No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Inspire Behavioral Health

401 Ridge Vista Avenue, San Jose, CA 95127 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 116 certified beds · (408) 923-7232 Medicaid only — no Medicare

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citation — no harm found (F0609) — cited Jul 2024Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)1 immediate-jeopardy citation
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
  • lower-than-typical staff turnover (32% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
Worth asking about
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (40) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 4 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 4 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
2820 Alum Rock Ave · (408) 937-1894 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
3475 McKee Rd · (408) 272-9156 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
Lucky0.2 mi
3457 McKee Rd · (408) 937-6780 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Rough and ready · (408) 251-9849 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 4 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased3.3%10.2%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight2.2%4.0%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.8%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%1.2%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms1.6%7.3%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.4%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury1.1%1.6%3.3%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened2.2%9.8%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication36.1%13.7%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%98.2%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers0.0%4.3%4.7%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control2.9%10.2%21.2%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table92.4%12.0%17.1%check this — see note marked dagger below the table
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%93.2%79.4%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days0.462.251.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.071.571.80better

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

This value is several times the typical-state benchmark. It can be real, or it can be a coding artifact in what the facility submitted. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Staffing

0.53
RN hours/ resident / day
0.24
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.66
Aide hours/ resident / day
2.43
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.39
RN hoursweekends
31.6%
Total nursing turnover
42.1%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 116 beds and averages 115.8 residents a day — about 100% occupied, or roughly 0 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.43 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.53 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.66 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.21 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 2.52 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.58 to 0.39 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 32% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

9
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-11-05)
7
at the previous standard inspection (2024-07-11)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

40 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 27 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2025-11-05 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the safety for three of 12 residents (Resident 36, Resident 48, & Resident 98) who were at risk for elopement (the unauthorized, unsupervised departure of a patient/resident from a healthcare facility when their condition puts them at risk of injury or death) and eloped from the facility when:1. The facility failed to provide appropriate and sufficient supervision to Resident 48, when Resident 48 who is deemed gravely disabled (legal term to describe a condition where a person, due to a mental health or substance use disorder, is unable to provide for their basic needs like food, clothing, or shelter) eloped from the locked facility on 10/27/25, when Houskeeper A (HA) failed to follow protocol of ensuring the location of her keys at all times. It was later identified Resident 48 had used HA's keys to exit the locked facility. Resident 48 remained missing until the afternoon of 10/30/25. 2. The facility failed to accurately assess…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · G2025-11-05 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide the needed care and services that are resident centered for one of four residents (Resident 124) when:1.The facility did not accurately assess Resident 124's risk for falls prior to the two fall events Resident 124 had within one month on 2/16/25 and 3/7/25.2. The facility failed to implement an intervention that was included in Resident 124's care plan after her previous fall incident on 2/16/25.3.The facility did not follow their policy and procedure (P&P) when they failed to complete Resident 124's orthostatic blood pressure measurements (blood pressure measurements that are taken in three different positions: Lying down, sitting up, and standing up) as indicated in the SBAR (Situation, Background, Appearance, Recommendation Review and Notification, a way to communicate an event to the provider) completed on 3/7/25, and there was no documented evidence that orthostatic blood pressure measurements were completed in the Fall Risk assessment in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2025-03-21 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to implement effective safety measures in place to prevent elopement (the act of leaving without supervision and authorization) or absence without leave (AWOL, leaving the facility without permission) for one of four sampled residents ( Resident 1) who was at high-risk for elopement due to the fact that: 1. Staff had prior knowledge and awareness of Resident 1's desire and motivation to elope when Resident 1 had expressed a desire to go home prior to the visitation by a friend on 1/15/25, 2. Facility's staff did not follow the instructions of Resident 1's conservator restricting visitation by Resident 1's friends after the reported incident on 12/17/24 when Resident 1 was found to have a contraband (goods that have been imported -[goods or services brought into a country from abroad for sale] or exported illegally [goods and services that are produced in one country and sold to [NAME] in another without proper documents] and cigarette lighter…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-11-05 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — widespread
