Jewish Home & Rehab Center D/P SNF
302 Silver Avenue, San Francisco, CA 94112 · Non profit - Corporation · 362 certified beds · (415) 334-2500 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- a strong health-inspection score (4/5) — the hardest rating to game (though it’s ranked within its own state, not nationally)
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- a high payroll-based staffing rating (5/5)
- lower-than-typical staff turnover (26% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Dec 2024
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565)
- it has 1 actual-harm citation
- a high number of inspection citations overall (51) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 4 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 5 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 3 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 3 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 3 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 3 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 2 to 5 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 14.6% | 10.2% | 15.4% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 5.8% | 4.0% | 5.4% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.6% | 0.8% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 1.9% | 1.2% | 2.0% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 1.5% | 7.3% | 6.5% | better |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.4% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 2.1% | 1.6% | 3.3% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 12.0% | 9.8% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 7.5% | 13.7% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 96.8% | 98.2% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 5.0% | 4.3% | 4.7% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 18.8% | 10.2% | 21.2% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 15.0% | 12.0% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.8% | 1.5% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 89.9% | 93.2% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 25.2% | 23.0% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 15.3% | 11.2% | 12.0% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 2.00 | 2.25 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 2.13 | 1.57 | 1.80 | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
65.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 1,185 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 55.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 515 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.36 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 62% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 15% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 65.6%CMS range 62.9–68.5 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | better than U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 8.2%CMS range 6.9–9.5 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | better than U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 55.1% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 53.2% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 45.2% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 89.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 94.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 95.8% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.3% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 2.4% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 4.2%CMS range 2.8–6.2 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | better than U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.82 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 362 beds and averages 330.2 residents a day — about 91% occupied, or roughly 32 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 5.20 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.23 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.16 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.49 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.49 on weekdays — 18% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.38 to 0.85 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 26% is below the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
51 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 40 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-01-25 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to provide an environment free of accident hazards when Resident 1 (one sampled resident), spilled a cup of hot water onto her chest, left hand, and left thigh, and suffered 2nd degree burns from the hot water. The facility failed to provide adequate supervision to prevent an avoidable accident. Finding: Resident 1 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including history of falling, muscle weakness, heart failure, liver and kidney disease, gait and mobility abnormalities. Review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool, indicated no cognition difficulties (thinking), required partial assistance transferring from bed to chair and back, required assistance with meal set-up and clean-up. Resident 1 has left-handed weakness due to a stroke in 2021. During an observation and interview in Resident 1's room on 1/22/2024, at 10:45 AM, resident was reclining on bed holding a small wrapped bag of ice on her chest,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-12 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolatedPrevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure two of four sampled residents (Residents 2 and 332) were free from unnecessary psychotropic medications (drugs that affect brain activities associated with mental processes and behavior) when:1. For Resident 2, there was no specific target behavior monitoring for the use of Olanzapine (an antipsychotic medication).2. a. For Resident 332, the order for Lorazepam (medication used to treat anxiety) PRN (as needed) did not have a stop date, and b. Lorazepam PRN was administered without behavior exhibited.These deficient practices had the potential for Residents 2 and 332 to receive unnecessary psychotropic medication, be exposed to adverse health consequences from the medication, which could negatively impact the resident's mental, physical, and psychosocial well-being.1. Resident 2 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included vascular dementia (refers to changes to memory, thinking, and behavior resulting from conditions that affect the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-12 · tag F0628 — isolatedProvide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not send notification to Ombudsman when two of three residents (Resident 1 and Resident 2) were transferred out to acute.This failure has potential for residents not having the right to appeal when necessary.During a record review on 2/12/26 at 10 AM, Resident 12's admission Record dated 2/12/26, indicated, was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including: Retention of Urine (inability to fully empty the bladder), Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia(a non cancerous age related enlargement of the prostate), Infection and Inflammatory Reaction due to other Urinary catheter ( infection often stems from medical devices like the foley catheter.) During a review on 2/12/26 at 10AM, of nurses notes, dated 10/1/15 at 00:39, indicated, Resident 12 screamed for help, he transferred from bed to chair unassisted, with foley bag still hanging by his bedside, pulling the catheter midway had bleeding noted.patient confused and agitated. MD called and ordered to transfer to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-03 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, facility staff failed to provide pressure injury services for one of three sampled residents, Resident 1.The facility failed to:1. Accurately monitor and evaluate Resident's 1's pressure injuries. 2. Revise treatment plans to promote healing of pressure injuries (any lesion caused by unrelieved pressure that results in damage to the underlying skin- see full definition below). 