thrown away. Resident 13 stated it was a gift from her friend and she was very upset and angry that it had been thrown away. Resident 13 stated she had not been informed of a policy for how long a food item could be kept in the facility's resident refrigerator or when it would be thrown out. On 6/24/25 at 10 A.M., an interview was conducted with the Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-26 · tag F0628 — isolatedProvide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete a discharge summary for one of three residents (Resident 5) during a closed record review. This failure had the potential for the receiving facility to not receive accurate and timely medical information regarding Resident 5's health status and needs. Findings: A review of Resident 5's Face Sheet indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was discharged from the facility on 6/11/25 with diagnoses to include acquired absence of the left leg below the knee, acquired absence of the right toes, bipolar disorder (characterized by episodes of mood swings), dementia (group of conditions characterized by cognitive impairment and memory loss), dysphagia (difficulty swallowing) and difficulty walking. A review of Resident 5's Wound assessment dated [DATE], indicated the resident had a facility acquired wound to the lateral side of his right foot that measured three by two centimeters and was 100 % covered by necrotic tissue. A…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-26 · tag F0659 — isolatedProvide care by qualified persons according to each resident's written plan of care.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure nursing staff fed one of 12 residents (Resident 29) who required feeding assistance. As a result of this deficient practice, Resident 29 received feeding assistance from the Activity Coordinator (AC) who was not qualified. The resident could have experienced choking and was at risk for aspiration. (cross reference F689) Findings: Per facility's Face Sheet Resident 29 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with a diagnosis of Parkinsonism (a progressive disease of the nervous system marked by tremor, muscular rigidity, and slow, imprecise movements) and Dysphagia (difficulty swallowing). On 6/23/25 at 11:45 A.M, an observation was conducted in the dining room. Resident 29 was observed receiving feeding assistance from the Activities Coordinator (AC). Resident 29's meal consisted of pureed (blended) food. On 6/24/25 at 2:27 P.M., a concurrent interview and record review was conducted with Licensed Nurse (LN) 15. LN 15 reviewed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-26 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that one (Resident 28) of two sampled resident's Low Air Loss (LAL) mattress was functioning properly. This failure had the potential for Resident 28 to experience skin breakdown and develop pressure ulcers. Findings: A review of Resident 28's Face Sheet, dated [DATE], indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of Peripheral Vascular Disease (PVD, a condition where blood flow can be limited to the lower part of the body). A review of Resident 28's care plan, dated [DATE], indicated At risk for skin breakdown .LAL mattress in place . A review of Resident 28's physician orders, dated [DATE], indicated Low air loss mattress .Frequency (Scheduled): Three times Daily .monitor placement & that mattress is functioning properly A review of Resident 28's Braden scale for predicting pressure sore risk, dated [DATE], indicated the resident was a moderate risk for developing pressure sores. On [DATE] at 8:12…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-26 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure two of four Residents (3, 17) that were reviewed received Restorative Nursing Assistant (RNA) services as ordered by the physician. As a result, Resident 3 and Resident 17 had the potential to experience a further decline in range of motion (ROM). Findings: A review of Resident 3's Face Sheet, indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of muscle weakness and dementia (a condition that affects memory). A review of Resident 17's Face Sheet, indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of fracture to the lower end of right femur and fracture of right pubis and dementia. A review of Resident 3's physician orders, dated 5/24/25, indicated .RNA for BLE [Bilateral lower extremity] ROM 3x/week to improve ROM and muscle tissue extensibility A review of Resident 17's physician orders, dated 4/29/25, indicated .RNA for UB [upper body] ROM 5 x week A review of the Residents (3 and 17) RNA…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-26 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one sampled resident (Resident 29) was provided a safe and physician ordered snack when the Activity Coordinator (AC) gave the resident baby teething crackers. As a result of this deficient practice, Resident 29 could have experienced choking and was at risk for aspiration. (cross reference F659) Findings: Per facility's Face Sheet Resident 29 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with a diagnosis of Parkinsonism (a progressive disease of the nervous system marked by tremor, muscular rigidity, and slow, imprecise movements) and Dysphagia (difficulty swallowing). On 6/25/25, a record review was conducted. A review of Resident 29's Speech Note dated 5/14/25 indicated, .1:1[one staff to one resident] CNA [certified nursing assistant] to provide cues for slow pace, small bites/sips, and for upright positioning . A review of Resident 29's Physician Order Sheet dated 3/14/25 indicated, Diet order fortified large portions, pureed, nectar