No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

A Grace Sub Acute & Skilled Care

1250 S. Winchester Boulevard, San Jose, CA 95128 · For profit - Corporation · 166 certified beds · (408) 241-3844 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (408) 241-3844 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citation — no harm found (F0609) — cited Jun 2019Behavioral-health or dementia-care citations — no harm found (F0740, F0758)
Insights

This home’s record is mixed — some reassuring signs, some worth asking about.

In its favor
  • a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
  • lower-than-typical staff turnover (20% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (47) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

4/5
CMS overall
4 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 3 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 4 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★ 2/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
1321 S Winchester Blvd Ste 335 · (800) 472-3844 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
1550 Winchester Blvd Ste 107 · (408) 378-5381 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
3145 Payne Ave · (408) 564-4457 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 4 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 4 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating4★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased11.6%10.2%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight5.5%4.0%5.4%typical
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.9%0.8%0.9%typical
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.2%1.2%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms0.6%7.3%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.4%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury0.2%1.6%3.3%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened8.1%9.8%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication10.9%13.7%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine96.2%98.2%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers4.4%4.3%4.7%typical
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control3.3%10.2%21.2%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table4.9%12.0%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.0%1.5%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine88.6%93.2%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission16.3%23.0%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit6.5%11.2%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.522.251.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days0.711.571.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

29.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 30 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

29.0%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
26.1%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.10U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.05hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.04hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.01hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 26.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 23 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.10 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 6% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 36% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF29.0%CMS range 11.9–53.951.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge26.1%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge26.1%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge26.1%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified98.4%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization8.2%CMS range 4.4–13.07.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.251.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

1.12
RN hours/ resident / day
1.42
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.80
Aide hours/ resident / day
5.35
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.99
RN hoursweekends
19.6%
Total nursing turnover
27.6%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 166 beds and averages 126.2 residents a day — about 76% occupied, or roughly 40 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 5.35 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.12 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.80 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 5.07 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.46 on weekdays — 7% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.17 to 0.99 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 20% is below the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

13
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2024-10-18)
15
at the previous standard inspection (2022-05-13)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

47 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 37 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-14 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure pharmacy services were provided to meet the needs of one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) when medications were not available to be administered as ordered. This failure had the potential to compromise the resident's health and safety.Findings:Review of Resident 1's medical record indicated he was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses including traumatic brain injury and epilepsy (a brain disorder that causes seizures [bursts of electrical activity in the brain that can cause changes in behavior, movements, and levels of consciousness]).Review of Resident 1's physician's orders indicated he had the following medication orders, dated 7/1/25: 1.) Clobazam (medication used to treat seizures) oral suspension 2.5 milligrams per milliliter (mg/ml, unit of dose measurement) give 8 ml via gastrostomy tube (GT, a tube inserted through the abdomen and into the stomach) two times a day; and 2.) Lacosamide (medication used to treat…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-18 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — pattern
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure professional standards of practice were followed for five out of 22 sampled residents (Residents 25, 35, 75, 93, and 98) when: For Residents 25, 35, 93, and 98, there were incomplete physicians orders, which had the potential for unsafe implementation of the orders and untimely treatment or intervention residents' medical conditions. For Resident 75, the staff took the blood pressure (BP) on the same arm where the resident has the AV fistula (arteriovenous fistula, connection that's made between an artery and a vein for dialysis access), did not monitor her intake and output (the measurement of the fluids that enter the body and the fluids that leave the body). The failures had the potential to cause injury and unmonitored medical condition. Findings: 1. A review of Resident 93's clinical record indicated an order for Admelog [insulin lispro, a short-acting insulin to lower blood sugar] Injection Solution 100 UNIT/ML [milliliter]…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-10-18 · tag F0700 — pattern
    Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to offer and/or attempt alternatives prior to the use of side rails (or bed rails, adjustable rigid bars attached to the side of a bed [examples include safety rails, grab bars, and assist bars]) for 18 of 22 sampled residents (Residents 66, 38, 75, 77, 13, 4, 9, 5, 73, 57, 29, 54, 98, 6, 99, 28, 82, and 16) and 77 nonsampled residents. This failure had the potential to place the residents at risk of entrapment and serious injury. Findings: 1. During an observation in Resident 66's room on 10/14/24 at 8:41 a.m., Resident 66 was sitting in bed. Resident 66's bed had both upper half side rails. Review of Resident 66's physician order, dated 10/04/24 indicated he had an order for (1/2) Both Upper Side Rail up for positioning and easy bed mobility. Review of Resident 66's Side Rails care plan indicated an intervention, Identify and use appropriate alternatives prior to installing side rails. Review of Resident 66's Side Rail Assessment, dated 10/07/24 indicated there was no documentation that the facility offered…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-18 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure accurate accountability of controlled drugs (medications that can be easily abused and are under strict government control) and document medication administration as in accordance with the facility policy and procedures (P&P) for 3 out of 5 residents (Residents 35, 39, and 85). The failure had the potential for medication errors and controlled drug abuse or diversion (when healthcare providers obtain or use prescription medicines illegally). Findings: During an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 10/15/24 at 3:40 p.m., she explained that each time a resident requested an as-needed controlled medication, the nurse assesses the resident, reviews the physician's order, signs it out of the CDR, administers the medication to the resident, documents the medication administration on the MAR, and re-assesses the resident for effectiveness of the medication within one hour. 1. A review of Resident 39's clinical record indicated a physician's order, dated 12/11/23, for diazepam (a controlled medication to treat…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-18 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure food was stored, prepared, and served in accordance with professional standards for food safety when: 1. Undated food items, food past their used by date, bananas with black spots, partially soft and ruined tomatoes, dry green onion were found in the refrigerator and on the shelves in the kitchen; 2. A tube of Auto-Chlor test strips (used to test the chemical concentration of cleaning solutions to ensure that sanitizers are used appropriately in dishwashers, sinks, and buckets) was expired; and 3. Dietary supervisor (DS) did not sanitize the contaminated thermometer before checking the temperature of the lemonade. These failures had the potential to cause the growth of micro-organisms which could cause foodborne illness and cross-contaminated food for the 44 residents eating at the facility. Findings: 1. On 10/15/24, at 9:15 a.m., during an observation of the kitchen's storage shelves and in the walk-in refrigerator, with the registered dietician (RD) and the dietary supervisor (DS), the following were…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-18 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure proper infection prevention techniques were followed when: 1. two oxygen concentrators had dirty filters, 2. a nurse did not wear appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE), two times during medications pass, for one of six residents who was on enhanced barrier precautions (a set of infection control measures that use gowns and gloves during high-contact care activities to reduce the spread of multidrug-resistant organisms), and 3. during personal care, the urine collection bag for one of 17 residents with a urinary catheter (a tube which is used to allow urine to drain if you have an obstruction in the tube that carries urine out of your bladder), was placed on the mattress of the bed. These failures had the potential of spreading facility acquired infections to vulnerable residents who are already immunocompromised. Findings: 1. During an observation on 10/14/24 at 9 a.m., the oxygen concentrator filter, in room R2, had a layer of greyish dust on it. During an observation and subsequent…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-18 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide accommodation of needs for one of 22 residents (Resident 81) when Resident 81 did not have the appropriate staff call device (call button) that she would be able to use if she needed to call for assistance. This failure had the potential to result in the resident not getting assistance timely and delay necessary care and services. Findings: Review of Resident 81's clinical record indicated she was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including respiratory failure and quadriplegia (complete or partial paralysis from the neck down, including legs, and arms, usually due to a spinal cord injury). Review of Resident 81's Nursing admission Screening/History, dated 9/16/24 indicated the resident was alert x 4 (alert to person, place, time and event). Review of Resident 81's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a federally mandated resident assessment tool), dated 10/2/24 indicated her Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS, an assessment tool used by facilities to screen and identify memory, orientation, and judgement…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-18 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a baseline care plan was completed within 48 hours of admission for two of 22 sampled Residents (Resident 66 and Resident 25). This failure had the potential for the residents and/or responsible party (RP) to be unaware of the plan of care. Findings: During a review of Resident 66's Baseline Care Plan (BCP), dated 10/04/2024, the BCP indicated Resident 66 was admitted on [DATE]. It also indicated the following were left blank: Therapy Services, BCP Completion Date, Date Reviewed With Resident/Representative, Staff Name and Signature, Resident signature, Representative Name and Signature. During a review of Resident 25's BCP, dated 10/10/2024, the BCP indicated Resident 25 was admitted on [DATE]. It also indicated the following were left blank: Safety, BCP Completion date, Date Reviewed With Resident/Representative, Resident signature, Representative Name and Signature. During an interview with Nurse Supervisor M (NS M) on 10/18/24 at 11:20 a.m.,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-18 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the consultant pharmacist (CP) failed to identify and report irregularities to the facility during the monthly regimen review (MRR) for two out of 20 sampled residents (Residents 5 and 93). The failure resulted in an unsafe order without being clarified for Resident 93, and Resident 5 not receiving the medication in accordance with the manufacturer's specifications to optimize drug therapy. Findings: 1. A review of Resident 93's clinical record indicated an order for Admelog [insulin lispro, a short-acting insulin to lower blood sugar] Injection Solution 100 UNIT/ML [milliliter] . Inject 3 ml [milliliters] subcutaneously [injection under the skin] as needed for DM [diabetes mellitus], dated 