3. Evaluate and monitor the impact of interventions to prevent new pressure injuries from developing. 4. Implement, monitor and modify interventions to attempt to stabilize, reduce or remove underlying risk factors. These failures resulted in Resident 1 developing new Moisture Associated Skin Damage (a type of skin irritation or damage caused by prolonged exposure to moisture) on Coccyx (small triangular bone at the base of the spinal column), a Stage II pressure injury on the Coccyx, new open lesions (tissue which has suffered damage through injury or disease,) on both rear (the back part of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-08 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the environmrnt of one of one sampled resident (Resident 1) was free of potential accident hazards (falls and injuries from a lift) when they transferred Resident 1 in a lift to a commode and left her hanging a foot above the commode for several hours several times per day rather than lowering her to the toilet seat of the commode as instructed in the manual from the manufacturer (Invacare). Although Resident 1 chose this procedure and staff came to check on her while she was hanging from the lift, this does not prevent: the lift from failing; Resident 1 from falling; Resident 1 from injury; the facility from responsibility for Resident 1's safety. Findings: In an interview and record review with SN 1 on 8/8/25 at 10:45 a.m., SN 1 stated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility (over 10 years ago). SN 1 said Resident 1 was dependent on staff to turn and reposition her in bed, transfer her to a commode or wheelchair, and feed her. In an interview with SN 2 on 8/8/25 at 11:41 a.m., SN 2 said Resident 1…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-24 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — patternTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to report three of 11 allegations of abuse within two hours, to the California Department of Public Health (the Department).This failure had the potential to leave residents vulnerable to further abuse. 1.Two intakes of the same allegation, sent 2 different dates. Cross reference to Incident 2303945 (CA0092790) and 2303946 (CA00928621) A review of Form SOC 341 Report of Suspected Dependent Adult/Elder Abuse with completed date 10/31/24, indicated, Resident 1 alleged that two Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs) were handling him roughly while changing his bedsheets on 10/29/24 .nurse conducted skin and pain assessment .denied any pain and no noted skin injury .Both CNAs were immediately suspended pending investigation. DPOA, MD, CDPH ,Ombudsman, SFPD were notified of incident .facility conducting investigation of this incident.A review of admission Record, dated 7/23/25, indicated, admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including: Traumatic…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-24 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — patternRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to report the result of investigations to the State Survey Agency (SSA) within 5 working days of the incident for four (4) of 12 residents' (Resident 1, Resident 2, Resident 3, Resident 4, and Resident 5) abuse allegations .Resident 1 alleged 2 CNAs rough handling during change of bedsheet on 10/29/24Resident 2 alleged 1 CNA on 11/5/24 was aggressive and said get up by yourself, walk by yourselfResident 3 alleged a nurse on the night of 8/27/24 was rude, harsh, and hit her. Resident 5 went to Resident 4's room, grabbed his face and pushed it back.This failure may cause delay in taking all necessary actions to protect the residents and prevent further occurrences.1. Review of Resident 1's document titled, Report of Suspected Dependent Adult/Elder Abuse, known as SOC (State of California) 341, with a completed date of 10/31/24, indicated, an allegation of staff to resident abuse was reported to law enforcement on 10/30/24, to Ombudsman on 10/30/24, California Department of Public Health on 10/31/24. The SOC 341 indicated, staff…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-03 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure three out of three sample residents (Residents 1, 2, and 3) were free from neglect. All three residents were dependent on staff for transfers and ADL (Activities of Daily Living) and all three residents reported their unit was short staffed, resulting in long wait for services. These episodes may have resulted in: 1. Resident 1 expressing feelings helplessness, frustration and discomfort when: Resident 1 waited for four hours in her wet briefs before staff cleaned her and changed the brief; was left on the commode for 1.5 hours; was not repositioning by staff in a timely manner which caused her discomfort; Resident 1 expressing feelings of frustrations, abandonment, and being suicidal. 2. Resident 2 saying she was in pain at night after staff did not put her to bed in a timely manner. Resident 2 expressed feelings of frustrations and worry because staffing issues were communicated to the facility without any substantive changes. 3. Resident 3…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-03 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not report allegations of neglect for Resident 1, one of three sample residents. Resident 1 sent four emails to the facility alleging sub-par quality of care issues such as: delayed response to request for care, no care, not getting enough food and water, and getting minimal care. This has the potential to place Resident 1 and other residents at risk for abuse/neglect. Findings: Review of Resident 1 ' s record titled admission RECORD, printed on 01/03/2025, indicated she was admitted with multiple diagnosis including: quadriplegia (partial or total loss of function in all four limbs and the torso), constipation (difficulty in emptying bowel, usually due to hardened feces), depression, muscle spasms, and limitation of activities due to disability. Review of Resident 1 ' s records titled Minimum Data Set (MDS, a standardized resident assessment tool), dated 12/26/2024, indicated her BIM score was 15 out of 15 (BIM=Brief Interview for Mental status, a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-03 · tag F0675 — failed to support quality of life — isolatedHonor each resident's preferences, choices, values and beliefs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not provide the necessary care to maintain the highest practicable mental and psychosocial wellbeing for Resident 1, one of three sample residents. Resident 1 was totally dependent on staff for Activities of Daily Living (ADL) and other care needs. Starting July 2024, the facility unilaterally reduced direct care giver hours by 41.67% to Resident 1. This resulted in Resident 1 expressing feelings of frustrations, abandonment, and suicidal ideation. Findings: Review of Resident 1 ' s record titled admission RECORD, printed on 01/03/2025, indicated she was admitted with multiple diagnosis including: quadriplegia (partial or total loss of function in all four limbs and the torso), constipation (difficulty in emptying bowel, usually due to hardened feces), depression, muscle spasms, and limitation of activities due to disability. Review of Resident 1 ' s records titled Minimum Data Set (MDS, a standardized resident assessment tool), dated 12/26/2024, indicated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-08-28 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to maintain a sanitary kitchen when: 1. A rodent dropping was found under the cooking line (area in the kitchen where multiple pieces of cooking equipment are in a line), this area had a build-up of food, black grime and trash. 2. Multiple areas in the kitchen on the floor under equipment, there was old food, trash and black grime. 3. The ice machine had a black grime build-up on the area above the ice grates where water flows to fill up the grates. 4. Utensils were stored with a build-up of old food. 5. The refrigerator utilized to store food for activities was food crumbs and spills and expired foods. 6. Multiple floor drains in the kitchen had a build-up of old food and grime. 7. The dating system in the walk-in refrigerator was not accurate and readable. These failures had the potential to cause foodborne illness in 332 out of 338 medically compromised residents who receive food from the kitchen. Findings: 1. During an observation, on the meat preparation side of the kitchen, on August 21, 2024, at 10:40 AM,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 40 citations
