White Point Care Center
1430 West 6th Street, San Pedro, CA 90732 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 99 certified beds · (310) 832-6431 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Jan 2025
- it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565)
- it has 1 actual-harm citation
- a high number of inspection citations overall (62) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $6,351 in federal fines (most recent 2023-12-11)
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 1 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 4 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 6.4% | 10.2% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 2.7% | 4.0% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 2.7% | 0.8% | 0.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 1.5% | 1.2% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 1.0% | 7.3% | 6.5% | better |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.4% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 0.3% | 1.6% | 3.3% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 10.8% | 9.8% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 10.2% | 13.7% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 98.2% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 8.7% | 4.3% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 11.1% | 10.2% | 21.2% | typical for the state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 9.1% | 12.0% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 1.3% | 1.5% | 1.4% | typical |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 99.0% | 93.2% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 25.8% | 23.0% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 1.9% | 11.2% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.45 | 2.25 | 1.67 | better |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.30 | 1.57 | 1.80 | better |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
51.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 50 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 41.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 31 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.20 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 23% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 19% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 51.8%CMS range 38.1–62.0 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.9%CMS range 7.6–16.9 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 41.9% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 38.7% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 38.7% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 6.8%CMS range 3.8–12.1 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.96 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 99 beds and averages 94.3 residents a day — about 95% occupied, or roughly 5 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.77 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.42 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.38 to 0.19 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 53% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
62 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 51 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-05-09 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident, who had a Stage 4 pressure ulcer (wound that penetrate all layers of skin exposing muscles, tendons [tissue that unites a muscle with a bone] cartilage {tissue that lines a joints}, and bones caused by prolonged pressure on the skin) to left buttock (the back of a hip that forms one of the fleshy parts on which a person sits), did not experience unnecessary pain and suffering during pressure ulcer treatment and repositioning for one of one sampled resident (Resident 1). The facility failed to: 1. Ensure the Treatment Nurse (TN 1) stopped providing Resident 1 with left buttock pressure ulcer treatment when Resident 1 had facial grimacing (a facial expression where the mouth and face are twisted, often to indicate disgust, disapproval, or pain) and was moaning during treatment. 2. Ensure Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 4 medicated Resident 1 with Tylenol (pain medication) 500 milligrams (mg-unit of measurement) one hour…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fdisputed · IDR2026-06-25 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespreadHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a Registered Nurse (RN) was designated to serve as the Director of Nursing (DON) on a full-time basis.This deficient practice had the potential to negatively affect all 78 residents in the facility by impacting the overall clinical oversight, management, and quality of nursing care provided.Findings:During a review of the Facility Assessment (a facility-wide evaluation conducted and documented to indicate the resources, and staffing the facility needs to provide the necessary care for their residents daily) dated 5/29/26, the facility assessment indicated, there should be a DON full time five days (40 hours) a week. The facility assessment indicated, there were two Registered Nurse Supervisors (RNS).During a review of the DON's Terminated w2, dated 6/4/26, the terminated w2 indicated, the last day of employment for the DON was 6/4/26.During an interview on 6/24/26 at 9:34 a.m. with the Director of Staff Development (DSD), the DSD stated the DON quit on 6/4/26. The DSD stated the DON was responsible for overseeing the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-06-25 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to store food in a safe and sanitary manner. The facility had (78) residents receiving oral diet. The facility failed to:1.Ensure prepared cups of orange juice, apple juice and cranberry juice were stored at the required 40 degrees Fahrenheit (F- unit of measure) while the breakfast was being plated (scooped on plates) prior to serving it to the residents.2.Ensure a container of ice cream had a use-by date (the final day a product is guaranteed to be at top quality for consumption ) after it was opened. This failure had the potential to place residents at risk for developing food borne illnesses (any illness resulting from eating contaminated/spoiled foods) and reduce the quality of food served in the facility.Findings:1.During an observation on 6/23/26 at 6:44 a.m. in the kitchen, the meal trays were observed to be set up with different types of juices. The temperature of the apple juice, cranberry juice and orange juice was observed to be 69.9 degrees Fahrenheit.During an interview on 6/25/26 at 8:44 a.m. with the cook, the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-06-25 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure infection control measures were implemented for three of six sampled residents (Residents 6, 68 and 99). The facility failed to ensure:Personal protective equipment (PPE- clothing and equipment that is worn or used to provide protection against hazardous substances and/or environments) for Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP- infection control intervention using gown and gloves during high contact resident care activities designed to reduce the transmission of multi-drug-resistant organisms {microorganisms, predominantly bacteria, that are resistant to one or more classes of antimicrobial agents) was disposed of correctly in a closed container after providing care to Resident 68.2. Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 4 wore the required personal PPE before entering and washed her hands with soap and water after exiting Resident 6's room. Resident 6 was in contact precautions (are set of safety measures used when a resident has a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-25 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure one of one sampled resident (Resident 21), had a call light within reach. This failure had the potential to result in Resident 21 not being able to call for assistance.Findings:During a review of Resident 21 admission Record (Face Sheet-front page of the chart that contains a summary of basic information about the resident), the Face Sheet indicated Resident 21 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of but not limited to spinal stenosis (narrowing of spaces within the spine), muscle weakness, dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities) and difficulty walking.During a review of Resident 21's Physician Progress Note, dated 5/5/2025, the Physician Progress Note indicated Resident 21 did not have the capacity to understand and make decisions. During a review of Resident 21's Care Plan titled, Alteration In Physical Functioning, date revised 10/7/2025,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-25 · tag F0582 — isolatedGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide Skilled Nursing Facility Advanced Beneficiary Notice of Non-coverage (SNF ABN) for two of three sampled residents (Resident 86 and Resident 92).This failure had the potential to prevent residents or their representatives from making informed decisions about whether to