7/19/2024. The order had a dose of 3 ml which would be equal to 300 units of insulin; and did not have a frequency and parameters, such as blood sugar (BS} above certain readings, when to give it. During a concurrent interview and record review with Registered Nurse B (RN B) on 10/15/24 at 10:29 a.m., he reviewed Resident 93's Admelog order and stated he…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-18 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure two out of 22 sampled residents (Residents 35 and 98) were free from unnecessary medications when Resident 35 received warfarin (a blood thinner to prevent blood clots) for a wrong indication; and Resident 98's lidocaine patch (a topical medication applied to the skin for pain) was not administered in accordance with the manufacturer's specifications. This deficient practice resulted inadequate indication for medication use; and the potential for adverse effects of medication. Findings: 1. A review of Resident 35's clinical record indicated he was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including chronic embolism and thrombosis of other specified veins (conditions that involve blood clots and can lead to serious complications) and saddle embolus of pulmonary artery with acute cor pulmonale (condition occurs when a large blood clot becomes lodged at the intersection where the main pulmonary artery divides and branches off into the left and right lungs). A review of Resident 35's physician's orders…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 37 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-18 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility had a medication error rate of 5.56% when two medication errors occurred out of 36 opportunities during the medication administration for 2 out of 6 residents (Residents 67 and 93). The failures resulted in the nursing staff not following the facility's policy and procedures (P&P) and had the potential for the residents not receiving full therapeutic effects or complications of medications. Findings: 1. During the medication administration observation on 10/14/24 at 9:15 a.m., Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) A was observed preparing and administering 15 medications to Resident 67. Included in the medications was an oral inhaler called Alvesco (medication for asthma). After shaking the Alvesco inhaler, LVN A gave it to the resident and asked her to press on the inhaler and inhale deeply. After she finished, LVN A asked Resident 67 to repeat by giving herself another puff without allowing some time in between the inhalations. There was about 4 or 5-second time lapse between the 2 puffs. During an interview shortly after…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-18 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide meals with food items according to preferences and dislikes for two of 44 residents (55 and 67). This failure had the potential to result in meal dissatisfaction, decreased intake, and leading to compromised nutritional and medical status for the residents. Findings: Review of Resident 55's admission Record indicated he was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident 67's admission Record indicated she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. During a tray line observation with the dietary supervisor (DS) on 10/15/24, at 12:35 p.m., Resident 55's lunch ticket indicated he preferred to have a cheeseburger every day, but a cheeseburger was not served for him. Resident 67's lunch ticket indicated she disliked rice, but rice was served for her. During a concurrent interview with the DS, she confirmed that Resident 55's lunch ticket indicated he preferred to have a cheeseburger every day, but a cheeseburger was not served for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-18 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolated
    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of 27 initial pool residents (Resident 1) had access to a staff call device (call button), in case of needing help or for an emergency. This failure had the potential of Resident 1 becoming seriously harmed or even lead to death. Findings: During an observation in Room R3 on 10/14/24 at 8:40 a.m., the call button for bed A was observed hanging on the wall above the head of the bed, not within reach of Resident 1. Resident 1 stated she can not reach the call button, and would want to call. During an observation in Room R3 on 10/14/24 at 12:28 p.m., the call button was still hanging on the wall. During an observation in Room R3 on 10/14/24 3:17 p.m., the call button was still on the wall, out of reach of Resident 1. During an observation and subsequent interview with registered B (RN B) on 10/14/24 at 3:19 p.m., RN B took the call button off of the wall and handed it to Resident 1. RN B stated Resident 1 should have had the call button within reach. During a review of the facility's policy &…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-18 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolated
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain a safe, functional, and sanitary environment for one of 22 sampled residents (Resident 28) due to cracked walls near Resident 28's bathroom door and at the bottom left side of the toilet in the bathroom. This deficient practice had the potential to adversely affect the health and safety of residents in the facility. Findings: During an observation and interview with Resident 28 on 10/14/24 at 3:30 p.m., in Resident 28's room, Resident 28 stated about the cracked walls near her bathroom door and at the bottom, left side of the toilet in the bathroom. Resident 28 also stated that the walls were damaged and needed to be repaired. Resident 28 further stated that the facility was aware of the cracked walls near the bathroom door and the bottom left side of the toilet since last year. During a concurrent interview and record review with the maintenance director (MD) on 10/16/24 at 2:00 p.m., upon review of the maintenance log with the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-09 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete a Morse Fall Scale (an assessment used to determine a resident's risk for falls) after a fall for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1). This failure had the potential to compromise the facility's ability to identify fall risk factors and implement interventions accordingly. Findings: Review of Resident 1's medical record indicated he was admitted on [DATE] and had diagnoses including hemiplegia (one side of the body is paralyzed), disorientation (confusion), and muscle weakness. Review of Resident 1's Morse Fall Scale, dated 4/30/24, indicated Resident 1 was at moderate risk for falling. The instructions printed on the top of the Morse Fall Scale indicated, Complete on admission, quarterly, at change of condition, and after a fall. Review of Resident 1's situation, background, assessment, recommendation (SBAR, a communication tool), dated 5/10/24 and written by licensed nurse A (LN A), indicated Resident 1 was seen scooting out of bed.