- Potential for harm · E2024-08-28 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — patternEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement their fall policy and procedure for three of 6 sampled residents (Resident 187, 327, and 356) when: 1. There was no evidence of post fall interdisciplinary team (IDT, a group of healthcare professionals from different fields who work together to provide the best care for a patient) meeting for Resident 187. 2. There were no consent for video monitoring and evidence of post fall IDT meeting for Resident 327. 3. There was no post fall assessment and completed IDT meeting note for Resident 356. These failures could potentially result in negative outcomes for Resident 187, 327, and 356. Findings: 1. Review of Resident 187's clinical record indicated, Resident 187 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including dementia (memory loss), hypertension (high blood pressure), and atrial fibrillation (Afib, an irregular and often rapid heart rate that commonly causes poor blood flow and can increase the risk of stroke). Review of Resident 187's Minimum Data Set (MDS, resident assessment tool), dated 2/8/24 indicated,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-28 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — patternEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to maintain a medication error rate below five percent (5%). During the medication pass on 8/20/24 and 8/21/24, four medication errors were observed out of twenty-six opportunities for three out of six residents, resulting in an error rate of 15%. This failure had the potential to result in harm in the health and safety of residents. Findings: 1. A review of the manufacturer insert for Flovent indicated to properly administer the Flovent HFA 220 µg inhaler, it is essential to follow the manufacturer's instructions. Begin by shaking the inhaler vigorously for five seconds to ensure that the medication is well-mixed. Hold the inhaler with the mouthpiece facing downwards, and exhale deeply through the mouth to empty the lungs as much as possible. While inhaling deeply, press the top of the canister all the way down to release the medication. After inhaling, hold your breath for up to 10 seconds, or as long as you comfortably can, allowing the medication to settle in your lungs. Once you have held your breath,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-08-28 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — patternSet up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and document reviews it was found that the facilities' Quality Assessment Performance Improvement (QAPI) program was ineffective. Despite its purpose to proactively identify and prevent medication administration errors, it fell short. This was evident during a medication pass observation conducted during the survey, which revealed multiple medication errors related to eye drops (See F759). Findings: The hospital policy, Specific Medication Administration Procedures - Eyedrop Administration, Section 8.5, aims to ensure the safe and accurate administration of ophthalmic solutions by outlining specific steps, such as wearing gloves, creating a pouch with the lower eyelid, and carefully dispensing drops without touching the dropper to any surface. However, during an observation on 08/20/24, Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 1 administered Systane eye drops to Resident 102 but allowed the dropper tip to touch the resident's eyelashes, which is a deviation from the recommended sterile technique. Systane is used to relieve dry, irritated eyes, and maintaining…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-28 · tag F0582 — isolatedGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based interview and record review, the facility failed to provide two of three residents, Resident 177 and Resident 248, with SNF-ABN (Skilled Nursing Facility Advanced Beneficiary Notice). FINDINGS: Review of Resident 177, resident was admitted on [DATE] for Part A services, with diagnosis of Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyneuritis (a disease of the nervous system with progressive weakness and loss of sense and function of the legs and arms). SNF Beneficiary Protection Notification Review for Resident 177, indicated, Medicare Part A Skilled Services Episodes Start date:2/28/24. Last Covered day of Part A Service: 5/1/24. NOMNC was given 4/28/24. No issues. SNF ABN form not provided to resident. Per facility, CMS-10055 not needed, Resident 177 was placed on Part A for daily skilled PT,OT and ST. Resident 177 is still in the facility for custodial care. Review of Resident 248, resident was admitted on [DATE] for Part A services, with diagnosis of Ileus (a condition when the bowel does not work correctly).…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-28 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to recognize and report an allegation of abuse for one out of six sampled residents (Resident 372) when Resident 372 reported to Social Worker (SW) 1 an allegation of verbal abuse by nursing staff and Physical Therapist (PT) 1, yet it was not reported to the facility administrator or other necessary agencies. This failure has the potential for allegations of abuse that may be substantiated to not be properly corrected and keep residents at risk for continued exposure to abuse. Findings: A review of facility policy and procedure (P & P), titled Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation, Mistreatment, and Misappropriation of Resident Property, last revised August 2024, defined verbal abuse as the use of oral, written or gestured communication that willfully includes disparaging and derogatory terms to resident or their families . The P & P further indicated that reports of alleged abuse .are promptly and thoroughly investigated, and report all abuse allegations to the administrator/designee, California Department of Public Health, San…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-28 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to recognize and investigate an allegation of abuse for one out of six sampled residents (Resident 372) when Resident 372 reported to Social Worker (SW) 1 an allegation of verbal abuse by nursing staff and Physical Therapist (PT) 1, yet it was not thoroughly investigated by the facility. This failure has the potential for allegations of abuse that may be substantiated to not be properly corrected and keep residents at risk for continued exposure to abuse. Findings: A review of facility policy and procedure (P & P), titled Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation, Mistreatment, and Misappropriation of Resident Property, last revised August 2024, defined verbal abuse as the use of oral, written or gestured communication that willfully includes disparaging and derogatory terms to resident or their families . The P & P further indicated that reports of alleged abuse .are promptly and thoroughly investigated, and report all abuse allegations to the administrator/designee, California Department of Public Health, San Francisco Police Department…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-28 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to accurately assess hearing for one out of two sampled residents (Resident 356) when Resident 356 was assessed as not having hearing aids when they used hearing aids on admission to the facility. This failure has the potential for Resident 356's needs to not be met due to their communication and hearing needs not being accurately assessed. Findings: A review of Resident 356's face sheet (summary of resident's demographic and admitting information), dated 08/27/24, indicated that Resident 356 was admitted in 2024 with diagnoses including DISPLACED FRACTURE OF MEDIAL CONDYLE OF RIGHT FEMUR . (a break in the right upper leg bone). A review of Resident 356's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a tool used to measure health status in nursing home residents) dated on 08/03/2024 indicated a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS, a cognitive screening tool) score of 13 out of 15 (scores of 0-7 suggests severe cognitive impairment, 9 to 12 suggests moderate cognitive…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-28 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement comprehensive care plans that included measurable objectives and specific interventions for 1 of 35 sampled residents (Resident 327) when: 1. Care plan was not developed to address urinary tract infection (UTI, a common infection that occurs when bacteria enter the urinary tract and cause inflammation). 