receive services that may require out-of-pocket payment.Findings: During a concurrent interview and record review on 6/24/2026 at 1:40 p.m. with the Business Office Manager (BOM), the BOM stated that Resident 86's last covered day for Medicare Part A was 4/16/2026 and Resident 92's was 6/11/2026. The BOM stated she failed to provide SNF ABNs in writing to Residents 86 and 92 or their representatives thus failing to notify them of potential financial liability. The BOM stated she was responsible for notifying residents or their representatives of changes in Medicare to inform them when coverage was ending and possible share of cost. The BOM stated residents or their representatives…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-25 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure one of one sampled residents (Resident 92)'s assessment entries on the Minimum Data Set (MDS- a resident assessment tool) related to hearing status and use of hearing aids was accurately documented to reflect the resident's ability to hear. This failure had the potential to negatively affect Resident 92's's plan of care and delivery of necessary care and services.Findings:During a review of Resident 92's admission Record (Face Sheet- front page of the chart that contains a summary of basic information about the resident), the Face Sheet indicated Resident 92 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of but not limited to encephalopathy (damage or disease that affects the brain), dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities), anxiety (emotion characterized by feelings of tension, worried thoughts ), and generalized muscle weakness.During a review of Resident 92's Order Summary, dated 3/20/2026, the Order Summary…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-25 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure one of one sampled resident (Resident 92) had a care plan initiated and implemented for hearing loss.This failure to provide Resident 92 with her hearing aids had the potential to negatively affect Resident 92's ability to communicate needs, participate in care and maintain psychosocial well-being.Findings:During a review of Resident 92's admission Record (Face Sheet- front page of the chart that contains a summary of basic information about the resident), the Face Sheet indicated Resident 92 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of but not limited to encephalopathy (damage or disease that affects the brain), dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities), anxiety (emotion characterized by feelings of tension, worried thoughts ), and generalized muscle weakness.During a review of Resident 92's Order Summary, dated 3/20/2026, the Order Summary indicated Resident 92 may have a ENT (ear, nose and throat) and an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-25 · tag F0685 — isolatedAssist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide one of one sampled resident (Resident 92) with her hearing aids (a device worn in or behind the ear designed to amplify sound for individuals who have difficulty hearing) stored in the Social Service Director's (SSD) file cabinet.This failure resulted in Resident 92 not being able to communicate effectively when spoken too.Findings:During a review of Resident 92's admission Record (Face Sheet- front page of the chart that contains a summary of basic information about the resident), the Face Sheet indicated Resident 92 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of but not limited to encephalopathy (damage or disease that affects the brain), dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities), anxiety (emotion characterized by feelings of tension, worried thoughts ), and generalized muscle weakness.During a review of Resident 92's Order Summary, dated 3/20/2026, the Order Summary indicated Resident 92 may have a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-25 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolatedEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility failed to ensure a skills competency was done upon hire for the licensed staff. This failure had the potential to place residents at risk by allowing licensed staff to perform clinical tasks without confirmation they were competent to do so placing the residents at risk for staff providing care incorrectly or inconsistently and delayed recognition of changes in condition. Findings:During a concurrent interview and record review on 6/25/26 at 9:42 a.m. with the Director of Staff Development (DSD) , the Assistant Director of Nurses (ADON)'s employee file was reviewed, The DSD stated nurse competencies are done upon hire and annually thereafter. The DSD stated the ADON was hired on 12/1/25. The DSD stated competencies were not done for the ADON upon hire. The DSD stated skills competencies are done to ensure the staff are knowledgeable and competent in the job they were hired to do. The DSD stated there was a possibility for the residents to experience a delay in care if the nurse is not competent in providing the care needed.During an interview on 6/25/25 at 11:37 a.m.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-25 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure two of five sampled residents (Resident 37 and Resident 53) were free of unnecessary medication by failing to:1.Ensure Resident 37 who was receiving lorazepam (medication used to treat anxiety) was used without clinical justification, adequate monitoring and documentation.2.Ensure Resident 53 who was receiving lorazepam for anxiety and inability to sleep had documented behavior and sleep monitoring.This failure had the potential to place Resident 37 and Resident 53 at risk for unnecessary medication and adverse effects (unwanted and harmful result that can occur after taking a medication) associated with the prescribed medications. Findings: 1.During a review of Resident 37's physician's order dated 5/22/26 and 6/9/26, the physician order indicated lorazepam to be given every 12 hours as needed for anxiety. During a review of Resident 37's physician order dated 5/30/26, physician order indicated monitoring episodes of anxiety every shift for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 51 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-25 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure residents were free of a medication error rate of 5% or greater. During a medication administration pass on 6/23/26, one licensed nurse failed to administer three prescribed medications Rena Vite (supplement), vitamin c (supplement) and zinc sulfate (supplement) to Resident (68).This resulted in a 10.34% medication error rate, based on three medication errors observed out of 29 medication opportunities.Findings:During an observation on 6/23/26 at 8:45 a.m. in Resident 68's room with licensed vocational Nurse 3, (LVN 3) was observed administering Resident 68 her 9:00 a.m. medications. LVN 3 was observed to not give Resident 68's prescribed Rena Vite, vitamin c and zinc sulfate during Resident 68's 9:00 a.m. medication administration pass.During a review of Resident 68's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a federally mandated resident assessment tool) dated 5/19/26, the MDS indicated, Resident 68's cognition (memory) was intact. The MDS…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-25 · tag F0790 — failed to provide dental care — isolatedProvide routine and 24-hour emergency dental care for each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow up necessary dental services for one of four sampled residents (Residen16). This failure put Resident 16 at risk for development of tooth decay and weight loss. Findings: During a review of Resident 16's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 16 was admitted on [DATE] to the facility with diagnoses including cardiomegaly(enlarged heart), enthesopathy( any disease or injury that affects where the tendons and ligaments connect in the bones), hypertension(HTN- high blood pressure), and congestive heart failure(CHF-a heart disorder which causes the heart to not pump the blood efficiently, sometimes resulting in leg swelling).During a review of Resident 16's Minimum Data Set (MDS- a resident assessment tool) dated 4/8/2026, the MDS indicated Resident 16 had moderately impaired cognitive (ability to make decisions of daily living) skills and required supervision or touching assistance (helper provides verbal cues and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-25 · tag F0847 — isolatedInform resident or representatives choice to enter into binding arbitration agreement and right to refuse.