San Mateo Medical Center D/P SNF
222 West 39th Avenue, San Mateo, CA 94403 · Government - County · 345 certified beds · (650) 573-3678 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0602, F0607, F0609, F0610) — most recent Feb 2026
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- inspectors cited 3 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
- inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (57) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $104,000 in federal fines (most recent 2025-07-03)
- its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 4 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 3 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 3 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 2 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 5.9% | 10.2% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 3.1% | 4.0% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.2% | 0.8% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.6% | 1.2% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 17.3% | 7.3% | 6.5% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.4% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 1.8% | 1.6% | 3.3% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 6.0% | 9.8% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 11.0% | 13.7% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 93.3% | 98.2% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 3.6% | 4.3% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 11.3% | 10.2% | 21.2% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 9.7% | 12.0% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.6% | 1.5% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 83.8% | 93.2% | 79.4% | typical |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 22.2% | 23.0% | 22.6% | typical |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 12.5% | 11.2% | 12.0% | typical |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 2.25 | 2.25 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 2.28 | 1.57 | 1.80 | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
32.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 52 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 42.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 108 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.23 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 30% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 7% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 32.0%CMS range 22.8–46.0 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | worse than U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 9.8%CMS range 7.1–13.0 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 42.6% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 40.7% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 31.5% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 35.9% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 56.5% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 68.2% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 2.6% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 5.5%CMS range 3.5–10.1 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.86 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 345 beds and averages 303.3 residents a day — about 88% occupied, or roughly 42 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.94 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.62 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.40 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.64 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.06 on weekdays — 10% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.69 to 0.46 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
57 citations, most serious first. The 20 most serious are shown; the remaining 37 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2025-07-03 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe environment free from potentially serious accident hazards for all residents when its policies and procedures were not implemented for the following practices:1. The facility failed to ensure hot water in 6 of 8 residents' bathroom sinks were at a comfortable and safe temperature level.This deficient practice placed the residents (Residents 165, 187, and 259) at increased risk for scalding.An Immediate Jeopardy (IJ, a situation in which the provider's non-compliance with one or more requirements of participation has caused or is likely to cause serious injury, harm, impairment, or death to a resident) was declared at the [NAME] campus on 6/23/25 at 5:27 PM in the presence of the Administrator, Director of Nursing (DON), Regional Quality Management Consultants (RQMC), Assistant Chief Clinical Officer (ACCO), and [NAME] President of Operations (VPO) for the following deficient practice:Hot water temperatures were found to be…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2023-10-20 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to protect three of 3 sampled residents (Resident 2 and Resident 3, and Resident 8) from sexual abuse (non-consensual sexual contact of any type with a resident) by Resident 1 when: 1. Facility did not identify, report, and initiate an investigation of Resident 1 touching Resident 3's breast in the dining room in July 2023. Additionally, the facility did not develop and implement interventions to address Resident 1's behavior of touching female resident's sensitive area. This resulted in delayed identification and implementation of interventions to address Resident 1's sexually inappropriate behavior towards a female resident. 2. Facility did not report, investigate, develop, and implement interventions when Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 2 witnessed Resident 1 attempted to touch the private part of Resident 2 in August 2023. These failures resulted in continued access to Resident 2 and further sexual contact instigated by Resident 1 on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · J2023-10-20 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide process oversight and ensure effective implementation of its abuse policies and procedures to protect three of three sampled residents (Resident 2, Resident 3, and Resident 8) when: 1. Facility did not ensure three allegations of sexual abuse (non-consensual sexual contact of any type with a resident) were reported to the State Survey Agency (SSA) within the required timeframe of two (2) hours for Resident 2 and Resident 3. Additionally, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 2 and Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 1 who witnessed and reported the sexual abuse allegations to the nurse-in-charge were placed on suspension. 2. Facility did not conduct a thorough investigation of the three allegations of sexual abuse for Resident 3 in July 2023 and two incidents for Resident 2 in August 2023. In addition, the facility did not report the results of the investigation for all three allegations of sexual abuse to the SSA within five (5) working…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-03-21 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to prevent the development of a preventable pressure ulcer ( PU) for one of three sampled residents (Residents 111) when staff did not perform an accurate body check that reflected and identified Resident 111's skin condition. This deficient practice resulted in the development of Stage III PU for Resident 111. Definition/Stages for Pressure Ulcer/Pressure Injury (also called a bed sore, is an injury to skin and underlying tissue resulting from prolonged pressure on the skin. Stage I: Intact skin with a localized area of non-blanchable redness (non-blanchable: redness persists and does not fade or turn white after removal of fingertip pressure). Stage II: Partial-thickness loss of skin with exposed upper skin layer. The wound bed is pink. May also present as an intact or ruptured blister. Fat tissue and deeper tissues (muscle, tendons, bone) are not visible. Stage III: Full-thickness tissue loss. Subcutaneous fat (fat under the skin) may be…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-03-21 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to prevent abuse to one of one sample resident (Resident 35) when another resident threw a bottle of deodorant at her resulting to an injury. The facility's failure resulted to Resident 35 to sustain a bump (swelling) over the right eye, and bruising (when a part of the body is injured and the blood gets trapped under the skin) to the right orbital areas (skin area around the eye). Findings: A review of the medical record face sheet (a document that provides resident information) indicated Resident 35 was admitted with diagnoses including dementia (decline in memory or other thinking skills) and stroke. A review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS, a standard assessment tool) dated 3/4/24, Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS, a brief memory test to help determine cognitive function [includes thinking, learning, and decision-making ability]) a score of 9 indicated Resident 35 had moderate cognitive impairment (decisions poor, supervision…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-02-15 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, facility staff failed to provide pressure injury services for one of four sample residents, Resident 1. For Resident 1, the facility failed to: 1. accurately assess Resident 1's pressure injuries (wounds caused by prolonged pressure to a body part, see definition below). 