Lincoln Glen Skilled Nursing

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.18 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 19% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 36% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 59 beds and averages 52.8 residents a day — about 89% occupied, or roughly 6 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.76 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.07 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.80 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.44 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.88 on weekdays — 9% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.26 to 0.61 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 23% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

27 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 17 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-03-24 · tag F0700 — widespread
  Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the proper use of side or bed rails (adjustable rigid bars attached to the side of a bed) for 22 (Residents 35, 9, 24, 15, 14, 8, 19, 16, 10, 21, 7, 13, 29, 30, 33, 39, 253, 38, 37, 1, 50 and 11) of 22 residents who used side or bed rails when: 1. Twenty-two (22) of 22 residents who used side or bed rails were without care plans, 2. The risks of entrapment prior to the installation of side or bed rails were not assessed for 22 of 22 residents who used bed rails, and 3. The bed rail assessments were not updated in a timely manner for 18 of 22 residents (Residents 35, 9, 24, 15, 8, 19, 16, 10, 21, 7, 13, 29, 30, 33, 39, 38, 37 and 11). These failures had the potential to place the residents at risk for entrapment (an event in which a resident is caught, trapped, or entangled in the space in or about the bed rail) and injury. Findings: 1a. During the observation of Resident 35, on 3/17/25 at 2:18 p.m., Resident 35 was in bed, confused…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-03-24 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to keep the exterior of the kitchen's ice machine free of dust. This failure placed all 51 residents at risk of food contamination (unintended presence of potentially harmful substances such as microorganisms, chemicals, or physical objects in food.) Findings: During an observation and interview with the Food Service Manager (FSM) on 3/20/25 at 2:00 p.m. in the facility's kitchen, the exterior side panel of the ice machine was covered in dust. Clean plates were also placed next to the dusty side of the ice machine. The FSM confirmed the observation and stated that the area was dusty. During a concurrent interview and review of the facility's Cleaning Assignments Checklist, provided by the FSM, indicated that staff were responsible for sanitizing the ice scoop, scoop holder, and exterior of the ice machine. The FSM stated that kitchen staff clean the exterior of the ice machine every evening shift. During an interview on 3/20/25, at 2:10 p.m., the Director of Support Services (DSS), who was also present in the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-24 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were stored appropriately when: 1. Opened medications without open date were found in Station 1 and Station 2 medication carts, and one expired medication was found in Station 1 medication cart. This had the potential for residents to be given expired or past open-period medications. 2. A medication cart with medications was left unlocked. This had the potential for access to medications by unauthorized persons such as unauthorized staff, residents, and visitors. Findings: 1a. During an observation on Station 1 medication cart with registered nurse D (RN D) on [DATE], at 12:43 p.m., an opened bottle of docusate sodium (stool softener) 250 milligrams (mg, a metric unit of mass) and an opened bottle of guaifenesin (cough and cold medication) 100 mg/5 milliliters (ml, a metric unit of volume) did not have and open date for each bottle; and one container of hyoscyamine sulfate (treats the symptoms of condition that affects…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-24 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff followed proper infection control procedures when: 1. Certified Nursing Assistant F (CNA F), Certified Nursing Assistant G (CNA G), and Activities Leader H (AL H) delivered meal trays to Resident 6, Resident 21, and Resident 24 without sanitizing their hands; 2. Licensed Vocational Nurse E (LVN E) used paper towel to wipe the first drop of blood on Resident 4's finger; 3. Employee food was placed on Resident 27's overbed table; 4. Resident 40's filter of oxygen concentration was dusty, and her humidifier bottle was not changed within 5 days; 5. Home Health Aids I (HHA I) walked out of Resident 46's room without sanitizing her hands; and, 6. For Resident 7, LVN E did not perform proper hand hygiene practices during wound care. These failures had the potential to increase the risk of spreading infections in the facility. Findings: 1. During a lunch observation on 3/17/25, at 12:08 p.m., certified nursing assistant F (CNA F) pushed the meal cart then brought the lunch tray to Resident 6 without…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-24 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to treat the residents with dignity for one of two residents, (Resident 1), when Resident 1's urine drainage bag was not covered. This failure had the potential to cause embarrassment and feeling low self-esteem for the resident. Findings: Review of Resident 1's admission Record indicated she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with retention of urine diagnosis. Review of Resident 1's physician order, dated 11/26/24, indicated Resident 1 had a Foley catheter (a device that drains urine from the urinary bladder into a drainage