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the terms and condition of the arbitration agreement (legally binding contract in which parties agree to resolve any future or current disputes out of court) was clearly explained to the resident/ resident representative for one of three sampled residents (Resident 90).This failure had the potential to result in Resident 90 unknowingly giving up the right to resolve any disputes with the facility through a court of law before a jury.Findings:During a review of Resident 90's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the facility initially admitted Resident 90 on 9/2/2024 and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including Parkinson's disease(a progressive disease of the nervous system marked by tremor, muscular rigidity, and slow, imprecise movements), unspecified dementia(a progressive state of decline in mental abilities), anxiety disorder and diabetes mellitus (DM- a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-25 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — isolatedEnsure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure all Certified Nursing Aides (CNA's) received the mandatory five-hour annual dementia management training.This deficient practice had the potential to effect all residents residing in the facility specifically those with dementia by placing them at risk for receiving care from staff who lack current, mandatory competency in managing behavioral expressions and cognitive (memory) decline.Findings:During a concurrent interview and record review on 6/25/26 at 9:42 a.m. with the Director of Staff Development (DSD), CNA trainings and the annual (2026) mandatory in service calendar were reviewed. The DSD stated staff are to be provided with five hours of dementia training annually. The DSD stated one hour of dementia training was provided within the last year. The DSD stated dementia training was important, to ensure staff are equipped with the knowledge and skills needed to take care of residents with cognitive concerns. The DSD stated there was a potential for the residents to receive poor care if the staff could not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-16 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — isolatedHonor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure two out of two resident council meetings held on 10/15/2025 and 12/17/2025, where concerns regarding timely toileting assistance on were mentioned on 10/15/2025 and delayed call light response on 12/17/2025, were documented on the Resident Council Response Form (document used by the facility to formally record and respond to concerns). This deficient practice had the potential in delaying tracking issues mentioned during the resident council meetings, resolving resident concerns, and notifying the Quality Assurance/Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement ([QA/QAPI] a data driven proactive approach to improvement used to ensure services are meeting quality standards) committee in a timely manner to address ongoing problems. Findings: During a review of the facility's Resident Council Minutes, dated 10/15/2026, the minutes indicated the residents' concerns included the nurses should regularly check on residents who use the restroom often at least every two hours.During a review of the facility's Resident Council…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-10-30 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide necessary care and services for one (1) of two (2) sampled residents (Resident 4). The facility failed to: 1.Reassess Resident 4 after a low blood pressure reading of 90/42 millimeter of mercury (mm/Hg unit of pressure) on 10/15/2025 at 8:29 a.m. and failing to recheck vital signs (measure the basic functions of the body which include temperature, blood pressure, pulse and respiratory [breathing] rate) prior to sending the resident to dialysis at approximately 11 a.m., on 10/15/2025.2.Notify the physician of a foul-smelling odor observed from Resident 4's right Achilles wound during wound care treatment on 10/14/2025.These failures had the potential to delay necessary care and treatment and increased the risk of hospitalization for Resident 4.Findings:During a review of Resident 4's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 4 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-30 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a safe environment and provide adequate supervision to prevent accident for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1). The facility failed to:1.Supervise Resident 1 and Resident 2 on 10/11/2025 at approximately 7:00 p.m., while they were smoking on the patio according to Resident 1 and 2's Smoking Assessment Forms.2.Secure the door leading to the smoking patio after the last scheduled smoking time at 6 p.m.3.Ensure Certified Nursing Assistants (CNA) 2 redirect Resident 2 to the resident's room instead of leaving Resident 2 unattended in the smoking patio on 10/11/2025. 4.Ensure CNA 1 was aware of Resident 1's whereabout on 10/11/2025 at 7 p.m.These failures resulted in Resident 2 throwing a plastic coffee mug at the right side of Resident 1's head. Resident 1 sustained a bump on the right side of the head and complained of a headache rated of 3 out of 10 on a 0 to 10 numeric pain scale (0 = no pain, 1 to 3 = mild pain, 4 to 6 = moderate pain…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-09-22 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to report a COVID - 19 (a potentially severe illness caused by a coronavirus and characterized by fever, cough, and shortness of breath) outbreak to the California Department of Public Health (CDPH) when three residents (Residents 6, 7, and 8) tested positive for COVID-19 indicative of a facility outbreak.Findings:a. During a review of Resident 6's admission Record (Face Sheet), the Face Sheet indicated Resident 6 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including arthrogryposis multiplex congenita (a rare, non-progressive condition present at birth, characterized by multiple, stiff, contracted joints (contractures) and muscle weakness).During a review of Resident 6's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a resident assessment tool) dated 7/7/2025, the MDS indicated Resident 6's cognition (the mental action or process of acquiring knowledge and understanding through thought, experience, and the senses) was intact and required substantial/maximal assistance…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-09 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to: 1. Ensure administration of metoprolol succinate (a medication used to treat hypertension [high blood pressure] and heart conditions) extended release (ER) within 60 minutes of its scheduled time as per facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Medication Administration - General Guidelines, dated 05/2022, affecting one of seven sampled residents during medication administration (Resident 27). 2. Clarify and discontinue Resident 27's duplicate orders for Voltaren ([generic name - diclofenac] a medication used topically to treat osteoarthritis [pain and inflammation of joints]) topical gel, affecting one of seven sampled residents during medication administration (Resident 27). 3. Maintain accurate medication administration records as per facility's P&P titled, Medication Administration - General Guidelines, dated 05/2022, affecting one of seven sampled residents during medication administration (Resident 27). 4. Ensure availability…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-09 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — patternEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain a medication error rate of less than 5% (percent) during medication pass for two of seven sampled residents (Residents 27 and 65). The facility failed to: a. Administer Resident 27's metoprolol succinate (a medication used to treat hypertension [high blood pressure] and heart conditions) extended release (ER) within 60 minutes of its scheduled time as per facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Medication Administration - General Guidelines, dated 05/2022, and 2.Administer Resident 27's timolol ophthalmic solution (a medication used to treat glaucoma [progressive eye disease that damages optic nerve potentially leading to vision loss and blindness] and high eye pressure]), Alphagan P ophthalmic solution ([generic name - brimonidine] a medication used to treat glaucoma and high eye pressure), dorzolamide hydrochloride ophthalmic solution (a medication used to treat glaucoma and high eye pressure) and artificial tears eye…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-09 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to: 1. Ensure the dose on Resident 59's Lantus Solostar's ([generic name - insulin glargine] a type of insulin [a hormone that removes excess sugar from the blood, can be produced by the body or given artificially via medication] used to treat high blood sugar) pharmacy label matched with the physician order in electronic medical health record (eMHR), and was labeled with an open date in accordance with manufacturer specifications, and as per facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Medication Labeling and Storage, dated 2/2023, affecting one of seven sampled residents during medication administration. 2. Ensure removal of Resident 25's discontinued Humalog ([generic name - insulin lispro] a type of insulin used to treat high blood sugar) vial from Station 1 Medication Room Refrigerator, affecting one of one medication rooms inspected (Station 1 Medication Room). 