2. turn/reposition Resident 1 to prevent development and/or worsening of Resident 1's pressure injuries. These failures resulted in worsening of Resident 1's right hip pressure injury, development of a new right elbow pressure injury, and development of a new pressure injury to the right side of Resident 1's back. Definition for pressure injuries Stage I: Intact skin with a localized area of non-blanchable redness (non-blanchable: redness persist and does not fade or turn white after removal of fingertip pressure). Stage II: Partial-thickness loss of skin with exposed upper skin layer. The wound bed is pink. May also present as an intact or ruptured blister. Fat tissue and deeper tissues (muscle, tendons,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Hcited before2023-10-20 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — patternRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to conduct a thorough investigation for six of 7 sampled residents (Resident 1, Resident 2, Resident 3, Resident 5, Resident 6, and Resident 7) when: 1. Three allegations of sexual abuse (non-consensual sexual contact of any type with a resident) were not thoroughly investigated for Resident 1, Resident 2, and Resident 3. In addition, there was no documented evidence Resident 1's sexually inappropriate behavior towards Resident 2 and Resident 3 was addressed and measures were not implemented to prevent further sexual abuse towards Resident 2. Furthermore, the facility failed to report the results of all investigations of three allegations of sexual abuse to the administrator or designee and State Survey Agency (SSA) within 5 working days of the alleged incidents. 1a. Resident 1 was seen in the dining room touching Resident 3's breast in July 2023. 1b. Resident 1 attempted to touch inappropriately Resident 2's vagina in August 2023. 1c. On…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2023-10-20 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure three allegations of sexual abuse (non-consensual sexual contact of any type with a resident) were reported to the State Survey Agency (SSA) within the required timeframe of two (2) hours for three of 3 sampled residents (Resident 1, Resident 2, and Resident 3). 1. Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 2 witnessed Resident 1 touched Resident 3's breast in July 2023, alleged incident was not reported to SSA until 8/31/23. 2. A month later, CNA 2 had witnessed same resident (Resident 1) attempted to touch inappropriately another female resident's (Resident 2) vagina in August 2023, the alleged incident was not reported to SSA. 3. On 8/31/23 at 2:10 PM, CNA 2 witnessed Resident 1 in his room sitting on his wheelchair, with pants down while Resident 2 was touching Resident 1's penis, the alleged incident was reported at 6:10 PM (4 hours after the incident). These failures resulted in delayed identification and implementation of interventions to address…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2023-10-20 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide supervision and assistance to prevent a fall to Resident 4; and prevent injuries to three residents (Resident 5, Resident 6, and Resident 7) . This facility failure resulted in Resident 4 sustaining fractures (broken) to the 4th, 5th, 6th, 7th, and 8th right ribs (part of the bony framework that protect the chest) and Resident 5, Resident 6, and Resident 7, who were totally dependent on staff with their activities of daily living (ADL, self-care activities) were found with fractures of the femur (thigh bone) of unknown cause. Findings: A. A review of the face sheet indicated, Resident 4 was admitted with diagnoses including heart failure (when the muscles of the heart does not pump as strong as it should), and asthma (a lung disease). A review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS, a standard assessment tool) dated 3/20/23, Brief interview of mental status (BIMS, a brief memory test to help determine cognitive function) score of 2 indicated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2023-10-20 · tag F0776 — isolatedProvide timely, approved x-ray services, or have an agreement with an approved provider to obtain them.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a diagnostic procedure was provided for Resident 7 when a stat (medical term for rush) x-ray (a procedure to create images of the structure of the inside of the body, used to assess broken bones) was not completed as ordered by the physician. The failure resulted to the delay in identification and treatment of a femur (thigh bone) fracture (broken bone) for Resident 7. Findings: A review of the MDS dated [DATE], BIMS score of 4 indicated severe cognitive impairment. Under functional status Resident 7 was totally dependent and required one-person physical assistance with activities of daily living including mobility, transfer, eating and toileting. During an interview on 10/5/23, at 3:49 PM, Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 4 stated, Resident (Resident 7) barely speak, does not understand her condition and is totally dependent to staff with all her ADL needs. She needs physical help from a staff. She didn't fall when she had the fracture. We use…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-15 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify the responsible party of Resident 1 regarding changes in his clinical condition for one of four sample residents. This failure had the likelihood to prevent Resident 1's responsible party from being informed in a timely manner and from participating in care decisions related to Resident 1's change in clinical condition.Findings:Review of Resident 1's medical record titled Minimum Data Set (MDS= a standardized resident assessment tool), dated [DATE], indicated his BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status: a resident assessment tool for memory and reasoning) score was 6 out of 15. A score of 6 out of 15 indicated Resident 1 was severely impaired in his memory and reasoning skills.Review of Resident 1's medical record titled Face Sheet, printed on [DATE], indicated .Responsible Party Emergency contact #1 was .(Conservator 1).During an interview on [DATE] at 12:03 PM, Resident 1's Case Manager (CM) from a non-profit agency stated Resident 1 was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-28 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) when Phenobarbital (a prescription medication primarily used to control certain types of seizures), Olmesartan Medoxomil (a prescription medication used alone or with other drugs to treat high blood pressure), Metoprolol (a prescription medication primarily used to treat high blood pressure, prevent chest pain, and manage heart failure), and Hydroxyzine (a prescription medication primarily used to treat itching, anxiety, and allergic reactions) were not given according to the doctor's orders from February to April 2026. This failure was likely to result in Resident 1 being put at risk for not attaining or maintaining his highest practicable level of physical, mental, functional, and psychosocial well-being.Review of Resident 1's face sheet (front page of the chart that contains a summary of basic information about the resident) indicated, Resident 1 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including epilepsy (a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-27 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide adequate supervision to Resident 1 to prevent his elopement. This failure did not ensure Resident 1 was residing in a safe and supervised environment.Findings:Review of Resident 1's medical records titled MDS (Minimum Data Set assessment: a standardized resident assessment tool), dated 3/12/26, indicated his BIMS (Brief interview for Mental Status: an assessment tool for evaluating memory and reasoning abilities) score was 8 out of 15. A BIMS score of 8 indicated Resident 1 was moderately impaired in his memory and reasoning abilities.Review of Resident 1's medical records titled Care Plan, initiated on 5/1/26, indicated .The resident is an elopement risk/wanderer.