No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Arbol Healthcare Center Of Santa Rosa

300 Fountaingrove Parkway, Santa Rosa, CA 95403 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 45 certified beds · (707) 566-8600 Medicare only — no Medicaid

Call the home — (707) 566-8600 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citation — no harm found (F0609) — cited Jan 2024
Insights

On the public record, this home looks stronger than most — but visit before you decide.

In its favor
  • a strong health-inspection score (4/5) — the hardest rating to game (though it’s ranked within its own state, not nationally)
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
Worth asking about
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (36) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

5/5
CMS overall
5 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 4 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 4 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★★ 5/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
3536 Mendocino Ave Ste 200 · (707) 573-6166 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
401 Bicentennial Way · (707) 393-4180 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
3401 Cleveland Ave · (707) 541-6741 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Sugarloaf Mountain · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 4 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 2 to 4 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating4★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased6.1%10.2%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight2.6%4.0%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.8%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%1.2%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms0.0%7.3%6.5%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.4%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury0.0%1.6%3.3%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication5.3%13.7%18.9%better
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers4.1%4.3%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control18.0%10.2%21.2%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table8.0%12.0%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.6%1.5%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine96.9%93.2%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission23.5%23.0%22.6%typical
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit14.3%11.2%12.0%worse

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

68.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 292 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

68.6%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
8.9%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
55.2%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
1.23U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.49hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.58hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.16hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 55.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 105 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 1.23 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 98% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 36% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF68.6%CMS range 61.8–74.651.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024better than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF8.9%CMS range 6.8–11.710.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge55.2%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge51.4%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge50.5%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting96.3%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge99.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened1.4%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization4.6%CMS range 2.4–7.67.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.881.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

1.25
RN hours/ resident / day
1.31
LPN hours/ resident / day
3.07
Aide hours/ resident / day
5.62
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
1.09
RN hoursweekends
50.0%
Total nursing turnover
41.7%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 45 beds and averages 34.2 residents a day — about 76% occupied, or roughly 11 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 5.62 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.25 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.07 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 5.14 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.82 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.31 to 1.09 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 50% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

9
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-11-18)
7
at the previous standard inspection (2023-10-27)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

36 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 26 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-09 · tag F0627 — isolated