3. Ensure Resident 27's medications including dorzolamide (a medication…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-05-09 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure three of three sampled residents (Resident 82, Resident 48, and Resident 41) was served food that was appetizing, not bland and tasteless. This failure had the potential for Resident 82, Resident 48, and Resident 41) to lose weight. Findings: During a review of Resident 82's admission Record (Face Sheet), the Face Sheet indicated Resident 82 was admitted to facility on 12/28/2024 with diagnoses of diabetes mellitus (DM-a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound healing), hypertension(HTN-high blood pressure) and hyperlipidemia(elevated levels of cholesterol). During a review of Resident 82's Minimum Data Set (MDS-), dated 1/6/2025, the MDS indicated, Resident 82 had the ability to understand others. The MDS indicated Resident 82 had the ability to express ideas and wants. During a review of Resident 82's Physician Orders, dated 12/28/2024, the Physician Orders indicated, Resident 82 had an order for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-05-09 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — patternSet up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility's Quality Assessment and Assurance (QAA committees established for the purpose of improving the safety and quality of health services) and Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI- approach to maintain and improve safety and quality in nursing homes) committee failed to implement corrective action to the potential systemic problems identified: 1.Maintain a system to ensure call lights are answered timely. 2.Maintain a system to ensure activities of daily living are implemented. 3.Maintain a system to ensure accurate pharmaceutical services and procedures. 4.Maintain a system to ensure accurate pharmaceutical services and procedures. 5.Maintain a system free of significant medication error. 6.Maintain a system to ensure the storage and labeling of biological and medications. 7.Maintain a system to ensure food is stored in a sanitary manor. 8.Maintain clinical records in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices. These deficient practices had the potential to result in the residents residing in the facility…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-09 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure one of one sampled resident (Resident 82) Minimum Data Set (MDS - a resident assessment tool) section H was coded accurately to reflect Resident 82 was not incontinent (experiencing the involuntary loss of urine or stool). This failure resulted in Resident 82's MDS being coded incorrectly and had the potential to result in a loss of dignity for Resident 82. Findings: During a review of Resident 82's admission Record (Face Sheet), the Face Sheet indicated Resident 82 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of but not limited to diabetes mellitus(DM-a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound healing), myocardial infarction(MI-heart attack), broken left arm and hypertension(HTN-high blood pressure). During a review of Resident 82's Interdisciplinary Team (a group of professional from different disciplines or fields who work together towards a common goal)-Plan of Care Meeting Notes, dated 1/3/2025, the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-09 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for one of three sampled residents (Resident 78) by failing to: 1.Develop a comprehensive person-centered care plan to address Resident 78's toe infection. This failure had the potential to negatively affect the delivery of care and services to Resident 78. Findings: During a review of Resident 78's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 78 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including hypertension (HTN- high blood pressure) and Diabetes Mellitus (DM- a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound healing). During a review of Resident 78's Minimum Data Set (MDS- a resident assessment tool) dated 2/28/2025, the MDS indicated Resident 78's cognition (ability to think, understand, learn, and remember) was severely impaired and required supervision with toileting and dressing. During a review of Resident 78's Order Summary…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-09 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure Resident 9's Ciprodex otic (ear) ([generic name - ciprofloxacin and dexamethasone] a medication used to treat ear infection and inflammation) suspension was administered per professional standards of practice and as per facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Specific Medication Administration Procedures - Ear Drop Administration, dated 05/2022, for one of seven sampled residents during medication administration (Resident 9). This failure had the potential to result in Resident 9's discomfort and untreated ear infection. Findings: During a review of Resident 9's admission Record (a document containing demographic and diagnostic information), dated 5/8/2025, the admission Record indicated Resident 9 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM-a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound healing) with diabetic…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-09 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide pressure ulcer treatment for left buttock Stage 4 pressure ulcer (wound that penetrate all layers of skin exposing muscles, tendons [tissue that unites a muscle with a bone] cartilage {tissue that lines a joint}, and bones caused by prolonged pressure on the skin) on 5/8/2025, as indicated in the resident's physician orders for one of one sampled residents (Resident 1) . This deficiency had the potential for Resident 1's left buttock Stage 4 pressure ulcer to worsen, to develop new pressure injury, and had the potential to develop infection. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 1 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including anoxic brain injury (occurs when the brain receives no oxygen at all and causes brain damage), functional quadriplegia (a severe medical condition characterized by the partial or total loss…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-09 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from significant medication errors for one (Resident 27) of seven sampled residents during medication administration. The facility failed to: 1. Administer Resident 27's metoprolol succinate (a medication used to treat hypertension [high blood pressure] and heart conditions) extended release (ER) within 60 minutes of its scheduled time of administration as per facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Medication Administration - General Guidelines, dated 05/2022. This deficient practice failed to provide medication in accordance with the physician's orders or professional standards of practice and had the potential to result in hypertension, stroke (loss of blood flow to a part of the brain) and hospitalization for Resident 27. Findings: During a review of Resident 27's admission Record (a document containing demographic and diagnostic information), dated 5/8/2025, the admission record indicated, Resident 27…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-09 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolatedEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record the facility failed to ensure one of one sampled resident (Resident 85), food likes, and cultural preferences were met and honored. This failure resulted in Resident 85's not receiving food items from Resident 85's choice and preference. Findings: During a review of Resident 85's admission Record (Face Sheet), the Face Sheet indicated Resident 85 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of but not limited to Parkinson's disease (a progressive disease of the nervous system marked by tremor, muscular rigidity, and slow, imprecise movements), low back pain, muscle weakness and dementia(a progressive state of decline in mental abilities). During a review of Resident 85's History and Physical (H&P), dated 4/3/2025, the H&P indicated, Resident 85 did not have the capacity to make decisions. The H&P indicated Resident 85 was alert to his name only. During a review of Resident 85's Minimum Data Set (MDS-), dated 3/31/2025, the MDS indicated Resident 85 usually had the ability…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-09 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure licensed staff did not falsify medication administration record ([MAR] a record of all medications administered to a resident) entries as administered for medications listed below that were not available in facility, not administered or not observed as self-administered for one of seven sampled residents (Resident 27). For Resident 27, the facility nurses documented on the MAR for timolol ophthalmic solution (a medication used to treat glaucoma [progressive eye disease that damages optic nerve potentially leading to vision loss