Valley Oaks Post Acute
830 East Chapel Street, Santa Maria, CA 93454 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 59 certified beds · (805) 922-6657 Medicare & Medicaid certified
The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.
- a strong health-inspection score (4/5) — the hardest rating to game (though it’s ranked within its own state, not nationally)
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0567)
- a high number of inspection citations overall (33) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 4 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 3 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 3 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 4 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 9.8% | 10.2% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 4.3% | 4.0% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 1.2% | 0.8% | 0.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.8% | 1.2% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 12.7% | 7.3% | 6.5% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.4% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 4.4% | 1.6% | 3.3% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 11.6% | 9.8% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 18.5% | 13.7% | 18.9% | typical |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 98.2% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 6.1% | 4.3% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 13.9% | 10.2% | 21.2% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 11.9% | 12.0% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.0% | 1.5% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 96.5% | 93.2% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 25.7% | 23.0% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 23.2% | 11.2% | 12.0% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 2.58 | 2.25 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 2.46 | 1.57 | 1.80 | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
54.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 221 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 72.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 93 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.49 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 80% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 28% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 54.9%CMS range 48.8–61.2 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 12.6%CMS range 9.3–16.1 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 72.0% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 63.4% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 59.1% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 98.6% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 100.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.7% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.7% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 9.2%CMS range 5.8–12.8 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.15 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 59 beds and averages 50.9 residents a day — about 86% occupied, or roughly 8 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.31 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.70 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.75 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.57 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.61 on weekdays — 23% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.87 to 0.30 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
33 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 23 are one tap away and print in full.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-30 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, record review, and facility policy and procedure review, the facility failed to ensure the accurate reconciliation, documentation, and accountability of controlled medications for one of two sampled residents (Resident 1). This failure resulted in the loss and potential diversion of 30 controlled -substance tablets. During a review of the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Drug Diversion Policy and Procedure, undated, the P&P indicated, controlled substance counts shall be completed at every shift change by two licensed nurses. Any medication discrepancy shall be reported immediately.During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (AR), dated 7/9/26, the AR indicated, Resident 1 was admitted in the facility on 4/24/26 with diagnoses including Palliative care (focuses on easing pain, stress, and heavy symptoms from a serious illness), chronic pain syndrome, and dementia (decline in mental abilities severe enough to interfere with daily life).During a review of Resident 1's Order Summary (OS), dated 5/11/26, the OS indicated, Oxycodone - Acetaminophen…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-12 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — patternEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure staff provided resident care and services in accordance with professional standards of nursing practice when physician medication orders and instructions were not followed for three of six sampled residents (Residents 13, 6, and 3).These failures had the potential to result in unsafe nursing care practices which could compromise the health and safety of these residents.Findings:1. During a review of Resident 13's admission Record (AR), dated 2/11/26, the AR indicated, Resident 13 is an [AGE] year-old female who was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD - a common lung disease causing restricted airflow and breathing problems), Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation (irregular heart rhythm), presence of a pacemaker (a small, battery-powered device that prevents the heart from beating too slow), and Essential Hypertension [HTN - high blood pressure (BP)].During a review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-12 