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the provision for safe and effective medication administration when:1. The facility allowed the preparation of medications 1 to 2 hours ahead of administration (or pre-pouring) for all residents at the same time without establishing safeguards and policy and procedures for staff to consistently carry out and to avoid mix-ups or medication errors during the preparation and administration.Consequently, four out of six nursing staff observed during medication administration did not label the medication cup for each resident during the preparation; and did not verify the pre-poured medications against the Medication Administration Record (MAR) for correctness, as a final check, at the time of administration. Also, during the medication administration observation, a nursing staff prepared and administered medications for two administration times (5 PM and 9 PM) for two of 12 sampled residents (Residents 75 and 87).2. There has been no…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-11-05 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards, and facility policy for food service safety in the kitchen and dining room, potentially affecting all the 116 residents when:1. The facility failed to label opened eggs in the walk in fridge with open and use by date. Failed to label 9 trays of prepared desserts with the date, or type of dessert in the walk in fridge.2. The facility failed to ensure kitchen staff performed hand hygiene after touching trash on the floor and after operating dirty equipment prior to returning to food preparation.3. The facility failed to ensure staff performed hand hygiene when assisting during meal times for seven residents (Resident 17, Resident 25, Resident 27, Resident 61, Resident 72, Resident 82, and Resident 92)These failures had the potential for residents to receive expired foods, wrong dessert items, and for cross contamination during meal time dining and kitchen food preparation from staff members not sanitizing their hands. 1. During…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-11-05 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — pattern
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure its medication error rate was below 5%. The facility had the medication error rate of 13.11% when 8 medication errors occurred out of 61 opportunities observed during the medication administration observation for 4 out of 12 sampled residents (Residents 39, 65, 75, and 87). Residents 75 and 87 received their medications 4 hours before scheduled time, which had the potential for adverse effects such as medications being given too close together from the previous dose or medications not given as intended (such as before bedtime to help sleep). Resident 39 received the incorrect priming (a required safety check to ensure the pen and needle work properly) of the insulin pen (a pre-filled pen containing insulin - medication to lower blood sugar). For Resident 65, the nursing staff did not prime her insulin pen before administering an insulin dose. The failure had the potential for adverse effects such as too low or high blood sugar.1.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-11-05 · tag F0924 — pattern
    Put firmly secured handrails on each side of hallways.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed equip the corridors with firmly secured handrails when the handrail in the hallway across from a resident room (Hallway B). This failure had the potential to adversely affect the health and safety of the residents in the area that use the handrail.During an observation on 10/27/25 at 12:19 PM, the handrail in Hallway B was observed to be loose. An indent in the dry wall was seen where the handrail is supposed to be attached to the wall. During a second observation on 10/29/25 at 12:19 PM, the handrail in Hallway B was observed still to be loose.During an interview with the maintenance person (MAIN) on 10/29/25 at 1:13 PM, the MAIN confirmed the handrail in Hallway B was not supposed to be loose. The MAIN also said he would repair the handrail right away.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-11-05 · tag F0628 — isolated
    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to timely notify a representative of the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman (an entity that serves as an impartial advocate for individuals or groups who have concerns or complaints about a particular organization) regarding discharges for one of one sampled resident (Resident 121). The facility faxed discharge notices on the day of discharge. This failure resulted in missed opportunities for an ombudsman to advocate if residents had concerns about their discharge.Findings:A Review of Resident 121's facesheet (A facesheet is a summary document containing a Resident's personal and demographic information, including contact details and medical history) indicated the resident was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including Schizoaffective disorders ( a mental health condition that's is marked by a mix of schizophrenia [a serious mental health condition that affects how people think , feel and behave] symptoms such as hallucination [an experience…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-11-05 · tag F0700 — isolated
    Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed assess for the need of a transfer pole for two out of two residents (Residents 9 & 81). These failures had the potential to put the residents at risk for entrapment and serious injury.Review of Resident 9's clinical record indicated Resident 9 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of schizoaffective disorder (a mental disorder that causes individuals to hear and see things that are not there), conversion disorder with seizures or convulsions (a mental disorder that causes medical symptoms in individuals with no explanation), neuroleptic induced Parkinsonism (a disorder of the musculoskeletal system caused by certain medications), and history of falling.Review of Resident 9's minimum data set (MDS, a required assessment done by skilled nursing facilities) Section GG (for functional abilities) indicated Resident 9 was marked for using a wheelchair as an assistive device, with level of function marked as 3- Partial/moderate…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-11-05 · tag F0808 — failed to follow doctor-ordered diets — isolated
    Ensure therapeutic diets are prescribed by the attending physician and may be delegated to a registered or licensed dietitian, to the extent allowed by State law.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure three residents (Resident 52, Resident 83, & Resident 95) received their therapeutic diet (specialized meal plan designed to treat or manage specific medical conditions) as ordered by the Registered Dietician and Physician when Resident 52, Resident 83, & Resident 95 did not receive their fortified item during lunch tray line.This failure had the potential for Resident 52, Resident 83, & Resident 95 to not receive their total calories as ordered in their diet, which could contribute to weight loss overtime.During a review of the facility Fortified Lunch Menu dated 10/29/25 indicated, fortified item (foods prepared or modified to meet the increased nutritional needs of residents in a skilled nursing facility, ensuring they get more calories and protein than they might from standard foods) was 1.2 ounce melted margarine.During a record review of Resident 52's meal tray ticket 10/29/25, at 12:03p.m ticket indicated, Fortified.During an observation of lunch tray line in the kitchen on 10/29/25, at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-11-05 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolated
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain equipment and environment in safe operating and sanitary condition when a toilet paper holder was left open in one resident bathroom (Resident Bathroom A). This failure had the potential to adversely affect the health and safety of the residents in Resident Bathroom A.During an observation on 10/27/25 at 8:59 AM, the toilet paper holder in Resident Bathroom A was seen open, with the toilet paper exposed. During a second observation on 10/29/25 at 10:58 AM, the toilet paper holder in Resident Bathroom A was still seen open as during the first observation.During an interview with the maintenance person (MAIN) on 10/29/25 at 1:13 PM, the MAIN confirmed the toilet paper holder in Resident Bathroom A was open and supposed to be closed.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-09-10 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure infection control practices were implemented when the maintenance director (MD) did not wash his hands when entering the kitchen. This failure had the potential to spread infection to residents and staff.Findings:During an observation on 9/9/25, at 1:05 p.m., the MD put on the hair net and entered the kitchen, but he did not wash his hands.The MD opened the three lids of the grease trap that was outside and in the back of the kitchen and closed them with his bare hands. Then the MD went back inside the kitchen, stood in front of the two-compartment sink, and grabbed on the front-and-top edge of the sink with his hands before going to the hand washing sink to wash his hands.During an interview with the MD on 9/9/25, at 1:30 p.m., he confirmed that he did not wash his hands when he entered the kitchen. The MD acknowledged that he should wash his hands when entering the kitchen.During an interview with the certified dietary manager (CDM) on 9/10/25, at 12:15 p.m., she stated the staff should put on the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-03 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to accurately code the elopement risk assessment (an assessment tool to evaluate whether an individual that need additional safety measures is at risk of leaving the facility unsupervised) for one of two residents (Resident 1). This failure had the potential to place the resident's health and safety at risk for not receiving appropriate care. Findings: Review of Resident 1's medical record on 1/3/25 indicated that on 12/26/24 at 11:55 a.m., Resident 1 had an incident of elopement /AWOL(absence without leave- the act of leaving a facility unsupervised and without prior authorization) from the facility. He was returned safely to facility with no injuries around 12:14 p.m. on same day. Review of Resident 1's medical record indicated he was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included schizoaffective disorder (a mental disorder that affect your thoughts, mood, and behavior), bipolar type (sometimes…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 27 citations