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-14 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Fall Morse Scale was completed accurately for one of two sampled residents (Resident 1). The failure to accurately assess residents ' fall risk has the potential to compromise the facility's ability to develop and implement resident-centered care plans and interventions for falls. Findings: Review of Resident 1 ' s medical record indicated he was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including anoxic brain damage (caused by a complete lack of oxygen to the brain), epilepsy (a brain condition that causes recurring seizures [a sudden, uncontrolled burst of electrical activity in the brain]), and metabolic encephalopathy (a problem in the brain caused by a chemical imbalance in the blood that may lead to personality changes). Review of Resident 1 ' s Interdisciplinary Team Progress Notes (IDT), dated 9/14/23 , indicated Resident 1 had an unwitnessed fall on 9/13/23. Resident 1 ' s Minimum Data Set (MDS, a resident assessment…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-28 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure care and treatment was provided in accordance with professional standards of practice for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) when: 1. A physician order for the wearing of a hand splint was not followed; 2. A physician order for the wearing of a knee brace was not followed; 3. RNA (Restorative Nursing Assistant) services were not provided as ordered; These failures resulted in Resident 1 not receiving proper treatment and had the potential to compromise Resident 1's health and well-being. Findings: 1. Review of Resident 1's clinical record indicated she was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including subarachnoid hemorrhage (bleeding into the fluid space surrounding the brain), aneurysm of carotid artery (bulging in one of the arteries supplying blood to the brain, head, face, and neck), and obstructive hydrocephalus (fluid build-up in the brain). Review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS, assessment tool), dated 8/21/23, indicated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-05-13 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — pattern
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    During an observation on 5/9/22 at 12:44 p.m., CNAs were seen passing out the lunchtime meal trays to the residents. There were two food carts parked in the hallway of station three and station four which contained the lunch trays of the residents. Two LNs were seen in the hallways of station three and four, standing by their medication carts, and were not participating in the passing of the lunch trays to the residents. During an interview with licensed vocational nurse D (LVN D) on 5/9/22 at 12:44 p.m., he was asked if he checked the contents of the meal trays before the CNAs distributed lunch to the residents on station three and station four. LVN D stated No I did not, I do it if I have time. During an interview with the director of nursing (DON) on 05/12/22 at 8:50 a.m., she stated Our process is to have the licensed nurses check the meal trays and make sure the food matches the diet tray card before the CNAs start passing the trays. During an observation and concurrent interview with licensed vocational nurse E (LVN E) on 05/12/22 at 12:17 p.m., lunch trays were being passed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-05-13 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure controlled medications (those with high potential for abuse and addiction) were fully accounted when: 1. Random controlled medication use audit for three of four sampled residents' (Residents 23, 48, and 71) as-needed controlled medications did not reconcile. The medications were signed out of the controlled drugs accountability sheet (Count Sheet, an inventory sheet that keeps record of the usage of controlled medications) but not documented on the Medication Administration Records (MAR) to indicate they were given to the residents. 2. Three of five controlled drug sign-in/sign out sheets (a sheet used to reconcile inventory of controlled medications in the medication cart by the incoming and outgoing nurse during a shift change) were missing signatures. These failures had the potential for misuse or diversion of controlled medications and inaccurate accountability of controlled medications. Findings: 1. The controlled medication Count Sheets for four random residents receiving as-needed controlled medications were…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-05-13 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — pattern
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility had a medication error rate of 15.63% when five medication errors occurred out of 32 opportunities during medication administration for four of five sampled residents (Residents 42, 53, 64, and 72). The deficient practice resulted in medications not given in accordance with the prescriber's orders and/or manufacturer's specifications, which may result in residents not receiving the full therapeutic effect of the medications and possible side effects for residents. Findings: 1. During a medication pass observation on 5/9/22, at 09:01 a.m., with licensed vocational nurse D(LVN D), he administered six medications to Resident 53, including a tablet of aspirin enteric coated (a pain reliever with a coating that creates a delayed release of the medication also prevents stroke) 81 milligrams (mg). A review of Resident 53's clinical record indicated a physician's order, dated 12/29/21, for aspirin low strength tablet chewable 81 mg give 1 tablet by mouth one time a day for stroke prevention. During a concurrent interview and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-05-13 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to follow proper sanitation and food handling practices when: 1. There were uncovered food items in the facility's kitchen freezer; 2. There was one unlabeled and undated pitcher of pink liquid in the reach-in refrigerator; and 3. Food service equipment was stored wet. These failures had the potential to cause food contamination and food-borne illness to 47 of 47 residents who received their food from the kitchen. Findings: 1. During the initial kitchen tour on 5/9/22 at 9:10 a.m., with the registered dietician (RD) inside the walk-in-freezer, a large bin containing a plastic bag of dinner rolls was observed. The bag of dinner rolls was open and exposed to the air. Another bin containing a plastic bag of corn dogs was observed to be open and exposed to the air. A third bin containing a plastic bag of bacon was observed to be open and exposed to the air. During a concurrent interview with the RD, he confirmed the plastic bags containing the dinner rolls, corn dogs, and bacon were open and exposed to the air in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-05-13 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure infection control practices were implemented when: 1. Licensed vocational nurse D (LVN D) did not perform hand hygiene in between tasks; 2. Face shield unattended on top of a cart parked in the hallway; 3. Certified nursing assistant K (CNA K) did not tie her isolation gown before entering an isolation room; 4. The restorative nursing assistant (RNA) did not follow the sequence in donning personal protective equipment (PPE). 5. Resident 25 did not have a daily Covid-19 screening monitoring; 6. LVN A did not perform hand hygiene in between changing gloves; 7. Irrigation syringe was hanging on the gastric tube (GT) machine. These failures could result in the spread of infection and cross-contamination that could affect the 87 residents who reside in the facility. Findings: 1. During an observation on 5/9/22 at 9:56 a.m., LVN D went to attend Resident 35, touched the resident's arm, left the room and went to his medication cart and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-05-13 · tag F0552 — isolated