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolatedKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure identifiable information was secured and kept confidential when: one resident (Resident 51) patient identification sticker was left unattended on top of the locked medication cart. This failure had the potential to result in unauthorized access to protected health information (PHI) and a violation of the resident's right to privacy and confidentiality. During observation on 2/10/26 at 6:18 a.m. of [NAME] medication cart. One patient identification label on top of medication cart left unattended.During an interview on 2/10/26 at 7:14 a.m. with Charge Nurse. Charge nurse stated patient identification label should not be left unattended on cart.During a review of facility's Policy and Procedure (P&P) titled, HIPPAA Compliance, dated 9/30/13. P&P indicated the facility will adopt guidelines and procedures that are compliant with the [Omnibus Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act] HIPPAA Privacy and Security Rules and other related HIPPAA rules and the practices established by the rule as…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-12 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to develop an individualized comprehensive care plans for two of four sampled residents (Residents 9 and 40) when: Resident 9 did not have an initial care plan addressing the use of Trazodone (a medication used to treat anti depressive disorder).Resident 40 did not have a care plan in place for Sacro coccyx pressure injury. These failures had the potential to affect residents' health and safety by not providing staff with appropriate guidance to meet identified needs. Findings: 1. During a review of Resident 9's admission Record (AR) dated 2/11/26, the AR indicated that Resident 9 is a [AGE] year-old male who was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses: Moderate Protein-Calorie Malnutrition (a state of nutritional deficiency characterized by 5-10% weight loss in 6 months, BMI of 17.9-18.9, or 70-80% of ideal body weight); Dementia (progressive decline in cognitive function); Alcohol Dependence (a chronic condition where…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-12 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that medications were stored in a sanitary manner and separated from non-medication and food items when: The facility failed to remove two unidentified and unlabeled medication tablets found in one of two medication carts (West Cart). 2. The facility failed to remove two open syringes from medication cart. 3. The facility failed to remove one open containers of pudding from the medication cart. 4. The facility failed to maintain original pharmacy packaging for one resident (Resident 64) when combined two syringes of Enoxaparin (a medication that treats of prevents blood clots) 40 mg (milligram)/0.4 ml (milliliter), expires on 03/2028 in same bag as four syringes of same medication expiring 8/2028. These failures had the potential to compromise resident safety and result in medication errors, cross-contamination, or the administration of adulterated or expired drugs. During an observation on 2/10/26 at 6:10 a.m. of one of two…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-09-09 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain accurate medical records for one resident (Resident 1) when it was documented a medication was administered when in fact the resident left the facility, and the medication was administered by an outside provider.This failure resulted in Resident 1's medication administration record (MAR) reflecting inaccurate documentation of prescribed medication.Findings:During a review of Resident 1's Medication Administration Record (MAR), dated 8/2/25 through 8/7/25 the MAR indicated, on 8/3/25 and 8/7/25 medication given.During a review of Resident 1's outside provider's Medication Dosing Log (MDL), dated 8/2/25 through 8/7/25 the MDL indicated, on 8/3/25 and 8/7/25 medication was administered at their facility.During an interview on 9/22/25 at 4:30 p.m. with Director of Nursing (DON), DON verbalized, the resident did not receive the medication in the facility, was receiving the medication from an outside provider.Review of [NAME] and [NAME], Tenth…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-03 · tag F0637 — isolatedAssess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to document a comprehensive nursing assessment for one of two residents sampled (Resident 1). This failure had the potential for the receiving facility not to have sufficient information necessary to develop and implement a plan of care to meet Resident 1's needs. Findings: During a concurrent interview and record review on 7/3/25 at 4:27 p.m. with Director of Nursing (DON), Resident 1's Nursing Progress Notes (NPN), dated 3/13/25 through 3/19/25 were reviewed. There was no evidence in the NPN that a comprehensive assessment was completed before Resident 1 was sent to the Emergency Department (ED) for coffee ground emesis (is a sign of upper gastrointestinal [GI] bleeding). DON stated there was no assessment documented and there should have been. Review of [NAME] and [NAME], Tenth Edition, Fundamentals of Nursing, page 365 in the section titled, Informatics and Documentation, indicated, Documentation is a key communication strategy that produces a written…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-02 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of three residents (Resident 1) received treatment for two pressure ulcers. This failure had the potential for the pressure ulcers to become worse and delay healing. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (AR), [undated], the AR indicated in part, Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including, pressure ulcer of sacral region (base of the spine) stage 4 (most severe stage of a bedsore that is an open wound with extensive tissue damage that extends to muscle, bone, tendon, or other supporting structures), pressure induced deep tissue damage of left heel (a severe form of pressure ulcer where the injury originates beneath the skin's surface with damage to underlying soft tissue), Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (the body cannot use insulin [a hormone which regulates the amount of glucose in the blood] correctly and sugar builds up in the blood), chronic kidney disease stage 4 (condition in which kidneys…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-02 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure assessments and notifications of change in conditions were completed for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) when: 1. A change in condition (COC) was not completed for Resident 1's right eye. 2. A post fall risk assessment was not completed. 3. Family was not notified of Resident 1's COCs. 4. Interdisciplinary Team (IDT) meeting was not conducted within 72 hours of Resident 1's COCs. These facility failures resulted Resident 1's medical record not reflecting accurate change in condition and assessment, family not notified of Resident 1's changes in conditions, hospice not notified of Resident 1's fall, delayed interdisciplinary team review of Resident 1's changes in conditions and had the potential for Resident 1 to not receive adequate care to meet Resident 1's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (AR), [undated], the AR indicated in part, Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-27 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of three residents (Resident 1) received quality care when Resident 1 was admitted to the facility with a diagnosis of Type 2 Diabetes ([DM2] a chronic condition when blood sugar levels are persistently high [hyperglycemia]) and continued to have high blood glucose levels. This failure resulted in Resident 1 being transferred to the hospital and had the potential to contribute to the resident's death the following morning. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's Face Sheet, the Face Sheet indicated, Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: DM2 with neuropathy (a type of nerve damage that can occur if you have diabetes), Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease ([COPD] lung disease causing restricted airflow and breathing problems), Pneumonia (an infection of the lungs), atherosclerotic heart disease (a buildup of fats, cholesterol and other substances in the arteries), chronic kidney disease (kidneys are…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 23 citations
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-12-19 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, facility policy review, and review of the United States (U.S.) Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 2022 Food Code, the facility failed to ensure dishware was allowed to air dry before being stacked in 1 of 1 facility kitchen. Stacking the dishes while still wet/damp had the potential to create an environment conducive to microbial growth, which could result in foodborne illness. The failed practice had the potential to affect all 51 residents who resided in the facility and received meals from the kitchen. Findings included: An undated facility policy titled Dishwashing indicated, Dishes are to be air dried in racks before stacking and storing. The U.S. FDA 2022 Food Code requirement for drying equipment and utensils indicated, Items must be allowed to drain and to air-dry before being stacked or stored. Stacking wet items such as pans prevents them from drying and may allow an environment where microorganisms can begin to grow. On 12/17/2024 at 10:10 AM, Dietary Aide #2 was observed to stack three visibly wet dessert bowls on a tray on top of each…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-12-19 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, records reviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure an evaluation for causative factors was conducted and documented after each fall to facilitate the ability to develop effective fall prevention interventions and failed to ensure accurate information about residents' falls was maintained for 2 (Resident #36 and Resident #25) of 2 sampled residents reviewed for accidents. Findings included: A facility policy titled, Fall Risk Assessment, revised 03/2018, indicated, 9. The staff and attending physician will collaborate to identify and address modifiable fall risk factors and interventions to try to minimize the consequences of risk factors that are not modifiable. A facility policy titled, Falls and Fall Risk, Managing, revised 03/2018, indicated, Based on previous evaluations and current data, the staff will identify interventions related to the resident's specific risks and causes to try to prevent resident from falling and to try to minimize…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-12-19 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — patternSet up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and facility document review, the facility failed to ensure the quality assessment and assurance (QAA) committee developed and implemented appropriate plans of action to correct and identify quality deficiencies related to evaluation, tracking, and documentation of falls to facilitate the ability to identify any patterns, determine causal factors, and enable the facility to ascertain whether appropriate and effective interventions were implemented for 2 (Resident #25 and Resident #36) of 2 residents reviewed for falls. Findings included: The facility's Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) Plan 2024, dated 01/2024, indicated, Feedback, Data Systems, and Monitoring a. Describe the overall system that will be put in place to monitor care and services, drawing data from multiple sources. The plan also specified several sources of data that would be monitored through QAPI, one of which was, Adverse events (incident reports, 24 hour report) and indicated that the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-19 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, record review, facility document review, facility policy review, and review of the Centers for Disease Prevention and Control (CDC) guidelines, the facility failed to ensure staff adhered to contact isolation precautions and donned the appropriate personal protective equipment while performing care or services in the room of a resident (Resident #26) with a known communicable disease (Clostridium difficile [C. diff]), to prevent the potential spread of C. diff infection to other residents. The failed practice was identified for 1 (Resident #26) of 1 resident reviewed for transmission-based precautions (TBP) and had the potential to affect 14 other residents who resided on the East Hall and were likely to receive care from staff assigned to Resident #26. Findings included: An undated facility policy titled, Standard and Other Precautions, indicated, Contact Precautions The following is adapted from CDC publication 2007 Guideline for Isolation Precautions: Preventing Transmission of Infections Agents in Healthcare Settings, which can be obtained at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-19 · tag F0567 — failed to protect residents' money held by the home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to manage his or her financial affairs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide residents with access to their personal funds on weekends for 1 (Resident #20) of 5 residents sampled for personal funds . Findings included: A facility policy titled, Deposit of Resident Funds, revised 03/2021, revealed 1. Should the resident permit the facility to hold, safeguard, and manage his or her personal funds, the facility will: c. provide the resident access to funds of fifty (50) dollars or less within twenty-four (24) hours, and access to funds in excess of fifty (50) dollars within three banking days. 2. Funds not on deposit in the resident's account are deposited into the resident petty cash fund managed by the facility on behalf of the residents. The State Operations Manual (SOM) Appendix PP - Guidance to Surveyors for Long Term Care Facilities guidance at tag F567 indicated, Resident requests for access to their funds should be honored by facility staff as soon as possible but no later than: - The same day for amounts less than $100.00 ($50.00 for Medicaid residents); -…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-19 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to submit the findings of an alleged abuse investigation to the State Survey Agency (Department) within five working days of the incident. This failure had the potential to compromise resident's health and safety, and delay necessary actions to protect residents from abuse. Findings: Review of a facility report incident (FRI) submitted by the facility to the Department dated 9/30/24, indicated, an alleged abuse incident involving two residents, (Residents 1 and 2) that occurred on 9/29/24 at 5:30 p.m. The FRI indicated, [Resident 2] was yelling because [Resident 1] was in his bed. [Resident 1] kicked at [Resident 2] and made contact with his leg. During an interview on 9/30/24 at 3:22 p.m. with the facility's administrator (ADM), the ADM confirmed an alleged abuse incident occurred on 9/29/24. The ADM indicated there would be an investigation into the incident between Residents 1 and 2. During an interview on 11/18/24 at 12:10 p.m. with the ADM, the ADM stated the investigation was completed but the results were not submitted…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-19 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set ([MDS] a standardized tool that measures health status in nursing home residents) assessment accurately reflected the residents status for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1). This failure resulted in the documentation of inaccurate assessments and had the potential for Resident 1's identified care needs to go unmet. Findings: Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including, dementia (loss of cognitive functioning; thinking, remembering, and reasoning and interferes with a person's daily life and activities), Alzheimer's disease (a brain disorder that slowly destroys memory and thinking skills), depression (a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest in activities) and hypertension (high blood pressure). During a review of Resident 1's admission MDS - Section E -Behavior, dated 10/12/22, the MDS indicated, Physical behavioral symptoms directed toward others (e.g., hitting, kicking,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-19 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to follow their policy and procedure (P&P) to review and revise a person-centered comprehensive care plan for one of three residents (Resident 1) who exhibited aggressive behavior towards other residents. This failure resulted in Resident 1 becoming aggressive and kicking another resident (Resident 2) in the leg and had the potential to place other residents at risk for serious injury. Findings: Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Dementia (loss of cognitive functioning; thinking, remembering, and reasoning and interferes with a person's daily life and activities), Alzheimer's disease (a brain disorder that slowly destroys memory and thinking skills), depression (a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest in activities) and hypertension (high blood pressure). During a review of Resident 1's Nursing Progress Notes (NPN), dated 9/18/24, the NPN indicated, Change in Condition . Physical aggression, Verbal…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2022-02-17 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — widespreadProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview , and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff implemented its policy and procedure (P&P), Activity planning and Procedures for the Activity Director, (undated), for 40 of 40 sampled residents when: 1) residents did not receive a written evaluation as to their abilities to participate in activities and signed by a physician; 2) residents did not receive an individual activity treatment plan based on their individual likes and preferences; and 3) there was no documentation of individual problems, needs, and goals in any of the 40 resident's medical records. These cumulative failures have the potential to result in physical and psychosocial harm to residents and a reduction in achieving and/or maintaining their highest level of mental and physical well being. Findings: During a review of the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Activity Planning and Procedures for the Activity Director, (undated), the P&P indicated: Purpose: To fulfill the social, psychological, and physical needs of the patients. To return them to reality and prevent…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-02-17 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe food handling and sanitation were implemented when: 1) Two of two buckets containing sanitizing solution was not at an effective concentration to sanitize a food contact surface. 