The Californian

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

66.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 219 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 77.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 95 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.20 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 23% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 9% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 68 beds and averages 48.2 residents a day — about 71% occupied, or roughly 20 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.36 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.51 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.71 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.71 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.62 on weekdays — 20% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.59 to 0.30 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 60% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

15 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 5 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-28 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop a care plan for the use of the anticoagulant medication Apixaban (a medication that helps prevent blood clots) for one of two sampled residents (Resident 39). This failure could result in medication related adverse events and poor management of anticoagulation therapy for Resident 39. Findings: During a review of Resident 39's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated, Resident 39 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included congestive heart failure (heart muscle doesn't pump blood as well as it should) and presence of cardiac pacemaker (a device implanted in the body to deliver electrical pulses to your heart). During a concurrent interview and record review on 3/28/25 at 9:36 a.m. with the Minimum Data Set Coordinator (MDSC), Resident 39's electronic clinical record was reviewed. Review of Resident 39's Order Summary Report (OSR), dated 3/2025, the OSR indicated, a physician order for the medication Apixaban oral tablet 5mg (milligrams)…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-28 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure physician orders were followed for two of two unsampled residents (Residents 29 and 14) when: 1. Resident 29's apical pulse (AP - heartbeat that is felt or heard at the apex [top] of the heart, located on the left side of the chest) rate was not checked, as ordered, prior to receiving a blood pressure medication. 2. Resident 14's medical record had no documented intervention, as ordered, during two episodes when the resident had alarmingly low blood sugar readings. These failures had the potential to result in Resident 29 and 14 not receiving the appropriate care and services which can affect their health and safety. Findings: 1. During a review of Resident 29's, admission Record (AR), dated 4/28/23, the AR indicated in part, Resident 29 is a [AGE] year-old male who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with admission diagnoses including essential hypertension (high blood pressure), paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (fluttering of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-28 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure oxygen tubing for one of two sampled residents (Resident 98) was labeled and dated. This failure had the potential to result in cross-contamination (the transfer of harmful bacteria) for residents in an already compromised condition. Findings: During review of Resident 98's admission Record (AD), the AD indicated Resident 98 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD - a chronic lung disease causing difficulty in breathing) and dependence on supplemental oxygen. During a concurrent observation and interview on 3/25/25 at 11:45 a.m., with the Infection Preventionist (IP) in Resident 98's room, Resident 98 was observed wearing a nasal cannula (a small plastic tube, which fits into the person's nostrils for providing supplemental oxygen) connected to an oxygen concentrator (a medical device used to deliver oxygen) without a label on the nasal cannula tubing. IP stated Resident 98's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-28 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, record review, the facility failed to ensure kitchen and food storage sanitation was maintained when: 1. Kitchen staff personal belongings (i.e., jacket and purse) were found inside the dry food storage room. 2. The low-temperature dish machine was operating without proper chemical sanitation. These failures increased the risk of food-borne illnesses to its vulnerable residents as a result of potential food contamination and improperly sanitized dishware. Findings: 1. During a concurrent observation and interview on 3/25/25 at 9:34 a.m., inside the facility's dry food storage room, with dietary staff (DS) 1, staff personal belongings including a jacket and a purse, were found inside a bin located in one of the lower storage racks. DS 1 verbalized that staff personal belongings should not be stored in any of the food storage areas. During a review of the facility's policy and procedures (P&P) titled, Section F: Safety and Sanitation .1. Employee Responsibility for Safety, undated, the P&P indicated in part, Procedure .22) Employees are not allowed to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-01-12 · tag F0640 — isolated
  Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the completed MDS (Minimum Data Set - a federally mandated health status screening and assessment tool used for all residents of long-term care health facilities) discharge assessments for two of two sampled residents (Residents 11 and 33) were submitted in a timely manner. This failure had the potential to result in resident data inaccuracies which could affect the facility's improvement efforts to provide high quality care to its residents. Findings: During a review of the Long-Term Care Survey Process (LTCSP - a computer application that supports the survey process for long-term care facilities) final sampling process, the non-mandatory facility task, Resident Assessment, was triggered. Residents 11 and 33 were triggered under this task for investigation of MDS records over 120 days old. During a review of Resident 11's Electronic Health Record (EHR), the admission Record (AR), dated 1/11/24, indicate in part, Resident 11 was an [AGE]…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-12 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to: 1. Develop a person-centered interdisciplinary team nutrition care plan (IDTNCP - detailed plans of care created by representatives from several medical disciplines or specialties) for one of 16 sampled residents (Resident 37) to include the resident's goals and desired outcomes. In addition, the IDTNCP lacked clear and specific measurable objectives and physician input, related to a planned weight gain for Resident 37. This failure resulted in unclear measurable weight gain goal and impedes the IDT from effectively monitoring, evaluating and revising the care plan, as appropriate, to ensure care needs would not go unrecognized and unmet. 2. Develop a care plan for one of 16 sampled residents (Resident 35) receiving blood thinners. This failure had the potential to result in medication adverse consequences to not be monitored. Findings: 1. During a concurrent interview and record review on 1/10/24 at 11 a.m. with Registered Dietitian…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-01-12 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to obtain and provide a prescribed, routine antihypertensive medication (a medication used to lower blood pressure) ordered for one of three sampled residents (Resident 40). This failure had the potential to result in uncontrolled blood pressure levels and subsequent complications for Resident 40. Findings: During a medication pass observation on 1/10/24 at 9:18 a.m. with a licensed nurse (LN 4), Resident 40's Losartan Potassium (a medication to treat high blood pressure) scheduled to be administered for 9 a.m. was not available in the medication cart. During a concurrent interview and record review on 1/10/24 at 11:11 a.m. with LN 4, LN 4 stated, This resident (referring to Resident 40) just transitioned from short-term to long-term care ( short stay to long stay in the facility). The pharmacy does not auto refill ( automatic dispensing) medications for short term residents, only for long term. LN 4 verbalized the medication was reordered…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-01-12 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
  Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the facility's Consultant Pharmacist (CP) identified and reported irregularities during the medication regimen review (MRR) when nonpharmacological interventions (NPI) were not implemented for the behaviors exhibited for depression and psychosis for one of 16 sampled residents (Resident 34) This failure had the potential to result in Resident 34 receiving unnecessary medications. Findings: During a review of Resident 34's, Medication Administration Record (MAR), dated 1/1-1/31/24, the MAR indicated the following medication orders: Seroquel Oral Tablet (Quetiapine Fumarate), give 37.5 mg (milligram) by mouth one time a day for psychosis, manifested by aggressive behavior at 4 p.m. (start date: 12/9/23), Seroquel Oral Tablet (Quetiapine Fumarate) Give 12.5 mg by mouth one time a day for psychosis, manifested by aggressive behavior at 9 am (start date: 1/4/24), and Fluoxetine HCl (Prozac) capsule 20 mg, give one capsule by mouth one time a day for depression with anxiety manifested by demonstrating restlessness as…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-01-12 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
  Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure its medication error rate during medication pass observation was less than five percent (5%). The facility had a cumulative medication error rate of 10.34% when three errors out of 29 opportunities for errors were observed between two licensed nurses (LN 2 and LN 4) who administered medication to two sampled residents (Residents 25 & 40) and one unsampled resident (Resident 547). The observed medication administration errors were: 1. LN 4 administered one capsule of Urox (a medication that supports bladder control) by mouth to Resident 25 instead of the prescribed order of two capsules. 2. LN 2 failed to administer the full dose of Clearlax (a laxative to treat occasional constipation) mixed in apple juice to Resident 547 when half of the mixture was thrown away. 3. LN 4 administered one puff of Tiotropium Bromide Monnohydrate (Spiriva - an inhaled medication that relaxes and opens the air passages of the lungs) to Resident 40 instead of the prescribed two puffs. These failures had the potential to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-12 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure expired medications and medical supplies were discarded and not readily available for staff use. This failure had the potential to result in unsafe medication administration or ineffective therapy provided to the residents. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 1/9/24 at 11:09 a.m. in the facility's medication storage room with a licensed nurse (LN 2), the following expired medications were found: six Nicotine Transdermal System patches (expired 8/23), one bottle Slow Magnesium Chloride with Calcium tablets (expired 11/23), one bottle of Calcium Citrate plus Vitamin D3 tablets (expired 11/23), and one refrigerated E-Kit (expired 10/23). LN 2 verified the expired medications found and acknowledged they should have been removed from storage and discarded. During a concurrent observation and interview on 1/9/24 at 11:34 a.m. with LN 2, the facility's treatment cart located in nurse station 2 was inspected. The following expired items were found in the cart: two boxes of Povidone…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 6 rows in the source record cover these 3 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CA