(related to) impaired safety awareness as .(manifested by) attempt to leave the facility at 06:50am on 05/01/2026.Review of Resident 1's medical records titled IDT Note (interdisciplinary team note: a healthcare team from various disciplines such as nursing, social services, rehab, dietary etc.), dated 5/13/26, indicated .Resident noted with wandering…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-19 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to thoroughly investigate an allegation of neglect for Resident 1, one of three sample residents. Resident 1 alleged she was calling out in pain for 4 hours and her call light was pulled out of the wall and was non-functional. The facility failed to: Interview other residents and/or responsible parties around Resident 1's room regarding call light response.Check to see if Resident 1's call light automatically triggers when pulled out of the wall socket.Ensure the Maintenance Director was knowledgeable regarding how a call light should function when unplugged from the wall. This failure may subject residents to delayed response to their request for assistant and may delay staff response to an emergent situation. Findings: During an interview on 2/12/2026 at 1:25 PM, Resident 1 stated .I believe it was sometime in January. I was sick really sick. I was in pain.I kept ringing for the nurse .nobody came to the room. Someone closed the door to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-19 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, facility staff failed to recognize and report an allegation of neglect for Resident 1, one of three sample residents: when Resident alleged she was in pain for four hours and staff failed to response to her call for assistance. This failure had the potential for residents to be subject to abuse/neglect.Findings: During an interview on 2/12/2026 at 1:25 PM, Resident 1 stated .I believe it was sometime in January. I was sick really sick. I was in pain.I kept ringing for the nurse .nobody came to the room. Someone closed the door to the room .(later, I saw that my) call bell was not connected but.(initially) I didn't see that. I kept ringing and ringing .Nobody came so I was getting worried.I .(called the) hospital emergency room. (When the ambulance staff came to the facility and wheeled me out of my room, I saw) LVN 1 (License Vocational Nurse). sitting at the desk .I told her I was calling for hours for help. It was very scary. Review of Resident 1's medical record titled HOSPITAL DISCHARGE SUMMARY, dated 1/15/2026, indicated she was diagnosed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-07-03 · tag F0850 — failed to provide social-work services — widespreadHire a qualified full-time social worker in a facility with more than 120 beds.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to employ a qualified social worker on a full-time basis that met the qualifications specified in the regulation for 267 of 267 residents residing in the facility. This failure had the potential to result in residents not receiving sufficient and appropriate coordination of medically related social services to meet their needs.Review of the facility's license to operate, it was indicated the facility had a bed capacity of 281, with an effective date of 2/1/25 and expiring date of 1/31/26.Review of the facility's census at the start of the survey, it was indicated 267 residents were admitted , with an additional two (2) residents on bedhold status. During an offsite preparation interview on 6/18/25 at 1:59 PM, Ombudsman 1 stated the facility has no full time Social Worker (SW), just temporary, resulting to no or delay discharge planning.During an interview on 6/23/25 at 11:10 AM, Resident 40 stated having difficulty hearing and was waiting for hearing aid. When asked if Resident 40 had spoken with the SW regarding the concern,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-03 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe and sanitary conditions were met for food storage in the kitchen when:1. Diced peaches sat in a partially opened container in the refrigerator.2. A large cut of beef was inside a sealed clear plastic package with no expiration date in the freezer.3. Chocolate puddings were prepared in not fully dried small wet bowls.4. There were an expired container of liquid smoked sauce and brisk coffee roasters in a small bin found in the dry storage.5. Food distribution to the residents were delivered in a timely manner.These failures had the potential to result in putting residents at risk for foodborne illness (a disease caused by consuming contaminated food or drink).1. During a concurrent observation and interview on 6/30/25 at 2:24 PM with Dietary Manager (DM) 1 in the kitchen, diced peaches sat in a partially opened container in a refrigerator. DM 1 stated, I don't know when asked why the lid of the container was open. DM 1 stated,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-07-03 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — patternMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program when:1. A live cockroach was observed on the floor in the kitchen.2. A pest control company report dated 5/27/25 indicated, confirmed cockroach activity in the downstairs kitchen and documented that service was performed. The company provided recommendations, made some recommendations; however, the facility has not implemented them.3. A pest control company report dated 6/30/25 indicated that service was performed to help control an ongoing cockroach problem. This indicates that, despite previous treatment on 5/27/25 cockroaches were still present in the kitchen.4.An interview with the pest control technician revealed that there was a small to moderate number of German cockroaches found in the kitchen. The technician also advised checking the bait stations (small containers with insecticide used to attract and kill pests) regularly to track and manage the cockroach activity 5. The recommendations of the pest control company were not followed, including proper…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-07-03 · tag F0554 — isolatedAllow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to appropriately administer medications when one of 35 sampled residents (Resident 33) was self-administering prescribed oral medications without being appropriately assessed and approved for self-administration. This failure had the potential to place Resident 33 at risk for adverse health reactions like aspiration (choking, the accidental inhalation of food, liquid, or other material into the lungs) from improperly administered medication.Review of Resident 33's admission Record, indicated Resident 33 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including thrombosis (a blood clot, usually in the leg, which can cause swelling, pain, and redness), hypertension (high blood pressure) and dysphagia (difficulty swallowing).Review of Resident 33's Minimum Data Set (MDS -a federally mandated resident assessment tool), dated 5/21/25, indicated Resident 33 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS, MDS tool that measures resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-07-03 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolatedPrevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of six sampled residents (Resident 53) was free from unnecessary psychotropic medications (drugs that affect brain activities associated with mental processes and behavior) when the order for Lorazepam (medication used to treat anxiety) PRN (as needed) did not have a stop date.This deficient practice had the potential for Resident 53 to receive unnecessary psychotropic medication, be exposed to adverse health consequences from the medication, which could negatively impact the resident's mental, physical, and psychosocial well-being.Resident 53 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included cerebral infarction (also known as ischemic stroke, a medical condition where a part of the brain is damaged due to a lack of blood supply), hemiplegia (paralysis on one side of the body) and hemiparesis (condition characterized by weakness on one side of the body). Resident 53 was in hospice care.Review of Resident 53's Order Review History Report…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 37 citations