thick…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-26 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure 4 of 37 administered medications were given in accordance with the physician orders and manufacturer's instructions for two of six residents (Resident 33 and 50). This failure resulted in a 10.81% medication error rate and the potential to affect resident safety and medication effectiveness. Findings: 1. On 6/23/25 at 10:37 A.M., a medication administration observation was conducted with Licensed Nurse (LN) 13. LN 13 prepared, dispensed, and administered 10 medications for Resident 33, including one tablet of cranberry (a supplement) 450 milligrams (mg), one capsule of potassium chloride (a medication to treat low potassium levels) 10 milliequivalents (mEq, a unit of measurement), and one drop of Refresh Classic (to treat dry eyes)1.4 - 0.6 % into each eye. A review of Resident 33's physician order was conducted. The record indicated LN 13 did not follow physician's orders during Resident 33's medication administration observation for the listed medications: - Cranberry 450mg tablet, take two tablets…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-26 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolatedProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food safety in dietary services were maintained for food storage according to standards of practice when the facility did not ensure the dry food storage room and two of three refrigerator (Unit 2 and Unit 6)temperatures were monitored consistently. These failures had the potential to cause food borne illness among the residents who received food from the kitchen. Findings: During the initial kitchen tour on 6/23/25 at 7:43 A.M., an interview and observation was conducted with the Kitchen Manager (KM) and Registered Dietician (RD). The dry food storage room did not have a thermometer to measure temperature. The KM stated the dry food storage room temperature should have had a thermometer to measure the room temperature. The KM retrieved a thermometer and placed it in the dry food storage room. The KM stated temperatures in the dry food storage room should have been monitored and documented daily to ensure the quality and safety of the food. Two refrigerators (Unit 2 and Unit 6) had written temperature…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-26 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — isolatedHave a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to identify and develop an ongoing QAPI (Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement) plan related to medication storage. (Cross reference F761) This failure had the potential for residents to receive expired medications and supplies. Findings: On 6/26/25 at 4:53 P.M., an interview was conducted with the Director of Nursing (DON), Chief Operating Officer (COO) and Minimum Data Set (MDS) Coordinator. The DON and COO stated that the QAPI committee should have identified medication storage as an ongoing project. A review of the facility's policy titled Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) Program, review dated 2/2025, .to provide a means to measure current and potential indicators for outcomes of care and quality of life .to provide a means to establish and implement performance improvement projects to correct identified negative or problematic indicators
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-10 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — patternEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to prevent multiple significant medication errors when oxycodone/apap (a narcotic pain medication mixed with acetaminophen, also known as Percocet) was administered to one sampled resident (Resident 1), nine times without a physician's order. As a result, Resident 1 was placed at risk for serious adverse drug effects including, oversedation, respiratory depression, or medication interaction, due to repeated administration of a controlled substance without physician oversight or a valid prescription. In addition, the controlled drug record (CDR) used to record the Percocet administration was handwritten and lacked essential labeling information contributing to repeated errors and broader concerns with medication labeling and storage practices. (See tag F761) Findings: Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of malignant neoplasm (a cancerous tumor) of the bone and a pathological fracture (bone break due to disease) of the left…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-10 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that controlled substances were properly labeled and stored for one of two sampled Residents (1) during a medication cart audit when: 1. The facility did not remove discontinued controlled medications from Resident 1's active stock in the north wing medication cart 2. The facility failed to secure and label a bottle of oxycodone/apap (a narcotic pain medication mixed with acetaminophen, also known as Percocet) brought into the facility by Resident 1 which allowed the narcotic to remain in the medication cart and be administered without a valid physician's order (PO, see F760). As a result, resident 1 was given an unprescribed narcotic and was placed at increased risk for administration of additional discontinued unprescribed narcotics due to improper labeling and storage. Findings: Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of malignant neoplasm (a cancerous tumor) of the bone and a pathological fracture (bone…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-03 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to notify the attending physician of an abuse