Seacrest Post-Acute Care Center
1416 West 6th Street, San Pedro, CA 90732 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 80 certified beds · (310) 833-3526 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- CMS has flagged it for abuse
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Sep 2025
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (73) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $109,708 in federal fines (most recent 2025-08-31)
- its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- nursing-staff turnover (58%) runs well above the national median (45%)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 3 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 3 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 3 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 1 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 15.0% | 10.2% | 15.4% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 8.7% | 4.0% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 1.1% | 0.8% | 0.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 2.7% | 1.2% | 2.0% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 1.3% | 7.3% | 6.5% | better |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.4% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 0.9% | 1.6% | 3.3% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 14.0% | 9.8% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 6.0% | 13.7% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 98.2% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 1.1% | 4.3% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 19.3% | 10.2% | 21.2% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 7.8% | 12.0% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 3.4% | 1.5% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 98.5% | 93.2% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 32.6% | 23.0% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 14.5% | 11.2% | 12.0% | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
54.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 63 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.48 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 79% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 22% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 54.9%CMS range 44.3–64.1 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 11.5%CMS range 8.1–16.9 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 56.7% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.88 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 80 beds and averages 71.4 residents a day — about 89% occupied, or roughly 9 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.28 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.54 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.48 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.91 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.43 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.61 to 0.38 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 58% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
73 citations, most serious first. The 16 most serious are shown; the remaining 57 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · J2025-08-31 · tag F0678 — failed to provide CPR when needed — isolatedProvide basic life support, including CPR, prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel , subject to physician orders and the resident’s advance directives.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to: 1. Ensure, a resident who was a Full Code (a medical term indicating a person's consent to receive all possible life-saving measures), received basic life support ([BLS], care healthcare professionals provide to anyone whose heart stops beating suddenly), including cardiopulmonary resuscitation ([CPR] an emergency life-saving procedure to restart a person's heart [chest compressions)]) per the resident's Physician Order for Life Sustaining Treatment ([POLST] a form that contains written medical orders for healthcare professionals regarding the residents wishes for specific medical treatments that can or cannot be done during life threatening emergencies where the resident is incapacitated) and facility's policy and procedure, for one of one sampled resident (Resident 1).2. Ensure registered nurse (RN) 1 honored and followed Resident 1's POLST dated [DATE], and provided the resident with CPR/BLS when Resident 1 was found unresponsive (does not react to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2024-03-28 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolatedMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the hand sink in a resident's bathroom was inspected during daily rounds by the maintenance staff and/or the facility's administrative staff, to ensure it was mounted securely to the bathroom wall and did not detach and fall off the wall causing a resident to fall and sustain injuries for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1). This deficient practice resulted in the hand sink in Resident 1's bathroom detaching from the wall and falling to the floor when Resident 1 placed her hands on it while washing her face. Resident 1 fell to the floor and sustained a left hip fracture, a bump with discoloration to her left eye and a bump with discoloration to the left side of the back of her head. This deficient practice had the potential for Resident 1 to sustain more critical injuries including death. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (Face Sheet), the Face Sheet indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE],…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-02-16 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident, who was walking 85 feet with moderate assistance (about 25-50 percent [%] physical assistance) with a platform walker ([PFW] a type of assistive device with forearm supports to provide extra support during walking), did not decline in walking and subsequently stopped walking, and failed to ensure the resident, who had limited ROM to both lower extremities received restorative nursing treatment to prevent potential decline in ROM for two of 15 sampled residents (Resident 3 and Resident 47). The facility failed to: 1. Assist Resident 47 with ambulation during Restorative Nursing Aide ([RNA] nursing aide program that help residents to maintain their function and joint mobility) treatment to maintain function and ability to move (walking) in accordance with the Physical Therapy ([PT], profession aimed in the restoration, maintenance, and promotion of optimal physical function) Discharge Recommendation and Treatment Note…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-01-04 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) who had a history of multiple falls, was supervised, monitored, and provided with a Mat alarm (an alarm used on top of a mattress or in a wheelchair to help monitor residents when they rise from the bed or wheelchair to reduce falls and unnecessary injury) in his wheelchair as recommended the Interdisciplinary Team ([IDT] a group of health care professionals with various areas of expertise who work together toward the goals of a resident) to prevent Resident 1 from falling and sustaining an injury. The facility failed to: 1. Ensure Resident 1's care plan was revised to include IDT's recommendations made after Resident 1's fall on 11/13/2023 that included continued use of the Mat alarm, frequent visual checks, and placing Resident 1 in front of or close to the nursing station. 2. Ensure Resident 1's care observation was endorsed to the nursing staff at the nursing station when Resident 1 was placed next…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2023-12-01 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident, who was a high risk for falls, was transferred from a wheelchair to the bed by two persons for one of two sampled residents (Resident 1). The facility failed to: 1. Ensure a certified nursing assistant (CNA 1) and CNA 4 did not transfer Resident 1 from a wheelchair to bed without another staff assistance as indicated in the resident ' s untitled care plan. 2. Ensure CNA 1, CNA 4, and CNA 5 followed the facility ' s policy and procedure (P/P) titled Falls and Fall Risk, Managing by trying to prevent Resident 1 from falling during transfer from a wheelchair to bed by implementing the care plan intervention to have two person physical assistance for the resident ' s transfer. These deficient practices resulted in Resident 1 falling during transfer from a wheelchair to bed and sustaining a right femur (thighbone) fracture (broken bone) requiring transfer to a general acute care hospital (GACH) for right hip repair surgery. Findings:…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2023-12-01 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to manage pain for one of two sampled residents (Resident 1). The facility failed to: 1. Ensure the licensed vocational nurse (LVN 1) did not let Resident 1 experience excruciating pain without receiving pain medication for 17 and half hours after a fall. 2. Ensure LVN 1 notified Resident 1's physician of Resident 1 experiencing excruciating pain in the right leg after the resident fell; and obtain orders for pain medication. 3. Ensure LVN 1 assessed Resident 1 for pain location and pain severity when Resident 1 complained of pain after a fall. 4. Ensure Resident 1's physician was notified of the resident's fall for the physician to provide orders for timely treatment and transfer to a general acute care hospital (GACH). These deficient practices resulted in Resident 1 experiencing excruciating pain without receiving pain medication for 17 and half hours after the fall. Resident 1 was sent to the GACH on 11/16/2023 where the resident was diagnosed with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-05 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a Care Plan was created for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) after Resident 1 fell on 4/18/2026.This failure placed Resident 1 at risk for repeated falls, injury and further decline. Findings:During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (Face Sheet), the Face Sheet indicated Resident 1 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Resident 1 had diagnoses including heart failure (a heart disorder which causes the heart to not pump the blood efficiently, sometimes resulting in leg swelling), muscle wasting (weakening, shrinking and muscle loss) and type 2 diabetes mellitus ([DM] a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound healing).During a review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set ([MDS] a resident assessment tool), dated 2/20/2026, the MDS indicated Resident 1's cognition (the mental action or process of acquiring knowledge and understanding though thought, experiences,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-04-17 · tag F0576 — patternEnsure residents have reasonable access to and privacy in their use of communication methods.