Bancroft Healthcare Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.08 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 4% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 19% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 39 beds and averages 36.4 residents a day — about 93% occupied, or roughly 3 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.56 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.14 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.52 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.52 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.57 on weekdays — 1% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.12 to 0.17 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 34% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

30 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 19 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2025-08-08 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, licensed nursing staff did not provide care according to professional standards for 1 of 3 sampled residents (Resident 1). Resident 1 had been prescribed oxycodone (narcotic) since 2024 and was in hospice (end-of-life care for a terminal illness.) When Resident 1 could no longer swallow her pills, facility staff did not have a plan in place to address withdrawal symptoms from the oxycodone.This resulted in Resident 1 experiencing unnecessary pain, agitation and distress.During a review of Resident 1's clinical document titled admission Record, the admission record indicated, the facility admitted Resident 1 on 12/14/2023 with multiple medical diagnoses including multiple fractures, cerebral infarction (stroke) and chronic pain syndrome. During a review of Resident 1's clinical document titled Physician's Order dated 4/7/2025, the document indicated, Resident 1 was admitted into hospice care with terminal diagnosis of Dysphagia (inability to swallow) due to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-10-10 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the residents' medical records were updated to show documentation that advanced directives (written statement of a person's wishes regarding the medical treatment made to ensure those wishes are carried out should the person be unable to communicate them to a doctor), were discussed with the residents and/or responsible parties for four out of 14 sampled residents (Residents 17, 2, 22 and 24). This failure had the potential for the facility to provide treatment and services against the residents' wishes. Findings: During a review of Resident 17's admission Record, dated 10/8/24, the record indicated Resident 17 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included aphasia following cerebral infarction (aphasia is a disorder that affects how a person communicates, cerebral infarction is a serious condition that occurs when blood flow to the brain is blocked, causing brain tissue to die). During a review of Resident 17's Minimum Data Set (MDS,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-10 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure two of two sampled residents' (Resident 4 and 21) rooms had comfortable and safe temperature levels. This failure had the potential to cause overheating in residents and discomfort during severe hot weather. Findings: During a review of Resident 4's Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS - Resident assessment and care guide tool), dated 5/24/24, the MDS indicated Resident 4's Basic Interview of Mental status (BIMS, a scoring system used to determine the resident's cognitive status regarding attention, orientation, and ability to register and recall information. A BIMS score of thirteen to fifteen is an indication of intact cognitive status.) score was 14 and indicated intact mental status. The MDS indicated Resident 4 was able to recall the correct year and month. The MDS indicated Resident 4 had clear speech, able to express her ideas and wants, and understood what others said to her. Resident 4's diagnoses included stroke. During a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-10-10 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — pattern
  Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to use the communication binder (a communication visual tool that is used to help residents communicate their needs) for three of three sampled non-English speaking or aphasic (a language disorder that affects how you communicate) residents (Resident 25, Resident 24, and 17) when: 1. Resident 25 and 24's communication binders were not used, and 2. Resident 17 did not have a communication binder. This failure had the potential for Residents 25, 24 and 17 not to understand and carry out activities of daily living (ADL). Findings: 1. During a concurrent observation and interview on 10/9/24, at 10:00 a.m., with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 1, in Resident 25's room, LVN 1 could not understand Resident 25 as Resident 25 spoke only in her native language. LVN 1 stated she could only communicate with Resident 25 through gestures and pointing. LVN 1 stated she did not know what language Resident 25 spoke. During a review of Resident 25's admission…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-10-10 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set (MDS-Resident Assessment and Care Screening tool used to guide care), accurately reflect the assessment status for two (Resident 4 and 12) of fourteen sampled residents when 1. Resident 4's MDS section G did not reflect limitation in range of motion to upper and lower extremities (hip, knee, ankle, foot), and 2. Resident 12's MDS section K did not reflect a significant weight loss. These failure had the potential for residents to not receive appropriate care and services. Findings: 1. During a review Resident 4's admission Record (AR), AR indicated Resident 4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included osteoarthritis of knee (the wearing down of the protective tissue at the ends of bones cartilage occurs gradually and worsens over time). During a review of Resident 4's care plan review date 9/11/24, the care plan indicated Resident 4 had limited physical mobility to upper and lower…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-10 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
  Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one (Resident 32) sampled resident on tube feeding (Tube feeding refers to the delivery of nutrients through a feeding tube directly into the stomach, duodenum, or jejunum. It is also referred to as an enteral feeding.) maintained acceptable nutritional status and body weight range when Resident 32's unplanned weight loss was not reevaluated with appropriate interventions by the Registered Dietician (RD), and the facility did not notify the physician and responsible party of Resident's 32 unplanned weight loss. This failure had the potential to result in Resident 32's dehydration and unplanned weight loss. Findings: During a review of Resident 32's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS - Resident assessment and care guide tool), dated 7/29/24, the MDS indicated Resident 32's Basic Interview of Mental status (BIMS, a scoring system used to determine the resident's cognitive status regarding attention, orientation, and ability to register and recall information. A BIMS score of thirteen to fifteen is an…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-10-10 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
  Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one (Resident 18) sampled resident was free from unnecessary drugs when Resident 18 with diagnosis of Alzheimer Dementia was administered Seroquel (Antipsychotic medication are drugs used to treat schizophrenia and bipolar serious mental health conditions, capable of affecting the mind, emotions, and behavior) medication without adequate clinical indication for continued usage. This failure had the potential for Resident 18 to receive unnecessary medications and had the potential for the Resident 18 to suffer adverse medication side effects. Findings: During a review of Resident 18's Significant change in status-Minimum Data Set (MDS, Resident Assessment and care guide tool), dated 5/17/24, indicated Resident 18's Basic Interview of Mental status (BIMS, a scoring system used to determine the resident's cognitive status regarding attention, orientation, and ability to register and recall information. A BIMS score of thirteen to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-10-10 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe medication storage and labeling when: 1. One box of expired blood glucose test strips (small, disposable plastic strips that measure blood sugar levels) for Resident 137 was stored in the medication room, 2. A bottle of liquid Lorazepam (medication used to treat anxiety) which belonged to a deceased resident was stored in the refrigerator in the medication room, and 3. A bottle of expired Senna (laxative) tablets was stored in the medication cart 2. These failed practices could contribute to unsafe medication use in the facility. Findings: 1. During a concurrent observation and interview on 10/7/24 at 10:20 a.m. with the Director of Nursing (DON), one box of expired blood glucose test strips with an expiration date of 2/25/21 for Resident 137 was found stored in the medication storage room. DON stated the expired blood glucose strips should have been disposed. Review of Resident 137's admission Record (AR) dated 10/10/24,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-10 · tag F0808 — failed to follow doctor-ordered diets — isolated
  Ensure therapeutic diets are prescribed by the attending physician and may be delegated to a registered or licensed dietitian, to the extent allowed by State law.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one (Resident 7) sampled resident received and consumed foods in the appropriate form and/or the appropriate nutritive content as prescribed by a physician when Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA 5) served Resident 7 a meal tray of pureed diet that belonged to Resident 13. This failure had the potential to cause residents to receive and consume foods that are not in the appropriate texture and nutrient content to support the resident's needs cause choking or food allergy. Findings: During a review of Resident 7's Significant change in status-Minimum Data Set (MDS - Resident assessment and care guide tool), dated 12/25/23, the MDS indicated Resident 7's was on a mechanically altered diet. Resident 7 needed partial to moderate assistance with eating. The MDS indicated Resident 7's diagnoses included Aphasia (a language disorder that affects a person's ability to communicate) and stroke. During an observation on 10/8/24 at 12:10 p.m. in the Dining Room (DR) there were six residents eating in the dining room.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2023-11-16 · tag F0572 — pattern
  Give residents a notice of rights, rules, services and charges.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to inform residents in a language they understood of their rights, all rules and regulations governing residents conduct and responsibilities during their stay at the facility for nine of nine sampled residents (Resident 5, 6, 8, 11, 21, 24, 25, 27 and 133), who were identified as Chinese speaking residents. A California ombudsman essentially helps senior victims of abuse or neglect to understand their rights within the legal system and reach a proper resolution}. This failure had the potential to cause residents emotional distress and despair. Findings: Review of the admission record indicated Resident 21 was Chinese and their primary language is Chinese. Resident 21 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. During a resident council meeting on 11/14/23 at 10:04 a.m., through a phone translator (PTL), Resident 21 stated he did not know who to talk to when he had grievances. Resident 21 stated he did not know about the Ombudsmen or their phone numbers. (A…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-16 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure storage of food under sanitary conditions when; - one carton of thickened Apple Juice from concentrate was opened with no use- by-date; - three containers of mayonnaise opened with no use-by-date; - five brownish, discolored juice cups ready for use; - one container of chopped garlic in oil opened with no use- by-date; - staffs' personal food items of tea, cooked eggs and cell phone were placed on the kitchen preparation table; - two bags of vegetables placed on the 2-compartment sink next to dishwashing area. These failures had the potential to result in food borne illness for residents who received food from the facility's kitchen. Findings: During the initial tour of the kitchen on 11/13/23 at 9:10 a.m., accompanied by the Dietary Manager (DM), the following were observed: one cartoon of thickened Apple Juice from concentrate was opened with no use- by-date; three containers of mayonnaise opened had no use-by-date; five brownish discolored juice cups ready for use, and one container of chopped garlic in oil opened…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

• Medicare payment denial — starting 2025-09-05 for 11 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 4 rows in the source record cover these 2 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 78% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.1M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 22% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CA