and blindness] and high eye pressure]), Alphagan P ophthalmic solution ([generic name - brimonidine] a medication used to treat glaucoma and high eye pressure), dorzolamide hydrochloride ophthalmic solution (a medication used to treat glaucoma and high eye pressure) and artificial tears eye solution (eye drops used to treat dry eyes) as administered for different scheduled times. This deficient practice of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-09 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement and maintain infection control procedures when Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 3 failed to perform hand hygiene between resident's care and prior to entering and exiting the resident room. This deficient practice had the potential to result in cross contamination (physical movement or transfer of harmful bacteria from one person, object, or place to another) and spread of diseases and infection to the facility staff, residents, and visitors. Findings: During an observation on 5/8/2025 at 11:04 a.m., LVN 3 was observed not performing hand hygiene between resident care or when entering and exiting a resident room. During an interview on 5/8/2025 at 11:12 a.m., LVN 3 stated she should have performed hand hygiene to prevent the spread of germs and infection. During an interview on 5/9/2025 at 1:38 p.m., with the Director of Nursing (DON), the DON stated the number one way to prevent the spread of infection was through hand hygiene. The DON stated the staff should perform hand hygiene between resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-09 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — isolatedImplement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement their protocol for Antibiotic Stewardship (refers to a set of commitments actions designed to optimize the treatments of infections while reducing the adverse events associated with antibiotic use) for one of three sampled residents (Resident 78) by prescribing an antibiotic medication (a substance used to kill bacteria and treat infections) without meeting the criteria, before being treated for toe cellulitis (a skin infection that causes swelling and redness). This failure had the potential for Resident 78 to develop antibiotic resistance (not effective to treat infection) from inappropriate antibiotic use. Findings: During a review of Resident 78's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 78 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including hypertension (HTN- high blood pressure) and diabetes mellitus (DM- a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound healing). During a review…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-09 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolatedMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure one of the sampled residents (Resident 82) was provided with a home-like environment, Resident 82 had a large hole in his sliding screen door. This failure had the potential to have unwanted pest entering Resident 82's room . Findings: During a review of Resident 82's admission Record (Face Sheet), the admission Record indicated Resident 82 was admitted to facility on 12/28/2024 with diagnoses of diabetes mellitus (DM-a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound healing), hypertension(HTN-high blood pressure) and hyperlipidemia (elevated levels of cholesterol). During a review of Resident 82's Minimum Data Set (MDS-), dated 1/6/2025, the MDS indicated Resident 82 had the ability to understand others. The MDS indicated Resident 82 had the ability to express ideas and wants. During a concurrent observation and interview on 5/6/2025 at 2:06 PM with Resident 82, Resident 82 pointed to his screen door and stated the hole has been there for four months. Resident 82 stated the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-23 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents room temperature was comfortable and safe temperatures (71-81 degrees Fahrenheit [°F unit of measurement that is used to measure temperature ]) for one of three sampled residents. This failure had the potential to increase the risk of adverse health effects from an uncomfortable environment for the residents (Resident 3). Findings: During a review of Resident 3 ' s admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including hypertension (HTN- high blood pressure) and immunodeficiency (decreased ability of the body to fight infections and other diseases). During a review of Resident 3 ' s Minimum Data Set (MDS- resident assessment tool dated 1/3/2025, the MDS indicated Resident 3 was cognitively intact (a person ' s mental abilities, like thinking, remembering, and reasoning, are fully functional and not significantly impaired). The MDS indicated Resident 3 required…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-23 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to protect the residents ' right to be free from physical abuse for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) when Resident 2 slapped and punched Resident 1 in the face repeatedly on 1/17/2025. The facility failed to: 1. Developed a plan of care for Resident 2 who verbalized to staff that he does not want to have roommates, does not like noise and preferred to be alone in his room when Resident 1 was transferred to Resident 2 ' s room (unknown date). 2. The facility failed to follow policy and procedures titled Identifying Types of Abuse, revised 9/2022, which indicated, Abuse of any kind against residents is strictly prohibited. These failures resulted in Resident 2 slapped and punched Resident 1 in the face repeatedly on 1/17/2025. Resident 1 sustained scattered facial redness on bilateral (both) cheeks, forehead, and nose with complained of pain level three out of 10 on a pain rating scale from zero to ten (a numeric pain scale with zero represents…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-12 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement residents' care plan interventions for one of three sampled residents (Residents 1), who had wandering (walking around slowly in a relaxed way or without any clear purpose or direction) behavior to monitor Resident 1's whereabouts. This failure resulted in Resident 1 entering her previous room after Resident 1 had alleged physical altercation (a dispute between individuals in which one or more persons sustain bodily injury arising out of the dispute) with her previous roommate. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Record, the admission Record indicated, Resident 1 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and last re-admission was 4/16/2024 with diagnoses including dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities), major depressive disorder (a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest), and repeated falls. During a review of Resident 1's History and Physical…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-01 · tag F0573 — isolatedLet each resident or the resident's legal representative access or purchase copies of all the resident's records.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a copy of medical records upon written request from an authorized legal representative ([LR] a person who is legally authorized to act on behalf of another) for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) within two working days per the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Release of Information. This deficient practice violated Resident 1 and the LR's rights to obtain a copy of the resident's medical record. Findings: During a review of Resident 1 ' s admission Record (Face Sheet), the face sheet indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including severe sepsis (a life-threatening condition that occurs when an infection causes organ damage) with septic shock (a life-threatening condition that occurs when a body-wide infection causes dangerously low blood pressure and organ failure), and vascular dementia (a chronic condition that affects the brain ' s ability to think, remember, and behave due to poor…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-16 · tag F0573 — isolatedLet each resident or the resident's legal representative access or purchase copies of all the resident's records.