Mission Park Healthcare Center
623 West Junipero Street, Santa Barbara, CA 93105 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 138 certified beds · (805) 682-7443 Medicare only — no Medicaid
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- a strong health-inspection score (5/5) — the hardest rating to game (though it’s ranked within its own state, not nationally)
- no harm-level citations in the current inspection record
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited May 2024
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 5 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 3 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 4 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 4 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 5 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 12.8% | 10.2% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 5.7% | 4.0% | 5.4% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.5% | 0.8% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.9% | 1.2% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 1.5% | 7.3% | 6.5% | better |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.4% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 2.8% | 1.6% | 3.3% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 13.0% | 9.8% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 11.4% | 13.7% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 98.2% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 4.2% | 4.3% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 21.6% | 10.2% | 21.2% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 25.5% | 12.0% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 1.7% | 1.5% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 93.9% | 93.2% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 22.9% | 23.0% | 22.6% | typical |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 12.9% | 11.2% | 12.0% | typical |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.48 | 2.25 | 1.67 | better |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.46 | 1.57 | 1.80 | better |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
66.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 684 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 71.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 246 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.60 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 88% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 33% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 66.7%CMS range 63.8–70.0 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | better than U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.0%CMS range 8.0–11.6 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 71.5% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 64.6% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 66.3% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 99.3% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 98.1% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 98.2% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 2.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 6.5%CMS range 4.3–9.2 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.99 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 138 beds and averages 127.1 residents a day — about 92% occupied, or roughly 11 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.77 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.27 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.10 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.25 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.98 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.30 to 0.21 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 42% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
14 citations, most serious first — scroll within the box to see all.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-11 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure an incident report was completed and a post-fall assessment and investigation was completed after 1 (Resident #1) of 1 sampled resident reviewed for accidents sustained a fall. Findings included: A facility policy titled, Fall Risk Assessment, dated 10/01/2023, indicated C. An episode where a resident lost his/her balance and would have fallen, if not for staff intervention or the if the resident caught themselves, is considered a fall. D. A fall without injury is still a fall. A facility policy titled, Fall Management Program, dated 10/01/2023, indicated IV. Post-Fall A. Following a resident's fall, the licensed nurse will complete an incident report and a Post-Fall Assessment & Investigation within 24 hours or as soon as practicable. B. The Licensed Nurse will review the circumstances of the fall, review the plan of care, implement new interventions as appropriate, and revise the plan as indicated. An admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident #103 on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-11 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure pain medication was available for administration for 1 (Resident #267) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for pain management. Findings included: A facility policy titled, Ordering and Receiving Controlled Medications, dated 01/2020, indicated, Medications included in the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) classification as controlled substances, and medications classified as controlled substances by stated law, are subject to special ordering, receipt, and record keeping requirements in the nursing care center in accordance with federal and state laws and regulations. The nursing care center obtains and keeps current and on file any permits require by state agencies. The policy specified, If only one refill remains or only a partial fill quantity remains, the pharmacy will simultaneously dispense the remaining fill, and, if necessary proactively seek out a new, complete prescription form the prescriber for a new…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-25 · tag F0553 — failed to let residents help plan their care — isolatedAllow resident to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure resident ' s representative (RR) was invited and included in the formulation of a person-centered baseline care plan (CP -implementation of care plan goals and interventions) that was to be done within 48 hours of resident ' s admission when the facility discussed the initial plan of care to one of two cognitively impaired (problems with ability to think, learn and remember) sampled residents (Resident 1). This failure resulted in RR being uninformed and was not given at the opportunity to participate in making decisions for Resident 1 ' s initial plan of care, treatment, and healthcare goals that could affect Resident 1 ' s care and quality of life. Findings: During a review of the facility ' s policy and procedure (P&P), titled, Care Planning, dated 10/2023, the P&P indicated, in part, I. The facility will develop a person-centered Baseline Care Plan for each resident within 48 