Villa Marin

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

54.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 39 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 78.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 28 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.44 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 74% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 18% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 31 beds and averages 15.5 residents a day — about 50% occupied, or roughly 16 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 7.15 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.96 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 4.10 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 5.64 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 7.77 on weekdays — 27% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 2.29 to 1.15 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

21 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 10 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2023-08-18 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision to one of two residents at risk for falls (Resident 117) when Resident 117 was left unsupervised on her wheelchair after lunch. This failure resulted in Resident 117 getting up from the wheelchair unassisted, falling, injuring her head, right knee, elbow, and being sent to the hospital for evaluation and treatment of her injuries. Findings: A review of Resident 117's admission Record indicated she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including hemiplegia (paralysis) and hemiparesis (weakness or inability to move) following cerebral infarction (stroke ) affecting the left side of the body. A review of Resident 117's Fall Risk Evaluation (a standardized tool that assesses the resident's risk for falls based on different parameters), dated 7/10/23, indicated Resident 117 was at HIGH RISK for falls. The Fall Risk Evaluation indicated Resident 117 had the following fall risk factors: a history of falls, was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-11-18 · tag F0801 — widespread
  Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure sufficient staff to fulfill the responsibilities of a full-time supervisor of the Skilled Nursing Facility food and nutrition service.This failure had the potential to place residents at risk for impaired nutritional status.Findings:During an interview on 9/24/25 at 2:42 p.m. with Registered Dietician (RD), RD stated she worked at the facility a minimum of eight hours a week, and that the dietary lead (DL) oversaw tray line, menus, snacks, supplements, and meal preferences for skilled nursing residents. RD stated that the DL reported to the General Kitchen Manager (GKM).During an interview on 9/24/25 at 3:28 p.m. with GKM, GKM stated he oversaw assisted living and skilled nursing units. GKM stated that the DL was responsible for skilled nursing and assisted living units and that the DL did work full-time but that time is split between the two different units. GKM stated they do not have a designated full-time staff for just the skilled nursing unit. During an interview on 9/25/25 at 8:31 a.m. with Health Services…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-11-18 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store food in a safe and sanitary manner when:1. Multiple food items were not discarded after their use-by-date.2. Opened food items were not properly labeled with open and use-by-date.These failures had the potential to cause food-borne illnesses in an already medically fragile population.Findings:1. During a concurrent observation and interview on 9/22/25 at 3:25 p.m. in the main kitchen with the General Kitchen Manager (GKM), kitchen refrigerator 5 was observed with the following items past their use by date: Tuna Salad - use by 9/12/25Pepper Dressing - use by 9/12/25Bag of Turkey - use by 9/14/25Bag of Ham - use by 9/22/25 at 11:53 a.m.The GKM confirmed the items were past their use by date and stated they should have been discarded. During a concurrent observation and interview on 9/22/25 at 3:41p.m. in the main kitchen with the GKM, walk-in freezer 2 was observed with the following items past their use by date:3 bags of vegetable…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-11-18 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — pattern
  Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the medication error rate was not greater than five percent when six identified medication errors out of 27 opportunities were observed for three of five sampled residents (Resident 2, Resident 16 and Resident 21).These failures resulted in an overall facility medication error rate of 22.22% and had the potential to result in negative health outcomes for Resident 2, Resident 16 and Resident 27. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the medication error rate was not greater than five percent when six identified medication errors out of 27 opportunities were observed for three of five sampled residents (Resident 2, Resident 16 and Resident 21).These failures resulted in an overall facility medication error rate of 22.22% and had the potential to result in negative health outcomes for Resident 2, Resident 16 and Resident 27.Findings:1. During a review of the Record of Admission, the Record…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-11-18 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure housekeeping staff donned personal protective equipment (PPE - clothing and equipment that is worn or used to provide protection against hazardous substances and/or environments) when handling 14 out of 15 resident's soiled laundry. This failure had the potential to negatively impact the residents.Findings:During an interview on 9/24/25 at 8:03 a.m. with the Housekeeper, the Housekeeper stated the resident's soiled laundry was transported in a clear plastic bag to the laundry room and was removed from the clear plastic bag and placed in the washer machine. The Housekeeper stated she does not don a gown during handling of the resident's soiled laundry. During an interview on 9/24/25 at 3:06 p.m. with the Infection Preventionist (IP), the IP stated housekeeping staff should don proper PPE which includes a mask, gloves and a gown during the handling of resident soiled laundry for infection prevention and control practices. During an interview on 09/25/2025 at 8:21 a.m. with the Housekeeper Director (HSD), the HSD…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-11-18 · tag F0640 — isolated
  Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record reviews, the facility failed to transmit the Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment care - planning tool) to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) within 14 days after the completion for two of 15 sampled residents (Resident 1 and Resident 6).This failure resulted in the delay of information to CMS for payment and quality measure purposes and for potential changes in Resident 1 and Resident 6's condition to be missed or go unaddressed.1 Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with a diagnosis that included pneumonia. During a record review on 9/24/25 at 3:47p.m. Resident 1's quarterly MDS assessment was reviewed. The quarterly MDS was initiated on 8/6/25 and completed (signed by the Director of Nurses (DON) ) on 8/24/25. The MDS was not transmitted to CMS until 9/23/25 (29 days after it was completed). During a concurrent interview and record review of Resident 1's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-04-10 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and records review, the facility failed to report an allegation of abuse to the California Department of Public Health (CDPH) in accordance with Federal requirements for one of two sampled residents (Resident 1). This failure resulted in a delayed investigation of the alleged abuse by CDPH and had the potential for other residents to be at risk of abuse. Findings: On 4/02/24 at 1:42 p.m., CDPH received a Facility Reported Incident regarding a facility staff member being physically aggressive to Resident 1. A review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS - health status screening and assessment tool used for all residents) dated 1/16/24 indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis including but not limited to Dementia (impaired ability to remember, think, or make decisions that interferes with doing everyday activities); Left eye blindness and Anxiety (intense, excessive, and persistent worry and fear about everyday situations). The MDS indicated Resident 1 had a BIMS…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2023-08-18 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — pattern
  Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a program supporting the residents choice of activities with activities supporting the residents physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being, and encouraging interaction with the community, for one of eight sampled residents (Resident 2), when the activities provided by the facility to Resident 2 were limited to having the TV turned on in her room, despite activity assessments which indicated Resident 2 enjoyed reading, listening to music, being around pets, and spending time outdoors. This failure resulted in Resident 2 not having her activities needs met. Findings: A review of Resident 2's admission Record indicated she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including cerebral infarction (stroke), hemiplegia (paralysis on one side of the body), hemiparesis (weakness in one side of the body), aphasia (loss of ability to understand or express speech due to brain damage), difficulty in walking, muscle weakness,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2023-08-18 · tag F0700 — pattern
  Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure timely documentation of resident assessments for the risk of entrapment from bed rails and obtaining informed consent prior to installation of bed rails for 15 of 15 residents. This failure placed residents at risk of entrapment. Findings: During an interview and concurrent record review on 8/18/23 at 8:05 a.m., the DON (Director of Nursing) stated all 31 resident beds had bilateral quarter-size bedrails. The DON provided a copy of form titled Interdisciplinary Assessment and Progress Notes which had a field for evaluation of bed rails for entrapment risks and space to document informed consent completed for all residents upon admission. The DON reviewed the charts of all 15 facility residents and stated the entrapment risk assessment fields had not been completed. During an interview on 8/18/23, at 11:45 a.m., the DON stated assessment of bed rails for risk of entrapment had been completed and documented and informed consent obtained for all but two residents, and no residents were at risk for entrapment. A review…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2023-08-18 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — pattern
  Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Agency/Registry (staffing agencies that hire and train staff and place nursing professionals in a variety of nursing positions) Licensed Nurses and Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs) had the competencies and skills necessary to care for its residents' needs when: 1) the facility did not verify that Agency/Registry Licensed Nurses and CNAs had valid and complete competency/skills checks to meet resident needs prior to working at the facility; 2) an Agency/Registry Licensed Nurse (Licensed Nurse E) did not perform hand hygiene per facility policies prior to medication administration to five residents (cross-reference to Tag F880 - Infection Control); 3) an Agency/Registry Licensed Nurse (Licensed Nurse E) attempted to perform a medical procedure involving blood draw using needles on a resident who did not have orders for and did not need the procedure, and was only stopped by the resident who refused the procedure; and 4) the facility did not have a policy and procedure governing its use of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-18 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow best practices for infection prevention and control when three of three Licensed Nurses (Licensed Nurses D, E and F) did not perform hand hygiene (washed hands or used hand sanitizer) before preparing medications and administering them to eight of eight residents (Residents 1, 3, 4, 5, 6, 9, 10 and 11) and when one Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) provided care to a resident without performing prior hand hygiene. These failures placed Residents Residents 1, 3, 4, 5, 6, 9, 10 and 11 at risk of the spread of infections. Findings: During an observation on 8/16/23, at 4:35 p.m., Licensed Nurse D began preparing medications for Resident 9 on the medication cart on the hallway outside Resident 9's room. Licensed Nurse D placed three medications in a cup and entered Resident 9's room and gave them to Resident 9. License Nurse D did not perform hand hygiene before preparing the medications and administering them to Resident 9. During an observation on 8/16/23, at 5 p.m., Licensed Nurse D began preparing…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 5 rows in the source record cover these 3 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

What families pay in CA