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure three of eight sampled residents (Resident's 1, 2, and 3) were provided privacy when using the telephone. These failures resulted in Resident's 1, 2, and 3 being unable to make personal phone calls without staff's presence and monitoring, violating their rights to private communication. These deficient practices had the potential to cause psychosocial harm, including fear of being overheard when discussing personal information, and feelings of distress and isolation due to lack of communication with family. Findings:During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (Face Sheet), the Face Sheet indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident 1 had diagnoses including diabetes mellitus ([DM] a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound healing) and chronic kidney disease ([CKD] a progressive loss in kidney function over a period of months or years).During a review of Resident 1's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-27 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide enough time for one of one sampled resident (Resident 30) to enjoy their meals.This failure resulted in Resident 30 feeling sad and frustrated. Findings:During a review of Resident 30's admission Record, dated 3/12/2026, the admission Record indicated Resident 30 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses but not limited to diabetes mellitus (a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound healing), hypertension (high blood pressure), and coronary artery disease (a narrowing or blockage of arteries supplying blood to the heart).During a review of Resident 30's Minimum Data Set (MDS -resident assessment tool), dated 3/19/2026, the MDS indicated Resident 30 was cognitively intact (ability to think, understand, learn, and remember).During an observation on 3/24/2026 at 12:51 p.m. in Resident 30's room, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 5 was quickly feeding Resident 30 their lunch meal.During…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-27 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of one sampled resident's (Resident 30) light cord was within reach.This failure resulted in Resident 30 feeling frustrated and the potential to increase the risk of the resident falling.Findings:During a review of Resident 30's admission record, dated 3/12/2026, the admission Record indicated Resident 30 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses but not limited to diabetes mellitus (a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound healing), hypertension (high blood pressure), and coronary artery disease (a narrowing or blockage of arteries supplying blood to the heart).During a review of Resident 30's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a comprehensive resident assessment tool), dated 3/19/2026, the MDS indicated Resident 30 was cognitively intact (ability to think, understand, learn, and remember).During an observation on 3/24/2026 at 9:10 a.m. in Resident 30's room, Resident 30 was laying in bed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-27 · tag F0640 — isolatedEncode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS-a comprehensive assessment and care screening tool) assessment dated [DATE] was transmitted to Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) within the 120-day time frame for one of six sampled residents (Resident 11).This failure had the potential for the delay in identifying resident care concerns needing an individualized care plan, providing residents interventions necessary to provide quality care and a delay in the reimbursement process.Findings:During a review of Resident 11's admission Record (face sheet) dated 3/26/2026, the admission record indicated Resident 11 was admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnosis including depression (mental health disorder characterized by persistently depressed mood or loss of interest in activities, causing significant impairment in daily life), atrial fibrillation (irregular heartbeat) and difficulty in walking.During a review of Resident 11's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-27 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the assessment entries on the Minimum Data Set (MDS), a standardized assessment and care screening tool) was accurate for two of six sampled residents (Resident 12 and 75) by failing to:1. Ensure Resident 12's hearing status was accurately coded to reflect Resident12 wore a hearing aid.2. Ensure Resident 75's dental status was accurately coded to reflect Resident 75's missing bottom teeth.These deficient practices had the potential to negatively affect Resident 12 and 75's plan of care and delivery of necessary care and services. Findings:1. During a review of Resident 12's admission Record (face sheet) dated 3/26/2026, the admission record indicated, Resident 12 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnosis including heart failure (heart muscle is unable to pump enough blood to meet the body's needs for blood and oxygen) , diabetes mellitus (a condition in which the body fails to process glucose…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-27 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to revise the communication plan of care for one of six sampled residents, (Resident 12) who was hard of hearing to reflect Resident 12's current care plan.This failure had the potential to negatively affect the care and services for Resident 12.Findings:During a review of Resident 12's admission Record (face sheet) dated 3/26/2026, the admission record indicated, Resident 12 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnosis including heart failure (heart muscle is unable to pump enough blood to meet the body's needs for blood and oxygen), diabetes mellitus (a condition in which the body fails to process glucose (sugar) correctly), dementia (loss of memory, language, problem-solving and other thinking abilities).During a review of Resident 12's History and Physical (H&P) dated 1/30/2026, the H&P indicated, Resident 12 did not have the capacity to understand and make decisions.During a review of Resident 12's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-27 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident who is unable to carry out activities of daily living receives services to maintain good grooming for one of three residents sampled residents (Resident 60) by failing to change Resident 60's soiled incontinent pad ( absorbent pad worn by residents) for long period of time. This deficient practice resulted in Resident 60 feeling frustrated and embarrassed, due to lack of or delay in receiving sufficient services to maintain good grooming, and incontinent care and had the potential to lead to skin breakdown. Findings:During a review of Resident 60's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 60 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including, muscle weakness generalized ( loss of power or function affecting most of the body), difficulty in walking, muscle wasting and atrophy (refers to the loss or thinning of muscle tissue).During a review of Resident 60's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-27 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure Certified Nursing Assistant 4 (CNA 4) report changes in resident skin condition for one of four sampled residents (Resident 60).The facility failed to:1. Ensure CNA 4 completed required daily shift body check and skin assessment for Resident 60 on 3/24/2026.These failures placed Resident 60 at increased risk for delayed identification and treatment of skin breakdown.Findings:During a review of Resident 60's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 60 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including, muscle weakness generalized ( loss of power or function affecting most of the body), difficulty in walking, muscle wasting and atrophy (refers to the loss or thinning of muscle tissue).During a review of Resident 60's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a resident assessment tool) dated 03/01/2026, the MDS indicated Resident 60 had moderately cognitive (ability to think, understand, learn, and remember) impairment.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-27 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to assess one of four sampled residents (Resident 56) who had indwelling urinary catheter (a flexible plastic tube inserted into the bladder that remains there to provide continuous urinary drainage) upon admission to determine the indication for the catheter and whether it should be removed.This failure placed Resident 56 at risk for unnecessary indwelling urinary catheter use, potential infection, lose ability to regain control of bladder function and other complications related to improper catheter management.Findings:During a review of Resident 56's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 56 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including, muscle weakness generalized ( a loss of power or function affecting most of the body), difficulty in walking, retention of urine, (the inability to completely or partially empty the bladder, causing pain, discomfort, and a strong urge to urinate without success). During…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 57 citations