2. Fall care plan interventions were not implemented. These failures had the potential for not meeting Resident 327's nursing needs and goals to attain the resident's highest practicable well-being. Findings: 1. Review of Resident 327's clinical record indicated, Resident 327 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including dementia (memory loss), anxiety disorder (a condition that causes excessive fear, worry, and uneasiness that can interfere with daily life), and urinary tract infection (UTI). Review of Resident 327's Minimum Data Set (MDS, resident assessment tool) dated 4/17/24 indicated, . Cognitive Patterns (the mental processes that people use to perceive, interpret, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-28 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to update care plans for three of 35 sampled residents (Resident 327, 187, and 264) when: 1. Fall care plan was not updated for Resident 187 after her falls on 2/15/24, 3/23/24, and 8/2/24. 2. Fall care plan was not updated for Resident 327 after her falls on 6/30/24, and 8/21/24. 3. Care plan for pain was not updated for Resident 264. These failures had the potential to put the residents at risk of not receiving appropriate cares. Findings: 1. Review of Resident 187's clinical record indicated, Resident 187 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including dementia (memory loss), hypertension (high blood pressure), and atrial fibrillation (Afib, an irregular and often rapid heart rate that commonly causes poor blood flow and can increase the risk of stroke). Review of Resident 187's Minimum Data Set (MDS, resident assessment tool), dated 2/8/24 indicated, her memory was severely impaired. During an interview on 8/27/24 at 2:02 PM with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-28 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolatedEnsure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that a resident's assistive hearing device was functioning in one of two sampled residents (Resident 356) when Resident 356 reported that their hearing aid had been broken for multiple days and clinical staff were not aware of it. This failure has the potential to result in the residents' needs not being met due to a reduction in their ability to hear and communicate. Findings: A review of Resident 356's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a tool used to measure health status in nursing home residents) dated on 08/03/2024 indicated a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS, a cognitive screening tool) score of 13 out of 15 (scores of 0-7 suggests severe cognitive impairment, 9 to 12 suggests moderate cognitive impairment, and 13 to 15 suggests that cognition is intact). During a concurrent observation and interview on 08/21/24 at 2:27 PM with Resident 356 in their room, Resident 356 was observed pointing to their left ear. Resident 356 stated that she could best hear in her left ear because her right-sided hearing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-28 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure safety to prevent fall related injuries to one of one sampled resident (Resident 250) when a volunteer transported Resident 250 using a wheelchair. The facility failure resulted to Resident 250 to sustain a laceration (a tear on the skin) to the forehead, a fracture (a break in the bone) on the second cervical (neck) spinal bone (C2 dens fracture), and a fracture along the ulnar base of the first proximal phalanx of the left hand (a finger on the left hand). Findings: Review of Resident 250's admission record indicated, was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including repeated falls, history of multiple fracture of the left ribs, fracture of the left clavicle (collarbone, bones that connects the arm to the body), and supranuclear opthalmoplegia (a medical condition that involves the gradual deterioration of the brain, loss of balance, slowing of movements, and cognitive [includes thinking, reasoning, and remembering] impairment).…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-28 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain infection control program and practices designed to help prevent the development and transmission of diseases and infections when: 1. Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 1 did not perform hand hygiene between Resident 327 and Resident 289 in the dining room in G ([NAME] Building) 2. 2. The facility failed to maintain 6 out of 6 wash machines per manufacturer's recommendation. These failures had the potential for spread of infection to residents and staff. Findings: 1. During an observation on 8/21/24 at 1:58 PM in the dining room in G2, CNA 1 assisted Resident 327, then cleaned Resident 327's table with a towel. Then CNA 1 went directly to Resident 289's table, then assisted Resident 289 without performing hand hygiene. During an interview on 8/21/24 at 2:03 PM with CNA 1 in the dining room in G2, CNA 1 acknowledged he did not perform hand hygiene between Resident 327 and Resident 289 when asked. CNA 1 stated, Infection when asked…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-28 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — isolatedKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility failed to maintain equipment in safe operating condition when reach-in refrigerator #7 had condensation inside the refrigerator that was dripping on food. This had the potential to contaminate food and cause food-borne illness to 332 out of 338 medically compromised residents who receive food from the kitchen. Findings: During the initial tour of the kitchen and concurrent interview with the Director of Dining Services (DDS) on August 20, 2024 at 3:14 pm, the reach-in refrigerator #7 on the dairy side of the kitchen had condensation dripping from the ceiling of the fridge onto food. The DDS stated that the hinge of the door needs to be realigned to prevent the condensation from forming. She stated the surveyor that observed earlier discovered it. During a review of the facility policy titled Safety and Equipment Maintenance, dated January 2024, indicated, proper maintenance of the physical plant and all equipment in the department is the responsibility of the Director in cooperation with the Maintenance department. During a review of the FDA Federal Food Code, dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-25 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to implement pressure ulcer care plan for one of 3 sampled residents (Resident 1) when Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 1 did not reposition Resident 1 every 2 hours on 5/1/24. This failure had the potential to delay the healing of the pressure ulcer for Resident 1. Findings: Review of Resident 1's clinical record indicated, Resident 1 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including nephritis (inflammation of the kidneys), renal and perinephric abscess (a pocket of pus in the kidney and perinephric space, surrounding the kidneys), dementia (memory loss), and pressure ulcer (same as bedsore, an injury to the skin and the tissue below the skin that are due to pressure on the skin for a long time). Review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS, resident assessment tool), dated 4/15/24 indicated, Resident 