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-11 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to prevent two of three residents (1 and 2) from elopement when the staff and visitors did not look around to make sure Resident 1 and Resident 2 were not close by in the area when they opened the locked exit door to prevent the residents from exiting the locked door immediately when the door was opened. This failure placed the residents at risk for accident and injury. Findings: Review of Resident 1's admission Record indicated she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with schizoaffective disorder (a mental health condition that is marked by a mix of seeing things or hearing voices that others don't observe, believing things that are not real, persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest, and having great excitement and occasionally violent behavior) diagnosis. Review of Resident 1's Risk for Elopement, dated 12/20/23 and 1/7/24, indicated Resident 1 was high risk of elopement. Review of Resident 1's Change in Condition Evaluations, dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-09-24 · tag F0730 — widespread
    Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to conduct performance review at least once every 12 months for three of three certified nursing assistants (CNA A, CNA B, and CNA C). This failure resulted in unidentified the needed training for the CNAs to improve their skills in resident care every year. Findings: Review of CNA A's personnel file indicated she was hired on 8/14/20, and she did not have the performance review done in the year 2021, 2022, and 2023. During an interview with the director of staff development (DSD) on 9/23/24 at 4:10 p.m., she reviewed CNA A's personnell file and confirmed that CNA A did not have the performance review done in the year 2021, 2022, and 2023. Review of CNA B's and CNA C's personnel files indicated they were hired on 4/15/13 and 8/22/12, and they did not have the performance review done in the year 2021 and 2022. During an interview with the DSD on 9/24/24 at 11:45 a.m., she reviewed CNA B's and CNA C's personnel files and confirmed that CNA B and CNA C did not have the performance review done in the year 2021 and 2022. The DSD…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-11 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide supervision to prevent one out of three sampled residents (Resident 1) from leaving the facility without staff's knowledge and permission. This failure had a potential risk to compromise Resident 1's health and safety, as she was found walking toward the parking lot outside the facility on 8/11/24. Findings: A review of Resident 1's medical record indicated she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including unspecified schizophrenia (a serious mental illness that affects how a person thinks, feels, and behaves). A review of Resident 1's minimum data set (MDS, an assessment tool) dated 6/25/24 indicated his brief interview for mental status (BIMS, cognition level) score was 12 (8 to 12 points suggests moderate cognitive impairment). During an interview with the Program Consultant (PC) on 9/6/24 at 9:13 a.m., the PC stated that she looked through her glass window in her office around 10:46 a.m. and found Resident 1 was walking on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-12 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement their policies and procedures to report a sexual allegation within the required two hours timeframe to the local law enforcement, the California Department of Public Health (CDPH) and Ombudsman as required for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1); and prevent the recurrence of sexual allegation for of three sampled residents (Resident 2) when: 1. Resident 1 claimed Resident 2 held her breast on 6/18/24. 2. Resident 2 had two sexual assault incidents involving two female residents in a period of one week. The failure to report the sexual allegation within two hours to reporting entities could compromise the welfare, health and safety of Resident 1 and other vulnerable residents; and the failure to prevent recurrence of sexual assaults could potentially put all vulnerable residents at risk. Findings: 1. Review of Resident 1's Situation Background Assessment Recommendation (SBAR, a verbal or written communication tool used…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-07-11 · tag F0623 — widespread
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, record review, and facility policy, the facility failed to notify the Ombudsman when a resident transferred or discharged from the facility for 3 (Residents #75, #78, and #118) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for hospitalization. Findings included: A facility policy titled, Transfer or Discharge, Emergency, revised in 09/2012, indicated, 1. Should it become necessary to make an emergency transfer or discharge to a hospital or other related institution, our facility will implement the following procedures: a. Notify the resident's Attending Physician; b. Notify the receiving facility that the transfer is being made; c. Prepare the resident for transfer; d. Prepare a transfer form to send with the resident; e. Notify the representative or other family member; f. Assist in obtaining transportation; and g. Others as appropriate or as necessary. 1. An admission Record revealed the facility admitted Resident #75 on 05/12/2020. According to the admission Record, the resident had a medical history that included a diagnosis of hypertension. Resident #75's Progress Notes,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-07-11 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to staff washed their hands before they applied gloves during the preparation of food. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents who received food from the kitchen. Findings included: A facility policy titled, Glove Use Policy, dated 2023, revealed 3. Wash hands when changing to a fresh pair. Gloves must never be used in place of hand washing. On 07/10/2024 at 10:32 AM, Specialist Dining Services Aide (SDSA) #16 answered the locked kitchen door, while he was in the middle of making peanut butter and jelly sandwiches. After SDSA #16 answered the door, he applied a new pair of gloves without washing his hands first, and then continued to make the peanut butter and jelly sandwiches. During an interview on 07/10/2024 at 1:00 PM, SDSA #16 confirmed that he did not wash his hands before he applied a new pair of gloves. SDSA #16 stated he understood handwashing was important to prevent contamination. During an interview on 07/10/2024 at 1:19 PM, the Dining Services Manager stated staff…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-07-11 · tag F0920 — pattern