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-27 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure one of three sampled residents ( Resident 27) maintained adequate nutritional status. The facility failed to:1.Provide one-on-one feeding assistance ( a staff member supports a single resident with eating for the entire meal) as ordered.2.Ensure Boost (nutritional supplement) was administered to Resident 27 as ordered.3.Monitor and respond to Resident 27's declining meal intake.4.Ensure effective communication and follow-through of Registered Dietician nutritional interventions.These deficient practices placed Resident 27 at risk for inadequate nutritional and fluid intake which could lead to malnutrition (a condition resulting from an unbalanced diet), significant weight loss, dehydration (not having enough water in the body), skin impairment, hypoglycemia (low blood sugar), aspiration (the accidental breathing in of food, liquid, saliva, or vomit into the airway and lungs), and subsequently resulted in Resident 27 being admitted to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-27 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were not left open and unattended for one of four sampled residents (Resident 63)'s bedside.This deficient practice placed Resident 63 at risk for medication errors, including missed, duplicated, or inappropriate administration.Findings:During a review of Resident 63's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 63 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including chronic kidney disease (lasting damage to the kidneys), and transient ischemic attack ([TIA]-brief episode of neurologic [relating to the nervous system] dysfunction).During a review of Resident 63's Minimum Data Set (MDS a resident assessment tool) dated 3/11/2026, the MDS indicated Resident 63 required dependent assistance (helper does all of the effort) with toileting, oral hygiene, bathing, and showering.During a concurrent observation and interview on 3/24/2026 at 10:53 a.m. with Resident 63, open medications (nine pills) were…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-27 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure a monthly Medication Regimen Review ([MRR]- a thorough evaluation of a patient's complete medication list to ensure the medication therapy is safe, necessary, and effective) was conducted and maintained by a licensed pharmacist for one of three residents Resident (27). This failure resulted in a lack of professional oversight to identify potential medication irregularities and placed the residents at risk for adverse drug events, excessive sedation, and the continued use of potentially unnecessary medications.Findings: During a review of Resident 27's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 27 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities), and diabetes mellitus type 2 (DM-a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound healing).During a review of Resident 27's Minimum Data Set (MDS a resident assessment…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-27 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolatedProvide or obtain dental services for each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure one of six sampled residents (Resident 75) was seen by a dentist for her broken, loose missing teeth.This failure had the potential to result in the inability to effectively chew foods, weight loss, lack of energy and loss of muscle mass for Resident 75.Findings:During a review of Resident 75's admission Record (face sheet) dated 3/26/2026, the admission record indicated Resident 75 was admitted to the facility with diagnosis including breast cancer (rapid growth of abnormal cells), atrial fibrillation (irregular heartbeat) and muscle weakness.During a review of Resident 75's History and Physical (H&P) dated 1/30/2026, the H&P indicated, Resident 75 was alert and oriented.During a review of Resident 75's Minimum Data Set (MDS) a standardized assessment and care screening tool) dated 3/6/2026, the MDS indicated Resident 75 had moderate cognitive impairment. The MDS indicated Resident 12 needed substantial/maximal assistance (helper does more than half the work) with activities of daily living ([ADLs]…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-27 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the accuracy of the medical record for one of three residents (Resident 63). As evidence by documentation indicating medications were administered on 3/24/2026 at 8:08 a.m., while observation revealed medications were left opened/unattended at the bedside and not confirmed as administered.This deficient practice resulted in inaccurate documentation of medication administration and had the potential to affect Resident 63's treatment and care.Findings:During a review of Resident 63's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 63 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including chronic kidney disease (lasting damage to the kidneys), and transient ischemic attack ([TIA]-brief episode of neurologic [relating to the nervous system] dysfunction).During a review of Resident 63's Minimum Data Set (MDS a resident assessment tool) dated 3/11/2026, the MDS indicated Resident 63 required dependent assistance…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-27 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure infection control measures were observed for three of six sampled residents (Residents 6, 12 and 79). The facility failed to:1.Ensure signage for Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP- infection control intervention using gown and gloves during high contact resident care activities designed to reduce the transmission of multi-drug-resistant organisms {microorganisms, predominantly bacteria, that are resistant to one or more classes of antimicrobial agents}) was in place for Resident 6.2.Ensure the laundry staff cleaned and documented the dryer lint trap screens every two hours.3.Ensure the kitchen staff monitored and documented the refrigerator temperatures.4. Ensure staff member wore personal protective equipment (PPE-gown, gloves) before providing patient care to Resident 12 who was on EBP for stasis ulcers (open sores).5. Ensure Resident 79's care giver removed PPE before exiting Resident 79's room to walk down the hallway after…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-27 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — isolatedImplement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement their protocol for Antibiotic Stewardship (refers to a set commitments and actions designed to optimize the treatment of infections while reducing the adverse events associated with antibiotic use) for two of three sampled residents (Resident 54 and Resident 66).This deficient practice had the potential for Resident 54 and Resident 66 to develop antibiotic resistance (not effective to treat infection) from unnecessary or inappropriate antibiotic use.Findings:1. During a review of Resident 54's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 54 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. The admission Record indicated Resident 54 was admitted with diagnoses including cerebral infarction (stroke, loss of blood flow to a part of the brain) and hypertension (HTN- high blood pressure).During a review of Resident 54's Minimum Data Set (MDS- a resident assessment tool) dated 2/28/2026, the MDS indicated Resident 54's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-27 · tag F0912 — isolatedProvide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to:1. Ensure adequate room size and space to support the comfort and well being for one of six sampled residents (Resident 59).2. Ensure 6 of 26 residents' rooms (Rooms 21, 22, 23, 25, 26 and 27) met the requirements of 80 square feet for each resident.This failure had the potential to negatively impact Resident 59's quality of life by limiting his ability to move freely and safely within his living space and had the potential to result in inadequate provision of safe nursing care and a lack of privacy for residents.Findings:During a concurrent observation and interview on 3/26/2026 at 8:22 a.m. with Resident 59 at bedside, Resident 59's television (TV) stand was observed to be blocking Resident 59 from being able to maneuver his w/c to the left side of his bed. Resident 59 stated this room is way too small for him. Resident 59 TV stand had to be moved for him to get to the left side of his bed. Resident 59 stated there was nothing he could…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-10 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify the physician when Resident 2 presented a new wandering behavior for one of three sampled residents. This failure resulted in Resident 2's wandering behaviors not being addressed and a physical altercation between Resident 1 and Resident 2. Findings: During a review of Resident 2's admission record, the admission record indicated Resident 2 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including schizoaffective disorder (a mental illness that can affect thoughts, mood, and behavior)- bipolar (sometimes called manic-depressive disorder- mood swings that range from the lows of depression to elevated periods of emotional highs) type, and depression (persistent sadness and a lack of interest or pleasure in previously rewarding or enjoyable activities). During a review of Resident 2's History and Physical (H&P), dated 7/21/2025, the H&P indicated Resident 2 did not have the capacity to understand and make decisions. During a review…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-10 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Resident 1 and Resident 2 were free from abuse when Resident 1 and Resident 2 got into a physical altercation on 8/25/2025. The facility failed to ensure: A. Resident 1 received Trazadone (medication for depression [persistent sadness and a lack of interest or pleasure in previously rewarding or enjoyable activities] and insomnia) for three days (8/23/2025, 8/24/2025, and 8/25/2025).B. Resident 2's episodes of wandering (walking around without a specific goal or purpose) and behaviors of taking items from snack carts were communicated to the provider or addressed in a care plan.3.Implement the facility's policy and procedure titled, Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation and Misappropriation Prevention Program, revised April 2021 which indicated residents have the right to be free from abuse. These deficient practices resulted in a physical altercation between Resident 1 and Resident 2 on 8/25/2025 at approximately 8:30 p.m. when:1. Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-09-10 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolatedPrevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a psychotropic (any medication capable of affecting the mind, emotions, and behavior) medication was not used unnecessarily for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) by: 1. Failing to monitor manifested behaviors for which Trazadone (medication used to treat depression or insomnia) was prescribed for three consecutive days2. Failing to monitor adverse effects of Trazadone 3. Failing to obtain an active psychotropic informed consent (a process to ensure a resident or the resident's representative receives and understands information about a treatment or medication including its risks, benefits) for Trazadone administration for one of three sampled residents. This failure had the potential to result in lack of identification of adverse effects and the potential to violate the resident's right to be informed or refuse care.Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission record, the admission record indicated Resident 1 was initially…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-10 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to update a care plan for a new wandering behavior for one of three sampled residents, when Resident 2 was found with new wandering behaviors. This failure resulted in Resident 2's wandering behaviors not being addressed and a physical altercation between Resident 1 and Resident 2. Findings: During a review of Resident 2's admission record, the admission record indicated Resident 2 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including schizoaffective disorder (a mental illness that can affect thoughts, mood, and behavior)- bipolar (sometimes called manic-depressive disorder- mood swings that range from the lows of depression to elevated periods of emotional highs) type, and depression (persistent sadness and a lack of interest or pleasure in previously rewarding or enjoyable activities). During a review of Resident 2's History and Physical (H&P), dated 7/21/2025, the H&P indicated Resident 2 did not have the capacity to understand and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-10 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolatedEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of two sampled employees, Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 1, was competent in medication administration upon hire. This failure resulted in Resident 1 not receiving trazadone for three days on 8/23/2025, 8/24/2025 and 8/25/2025.Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission record, the admission record indicated Resident 1 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including urinary tract infection (UTI- an infection in the bladder/urinary tract), Heart failure (a heart disorder which causes the heart to not pump the blood efficiently, sometimes resulting in leg swelling), and major depressive disorder (persistent sadness and a lack of interest or pleasure in previously rewarding or enjoyable activities). The admission record indicated Resident 1's brother was the responsible party (RP-decision maker). During a review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a resident assessment tool), dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-31 · tag F0573 — isolatedLet each resident or the resident's legal representative access or purchase copies of all the resident's records.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, facility failed to provide medical records upon request for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) when Resident 1's responsible party (RP1) requested Resident 1's records on 10/11/2024.During a review of Resident 1's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease ([COPD] a chronic lung disease causing difficulty in breathing), chronic diastolic heart failure ( heart disorder that causes the heart to not pump blood effectively) and ischemic heart disease (condition where the blood vessels that supply the heart muscle become narrowed or blocked). During a review of Resident 1's History and Physical (H&P) dated 4/13/2024, the H&P indicated Resident 1 had the capacity to understand and make decisions. During a review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set ([MDS] a resident assessment tool) dated 8/29/2024, the MDS indicated Resident 1's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-04-11 · tag F0712 — patternEnsure that the resident and his/her doctor meet face-to-face at all required visits.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a physician visited one of four sampled residents (Resident 1) at least once every 60 days. This deficient practice had the potential to result in an undetected decline in medical, health or psychosocial condition and can lead to a delay in necessary care, treatment and services. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 1 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis including Type 2 diabetes (disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound healing) , dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities), anemia (a condition where the body does not have enough healthy red blood cells), and peripheral vascular disease (PVD - a slow progressive narrowing of the blood flow to the arms and legs). During a review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS), a resident assessment tool, dated 2/20/2025, the MDS indicated Resident 1's cognitive…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-19 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to protect one of three sampled residents (Resident 2) who is legally blind verbally abuse repeatedly by Resident 1. This deficient practice resulted in Resident 2 feel unsafe and uncomfortable. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including cerebral infarction (disruptive blood flow to the brain), and paranoid personality disorder (a mental condition in which a person has a long-term pattern of distrust and suspicion of others). During a review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS- a resident assessment tool) dated 3/11/2025, the MDS indicated Resident 1's cognition (ability to think, understand, learn, and remember) was intact and required moderate assistance with toileting, dressing, and personal hygiene. During a review of Resident 1's care plan initiated 9/26/2024, the care plan focus was physical abuse, with goals including…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-02-28 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe and sanitary food storage and preparation practices when: 1.There was no trash receptacle (trash can) next to the handwashing sink area in the kitchen. 2. One Dietary Aide (DA1) working in the dish machine area did not wash hands and change gloves when removing the clean and sanitized dishes from the dish machine. 3. Several food items were stored in the refrigerator with dates exceeding storage periods for the ready to eat food. There were 25 previously prepared vanilla flavored pudding and 25 previously prepare chocolate flavored pudding stored in small single serve plastic cups with date of 2/21/2025 exceeding storage period for pudding were stored in the reach in refrigerator. There were 20 single serve cartons of Nutritional Supplements that were voluntarily recalled by manufacturer for potential contamination with listeria (Listeria infection is a foodborne bacterial illness that can be very serious for pregnant women,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-02-28 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to: 1. Ensure Resident 54's Humalog [NAME] KwikPen ([generic name - insulin lispro] a medication used to treat high blood sugar) in medication cart was labeled with an 'open date' to ensure medication was not expired prior to medication administration, affecting one of ten reviewed residents. 2. Ensure medications requiring refrigeration were stored in accordance with manufacturer specifications and per facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Storage of Medications, dated 08/2019 at temperature range of 36 degrees Fahrenheit [(°F) is a unit of temperature] to 46°F or 2° Celsius [(°C) is a unit of temperature] to 8°C, affecting two of two facility's medication room refrigerators (Station 1 Medication Room Refrigerator and Station 2 Medication Room Refrigerator). These failures had the potential to result in Residents 54 and other residents receiving medications that had become expired, ineffective, or toxic due to improper storage and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-28 · tag F0557 — isolatedHonor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation interview and record review the facility failed to ensure one of 16 reviewed residents (Resident 29) personal items were returned to Resident 29 after being laundered. This failure resulted in Resident 29's blankets being lost, missing, and received a blanket that did not belong to him. Findings: During a review of Resident 29's, admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 29 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including hypertension (HTN-high blood pressure), bladder cancer (a type of cancer that starts in the cells lining of the bladder), Alzheimer's (a disease characterized by a progressive decline in mental abilities) dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities), diabetes mellitus (DM-a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound healing), dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), and need for assistance with personal care. During a review of Resident 29's Minimum Data Set (MDS-a resident assessment tool), dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-28 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, facility failed to ensure call light was within reach for one of five reviewed residents (Resident 139). This failure had the potential to put Resident 319's safety at risk and not meet his personal needs. Findings: During a review of Resident 319's admission Record, the admission Record indicated, Resident 319 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including multiple myeloma (blood cancer), difficulty walking, muscle weakness, dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities). During a review of Resident 319's History & Physical (H&P) dated 11/27/24, the H&P indicated, Resident 319 does not have the capacity to understand and make decision. During a review of Resident 319's Minimum Data Set (MDS- a resident assessment tool) dated 12/3/24, the MDS indicated Resident 319's cognition (ability to think, understand, learn, and remember) is severely impaired. The MDS indicated that Resident 319 needs substantial/maximal assist (helper does…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-28 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and/or implement an individualized person-centered plan of care with measurable objectives, timeframe, and interventions to meet the resident's needs for one of four reviewed residents (Resident 38). This failure had the potential to negatively affect the delivery of necessary care and services to Resident 38. Findings: During a review of Resident 38's admission Record, the admission Record indicated, Resident 38 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnoses including ovarian cancer (a growth of cells that forms in the ovaries [female organ that produce eggs]), type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM-a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound healing) hypertension (HTN-high blood pressure). During a review of Resident 38's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a resident assessment tool) dated 2/04/2025, the MDS indicated Resident 38's cognition (ability to think, understand, learn, and remember) was intact.