1 was cognitively moderately impaired. During an interview on 4/24/24 at 2:27 PM with Ombudsman (a person who assists residents in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-25 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolatedEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of 3 Certified Nursing Assistants (CNA) 1 was competent when CNA 1 did not know Resident 1 had dementia and urinary tract infection (UTI, a collective term that describes any infection involving any part of the urinary tract, namely the kidneys, ureters, bladder and urethra). This failure had the potential to result in Resident 1 not receiving appropriate treatments and services. Findings: Review of Resident 1's clinical record indicated, Resident 1 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including nephritis (inflammation of the kidneys), renal and perinephric abscess (a pocket of pus in the kidney and perinephric space, surrounding the kidneys), dementia (memory loss), and pressure ulcer (same as bedsore, an injury to the skin and the tissue below the skin that are due to pressure on the skin for a long time). Review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS, resident assessment tool), dated 4/15/24 indicated, Resident 1 was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-29 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — patternEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure to explain the skills and techniques when two out of 4 sampled certified nursing assistants (CNAs) did not know how to apply Purewick (a female external catheter designed to provide a non-invasive option for the management of urinary incontinence in women) to residents. This failure of not having competent skills and techniques puts all residents at risk for getting wet when using Purewick. Findings: Review of Resident 1' s clinical record indicated, Resident 1 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including multiple sclerosis (long-lasting disease resulting nerve damage disrupts communication between the brain and the body), generalized muscle weakness, and major depressive disorder (a mental health disorder characterized by persistently depressed mood or loss of interest in activities, causing significant impairment in daily life). Review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS, resident assessment tool), dated 10/9/23, indicated, Resident 1 was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-29 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to revise the constipation care plan for one of 4 sampled residents (Resident 2) when there was no evidence that the care plan (CP) was updated after [DATE] when Resident 2 returned from the hospital with constipation on CT (a noninvasive medical examination or procedure that uses specialized X-ray equipment to produce cross-sectional images of the body). This failure had the potential to put Resident 2 at risk of not receiving appropriate care timely. Findings: Review of Resident 2' s clinical record indicated, Resident 2 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including malignant neoplasm of overlapping sites of brain (a cancer that overlaps contiguous sites of brain and whose point of origin cannot be determined), aftercare following surgery for neoplasm, dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), and limitation of activities due to disability. Review of Resident 2's Minimum Data Set (MDS, resident assessment tool), dated [DATE], indicated, Resident 2 was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-29 · tag F0777 — isolatedProvide or obtain x-rays/tests when ordered and promptly tell the ordering practitioner of the results.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to promptly notify the physician of result that falls outside of clinical reference ranges for one of 4 sampled residents (Resident 2) when there was no evidence if the nurse notified the physician between 6/17/23 and 6/19/23 of the X-ray result, dated 6/16/23. This failure had the potential to delay appropriate care and treatment for Resident 2. Findings: Review of Resident 2' s clinical record indicated, Resident 2 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including malignant neoplasm of overlapping sites of brain (a cancer that overlaps contiguous sites of brain and whose point of origin cannot be determined), aftercare following surgery for neoplasm, dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), and limitation of activities due to disability. Review of Resident 2's Minimum Data Set (MDS, resident assessment tool), dated 6/27/23, indicated, Resident 2 was cognitively severely impaired. Review of Resident 2's clinical document titled, Palliative Care (an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-28 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement its care plan intervention of hourly rounding (checking in with a patient once every hour to proactively address needs) for one of four sampled Residents (Resident 2) after a substantiated claim of resident-to-resident abuse. This failure has the potential to result in Resident 2 ' s continued behavioral issues and puts Resident 2 and other residents at risk for abuse. Findings: A review of Resident 2 ' s face sheet (summary of resident ' s demographic and admitting information) provided on 9/27/23 at 5:49 PM indicated, Resident 2 was admitted on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses including vascular dementia (problems with reasoning, planning, judgment, memory, and thought process due to brain damage from damaged blood flow to the brain), severe with agitation .violent behavior and other symptoms and signs involving cognitive functions and awareness. A review of Resident 2 ' s Minimum Data Set (MDS, a tool used to measure health status in nursing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-29 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to accurately assess residents Morse Fall Assessment (an assessment to determine the likelihood of a resident falling and why. The assessment then categorizes the resident as a low, medium, or high fall risk), provide supervision according to facility policy, and when a high fall risk was identified the facility failed to update the care, and conduct an Interdisciplinary team for three out of 15 Residents reviewed (Residents 2,3,4). This failure resulted in 1. Resident 2 falling on 11/06/23 and sustaining a right hip fracture (broken bone) 2. Resident 3 obtaining a fall on 11/02/22 and being admitted to the intensive care unit in an acute hospital for monitoring for bleeding in the brain. 3. Resident 4 falling on 1/31/23 and sustaining a left hip fracture. Findings for Resident 2: Review of Resident 2 ' s Minimum Data Set (MDS, assessment tool for residents) dated 11/6/22 Resident 2 was admitted on [DATE], is cognitively independent (able to understand and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-29 · tag F0552 — isolatedEnsure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review facility failed to use interpreter services to communicate with Resident 1 regarding care, and failed to include Resident1 and their family in care planning, for one out of 14 Residents reviewed ( Resident 1). This failure resulted in Resident 1 being unable to communicate with staff and relaying her needs and concerns (i.e., when roommates tv is loud and she wants to rest), unable to express her want to go home and obtain rehab to get stronger, unable to ask for assistance for home health, and the resident and family unable to participate in care. This failure left Resident 1 feeling frustrated, helpless, alone, and feeling like she is unwanted and uncared for. Review of Resident 1 ' s MDS (Minimum Data Set, tool used for a comprehensive Resident assessment) dated 6/7/23 indicates Resident is alert, Spanish speaking only, and is admitted with diagnoses including end stage renal diseases requiring Hemodialysis, osteoarthritis, and chronic osteomyelitis. During an observation and interview on 7/6/23 at 10:00 am in Resident 1 ' s…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-17 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on Interview and