    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to obtain an informed consent (process in which a health care provider educates a patient about the risks, benefits, and alternatives of a given procedure or intervention in order to obtain agreement or permission for care, treatment, or services) for an increased dose of an antipsychotic medication (a type of psychotropic medication to manage psychosis including delusions, hallucinations, paranoia, or disordered thought) for one of 23 sampled residents (Resident 48). This failure had the potential to compromise the right of the residents or responsible parties (RPs, persons designated to make decisions of behalf of the residents) to be fully informed regarding care and treatment to make health care decisions. Findings: A review of Resident 48's clinical record indicated she had been receiving Seroquel (an antipsychotic medication) 50 milligrams (mg, unit of measurement) twice daily for bipolar disorder (a disorder associated with episodes of mood swings ranging from depressive lows to manic highs) M/B (manifested by) angry…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-05-13 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to address resident's needs for one of three sampled residents (Resident 74) when Resident 74 was not able to reach for her call light. This failure had the potential for residents' needs not being met. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 5/9/22, at 8:42 a.m., with licensed vocational nurse A (LVN A) in Resident 74's room, Resident 74 was hitting the right siderail of her bed with her right hand. LVN A took the call light hanging on top of a gastric tube feeding machine (a device used for direct feeding to the stomach) situated on the left side of Resident 74. LVN A stated that the call light must be within reach of Resident 74. During an interview on 5/12/22, at 10:27 a.m., with certified nursing assistant H (CNA H), she stated that Resident 74 uses her right hand to use the call light. During an interview on 5/12/22, at 10:32 a.m., with registered nurse C (RN C), she stated that Resident 74 uses the call light for help. During an interview on 5/12/22, at 1:32 p.m., with the director of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-05-13 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to protect a residents' personal health information for one of three computer monitors. This failure had the potential for the public to see or access resident's personal medical and demographic information. Findings: During an observation of nursing staff administering medications to residents on 5/11/2022, at 10:35 a.m., one laptop was open with residents' personal health information on laptop screen unattended. During an interview on 5/11/2022, at 10:45 a.m., with registered nurse B (RN B), she stated that she got busy and forgot to log out before going into a resident room. During an interview on 5/13/22 at 10:05 a.m., with the director of nursing, she stated that after giving medications, the nurse must close the laptop screen. No personal health information should be left unattended. A review of the facility's policy titled, Protected Health Information (PHI), Management and Protection, dated April 2014, indicated that It is the responsibility of all personnel who have access to resident and facility…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-05-13 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide services to prevent contracture (condition leading to deformity) for two of nine sampled residents (Resident 77 and Resident 28) when: 1. Resident 77's lower extremities (legs and feet) did not have heel protectors (device to prevent deformity) applied on bilateral feet. 2. Resident 28 did not have a splint (device used to protect deformity) applied on his left arm as ordered. These failures had the potential to cause or worsen bone deformities. Findings: 1. During an observation on 5/9/22 at 8:58 a.m., in Resident 77's room, Resident 77's lower extremities did not have heel protectors. During a concurrent observation and interview on 5/9/22 at 3:40 p.m., with licensed vocational nurse A (LVN A) in Resident 77's room. Resident 77's soft heel protectors were inside the cabinet. LVN A stated she would check on the order for soft heel protector application. During a concurrent interview and record review on 5/10/22 at 10:23 a.m. with LVN A, LVN A stated that physician order, dated,11/15/2021, indicated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-05-13 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide timely assessment and intervention for pain for one of two sampled residents (Resident 68). This failure had the potential for increased pain and discomfort for Resident 68. Findings: During an observation on 5/9/22, at 10:20 a.m., in Resident 68's room, she was rubbing the left side of her face and grimacing. During an interview on 5/10/22, at 9:48 a.m., with certified nursing assistant F (CNA F), she informed the nurse of Resident 68's pain on the left side of her face about two weeks ago. During a review of Resident 68's clinical record dated 3/22/22, Resident 68 was admitted for cerebral vascular accident (disrupted blood flow to the brain), and trigeminal neuralgia (chronic pain condition affecting the trigeminal nerve, this nerve carries sensation from the face to the brain). During an observation on 5/11/22, at 9:52 a.m., in Resident 68's room, registered nurse B (RN B) assessed the resident for pain. During a follow-up interview on 5/11/22 at 9:58 a.m. with RN B, she stated that Resident 68…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-05-13 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents receiving dialysis (removal of waste and excess fluid from the body) treatment received care consistent with professional standards for one of one resident (Resident 23) when Resident 23's dialysis site dressing was not removed as ordered. This deficient practice had the potential for the resident to be inadequately assessed and be at risk for complications. Findings: Review of Resident 23's clinical record indicated he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including end stage renal disease (kidneys no longer functioning in permanent basis) and thrombosis (blood clot) due to vascular prosthetic devices, implants and grafts, subsequent encounter. Review of Resident 23's physician order dated 1/8/21 indicated Resident 23's dialysis days were Tuesdays and Thursdays from 6:15 a.m. to 9:15 a.m. Review of Resident 23's physician order dated 5/8/22 indicated remove dialysis dressing to left arm AV shunt (a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-05-13 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the consultant pharmacist (CP) failed to identify and report the irregular medication orders for two of seven sampled residents (Residents 64 and 84) in the monthly Medication Regimen Review (MRR). This failure resulted in medications not given in accordance with accepted