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-28 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide care in accordance with professional standards of practice for one of five reviewed residents (Resident 22) investigated for use of unnecessary psychotropic (any medication capable of affecting the mind, emotions, and behavior) drug, by failing to ensure a medical diagnosis or indication was documented to support administration of Seroquel (generic name - quetiapine, a medication used to treat schizophrenia [a mental illness that is characterized by disturbances in thought]. This failure had the potential to place Resident 22 at risk for significant adverse consequences (unwanted, uncomfortable, or dangerous effects that a drug may have) from the use of unnecessary psychotropic drug, which could result to impairment or decline in the resident's mental, physical condition, functional, and psychosocial status. Findings: During a review of Resident 22's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 22 was admitted to the facility on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-28 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure denture care was done for one of 16 reviewed residents (Resident 29). This failure resulted in Resident 29's dentures not being cleaned and stored properly in a denture container. Findings: During a review of Resident 29's, admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 29 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including hypertension (HTN-high blood pressure), bladder cancer (a type of cancer that starts in the cells lining of the bladder), Alzheimer's (a disease characterized by a progressive decline in mental abilities) dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities), diabetes mellitus (DM-a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound healing), dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), and need for assistance with personal care. During a review of Resident 29's Care Plan, titled Oral/Dental Care, dated 3/8/2023, the Care Plan indicated goal of adequate oral/dental…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-28 · tag F0694 — isolatedProvide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure two of two reviewed residents (Residents 20 and 319) intravenous catheter (IV - a flexible tube that is inserted into vein to deliver fluids or medications) was maintained in accordance with professional standard of practice. The facility failed to: a.Ensure Resident 20's IV catheter was removed in a timely manner after Resident 20's IV therapy was completed. b.Ensure Resident 318/'s IV site was changed Rotated when Resident 318's IV site was not changed for 14 days. This failure had the potential to cause an infection at the insertion site. Findings: During a review of Resident 20's admission Record, the admission Record indicated, Resident 20 was admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with the diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD-a chronic lung disease causing difficulty in breathing), takotsubo syndrome (causes chest pain, shortness of breath, symptoms mimic a heart attack), sepsis (a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-28 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolatedEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 4 was trained and had knowledge of conducting a blood pressure (BP) check for one of ten reviewed residents (Resident 368) prior to determining whether hydralazine (a medication used to treat hypertension [high blood pressure]) should be administered per parameters ordered by physician. This failure had the potential for medication errors, hypertension, hypotension (low blood pressure) and hospitalization for Resident 368. Findings: During a review of Resident 368's admission Record, dated 2/27/2025, the admission Record indicated, Resident 368 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including but not limited to, essential (primary) hypertension, end stage renal disease (irreversible kidney failure) and dependence on renal dialysis (a treatment to cleanse the blood of wastes and extra fluids artificially through a machine when the kidney(s) have failed). During a review of Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-28 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to administer medications in accordance with physician order and manufacturer specifications for two of ten reviewed residents (Residents 37 and 367) by failing to: a. Ensure Resident 37's Aspirin (a medication used to prevent heart attack [flow of blood and oxygen is blocked] and stroke [loss of blood flow to a part of the brain]) chewable tablet was administered as chewable during medication administration. b. Clarify order with physician and administer Resident 367's Vitamin D3 (also referred as cholecalciferol - a vitamin used to treat low level of vitamin D) within 60 minutes of its prescribed time as per facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Medication Administration - General Guidelines, dated 11/2021. These failures of not administering medications to Residents 37 and 367 in accordance with physician orders or professional standards of practice had the potential to result in vitamin deficiency, stroke (damage to the brain…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-28 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility and consultant pharmacist (a professional responsible for reviewing each resident's medication profile monthly to identify and report changes) failed to identify irregularities during medication regimen review ( MRR a comprehensive evaluation of a patient's current medication list to identify potential drug interactions, adverse effects, and other medication-related issues) related to administration of Seroquel (generic name - quetiapine, a medication used to treat schizophrenia [a mental illness that is characterized by disturbances in thought] without a medical diagnosis or indication, affecting one of five reviewed residents for unnecessary medications (Resident 22). This failure of failing to identify and report irregularities resulted in Resident 22 receiving quetiapine unnecessarily without an indication possibly resulting in medication side effects (a secondary, typically undesirable effect of a drug or medical treatment) and leading to a decrease in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-28 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of five reviewed residents (Resident 22), for unnecessary medication care area, was free from the use of unnecessary psychotropic drug (any medication capable of affecting the mind, emotions, and behavior) by failing to ensure there was a medical diagnosis and/or indication to support the administration of Seroquel (generic name - quetiapine, a medication used to treat schizophrenia [a mental illness that is characterized by disturbances in thought]. This failure had the potential to place Resident 22 at risk for significant adverse consequences (unwanted, uncomfortable, or dangerous effects that a drug may have) from the use of unnecessary psychotropic drug, which could result to impairment or decline in the resident's mental, physical condition, functional, and psychosocial status. Findings: During a review of Resident 22's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 22 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-28 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain a medication error rate of less than 5 percent (%) during medication pass for three of ten reviewed residents (Residents 54, 37 and 367) by failing to: a. Ensure Resident 54's Humalog [NAME] KwikPen ([generic name - insulin lispro] a medication used to treat high blood sugar) in medication cart was labeled with an 'open date' to ensure medication was not expired prior to medication administration. b. Ensure Resident 37's Aspirin (a medication used to prevent heart attack [flow of blood and oxygen is blocked] and stroke [loss of blood flow to a part of the brain]) chewable tablet was administered as a chewable during medication administration. c. Clarify order with physician and administer Resident 367's Vitamin D3 (also referred as cholecalciferol - a vitamin used to treat low level of vitamin D) within 60 minutes of its prescribed time as per facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Medication Administration - General…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-28 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — isolatedProvide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure kitchen staff were routinely trained and evaluated for competency related to their duties when: 1.Dietary Aide (DA 1) did not know the proper sanitizer test strip to use for the dish machine sanitizer and the concentration strength of the chlorine sanitizer used in the dish machine (chlorine sanitizer a product that is used to reduce or eliminate pathogenic agents on surfaces). This failure had the potential to result in unsafe and unsanitary food production that could place 60 out of 62 residents in the facility who received food at risk for food borne illness (illness cause by food