allegation for one of two sampled residents (Resident 1) reviewed for abuse. As a result, the attending physician was not aware of the abuse allegation placing Resident 1 at risk for further abuse. In addition, there was a potential for Resident 1 to not have appropriate safe interventions and physician evaluation. Findings: On 5/20/25 at 8:30 A.M., an unannounced onsite visit at the facility was conducted related to an abuse allegation. Resident 1 (R1) was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including [NAME] cell carcinoma (skin cancer) according to the facility's Face Sheet. During an observation and interview on 5/20/25 at 8:32 A.M. with Resident 1, Resident 1 was in bed leaning towards the left side of the bed near the bed rail. Resident 1 stated he had a concern with certified nurse assistant (CNA) 3. Resident 1 stated CNA 3 was, Rough while turning him in bed. During an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-03 · tag F0836 — isolatedEnsure the facility is licensed under applicable State and local law and operates and provides services in compliance with all applicable Federal, State, and local laws, regulations, and codes, and with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to comply with the current state regulation on maintaining a complete information as to past employment and qualifications. As a result, the facility had no record of employees' past employment history or references and qualifications. Findings: On 5/20/25 at 8:30 A.M., an unannounced onsite visit at the facility was conducted related to an abuse allegation. Resident 1 (R1) was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including [NAME] cell carcinoma (skin cancer) according to the facility's Face Sheet. During an interview on 5/20/25 at 8:32 A.M. with R1, R1 stated he had concerns regarding certified nurse assistant (CNA) 3. An interview was conducted on 5/20/25 at 10:25 A.M. with the Director of Nursing (DON). The DON stated CNA 3 had been employed by the facility since 11/21/2000. The DON stated she checked CNA 3's file and did not find a reference check prior to CNA 3's employment. The DON further stated that the human resources [HR- the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-02 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to correctly administer a wound treatment medication for one of four sampled residents reviewed for medication errors (Resident 1). As a result, wrong wound treatment medication was administered. In addition, this failure has the potential to delay Resident 1 ' s wound healing. Findings: On 5/2/25 at 8:30 A.M., an unannounced onsite visit at the facility was conducted related to treatment medication error. Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including bullous pemphigoid (a rare skin condition that causes large fluid-filled blisters) according to the facility ' s Face Sheet. During an observation and interview on 5/2/26 at 8:44 A.M. with Resident 1, Resident 1 was observed in bed with a dressing on his right arm, close to Resident 1 ' s elbow. Resident 1 stated he had a wound on the right arm, and it was not getting better. Resident 1 stated a nurse administered the incorrect medication on his right arm wound. During a review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-20 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to complete post fall assessments and resident centered fall preventive measures for four of four residents reviewed for complete resident records. (Residents 1, 2, 3 and 4) This failure had the potential for residents to have repeated fall incidents. Findings: 1. Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including unspecified abnormalities of gait and mobility according to the facility's Face Sheet. During an observation and interview on 6/13/24, at 9:01 A.M. with Resident 1, Resident 1 stated she returned to the facility from the hospital because she fell. Resident 1 stated she did not remember how and where she fell but stated she broke her hip and was pointing on the left hip. A review of Resident 1's Clinical Notes Report, dated 6/7/24 at 7:23 A.M. a Licensed Nurse documented, .resident was found on the floor of the entryway to her room . An interview with Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) 1 was conducted on 6/13/24,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-04-07 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. A review of Resident 21's admission Record indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Wegener's Granulomatosis with renal involvement (a rare blood vessel disease that can cause symptoms in the kidneys) and long term current use of anticoagulants (a blood thinning medication). On 4/4/23 at 3:15 P.M., an observation and interview were conducted with Resident 21. Resident 21 was in bed, on a low air loss mattress (a mattress designed to prevent and treat pressure wounds). Resident 21 was noted to have dark purple bruising from her elbow to her hand on her right side. Resident 21 had areas of redness on her mid forearm and two locations with steri-strips on her right side. Resident 21 was noted to have dark purple bruising from her wrist to her knuckles on her left side. Resident 21 stated that her skin was delicate and that staff needed to be extra careful and gentle when caring for her. On 4/7/23 at 8:29 A.M., an interview and concurrent record review was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-04-07 · tag F0741 — failed to have staff trained for behavioral health — patternEnsure that the facility has sufficient staff members who possess the competencies and skills to meet the behavioral health needs of residents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure all nursing staff including registry staff (nursing staff provided by a staffing agency) had the necessary training and competencies (measurable pattern of knowledge, skills, abilities, and behaviors, and other characteristics to perform occupational functions successfully) to care for residents with a history of trauma and/or post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). In addition, staff providing care to Resident 2 and Resident 24 were unaware of the resident's PTSD diagnosis and history of trauma. This failure had the potential for residents with a history of trauma and/or PTSD to experience triggers and retraumatization that would compromise the residents' safety and their ability to achieve their highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. (Cross reference F699 and F838) Findings: 1. A review of Resident 2's Face Sheet indicated the resident was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include PTSD. On 4/5/23…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-04-07 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — patternImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure 3 of 5 residents (Resident 1, 42 and 9) were free from unnecessary use of psychotropic medications (any drug affecting behavior, mood, thoughts, or perception) when: 1. A Gradual Dose Reduction (GDR) was not completed for Resident 42. 2. Resident 1 and Resident 42 did not have an approved indications for the use of an antipsychotic medication. 3. Resident 9's sleepiness was not identified as a possible side effect of the resident's psychotropic medications. This failure had the potential for Residents to experience unnecessary side effects from the psychotropic medication. Findings: 1. Resident 42 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnosis of Alzheirmer's Dementia (A progressive disease that destroys memory and other important mental functions) according to Resident 42's face sheet. During an observation on 4/4/23 9:29 A.M., Resident 42 came out of the restroom in his wheelchair. Resident 42 stated he was admitted…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-04-07 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — patternConduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to update the facility assessment to reflect the facilities staffing challenges, the usage of staffing agencies, and address the required training and competencies for agency staff, who cared for the facility residents. This failure had the potential to affect the residents' care due to agency staff's lack of training and knowledge. (Cross reference F-tag 699 and F-tag 741) Finding: An interview and joint document review of the facility's facility assessment, dated 8/18/17, was conducted. The Administrator (ADM) reviewed the signature page of the facility assessment, and confirmed that he and the director of nursing (DON) signed the document on 3/28/23. The ADM stated he reviewed the facility assessment on 3/28/23, but did not dissect the document. Both the ADM and the DON confirmed that the facility currently have residents who had been diagnosed with Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD - occurs in some individuals who have encountered a shocking, scary, or dangerous situation), and/or residents with history of trauma.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-04-07 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — patternSet up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and document review, the facility's Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI - a systematic, interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and data-driven approach to maintaining, and improving safety and quality in nursing homes) did not identify areas of improvement in the facility's staff education with regard to Trauma Informed Care. (Cross reference F-tag 699 and F-tag 741) This failure placed any residents admitted to the facility with diagnosis of Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD - occurs in some individuals who have encountered a shocking, scary, or dangerous situation) and history of trauma at increased risk for emotional distress. Findings: A concurrent interview and record review was completed on 4/7/23 at 3:50 P.M., with the Director of Nursing (DON) and Administrator (ADM). The DON stated the facility was working on the facility's identified issues with quality improvement plan. The DON reported these issues to be resident wounds and falls. On 4/7/23 at 3:57 P.M., the DON confirmed there were no improvement projects for Post Traumatic Stress…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-04-07 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to fully implement infection control standards of practice when hand hygiene (using alcohol-based hand gel or performing hand washing with soap and water) was not performed before and after direct contact with residents, before and after glove use, and before and after providing feeding assistance to a resident (Resident 29). In addition, a resident's oxygen tubing was not stored properly and did not have a date of when it was first used or changed. These failures had the potential to spread infection and disease among residents and staff. Findings: 1. On 4/6/23 at 8:10 A.M., an observation was conducted. Certified nursing assistant (CNA) 35 was observed going into Resident 3's room. CNA 35 put on gloves, assisted Resident 3 by positioning the resident and opening food items for the resident. CNA 35 removed his gloves, left Resident 3's room, and went to room C. CNA 35 did not perform hand hygiene. CNA 35 was observed leaving room C and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-04-07 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolatedKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure four of 15 residents' (Resident 20, 40, 25, and 14) privacy and confidentiality was respected and maintained when: 1. Staff entered Resident 20 and Resident 40's private space without knocking or announcing themselves. 