record review, the facility failed to assess Resident 1's wound condition for one of three residents reviewed. This failure had potential to result to Resident 1's delayed of wound healing. Findings: During review of Resident 1 ' s clinical record, Resident 1 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses included after care following surgery for neoplasm (abnormal growth of cells), oligodendroglioma (rare type of brain tumor), Pressure Ulcer (Bedsore). During Review of Resident 1 ' s clinical record, dated 6/24/23 titled Wound assessment weekly Pelvic 1. No assessment on slough % and Pain with treatment. No assessment when wound identified. During Review of Resident 1 ' s clinical record, dated 6/24/23 titled Wound assessment weekly Pelvic 2. No assessment on Pain with treatment. During Review of Resident 1 ' s clinical record, dated 7/14/23 titled Wound assessment weekly Pelvic 1. No assessment on when wound identified. During an interview with RN 1 on 8/25/23 at 10:10am, stated Blank on pain…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-06-27 · tag F0801 — widespreadEmploy sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Certified Dietary Manager (CDM), the position responsible for supervision of daily foodservice operations, was fully qualified when he did not have six hours of in-service training on the specific California dietary service requirements contained in Title 22 of the California Code of Regulations prior to assuming his full-time duty at the facility. This failure had the potential for inadequate supervision of the dietary department for 337 residents who ate food from the kitchen out of a census of 337. Findings: State of California Health and Safety Code 1265.4(b)(4) describes the required qualifications for the full-time Director of Food Services (DFS). The Statue indicates a DFS who is a graduate of a dietetic services training program approved by the Dietary Managers Association and is a certified dietary manager, must have received at least six hours of in-service training on the specific California dietary service requirements contained in Title 22 of the California Code of Regulations prior to assuming…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-06-27 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — patternHonor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the resident or family group views were considered and acted upon grievances and recommendations, when not all residents were invited to have participated in resident council monthly meeting. This failure had the potential to result to ineffective residents' consensus-building. Findings: During resident council meeting on 6/21/23, at 2:15 pm, Resident 142 stated that the facility had not invited residents' representative for every unit in the facility to participate in the resident council meeting every month. During resident council meeting on 6/21/23 at 2:00 PM, four (Resident 54, 61, 119 and 164) of seven residents stated they were not aware how to file grievances and if they have a system in place to voice out their issues or concerns. During interview with Resident 164 on 6/21/23 at 2:15 pm, Resident 164 stated that she's not free to voice out concerns for the fear that how the staff will treat them differently. During interview with Resident 119 on 6/21/23 at 2:20 pm, Resident 119 stated that Resident 142…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-06-27 · tag F0577 — patternAllow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure current survey results were readily available to residents for every unit for three of three observations of the facility survey report book, which had the potential to affect all residents in the facility. Findings: During tour of the four units (G4, G5 and K2) including the secured unit on 6/21/23 and 6/22/23 at 4:00 pm, an observation was made that survey results were not posted. There was no notice posted in the facility units regarding the availability and location of recent survey results. During the resident council meeting on 6/21/23 at 2:00 PM, seven of seven residents revealed they had no knowledge of the location of the survey results binder. They also stated they were not aware where they were located and had not seen any signage that directed residents to their location in which they don't have to ask. During interview with CNA 1 on 6/22/23 at 3:00 pm, regarding the location of the survey results, she stated I would assume they would be upfront. She stated if family asked for the results, she would locate…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-06-27 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — patternHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were made aware and/or educated on how to voice grievances to either the facility or other agency that hears grievances without fear of discrimination or reprisal, and that prompt efforts were made to resolve grievances the resident may have. This failure had the potential to affect resident's right to voice their concerns and have any grievance be acknowledged and processed by the facility in a timely manner. Findings: During the resident council meeting on 6/21/23 at 2:00 PM, four of seven residents stated they're not aware how to file grievances to voice out their issues or concerns. They're not aware if they have a system in place. In an interview with Resident 164 stated that she's not free to voice out her concerns for the fear that how the staff will treat them differently. During interview with the DON on 6/21/23 at 2:30 pm, DON stated they have this so called Talk to Me system (application software- based). DON acknowledged that they have to educate the residents on how to utilize this to voice…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-06-27 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — patternEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and a review of records, it was found that the facility failed to maintain a medication error rate of less than 5%. During the medication pass, two medication errors were observed out of twenty-seven opportunities, resulting in an error rate of 7.41%. 1. A review on 6/21/23 of Resident 120's physician's orders indicated (Timolol maleate 0.5% eye gel forming solution, 1 drop both eyes ) Timolol is a medication used to treat glaucoma. Glaucoma is a condition when there is too much pressure in the eye. This pressure can be bad for your eyes because it can damage the delicate parts inside. During an observation on 6/21/23 at 7:52 am, LVN 1 was observed administering Timolol solution to Resident 120. It was noted that the resident's left eye was closed when the eyedrop was instilled. Resident 120 did not receive the Timolol eye drop in her left eye. During an interview with LVN 1 on 6/21/23 at 10:25 am, it was revealed that the LVN 1 administered the Timolol eye drop medication to the resident's right eye but not the left eye. LVN 1 stated that the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-06-27 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe and sanitary conditions were met for food storage when: 1.There was an undated blueberry sauce container in the refrigerator in the kitchen. 2.There was an expired crushed red pepper container in the kitchen. 3.There were undated individual condiments (such as Smucker's Strawberry Jam, Smucker's Sugar Free Blackberry Jam, Smucker's Pure Honey, Smucker's Sugar Free Breakfast Syrup and Jif Creamy Peanut Butter) in the original undated bottom of cardboard box containers in the storage room in the kitchen. These failures had the potential to put residents at risk for foodborne illnesses. Findings: 1. During a concurrent observation and interview on 6/20/23 at 9:50 AM with the Director of food services (DFS), Clinical Nutrition Manager (CNM), and Executive Chef (EC) in the kitchen, there was an undated red colored top of blueberry sauce container in the refrigerator. The EC stated, No when asked if she could see the date on it. She also stated, They should've used open date and used date when asked…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-06-27 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain effective infection prevention and control program when: 1.Nasal cannulas (a device used to deliver supplemental oxygen) were not covered and had no information on replacement or discard dates for 6 residents (Resident A, Resident B, Resident C, Resident 10, Resident 44, and Resident 210). 