    Ensure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transfer/discharge.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility placed the life of one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) in danger when the facility discharged her from the facility when her insurance coverage ended. The facility did so fully aware Resident 1's family could not provide care at home, and without an appropriate discharge plan, transfer documentation, or follow-up aftercare. In addition, the facility physician discharge orders for Physical therapy (PT, the practice of improving mobility and flexibility through a variety of exercises and other treatments), Occupational Therapy (OT, a therapy that uses everyday life activities to promote health, well-being, and the ability to participate in important activities) and Registered Nursing Services, dated 11/28/25, were not followed.As a result, Resident 1 was immediately hospitalized after discharge from the facility, with a post-surgical abdominal wound dehiscence (when a surgical incision splits open again requiring prompt medical attention) requiring…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-11-18 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide care that respected resident dignity for one out of 13 sampled residents (Resident 34) when: 1. Staff did not close Resident 34's privacy curtain and door when performing a COVID-19 (an infectious disease caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus) and influenza (a respiratory infection caused by influenza virus) swab on Resident 34.2. Staff did not knock on Resident 34's room prior to entering. These failures had the potential for improper care to the residents. Findings:1. During a review of Resident 34's admission RECORD (AR), dated 9/16/2025, the admission record indicated, Resident 34 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of cerebral infarction (a condition where blood flow to the brain is interrupted), apraxia (a disorder that affects speech) and aphasia (a disorder that affects the ability to understand language). During a concurrent observation and interview on 9/15/2025 at 4:03 p.m. with the Registered Nurse (RN) 1,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-11-18 · tag F0552 — isolated
    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a physician obtained informed consents (a process in which residents are given important information of the possible risk and benefits of the use of psychotropic medications-drug affecting mental state) for one of thirteen sampled residents (Resident 38) when Resident 38 received Trazodone HCl (an antidepressant medication) and Escitalopram Oxalate (antidepressant medication) without an informed consent.This failure had the potential in Resident 38 receiving psychotropic medications without being fully informed of the risk and benefits of the medication being administered.Findings:During a concurrent interview and record review on 9/17/25 at 1:30 p.m. with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 1, Resident 38's physician orders were reviewed. The orders included Trazadone and Escitalopram Oxalate. LVN 1 stated there was no consent obtained for both medications and that it was the licensed nurse's responsibility to ensure the consent was obtained.During an interview on 9/17/2025 at 2:17 p.m. with Minimum Data Set Nurse…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-18 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete a Physician Orders for Life Sustaining Treatment (POLST- is a form designed to improve patient care by creating a portable medical order form that records patients' treatment wishes so that emergency personnel know what treatments the patient wants in the event of a medical emergency) for one of thirteen sampled residents (Residents 33).This deficient practice had the potential for Resident 33 to receive unnecessary care and/or treatment services against the resident's wishes.Findings:During an interview on 9/15/25 at 3:38 P.M. with Resident 33, Resident 33 stated that she would like a copy of the POLST but it was not given. During a concurrent interview and record Review on 9/17/25 at 11:28 A.M. with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 1, Resident 33's POLST was reviewed. LVN 1 stated the POLST was in the chart but was not completed. LVN 1 stated it was the nurse's responsibility to ensure that the POLST was completed. LVN 1 stated on 9/14/25, the progress note indicated a follow up would be done but no follow up was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-11-18 · tag F0582 — isolated
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a written Notice of Medicare Provided Non-Coverage (NOMNC-a notice that informs the beneficiary about the impending end of coverage and their right to appeal the decision) for one of thirteen sampled residents (Resident 42) when Medicare coverage was terminated. This deficient practice resulted in not protecting Resident 42's right to appeal the termination of Medicare Part A and possibly denying Resident 42's needed services. Findings:During a review of Resident 42's Minimum Data Set (MDS- a report that helps the healthcare team plan the best treatment and services for a resident in a skilled nursing facility), the MDS indicated that Resident 42 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included sepsis (a severe life-threatening reaction to infection) and cancer. During a concurrent interview and record review on 9/16/2025 at 2:00 p.m. with Operations Manager (OM), OM reviewed the facility document titled, Skilled Nursing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-11-18 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain a safe and comfortable environment for three of 13 sampled residents (Resident 6, Resident 8 and Resident 18) when:1. Resident 6's inventory sheet was not updated and was inaccurately completed. This failure had the potential to result in Resident 16's belongings not being