    Provide at least one room set aside to use as a resident dining room and for activities, that is a good size, with good lighting, air flow and furniture.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility ensure 1 (Station 2 dining room) of 2 dining room provided sufficient space to accommodate all the residents who wished to eat their meals in the dining room. Findings included: An undated facility policy titled, Social Dining, specified, Our recovery-oriented program offers a structured environment designed to assist residents in managing daily living tasks. Social Dining, a key component of this program, is specifically tailored to meet residents' needs in developing and practicing a range of skills. These include, but are not limited to, fairness, patience, courtesy, mood regulation, acceptance of reality, and learning the benefits of orderly conduct like queuing. Residents are given the opportunity to request preferred meals, wait patiently for their meal to be served, appreciate the communal aspect of dining, await their turn for seconds, and manage their emotions when their preferences cannot be met. During an observation of dining on 07/09/2024 at 12:32 PM, it was noted that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-11 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment was accurate for 1 (Resident #33) of 1 sampled resident reviewed for respiratory care. Findings included: An admission Record revealed the facility admitted Resident #33 on 07/21/2017. According to the admission Record, the resident had a medical history that included a diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Resident #33's care plan, initiated on 01/07/2022, revealed the resident was on oxygen therapy due to decreased oxygen, diagnoses of COPD, acute respiratory failure and a history of COVID-19 and pneumonia. A quarterly MDS, with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 06/27/2024, revealed Resident #33 has a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 11, which indicated the resident had moderate cognitive impairment. The MDS revealed the resident did not receive oxygen therapy. Resident #33's Order Summary Report with active orders as of 07/02/2024, revealed an order dated 11/29/2018, that directed the staff to monitor the resident's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-11 · tag F0699 — isolated
    Provide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide trauma-informed care to 1 (Resident #67) of 1 sampled resident reviewed for behavior-emotional, with a diagnosis of post-traumatic stress disorder. Findings included: An admission Record revealed the facility admitted Resident #67 on 06/01/2022. According to the admission Record, the resident had a medical history that included diagnoses of schizoaffective disorder, post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), mood disorder due to a known physiological condition, and depression. An annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 06/08/2024, revealed Resident #67 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14, which indicated the resident had intact cognition. Resident #67's care plan, initiated on 06/02/2022 revealed the resident was at risk for impaired cognitive status related to diagnoses of schizoaffective disorder, depression, mood disorder, and PTSD. Interventions initiated on 06/02/2022, directed staff to assist in activities of daily living (ADLs) as needed; assure resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-11 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure staff documented the administration of medications for 1 (Resident #35) of 5 residents observed for medication administration. Findings included: An undated facility policy titled, Specific Facility Medication Administration Procedure for [facility name], indicated Policy To administer medications in safe and effective manner. The policy specified, 3. Licensed Nurse who prepared the medication shall administer medication and document administration accordingly. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 04/17/2024, revealed the facility admitted Resident #35 on 10/12/2023. The MDS revealed the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14, which indicated the resident had intact cognition. Resident #35's Order Summary Report, with active orders as of 07/11/2024, revealed an order dated 01/06/2021, for benztropine mesylate tablet 0.5 milligram by mouth one time a day. During medication administration observation on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-11 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to soak soiled linen in a machine or sink as directed by their policy for 1 of 116 residents who resided in the facility. Findings included: An undated facility policy titled, Sorting, Washing, and Drying, revealed 8. Soak kitchen linen, towels, aprons, etc. [et cetera, and other similar things], in machine or sink using a degreasing presoak or detergent for at least an hour to remove grease and stains prior to washing. During a concurrent observation and interview on 07/10/2024 at 10:11 AM, outside of the laundry exit, there were two buckets filled with a liquid and clothing that was covered with a trash bag. The Laundry Aid stated the clothes in the bucket were from 07/09/2024 and they belonged to a resident who had heavily soiled their pants and the staff allowed the items to soak. During an interview on 07/10/2024 at 10:20 AM, the interim Laundry Manager stated the soiled items should have been washed. During an interview on 07/11/2024 at 11:21 AM, the Administrator stated he expected staff to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2021-11-05 · tag F0801 — widespread
    Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and facility document review, the facility failed to ensure the registered dietitian comprehensively carried out the functions and evaluated the effectiveness of Food and Nutrition Services as evidenced by: 1. Lapses in the delivery of services associated with: staff competency (cross-reference F802), following the menu (cross-reference F803), accommodating resident food preferences (cross-reference F806), food safety and sanitation (cross-reference F812), providing physician prescribed nutrition supplements (cross reference F692), 2. A lack of a full-time supervisor in the kitchen in August 2021 and September 2021, 3. Resident 85 's Nutritional Assessments were not completed. 4. Resident 3's and Resident 9's Nutritional Assessments were not completed. Failure to ensure dietetic services systems are accurately and effectively delivered may result in compromising the nutritional status of the residents by not assessing their nutritional needs, the potential transmission of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2021-11-05 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and facility document review, the facility failed to ensure food was stored, prepared, distributed, and served in accordance with professional standards for food safety when: 1. An ice machine was not kept in a sanitary condition, 2. The handwashing sink in the kitchen did not have hot water, 3. Multiple food service pans and equipment were stored wet, 4. One staff washed hands in the dishwashing sink on the dirty side of the dish machine, 5. Multiple expired items were stored in the kitchen refrigerators, 6. The meat slicer was stored dirty, and 7. The plates of hot food for the lunch meal were not covered during delivery. These failures had the potential to cause cross-contamination of food cross-contamination occurs when unclean surfaces or utensils spread germs to food and can potentially cause foodborne illness), the growth of microorganisms, and foodborne illness for the 113 residents eating at the facility. Findings: 1. During an observation and concurrent interview on 11/3/21 starting at 8:47 a.m. of the ice machine (Brand A) outside the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-11-05 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure accurate medication administration in accordance with standards of practice, when registered nurses prepared medications ahead of the scheduled time. This failure had the potential to resultin an increased risk of medication error. Findings: During concurrent observation and interview on 11/02/21, at 4:24 p.m., RN W prepared medications ahead of scheduled time for 9:00 p.m. She stated the eMAR would not allow her to click Yes (it was given) at this time because the medications for 9:00 p.m. were not yet due to give. It will only allow to click Yes (it was given) in the EMR one hour before and one hour after the scheduled administration times. During observation on 11/02/21 at 4:38 p.m., there were several medicine cups containing prepared meds ahead of time that did not have drug label found inside the drawer of medication cart. Each of the medicine cups had a piece of paper underneath with the residents' names written. The following were noted: During interview with RN W, on 11/02/21 at 5:00 p.m., RN W…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2021-11-05 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — pattern
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free of unnecessary drugs for four residents reviewed, when: 1. There was a duplicate of Resident 32's target behavior symptoms indicated for use of Haldol (antipsychotic), which was prescribed in two different routes of administration. 2. For Resident 266, there was no monitoring for adverse consequences for the use of Risperidone (antipsychotic) and Lorazepam (anti-anxiety). 3. There was no target behavior for Resident 267's use of Invega (antipsychotic). 4. For Resident 46, there was no specific target behavior indicated for use of chlorpromazine hydrochloride (antipsychotic medication) and thiothixene (antipsychotic medication). These posed the risk to negatively impact the residents due to the medication adverse reactions. Findings: 1. During review of Resident 32's physician order dated 11/2021, indicated Haloperidol 10 mg by mouth two times a day manifested by (m/b) responding to internal stimuli and non-factual statement…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2021-11-05 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, and facility document review, the facility failed to ensure the planned menu was followed for 16 out of 16 residents (Residents: 48, 75, 73, 39, 9, 76, 80, 57, 68, 11, 109, 35, 104, 36, 92, 81) on Regular Mechanical Soft texture diets. This failure had the potential to result in not meeting the nutritional needs thus further compromising the nutritional status of the residents. Findings: Review of the facility menu titled Fall Menus for Week 1 Tuesday 11/2/21 indicated for the Regular Mechanical Soft diet, the following items: Baked Chicken with [NAME] Sauce Grd (ground) #10 (3/8 cup), Boiled Red Potatoes Soft ½ c (cup), Seasoned Peas Soft ½ c. During an observation of the lunch meal service on 11/2/21 starting at 12:09 p.m., a green scoop was in the mechanical soft chicken. During a concurrent interview with FSW K at this time, she confirmed the green scoop was for serving the mechanical soft chicken and it was a #12 (1/3 cup) scoop. FSW K placed a #12 scoop of mechanical soft chicken, a #8 (1/2 cup) mashed potatoes, and 4 ounces (1/2 cup) of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2021-11-05 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the food preferences for five (Residents 48, 62, 81, 113, and 10) of 32 residents were followed, when these five residents did not receive their choice of foods they liked, or received food they did not like. This failure infringed on residents' choices and had the potential to adversely affect the psychosocial well-being of the residents. 