- Potential for harm · D2025-07-03 · tag F0636 — isolatedAssess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the annual Minimum Data Set (MDS, a federally mandated resident assessment tool) assessment was completed within the required period of 14 calendar days from the Assessment Reference Date (ARD, specific endpoint for the look-back periods in the MDS assessment process) for one of 35 sampled residents (Resident 165).Failure to complete a comprehensive resident assessment within the required timeframe could result in delayed identification of needs and significant issues that may affect the physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of Resident 165.Review of Resident 165's admission record indicated, was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident 165's annual MDS assessment with an ARD of 5/14/25, indicated, the assessment was signed as complete by the Registered Nurse (RN) Assessment Coordinator on 6/2/25, 19 days after the ARD. During a concurrent record review and interview on 7/3/25 at 4:07 PM, the MDS Coordinator (MDSC) reviewed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-07-03 · tag F0637 — isolatedAssess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete a Significant Change in Status Assessment (SCSA - a comprehensive assessment for a resident that must be completed when the IDT has determined that a resident meets the significant change guidelines for either major improvement or decline) for one of one sampled resident (Resident 53) when Resident 53 was admitted for hospice services.This failure could potentially delay the provision of appropriate treatment and services for Resident 53.Resident 53 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included cerebral infarction (also known as ischemic stroke, a medical condition where a part of the brain is damaged due to a lack of blood supply), hemiplegia (paralysis on one side of the body), and hemiparesis (condition characterized by weakness on one side of the body).During a concurrent interview and record review on 7/2/25 at 9:48 AM, with the MDS Coordinator (MDSC), Resident 53's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a resident assessment tool) with Assessment…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-03 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe medication administration for one of five residents (Resident 182) when Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 1 did not observe Resident 182 take his medication after leaving one prescription medication on the overbed table with the presence of an ambulatory roommate. The deficient practice resulted in a medication error for Resident 182; and may result in medication error and/or adverse health reactions when taken by the roommate. During medication pass observation on 7/2/25 at 9:20 AM, LVN 1 prepared fifteen (15) medications for Resident 182 including ClearLax Polyethylene Glycol 3350 Powder for Solution (used to treat occasional constipation). LVN 1 filled the measuring cap (purple bottle cap/cover) up to the rim which was above the 17 grams (g) mark (or line) and poured it in a cup with seven (7) ounces of water. During concurrent interview, LVN 1 was not aware of the 17 g mark/line inside the cap and stated that 17 g of the ClearLax was measured up to the rim of the cap. Review of Resident 182's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-07-03 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure care and services were provided to one of three sampled residents (Resident 14) who had an indwelling urinary catheter, by failing to consistently monitor for catheter kinks.This deficient practice had the potential for Resident 14 to develop urinary tract infection.Definition of Terms:The MedicineNet Medical Dictionary define indwelling Foley catheter as a flexible plastic tube (a catheter) inserted into the bladder that remains ( dwells) there to provide continuous urinary drainageUrinary Tract Infection (UTI) - an infection in any part of the urinary system -the kidneys, ureters, bladder, and urethraCatheter-Associated Urinary Tract Infection (CAUTI) - occurs when germs enter the urinary tract through a urinary catheter and cause infectionDuring an observation on 6/23/25 at 10:13 AM, Resident 14 was in bed, with a Foley catheter attached to a collecting bag. Light yellowish urine was noted on the tubing, not draining to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-03 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the consultant pharmacist's (CP) recommendation for the use of psychotropic medication was acted upon for one of six sampled residents (Resident 53).This failure had the potential for Resident 53 to receive unnecessary psychotropic medication, be exposed to adverse health consequences from the medication, which could negatively impact the resident's mental, physical, and psychosocial well-being.Resident 53 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included cerebral infarction (also known as ischemic stroke, a medical condition where a part of the brain is damaged due to a lack of blood supply), hemiplegia (paralysis on one side of the body) and hemiparesis (condition characterized by weakness on one side of the body). Resident 53 was in hospice care.Review of Resident 53's Order Review History Report for the month of June 2025 indicated, .Lorazepam (medication used to treat anxiety) Oral Tablet 0.5 mg (milligram) Give 1 tablet via G-tube…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-07-03 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide pneumococcal immunization (known as pneumococcal vaccination, refers to the process of administering vaccines to protect against pneumococcal disease, caused by the bacteria Streptococcus pneumoniae, also known as pneumococcus. These vaccines work by triggering the body's immune system to produce antibodies that fight off the bacteria, preventing or reducing the severity of these infections) for one of 5 sampled residents (Resident 650) when there was no evidence that the pneumococcal vaccine was given to Resident 650 even after a phone consent had been received from the responsible party on 2/26/25.This failure had the potential to result in putting Resident 650 at risk for acquiring (getting), transmitting (causing infections to pass on from one place or person to another), or experiencing complications from pneumococcal disease.Review of Resident 650's clinical record indicated, Resident 650 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-07-03 · tag F0887 — isolatedEducate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide COVID-19 immunization (also known as COVID-19 vaccine that helps our bodies develop immunity to the virus that causes COVID-19 without us having to get the illness. Different COVID-19 vaccines may work in our bodies differently, but all provide protection against the virus that causes COVID-19) for one of 5 sampled residents (Resident 650) when there was no evidence that the COVID-19 vaccine was given to Resident 650 even after a phone consent had been received from the responsible party on 2/26/25.This failure had the potential to result in putting Resident 650 at risk for acquiring (getting), transmitting (causing infections to pass on from one place or person to another), or experiencing complications from Coronavirus disease (COVID-19, an infectious disease caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus. Most people infected with the virus will experience mild to moderate respiratory illness and recover without requiring special treatment. However, some…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-03 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to conduct a thorough investigation into an allegation of sexual abuse between Resident 116 and Resident 223, 2 of 8 sample residents with allegations of abuse. Failure to thoroughly investigate an allegation of abuse did not ensure other residents were protected from abuse.Findings: Review of a facility's document titled Re: Five (5) Days Summary of Investigation, dated 05/30/2025, indicated .On 05/27/2025; .