2) The ice machine was not maintained in a sanitary manner. 3) The temperature monitoring log for the refrigerator, located at the nursing station, was greater than 41 degrees Fahrenheit (F) multiple times in which the staff failed to identify and report for immediate remedy. These failures had the potential to place the residents at an increased risk of foodborne illness. Findings: 1. During a concurrent observation and interview on 2/8/22, at 11:03 a.m., with Dietary Aide (DA) 2, in the kitchen, DA2 was observed wiping down a food utility cart with a cloth. DA2 stated, the cloth was from a red bucket that contained sanitizer. DA2 checked the concentration of the sanitizer; opened a new package of chem (chemistry) test strips (measures the concentration of sanitizer in solution) and tested the quaternary sanitizing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-02-17 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — patternHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to post a copy of the facility's grievance procedure on the resident bulletin board as required in its policy and procedure titled, Grievances/Complaints, Filing, dated April 2017. This facility failure has the potential for: 1) all residents or resident representatives not knowing how to file a grievance/complaint and resident's issues not being heard or resolved; and 2) not properly documenting and recording resident grievances in the, Resident Grievance Complaint Log. Findings: During a review of the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Grievances/Complaints, Filing, dated April 2017, the P&P indicated: Policy statement - Residents and their representatives have the right to file grievances, either orally or in writing, to the facility staff or to the agency designated to hear grievances (e.g , the State Ombudsman) .Policy Interpretation and Implementation (4) .A copy of our grievance/complaint procedure is posted on the resident bulletin board. During an interview on 2/9/22, at 4:20 p.m., with the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-02-17 · tag F0680 — patternEnsure the activities program is directed by a qualified professional.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the activity director (AD) had the required qualifications and experience per the facility job description titled, [Name of Facility] Activity Director Job Description, (undated). This failure has the potential to result in physical and psychosocial harm to residents. Findings: The facility job description, [Name of facility] Activity Director Job Description , (undated) indicated: Position - Under the direction of the administrator and/or the director of nursing services develops, implements, and supervises the activity program and maintains required record . 1. Qualifications - .and shall receive consultation by an occupational therapist, occupational therapist assistant, or recreation therapist who has at least 1 year of experience in a health care setting. Examples of Duties: Develops, implements, and supervises all the activity programs and recreation of the facility and coordinates the activity schedule with other patient services . Evaluates each patient to plan a meaningful program . Maintains…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-02-17 · tag F0813 — patternHave a policy regarding use and storage of foods brought to residents by family and other visitors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop a policy and procedure to ensure safe and sanitary storage, handling, and consumption of food items when food was stored in a designated refrigerator, adjacent to the nursing station, that could include food brought to residents by family and visitors. This failure has the potential for unsafe food storage, handling, and consumption that could place the residents at an increased risk of foodborne illness. Findings: During an interview on 2/8/22, at 11:35 a.m., with Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) 2, CNA2 stated, when family brings in food from outside, they give it to the Charge Nurse to put it away in the refrigerator in the medication storage room. During a concurrent observation and interview on 02/08/22, at 11:39 a.m., with Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON), located at the refrigerator in the medication room, at the nursing station, ADON stated that is the refrigerator where food brought to residents by family or visitors would be stored. The refrigerator had an electronic temperature…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-02-17 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure its policies and procedures (P&P) on COVID-19 (a respiratory infection caused by the SARS-Cov 2 virus) infection prevention and control were followed when: 1) the facility did not properly screen the State/Federal survey team for COVID-19 upon entry at the facility's north wing entrance; and 2) LN4 did not follow the facility's polices and procedures (P&P), Infection Prevention and Control Measures, and Administering Medications, during medication administration to two sampled residents (Residents 36 and 41) who were on transmission-based precautions (TBP) in the facility's designated COVID-19 quarantine