Town & Country
555 East Memory Lane, Santa Ana, CA 92706 · Non profit - Corporation · 96 certified beds · (714) 547-7157 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home’s record is mixed — some reassuring signs, some worth asking about.
- a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- a high payroll-based staffing rating (5/5)
- lower-than-typical staff turnover (32% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (53) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 3 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 5 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 5 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 5 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 3 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 5 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 7.6% | 10.2% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 3.7% | 4.0% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.8% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 1.7% | 1.2% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 0.0% | 7.3% | 6.5% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.4% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 0.0% | 1.6% | 3.3% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 7.1% | 9.8% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 10.7% | 13.7% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 98.2% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 3.9% | 4.3% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 6.9% | 10.2% | 21.2% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 0.6% | 12.0% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.4% | 1.5% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 99.6% | 93.2% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 24.3% | 23.0% | 22.6% | typical |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 7.7% | 11.2% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.34 | 2.25 | 1.67 | better |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 0.71 | 1.57 | 1.80 | better |
* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
50.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 425 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 25.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 196 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.72 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 92% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 8% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 50.5%CMS range 46.4–54.7 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 8.8%CMS range 6.8–11.1 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 25.0% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 26.5% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 16.8% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 98.1% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 99.5% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 97.6% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 6.2%CMS range 3.9–9.3 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.20 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 96 beds and averages 83.1 residents a day — about 87% occupied, or roughly 13 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 5.47 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.76 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.21 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.60 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.82 on weekdays — 21% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.83 to 0.60 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 32% is below the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
53 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 43 are one tap away and print in full.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-11-20 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, facility document review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the food safety and sanitation guidelines were followed. * Meat thawing process was not followed; * Expired food was not discarded; * Meal preparation equipment was not air dried; * The food preparation sink did not have backflow prevention; * Food preparation equipment was not clean; and * Cutting boards were stained and heavily marred. These failures posed the risk for food-borne illnesses in highly susceptible resident population of 82 facility residents who received food prepared in the kitchen.Findings: 1. According to USDA Food Code 2022, Section 3-501.13, freezing prevents microbial growth in foods, but usually does not destroy all microorganisms. Improper thawing provides an opportunity for surviving bacteria to grow to harmful numbers and/or produce toxins. Review of the facility's P&P titled Food Handling Guidelines revised 1/2025 showed raw meat is removed from the freezer Day 1; it must be cooked by the end +4 days. Label with the date it was removed from the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-11-20 · tag F0909 — failed to maintain a comfortable temperature — patternRegularly inspect all bed frames, mattresses, and bed rails (if any) for safety; and all bed rails and mattresses must attach safely to the bed frame.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, facility document review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the residents' entrapment assessments were accurate and complete for 10 of 10 final sampled residents (Residents 1, 3, 7, 8, 10, 11, 29, 37, 43, and 58) reviewed for bed rails use. * The facility failed to ensure the entrapment assessment of bed rails were accurate and complete for Residents 1, 3, 7, 8, 10, 11, 29, 37, 43, and 58. These failures had the potential to negatively impact the residents resulting in possible entrapment, serious injury, and death. Findings: According to the Hospital Bed System Dimensional and Assessment Guidance to Reduce Entrapment, the term entrapment describes an event in which a patient/resident is caught, trapped, or entangled in the space in or about the bed rail, mattress, or hospital bed frame. Patient entrapment may result in deaths and serious injuries. These entrapment events have occurred in openings within the bed rails, between the bed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-11-20 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolatedPrevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure one of five final sampled residents (Resident 45) reviewed for unnecessary medications was free from unnecessary psychotropic medications. * Resident 45's medical record did not include the prescriber's clinical rationale for the continued use of the PRN (as needed) psychotropic medication. This failure had the potential for the resident to experience adverse effects for the use of the psychotropic medication. Findings: Review of the facility's Use of Psychotropic Drugs P&P revised 11/13/23, showed the PRN psychotropic medications extended beyond 14 days, the prescriber shall document the rational in the resident's medical record. Medical record review for Resident 45 was initiated on 9/22/25. Resident 45 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident 45's Order Summary Report showed the following physician orders:- dated 8/20/25, for Xanax (a psychotropic medication for anxiety) 0.25 mg by mouth PRN…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-11-20 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to report an allegation of physical abuse to local law enforcement for one of three final sampled residents (Resident 32) investigated for abuse. * The facility failed to notify the law enforcement of Resident 32's allegation of a CNA being too rough with him. This failure had the potential to delay local law enforcement interventions related to the abuse allegation.Findings:Review of the facility's Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation P&P revised 4/19/24, showed abuse allegations will be reported to the required agencies (e.g., law enforcement when applicable) no later than 24 hours (if the events that causes the allegation did not involve abuse and do not result in serious bodily injury. Review of the Welfare and Institutions Code section 15630 (b)(1)(A)(i & ii) showed all allegations of physical abuse, abandonment, abduction, isolation, financial abuse, or neglect, will be reported to local law enforcement both verbally, as…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-20 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the abuse investigation protocol was followed for one of three final sampled residents (Resident 46) investigated for abuse. * Family Member 1 reported CNA 2 allegedly hit Resident 46. The facility failed to ensure CNA 2 was removed from the facility during the investigation of the abuse allegation. The failure had the potential to negatively impact Resident 46's well-being.Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation revised on 4/19/24, showed the following:- it is the policy of this facility to provide protections for the health, welfare and rights of eachresident by developing and implementing written policies and procedures that prohibit andprevent abuse, neglect, exploitation and misappropriation of resident property;- existing staff will receive annual education through planned in-services and as needed;- responding immediately to protect the alleged victim and integrity of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-20 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review and facility P&P review, the facility failed to provide the services to attain or maintain the highest practicable well-being for one nonsampled resident (Resident 52). * Resident 52 was prescribed two medications to manage the BP. The facility failed to ensure a physician's order was obtained to monitor Resident 52's BP. This failure had the potential to negatively affect the resident's health condition and well-being. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Vital Signs revised 5/12/23, showed the vital signs are indicators of health status, including temperature, pulse, blood pressure, respiratory rate, oxygen saturation. The vital signs shall be obtained at least in the following circumstances: at least weekly for a resident receiving custodial care, or non-skilled services. On 9/23/25 at 0804 hours, a medication administration observation for Resident 52 was conducted with LVN 4. LVN 4 administered the amlodipine (calcium channel blocker) and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-11-20 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and medical record review, the facility failed to provide the appropriate care and services for one of one final sampled resident (Resident 29) reviewed for the use of the indwelling urinary catheter (a thin, hollow tube inserted through the urethra into the urinary bladder to collect and drain urine). * The facility failed to accurately monitor the fluid intake and output of Resident 29 related to the urinary catheter use as per the physician's order. The monitoring of Resident 29's urine output documented in the MAR (Medication Administration Record) did not match the CNAs documentation. In addition, the calculation of the daily total of Resident 29's urine output was inaccurate and in turn, the weekly calculation of Resident 29's urine output was also inaccurate. These failures posed the risk for the resident to have fluid imbalances resulting in kidney damage or heart failure, inadequate hydration leading to infection, and delayed detection of CAUTI (Catheter-Associated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-11-20 · tag F0694 — isolatedProvide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and medical record review, the facility failed to ensure the physician's orders were clear and concise for one final sampled resident (Resident 32) investigated for intravenous care. * The facility failed to ensure Resident 32's physician's orders related to IV (Intravenous) care clearly indicated the IV access type as a PICC (Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter). This failure had the potential for the staff to not provide appropriate care for the resident's PICC line. Findings: Medical record review for Resident 32 was initiated on 9/22/25. Resident 32 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident 32's Order Summary Report showed the following physician's orders: - dated 8/22/25, for all blood draws through the PICC- dated 8/22/25, to change the administration set every day-shift- dated 8/22/25, to change the catheter site dressing every Friday, observe the site and note observations in a progress note. - dated 8/22/25, to change the catheter site dressing as needed with a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-20 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to provide the necessary respiratory care and services for two of two final sampled residents (Residents 11 and 29) reviewed for respiratory care. * The facility failed to ensure Resident 11 and 29's nebulizer masks were properly cleaned after each use and stored when not in use. This failure had the potential for cross-contamination and increased risks of infection for Residents 11 and 29.Findings: 1. Review of the facility's P&P titled Nebulizer Therapy revised 8/12/23, showed the following: - The purpose of this procedure is to safely and aseptically administer aerosolized particles of medication into the resident's airway; and - The Steps in the Procedure section included: when treatment is complete, turn off the nebulizer and disconnect T-piece, mouthpiece and medication cup. Wash and dry hands. Rinse and disinfect the nebulizer equipment according to facility protocol, or wash pieces with water, and allow…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-11-20 · tag F0700 — isolatedTry different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure one of four final sampled residents reviewed for side rail use (Resident 11) remained free from the accident hazards associated with the use of elevated bed rails. * The facility failed to ensure the assessments, physician's order, care plan, and consent were completed and obtained for Resident 11's use of bed rails. These failures had the potential to put the resident at risk for entrapment and serious injuries.Findings: According to the FDA's Safety Alert entitled Entrapment Hazards with Hospital Bed Side Rails, residents most at risk for entrapment are those who are frail or elderly or those who have conditions such as agitation, delirium, confusion, pain, uncontrolled body movement, hypoxia, fecal impaction, acute urinary retention, etc., that may cause them to move about the bed or try to exit from the bed. Entrapment may occur when a resident is caught between the mattress and bed rail or in the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 43 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-20 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure one of five final sampled residents (Resident 32) reviewed for unnecessary medications was free from unnecessary psychotropic medications. * The facility failed to ensure Resident 32's physician's orders were appropriate and properly clarified. This failure resulted in the prescriber's orders not being transcribed correctly in the resident's medical record and could have potentially lead to missed medication. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Medication Orders revised 8/29/23, showed the nurse will transcribe handwritten physician's orders into the resident's electronic medical record. If necessary, the order should be clarified before the physician leaves the nursing station whenever possible. Medical record review for Resident 32 was initiated on 9/22/25. Resident 32 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident 32's Order Summary Report showed a physician's order dated 9/15/25, to resume…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-20 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to provide the necessary pharmacy services to ensure the proper storage and disposal of the drugs and biologicals. * The facility failed to ensure safe storage of the medications when LVN 9 left medications on Resident 3's bedside table during medication administration observation. * The facility failed to ensure the bubble packs containing the gabapentin (anticonvulsant) tablets for Resident 3 and zolpidem (sedative medication) tablets for Resident 21 remained intact and free from tears inside Medication Cart B. * The facility failed to ensure safe storage of the medications when LVN 3 left medications on Resident 15's bedside table during the medication administration observation. * The facility failed to ensure the opened medication package was stored properly and an expired medication was disposed of in Medication Cart C. * The facility failed to ensure the temperature for the refrigerator containing intravenous and other medications requiring refrigeration was within the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-11-20 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, facility document review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to provide only food in a form designed to meet the individual needs for one of 11 residents (Resident 45) receiving soft and bite sized diet (food that are soft, tender and moist throughout but with no separate thin liquid). *Resident 45 was served breakfast with Cheerios cereal added to the resident's meal tray. This failure had the potential to result in difficulty in swallowing, chewing, decrease in food and nutrient intake, resulting in possible unintended (not planned) weight loss and choking (when food gets stuck in the airway, blocking the flow of air to the lungs).Findings: Review of the International Dysphagia Diet Standardization Initiative (IDDSI) A global initiative that developed standardized terminology and definitions for texture-modified foods and thickened liquids used for individuals with dysphagia (difficulty swallowing) and chewing) guideline website titled IDDSI dated 7/2019 the IDDSI guideline showed, Level 6 Soft and Bite Sized is eaten with a fork, spoon…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-11-20 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the food preferences were honored for one nonsampled resident (Resident 17) who received food prepared in the kitchen. * The facility served pork to Resident 17 during lunch when there was a physician's order for no pork, and resident's religious preference for no pork. This failure had the potential to negatively impact the resident's food intake and well-being. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Resident Dining Profile and Food Preferences revised 1/2025 showed individual food and dining preferences incorporating religious, cultural, ethics, and portion sizes are obtained from residents and/or a resident representative(s) on a regular basis. Food and dining preferences will be obtained as soon as possible but not exceeding 72 hours after admission.Resident preferences include:- dining preferences;- dislikes;- allergies;- cultural, religious, and ethnic preferences;- mealtime preferences;-…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-20 · tag F0813 — isolatedHave a policy regarding use and storage of foods brought to residents by family and other visitors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the residents had the ability to store and reheat food brought from outside the facility. * There was no microwave or refrigerator available to use for the residents' food brought from outside the facility to be stored or reheat. This failure had the potential to negatively impact the resident's well-being.Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Use of Food Brought into the Facility revised 10/1/24, showed all the food items that are already prepared by the family or visitor brought in must be for immediate consumption. On 9/23/25 at 1415 hours, an interview was conducted with LVN 9. LVN 9 stated there was no microwave or refrigerator to use for the residents' food brought from outside the facility. LVN 9 stated if a visitor brought in food from outside the facility, it must be consumed right away. The facility did not store food or reheat food. On 9/23/25 at 1430 hours, an interview was conducted with RN 2. RN 2 stated there was no microwave or refrigerator available to use for residents'…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-20 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to implement the infection control practices designed to provide the safe and sanitary environment and help prevent the development and transmission of diseases and infections for one final sampled resident (Resident 7) and one nonsampled resident (Resident 96) reviewed for infection control. * The facility failed to ensure CNA 1 performed proper hand hygiene after providing incontinence and indwelling urinary catheter care to Resident 7. * The facility failed to ensure COTA 1 wore a gown when transferring Resident 96, who was on the EBP from the wheelchair to bed. These failures had the potential for cross-contamination and spread of infectious organisms throughout the facility. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Hand Hygiene revised 4/21/24, showed the following: - Staff will perform hand hygiene when indicated, using proper technique consistent with accepted standards of practice; - Hand hygiene is…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-20 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — isolatedKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and facility document review, the facility failed to maintain essential equipment in safe operating condition. * The facility failed to ensure two of two glucometers (a device which measures the amount of sugar in the blood) currently used and stored in Medication Carts A and B were properly calibrated. This posed the risk for inaccurate blood glucose test results used to determine the residents' insulin doses which could lead to inappropriate treatments and negatively affect the well-being of the residents. Findings: 1. Review of the EvenCare G2 Blood Glucose Monitoring System User's Guide dated 2017 showed the following: - Under Control Solution Testing section showed the purpose of the control solution testing is to make sure the EvenCare G2 meter and the EvenCare G2 test strips are working properly; - The Step 3 in performing a control solution test showed a ctl icon will appear next to the test strip and L1 will appear on the meter display screen; and - Under the Viewing Your Meter's Memory section showed control test results are flagged by ctl…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-11-20 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolatedMake sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the call light system (a communication system which are utilized by the residents to call for staff assistance) for two of two nurses stations (Nurse Stations A and B) were fully functional. * The facility failed to ensure the call light system panel console had an audible sound heard from Nurse Stations A and B. These failures had the potential for the residents in the facility not to receive assistance from the staff in a timely manner. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Call lights revised 3/26/23, showed the purpose of this policy is to assure the facility is adequately equipped with a call light at each resident's bedside, toilet, and bathing facility to allow the residents to call for assistance. Call lights will directly relay to a staff member or centralized location to ensure appropriate response. Ensure the call systems alerts staff members directly or goes to a centralized staff work area. Staff members who see or hear an activated call light are responsible for responding.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-07-24 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the baseline care plan for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) was initiated upon admission. * The facility failed to ensure Resident 1's baseline care plan included the necessary information to properly care for the resident with ileostomy (a surgery that lets stool pass from your body without going through your colon or anus) and the necessary nutritional interventions to maintain or prevent weight loss of the resident. This failure had the potential for Resident 1 to not receive the necessary resident-centered care.Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled admission of a Resident revised on 8/23/23, showed the admission process is intended to obtain all possible information regarding the resident for the development of the comprehensive plan of care, and to assist the resident in becoming comfortable in the facility. The residents are admitted to the facility under orders of the attending physician.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-24 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the care plan was developed for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) who had a change in condition. * The facility failed to develop a care plan when Resident 1 had nausea, vomiting, poor meal intake, and weight loss. This failure had the potential for Resident 1 to not receive the necessary care and services.Findings: Review facility's P&P titled Resident Change of Condition revised on 5/22/24, showed it is the policy of this facility that all changes in resident condition will be communicated to the physician. The nurse in charge is responsible for the notification of the physician prior to end of the assigned shift when a change in a resident's condition is noted. To document the resident change of condition and response in Nursing Progress Notes, on Twenty-Four Hour Report and update resident care plan as indicated. Closed medical record review for Resident 1 was initiated on 7/22/25. Resident was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-24 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to provide the necessary care and services to ensure one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) attained and maintained the highest practicable physical well-being. The facility failed to to notify Resident 1's physician regarding the discharge instructions from the acute care hospital to provide specific fluid amount and type to the resident, and to monitor the resident's intake and output. In addition, the facility failed to notify the physician regarding the resident's weight loss of 17 pounds timely. This failure posed the risk for Resident 1 to not receive the necessary care and services timely to maintain the resident's highest physical well-being.Findings: a. Review of the facility's P&P titled admission of a Resident revised on 8/23/23, showed the admission process is intended to obtain all the possible information regarding the resident for the development of the comprehensive plan of care, and to assist the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-13 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, facility document review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the food safety and sanitary requirements were met in the kitchen. * The facility failed to ensure the ice machine was properly cleaned. * The facility failed to ensure the ice scoopers were properly stored. * The facility failed to ensure the food items were discarded on or before the best by date. * The facility failed to ensure the food preparation utensils and equipment were in good, sanitary, and cleanable working conditions. * The facility failed to ensure the kitchen staff wore hair and beard restraint. * The facility failed to ensure the blender was free of water prior to use. * The facility failed to ensure the water liners were covered during transportation in the hallway. * The facility failed to ensure the kitchen staff performed hand hygiene. These failures had the potential to cause foodborne illnesses to the medically vulnerable resident population who consumed food prepared in the kitchen. Findings: Review of the facility document titled Diet Type Report…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-13 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, facility document review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to establish and maintain the infection control program and practices designed to help prevent the development and transmission of diseases and infections as evidenced by: * The facility failed to ensure the contact and droplet precautions were practiced for Resident 569. * The facility failed to ensure the infection control was maintained in the laundry room. * The facility failed to show consistent and accurate documentation of its testing protocols for Legionella and other opportunistic pathogens in building water systems. These failures had the potential risk for transmission of communicable diseases or organisms to residents in the facility. Findings: 1. Review of the facility's P&P titled Transmission Based Precautions revised 10/31/22, showed the Definitions section includes the following: - Contact precautions refer to measures that are intended to prevent transmission of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-13 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — patternKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, facility document review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the essential kitchen equipment were in safe operating condition. * The facility failed to ensure two of two ice machines were properly cleaned as per the ice machine cleaning instruction. This failure had the potential for ice served from the kitchen to be unsanitary. Findings: Review of the facility document titled Hoshizaki Instruction Manual revised 11/2018 showed Hoshizaki provides this manual primarily to assist qualified service technicians in the installation, maintenance, and service of the appliance. Further review of the facility document showed the cleaning and sanitizing instructions in the manual included the following: - Cleaning solution: dilute 9.6 fl. oz. (0.29 L) of Hoshizaki Scale Away with 1.6 gal (6.0 L) of warm water. This is a minimum amount. Make more solution if necessary. - Sanitizing solution: dilute 2.5 fl. oz. (75 ml or 5 tbs) of 5.25% sodium hypochlorite solution (chorine bleach) with 5 gallons (19 L) of warm water. This is a minimum…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-13 · tag F0909 — failed to maintain a comfortable temperature — patternRegularly inspect all bed frames, mattresses, and bed rails (if any) for safety; and all bed rails and mattresses must attach safely to the bed frame.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 15. On 9/10/24 at 0911 hours, a concurrent observation and interview was conducted with Resident 37. Resident 37 was observed sitting in his wheelchair next his bed, with bilateral side rails elevated. Resident 37 stated he used the side rails to help turning himself in bed and getting out of bed. On 09/11/24 at 0806 hours, a concurrent observation and interview was conducted with Resident 37. Resident 37 stated the bilateral side rails were elevated all the time. Medical record review for Resident 37 was initiated on 9/10/24. Resident 37 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident 37's H&P examination dated 7/28/24, showed Resident 37 had the capacity to understand and make decisions. Review of Resident 37's Bed Rail Assessment and Consent dated 7/26/24, showed the resident and the resident's representative requested the use of the side rails for mobility and transfer assistance and the resident's representative gave consent for the use of the side rails. However, the Bed Rail Assessment and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-13 · tag F0552 — isolatedEnsure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure one of 18 final sampled residents (Resident 43) reviewed for side rail use and unnecessary medication was provided the right to self-determination regarding the use of psychotropic medication (medications affecting brain activity) and side rails. * The facility failed to obtain the informed consent for side rail from Resident 43's responsible party when Resident 43 was deemed to not have the capacity to make medical decisions. In addition, the facility failed to ensure the informed consent was obtained from the responsible party and signed by the physician before administering alprazolam (antianxiety) medication for Resident 43. These failures posed the risk of Resident 43 and his responsible party not being informed not understanding risks and benefits of the treatments and medications. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Informed Consent revised 3/1/24, showed the following: - The facility…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-13 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to obtain and maintain a copy of the advance directives (a legal document stating a person's wishes about receiving medical care if the person is no longer able to make medical decisions) for six of 18 final sampled residents (Residents 8, 37, 43, 44, 320, and 669). * The facility failed to obtain a copy of advance directives for Residents 8, 37, 43, and 669. * The facility failed to obtain a copy of advance directives for Residents 44 and 320. In addition, the facility failed to ensure the POLSTs for Residents 44 and 320 were completed. These failures had the potential for the residents' decisions regarding their healthcare and treatment options to not be honored. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Advanced Directives revised date [DATE], showed in part, the facility will verify and/or modify the presence of advance directives or the resident's wishes with regard to CPR upon admission .each resident will receive…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-13 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolatedProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review and facility document review, the facility failed to provide an individualized and ongoing activity program to meet the needs and interests of one of one final sampled resident reviewed for activities (Resident 43). * The facility failed to provide activities for Resident 43 to meet the resident's identified interests. The facility only provided activity program to Resident 43 on 8/8, 8/9, and 8/18/24 since his admission on [DATE]. This failure had the potential for the resident to experience feelings of social isolation and frustration. Findings: On 9/10/24 at 0904 hours, during the initial tour of the facility, Resident 43 was observed in bed, awake, and staring at the ceiling. The TV was turned off, and there was no other in-room sensory stimulation observed. On 9/11/24 at 0941 and 1326 hours, and 9/12/24 at 0801, and 1008 hours, Resident 43 was observed in bed and awake. The TV was turned off, and there was no other in-room sensory stimulation observed.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-13 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review and facility P&P review, the facility failed to provide services to attain or maintain the highest practicable well-being for two of 18 final sampled residents (Residents 37 and 52) and one nonsampled resident (Resident 621). * LVN 3 failed to follow the physician's order to give furosemide (medication to treat fluid retention) 30 minutes before spironolactone-hydrochlorothiazide (medication to treat high blood pressure and fluid retention) to Resident 621. * Resident 37's physician's order was not followed when the physician was not notified of Resident 37's weight changes. * The licensed nurse failed to document the resident's BP when administered the as needed BP medication to evaluate the effectiveness of medication. These failures had the potential to compromise the health and safety of these residents. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Medication Administration revised 2/13/17, showed the nurse shall read and follow precautionary or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-13 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, facility document review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to provide the pharmaceutical services to ensure accurate reconciliation and disposal of medications. * The facility failed to ensure the removed controlled medications for Resident 31 was documented in the controlled drug record. * The facility failed to ensure the discontinued controlled medication for Resident 670 was removed from the current medication supply in Medication Cart B. These failures had the potential for drug diversion of the controlled medications, and potential for medication errors. Findings: According to Taylor's Fundamentals of Nursing, Seventh Edition, under Handling Controlled Substances Safely, a record must be kept for each narcotic that is administered. Healthcare agencies provide forms for keeping such records, and these forms are kept with the narcotics. Although the forms differ, the following information usually is required: name of the resident receiving…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-13 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and medical record review, the facility failed to ensure two of two final sampled residents (Residents 2 and 56) reviewed for unnecessary medications were free from unnecessary drugs. * The facility failed to ensure Resident 2's losartan potassium (medication used to lower high blood pressure) was administered as per the physician's ordered parameter. * The facility failed to ensure Resident 56's midodrine hydrochloride (medication used to treat low blood pressure) was administered as per the physician's ordered parameter. These failures had the potential for Residents 2 and 56 to receive unnecessary medications and develop significant side effects arising from errors in administration. Findings: 1. Medical record review for Resident 2 was initiated on 9/11/24. Resident 2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and readmitted on [DATE]. Review of Resident 2's Order Summary Report as of 9/11/24, showed an order dated 6/27/24 to administer losartan potassium 25 mg one tablet by mouth at bedtime…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-13 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure one of five final sampled residents reviewed for unnecessary medication (Resident 43) was free from unnecessary psychotropic drugs. * The facility failed to ensure the side effects were monitored for Resident 43 related to the use of alprazolam (antianxiety medication). This failure posed the potential to negatively impact the resident's well-being. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Use of Psychotropic Drugs revised date 11/13/23, showed the resident's response to the medication(s), including progress towards goals and presence/absence of adverse consequences, shall be documented in the resident's medical record. Medical record review for Resident 43 was initiated on 9/10/24. Resident 43 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident 43's Initial H&P evaluation dated 8/8/24, showed Resident 43 had no capacity to understand and make decisions. Review of Resident 43's Order Summary Report dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-13 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, medical record review, facility document review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to provide the necessary pharmacy services to ensure proper storage, labeling, and disposal of medications. * The facility failed to ensure the orally administered medications were stored separate from externally used medications. * The facility failed to ensure disinfectant wipes were stored separately from medications and treatment supplies. * The facility failed to ensure the medication bottle was kept clean and free of sticky residue. These failure posed the risk for cross-contamination of the medications. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Medication Storage dated 11/29/23, showed the following: -It is the policy of the facility to ensure all medications housed on our premises will be stored in the pharmacy and/ or medication rooms according to the manufacturer's recommendations and sufficient to ensure proper sanitation, temperature, light, ventilation, moisture control, segregation, and security. -External products: disinfectants and drugs…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-13 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolatedEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, facility document review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the pureed recipes were followed for three of 77 residents who received pureed food from the kitchen. * The facility failed to ensure the puree recipes for biscuit and rice were followed. This failure had a potential for not providing nutritional meals to meet the residents' needs. Findings: Review of the facility's census on 9/10/24, showed there were 77 residents at the facility. The facility document titled Diet Type Report for September 2024 showed the kitchen provided the diets to 75 residents in the facility. Further review of the Diet Type Report showed three of 75 residents receiving food prepared from the kitchen were on pureed diet. Review of the facility's P&P titled Meal/Tray Assembly Procedures revised 1/2024 showed meal service is prompt and accurate to ensure temperatures and nutrient content of food is preserved. Procedures showed to ensure current diet spreadsheet is available and followed at each meal period, checks meals for accuracy, and tastes the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-13 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolatedEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, facility document review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure four of 75 residents (Residents 17, 26, 39, and 65) who received food from the kitchen were palatable. * The facility failed to ensure Residents 17, 26, 39, and 65 received palatable green beans during dining observation. This failure had a potential for the residents not consuming the food and may experience weight loss. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Modified Texture Foods revised 1/2024 showed a standardized process for modified texture foods to meet community-approved diet guidelines and to assure palatability, flavor, texture, and nutritional value. Review of the facility's recipe titled [NAME] Beans Seasoned (Seasoned [NAME] Beans), undated, showed to steam vegetables until tender. Review of the International Dysphagia Diet Standardization Initiative (IDDSI) dated 7/2019, showed easy to chew texture is described as normal, everyday foods of soft/tender…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-13 · tag F0813 — isolatedHave a policy regarding use and storage of foods brought to residents by family and other visitors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, facility document review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the facility's P&P titled Use of Food Brought Into the Facility was updated to address the use and storage of foods brought to the residents by the family or visitors. In addition, the facility failed to ensure the visitors were educated on safe food handling of outside food. These failures had the potential to cause foodborne illnesses to the medically vulnerable resident population who consume food brought from outside sources. Findings: 1. Review of the CMS S&C-09-39 dated 5/29/09, showed the residents have the right to choose to accept food from visitors, family, friends, or other guests according to their rights to make choices. Review of the State regulations dated 2/3/23, showed the facility must have a policy regarding use and storage of foods brought to the residents by family and other visitors to ensure safe and sanitary storage, handling, and consumption. Review of the facility's P&P titled Use of Food Brought Into the Facility revised 7/2023 showed it is the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-09 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review, facility document review and facility P&P review, the facility failed to remove a staff (CNA 1) from resident care areas pending an alleged violation of abuse for one of two sampled residents (Resident 1) as per the facility's P&P. This failure had the potential to expose Resident 1 to abuse. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Reporting Allegations of Abuse/Neglect/Exploitation revised 10/21/22, showed under the Procedure for Response and Reporting Allegations of Abuse/Neglect/Exploitation section, when thereports of abuse/neglect/exploitation occur, the following procedure will be initiated: 1. The Licensed Nurse will: a. Respond to the needs of the resident and protect him/her from further incident. b. Remove the accused employee from resident care areas. 2. The Administrator or designee will: c. Suspend the accused employee pending completion of the investigation. Review of the facility's SOC 341 (a form to report suspected abuse) dated 4/8/24, showed the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-11-18 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to provide an environment free from accident hazards for one of 17 final sampled residents (Resident 10). * The facility failed to ensure safe smoking practice for Resident 10 who smoked in the facility. Resident 10 had her smoking materials in her possession when her care plan for safe smoking included the intervention for the activity staff to keep her lighter and the facility's smoking policy showed the smoking materials were to be maintained by staff. This failure posed the risk of fire and injury to the residents and staff in the facility. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Resident Smoking Policy revised 3/27/17, showed the smoking materials of residents will be maintained by staff. Review of Resident 10's medical record was initiated on 11/5/21. Resident 10 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and readmitted on [DATE]. Review of the MDS dated [DATE], showed Resident 10 was cognitively intact…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-11-18 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to provide the necessary care and services for the use of a GT for one of 17 final sampled residents (Resident 37). * The facility failed to ensure Resident 37 received the accurate amount of enteral feeding as ordered by the physician. In addition, the facility failed to accurately document Resident 37's amount of enteral feeding and water flushed via enteral pump. These failures had the potential for not meeting the resident's nutritional and hydration needs. Findings: According to the facility's P&P titled Tube Feeding,Naso-Gastric, Gastrostomy, Jejunostomy, via Enteral Pump revised on 7/8/21, showed it is the policy of the facility to properly monitor Naso-Gastric, Gastrostomy, Jejunostomy feedings to provide nourishment, administer medication, and to maintain hydration. Medical record review for Resident 37 was initiated on 11/15/21. Resident 37 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review if the MDS dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-11-18 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to provide the respiratory care needs to two of 17 final sampled residents (Residents 30 and 44). * The facility failed to ensure Resident 44's oxygen therapy titration (adjusting oxygen level) based on her oxygen saturation level (percentage of oxygen in the blood with normal levels of 95% and higher) was monitored and documented in the medical record. * The facility failed to ensure Resident 30's oxygen was administered as ordered by the physician. These failures had the potential to put the residents at risk for adverse effects of the improper care and administration of oxygen. Findings: According to the facility's P&P titled Oxygen Therapy [NAME] Oxygen revised on 5/8/2017, showed oxygen therapy is administered as ordered by the physician. The licensed nurses will set the oxygen flow rate as ordered. Documentation will include the date and time of oxygen in use, oxygen flow rate and device being use, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-11-18 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolatedEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, facility document review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the licensed nurses had the specific competencies and skill sets needed to care for the residents. * The facility failed to ensure a program was in place to check the competencies and skill sets of the licensed nurses at the facility upon hiring and ongoing basis. The DSD/IP 1, IP 2, LVNs 1, and 