contaminated with bacteria, viruses, parasites, or toxins ) Findings: During an observation on 2/25/2025 at 10:15 a.m., in the dishwashing area, DA1 was requested to check the dish machine sanitizer concentration (chlorine sanitizer). DA1 attempted to pick up the QUAT sanitizer test strips (QUAT another type of sanitizer) to test the sanitizer concentration in the dish machine. [NAME] 2 stopped DA1 and asked to look for the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-28 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to observe infection control measures by not ensuring staff perform hand hygiene for one of one reviewed resident (Resident 33). This failure had the potential to result in cross contamination (the physical movement or transfer of harmful bacteria from one person, object, or place to another) and place the residents at risk for the spread of infection. Findings: During a review of Resident 33's admission Record dated 2/28/25 the admission Record indicated, Resident 33 was admitted on [DATE] with the diagnoses including osteomyelitis (bone infection) left ankle and foot, type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM-a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound healing), partial traumatic amputation (surgically cutting off limb) of left foot. During a review of Resident 33's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a resident assessment tool) dated 2/11/25, the MDS indicated Resident 33's cognition (ability to think, understand, learn, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-28 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — isolatedImplement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a Surveillance Data Collection form was completed for one of 16 reviewed residents (Resident 39) who received Keflex (antibiotic used to treat infections caused by bacteria) 500 milligrams (mg-unit of measurement) by mouth twice a day from 1/23/2025 to 1/30/2025 to treat a urinary tract infection (UTI- an infection in the bladder/urinary tract). This failure had the potential to put Resident 39 at risk for antibiotic resistance (when bacteria change to resist antibiotics used to effectively treat them) and inappropriate use of antibiotic. Findings: During a review of Resident 39's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 39 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including urinary tract infections, diabetes mellitus (DM-a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound healing), bronchitis (inflammation of the bronchial tubes, the airways that carry air…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-28 · tag F0940 — failed to train staff — isolatedDevelop, implement, and/or maintain an effective training program for all new and existing staff members.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that staff were being in serviced (staff education) for dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities) care. This failure had the potential to jeopardize the safety of residents when staff are not adequately trained. Findings: During an interview on 2/27/2025 at 12:21 p.m., with Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) 1, CNA 1 stated that she had not received dementia training. CNA 1 stated that she does provide care for residents with dementia in the facility. CNA 1 stated staff should receive dementia training because residents with dementia require special care. CNA 1 stated residents with dementia need to be approached and communicated differently. CNA 1 stated residents with dementia could become agitated easily if they are not approach appropriately. CNA 1 stated that residents with dementia could become combative and injure the other residents and staff if not approached appropriately. During an interview on 2/27/2025 at 12:33 p.m., with CNA 2 stated that she provides care for residents with dementia. CNA…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-13 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to notify the physician that one of one resident (Resident 1) has been noncompliant with taking Risperidone (medication is used to treat certain mental/mood disorders) 0.25 milligrams every 8 hours as ordered. This deficient practice had the potential to result in the delay of care for Resident 1 who may need alternative treatment measures prescribed by the physician due to noncompliance of taking the Risperidone. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Record, the admission record indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis including malignant neoplasm (abnormal growth of tissue or cancerous tumor) of the right breast, schizophrenia (disorder that affects a person's ability to think, feel, and behave clearly), anxiety disorder (mental health disorder characterized by feelings of worry, anxiety, or fear that are strong enough to interfere with one's daily activities), and bipolar disorder (a mental illness that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-13 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to develop care plan for one of one resident ' s (Resident 1) noncompliance with care. This deficient practice had the potential to result in the delay of care for Resident 1 who may need alternative interventions and measures. Findings: During a review of Resident 1 ' s admission Record, the admission record indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis including malignant neoplasm (abnormal growth of tissue or cancerous tumor) of the right breast, schizophrenia (disorder that affects a person's ability to think, feel, and behave clearly), anxiety disorder (mental health disorder characterized by feelings of worry, anxiety, or fear that are strong enough to interfere with one's daily activities), and bipolar disorder (a mental illness that causes unusual shifts in a person's mood, energy, activity levels, and concentration). During a review of Resident 1 ' s Minimum Data Set ([MDS] a standardized assessment and care…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-13 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide quality care in accordance with professional standards of practice when the facility failed to ensure one of one resident ' s (Resident 5) lower extremities edema (fluid retention in the body) was assessed after it was identified on 6/21/2024. This deficient practice had the potential to result in unidentified complications with worsening edema and result in poor resident health outcomes. Findings: During a record review of Resident 5 ' s admission Record, the admission record indicated Resident 5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis including type 2 diabetes (long-term condition in which the body has trouble controlling blood sugar and using it for energy), contusion (bruise) of lower back, hypertension (condition in which the force of the blood against the artery walls is too high), difficulty walking, muscle weakness, and atherosclerosis (buildup of fats, cholesterol and other substances in and on the artery walls) of aorta…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-13 · tag F0776 — isolatedProvide timely, approved x-ray services, or have an agreement with an approved provider to obtain them.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure one of one resident ' s (Resident 5) echocardiogram (imaging test that checks the structure and function of the heart) was completed as ordered on 6/22/2024. This deficient practice resulted in a delay of care that had the potential to result in a continued undiagnosed heart problem for Resident 1. Findings: During a review of Resident 5 ' s admission Record, the admission record indicated Resident 5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis including type 2 diabetes (long-term condition in which the body has trouble controlling blood sugar and using it for energy), hypertension (condition in which the force of the blood against the artery walls is too high), difficulty walking, and atherosclerosis (buildup of fats, cholesterol and other substances in and on the artery walls) of aorta (main blood vessel of the body). During a review of Resident 5 ' s Minimum Data Set ([MDS] a standardized assessment and care screening tool) dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-28 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — patternSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure documentation was completed and correct when the hand sink in the bathroom for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) fell off the wall causing Resident 1 to fall to the floor, breaking her hip and causing her to sustain a bump to her left eye and the left side of the back of her head. This deficient practice resulted in confusion regarding the timeline of events related to Resident 1's fall, and the inability to determine what Resident 1's actual assessment was after her fall including the subsequent discovery of Resident 1's injuries. This deficient practice had the potential for a delay in evaluation and treatment and non-continuity of care. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (Face Sheet), the Face Sheet indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including cerebral infarction [stroke] occurs when blood flow is disrupted to the brain) affecting Resident 1's left side, dementia…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-02-16 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — widespreadSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain timely and accurate resident medical records for five of 15 sampled residents (Resident 47, 3,15,19 and 38) when: a. Resident 47's January and February 2024 Restorative Nursing Aide (RNA, nursing aide program that help residents to maintain their function and joint mobility) Documentation Survey Report (record of nursing assistant tasks) was not accurately documented indicating Resident 47 received RNA for ambulation (walking) and ambulated when Resident 47 did not receive RNA treatment for ambulation and/or did not walk. b. Resident 47's quarterly (every three months) Joint Mobility Assessment ([JMA] assessment of joints to monitor joint range of motion {ROM, full movement potential of a joint}) dated 1/10/24 was completed on 2/14/24 (about one month later). c. Resident 3's quarterly Joint Mobility assessment dated [DATE] was completed on 11/7/23 (about one month later) and quarterly Joint Mobility assessment dated [DATE] was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-02-16 · tag F0655 — patternCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure two of 15 sampled residents (Resident 41and Resident 256) baseline care plans were developed and implemented. a. The facility failed to address Speech Therapy in the Care Plan for Resident 41 who was receiving Speech Therapy daily three times a week for four weeks due to dysphagia (difficulty swallowing). b. The facility failed to address mood and behavior concerns in the Care Plan for Resident 256 who was diagnosed with anxiety (intense, excessive, and persistent worry and fear about everyday situations) and depression (mental state of low mood and aversion (a strong dislike) to activity) and taking medications for anxiety. These failures had the potential to result in a delay of Resident 41 and Resident 256 not receiving the necessary care and services. Findings: a. During a review of Resident 41's admission Record (Face Sheet), the Face Sheet indicated, Resident 41 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of but not limited to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-16 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure two of 15 sampled residents (Resident 41 and Resident 256) Comprehensive Care Plan was developed to address speech therapy, mood, and behavior concerns. a. the facility failed to address speech therapy in the Care Plan for Resident 41 who was receiving Speech Therapy daily three times a week for four weeks due to dysphagia (difficulty swallowing). b. the facility failed to address mood and behavior concerns in the Care Plan for Resident 256 who was diagnosed with anxiety and depression and taking medications for anxiety. These failures had the potential to result in a delay of Resident 41 and Resident 256 not receiving the necessary care and services. Findings: a. During a review of Resident 41's admission Record (Face Sheet), the Face Sheet indicated, Resident 41 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of but not limited to gastro-esophageal reflux disease, muscle weakness, dementia, and chronic constipation. During a review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-16 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — patternImplement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement their protocol for Antibiotic Stewardship for two of two sampled residents (Resident 46 and 47) by failing to: a.Resident 46 was prescribed antibiotic drug without meeting the criteria, before being screen for urinary tract infection ([UTI]an infection in any part of the urinary system). b.Resident 47 was prescribed antibiotic drug without meeting the criteria, before being screen for upper respiratory tract infection. These failures had the potential for resident to develop antibiotic resistance (not effective to treat infection) from unnecessary or inappropriate antibiotic use. Findings: a. During a record review of Resident 46's admission Order (Face Sheet) indicated Resident 46 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease (a brain disorder that slowly destroys memory and thinking skills, and eventually, the ability to carry out the simplest tasks), type 2 diabetes mellitus (high blood sugar), severe chronic kidney…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-16 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to notify the resident's physician (MD 1) for one of 15 sampled residents (Resident 47) for a change in condition (COC) for significant decline in physical functioning and inability to ambulate (walk) with Restorative Nursing Aide (RNA, nursing aide program that help residents to maintain their function and joint mobility) over a 4-week period by failing to: a. Assess, address and report to MD Resident 47's inability to ambulate during RNA treatment and decline in physical function from walking 85 feet with moderate assistance (about 25-50 percent [%] physical assistance) with a platform walker (PFW, a type of walking assistive device with forearm supports to provide extra support during walking) to ambulating zero feet from week of 1/18/24 to 2/12/24. b. Implement the facility's policy and procedures (P&P) titled, Change in a Resident's Condition or Status, for facility staff to notify the resident's attending physician when there was a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-16 · tag F0636 — isolatedAssess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure one of 15 sampled residents (Resident 41) Minimum Data Set (MDS - a comprehensive assessment and screening tool) was documented accurately to reflect Resident 41's current health condition of dysphagia (difficulty swallowing) and Speech Therapy (assesses and treats speech and language problems including swallowing disorders) daily three times a week for four weeks due to dysphagia. This failure had the potential to result in a delay of Resident 41 not receiving the necessary care and services. Findings: During a review of Resident 41's admission Record Face Sheet, the Face Sheet indicated, Resident 41 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of but not limited to gastro-esophageal reflux disease (when stomach content repeatedly and regular flows up into the tube connecting the mouth and stomach (esophagus) resulting in symptoms or complications like dysphagia), muscle weakness, dementia (a general term for loss of memory, language,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-16 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure one of 15 sampled residents (Resident 45) assessment entries on the Minimum Data Set (MDS- an assessment and care screening tool) related to the section in the MDS called Active Diagnoses was accurately documented to reflect Resident 45's diagnosis of schizophrenia (a mental disorder characterized by recurring episodes of psychosis that are corelated to a misconception of reality). This failure had the potential to result in a negative effect of Resident 45's plan of care and delivery of necessary care and services. Findings: During a review of Resident 45's Face Sheet, the Face Sheet indicated, Resident 45 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of but not limited to schizophrenia, dementia(a general term for loss of memory, language, problem-solving and thinking abilities that are severe enough to interfere with daily life), depression (mental state of low mood and aversion (a strong dislike) to activity), and anxiety (intense,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-16 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to reviewed and revised care plans to reflect the changes in the Restorative Nursing Aide program (RNA, nursing aide program that help residents to maintain their function and joint mobility) services for one of 15 sampled residents (Resident 15). This deficient practice had the potential to inaccurate provision of services for Resident 15. Findings: During a review of Resident 15's admission Record indicated Resident 15 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including but not limited to, contracture (loss of motion of a joint) right knee, contracture left knee, and type 2 diabetes mellitus (condition in which the body does not metabolize (process) blood sugar correctly). During a review of Resident 15's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a standardized assessment and care-screening tool) dated 12/3/23 indicated Resident 15 had severe cognitive (ability to learn, remember, understand, and make decision) impairment and required…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-16 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to place the nasal cannula (a device that gives you additional oxygen (supplemental oxygen or oxygen therapy) through the nose to deliver oxygen for one of one sampled resident (Resident 10). This failure had the potential for Resident 10 to not receive necessary respiratory care and services needed. Findings: During a review of Resident 10's admission Order, the admission Order indicated Resident 10 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including type 2 diabetes mellitus (high blood sugar), essential hypertension (high blood pressure), functional quadriplegia (a form of paralysis that affects all four limbs, plus the torso), acute and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia (happens when you don't have enough oxygen in your blood). During a review of Resident 10's Minimum Data Sheet (MDS- a comprehensive assessment and care screening tool) dated 2/03/24 indicated Resident 10 had no…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-16 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a documented justification for the continuation of an as needed (PRN) psychotropic medication (Ativan - an anti-anxiety medication) and clonazepam (anti-anxiety medication) beyond 14 days for one 1 out of the 15 sampled residents (Resident 45). This failure had the potential to result in Resident 45 receiving unnecessary medications and can lead to adverse side effects. Findings: During a review of Resident 45's admission Record Face Sheet, the Face Sheet indicated, Resident 45 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of but not limited to anxiety (intense, excessive and persistent worry and fear about everyday situations schizophrenia(a mental disorder characterized by recurring episodes of psychosis that are corelated to a misconception of reality), dementia (a general term for loss of memory, language, problem-solving and thinking abilities that are severe enough to interfere with daily life), depression(mental state of low mood…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-16 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolatedProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to: a.Label canned foods, vegetables spring rolls, ice creams, eggs, juices, meat products, and vegetables with no dates received. b.Ensure Freeze 1 was in good working condition. c.Ensure Dietary Aid 1 (DA1) change gloves and wash his hands in between touching dirty surfaces in the kitchen and Dietary Supervisor (DS) wears a glove while carrying an open lid ice cream. These failures had the potential to not identify when food was received, and when it would expire, which could affect resident's health when serve to the residents in the facility and had the potential to cause food-borne illnesses. Findings: a.During a facility kitchen tour observation on 