2. Resident 25 and Resident 14's clinical documentation was found within other residents' medical records. As a result of this deficient practice, the residents had the potential to feel disrespected. In addition, there was a potential for residents' private medical information to be accessed by unauthorized individuals. Findings: 1a. During an observation on 4/5/23, at 8:44 A.M., Staff 1 went into room A without knocking, walked out of room, then went into room B without knocking or announcing himself. An interview was conducted on 4/5/23, at 8:45 A.M., with Resident 20 who was in room A. Resident 20 stated she saw the man who walked in her room and did not know who he was. Resident 20 stated, That was bothersome.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-04-07 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of 15 residents (Resident 22), reviewed for homelike environment, had a landing mat (a cushioned device similar in shape and size to a mattress that was used to prevent injury if the resident were to fall out of bed) that was maintained in an acceptable condition. As a result, there was the potential for Resident 22's comfort and safety to become compromised. Findings: A review of Resident 22's Face Sheet indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. On 4/4/23 at 4:24 P.M., a joint observation and interview was conducted with certified nursing assistant (CNA) 33 while inside of Resident 22's room. Resident 22 was observed in bed, and on the floor next to the resident's bed, was a landing mat. The landing mat was in two separate sections and appeared to have fallen apart. Each section was ripped and torn with frayed edges and the foam insert was hanging out of each section. There were also stains on the fabric…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-04-07 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolatedEnsure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide communication devices for two of four residents (Resident 24 and Resident 1) reviewed for communication. This failure had the potential for a lack of communication and residents' inability to have their needs met. Findings: 1. Resident 24 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnosis of End Stage Heart Failure (The body can no longer compensate for the lack of blood the heart pumps, and the heart has limited functional recovery) according to Resident 24's face sheet. During an observation on 4/4/23, at 8:20 A.M., Resident 24 was in bed speaking Spanish with staff. Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) 12 translated in Spanish during an interview with Resident 24 on 4/4/23 at 9:38 A.M. Resident 24 was observed with a blanket over her head. Resident 24 stated some staff were good, and some were not so good. Resident 24 stated some staff pulled her up too much or too quickly. Resident 24 stated, Maybe they didn't like me. During…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-04-07 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to coordinate care for one of three residents (Resident 14) reviewed for hospice services. This failure had the potential for Resident 14 to suffer harm. Findings: A review of Resident 14's admission Record indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Alzheimer's Disease (the most common cause of memory loss and other cognitive abilities serious enough to interfere with daily life), other abnormalities of gait (a person's manner of walking) and mobility, generalized muscle weakness, difficulty in walking, repeated falls. On 4/6/23 at 2:35 P.M., an interview was conducted with licensed nurse (LN) 41, who stated, Weeks ago, she (Res 14) verbalized Please God, take me now. LN 41 stated when Res 14 said, 'Please God take me now' I gave her a rosary. I didn't tell anyone because it was at night. I told the incoming LN/ RN. Ln 41 stated, I didn't tell the shift supervisors or the hospice. I could have…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-04-07 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide an environment free of accident hazards for one of three residents (Resident 14) reviewed for accidents. This failure had the potential for Resident 14's to suffer harm from a fall. Findings: A review of Resident 14's admission Record indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include Alzheimer's Disease (the most common cause of memory loss and other cognitive abilities serious enough to interfere with daily life), other abnormalities of gait (a person's manner of walking) and mobility, generalized muscle weakness, difficulty in walking, repeated falls. A record review was conducted of Resident 14's fall care plan, with a goal of 4/19/23, indicated, At risk for falls related to Alzheimer dementia, new oxygen use, diuretic and hypertension medication use. Status: active (current). Interventions: sensor alarm to the bed. Status: Active (current). Place call bell/ light within easy reach.