standards of practice and had the potential for not meeting the residents' therapeutic needs or excessive use of medications for the residents. Findings: 1. During a medication administration observation on 5/10/22, at 08:47 a.m., licensed vocational nurse (LVN) J administered 1 tablet of vitamin D 1,000 International Units (IU, unit of potency for vitamins) via Resident 64's gastrostomy tube (G-tube, a tube inserted through the belly that brings nutrition directly to the stomach). During medications reconciliation, Resident 64's vitamin D order was: vitamin D tablet (cholecalciferol) give 1 tablet via G-tube two times a day for supplement. Start date 12/23/21. The order did not include a strength. During a concurrent interview and record review on 5/10/22, at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-05-13 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure two of 23 sampled residents (Residents 48 and 13) were free from unnecessary psychotropic medications (drugs that affects brain activities associated with mental processes and behaviors) when: 1. The facility increased Resident 48's Seroquel (an antipsychotic medication) for bipolar disorder (a disorder associated with episodes of mood swings ranging from depressive lows to manic highs) without adequate indication and documentation, and did not monitor the resident's lipid panel (a test that measures the amount of certain fat molecules called lipids in the blood) annually while the resident was on two antipsychotic medications. 2. For Resident 13, there was no specific behavior for the use of Seroquel. These failures had the potential for increased risks associated with psychotropic medication use that include but are not limited to sedation, anxiety, agitation, and memory loss. Findings: 1a. A review of Resident 48's clinical…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-05-13 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure proper medication storage and labeling of medications when: 1. Temperature monitoring was not consistently documented twice daily on the temperature log sheet, in May 2022, for one of two medication refrigerators; 2. Two insulin (medication to treat high blood sugar) pens had the pharmacy label on the caps instead of the body of the pens; 3. One opened tuberculin purified protein derivative (PPD, a solution used for tuberculin skin test) multi dose vial, one insulin pen, and an opened insulin vial were without the open date or discard date, to make sure they were not used beyond the discard date; 4. Two residents' expired medications were not removed from stock; 5. One unopened insulin vial was not labeled after removing from the refrigerator; 6. One pharmacy dispensed levetiracetam (medication to treat seizures) bottle was without an expiration date on the pharmacy label; 7. Three diabetisource ac (a tube feeding formula) was unattended on top of a cart in the hallway. The deficient practices had a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-05-13 · tag F0790 — failed to provide dental care — isolated
    Provide routine and 24-hour emergency dental care for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to assist and provide emergency dental care for one of two sampled residents (Resident 68). This failure had the potential for Resident 68 to suffer pain. Findings: During an observation on 5/09/22, at 10:20 a.m., in Resident 68's room, she was observed rubbing her left side of her face and grimacing. During an interview on 5/10/22, at 9:48 a.m., with certified nursing assistant F (CNA F), CNA F stated that she told the nurse and social services assistant (SSA) of Resident 68's dental pain two weeks ago. During a review of Resident 68's clinical record dated 3/22/22, Resident 68 was admitted for cerebral vascular accident (disrupted blood flow to the brain), and trigeminal neuralgia (chronic pain condition affecting the trigeminal nerve, this nerve carries sensation from the face to the brain). During a concurrent observation and interview on 5/11/22, at 9:52 a.m., with registered nurse B (RN B), in Resident 68's room, she assessed the resident for dental pain using a flashlight. She observed the inside of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-06-07 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to assure proper infection control practices was followed when: 1. Resident 382's undated used gastrostomy (GT, a surgical opening into the stomach for administration of nutrition and medications) syringe, opened unlabeled one gallon of distilled water were in the resident's room. 2. Resident 90 outdated nebulizer tubing was left on top of the machine. 3. Resident 131's suction machine (a device act or process of sucking) tubing was hanging and touching the floor. Findings: 1. During an observation on 6/4/19 at 9:47 a.m., undated GT syringe was at the bedside of Resident 382. During a concurrent observation and interview with licensed vocational nurse R (LVN R) on 6/4/19 at 9:53 a.m. She confirmed the above observation. LVN R further stated that it should have been dated. During an observation on 6/4/19 at 9:54 a.m., one gallon of opened unlabeled distilled water was in Resident 382's room. During a concurrent observation and interview with the LVN D on 6/4/19 at 9:57 a.m. She confirmed the above observation.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-06-07 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain a resident's privacy for two of 25 sampled residents (Residents 382 and 76) when their body was exposed from the waist down and could be viewed outside from the hallway. This failure had the potential to affect Residents 382 and 76's self-esteem and self-worth. Findings: 1. Review of Resident 382's clinical record indicated he had diagnosis of traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage (bleeding into the space between the surface of the brain) with loss of consciousness, epilepsy (disorder in which nerve cell activity in the brain is disturbed, causing seizures), tracheostomy (incision on the anterior aspect of the neck and opening a direct airway through an incision in the trachea), gastrostomy (surgery that makes a small opening through the skin into the stomach or intestine) and type 2 diabetes (condition that affects the way the body processes blood sugar (glucose). Resident 382's minimum data set (MDS, an assessment tool) dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-06-07 · tag F0552 — isolated