1. During an observation on 11/01/2021 at 12:46 p.m. in Resident 48's room of her lunch tray, there was beef on her lunch tray which she did not eat. During an interview on 11/01/21 at 12:48 p.m. with certified nursing assistant H (CNA H), CNA H stated Resident 48 does not like beef. She received beef, and was not eating it. Resident 48's meal ticket hd beef as her dislike. During an interview on 11/01/21 at 12:56 p.m. with CNA H, CNA H stated she was not sure why the resident received beef, since it's on the card as dislike. I need to check when I bring in the tray. During an interview and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-11-05 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain effective infection control practices, when: 1. For six of 12 residents observed during the medication pass administration, the facility staff did not sanitize the surface area in the nursing station with disinfecting wipes, after each resident had received their medication. 2. For Resident 72, the licensed nurse did not replace the two medications that dropped on to the unsanitized counter surface area. Resident 72 took it by his mouth after he picked it up with his bare hand. 3. The meal cart was left open in the hallway while delivering meals, and 4. Two CNA T and CNA U did not perform hand hygiene between each meal tray delivered to residents' rooms. These failures had the potential to place residents at increased risk of healthcare-associated infection. Findings: 1. During medication pass observation on 11/02/21 at 9:15 a.m., the facility staff did not sanitize the counter surface area in nursing station Y, with disinfecting wipes, every after each resident had received their medication. During…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-11-05 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to offer to one of 23 sampled residents (Resident 83) a bedside table to use during meals. This failure prevented Resident 83 from eating her meals safely and properly. Findings: Review of Resident 83's clinical record indicated the resident was admitted on [DATE] and had diagnosis of Paranoid Schizophrenia (mental illness characterized by delusions and hallucinations), acute cholecystitis (swelling of the gallbladder), major depressive disorder (mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest), and anxiety disorder (a mental health disorder characterized by feelings of worry, anxiety, or fear that are strong enough to interfere with one's daily activities). Review of Resident 83's current Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool) indicated Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 9, which indicates moderate cognitive impairment. During an observation and interview on 11/1/2021, at 12:20 p.m., the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-11-05 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain a clean, safe, and sanitary homelike environment for two of 23 sampled residents (Resident 81 and, Resident 113) when the facility shower rooms drainage was not working properly and clogged. This failure had the potential to place the residents in an unsafe and unsanitary environment. Findings: 1. Review of Resident 81's clinical record indicated she had diagnoses of diabetes (increase blood sugar), heart disease, and hypertension (increased blood pressure). Review of Resident 81's minimum data set (MDS, an assessment tool) dated 9/9/21, indicated Resident 81 was cognitively intact, required staff to set-up for bathing, eating, and personal hygiene. During a resident council meeting on 11/2/21 at 2:03 p.m., Resident 81 stated the shower room drainage was clogged. During an interview with Resident 81 on 11/3/21 at 12:54 p.m., she stated the shower room drainage was clogged and she would slip on the floor. 2. Review of Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-11-05 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to keep corrosive cleaning supplies out of the reach of two of ten ambulatory residents (Residents 47 and 72). This failure had the potential to place residents at a safety risk. Findings: During observation on 11/03/21 at 03:39 p.m. , there was a solution container labeled bleach (corrosive cleaning supply to whiten by chemical) found in the sink of a residents' room. During interview with registered nurse (RN I) on 11/03/21 at 03:45 .p.m., RN I stated it poses a safety risk because residents might ingest it accidentally. The housekeeper should not have left it there. The facility's undated policy and procedure titled Safety First, did not indicate measures on the safekeeping of corrosive cleaning supplies out of the reach of ambulatory residents.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-11-05 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow the policy and procedure for incontinence management for two sampled residents (Resident 85 and Resident 17) when the residents bowel and bladder (B&B, to manage urinary incontinence, restore, improve, and maintain the normal bladder function) program was not implemented. This deficient practice had the potential to cause a decline in B&B control. Findings: 1. Review of Resident 85's clinical record indicated she had diagnoses of diabetes (increase blood sugar), hypertension (increased blood pressure), and hypothyroidism (a condition in which the thyroid gland does not produce enough of certain crucial hormones). Review of Resident 85's bowel and bladder evaluation dated 1/8/21, indicated Resident 85 was incontinent of both bowel and bladder. Resident 85's bowel and bladder program was to provide a retraining treatment. Review of Resident 85's documentation survey report dated 1/2021, indicated the B&B was documented every shift. There was no documented evidence Resident 85 had a B&B retraining program. During an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-11-05 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and facility document review, the facility failed to provide physician ordered nutrition supplements (products that are used to complement a resident's dietary needs, a high calorie drink in this case) for one resident (Resident 62) with a history of weight loss. This failure had the potential to cause further weight loss and decline