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-04-07 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of one sampled resident (Resident 16), had her suction equipment (system that removes/sucks up secretions) adequately maintained. This failure had the potential to result in inadequate clearance of Resident 16's oral secretions causing respiratory distress (trouble breathing). Findings: A review of Resident 16's admission Record indicated the resident was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses included esophageal obstruction (blockage in tube that connects the throat to the stomach), dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), disturbances of salivary secretion (abnormal mouth saliva) and gastroesophageal reflux (stomach contents go up into the esophagus). Physician order dated 5/27/2018 indicated oral suction to be done three times a day as needed. Physician order dated 6/6/2018 indicated continuous aspiration (choking) precautions. On review of Clinical Notes dated 12/14/22 at 2:48 A.M., LN 2…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-04-07 · tag F0699 — isolatedProvide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure one of two residents (Resident 24) received Trauma Informed Care (TIC- an intervention and organizational approach that focuses on how trauma may affect an individual's life and his or her response to behavioral health). This failure resulted in the facility's inability to identify possible triggers that could result in re-traumatization (the reactivation of trauma symptoms via thoughts, memories, or feelings related to the past traumatic experience). Findings: Resident 24 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnosis of End Stage Heart Failure (The body can no longer compensate for the lack of blood the heart pumps, and the heart has limited functional recovery) according to Resident 24's face sheet. Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) 12 translated in Spanish during an interview with Resident 24 on 4/4/23 at 9:38 A.M. Resident 24 was observed with a blanket over her head. Resident 24 stated some staff were good, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-04-07 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure three of 30 administered medications were given in accordance with the physician orders. This failure resulted in 10% medication error rate. In addition, failure to administer medications in accordance with the physician order had the potential to affect resident safety. Findings: A medication administration observation was conducted on 4/6/23 at 8:07 A.M Licensed Nurse (LN) 41 prepared Resident 16's medication. LN 41 prepared the following medications: 1. Amlodipine (blood pressure medication) 5 milligrams (mg) 1 tab (tablet) 2. Benazepril (blood pressure medication) 10 mg 1 tab 3. Buspirone (anti-anxiety medication) 5 mg 1 tab 4. Cranberry (supplement) 450 mg 1 tab 5. Docusate Sodium (stool softener) 100 mg 2 tabs 6. Glycopyrrolate (medication for excessive saliva production) 1 mg (Crush and dissolve in hot water) 7. Multivitamin with minerals (supplement) 30 milliliters (ml) 8. Omeprazole (medication for acid reflux - acidic stomach fluid flows back up) 20 mg/10 ml gave 10 ml 9. Miralax (laxative)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-04-07 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolatedProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that food items in the kitchen and in a resident's room (Resident 3) were stored according to professional standards for food safety. As a result, there was the potential for residents to be exposed to contaminated food and/or experience foodborne illness. Findings: 1. On 4/4/23 at 8 A.M., an initial kitchen tour was conducted with the head chef (HC). Observed in the walk-in refrigerator, was a large box with approximately 24 green bell peppers in it. There were approximately seven green bell peppers that were covered with gray, fuzzy areas. The HC stated the green bell peppers had mold on them and should not have been stored among non-spoiled produce. The general manager joined the observation in the walk-in refrigerator. A large box of bagged shredded lettuce was observed. Two of the three bags of shredded lettuce had lettuce that appeared discolored and slimy. The HC stated the shredded lettuce should have been thrown out. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-03-29 · tag F0552 — isolatedEnsure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to explain care to a resident in their native language for 1 of 13 sampled residents (10). As a result the facility did not identify language as a precipitating factor to Resident 10's combative behavior. Findings: Resident 10 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnoses which included dementia (mental decline and impaired memory) per the facility's Face Sheet. On 3/28/19 at 3:45 P.M., an interview was conducted with Resident 10's RP. The RP stated Resident 10 was uncooperative with agressive behaviors when care was provided by certain staff members. The RP stated Resident 10 spoke English and Spanish, but Spanish was her native language. On 3/28/19 at 4:20 P.M., an observation of Resident 10 was conducted with CNA 2. Resident 10 was observed lying in bed, quiet and awake. CNA 2 spoke to Resident 10 in Spanish. On 3/28/10 at 4:22 P.M., an interview was conducted with CNA 2. CNA 2 stated Resident 10 preferred to communicate in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-03-29 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, 1 of 13 residents (7) was not correctly positioned when sitting in a wheel chair. As a result this practice had the potential for Resident 7 to develop a pressure ulcer (injuries to skin and underlying tissue resulting from prolonged pressure on the skin). Findings: Resident 7 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnoses to include abnormal posture per the facility's Face Sheet. Per Resident 7's history and physical, dated 3/1/19: Resident 7 was unable to independently move her