documented in the event of an alleged loss or theft.2. Fire alarm test was conducted without notification to Resident 8 and 18. This failure resulted in Resident 8 and 18 feeling startled.Findings:1.During an interview on 9/15/25 at 4:40 p.m. with Family (FM), FM stated that the facility had misplaced her dad's hearing aids and that she had to purchase a new set. FM stated she was unaware of the inventory log.During a concurrent interview and record review on 9/17/25 at 9:24 a.m. with Social Service Director (SSD), Resident 6's Inventory of Personal Effects (IPE) dated 8/27/25 was reviewed. The IPE indicated, one left hearing aid. SSD stated the inventory was not documented accurately since he had two hearing aids. SSD stated on 9/6/25 the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-11-18 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain professional standards when oxygen was administered to one of 13 sampled residents (Resident 35), without a physician's order.This failure had the potential to cause harm to the residents. Findings:During a review of Resident 35's admission Record, dated 9/16/2025, the admission record indicated, Resident 35 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of emphysema (a disease where the air sacs in the lungs are damaged), respiratory failure with hypoxia (a condition where the lungs fail to provide enough oxygen), and dependence on supplemental oxygen (the need for supplemental oxygen therapy to maintain adequate oxygen levels in the body). During an observation on 9/16/2025 at 1:57 p.m. in Resident 35's room, Resident 35 was observed lying in bed while receiving four liters per minute continuous supplemental oxygen through nasal cannula (a thin, two-pronged plastic tube device that delivers supplemental oxygen from the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-18 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that medications were stored securely and administered according to physician orders for one of 13 sampled residents (Resident 20) when staff left medication at Resident 20's bedside. This failure had the potential for misuse by the resident on unintended areas or for non-approved purposes. Findings:On 9/15/2025 at 3:50 p.m. a 30 milliliter (unit of measurement) medication cup with a white cream/ointment was observed on the shelf in Resident 20's room. The medication cup was not labeled.On 9/15/2025 at 3:56 p.m. during a concurrent interview and record review with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 1, LVN 1 verified that Resident 20 did not have a physician order to keep any type of medication at bedside.During a review of the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Medication Storage in the Facility dated April 2008, the P&P indicated, ID4: Bedside Medication Storage.A. A written order for the bedside storage of medication is present in the resident's medical record.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-18 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food was stored and prepared in safe and sanitary conditions in the food service department, when the dry storage area contained food items that were undated. This failure had the potential to expose residents to food contamination and food-borne illnesses (sickness by consuming contaminated food or drinks). Findings:During a concurrent observation and interview on 9/16/2025 at 2:00 p.m. with the Consultant Registered Dietitian (CRD), in the kitchen, there was a food container labeled Polenta with no expiration date. CRD stated the expectation was for staff to carefully inspect all food delivery, to label and to date food items. CRD further stated labeling and dating food items were necessary to prevent food-borne illnesses to the residents. During a review of the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled, GENERAL RECEIVING OF DELIVERY OF FOOD AND SUPPLIES, dated 2018, the P&P indicated, Label all items with the delivery date or a use-by-date .

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-18 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement and maintain a safe and sanitary environment with an effective infection prevention and control program for two of 13 sampled resident's (Resident 33 and Resident 4) when: 1.Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 1 entered a coronavirus (COVID-19- a contagious serious respiratory infection transmitted from person to person) isolation room with a surgical mask.2. Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP, an infection control strategy in nursing homes that expands the use of Personal Protective Equipment (PPE), specifically gowns and gloves, for high-contact care activities to prevent the spread of multidrug-resistant organisms), was not followed for one of 13 sampled residents (Resident 4).These failures had the potential to place residents and staff at increased risk for infections. Findings: 1.During an observation on 9/16/25 at 3:28 P.M. near room [ROOM NUMBER], a red sign was posted which read Stop Special droplet/contact precautions. A…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 26 citations
  • Potential for harm · E2025-02-10 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — pattern
    Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, and facility record review, the facility failed to have a Registered Nurse (RN) performing the function of the Director of Nursing (DON) on a full-time basis to provide oversight and guidance on the provision of care provided by nursing staff. This failure prevented the facility from having the required management, to adequately assess and meet the needs of residents in a timely manner and had the potential to negatively impact the quality of care delivered by licensed and non-licensed nursing staff to residents. Findings: During an interview on 1/17/25 at 12:35 p.m., Licensed Staff A stated there was no DON at the facility and there has not been a DON since November. Licensed Staff A stated the facility was advertising for a DON, but currently, there were no candidates. During an interview on 1/17/ 25 at 12:45 p.m., the Infection Preventionist (IP) stated the previous DON left at the end of November 2024. The IP also stated she currently occupied the full-time IP role and the interim DON role, until a permanent DON is hired. The IP confirmed she was a Licensed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-02-10 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — pattern
    Conduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a facility-wide assessment (a review of a facility's infrastructure, resident population, and services to determine needed resources to provide care) was available, current, and complete. This deficient practice decreased the facility ' s potential to safely admit residents and ensure their care needs were met. Findings: During an interview on 1/17/24 at 1:58 p.m., a copy of the facility assessment was requested from the Director of Staff Development (DSD). The DSD stated the facility assessment was not available and was locked in the Administrator ' s office. During an interview on 1/21/24 at 10:25 a.m., the Infection Preventionist (IP) (who was also the interim Director of Nursing (DON)) stated she could not find the facility assessment. The IP stated she was putting one together over the weekend and what she had was incomplete. A review of the of the document provided to the surveyor on 1/21/24 did not follow the facility ' s policy and procedure for conducting, reviewing, and updating the facility assessment.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-10 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure supervision to prevent accidents for one resident (Resident 1) when: 1. Resident 1 eloped from the facility and was found face down on the pavement; and, 2. The Wander Monitoring System (WMS, an alarm system compromised of a monitor placed on the resident and placed on facility exits used to prevent residents from wandering or seeking to leave the facility) ordered by the physician to be implemented for Resident 1 was not functional. These failures resulted in Resident 1 ' s obtaining trauma to the right eyebrow and a laceration which required stiches and decreased the facility ' s potential to ensure the safety of residents at risk of elopement to leave the facility undetected placing the resident at risk for injury or harm. Findings: 1. Review of Resident 1 ' s clinical record showed Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with a diagnosis which included Traumatic Subdural Hemorrhage (a collection of blood between the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-10 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure patient care equipment was functioning and maintained under sanitary conditions when oxygen therapy equipment provided to facility residents was dirty and not maintained. This failure decreased the facility ' s potential to prevent infections among respiratory compromised residents who used oxygen concentrators for medical treatments. Findings: During an interview on 1/21/25 at 1:48 p.m., the Maintenance Supervisor (MS) stated he checked the oxygen storage room periodically to ensure the oxygen tanks were secure. The MS also stated he did not have oversight nor did any maintenance on the oxygen concentrators and was unsure who maintained the oxygen concentrators. During an observation and current interview on 1/21/25 at 2:00 p.m., the Infection Preventionist (IP) stated she tracked all residents on respiratory therapy and any respiratory infections that occurred in the facility. The IP stated there were currently six residents on oxygen therapy who used oxygen concentrators provided by the facility. An…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-25 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a person-centered care plan with measurable objectives and appropriate interventions for one resident (Resident 1), that addressed fall precautions when the resident developed an L3 fracture (a fracture of the third vertebra in the lumbar spine) of unknown origin. This failure put Resident 1 at risk for additional injuries and falls and had the potential to cause pain and Resident 1's safety to go unmonitored. Findings: During an interview on 7/22/24 at 10:15 a.m., the DON (Director of Nursing) stated she followed-up on Resident 1's abdominal pain by sending the resident to the hospital where an X-ray and blood test confirmed Resident 1 had an L3 fracture and Osteoporosis (a bone disease that develops when bone mineral density and bone mass decreases, or when the structure and strength of bone changes. This can lead to a decrease in bone strength that can increase the risk of fractures (broken bones). The DON stated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-13 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to honor (Resident 1) choice for the refusal of end-of-life medical treatment. This failure resulted in Resident 1 receiving Cardiopulmonary conversion (chest compressions) and mechanical ventilation (assisted breaths with a medical device) against Resident 1's decision. During a review of Resident 1's medical record, Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (POLST) form, dated [DATE], indicated in box A, Do Not Attempt Resuscitation / (DNR) (Allow Natural Death), Box B indicated, Comfort -Focused Treatment – primary goal of maximizing comfort. Relieve pain and suffering with medication by any route as needed, use oxygen, suctioning, and manual treatment of airway obstruction. Do not use treatments listed in Full treatment (mechanical ventilation and cardioversion) and Selective Treatment unless consistent with comfort goal. Request transfer to hospital only if comfort needs cannot be met in current location. Box D indicated, signature…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-05-30 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards of food service safety when: 1) the facility failed to store dry foods (staples; mixes and packaged foods; canned and dried foods; spices, herbs, condiments, and other foods not requiring refrigeration) in the optimum temperature between 50°and 70°Fahrenheit (F); and 2) the facility failed to prevent cross-contamination of kitchen dishes when dietary staff operating the dishwasher handled dirty and clean dishes without changing gloves or performing hand hygiene. These failures had the potential for residents to consume degraded food and had the potential to expose residents to gastro-intestinal diseases. Findings: 1) During an observation on 5/30/24, at 3:20 p.m., the dry foods storage felt warm. There was no thermometer in the dry foods storage. During a concurrent interview, the Dietary Services Manager (DSM) was asked to check the room temperature in the dry foods storage. The DSM stated there was no thermometer available to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-01-19 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — widespread
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to report one incident of resident abuse to authorities within the required two-hour time frame after the allegation was made. This failure to report an allegation of abuse within the Federally mandated requirement of two hours, had the potential to result in ongoing resident abuse and physical, mental, and /or emotional harm, and prevented the State Agency from conducting a timely investigation into the allegation. Findings: During a review of a report titled State of California Report of Suspected Dependent/Elder Abuse (SOC 341) dated 1/1/24, the SOC 341 indicated alleged abuse occurred on 12/30/23 with exact time unknown. The SOC 341 indicated telephone report made to the State Agency and Local Ombudsman on 12/31/23 at 12:15 p.m. and written report was faxed 1/1/24 at 10:49 a.m. During a review of a document titled SOC 341 General Instructions, dated 8/22, Instructions indicated, If the abuse occurred in a Long-Term Care (LTC) facility,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-10-27 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — widespread
    Provide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on dietary staff observations, dietary staff interviews and dietary document review, the facility failed to ensure staff competency in relationship to dietary staff position as evidence by dietary staff not 1) knowing how to test the quaternary (quat ammonium compounds designed to kill germs) sanitizer solution used to sanitize the kitchen countertops and sanitize the pots and pans in the manual three-compartment sink process (wash, rinse, and sanitize), 2) using the correct Cool Down Process for hot foods, 3) follow therapeutic diets when portion sizes were not plated correctly and meat needing to be pureed (texture-modified diet with the consistence of pudding for people who have difficulties with chewing and swallowing) was not weighed prior to being pureed, 4) serving pasteurized (heat treated to kill harmful bacteria such as salmonella) eggs, and 5) thawing meat according to the facility's policy/procedure. Failure to ensure comprehensive staff competency may result in practices associated with cross…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-10-27 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on kitchen observations, dietary staff interview, and dietary document review, the facility failed to ensure safe dietetic services as evidence by 1) meat not thawed according to the facility's policy and procedure, 2) the correct Cool Down Process for cooked meats was not followed per the facility's policy and procedure, 3) dietary staff did not know how to test the quaternary (quat ammonium compounds designed to kill germs) sanitizer solutions, 4) non-pasteurized eggs were being used, 5) the kitchen floors and counter appliances looked dirty, 6) garbage cans in the prep food areas were not covered with lids and the garage bens outside were open and there was garbage surrounding the garbage bins, 7) opened dried food products were not labeled with an open date and use by date, 8) fresh produce located in bins in the refrigerator were not labeled with a received by date, 9) spoiled produce was not thrown away, 10) the high temperature dishwasher wash cycle was not running per the manufactures recommendation, 11) a portion of the kitchen wall near the ovens was not repaired,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-10-27 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to maintain an effective infection prevention and control program when: 1. Staff were not following the facility's guidelines for Contact Precautions, donning and doffing of Personal Protective Equipment (PPE, equipment worn to minimize exposure to hazards that cause serious workplace injuries and illnesses), and appropriate hand hygiene with a resident who was positive for Clostridium Difficile infection (C. diff, also known as Clostridioides difficile or C. difficile, is a bacteria that causes diarrhea and inflammation of the colon. It is a contagious infection that is estimated to cause almost half a million infections in the United States each year. - Centers for Disease Control and Prevention), 2. Staff were not performing and offering hand hygiene (HH, a way of cleaning one's hands that substantially reduces potential harmful microorganisms on the hands) before and after meals for eight out of eight sampled residents (Residents 3, 7,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-10-27 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — pattern