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a copy of medical records upon written request from an authorized legal representative ([LR] a person who is legally authorized to act on behalf of another) for one of three sampled residents (Resident 4) within two working days per the facility's policy and procedure (P/P) titled, Release of Information. This deficient practice violated Resident 4 and the LR's rights to obtain a copy of the resident's medical record. Findings: During a review of Resident 4's admission Record (Face Sheet), the Face Sheet indicated Resident 4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including severe sepsis (a life-threatening condition which occurs when an infection [germ] causes organ damage) with septic shock (a life-threatening condition which occurs when a body-wide infection causes dangerously low blood pressure and organ failure), acute pyelonephritis (a bacterial infection of the kidneys which can be life-threatening and cause organ damage),…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-16 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure pressure sores (a wound caused by localized area of damaged skin or tissue that can occur when prolonged pressure is applied to an area of the body) were measured and appropriate interventions were provided for a resident (Resident 1) who was a high risk for skin break down for one out of three residents. These deficient practices had the potential to cause complications of Resident 1 ' s current wounds and had the potential for Resident 1 to sustain new wounds. Findings: During a review of Resident 1 ' s admission Record (Face Sheet), the Face Sheet indicated Resident 1 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including diabetes mellitus (DM) type 2 [a chronic condition characterized by elevated levels of blood glucose (or blood sugar) in a bloodstream], hemiplegia (paralysis or weakness of one side of the body) and hemiparesis (weakness or inability to move one side…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-06 · tag F0553 — failed to let residents help plan their care — isolatedAllow resident to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to include the resident representative in the plan of care for one of three residents (Resident 1) when Resident 1 ' s representative was not informed of Resident 1 ' s change of condition which resulted in Resident 1 being late to his appointment. This deficient practice had the potential to violate Resident 1's right to have their representative participate in his care. Findings: During a review of Resident 1 ' s admission Record (Face Sheet), the Face Sheet indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnoses including malignant neoplasm of the bone and articular cartilage (bone cancer) and congestive heart failure (a serious condition that occurs when the heart can't pump enough blood to meet the body's needs). During a review of Resident 1 ' s History and Physical (H&P) dated 8/31/2024, the H &P indicated Resident 1 was awake and alert. During a review of Resident 1 ' s Nursing Progress Note dated 9/4/2024, the Nursing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-06 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure pain management was provided according to professional standards of practice for one of three residents (Resident 1). The facility failed to: 1. Document the administration of seven doses of Norco [a narcotic (a drug that works in the brain to dull the sense of pain) to relieve moderate to severe pain] from 9/1/2024 through 9/3/2024 on Resident 1 ' s administration record. 2. Assess and document Resident 1 ' s pain using the pain rating scale (a subjective [personal view] measure in which individuals rate their pain on an 11-point scale; 0 = no pain, 1-3 = mild pain, 4-6 =moderate pain, 7 to 9 = severe pain, and 10 = worst possible pain). 3. Assess and document the effectiveness of Norco after administration according to the facility ' s policy and procedure (P/P) titled Pain Assessment and Management. This deficient practice had the potential to result in unrecognized unrelieved pain for Resident 1 and placed Resident 1 at risk to suffer…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-04 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one out of three sampled residents, (Resident 3) had floor mats (mat used to reduce fall related trauma if a resident gets out of bed, loses balance, and falls to the floor) at the bedside as indicated in Resident 3's care plan This deficient practice had the potential to result in injury from a fall if Resident 3 suffers a fall by the bed. Findings: During a review of Resident 3's admission record, dated 6/4/2024, the record indicated Resident 3 was admitted on [DATE] with a diagnosis including Alzheimer's disease (a brain disorder that slowly destroys memory and thinking skills and eventually the ability to carry out the simplest tasks) and unspecified psychosis (a severe mental disorder in which a person loses the ability to recognize reality or relate to others), unilateral (one side) primary osteoarthritis (happens knee joint breaks down, enabling the bones to rub together), muscle weakness, and unspecified abnormalities of gait and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-24 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop an individualized care plan and conduct an interdisciplinary (group of professionals from different disciplines) team conference, involving the family member 1 (FM 1), to address one out of nine sampled resident's (Resident 1) refusal of examination and treatment by the podiatrist (foot specialist) and optometrist (health professional that involves examining eyes). This deficient practice resulted in a delay of needed services and had the potential to contribute to further medical problems and contribute to a negative physical wellbeing. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Record, dated 5/23/2024, the admission Record indicated Resident 1 was originally admitted on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE] with a diagnosis including dementia (impaired ability to remember, think, or make decisions that interferes with doing everyday activities) with agitation, bipolar disorder (a serious mental illness that causes extreme mood swings that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-24 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to place floor mats (mats used to reduce fall?related trauma if a patient gets up from bed, loses balance, and falls to the floor) on both sides of one out of nine sampled resident's (Resident 1), bed as ordered by the physician and as indicated in the care plan. This deficient practice had the potential to result in severe injury if Resident 1 fell onto the floor from the bed. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Record, dated 5/23/2024, the admission Record indicated Resident 1 was originally admitted on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE] with a diagnosis including dementia (impaired ability to remember, think, or make decisions that interferes with doing everyday activities) with agitation, bipolar disorder (a serious mental illness that causes extreme mood swings that include emotional highs [mania] and lows [depression], and difficulty in walking. During a review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS), a standardized…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-03 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — patternHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide care in a manner that maintained or enhanced a resident's dignity and respect in full recognition of their individuality for ywo of two sampled residents (Resident 82 and Resident 59. The facility failed to: a. Ensure Resident 82 was dry and clean and provided with privacy while only wearing diaper. This failure had the potential to affect the resident's self-worth and dignity. b. Ensure Resident 59 indwelling urinary catheter ([foley catheter]- a tube that inserted into the bladder, allowing the urine to drain freely into a collection bag, which must be strapped and/ or secured) was enclosed in a privacy bag. This failure has the potential for Resident 59 to feel embarrassed and undignified. Findings: a. During a review of Resident 82's admission Order (Face Sheet), the admission Order indicated Resident 82 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including dysphagia (difficulty of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-03 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — patternReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure call light was within reach for two of three sampled residents (Resident 82 and 67). This failure had the potential for Resident 82 and 67 not able to find the call light to call for assistance when needed, and experienced loss of self-esteem. Findings: a. During a review of Resident 82's admission Order (Face Sheet), the admission Order indicated Resident 82 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including dysphagia (difficulty of swallowing), hemiplegia (complete paralysis and hemiparesis (partial weakness) following cerebral infarction (damage to the brain from interruption of its blood supply), essential hypertension (high blood pressure). During a review of Resident 82's Minimum Data Sheet (MDS- a comprehensive assessment and care screening tool) dated 3/29/24 indicated Resident 82 had moderate cognitive impairment (ability to learn, understand, and make decisions) and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-05-03 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — patternProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure two of two sampled residents (Resident 20 and Resident 145) was provided their activities of choice (preference). This failure has the potential for Resident 20 and Resident 145 to have no mental and emotional interaction that could negatively impact their quality