(Resident 223) told the receptionist on duty .that his male friend .(Resident 116) went to his room to visit him.However, this time on his visit, .(Resident 116) showed his private part(penis) and asked .(Resident 223) to touch it. On 06/26/2025 at 09:00 AM the Director of Nursing (DON) was asked to provide all documents regarding the facility's investigation into this allegation. Review of the documents requested, not titled and not dated, indicated the facility interviewed and assessed both Residents 116 and Resident 223. There was also a statement made by Activity Staff 1 (AS 1) who witnessed the alleged incident.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-03-21 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — widespreadEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to serve food and substitutes according to residents' preferences when: Residents with food preferences such as Jook and soups were not honored. This failure has the potential to deny the basic rights of 31 residents in a census of 264 residents to receive the services and care necessary to achieve or maintain their quality of life. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview with cook1 on 3/12/24 at 10:45 AM in the kitchen, observed him cooking pasta in a large skillet. He stated, today, we will serve meatballs, pasta, and spinach. During tray line observation, interview, and record review on 3/12/24 between 11:15 AM to 2:30 PM in the kitchen, observed some Residents' meal tickets indicated, likes Jook (porridge or Congee) and/or soup. During an interview with kitchen aide1, inquired, what is Jook? Kitchen aide1 stated, Jook is rice soup. There is no jook or soup today. During tray line observed several residents' meal tickets…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-03-21 · tag F0809 — failed to serve meals on a reasonable schedule — widespreadEnsure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide meals according to the facility's serving hour schedule when: During mealtimes observation, the meal cart was observed arriving late on the second floor for breakfast and lunch. This failure to follow the 14-hour rule for mealtimes especially at breakfast time have the potential to deny the residents patient centered care that will affect their psychosocial well-being and health outcome. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 3/11/24 at 10:15 AM, observed staff passing out trays into residents' room on the second floor. One HFEN Surveyor stated, they are just serving breakfast. During an interview with a certified nursing assistant (CNA5) on 3/11/24 at 10:26 AM on the second floor, she stated, yes, every day, the meal cart is always late. Breakfast just came in. During an interview with the Dietary Manager (DM) at 11 AM in the kitchen, the DM stated, the meal cart starts to go out at . Breakfast is served between 7 - 9AM, lunch at 11:30 -1:30 PM and dinner at 5-7 PM. During a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-03-21 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure food safety requirements in accordance with professional standards for food service when: 1. Serving plastic bowls, large plastic food containers and baking pans were not dried appropriately. 2. Plate warmers were not cleaned. 3. Serving trays were stacked and stored on a dusty cart outside of the kitchen door. 4. The kitchen staff still uses the hand sanitizer in the kitchen. 5. Bowls of cream of rice and bowls of oatmeal in the refrigerator were undated. 6. Two packs of grapes in the refrigerator were overripe, and some of them were mushy. The failure to store, serve, hand sanitize and distribute food in an unsafe and sanitary manner had the potential to put residents at risk for foodborne illness leading to severe illness and even death for 262 residents who consumed food by mouth. Findings: 1.During a concurrent observation, interview, and record review in the kitchen with the facility's Consultant, the Regional Registered Dietician (RD) on 3/11/24 at around 10:30 AM, observed on the rack by the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-03-21 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — patternHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure dignity and respect were maintained for one sampled (Resident 255) and two random residents (Residents 165 and 162) when: 1. Staff stood over Resident 255 and Resident 165 to assist with meals. 2. Facility failed to provide access to communication with staff in a language that is clear and understandable to the resident when a language translation service was not available for use by Resident 162. These deficient practices would not allow for social interaction and had the potential to lower Resident 255 and Resident 165's self-esteem and had the potential for Resident 162 to feel frustrated for being unable to communicate with staff and relaying her needs and concerns and had the potential for the other residents with limited proficiency in English to not have access to communication with persons inside and outside the facility. Findings: 1. Resident 255 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including dementia (the loss of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-21 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews and record reviews, facility did not ensure hospice services and interventions were addressed for three of five residents (Resident 155, Resident A, Resident B) when: 1. No coordination for plan of communication with facility and hospice agency regarding changes in Resident A's condition and death, and the staff were not trained on the protocol of who is the responsible provider for each specific function, to notify family,MD and Hospice. 2. The care plan did not include specific interventions of coordination of care between facility and hospice agency for Resident 155 and Resident B. These failure resulted in family not notified of change in condition and death of Resident A, and had the potential to result in not providing the needed treatment care and services for Resident 155 and Resident B. Findings: 1. During a review of Resident A's admission Record, dated [DATE], indicated, resident admitted on [DATE] original date. admitted to Palliative Care on [DATE] with the diagnosis…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-03-21 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — patternImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure three of three sampled residents (Residents 66, 118, and 255) were free from unnecessary psychotropic medications (drugs that affect brain activities associated with mental processes and behavior) when: 1. For Resident 66, consent was not obtained for the use of Mirtazapine (medication used to treat depression). 2. For Resident 118, consents were not obtained for the use of Aripiprazole (medication used to treat depression and Tourette syndrome [a nervous system disorder involving repetitive movements or unwanted sounds]), Haloperidol (medication used to control symptoms of Tourette syndrome), and Buspirone (medication used to treat anxiety [[a feeling of fear, dread, and uneasiness]). 3. For Resident 255, consents were not obtained for the use of Lorazepam (medication used to treat anxiety) and Trazodone (medication used to treat depression), and order for Lorazepam PRN (as needed) did not have a stop date. These deficient practices had the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-21 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were not expired and stored properly when: 1. One out of six sampled medication carts had two prescription eye drops that were found to be expired or not labeled after opening, 2. Multiple medications were found to be stored in the garage without temperature control. This failure has the potential to result in medications being administered to residents that are expired, ineffective, or potentially hazardous to the resident. Findings: 1. During a concurrent observation and interview on [DATE] at 3:23 PM with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 3 at the Unit 3 nurse's station, an opened Latanoprost Ophthalmic solution (eye drops used to lower pressure in the eyes) was observed inside the medication cart drawer. The ophthalmic solution had an open date of [DATE] and an expiration date of [DATE]. LVN 3 stated that the medication was expired and should have been discarded. During a concurrent observation and interview on [DATE]…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-21 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan (CP) for each resident that included measurable objectives and specific interventions for 2 of 38 sampled residents (Residents 111and 66) when: 1. No individualized person-centered CP was developed to address Resident 111's pressure ulcer (PU). 