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure it had a medication error rate of less than 5%, when three of 30 medications were not given according to the physician's orders. This failure resulted in a 10% error rate and caused one unsampled resident (Resident 183) to be upset and have a bowel movement immediately after her meal, potentially losing the opportunity to absorb the nutrients from her food. Findings: During a med pass observation on 10/25/23 at 8:36 a.m., Resident 183 walked back to her room from the Dining Room and sat on the edge of her bed as Licensed Staff I started to prepare medications by the doorway. Shortly after, Resident 183 stood up, stated she needed to go to the bathroom. Licensed Staff I dispensed a tablet of loperamide (used to treat diarrhea) and Eliquis (used to treat or prevent blood clots) into a medicine cup, and mixed a packet of cholestyramine powder (used to control bile acid-induced diarrhea due to short bowel syndrome) with approximately one-half cup of water. Resident 183 returned to bed, and as Licensed Staff…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-10-27 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to honor the food preferences for two of three residents sampled for food (Residents 1 and 4). These failures resulted in Residents 1 and 4 to feel ignored and frustrated as they were served food they disliked, which may lead to poor nutritional intake and unplanned weight loss. Findings: During an interview on 10/23/23 at 10:19 a.m., Resident 4 stated she was served eggs despite telling the staff that she disliked eggs. Resident 4 stated it was frustrating to be asked for food preferences if she was still going to be served eggs. During a concurrent observation and interview on 10/24/23 at 08:44 a.m., Resident 1 was seated up in bed for breakfast. On the tray was a plate with seasoned potatoes and a piece of toast, a glass of milk and a cup of tea was on the overbed table. The meal appeared untouched, and Resident 1 stated she was not a big breakfast person. When offered to at least have some milk, Resident 1 stated, I hate milk. A review of Resident 1's meal ticket, located next to the plate, indicated,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-27 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to honor the choices for two of two (Residents 20 and 8) sampled residents when: 1. Resident 8 was given a shower despite her refusal, and 2. Resident 20 was not permitted to self-administer medications without being assessed first, contrary to the facility's policies and procedures on medication self-administration. These failures resulted in Resident 8 to lash out in anger at the staff, and had the potential for Resident 8 to experience feelings of decreased self-worth, both of which could negatively impact their psychological well-being. Findings: Resident 8 A review of Resident 8's admission Record, indicated she was admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including muscle weakness, unsteadiness on feet, abnormalities of gait (manner of walking) and mobility, vascular dementia (changes to memory, thinking, and behavior resulting from conditions that affect the blood vessels in the brain. Cognition and brain function can be…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-27 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to provide care and services in accordance with standards of practice when: 1. A licensed therapist did not reassess a resident for a Restorative Nursing assistant (RNA) program (focused on nursing interventions that promote the resident's ability to adapt and adjust to living as independently and safely as possible) and obtain a new physician order for an RNA program after an RNA order had expired for three out of three sampled residents (Residents 5, 13 and 17), 2. Nursing staff were not repositioning and floating bilateral (both sides) heels of Resident 8 per physician's order and per facility policy, and 3. A dispensed medication was left unattended at a resident's bedside (Resident 1). These failures could lead to an ineffective RNA program for Residents 5, 13 and 17, a potential for Resident 8 to develop a skin breakdown, and increased the risk for Resident 1 to consume a potentially-contaminated medication. Findings: 1. A review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2021-12-06 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — widespread