of life. Findings: a. During a review of Resident 20's admission Record (Face sheet), indicated Resident 20 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including cerebral infraction (damage to the brain from interruption of its blood supply) with hemiplegia on the left side of the body (paralysis to the left side of the body). During a review of Resident 20's Minimum Data Set ([MDS] a comprehensive assessment and care screening tool) dated 4/23/2024, the MDS indicated Resident 20 was able to speak clearly, hear adequately and usually understands and able to be understood. The MDS indicated Resident 20's preferred activities were reading books, listening to music,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-05-03 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — patternProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility failed to ensure two of two sampled residents (Resident 17 and Resident 47): a. yankauer (an oral suctioning tool used in medical procedures), and suction machine tubing were dated, and b. oxygen tubing was dated and humifying water (sterile water incorporated with oxygen use to prevent irritation of the nasal passages during use of supplemental oxygen) was changed timely. These failures have the potential for the respiratory equipment to lose patency and delay delivery of care and services to Resident 17 and Resident 47. Findings: A. During a review of Resident 17's admission Record (Face sheet), the face sheet indicated Resident 17 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis including acute (urgent) and chronic (long lasting and do not quickly go away) respiratory failure ( a condition I which the lungs have a hard time loading the blood with oxygen {large amount of gas released in the air needed by plants, animals and human beings in order to live}and removing carbon dioxide {a waste…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-03 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide accurate and safe pharmaceutical services and procedures when: a. Medications for two of two residents (Resident 39 and Resident 16), were not disposed from the medication cart after being discontinued. b. Physician's orders for fentanyl (medication to treat pain) transdermal (placed on the skin) patches were not transcribed into the Medication Administration Record (MAR) for one of one resident (Resident 14) c. Medication destruction was not followed according to the Controlled Drug Record instructions for one of one resident (Resident 14). d. Ensure to check blood pressure parameter for a resident (Resident 148) prior to administering antihypertensive medication as ordered. These failures placed the residents at risk for accidental use of discontinued medications, adverse side effects and potential diversion of a medication with a high risk for addiction and dependence. The deficient practice of not checking blood pressure…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-03 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
During an observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure the refrigerator in the medication storage room was operating at a normal/ expected range of temperature per facility's policy (36-to-46-degree Fahrenheit {a temperature scale in which the freezing point of water is 32 degrees, and the boiling point is 212 degrees}). This failure has the potential for the medications stored in the refrigerator to lose potency (activity of the drug in terms of concentration or amount of the drug required to produce a desired effect) and efficacy (the ability of a drug to produce a desired effect) which could negatively affect the delivery of care and services to the residents. Findings: During an observation on 5/1/2024 at 9:55 a.m., of one of 2 (two) medication storage rooms, the refrigerator in the medication storage had a temperature of 54 degrees Fahrenheit. In the refrigerator were the following unopened and unexpired medications: 1. Lantus Solostar (a long-acting man-made insulin {a hormone that lowers the levels of glucose, or blood sugar} used to control high…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-03 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store food in a sanitary manner to prevent growth of infectious agents that could cause food borne illness (food poisoning: any illness resulting from the food spoilage or contaminated food) for 93 out of 95 total residents in the facility by failing to: 1. Ensure foods were dated, labeled, and discarded before the used by date (expiration dates). 2. Monitor and document room temperature in dry storage room daily. 3. Ensure three frozen packs of ham was properly thawed in the refrigerator. These failures had the potential to affect residents and result in pathogen (germ) exposure and placed residents at risk for developing food borne illness (food poisoning) with symptoms including upset stomach, stomach cramps, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, and fever and can lead to other serious medical complications and hospitalization. Findings: 1. During a concurrent observation and interview on 4/30/2024 at 8:32 a.m. with Kitchen Aid (KA), in refrigerator, freezer, and storage room, there were food items that were not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-03 · tag F0640 — isolatedEncode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the discharge Minimum Data Set (MDS-a comprehensive assessment and care screening tool) Assessment was transmitted to Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) within 14 days' time frame for one of 12 sampled residents (Resident 82). This failure had the potential to the delay in identifying resident care concerns needing individualized care plan, delay in providing residents interventions necessary to provide quality care and delay in the reimbursement process. Findings: During a review of Resident 82's admission Order (Face Sheet), the admission Order indicated Resident 82 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including dysphagia (difficulty of swallowing), hemiplegia (complete paralysis and hemiparesis (partial weakness) following cerebral infarction (damage to the brain from interruption of its blood supply), essential hypertension (high blood pressure). During a review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-03 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of one sampled resident (Resident 20) fingernails were clean and trimmed. This failure has resulted to Resident 20's right hand fingernails to have irregular edges, accumulation of dark brown substance under the fingernails and had the potential to cause infection and impaired skin integrity. Findings: During a review of Resident 20's admission Record (Face sheet), the face sheet indicated Resident 20 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis including cerebral infarction (stroke- blood flow in the brain is stopped or there is a sudden bleeding in the brain) with hemiplegia on the left side of the body (paralysis to the left side of the body) and diabetes mellitus (a disease that occurs when the blood glucose or blood sugar in the body is too high) and peripheral vascular disease (a disease that is caused by restricted blood flow to the tissues of the body). During a review of Resident 20's Minimum Data Set ([MDS] a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-03 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure one of two sampled residents (Resident 20) was provided range of motion exercises by the certified nursing assistant staff during activities of daily living (the routine activities that people do to take care of their basic needs such as eating, bathing, dressing, grooming, toileting, repositioning and transferring). This failure has the potential for Resident 20 to decline with mobility and/ or function and develop and/ or worsen contractures (fixed tightening of the muscles, tendons, ligaments, or skin that prevents normal movement) to her extremities. Findings: During a review of Resident 20's admission Record (Face sheet), the face sheet indicated Resident 20 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis including cerebral infraction (stroke- blood flow in the brain is stopped or there is a sudden bleeding in the brain) with hemiplegia on the left side of the body (paralysis to the left side of the body). During a review…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-03 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of one sampled resident (Resident 39) was free from unnecessary drugs by: Failing to assessed Resident 39 for infection before starting oral antibiotic ( drug used to treat infections caused by bacteria and other microorganisms) medication. This failure had the potential to result in Resident 39 receiving unnecessary medication. Findings: During a review of Resident 39's admission Order (Face Sheet) indicated Resident 39 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including dysphagia (difficulty of swallowing), pressure ulcer of sacral region stage 4 (damage to an area of the skin caused by constant pressure on the area for a long time), acute