legs and her knees were in a flexed position and contracted (abnormal shortening of muscle tissue, resistant to stretching ) On 3/27/19 at 11:54 A.M., an observation of Resident 7 was conducted. Resident 7 was seated upright in a wheelchair slumped to the right side. The resident's right lateral foot rested against the right wheel of the wheelchair. On 3/27/19 at 3:56 P.M., 4:05 P.M., and 5:06 P.M., an observation of Resident 7 was conducted. Resident 7 was observed lying on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-03-29 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — isolatedProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure call lights were answered in a timely manner to address resident needs for five residents interviewed on initial tour of the facility, and one resident from the confidential group interview. This failure had the potential to affect the physical and psychosocial well-being of these residents. Findings: According to Resident A's baseline care plan, dated 3/22/19, the resident was alert and cogitatively intact. This document also indicated Resident A had a history of falls, was continent of bowel and bladder, and required assistance of one person for toilet use. During an interview with Resident A on 3/27/19 at 8:40 A.M., the resident stated it took a while for staff to answer her call bell. Resident A stated her call light was broken and she was given a bell to ring. The resident stated it took a long time for anyone to answer her bell when she rang it. During an observation on 3/27/19 between 8:48 A.M. and 9:03 A.M., Resident A rang her bell five separate times before any staff was observed to enter her…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-03-29 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement procedures for the provision of pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of three of three residents (23, 17, and 99) reviewed during medication pass. 1. The facility failed to administer medications in accordance with the physician's order when metoprolol tartrate (medication used to treat high blood pressure) was administered at half the prescribed dose for more than one month to Resident 23. This failure posed the potential to have a negative effect on the resident's health. 2. The facility failed to ensure accurate documentation of Residents 17 and Resident 99's controlled medications. These failures posed the risk for diversion of controlled medications. Findings: 1. On 3/27/19 at 9:05 A.M., a medication pass was observed. LN 3 administered 12.5 mg of metoprolol to Resident 23. However, LN 3 documented on Resident 23's 3/19 Medication Administration Record (MAR) that she had administered metoprolol 25 mg to Resident 23.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-03-29 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the medication error rate was less than 5% when the physician's orders were not followed for two of 33 residents reviewed for medications (Residents 9 and 23). 1. Furosemide (medication used to treat fluid retention and swelling) was not available for administration for Resident 9 as ordered by the physician. 2. Metoprolol tartrate (medication used to treat high blood pressure) was not given to Resident 23 as ordered by the physician. These failures posed the potential to negatively affect the residents' health and resulted in a medication error rate of 6.06%. Findings: Review of the facility's Policy and Procedure titled, Medication Administration. General Guidelines (California Specific dated 5/16, showed: .Medications are administered in accordance with written orders of the prescriber . 1. On 3/27/19 at 8:15 A.M., an observation of a medication pass performed by LN 22 was conducted. LN 22 prepared medications for Resident 9. LN…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-03-29 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were stored as per the facility's policy and procedure when one of one medication storage rooms were observed. 1. An expired anti-diarrheal (loperamide) bottle, an expired triple antibiotic ointment box, and an expired container of 10% Zinc Oxide Adult Barrier Spray were removed from the medication storage room. 2. One vial of opened Influenza vaccine Afluria 5 ml was not dated when opened. These failures had the potential to result in unsafe administration of medications. Findings: On [DATE] at 9:54 A.M., an observation of the medication storage room and concurrent interviews with the DON and LN 3 were conducted. The following was observed: 1. One bottle of anti-diarrheal (loperamide) 2 mg (milligram) 96 capsules was expired on 12/18. The DON confirmed the expiration date and stated the bottle should have been discarded. 2. A box of triple antibiotic ointment containing 144 individual packets was expired on 1/19 and a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-03-29 · tag F0800 — isolatedProvide each resident with a nourishing, palatable, well-balanced diet that meets his or her daily nutritional and special dietary needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not provide palatable food at a desired temperature for 5 of 12 residents interviewed during initial tour. This failure had the potential to affect the residents' meal intake and enjoyment of their meals. Findings: On 3/27/19 during an initial tour of the facility, five residents interviewed complained the food was frequently cold. At 8:40 A.M., Resident A stated, The food is cold. At 8:43 A.M., Resident B stated, The food is cold and dry. At 9:59 A.M., Resident C stated, The food could be hotter. At 10:05 A.M., Resident D stated, The food is not always hot. At 10:09 A.M., Resident E's family member