2/13/2024 at 8:49 a.m., observed inside the kitchen freezer some broccoli, corn, carrots, brussels sprouts, vegetables spring rolls, eggs, milk, thick and easy, grape juice, tortillas, cranberry blend, tea bags, tomato catsup, Splenda, pizza sauce, mini marshmallows, multiple 6 pounds canned…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-16 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure laundry aide (LA) perform hand hygiene (hand washing using soap and water, and cleaning hands with waterless or alcohol-based hand sanitizers) after removing dirty gloves and proceeded to handling clean linens. This failure had the potential to cause contamination of clean linens and place residents of the facility at risk for infection. Findings: During an observation on 2/15/2024 at 2:38 p.m. in the facility's laundry room, the LA loaded dirty linens into the washing machine, removed his gloves and gown, put on clean gloves and gown, and went to unload clean laundry without performing hand hygiene. During an interview on 2/15/2024 at 2:50 p.m., the LA stated hand hygiene should have been performed in between handling dirty to clean laundry and when removing dirty gown and gloves. LA stated failure to perform hand hygiene may result in infections among the facility residents. During a record review of the facility's policy and procedure ( P&P) revised 12/2007, titled Handwashing/Hand Hygiene,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-10-19 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — patternEnsure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure two of three sampled residents were assisted with their ADLS ([activities of daily living] activities related to personal care) when a. Resident 2 ' s urinal (a receptable used by men to urinate) was not emptied and it was left at the resident's bedside; and b. Resident 3 call light was not answered in a timely manner. These deficient practices resulted in Resident 2 feeling uncomfortable and undignified as he had to endure the smell of an old urine in his room; and it placed Resident 3 at higher risk for moisture associated skin dermatitis (skin damage that occurs when the skin is repeatedly exposed to various bodily wastes and fluids, also known as MASD). Findings: a. During a review of Resident 2 ' s admission Record (face sheet), the face sheet indicated Resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis that included liver (organ that removes toxins from the body ' s blood supply and performs hundreds of other…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-19 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of three sampled residents (Resident 3) were provided incontinence (loss of control of bladder and bowel control)care to prevent the development of skin breakdown. These deficient practices placed Resident 3 at high risk for moisture associated skin dermatitis (skin damage that occurs when the skin is repeatedly exposed to various bodily wastes and fluids, also known as MASD). Findings: During a review of Resident 3 ' s face sheet, the face sheet indicated Resident 3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis that included diabetes mellitus (a condition where the blood sugar level was elevated), neuropathy (a condition of nerve damage leading to pain, weakness and feelings of numbness/tingling in one or more parts of the body), hypertension (a condition when the blood pressure[force it takes for heart to pump blood in the body] was abnormally high), muscle weakness and abnormalities in gait and mobility. During a review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-19 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of four sampled residents (Resident 3) was assisted to ambulate (walk) during the Restorative Nursing Assistant (RNA) Therapy Program five times a week, as ordered by the physician. This deficient practice has resulted to Resident 3 to feel worried about her health progress and recovery and had the potential to negatively affect her joint function and integrity. Findings: During a review of Resident 3 ' s admission Record (face sheet), the face sheet indicated Resident 3 was admitted at the facility on 4/28/2022 with a diagnosis that included diabetes mellitus (a condition where the blood sugar level is elevated), neuropathy (a condition of nerve damage leading to pain, weakness and feelings of numbness/tingling in one or more parts of the body), hypertension (a condition when the blood pressure is abnormally high), muscle weakness and abnormalities in gait and mobility. During a review of Resident 3 ' s Minimum Data Set (MDS), a standardized assessment and care screening tool, dated 8/5/2023, the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2025-02-28 · tag F0732 — widespreadPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staffing information posted was accurate. This failure resulted in the inability of residents and visitors to have knowledge of the facility's staffing information to ensure safe staffing ratios are implemented. Findings: During an observation on 2/25/2025 at 11:15 a.m., near Nurses Station One, the staffing information was posted and dated 2/25/2025. During a concurrent interview and record review on 2/28/2025 at 2:42 p.m., with Director of Staff Development (DSD), the facility's CMS Daily Nurse Staffing Form and the Nursing Staffing Assignment and Sign-In-Sheet, dated 2/5/2025, 2/8/2025, 2/19/2025, 2/20/2025, and 2/22/2025 were reviewed. The Nursing Staffing Assignment and Sign-In-Sheet indicated one staff call off on 2/5/2025, 2/8/2025, 2/19/2025, 2/20/2025 and 2/22/2025. The DSD stated staffing was posted daily in the front of Nurses Station One. The DSD stated she does not update or change the posted staffing. The DSD agreed that the sign in signatures on the Nursing Staffing Assignment and Sign in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · B2025-02-28 · tag F0911 — patternEnsure resident rooms hold no more than 4 residents; for new construction after November 28, 2016, rooms hold no more than 2 residents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review. The facility failed to ensure bedrooms room [ROOM NUMBER] and 34 accomodate no morethan four residents. Findings: During the initial the initial tour on 2/26/2025 at 10:00 a.m., to the facility, room [ROOM NUMBER] and 34 housed five residents per room. During a record review of Client Accommodations Analysis form, provide by the facility Maintenance Supervisor (MS) rooms [ROOM NUMBERS] occupied by five residents. During a review of Room Waiver letter dated 2/28/2025 provided by the Administrator (Admin) indicated, all residents and caregivers have ample space in mobility with walkers and wheelchairs. Residents can get in and out of their rooms with ease and facility staff are able to give care of administering treatment or medications to the residents inside the room. The floor size of room [ROOM NUMBER] was 500.73 sq. ft (100.14 sq. ft per bed), and room [ROOM NUMBER] was 534.42 sq. ft (106.88 sq. ft per bed). This exceeds the required 80 sq. ft per bed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2025-02-28 · tag F0912 — patternProvide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review. The facility failed to ensure 8 of 17 residents rooms met the 80 square feet (sq. ft.-unit of measurement) per residents in multiple resident rooms. Rooms 20, 21, 22, 23, 25, 26,27 and 32. This failure had the potential to result in an inadequate provision of safe nursing care, and privacy for the residents. Findings: During the initial the initial tour on 2/26/2025 at 10:00 a.m., to the facility, Rooms 20, 21,22, 23, 25, 26, 27, and 32 rooms did not meet the requirement of 80 sq. ft. per residents. During a record review of Client Accommodations Analysis form, provide by the facility Maintenance Supervisor (MS) Rooms 20, 21, 22, 23, 25, 26, 27 and 32 rooms did not meet the requirement of 80 sq.ft per residents. During a review of Room Waiver letter dated 2/28/2025 provided by the Administrator (Admin) indicated, all residents and caregivers have ample space in mobility with walkers and wheelchairs. Residents can get in and out of their rooms with ease and facility staff are able to give care of administering treatment or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2024-02-16 · tag F0912 — patternProvide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure 8 of 17 residents rooms met the 80 square feet (sq. ft.) per residents in multiple resident rooms. Rooms 20, 21, 22, 23, 25, 26, 27, and 32 housed four residents per room and room [ROOM NUMBER] and 34 housed five residents per room. Findings: During the initial tour on 2/13 /2024 at 9:10 a.m.to the facility, Rooms 20, 21, 22, 23, 25, 26, 27, and 32 rooms did not meet the requirement of 80 sq. ft. per residents and rooms [ROOM NUMBERS] housed five residents per room. During a record review of Client Accommodations Analysis form, provided by the facility Maintenance Supervisor (MS) Rooms 20, 21, 22, 23, 25, 26, 27, and 32 occupied by four residents each, ranged in total square feet measurement between 73.8 square feet to 76.5 square feet per resident and rooms [ROOM NUMBERS] occupied by five residents ranged in total square feet measurement between 500.73 square feet for rooms [ROOM NUMBERS].42 square feet for Rooms 34. During a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$109,708 in federal fines across 2 penalties. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.
- $17,627 — penalty dated 2025-08-31
- $92,081 — penalty dated 2024-02-16
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-03-19 for 30 days
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| VALDOMAR, CELIA | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE; CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER | 100% | since 08/07/1980 |
| BRYDON, JOSEPHINE | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 01/01/2012 |
| GLENWRIGHT, DEBORAH | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 01/01/2012 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 8 rows in the source record cover these 3 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 75% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $701K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in CA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 055070. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-03-27, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.