2.Extended use of N-95 respirators and face shields were stored in the same paper bags. 3.Trash containers in the clean and dirty areas of the laundry department had no lid covers. 4.There was no evidence of preventive maintenance for washers, dryers and [NAME] used in the laundry department. 5. Nebulizer masks were not covered and labed for Residents 44 and 19. These failures had the potential to result to spread infections among staff, residents, and visitors. Findings: 1. During an initial tour of the resident rooms on 6/20/23 that began at 9:31 AM, with the Unit Nurse Manager (UNM) 1 present, the UNM 1 confirmed the following: a) The nasal…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-06-27 · tag F0557 — isolatedHonor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one (Resident 334) of three residents reviewed for personal inventory form was completed and signed. This failure had the potiental to result in theft or loss of resident's personal effects. Findings: During review of Resident 334's addmission/discharge personal effects dated 05/10/2023 indicated there was no recording of personal effects or signatures of charge nurse and reponsible party. During interview with unit nurse manager (UNM 1) on 6/27/23 at 9:30am, UNM 1 stated that charge nurses were responsible for intake paperwork including admission/discharge personal effects. The facility policy and procedure titled Inventory of Belongings/Valuables dated 7/2023, indicated Upon admission, an itemized three-part Inventory Form will be completed by appropriate staff in the resident's/patient's/representative's presence to account for belongings brought into the facility. The resident/patient or their representative will receive a copy of this form upon admission to the Unit. Upon discharge from the Unit/facility, the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-27 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility did not develop and implement a comprehensive, person-centered care plan for Resident 189's use of Olanzapine (an antipsychotic medication) when the care plan did not indicate target behavior/s and known or common side effect/s for which the medication was used for. This failure had the potential to not ensure the medical, nursing, mental and psychosocial needs are identified, addressed, and/or met by the resident, and monitored by staff. Findings: Resident 189 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included left hip fracture, heart failure, depression, and mild dementia (loss of mental functions that interferes daily life and activities). Review of Resident 189's physician orders indicated the following: Olanzapine 5 mg [milligram] tablet . Order Date: 6/9/2023 Diagnoses: DIAGNOSIS EXEMPT Frequency (Scheduled): One Time Daily (Starting 6/10/2023 1900 [7 pm]) Notes: [blank] Instructions: [blank] . Review of Resident 189's care plan, dated 5/31/23, indicated the following: Problems - Antipsychotic Use - [resident name…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-27 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free of accident hazards when one (Resident 245) of three residents' electrical appliances were not approved by underwriters laboratories (UL, accepted certification mark for safety standards). Findings: During observation on 6/20/23 at 10:22 am, Resident 245 had the following appliances were found in his room with no UL mark sticker: small air purifier, laptop, mini-ref held on top of box with duct tape, electric kettle, and pot. During interview with UNM 4 on 6/23/23 at 9:10 am, UNM 4 stated that it has been long while since the appliances were there in his room. During interview with maintenance supervisor (MS) on 6/23/23 at 10:00 am, he acknowledged the elecrical appliances had no UL stickers and stated that those should be checked by the facility IDT before taking in the residents' room, to ensure that it's UL approved. The facility's policy and procedure titled Electrical Appliances revised date 12/2000, indicated Only authorized electrical appliances will be permitted and approved…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-06-27 · tag F0745 — failed to provide medically-related social services — isolatedProvide medically-related social services to help each resident achieve the highest possible quality of life.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure medically-related social services was provided to Resident 42. This failure had the potential to not ensure appropriate social services were provided to help attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. Findings: Resident 42 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included heart failure (a condition wherein the heart cannot pump enough blood as it should), hypertension (high blood pressure), diabetes (abnormal blood sugar levels) and history of right below knee amputation. During a concurrent interview and record review of Resident 42's medical records on 6/23/23 at 11:47 AM, with the Social Worker (SW) 1, SW 1 stated Resident 42 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and that the resident was his own decision maker. When asked, SW 1 stated, she did not see any record that the social worker had visited the resident since admission into the facility. SW 1 said, I can't tell why…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-06-27 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and review of records, it has been determined that the facility did not ensure the accurate administration of all drugs and biologicals for one of three residents under review. Specifically, during the administration of an insulin injection to Resident 201, it was observed that the injection was administered on the same site, which could have potentially led to adverse medication consequences. Findings: A review on 6/21/23 of the Insulin Lispro and Insulin Glargine Manufacturer's insert it is advised to rotate the injection site with each administration to minimize the potential for adverse reactions such as pits/lumps or thickened skin. Insulin Lispro may be injected in the stomach area, thigh, buttocks, or back of the upper arm. A review on 6/21/23 of the facility's policy and procedure on Section 8.14 Injectable Medication Administration, it is indicated that the administration of injectable medications should be thoroughly documented, including the specific site used and any unusual reactions observed. Furthermore, in the case of any reactions, it is…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-06-27 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and record reviews, it has been determined that the facility's pharmacist neglected to report medication irregularities concerning two residents (201 and 39). This failure had the potential to lead to undetected medication irregularities. Findings: Upon reviewing the facility's policy on Medication Regimen Review (MRR), it was found that the clinical pharmacist is responsible for conducting a comprehensive review of each resident's medical record at least monthly. The goal of the MRR is to promote positive outcomes, minimize adverse consequences, and identify and report medication errors or irregularities. Any irregularities, findings, and recommendations are reported to the Director of Nursing, attending Physician, and Medical Director. During a review on 6/21/23 of Resident 39's medication administration record (MAR) dated 6/2023, it was noted that there was no documentation of the insulin injection site after the medication was administered by licensed nurses. During an interview with LVN 1 on 6/21/23, LVN 1 stated she had administered both Insulin Lantus and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-06-27 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one (Resident 72) of three residents reviewed remained free from unnecessary medications when Resident 72 did not have specific behavioral monitoring for the use of zyprexa (antipsychotic, to reduce psychosis-related symptoms). This failure had the potential to result to medication adverse effects. Findings: Review of Resident 72's clinical record, Resident 72 was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses included Alzheimer's (memory loss), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD, group of lung diseases that block airflow and make it difficult to breathe) and presence of cardiac pacemaker (medical device implanted to help heart beat at a normal rate and rhythm). Review of Resident 72's physician's order dated 6/15/23, indicated zyprexa 2.5 mg tab (1/2 tab = 1.25 mg) BID oral - gradual dose reduction. Review of Resident 72's behavioral monitoring record and care plan dated 6/2023 did not indicate specific behavior for the use of zyprexa. During…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-06-27 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure: 1.There was a specific condition, diagnosis, and/or indication for use for Resident 189's Olanzapine (an anti-psychotic medication) medication. 