bag outside of the body when the person cannot urinate on his/her own). During an observation and interview with licensed vocational nurse A (LVN A) on 3/17/25, at 9:28 a.m., Resident 1 was lying in her bed. Her urine drainage bag was hung on the bed side and was not covered. LVN A stated Resident 1's urine drainage bag should be placed in a cover bag. Review of the facility's policy, Dignity, dated 2/2021, indicated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-24 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to accurately code the Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool and care screening tool) for pressure ulcers for one of 14 sampled residents (Resident 7). This failure could lead to an inaccurate resident assessment. Findings: A review of Resident 7's Treatment Administration Record (TAR) for January 2025 indicated the resident received daily treatment for a pressure injury on the sacrum. A review of the TAR for October 2024 also indicated daily treament for pressure injury on the sacrum. A review of Resident 7's Section M of the MDS dated [DATE] and 1/31/25 inidicated that Resident 7 was not coded as having a pressure injury on the sacrum (large, triangular bone located between the hip bones.) During an interview and record review on 3/20/25 at 10:38 a.m., the Minimum Data Set Coordinator (MDSC) reviewed Resident 7's TAR and other clinical records related to the pressure injury. The MDSC confirmed that Resident 7 received treatment during…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-24 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the resident care plans were reviewed and updated for effectiveness in four of fourteen sampled residents, (Residents 6, 35, 43 and 44), when the activity care plans of these four residents were not reviewed and updated quarterly. These failures had the potential to result in the residents not receiving the interventions necessary to maintain their highest level of well-being. Findings: 1. During the observation of Resident 6 on 3/17/25 at 1:55 p.m., Resident 6 was laying in her bed, alert, calm, comfortable and verbally responsive. Review of the admission record (document created when a resident is admitted to a healthcare facility, containing the vital information about the resident) of Resident 6 indicated, Resident 6 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with primary diagnosis of unspecified chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD, group of lung diseases that block airflow and make it difficult to breathe). Review of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-24 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure, the residents received the necessary care and services for one of 13 residents, (Resident 40), when there were no physician order and no care plan for Resident 40's skin discoloration on her left and right forearm. This failure had the potential to affect the resident's care and could jeopardize her health and well-being. Findings: Review of Resident 40's admission Record indicated she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. During observations on 3/17/25 at 10:30 a.m. and on 3/21/25 at 11:09 a.m., Resident 40 had skin discoloration on her left and right forearm, but there was no physician order and no care plan for the discolorations. During an interview with the director of nursing (DON) on 3/21/25, at 11:27 a.m., she reviewed Resident 40's clinical record and confirmed that Resident 40 did not have physician order and care plan for the discoloration on her left and right forearm. The DON stated, a physician order and care plan…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-24 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure provision of care and services related to pressure ulcers were consistent with professional standards of practice for one of fourteen sampled residents (Residents 35), when there were no wound measurements for Resident 35's three wound assessments. These failures had the potential for the residents with pressure ulcers, not being properly monitored and treated which could delay the healing or worsen the wound. Findings: During the observation of Resident 35 on 3/17/25 at 2:18 p.m., Resident 35 was laying in her bed, awake, confused, and unable to answer questions. Review of Resident 35's admission record (document created when a resident is admitted to a healthcare facility, containing the vital information about the resident), indicated, Resident 35 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Parkinson's disease (disorder of the central nervous system that affects movement, often including tremors) with…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-24 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the effective use of medications for one of 13 residents (1) when Resident 1 received ferrous sulfate (iron, for prevention/treatment of iron deficiency) and Calcium+D3 (a medication used to prevent or treat low blood calcium levels) at the same time. This failure had the potential for the resident to not receive the amount of prescribed iron supplement. Findings: Review of Resident 1's admission Record indicated she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with anemia (a condition that develops when the blood produces a lower-than-normal amount of healthy red blood cells) diagnosis. Review of Resident 1's clinical record indicated, she had physician orders for ferrous sulfate 325 milligrams (mg, a metric unit of mass) every other day for anemia at 9 a.m., started on 11/28/24, and for Calcium+D3 600-20 mg-microgram (ug, a metric unit of mass) two times a day, at 9 a.m. and 6 p.m., started on 2/19/25. Thus, since 2/19/25, ferrous sulfate and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 24 rows in the source record cover these 11 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CA