zone. These failures had the potential to spread COVID-19 to residents, staff and/or other visitors going in and out of the facility. Findings: 1) On 2/8/22 at 10:15 a.m., the State/Federal survey team, arrived at the facility to conduct its required annual federal recertification survey. The survey team entered the facility through the north wing entrance which directly accessed the main nurses'…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-02-17 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure two of 12 sampled residents (Residents 36 and 41) were provided reasonable accommodation for the use of the facility's call light system. This facility failure had the potential for the residents not to have their needs met. Findings: 1) During a review of Resident 41's, admission Record (AR), dated 9/30/19, the AR indicated, Resident 41 was admitted with diagnoses including, Urinary Tract Infection (UTI - infection in any part of the urinary system), Hemiplegia/Hemiparesis (paralysis to one side of the body), and Pressure Ulcer of Sacral Region, Stage 4 (deep, extensive wound of the lower back). During a concurrent observation and interview on 2/8/22, at 10:42 a.m., with Resident 41, the resident was observed in bed, with eyes closed, but arousable when name was called. Resident 41 had a slight contracture (a permanent shortening of a muscle or joint) of the left arm, had arthritic (swelling and tenderness of one or more joints) fingers on both hands, and had suffered a stroke (a medical emergency…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-02-17 · tag F0637 — isolatedAssess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to complete a Change of Condition (COC - a system for identifying, evaluating, and reporting when resident's condition changed) per their policy and procedure for one of 12 sampled residents (Resident 35) when Resident 35 fell. This facility failure had the potential for vulnerable residents to not receive appropriate care, decline in their functional mobility, and development of skin breakdown and have a delay in treatment and services. Findings: During a review of the facility's Policy and Procedure (P&P) titled, Change in a Resident's Condition or Status, dated May 2017, the P&P indicated, Prior to notifying the Physician or healthcare provider, the nurse will make detailed observations and gather relevant and pertinent information for the provider, including information prompted by the Interact SBAR (a tool to help in facilitating communication between nurses and prescribers) Communication Form. During a concurrent interview and record review, on 2/9/22, at 11:35 a.m., with Minimum Data Set Coordinator…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-02-17 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolatedEnsure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a proper and alternative means of communication for translation services for one of 12 sampled residents (Resident 16). This facility failure has the potential for Resident 16's physical and psychosocial needs not being met. Findings: During an observation and interview on 2/8/22, at 1:45 p.m., with Resident 16 in the resident's room, Resident 16 was only able to communicate in Spanish. There were no other means of communication observed in the resident's room. During an interview on 2/8/22, at 2 p.m., with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA), the CNA stated, she was the only Spanish speaking staff member at that time but was not assigned to Resident 16. The CNA further stated, whenever they needed translation for Resident 16, she would be called to do so, but is not readily available all the time. During an interview on 2/16/22, at 8:20 a.m., with the Director of Nursing (DON), the DON confirmed there was no adequate system in place to communicate with non-English speaking residents. The DON further…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-02-17 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure its medication error rate during staff medication administration was less than five percent. The facility had a cumulative medication error rate of eight percent when 2 errors of 25 opportunities for errors, were observed between two licensed nurses who administered medication, to one unsampled resident (Resident 42) and 1 of 12 sampled residents (Resident 41). The observed medication administration errors were: 1) Resident 42's medication order of Carafate Suspension (Sucralfate - medication used to treat and prevent ulcers in the stomach) was to be administered before meals and at bedtime. A licensed nurse (LN3) administered the medication after Resident 42 had eaten breakfast; 2) Resident 41's medication order of Juven (a therapeutic nutrition powder for wound healing) powdered supplement was to be mixed in eight oz. (ounces) of fluid before administration. LN4 did not measure the fluid that was mixed with the powdered supplement. These findings had to potential for adverse consequences to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-02-17 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure its medication error rate during staff medication administration was less than five percent. The facility had a cumulative medication error rate of eight percent when 2 errors of 25 opportunities for errors, were observed between two licensed nurses who administered medication, to one unsampled resident (Resident 42) and 1 of 12 sampled residents (Resident 41). The observed medication administration errors were: 1) Resident 42's medication order of Carafate Suspension (Sucralfate - medication used to treat and prevent ulcers in the stomach) was to be administered before meals and at bedtime. A licensed nurse (LN3) administered the medication after Resident 42 had eaten breakfast; 2) Resident 41's medication order of Juven (a therapeutic nutrition powder for wound healing) powdered supplement was to be mixed in eight oz. (ounces) of fluid before administration. LN4 did not measure the fluid that was mixed with the powdered supplement. These findings had to potential for adverse consequences