    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to obtain an informed consent for psychotropic medication (medication capable of affecting the mind, emotions, and behavior) for one of five sampled residents (Resident 36). This failure resulted in Resident 36 not being aware of the risks and benefits of taking psychotropic medications. Findings: Review of Resident 36's clinical record indicated she was re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses to include major depressive disorder( depression, a persistent feeling of sadness, and loss of interest). Review of Resident 36's physician orders' included Cymbalta (an antidepressant) delayed release 60 milligram (mg., a unit of measure on capsule by mouth one time a day for chronic pain management. Review of Resident 36's clinical record, Resident's Consent for use of Psychotropic Medications, dated 4/15/19, indicated there was no informed consent obtained from the Responsible Party. Resident 36 did not have the capacity to give informed consent. During an interview…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-06-07 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to notify all pertinent officials, in a timely manner, following an allegation of abuse for one of two residents (Resident 103) when Resident 103 had notified a staff member of her allegation. This failure had the potential to delay identification and implementation of appropriate corrective action and put the residents at risk for abuse. Findings: During an interview with Resident 103 on 6/3/19 at 9:02 a.m., she stated a certified nursing assistant (CNA) hurt her and put her in a cold shower, because she had a bowel movement and needed to be cleaned up and changed. During an interview with CNA A on 6/3/19 at 9:16 a.m., she stated Resident 103 had told her approximately three months prior about the alleged abuse, but she did not tell anyone. Review of the facility's policy, Abuse Prevention Policy dated 2/23/17, indicated employees and all health practitioners of the facility were mandated reporters. An employee who had knowleged or has been told by an elder or dependent adult that he/sshe experienced behavior…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-06-07 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Long Term Care Ombudsman (Ombudsman, an advocate for residents in the nursing homes) was notified in writing of a transfer for four of four residents (Residents 43, 78, 95 and 106). This failure had the potential of not providing the resident and/or their responsible party (RP, a person who is accountable in making decision in behalf of the resident) with access to an advocate who could inform them of their rights and from being inappropriately transferred. Findings: 1. Review of Resident 43's situation background assessment recommendation (SBAR, a form of communication used in healthcare settings) dated 4/23/19 indicated he was transferred to an acute care hospital. 2. Review of Resident 78's SBAR dated 3/30/19 indicated he was transferred to an acute care hospital. 3. During concurrent interview and record review with licensed vocational nurse F (LVN F) on 6/5/19 at 9:28 a.m., she reviewed respiratory therapist (RT, specialized healthcare practitioner for patients who have trouble in breathing) notes and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-06-07 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to accurately code the minimum data set (MDS, an assessment tool) for seven of 25 residents (Residents 8, 61, 104,35,45,125 and 108) when their MDS did not reflect the current status of the residents. This failure had the potential to affect inappropriate care planning and intervention. Findings: 1. During an initial tour on 6/3/19 at 8:56 a.m., Resident 8 stated she did not have dentures and showed her teeth. Resident 8 had upper and lower broken teeth. Review of Resident 8's MDS section L (Oral/Dental Status) dated 5/22/19 did not indicate a broken teeth assessment. During concurrent observation and interview with minimum data set coordinator M (MDSC M) on 6/4/19 at 3:42 p.m., MDSC M confirmed the above observation and stated the assessment was inaccurate. He stated the assessment should have reflected Resident 8's broken teeth. Review of Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS, a federal agency) Resident Assessment Instrument…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-06-07 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement an individualized person-centered comprehensive care plan for four of 25 residents (Residents 35, 43, 32 and 94) when: 1. Resident 35's hand roll intervention was not implemented; 2. Resident 43's care plan was not revised; 3. Resident 32's care plan was not developed for enoxaparin sodium (anticoagulant medication); and 4. Resident 94's care plan was not developed for zolpidem tartrate (sedative-hypnotic medication) and enoxaparin sodium. These deficient practices had the potential for the resident's needs not being met. Findings: 1. During an observation on 6/3/19 at 8:49 a.m., Resident 35's both hands had contractures (a deformity that caused of stiffness or constriction of connective tissues). There was a rolled towel on her left hand but nothing on the her right hand. During concurrent interview and record review with nursing supervisor L (NS L) on 6/7/19 at 11:06 a.m., she reviewed Resident 35's care plan and confirmed the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-06-07 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure appropriate treatment and services were provided for three of seven residents (Residents 35, 36, 43, and 107) when the restorative nursing assistant (RNA, program that helps residents to gain an improved quality of life by increasing their level of strength and mobility) program was not implemented. This deficient practice had the potential to result in residents' decline in range of motion. Findings: 1. Review of Resident 43's June 2019 physician orders did not indicate a RNA program order. During a concurrent interview and record review with licensed vocational F (LVN F) on 6/7/19 at 8:31 a.m., LVN F reviewed Resident 43's situation background assessment recommendation (SBAR, a form of communication used in health care settings) dated 4/23/19. LVN F confirmed Resident 43 was transferred to an acute hospital and returned to the facility on 5/16/19. During an interview with minimum data set coordinator N (MDSC N) on 6/6/19 at 12:58 a.m., he…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-06-07 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure appropriate treatment and management of a gastrostomy tube (G-tube, a tube inserted through abdomen that delivers nutrition and hydration directly to the stomach) was implemented for one of four sampled residents with G-tube (Resident 73). The facility failed to ensure a physician order was followed when the gastrostomy tube was not available for replacement when obstructed. This failure had the potential to delay the nutritional needs and compromise the health of the residents. Findings: Review of Resident 73's face sheet indicated he had diagnoses gastrostomy (a surgical operation for making an opening in the stomach), persistent vegetative state (a disorder of consciousness in which patients with severe brain damage), and diabetes (increase in blood sugar). Review of Resident 73's minimum data set (MDS, an assessment tool) dated 4/12/19, indicated persistent vegetative state, required assistance with bed mobility, dressing, toileting, personal hygiene and bathing. During an observation and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-06-07 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolated
    Ensure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure two of five residents (56 and 125) with behavior problems were adequately monitored. For Residents 56 and 125, the facility did not follow-up on psychiatric services (referral). This failure could potentially affect the residents' highest physical, mental and psychosocial well- being. Findings: 1. Review of Resident 56's clinical record on 6/7/19, indicated he was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses to include anxiety disorders (feelings of intense, excessive and persistent worry and fear about everyday situations). Review of Resident 56's minimum data set (MDS, an assessment tool) dated 3/29/19 indicated he was cognitively intact and he had verbal behavioral symptoms (i.e. angry outbursts) directed at staff. Review of Resident 56's physician orders' indicated he was on Depakote for mood instability manifested by angry outburst; Duloxetine for depression ( persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest) manifested by multiple…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-06-07 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure an accurate accounting of controlled substance (CS) medications (medications with a high risk for abuse and addiction) when random CS medication audits did not reconcile for seven of 19 residents (Residents 36, 37, 41, 59, 60, 88 and 382). This failure had the potential to result in the abuse or the misuse of controlled medications. Findings: 1. During an interview and record review with the director of nursing (DON) on 6/5/19 at 1:50 p.m., she compared the Medication Administration Record (MAR) and the corresponding Controlled Drug Record (CDR) of Residents 36, 37, 41, 59, 60, 88 and 382 for the month of April, May and June 2019. The DON further stated the narcotic medications were not properly accounted for and confirmed the following discrepancies: Resident 36's MAR did not reflect hydrocodone-acetaminophen (pain medication) 5-325 milligram (mg- unit of measure) being administered on 6/3/19 as it was recorded in her CDR. Resident 60's MAR did not reflect lorazepam (anxiety medication) 0.5 mg being administered on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-06-07 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the residents were free from unnecessary drugs for four of four sampled residents (Residents 128, 59, 36, and 43). Resident 128 who received lorazepam (antianxiety medication) ordered as needed (mg, unit of measurement) had no evidence of documentation the prescribing physician evaluated Resident 128 for the appropriateness of the medication. Resident 59 who received Lurasidone (Latuda) 120 milligram (mg, unit of measurement) daily for paranoid schizophrenia (a mental illness characterized by delusions and hallucinations); Resident 43 who received Risperdone (antipsychotic medication); and Resident 36 who received Cymbalta (antidepressant medication) had no monitoring for side effects every shift as prescribed by the physician. This failure had the potential for the residents to receive unnecessary medication. Findings: 1. Review of Resident 128's face sheet indicated she had diagnoses dementia (memory problem) and hypertension (increase in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-06-07 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility had a 5.56% medication error rate when two medication errors out of 36 opportunities were observed during medication administration for one resident (Resident 60). This failure had the potential to compromise the resident's medical health. Findings: Review of Resident 60's physician orders dated 3/5/19, indicated Budesonide Suspension (used to control and prevent symptoms (wheezing and shortness of breath) caused by asthma) 0.5 milligrams/2milliliters (mg, ml units of measure). 2 ml inhale orally via nebulizer (a drug delivery device used to administer medication in the form of a mist inhaled into the lungs) two times a day for COPD (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, a lung disease in which airflow is obstructed and interferes with normal breathing). Resident 60's physician order dated 5/27/19 indicated Ipratopium-Albuterol Solution (help control the symptoms of lung diseases) 0.5-2.5(3)mg/3ml. 3 ml inhale orally via nebulizer every 4 hours as…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-06-07 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications and biologicals were appropriately stored and labeled during an inspection of two medication rooms and randomly selected medication carts when the following was found: 1. An emergency kit (e-kit, a box containing medication needed for immediate administration) containing injectable (put into the body using a needle and syringe) medications contained expired medications. 2. Medications that required refrigeration were stored inside the medication carts. 3. An injectable medication pen was opened and used with no date. 4. Liquid nutritional supplement was expired. These failures had the potential for the administration of expired or deteriorated medications or biologicals. Findings: 1. During an observation and concurrent interview with licensed vocational nurse B (LVN B) on 6/03/19 at 2:57 p.m., an e-kit containing injectable medications were examined in the medication room shared by Stations 3 and 4. On the outside of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-06-07 · tag F0813 — isolated
    Have a policy regarding use and storage of foods brought to residents by family and other visitors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store and ensure food under sanitary conditions for one of two sampled residents (Resident 94) when resident food brought by a family member (FM) was not properly stored, labeled and dated. This failure had the potential for food borne illness and food contamination. Findings: Review of Resident 94's clinical record indicated, he had diagnoses of morbid (unhealthy state) obesity due to excess calories and tracheostomy (a tube is inserted through a cut in the neck below the vocal cords) status. During an observation on 6/3/19 at 8:33 a.m., Resident 94 was lying on bed with three opened bags of biscuits on the bedside table and an opened bag of a loaf of bread. During an observation and interview with registered nurse J (RN J) on 6/4/19 at 4 p.m., she stated Resident 94 had opened bags of biscuits on the table and an opened bag of loaf bread. RN J stated the food was not properly stored, labeled and dated. During an interview with registered dietitian (RD) on 6/6/19 at 1:19 p.m., he stated the staff should have…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
ADELMAN, JASONIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 12/15/2008
JAVIER, JULITAIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 12/15/2008
JAVIER, PEPITOIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE DIRECTORNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 12/15/2008
RANDO, JAMESIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 12/15/2008
AQUINO, VICTORIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 04/16/2014
SANCHEZ, PELITAIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 12/15/2008

CMS files one row per role, so the 7 rows in the source record cover these 6 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$16.7M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-6.0%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses

A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$438per resident / day
operating cost
$13,318per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$413per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in California
$12,167/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$15,178/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,000/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 056376. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2024-10-18, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next