cystitis without hematuria (sudden inflammation of the bladder without presenting blood in the urine). During a review of Resident 39's Minimum Data Sheet (MDS- a comprehensive assessment and care screening tool) dated 2/16/24 indicated Resident 39 had moderate cognitive impairment (ability to learn,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-03 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure one of eight residents (Resident 14) was free from significant medication error by failing to administer fentanyl (medication use to treat severe pain) transdermal (on the skin) patches as ordered by the physician. This deficient practice placed the resident at risk for higher dosage of medication and respiratory depression. Findings: During a review of Resident 14's admission Record (facesheet), indicated resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including arthrogryposis multiplex congenita (condition that causes stiffness in the joints), pain due to an internal orthopedic prosthetic (artificial substitute to a part of the body) with history of joint replacement surgery, peripheral vascular disease (narrowed arteries causing reduced blood flow to the arms and legs), gout (inflammation of the joints), difficulty walking and muscle weakness. A review of Resident 14's Electronically Transmitted Prescription orders…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-03 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to maintain clinical records in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices for document Resident 14's records of fentanyl patch that required two signatures of licensed staff accurately and completely. This failure had the potential for non-accountability of medication and drug diversion. Findings: During an interview with the Dispensing Pharmacist (DPh) on 5/2/2024 at 9:59 a.m., the DPh stated nurses should fill out the date and time the fentanyl patches were removed and when removed, two nurses' signatures are required on the form. During an interview on 5/3/2024 at 12:12 p.m. with Director of Nursing (DON), the DON stated that licensed staff signatures was to verify if fentanyl patch was given or removed. DON stated if the patches are not monitored, that can cause overdose and respiratory failure. During a review of Controlled Drug Record dated 2/28/2024 through 3/18/2024, 3/20/2024 through 3/28/2024, 3/30/2024 through 4/7/2024 and 4/11/2024 through/19/2024 indicated when patch is removed,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-03 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — isolatedImplement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement their protocol for Antibiotic Stewardship (refers to a set of commitments and actions designed to optimize the treatment of infections while reducing the adverse events associated with antibiotic use) for one of two sampled residents (Resident 39). Resident 39 was prescribed antibiotic ( drug used to treat infections caused by bacteria and other microorganisms) drug without meeting the criteria and prior to assessing for wound infection. This failure had the potential for resident to develop antibiotic resistance (not effective to treat infection) from unnecessary or inappropriate antibiotic use. Findings: During a review of Resident 39's admission Order (Face Sheet) indicated Resident 39 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including dysphagia (difficulty of swallowing), pressure ulcer of sacral region stage 4 (damage to an area of the skin caused by constant pressure on the area for a long time), acute cystitis without hematuria (sudden…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-02-29 · tag F0882 — widespreadDesignate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure there was a facility Infection Preventionist (specially trained professional who makes sure healthcare workers and residents are doing all the things they should to prevent infections [IP]) as indicated in the facility assessment for ninety of ninety residents. This deficient practice had the potential to result in the increased spread of COVID-19 (a contagious and potentially severe respiratory illness) infection in the facility and the community. Findings: During a review of the facility document Notice to Employee as to Change in relationship (undated), the document indicated Licensed Vocational Nurse 2 (LVN 2), former IP, resigned on 1/12/2024. During an observation on 2/29/2024 at 11:16 a.m., it was noted that there was no Infection Preventionist nurse in the facility. During an interview on 2/29/2024 at 12 p.m. with the director of staff development (DSD), the DSD stated there was no Infection Preventionist now, the previous IP resigned 1/12/2024 as indicated in the resignation form and has the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-29 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure gloves and alcohol-based hand sanitizers were available for use in four out of four resident rooms. These failures placed all the residents, staff, and the community at higher risk for cross contamination (transfer of harmful germs from one person, object, or place to another) and increased spread of COVID-19 (a potentially severe respiratory illness) infection in the facility and the community. Findings: During an interview on 2/29/2024 at 10:28 a.m. with the Maintenance Supervisor (MS), the MS stated staff complained about having no gloves two a weeks ago and had to order more. During a concurrent observation and interview with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN 1) in four different resident rooms on 2/29/2024 at 11:25 a.m., the in-room alcohol-based hand sanitizers were all empty and there were no gloves available. LVN 1 stated especially because there was an outbreak (at least one resident was positive with Covid-19), staff should have easy access to gloves and hand sanitizers. During an interview on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-03 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — patternHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to determine the call lights were within reach and useable, for two of three sampled residents (Resident 1 and 3): A. Resident 1's call light was observed hanging over the top of lamp. B. Resident 3 ' s call light was found on the floor. These failures had the potential for Residents 1 and 3 not to receive necessary assistance when needed, and experienced loss of self-esteem. Findings: A. During a review of Resident 1's admission Record, the record indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (a disease causes obstructed airflow from the lungs), Parkinsonism (brain conditions that cause slowed movements, stiffness, and tremors), diabetes mellitus (irregular blood sugar). A review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS), a standardized assessment and care planning tool, dated 10/15/2023, indicated Resident 1's cognitive (relating to the process of acquiring…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
“Disputed” is CMS’s own flag, not our reading: the CMS deficiency file records whether the home has formally contested a citation, and we reproduce that. IDR is Informal Dispute Resolution, run by the state survey agency that wrote the citation; IIDR is Independent Informal Dispute Resolution, a separate process before an outside entity, available when CMS has proposed a civil money penalty. They are different processes and we mark them differently. Two things to hold at once. A disputed citation is still a citation — it was written by a surveyor, it stands on the record unless and until it is changed, and we neither hide it nor discount it. And we cannot tell you how the dispute came out: CMS publishes that a citation is under dispute, not the outcome, so a tag marked here may since have been upheld, reduced, or deleted, and an unmarked tag may have been disputed and resolved before this file was cut. Ask the home what it disputed and why — it is entitled to tell you, and the answer is often the most informative thing on this page.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$6,351 in federal fines across 1 penalty. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.
- $6,351 — penalty dated 2023-12-11
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2025-06-07 for 1 days
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| VALDOMAR, CELIA | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE; CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER | 100% | since 08/07/1980 |
| BRYDON, JOSEPHINE | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 01/01/2012 |
| GLENWRIGHT, DEBORAH | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 01/01/2012 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 7 rows in the source record cover these 3 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 76% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $741K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in CA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 055527. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-06-25, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.