to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-02-17 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to keep an unattended medication cart locked while parked at the nursing station. This facility failure has the potential for residents and/or visitors to have access to medications that could lead to adverse complications. Findings: During an observation on 2/8/22, at 3:35 p.m., at the central nursing station, an unattended medication cart was found to be parked on the side. The medication cart was unlocked and a drawer was able to be opened without resistance. During an interview on 2/8/22, at 3:41 p.m., with Licensed Nurse (LN) 2, LN2 stated, she forgot to lock the medication cart after use, before leaving it on the side of the nursing station. LN2 acknowledged the medication cart should be locked when not in use. During an interview on 2/16/22, at 8:15 a.m., with the Director of Nursing (DON), the DON stated, the medication cart should be locked at all times, when not in use or unattended. During a review of the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Storage of Medications, dated April 2019, the P&P…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-02-17 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolatedProvide or obtain dental services for each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide dental services to 1 of 12 sampled residents (Resident 38). This resulted in Resident 38 not having teeth to chew food, having to be put on a modified diet, and has the potential for weight loss and poor self-image. Findings: During a review of the facility policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Dental Examination/Assessment, dated December 2013, the P&P indicated: Policy Statement 1. Resident shall be offered dental services as needed . 4. Upon conducting a dental examination, a resident needing dental services will be promptly referred to a dentist. During a review of Resident 38's admission Record, the record indicated, Resident 38 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of unspecified dementia with behavioral disturbance (disorder of the mental processes caused by brain disease or injury and marked by memory disorders, personality changes, and impaired reasoning). During a review of Resident 38's Order Summary…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-02-17 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — isolatedProvide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one cook (Cook1) was competent on internal cooking temperatures for ground beef and poultry to ensure food safety. This failure placed the residents at risk of a foodborne illness. Findings: During an interview on 2/8/22, at 3:39 p.m., with [NAME] (Cook1) and the Dietary Service Manager (DSM), [NAME] 1 stated, I just look at it (ground beef) to determine the meat is done. The DSM stated, a thermometer should be used to check for internal cooking temperatures to determine when food is thoroughly cooked. During an interview on 2/8/22, at 4:10 p.m., with [NAME] (Cook1), Cook1 stated, I would cut open the chicken and check temperature to read above 160 (degrees Fahrenheit [F]. During an interview on 2/8/22, at 4:12 p.m., with the DSM, the DSM stated, the internal temperature of ground beef should be 155 degrees F and chicken should reach an internal cooking temperature of 165 degrees F. The DSM stated, she would expect a cook to be competent on internal cooking temperatures for food safety. During a review of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-02-17 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolatedEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow the menu as planned when: 1. A fortified menu item was not served for 1 of 12 sampled residents (Resident 23) as directed on the meal tray card. 2. The menu for a therapeutic renal diet was not followed for 1 of 12 sampled residents (Resident 36). These failures had the potential to not meet the residents nutritional needs per the planned menu as approved by the facility's Registered Dietitian. Findings: 1. During a concurrent observation and interview on 2/9/22, at 11:43 a.m., with Dietary Aide (DA) 1, in the kitchen, DA1 removed Resident 23's tray from the meal delivery cart and reviewed Resident 23's meal tray ticket that included, fortified, regular diet. DA1 asked the cook what the fortified item was, and the cook (Cook1) stated, I can give two pats of butter. Concurrently, the Dietary Services Manager (DSM) observed Resident 23's meal tray that was removed from the meal delivery cart and confirmed there should have been two pats of butter and the fortified menu item for the fortified diet was not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MT TRUST | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 50% | since 08/16/2021 |
| TANNER, BRYAN | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | 25% | since 06/01/2021 |
| TANNER, RENAE | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 25% | since 08/16/2021 |
| ZERMATT U.S. HEALTH SERVICES, LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 06/01/2021 |
| JOHNSON, JAMES | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 09/01/2021 |
| NOORISTANI, AHMAD | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 08/16/2021 |
| PADILLA, JACE | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/27/2024 |
| 840 E. CHAPEL, LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 06/01/2021 |
| MAYER PP ASSOCIATES, LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 06/01/2021 |
| MAYER, HELENE | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 06/01/2021 |
| MAYER, RONALD | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 06/01/2021 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 16 rows in the source record cover these 11 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $366K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in CA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 055826. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-02-12, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.