2.There was monitoring of targeted behaviors for Resident 189's Olanzapine medication. These failures could result in unnecessary use of, ineffective and/or lack of monitoring for an anti-psychotic medication that could negatively affect the resident's highest practicable mental, physical and psychosocial well-being. Findings: Resident 189 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included left hip fracture, heart failure, depression, and mild dementia (loss of mental functions that interferes daily life and activities). Review of Resident 189's physician orders indicated the following: Olanzapine 5 mg [milligram] tablet . Order Date: 6/9/2023 Diagnoses: DIAGNOSIS EXEMPT Frequency (Scheduled): One Time Daily (Starting 6/10/2023 1900 [7 pm]) Notes: [blank] Instructions: [blank] . Review of Resident 189's Medication Records (MR), for June 2023, indicated the resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-06-27 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — isolatedDispose of garbage and refuse properly.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure proper disposal of garbage when there were no lids on two out of nine garbage containers in the loading dock. This failure had the potential to result to spread of infections among residents in the facility. Findings: During an observation on 6/21/23 at 10:10 AM in the loading dock of the facility, there were no lids on two out of nine garbage containers. One black colored garbage container was open without a lid and another black colored garbage container was overflown with garbage without the lid. During an interview on 6/21/23 at 10:15 AM with EVS Manager (EM, environmental services manager)/Facility Operations, in the loading dock, EM verified they were garbage containers. EM stated, There are no lids. They are broken. Review of the facility's policy and procedure titled, Section: Sanitation and Infection Prevention/Control Subject: Solid Waste Disposal revised in January 2023 indicated, . Garbage containers are clean . and covered at all times . Review of the facility's policy and procedure…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-06-27 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure medical records were maintained for one of three residents reviewed, when there was no informed consent for Resident 189 completed for use of olanzapine (an antipsychotic medication.) This failure had the potential to not provide sufficient information that reflected the residents' condition, care and services provided, and to not ensure information is available to staff and/or other individuals who may use and/or need it to facilitate communication. Findings: Resident 189 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included left hip fracture, heart failure, depression, and mild dementia (loss of mental functions that interferes daily life and activities). Review of Resident 189's physician orders indicated the following: Olanzapine 5 mg [milligram] tablet . Order Date: 6/9/2023 Diagnoses: DIAGNOSIS EXEMPT Frequency (Scheduled): One Time Daily (Starting 6/10/2023 1900 [7 pm]) Notes: [blank] Instructions: [blank] . Review of Resident 189's medication records (MR), for June 2023, indicated the resident was given…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-06-27 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure policies and procedures were followed for pneumococcal vaccination when medical records for one of five sampled residents (Resident 271) did not have documentation that the resident received pneumococcal immunization. This failure did not ensure the risk for acquiring, transmitting, or experiencing complications from pneumococcal disease was minimized for Resident 271. Findings: During a review on 6/27/23 at 9:10 AM, Resident 271's Immunization Consent, for pneumococcal immunization vaccine was reviewed. Resident 271's consent was marked yes, and the consent was dated and signed on 11/4/22. During a review of a facility document on 6/27/23, titled, Immunization Report, the report indicated names of residents who received pneumococcal vaccine, including the administration date. The report did not include the name and date of vaccine administration for Resident 271. During an interview on 6/27/23 at 12:01 PM, with the Infection Preventionist (IP), IP was unable to provide information when Resident 271 received the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HEBREW HOME FOR AGED DISABLED | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 04/25/1980 |
| ARRICK, DAVID | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 07/01/2021 |
| DAVIS, JAMES | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 06/17/2015 |
| DIAMOND, SUSAN | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 01/01/2024 |
| EISLER, JESSICA | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 06/17/2015 |
| FAYNE, STEVEN | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 01/26/2017 |
| FIEDOTIN, RICHARD | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 01/01/2024 |
| FINE, HOWARD | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 12/05/2013 |
| GERSHUNY, MATTHEW | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 01/24/2018 |
| GOLDIN, DAVID | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 09/25/2019 |
| GREEN, ADRIENNE | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 06/26/2019 |
| JAHAN, VALERIE | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 07/01/2021 |
| KLAPPER, LAURA | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 06/24/2020 |
| LOWI, DAVID | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 04/26/2012 |
| MANN, ALEX | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 12/08/2011 |
| PLAYER, JUDITH | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 01/20/2021 |
| SECORE, JASON | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 07/01/2022 |
| SHARP, SOPHIE | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 06/17/2015 |
| TA, HANH | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/11/2024 |
| BEUTLER, KEVIN | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 10/04/2021 |
| CABIGAO, EDWIN | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 03/03/2025 |
| GERLACH, CARL | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 02/03/2025 |
| PALESKY LEWIS, STACEY | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 06/30/2022 |
| POMERANZ, WILLIAM | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 01/01/2023 |
| TANG, YUK PING | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 03/01/2021 |
| BRAY, ROSABELLA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 07/01/2011 |
| GECHT, ELAINE | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/15/2025 |
| YUKAWA, MICHI | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/15/2025 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 39 rows in the source record cover these 28 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
What families pay in CA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 055169. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-02-12, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.