2. No individualized person-centered CP was developed for the use of Lorazepam (medication used to treat anxiety) for Resident 66. This failure had the potential for not meeting the residents' nursing needs and goals to attain their highest practicable well-being. Findings: 1. Resident 111 was readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including diabetes (abnormally high sugar level in the blood), congestive heart failure (a serious condition where the heart doesn't pump blood as efficiently as it should) and malnutrition. Review of Resident 111's Weekly Skin/Wound Assessment (WSWA) dated 3/13/24 indicated, Resident 111 had the following skin impairments: a. An initial…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-21 · tag F0732 — isolatedPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to post complete nurse staffing data daily from 3/11/24 to 3/15/24. Findings: During an observation on 3/11/24, on the initial tour, the nurse staffing posted for 3/11/14, indicated, name of facility, date, number of employees all shift, census. No total number and actual hours worked by each categories. During an observation on 3/12/24, the nurse staffing posted indicated, name of facility, date, number of employees all shifts, census. No actual number of hours worked by each categories. During an interview on 3/12/24 at 11AM, with Administrator, per Administrator there is a staffing person doing the posting, as a D/P SNF not obliged to comply with the DHPPD. (Direct Care Service Hours Per Patient Day). During an observation on 3/13/24, the nurse staffing posted indicated the same data. This posting remained till 3/15/24. During an interview with Administrator on 3/15/24 at 2:45 PM, showed him the posting dated 3/13/24. Administrator pulled posting and left. During an interview on 3/19/24 at 10:28 AM with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-21 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to keep an accurate reconciliation (recordkeeping) for a controlled substance (a chemical or medication regulated by the federal government due to high risk for abuse or dependence) when one out of six sampled narcotic records (a logbook used to keep track of controlled substances used/discarded and still available in supply) had an inaccurate count of medication. This failure has the potential to result in medication diversion (the transfer of a controlled substance from lawful to unlawful use). Findings: A review of a policy titled CONTROLLED MEDICATIONS, undated, indicated that When a controlled medication is administered, the licensed nurse administering the medication immediately enters the following information on the accountability record and the medication administration record (MAR): Date and time of administration, Amount administered, Signature of the nurse administering the dose, completed after the medication is actually administered. A review of a Resident 233's medication administration record,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-21 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the pharmacy consultant's recommendation for the use of psychotropic medication was acted upon for one of three sampled residents (Resident 255). This failure had the potential for Resident 255 to receive unnecessary psychotropic medications, be exposed to adverse health consequences from the medications, which could negatively impact the resident's mental, physical, and psychosocial well-being. Findings: Resident 255 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including dementia (the loss of cognitive functioning -thinking, remembering, and reasoning -to such an extent that it interferes with a person's daily life and activities) and anxiety (a feeling of fear, dread, and uneasiness). Review of Resident 255's Order Summary Report for the month of March 2024 indicated, .Lorazepam (medication used to treat anxiety) Oral Tablet 0.5 mg (milligram) Give 1 tablet by mouth every 4 hours as needed for anxiety .Start Date 11/25/23 . Review of Resident 255's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-21 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow physician's order of parameters regarding a pain medication for one of two sampled residents (Resident 233) when Resident 233 received an excessive dose of Hydromorphone (a potent pain medication). This failure has the potential to result in an adverse reaction (a harmful and unexpected effect of a medication) such as respiratory depression (slow breathing resulting in poor oxygen intake) Findings: A review of a policy titled Medication - Administration, last revised January 2012, indicated that If the PRN medication [Pro re nata, medication that is only given as needed for a specific reason or situation] is for complaint of pain, the Nurse will document the pain score prior to giving the medication . In addition, the policy indicated that Nursing Staff will keep in mind the seven 'rights' of medication [seven checks used to reduce risk of medication administration error] when administering medication . 'rights' of medication are: . the right amount [or dose of a medication]. During a concurrent…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-21 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — isolatedDispose of garbage and refuse properly.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a refuse (solid waste not carried by water through the sewage system) container were disposed in a proper manner with the lid. This failure had the potential to promote development and spread of communicable diseases and infections that could jeopardize the health of the residents in the facility. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 3/12/24 at 10:05 AM with Director of Food and Nutrition Services (DoFNS), and Clinical Services Manager (CSM) in the kitchen, a blue colored recycle container near flat top griddle was half-open and almost full of empty chocolate pudding cans with small pudding residue. CSM stated, Close when asked what to do with the lid of the blue colored recycle container. DoFNS disagreed, then stated, the lid of the container can be closed at the end of the day. During an interview on 3/13/24 at 2:23 PM with Infection Preventionist (IP) 2, and IP 3, when showed the pictures of the half-opened blue colored recycle container in the kitchen, IP 2 stated, the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-21 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain infection control program and practices designed to help prevent the development and transmission of diseases and infections when: 1. There was unopened Biohazard Spill Kit (a cleaning supply to remove the biohazard and disinfect the area) with expiration date of [DATE] in the garage storage. 2. The facility did not implement the correct cleaning and disinfecting practices of a glucometer (a machine used to test a resident's blood sugar at the bedside) after obtaining a blood glucose (sugar) for one of two sampled residents (Resident 133). These failures had the potential for spread of infection or bloodborne pathogens (bacteria or viruses in blood that can spread disease) to residents and staff. Findings: 1. During a concurrent observation and interview on [DATE] at 11:30 AM with Infection Preventionist (IP) 1 in the garage storage, there was an unopened Biohazard Spill Kit indicated, . Expiration: [DATE] . IP 1 acknowledged, it…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-21 · tag F0945 — failed to train staff on abuse prevention — isolatedInclude as part of its infection prevention and control program, mandatory training that includes written standards, policies, and procedures for the program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interviews and record review, the facility did not ensure staff were trained on infection control practices for oral suctioning, when eight residents have orders for suctioning PRN, nurses unable to tell protocol on change of tubes and cleaning the canister. This failure could result in break in infection control practice that could spread infection among residents. Findings: During an observation on 3/11/24, observed resident's bedside table with a suction machine with a suction tip, not dated, with all other personal hygiene items including oral care items. During an interview on 3/11/24 at 2:45PM, with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 2 , CNA 2 stated, resident is bedbound, total care, bedside table is like that, son's preference, I have not seen any nurse use this machine, son comes in the evening and use it per report to us. During an interview on 3/11/24 at 2:45 PM with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 3, per LVN 3 its' son's preference, he is the RP (responsible party) There is an order for suctioning . Have not seen him do it, it is care planned. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-21 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide reasonable accommodation for one of one sampled resident (Resident 122) when resident preference for a female Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) as caregiver was not provided. This failure resulted to Resident 122 verbalized she felt disrespected. Findings: A review of the face sheet indicated Resident 122 was admitted with diagnoses including stroke and anoxic brain damage (caused by lack of oxygen to the brain). A review of Minimum Data Set (MDS, a standard assessment tool) dated 2/2/24, Brief memory test to help determine cognitive functioning (BIMS, includes thinking, learning and decision making ability) score of 15 indicated Resident 122 was cognitively intact. During an interview oon 3/14/24, at 9:08 AM, Resident 122 stated, I told them that I prefer a female CNA but I get male CNA a lot of times. [CNA 7] said to me, I don't know why you don't want a male CNA. I don't want to be touched by a male. They continue to assign a male CNA to me. I feel disrespected. During an interview on 3/14/24, at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-21 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow their fall risk care plan for one of two sampled residents (Resident 209) when Resident 209 was transferred (moving a resident from one position to another) from the wheelchair to the bed with a two-person manual transfer (when two people physically lift someone to move them). This failure had the potential to result in a fall during transfers. Findings: A review of facility policy titled Fall Management Program, last revised 03/13/21, indicated that In an effort to prevent more falls, the IDT [Interdisciplinary Team, a collaborative group of people involved in a resident's care] will review and revised the care plan as necessary. A review of a face sheet (summary of resident's demographic and admitting information) for Resident 209, dated March 2024, indicated that Resident 209 has diagnoses including MUSCLE WEAKNESS and REPEATED FALLS. A review of Resident 209's Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool), dated 03/14/24,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-30 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice when: 1. There was no evidence that the physician was notified of Resident 1's abnormal urinalysis (a medical test where the urine is examined to diagnose and monitor various illnesses). 2. There was no evidence Resident 1 was transferred to wheelchair daily as per the physician's order. These failures caused a delay in provision of treatment to Resident 1 and could have compromised Resident 1's ability to maintain her highest practicable physical, mental, and/or psychosocial wellbeing. Findings: 1. Review of Resident 1's clinical records indicated Resident 1 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that include congestive heart failure (a long-term condition in which the heart cannot pump blood well enough to meet the body's needs), chronic respiratory failure (a condition that occurs when the lungs cannot get enough oxygen into the blood or eliminate enough carbon dioxide…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-20 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolatedProtect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of three sampled residents (Resident 9), was free from misappropriation of resident's property when Former Director of Nursing (FDON) took Resident 9's Ozempic medication and kept it in his office. This failure resulted in Resident 9 not receiving his Ozempic medication. Findings: Resident 9 was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including Multiple sclerosis (Disabling disease of the brain and spinal cord), Diabetes mellitus (Disease that affect how the body uses blood sugar), Heart Failure (heart can't pump blood well enough to meet body's need). Resident 9 Brief interview for mental status indicated 15, which means intact cognitive response. During an Interview on 10/5/23, at 2:05 PM., with Resident 9, Resident 9 stated FDON took and kept my Ozempic pen for a week and did not return it. I noticed when it was returned to me that 1 needle was missing. After a few weeks it was then that I found out that one dose was missing. I have no idea…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-20 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure accurate assessment was completed for one of 3 sampled residents (Resident 1) when Resident 1's physical behavioral symptom of abusing others sexually was not coded on the Minimum Data Set (MDS, a resident assessment tool) as of the Assessment Reference Date (ARD, specific endpoint for the look-back periods in the MDS assessment process). This failure had the potential to result in delayed identification and implementation of interventions for Resident 1's sexually inappropriate behavior; and the potential to place residents in the facility at risk for sexual abuse by Resident 1. Findings: Review of Resident 1's admission record indicated, was admitted to facility on 8/30/22 with diagnoses including schizophrenia (a disorder that affects a person's ability to think, feel, and behave clearly), dementia (a group of symptoms affecting memory, thinking and social abilities), history of alcohol abuse, mild cognitive impairment (trouble remembering,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-20 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to develop and implement a person-centered care plan (CP, a road map for patient care) for two of two sampled residents (Resident 7 and Resident 9) when: a. Resident 7 did not have a CP to address osteopenia (bone loss). This failure puts Resident 7 at risk to not receive necessary care and services to manage the possible complication from osteopenia. b. There was no care plan developed to address alleged incident of missing medication and medication not being given timely for Resident 9. This failure had the potential to delay the identification and implementation of appropriate corrective actions for a possible misappropriation of property. Findings: a. A review of the face sheet indicated Resident 7 was admitted with diagnoses including dementia (a decline in memory or other thinking skills), diabetes mellitus (abnormally high sugar level in the blood), and hypertension (abnormally high blood pressure). A review of the Minimum Data Set…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-20 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide necessary care and services to two of two sampled residents (Resident 10 and Resident 9) according to standards of practice when: a. There was no evidence of documentation of progress or decline during the stay in the facility for Resident 10. b. There was no evidence of documentation of pain assessment and management for Resident 10. c. There was no evidence of documentation prescribed medication was administered as ordered by the physician for Resident 10 and Resident 9. The facility failure has the potential for the residents to not receive necessary care and services and experience adverse effects due to untreated medical conditions. Findings: a. A review of the admission Summary for Resident 10 dated 10/24/22, indicated, . Diagnosis of closed left hip intertrochanteric (bones of the thigh) fracture status post (s/p) fall; s/p post open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF, a surgical procedure) of the fractured (broken bone)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2021-05-10 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and facility document review, the facility did not ensure safe and sanitation requirements were met when: 1. Handwashing sink faucet hot water was below the required temperature: 2. kitchen appliances, can opener, industrial mixer, plate warmer, ice machine, were found soiled during inspection. 