4 failed to demonstrate how to obtain the history of the volume of feeding and water flush via the enteral pump for Resident 37. This failure had the potential to put the residents at risk for care not provided in a safe and competent manner. Findings: According to the facility's P&P titled Competency Evaluation dated 4/1/19, showed it is the policy of the facility to evaluate each employee to assure appropriate competencies and skills for performing his or her job and to meet the needs of facility residents. Initial competency is evaluated during the orientation process. An employee remains on orientation until all competencies are verified. Subsequent and/or annual competency…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-11-18 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure safe medication storage was observed in two of eight medication carts (Treatment Cart 1 and IV Cart 1). * An expired central line (catheter that is placed into a large vein) dressing kit was observed in IV (intravenous) Cart 1. * An expired tube of Remedy cream (moisture barrier cream) was observed in Treatment Cart 1. These failures had the potential for the residents to be exposed to the expired medications. Findings: According to the facility's P&P titled Storage and Expiration dating of Medications, Biologicals, Syringes and Needles, the facility should ensure that medication and biological that have expired date on the label are stored separate from other medications until destroyed or returned to the pharmacy or supplier. 1. On 11/17/2021, at 0828 hours, during the inspection of IV Cart 1 with IP 2, a central line dressing kit with an expiration date of 10/31/21 was found in the middle drawer of the IV Cart 1. IP 2 verified the findings and stated the central line dressing kit should not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-11-18 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the proper infection control measures were implemented as evidenced by: * LVN 1 did not perform hand hygiene when preparing Resident 207's medications. * The facility failed to ensure aseptic technique was observed during the preparation of Resident 207's heparin (medication to prevent the formation of the blood clot) medication. LVN 1 did not disinfect the self-sealing rubber topper of the medication vial with an antimicrobial swab each time she attempted to withdraw the heparin medication. LVN 1 used the same needle and syringe multiple times to withdraw the medication from the heparin vial. These failures had the potential to result in the transmission of infection for the resident. Findings: 1. Review of the facility's P&P titled Hand Hygiene revised on 04/27/21, showed the staff will perform hand hygiene when indicated, using proper technique consistent with accepted standards of practice. On 10/16/21 at 0853 hours, a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-11-18 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the risks and benefits of influenza vaccination were reviewed with the resident for one of 17 final sampled residents (Resident 52) when Resident 52 refused the influenza vaccine. This failure had the potential for the resident not being informed of the benefits and risks of influenza vaccination to make an informed decision. Findings: Medical record review for Resident 52 was initiated on 11/17/21. Resident 52 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the History and Physical Examination dated 10/25/21, showed Resident 52 had the capacity to understand and make decision. Review of the Nursing admission assessment dated [DATE], showed Resident 52 refused the influenza vaccine. Further review of the medical record failed to show any documentation Resident 52 was provided education on the risks and benefits of influenza vaccine. On 11/17/21 at 1012 hours, a concurrent interview and medical record review was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · B2026-03-10 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — patternSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the documentation were accurate for one of four sampled residents (Resident 1).The skilled nursing documentation showed speech was clear for Resident 1 who was assessed based on MDS to have unclear speech- slurred or mumbled words. This failure posed a risk for the resident to not receive the appropriate care as the resident's record was inaccurate.Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Documentation in Medical Record revised on 8/23/23, showed the licensed staff and interdisciplinary team members shall document all assessments, observations, and services provided in the resident's medical record in accordance with state law and facility policy. The documentation shall be accurate, relevant, and complete, containing sufficient details about the residents' care and/or responses to care. Closed medical record review for Resident 1 was initiated on 3/9/26. Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE].…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · B2025-11-20 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — patternHonor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the residents' rights to make choices about daily routines were honored for two of three final sampled residents (Residents 45 and 66) reviewed for choices. * The facility staff entered Residents 45 and 66's room during early morning hours while the residents were sleeping. The staff turned on the residents' room lights and moved their wheelchairs in the room without informing the residents. This failure had the potential to not to accommodate the residents choice.Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Promoting /Maintaining Resident Dignity revised 11/12/23, showed it is the practice of the facility to protect and promote resident rights and treat each resident with respect and dignity as well as care for each resident in a manner and in an environment, that maintains or enhances residents' quality of life by recognizing each resident's individuality. Further review of the P&P showed as possible, the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2025-11-20 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to develop the comprehensive person-centered plan of care to reflect the individual care needs for one of 18 final sampled residents (Resident 11). * The facility failed to ensure the comprehensive person-centered care plan for the use of bed rails was in place for Resident 11. This failure had the potential to cause inconsistent, inappropriate, and inadequate plans of care for Resident 11.Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Bed Rails revised on 11/12/24, showed the facility will continue to provide necessary treatment and care for the residents who have bed rails in accordance with professional standards of practice and the residents' choices. This should be evidenced in the residents' records, including their care plan. On 9/22/25 at 0903 hours, during the initial tour, Resident 11 was observed sitting up on the wheelchair and verbally responsive. Resident 11's bed was observed with the bilateral…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · B2025-11-20 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — patternDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the comprehensive care plan was revised for one of 18 final sampled residents (Resident 10). * The facility failed to ensure Resident 10's comprehensive care plan was revised to reflect when the physician's order for the apixaban (used to treat and prevent blood clots) medication was resumed. This failure placed the resident at risk of not being provided with the appropriate, consistent, and individualized care.Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Comprehensive Care Plans revised 11/29/23, showed it is the policy of this facility to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with resident rights, that includes measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that are identified in the resident's comprehensive assessment. Qualified staff responsible for carrying out interventions specified in the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2025-11-20 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, facility document review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the food item served for two nonsampled residents (Residents 33 and 96) was palatable. * Residents 33 and 96 were served with dry shrimp scampi. This posed the risk of Residents 33 and 96 for decreased meal intake, which may contribute to inadequate nutrition and negatively impact their well-being. Findings: 1. Review of the facility's P&P titled Meal Quality and Temperature revised 1/2025 showed the food and drinks are palatable, attractive, and served at a safe and appetizing temperature to ensure resident satisfaction and to meet nutrition and hydration needs. Review of the facility's document titled 2025 Spring/Summer - Week 3 Service for 9/22/25, showed the lunch menu for Monday 9/22/25, included soup bean navy, shellfish shrimp scampi, white rice, broccoli lemon, and blueberry pie. Review of the facility's document titled Shellfish Shrimp Scampi (Shrimp Scampi) recipe showed to use 11 pounds…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2024-11-07 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the appropriate infection control practices designed to provide a safe and sanitary environment and help prevent the development and transmission of infections were implemented. * The facility failed to ensure the CNAs followed the EBP to wear not only gloves but also a gown when providing resident care. This failure posed the risk for the transmission of disease-causing microorganisms. Findings: According to the CDC, for the EBP, expand the use of PPE and refer to the use of gown and gloves during high-contact resident care activities that provides opportunities for transfer of MDROs to staff hands and clothing. High-contact resident care activities requiring gown and gloves for EBP includes transferring the resident. Review of the facility's P&P titled Enhanced Barrier Precautions revised 5/2024 showed refer to the use of gown and gloves for certain residents during specific high-contact resident care activities that have been found for increased risk for transmission of multidrug-resistant…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · B2024-09-13 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — patternKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the Director of Activities did not use her personal cell phone to take pictures of the residents during activities. This failure had the potential to negatively affect the dignity of the residents and violate privacy. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Resident photos revised on 4/19/24, showed the residents have a right to privacy and confidentiality, including through photographs, videos, and digital recordings. The Policy Explanation and Compliance Guideline shows permission will be obtained by the resident and/or resident representative prior to photographs taken during facility events, activities, gatherings, etc. Review of the facility's P&P titled Resident Photos revised on 4/5/24, showed it is the policy of this facility to ensure proper use of technology. The Policy Explanation and Compliance Guideline shows the following: 1. Employees should not use their personal cell phone while on the clock. 2. Personal cell phones may be used during meal or rest breaks. On 9/12/24 at 1641…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · B2021-11-18 · tag F0574 — patternThe resident has the right to receive notices in a format and a language he or she understands.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure four of seven residents interviewed (Residents 15, 36, 207, and 208) knew how to contact the state long-term care ombudsman (an official who investigates, reports and help settle complaints). This posed the risk of residents not knowing how to contact the ombudsman should the residents require the ombudsman's services. Findings: On 11/16/21 at 1350 hours, the resident council meeting (a group or residents or residents' family members that meets regularly to discuss and offer suggestions about facility policies and procedures) was conducted with seven residents. The residents were asked if they knew how to contact the ombudsman or if they knew where the ombudsman's contact information was posted. Residents 15, 36, 207, and 208 stated they did not know how to contact the ombudsman. On 11/16/21 at 1500 hours, an interview and concurrent record review was conducted with the Administrator. When asked about the process on how the residents were informed about the ombudsman and their contact…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2021-11-18 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and medical record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for one of 17 final sampled residents (Resident 205). *The facility failed to develop a care plan to address Resident 205's use of continuous oxygen. This failure had the potential to negatively impact the care needed for the residents. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Comprehensive Care Plans revised on 9/25/19, showed it is the policy of the facility to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with resident rights, that includes measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that are identified in the resident's comprehensive assessment. Findings: On 11/15/21 at 0758 hours, during the initial tour, Resident 205 was observed asleep in bed with continuous oxygen at 2 liters per minute. Medical record review for Resident 205 was initiated on 11/15/21.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to THE CHRISTIAN AND MISSIONARY ALLIANCE — 2 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes:
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 5 of 5 | 4.5 | +0.5 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 3 of 5 | 3.0 | ≈ chain avg |
| Staffing | 5 of 5 | 5.0 | ≈ chain avg |
| Quality measures | 5 of 5 | 3.5 | +1.5 vs chain |
The other 1 home this chain runs (chain average 4.5★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOWN AND COUNTRY MANOR CHRISTIAN & MISSIONARY ALLIANCE | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | 100% | since 09/17/1976 |
| THE CHRISTIAN AND MISSIONARY ALLIANCE | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 09/17/1976 |
| ADAMS, JOHN | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 09/22/2024 |
| BALDES, KEN | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 04/01/2021 |
| BOLLINS, ROD | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 09/01/2007 |
| CROWNOVER, KEITH | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 04/01/2022 |
| ELLIS, ROBERT | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 09/01/2015 |
| GERLACH, MATTHEW | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 01/01/2022 |
| KIRK, WILFORD | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 04/01/2022 |
| LAMENDOLA, JOSEPH | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 01/01/2015 |
| MORELAND, DAVID | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 01/01/2015 |
| WALKER, KARI | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 04/01/2017 |
| WOLFF, AARON | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 04/01/2018 |
| YI, ROBERT | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 01/01/2013 |
| GOERZEN, ROBERT | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 08/23/2021 |
| KOLB, GINA | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2013 |
| GLASGOW, GORDON | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 05/01/1983 |
| HOLT, PAT | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 02/11/2023 |
| MELENDEZ, MIRAN | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 10/02/2000 |
| PRECIADO, MARISSA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 08/16/2016 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 29 rows in the source record cover these 20 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in CA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 555141. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-11-20, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.