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents and staff knew the complaint and grievance process and failed to post complaint and grievance notices in a manner accessible to all residents. This failure did not ensure residents rights to file a grievance and had the potential to delay the facility's identification and response to residents' needs or complaints. Findings: During a resident council meeting on 11/29/21 at 10:00 a.m., the resident attendees were asked if they knew how to file a grievance. The Resident Council President (14) stated, she did not know there was a grievance process or how to complete a grievance. When questioning the residents, they did not know where the forms were kept. The Resident Council President (14) stated if she has a problem or a complaint, she goes to the Activities Director for help. During an observation post resident council meeting on 11/29/21 at 1:00 p.m., a bulletin board located outside of the dining room contained an approximate 9x5 card with the name and number of the Social Services director…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2021-12-06 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — widespread
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide competent nursing staff when providing care and services for two of 8 residents when: 1. The facility did not evaluate competencies and skills of all licensed nurses and CNAs (Certified Nursing Assistant); 2. Nursing staff held Resident 16's blood pressure medication without a physician order; 3. Nursing staff did not administer medication to reduce excessive oral secretion per physician order; 4. Nursing staff assessed Resident 8's residual (volume of fluid remaining in the stomach at a point in time during enteral nutrition feeding) when the resident had a gastro-jejunosstomy tube (a feeding tube with its distal end placed within the small intestine). These failures resulted in Resident 16 not receiving blood pressure medicine and nutritional supplement, and contributed to Resident 8's multiple hospitalizations due to recurrent aspiration pneumonia. Findings: 1. During a concurrent interview and record review on 12/2/21, at 10:10 a.m., competency and skills check for licensed nurses and CNAs were…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2021-12-06 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food safety in accordance with standards of practice when 1) there was a lack of accurate labeling/dating of thawing meats; 2) lack of sanitary conditions in the food preparation area 3) lack of staff training and review of operational processes, related to food safety within food and nutritional services. Failure to follow safe food practices put all facility residents at risk for contracting foodborne illness and compromise the health of residents who eat prepared food from the kitchen. Findings: 1) During an initial tour of the main facility kitchen and concurrent interviews on 11/29/21 at 9:15 a.m., the kitchen was full of produce, meat and fish boxes from a Sysco food delivery that arrived that morning. The walk-in refrigerator and freezer contained boxes of deli meat, produce, and frozen meat and fish, stocked on the floor of the walk-in refrigerator from the morning delivery. Chubs of pork and deli meats located on a storage rack in the walk-in refrigerator were not labeled and dated. Meats…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-12-06 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed provide assessment and treatment for one of 8 sampled residents (Resident 8) when the nurses did not assess Resident 8 before and after oral suctioning and did not administer medication to reduce excessive oral secretion. This failure may have contributed to Resident 8 developing pneumonia (infection in the lungs). Findings: During a clinical record review for Resident 8, the Face Sheet indicated facility admitted Resident 8 on 3/11/16 with a diagnosis of Multiple Sclerosis (MS - a chronic, typically progressive disease involving damage to the sheaths of nerve cells in the brain and spinal cord, whose symptoms may include numbness, impairment of speech and of muscular coordination, blurred vision, and severe fatigue); Quadriplegia (to paralysis from the neck down, including the trunk, legs and arms); Dysphagia (difficulty or discomfort in swallowing, as a symptom of disease); and Gastrostomy status (an opening into the stomach from the abdominal wall, made surgically for the introduction of food). During a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-12-06 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe and secured medication administration and storage were practiced when: 1. Medication carts (Med Cart) A and B were left unlocked and unattended, with one insulin pen left on top of one of the medication carts. 2. One expired allergy medication and three wound gel were in the medication room ready for use These failures could have resulted to resident access to insulin, ingestion of medications inside the med cart and administration of expired medicines and had the potential for adverse consequences needing hospitalization. Findings: 1. During a concurrent observation and interview on [DATE], at 3:55 p.m., Licensed Staff R was observed with medication administration to Resident 19. Licensed Staff R checked the eMAR (electronic medication administration record), prepared the glucometer (a device used to check a resident's blood sugar), removed an insulin pen and placed the pen atop Med Cart B, moved med cart to the side of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-12-06 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to implement infection prevention and control practices when: 1) Transmission based precautions were not implemented timely for one resident (Resident 16) that was being tested for possible COVID-19. 2) Monitoring for the signs and symptoms of COVID-19 was not documented in the residents medical record for two residents (Resident 3 and Resident 16) 3) Infection Prevention (IP) Nurse was wearing PPE gown in the nursing station 4) A trash container for doffing Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) was located outside a yellow-zone resident's room 5) One resident (Resident 7) was not offered hand hygiene prior to self-administering eye drops These cumulative failures had the potential to increase the risk of transmission of communicable diseases such as the COVID-19 virus among the facility residents and staff, which may lead to severe illness and even death. Findings: 1) During an interview on 11/29/21 at 14:15 p.m., Licensed Staff I was asked how long Resident 16 had been coughing. She stated the resident has been…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-12-06 · tag F0554 — isolated