hours of admission .A. The facility will invite the resident, if capable, and their family to the care planning meetings and use its best…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-25 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide resident or the resident ' s representative (RR) a summary of the baseline care plan (initial plan of care) for one of two sampled residents ' (Resident 1). This failure resulted in RR to have no knowledge of the initial care plan goals and interventions being provided to Resident 1. Findings: During a review of the facility ' s policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Care Planning, dated 10/2023, the P&P indicated, in part . I. The facility will develop a person-centered Baseline Care Plan for each resident within 48 hours of admission .Once the Baseline Care Plan is completed, the Facility must provide the resident and /or the resident ' s representative with a written summary of the Baseline Care Plan that includes: A. Initial goals based on admission orders. B. Physician ' s orders. C. Dietary orders. D. Therapy Services. E. Social services. F. PASARR recommendations, if applicable .The medical record must contain evidence that the summary was given to the resident and/or resident ' s representative. During a review…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-14 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to keep one of three residents (Resident 1) free from abuse when the resident was the victim of sexual abuse by Resident 2. This failure resulted in psychosocial harm to Resident 1 and had the potential to result in harm to other female residents. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's Medical Record, the Medical Record indicated, Resident 1 had diagnoses that included, anxiety disorder (persistent and excessive worry and fear) and aftercare following joint replacement surgery. Further review shows, Resident 1 had decision making capacity. During an interview on 4/2/2024 at 9:55 a.m. with Resident 1, Resident 1 explained that when she was in the hallway, Resident 2 approached her and asked about the cast on her leg. Resident 1 stated, I said it's a cast and it's very heavy. He asked if he could touch it, and I said yes, and he reached down and touched it and within a second, he reached up and grabbed my right breast, and I said no you can't do that! He said please let me touch you, and I said no you can't do…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-14 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to report sexual abuse within two hours per regulation and their abuse policy and procedure when one of three residents (Resident 3) was the victim of sexual abuse by Resident 2. This failure had the potential to result in further harm to Resident 3 and harm to other female residents. Findings: During a review of the facility'ss policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Abuse Prevention and Prohibition Program, dated October 1, 2023, the P&P indicated, IX. Special Considerations for Reporting Suspected Incidents of Criminal Sexual Abuse A. Anyone who suspects that criminal sexual abuse has been committed against a resident must immediately report this information to Administrator and to the Director of Nursing Services. i. The Facility will treat allegations as criminal sexual abuse wherein the Facility determines that the resident does not have the decision-making capacity to consent to the sexual act. B. The Director of Nursing Services or designee will immediately report this information to the Attending Physician. C. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-18 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, and interview, the facility failed to adhere to their medication administration policy and procedures, for two of two sampled Residents (Resident 1 and Resident 2). This facility failure had the potential for both residents to experience negative outcomes. Findings: During a review of Resident 1 ' s Order Summary Report undated, indicated in part, Resident 1 had an order for Metoprolol Tartrate (a medication used to treat high blood pressure, referred to as hypertension). The order read Metoprolol Tartrate Oral Tablet 25 MG (milligrams) Give 25 mg by mouth one time a day for HTN (Hypertension > high blood presure) Hold if SBP (systolic blood pressure) less than 110 and HR (heart rate) less than 55 (55 heart beats per minute). During a concurrent record review, and interview, on 4/9/24 at 2:52 p.m., with Licensed Nurse LN 2, and the Director of Nursing (DON), Resident 1 ' s Medication Administration Record (MAR) indicated, from 12/23 through 1/24, Resident 1 received the medication Metoprolol Tartrate on 12/22/23, 12/25/23, 12/26/23, 12/27/23, 12/28/23,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-02 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow a physician's order for treatment and care as ordered for one of two sampled residents (Resident 1). This failure had the potential to result in increased swelling and complications to Resident 1's affected elbow. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission physician office note dated 09/08/2023, Resident 1 was admitted to the facility for 10 days for respite care (provides short-term relief for primary caregivers). During a review of Resident 1's nurses notes dated 09/08/23, this indicated Resident 1 was alert to self only with episodes of confusion with redirection from staff. During a review of Resident 1's physician office visit note dated 09/08/23, Resident 1 had left elbow bursitis (a painful swelling, usually around your joints) and to compress Resident 1's elbow with an ACE Bandage (a stretchable bandage that provides a gentle pressure that helps reduce swelling) or compression sleeve (applies a therapeutic compression to the elbow joint to improve blood flow and promote healing of elbow injuries).…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-29 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a person centered careplan was developed and implemented for one of two residents (Resident 1) per the facility's policy and procedure regarding a physician order (PO) to monitor and record Intake and Output (Intake refers to the number of fluids the client ingests, and output refers to the amount of fluids that leave the body) every shift for Foley catheter ( FC- rubberized tube inserted into the bladder for urine passage) use. This failure has the potential to not have a plan in place on how to care and direct staff in managing the resident's bodily input and output which can either result to urine retention detrimental to the resident's overall health. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's medical record titled face sheet(a document that gives a patient's information at a quick glance) indicated, an admission date of 11/1/23 with diagnoses that included Hypotension (Low blood pressure) Heart Failure (occurs when the heart muscle doesn't pump blood as well as it should) Chronic Kidney Disease ( condition in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-18 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision for one of two sampled residents (Resident 1), when Resident 1 eloped (a situation in which a resident with impaired cognition or poor safety awareness or judgment successfully leaves the facility undetected or unsupervised by staff) across a street, on two separate occasions. This facility failure had the potential for Resident 1 to suffer negative outcomes. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Record undated, indicated in part, Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including dementia, history of falling, mild cognitive impairment, muscle weakness and other abnormalities of gait and mobility. During a review of Resident 1's care plan, undated, indicated in part Resident 1 was a High Elopement Risk related to Cognitive impairment, exit seeking behaviors, ability to move around independently in wheelchair. Resident 1's care plan further indicated Resident 1 had actual elopement from…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-11 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to implement one of two sample residents' (Resident 1's) care plan. This facility failure resulted in Resident 1 crying, verbalizing feeling depressed, expressing suicidal ideations, and delayed psychiatry services for possible medication regime adjustments. Findings: During a review of the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Comprehensive Plan of Care, dated 12/16, the P&P indicated, The comprehensive care plan must describe services that are provided to the resident to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. During a review of Resident 1's care plan titled, [Name] has a psychosocial well-being problem r/t suicidal ideation, initiated on 7/11/23, the care plan indicated in the Interventions part, Consult with . Psych services, Other: During a concurrent observation and interview, on 7/19/23, at 2:30 p.m., with Resident 1, in the facility, the resident started crying…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-11 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to notify the Physician of a change of condition (COC) for one of two sampled residents (Resident 1), when resident expressed suicidal ideations, continued exhibiting symptoms of depression, i.e., continuously crying, as per standards of practice and their policy and procedure (P&P). This facility failure resulted in resident suffering psychologically as evidence by crying, verbalizing feeling depressed, expressing suicidal ideations and a delay in psychiatry services for possible medication regime adjustments. Findings: According to the Standards of Competent Performance, California Code of Regulations, Title 16, Section 1443.5 (5): A registered nurse (RN) shall be considered to be competent when he/she consistently demonstrates the ability to transfer scientific knowledge from social, biological and physical sciences in applying the nursing process, as follows: · evaluate the effectiveness of the care plan through observation of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-01-21 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure an accurate system for monitoring the effectiveness of nutrition interventions in order to have the ability to identify and evaluate when to revise as necessary, and for comparison of nutrition intake to the assessed daily nutrition needs, per facility policy and procedure, for one of 14 sampled residents (Resident 53). This failure had the potential to result in inaccurate nutrition assessment and potential delay in identifying and evaluating the necessity of an alternative nutrition approach. Findings: During a review of the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Nutrition Assessment, dated January 2022, the P&P indicated, The resident will be seen in a timely manner, assessed and a plan put in place to identify and address nutritional concerns. Procedure 3. Comprehensive Nutrition Assessment d. Determine calorie, protein and fluids needs, compare to food/fluid intake . During a concurrent observation and interview on 01/19/22, at 11:40 a.m., inside Resident 53's room, Resident 53 was eating…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-05-02 · tag F0640 — isolatedEncode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a completed Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool) were transmitted timely per regulation for one sampled resident (Resident 6) and four un-sampled residents (Residents 4, 5, 7 and 36). This failure resulted in the facility's non-compliance with the regulatory requirements and with the potential for records unaccountability of resident's whereabouts and current conditions. Findings: A review of facility MDS transmittal records was condcuted on 5/2/19 and the following were noted. -Resident 4 was discharged on 11/17/18 and the MDS assessment for discharge was completed on 11/29/18. -Resident 5 was discharged on 12/3/18 and the MDS assessment was completed on 12/17/18. -Resident 6's quarterly assessment was completed on 3/18/19. -Resident 7 was discharged on 1/29/19 and MDS assessment was completed on 2/1/19. -Resident 36's significant change of condition assessment was completed on 3/28/19. On 5/2/19 all five assessments were found not transmitted to the federal database and pass the 14 days requirement for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AHM TRUST | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | 100% | since 08/09/2021 |
| MAYER, AARON | Individual | DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 08/09/2021 |
| THE COMPLIANCE INSTITUTE LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 07/03/2023 |
| KEAWEKANE, SCOTT | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 07/11/2022 |
| LARSON, QUINN | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 11/11/2024 |
| MURDOCH, JAMES | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/02/2023 |
| 623 W. JUNIPERO, LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 08/09/2021 |
| MAYER PP ASSOCIATES, LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 08/09/2021 |
| PACIFICARE HEALTH MANAGEMENT LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 08/09/2021 |
| MAYER, HELENE | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 08/09/2021 |
| MAYER, RONALD | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 08/09/2021 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 17 rows in the source record cover these 11 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
5 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $3.1M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 16% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in CA
CMS lists this home as Medicare-certified only — it is not Medicaid-certified, so it generally cannot accept Medicaid as payment for a long-term stay. That makes it one of roughly 545 homes nationally where a Medicaid-funded placement is not an option. If you expect to rely on Medicaid, ask the home directly before you tour, and see the California Medicaid page for homes that do.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 055991. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2024-12-11, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.