3. food stuff found in open, unsealed, and undated packaging. These failures had the potential to place residents at risk for serious complications from food borne illness because of a compromised health status, in a susceptible population of 222 residents who received food from the kitchen out of a census of 231 residents. Findings: Review of the form CMS-672 Resident Census and Conditions of Residents completed by the facility dated 5/4/21, showed 222 of 235 residents residing in the facility received food prepared in the kitchen. 1. According to the USDA Food Code 2017, Warm water is more effective than cold water in removing fatty soils encountered in kitchens. An adequate flow of warm water will cause soap to lather and aid in flushing soil quickly from…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-05-10 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe medication storage and distribution practice when: 1) Twelve out of 13 eye drop bottles for seven residents, in nursing unit 2, were not labeled with residents names or with the date the medication was first open for use. 2) The facility did not provide any documented evidence that refrigerated medications were stored under appropriate temperature in one out of two medications room inspected. The refrigerator temperature for five days in May, May 1 to May 5, 2021 were not recorded. These failure had the potential for resident to receive wrong medications, contaminated medication, and/or ineffective medication. Findings: 1. During an inspection of the medication cart on 5/5/21, at 11:05 AM, in unit 2, accompanied by Licensed Nurse (LN) 4, 12 bottles of eye drop belonging to seven residents did not have labels which included the residents' names. These bottles also did not have the date when these bottles were first opened. The eye drops belonged to the following residents: Resident 165 Dorzolamide…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-05-10 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement infection control practices when: 1. Urinals (portable receptacles for urine) were found on the over bed table of three residents (Resident 99, Resident 150, and Resident 222); 2. The nebulizer set (a medical device used to administer medication directly and quickly to the lungs) placed at bedside of Resident 135 was uncovered and unlabeled; 3. A nasal cannula (a small, flexible tube that contains two open prongs intended to sit just inside the nostrils to deliver oxygen) for Resident 148 was found on the floor in his room; These failures could potentially lead to cross-contamination, placing the residents at risk for infections. Findings: 1. During an observation on 5/4/21 at 9:36 AM, Resident 150 was in bed and reading a book. On the left side of Resident 150's bed were a night stand and an over bed table (a table that often has a rectangular table-top and has a four-wheeled base that slides beneath the bed, and is used to provide a solid surface over a bed or chair to enable activities like…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-05-10 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the Physician's Orders for Life Sustaining Treatment [POLST- Patient indicated preferences regarding end-of-life care such as resuscitation measures and other life-sustaining treatment] was completed for one of eight sampled residents (Resident 102). This failure had the potential for the resident to receive incorrect or delayed treatment which is not compatible with the resident's or responsible party (RP)'s wishes during an emergency situation. Findings: A review of admission record indicated Resident 102 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including Type 2 diabetes mellitus (an impairment in the way the body regulates and uses blood sugar), hypertensive heart disease, dementia (impairment in memory, communication, and thinking). A review of the Minimum Data Set [MDS, a resident assessment and care screening], dated 3/8/21, indicated Resident 102 had severe cognitive impairment (ability to think…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-05-10 · tag F0582 — isolatedGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide notice of changes in Medicare coverage to the responsible party (RP) of one of three residents (Resident 59) when there was no evidence Resident 59's RP received the Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC) and the Skilled Nursing Facility Advance Beneficiary Notice of Non-Coverage (SNFABN). This failure may result in Resident 59's RP of not being sufficiently informed of their right to appeal to end Medicare coverage of skilled services, and of the potential financial responsibility for services rendered no longer covered by Medicare. Definition of Terms: NOMNC - a notice that informs the resident or the resident RP when the skilled services the resident is receiving is ending, and provides information on how to make an appeal. SNFABN - A notice that provides information to the resident or the resident RP of the potential financial responsibility if they wish to continue to receive skilled services that are no longer covered by Medicare.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-05-10 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop a person-centered care plan with specific interventions addressing fall prevention for one of 35 sampled residents (Resident 107) who had a history of repeated falls. This deficient practice placed Resident 107 at risk for further falls that could potentially result to harm and injuries. Findings: A review of Resident 107's clinical records indicated Resident 107 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including anxiety disorder (psychiatric disorder that involve extreme fear or worry), osteoarthritis of knee (inflammation, breakdown, and eventual loss of cartilage in the joints), glaucoma (damage to the eye's optic nerve which could cause vision loss), depression (a constant feeling of sadness and loss of interest, which stops you doing your normal activities), hypertension (high blood pressure), seizure (uncontrollable shaking that is rapid and rhythmic, with the muscles contracting and relaxing repeatedly), post-traumatic stress…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-05-10 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a safe environment when there was no fire safety signage indicating the administration of oxygen in room [ROOM NUMBER]. This failure could potentially compromise the safety of the residents, staff, and visitors. Findings: During a concurrent observation of room [ROOM NUMBER], and interview with Licensed Nurse (LN) 1, on 5/4/21 at 9:58 AM, Resident 100 was lying in bed, with a nasal cannula inserted into the resident's nostrils. The nasal cannula (a small, flexible tube that contains two open prongs intended to sit just inside the nostrils to deliver oxygen) was attached to an oxygen concentrator set at two liters per minute. There was no signage indicating the use of oxygen inside nor outside Resident 100's room. LN 1 verified the observation, and stated, . It (resident's room) must have a 'No Smoking' sign . we will put a sign . When asked of importance of placing a No Smoking sign, LN stated that the use of oxygen was a fire…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$104,000 in federal fines across 2 penalties. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.
- $40,118 — penalty dated 2025-07-03
- $63,882 — penalty dated 2024-01-30
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2025-08-02 for 9 days
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| COUNTY OF SAN MATEO | Organization | DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; 5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/01/1966 |
| BLAKE, ROBERT | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 10/28/2019 |
| KUNNAPPILLY, CHESTER | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 06/17/2002 |
| LARCINA, ROB | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 11/25/1991 |
| MCGREW, DAVID | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 05/28/2014 |
| PAPA, JENNIFER | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 10/14/2014 |
| TURSHANI, YOUSEF | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/08/2018 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 16 rows in the source record cover these 7 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
What families pay in CA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 555034. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-07-03, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.