stated, The food is not always hot. Resident E's family member further stated Resident E was unable to tell anyone the food was not hot, and would not eat when the food was cold. According to the Resident Council Meeting minutes, dated 1/10/19, two of eight residents stated the food was cold. On 3/28/19 at 12:50 P.M., an observation and tasting of food on a meal tray was conducted with the DSS and the RD. The DSS took…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-03-29 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolatedProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility did not assure fresh (within food safety guidelines) produce was available for use when preparing residents meals. This created the potential for unsafe food consumption. Findings: On 3/27/19 at 7:40 A.M., a concurrent observation of the kitchen and interview with the DSS was conducted. Bananas on the counter in a wire basket did not have a received by date or use by date. The DSS stated we need to label the basket with a use by date for the bananas. On 3/27/19 at 8:02 A.M., a concurrent observation of the kitchen and interview with the DSS was conducted. Outside of the freezer on a steel shelf, yellow onions were observed in a gray bin. The onions had an expiration date of 3/20/19 and were available for use when preparing meals for residents. The DSS stated the onions were expired and should not have been available to use for meals. On 3/29/19 at 8:40 A.M., an interview was conducted with the RD and the DSS. The DSS and RD agreed the bananas should have had a received by date or use by date for safe consumption. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-03-29 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure proper infection control practices were implemented for 1 of 13 residents (97) who had a catheter (hollow flexible tube used to drain urine from the bladder) when Resident 97's urine drainage bags were not properly positioned. This failure created the potential for Resident 97 to be exposed to germs in his urinary tract. Findings: Resident 97 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnoses of urinary retention (inability to completely empty the bladder) per the facility's Face Sheet. A. On 3/27/19 at 11:09 A.M., a concurrent observation and interview with CNA 6 was conducted. Resident 97 was observed to have a suprapubic catheter attached to a urinary drainage bag. Resident 97's urinary drainage bag was on the floor beside his bed. CNA 6 stated urinary drainage bags should not touch the floor because the floor is dirty. On 3/28/19 at 8:46 A.M., a concurrent observation and interview with PTA 1 was conducted. Resident 97 was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-03-29 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure one of five sampled residents (39) received the pneumococcal vaccine in accordance with the Center for Disease Control (CDC) recommendations upon admission to the facility. This failure had the potential to place Resident 39 at risk for acquiring, transmitting, or experiencing complications from pneumococcal disease (bacteria which causes pneumonia - infection in the lung). Findings: Resident 39 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses, which included dementia (a loss of mental abilities that leads to impairments in memory, reasoning, planning, and behavior), and encounter for palliative care (comfort care to treat the symptoms and side effects of serious illness) per the facility's Face Sheet. This document also indicated Resident 39 was over [AGE] years of age. During a concurrent interview and record review with LN 21 on 3/29/19 at 10:21 A.M., LN 21 stated Resident 39's RP consented for the resident to receive the pneumococcal…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$44,890 in federal fines across 1 penalty.
- $44,890 — penalty dated 2026-05-11
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ST PAUL'S EPISCOPAL HOME INC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | 100% | since 01/01/1980 |
| LUKAS, SOPHIA | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 02/20/2023 |
| DEKIEFFER, KITTY | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; TRUSTEE OF THE SNF | — | since 06/23/2025 |
| EDD, PATRICK | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; TRUSTEE OF THE SNF | — | since 06/23/2025 |
| GREINER, PHILIP | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; TRUSTEE OF THE SNF | — | since 06/23/2025 |
| GROSS, DAN | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; TRUSTEE OF THE SNF | — | since 06/23/2025 |
| KELLER, MARY | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; TRUSTEE OF THE SNF | — | since 06/23/2025 |
| MARUSIAK, DAVID | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; TRUSTEE OF THE SNF | — | since 06/23/2025 |
| SUTTON, JACOB | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; TRUSTEE OF THE SNF | — | since 06/23/2025 |
| ELLENICH, RONALD | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/26/2026 |
| MCHALE, MICHAEL | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/11/2022 |
| RAJPER, SALEEM | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/26/2026 |
| VIEU, GEORGE | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/17/2023 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 32 rows in the source record cover these 13 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $937K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 11% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in CA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 555144. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-06-26, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.