in health status. Findings: Review of the facility document titled Order Summary Report for Resident 62, dated 11/5/21, indicated under Dietary supplements 2 Cal (calorie) Supplement 60 cc (cubic centimeter, a measurement of volume) two times a day for supplement with an order date and start date of 4/1/2020 and House supplement two times a day 4 oz (ounce) house supplement with an order date and start date of 6/14/21. During an interview with certified nursing assistant V (CNA V) on 11/4/21 starting at 11:00 a.m., CNA V stated the kitchen did not bring the nutrition supplement for Resident 62 that morning which usually comes at 9-9:30 a.m. CNA V stated Resident 62 usually gets one milkshake in the morning and did not know if she gets…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-11-05 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to evaluate level of pain numeric scale for one (Resident 5) of three residents reviewed for pain, prior to giving pain medication as needed. This failure had the potential for residents to not receive effective treatment for their pain. Findings: Review of Resident 5's clinical record revealed, Resident 5 was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses included schizoaffective disorder (mood depression), hypertension (high blood pressure) and epilepsy (seizure disorder). Review of Resident 5's MDS dated [DATE], indicated Resident 5 was cognitively intact and independent during activies of dsaily living (ADL). During observation with registered nurse J (RN J) during medication administration, on 11/02/21 at 08:55 am , RN J administered two tablets of Ibuprofen 200 mg each with Resident 5. RN J did not ask for the pain score prior to giving the pain medication. During interview with RN J, at 11:58 a.m., RN J stated she forgot to ask. RN J further…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-11-05 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store all drugs and biologicals appropriately, when: 1. There was an expired emergency kit found in the medication room, which had the potential to result in ineffective drug regimen, when administered to residents. 2. A box of dulcolax (laxative to treat constipation) suppository (inserted into the rectum, vagina, or urethra) was found mixed with oral over-the-counter medications, These failure had the potential to result in an increased risk of medication errors. Findings: 1. During observation on [DATE] at 01:48 p.m. , in the medication room in Nursing Station Y, the emergency kit stored in an unlocked cabinet had an expiration date of 10/21. A box of lorazepam 0.5 mg tab contained eight tablets and a box of temazepam (Restoril) 7.5 mg/cap with four capsules had an expiration date of 10/21. During interview with licensing vocational nurse X (LVN X) on [DATE] at 1:50 pm, LVN X stated no one followed-up for replacement. During interview…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-11-05 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — isolated
    Provide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and facility document review, the facility failed to ensure two kitchen staff had appropriate competencies when: 1. One kitchen staff did not follow recipes for the puree diet (a diet for people who have difficulty chewing and/or swallowing), and did not know the correct cool down procedure for cooling hot Time/Temperature Control for Safety Food (TCS foods that require time/temperature control for safety to limit pathogen growth or toxin formation), and 2. One kitchen staff did not properly sanitize dishware. These failures had the potential to place the 113 residents who received food prepared in the kitchen at risk for food borne illness or to not meet their nutritional needs. Findings: 1a. During a concurrent observation and interview in the kitchen on 11/2/21 at 11:17 a.m., Food Service Worker K (FSW K) was preparing the puree baked chicken, seasoned peas, and cornbread for the one resident on a puree diet. She placed, and confirmed, one #8 scoop (1/2 cup) of chopped chicken and added two #8 (1/2 cup) scoops of hot water in the food processor…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-11-05 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — isolated
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure appropriate use of antibiotic (medication for the infection) were properly documented based on the facility policy for one sampled resident and two non-sampled residents (Resident 10, 25 and 87). This failure had the potential for the residents to take unnecessary antibiotics which could lead to resistance to the antibiotics. Findings: Review of the facility Infection Prevention and Control Surveillance Log, indicated Resident 10, Resident 25, and Resident 87 had received antibiotics for the months of June 2021 and July 2021. There was no documented evidence related how the residents meet the criteria for infection, culture and sensitivity of antibiotics. During an interview with the infection preventionist (IP) on 11/5/21 at 10:16 a.m., she confirmed Resident 10, Resident 25, and Resident 87 had received antibiotics. IP also stated she needed to develop a process regarding the appropriate use of antibiotics to reduce the adverse effect of the medications. Review of the facility's undated policy, Antibiotic…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
Ownership Data Not Available

The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

What families pay in CA

Paying with Medicaid

CMS lists this home as Medicaid-certified only — it can accept Medicaid for long-term care, but it is not Medicare-certified, so Medicare will not pay for a short rehabilitation (“skilled nursing”) stay here. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in California
$12,167/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$15,178/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,000/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 05A277. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-11-05, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next