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure medication self-administration assessment was provided to one of seven residents (Resident 7) who were observed for medicine administration and had a diagnosis of dementia (a condition characterized by impairment of brain functions, such as memory loss and judgement). This failure could have resulted in expired and wrongful administration of medicine. Findings: A review of Resident 7's diagnosis indicated dementia. During a concurrent observation and interview on [DATE], at 8:54 a.m., Licensed Staff I was observed with medicine administration to Resident 7. Resident 7 was observed taking the eyedrops from the bedside table in front of her and administering them by herself. Licensed Staff I did not check how many drops were self-administered in each eye. Licensed Staff I stated Resident 7 had an order to self-administer eyedrops. A review of Resident 7's physician order dated [DATE], it indicated, Refresh Tears 0.5% eye drops (1…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-12-06 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure transfer notices were provided for two of 8 residents (Resident 18 and 8) when: 1. Resident 18 was transferred to the hospital without notifying the resident's responsible party (RP); 2. Resident 8 was transferred to the hospital without notifying the Long-term Care Ombudsman Program. These failures did not ensure necessary parties were duly notified, to advocate for residents' best interest during transfers from the facility. Findings: 1. A review of Resident 18's Clinical Notes Report dated 11/26/21 indicated, Physician L requested to have Resident 18 sent to the ED (Emergency Department) after she came back from dialysis for further evaluation of her right arm and shoulder .I informed her right away of Physician L's request and she agreed with his recommendation. Clinical notes did not indicate the RP was notified. A review of Resident 18's Capacity Form dated 11/11/21, indicated, Does not have the capacity to make healthcare decisions. During a concurrent interview and record review on 12/1/21, at 12:17 p.m.,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-12-06 · tag F0625 — isolated
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure notices of the bed hold policy were provided to two (Resident 18 and 8) of the two hospitalized residents. This failure could have resulted in residents being unaware that they could return to the facility after hospitalization, and if they needed to submit payment to reserve a bed. Findings: A review of Resident 18's Notice of Transfer and Discharge form dated 11/26/21, indicated, Bed Hold Policy informed: Bed hold decision: __Yes (agrees to pay for bed hold charge of $150/daily) __No. Bed hold policy information was not addressed. During an interview on 12/2/21, at 9:41 a.m., Management Staff M stated it was the licensed nurses' responsibility to notify residents and their responsible party of the bed hold policy when residents were transferred to the hospital. During an interview on 12/2/21, at 9:37 a.m., Management Staff A stated bed hold policy was discussed with residents and their representative or responsible party upon admission.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-12-06 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement a person-centered care plan for two of eight sampled residents (Residents 8 and 6) when: 1) The nurses did not perform pre- and post-respiratory assessments to monitor Resident 8 for improvement. This failure resulted in Resident 8 developing recurrent aspiration pneumonia (occurs when food, saliva, liquids, or vomit is breathed into the lungs or airways leading to the lungs, instead of being swallowed into the esophagus and stomach) and multiple hospitalizations. 2) The staff did not follow the activity care plan to provide opera music. This failure resulted in Resident 6 not receiving her preferred activity. Findings: 1) During a clinical record review for Resident 8, the Care Plan, not dated, indicated Resident 8 required suctioning related to increased secretions, recurrent pneumonia, neuromuscular weakness related to MS [(Multiple sclerosis); a potentially disabling disease of the brain and spinal cord] and dysphagia (difficulty or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-12-06 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to review and revise the Care Plan quarterly for one of 8 sampled residents (Resident 8) when: 1) One nurse was checking gastric residual when Resident 8 had Gastrojejunostomy (A tube placed into the stomach that passes from the stomach into the small intestine to give liquid nutrition, medications, and other fluids directly into the small intestine). This failure had the potential for disrupting the tube patency. 2) The care plan indicated for staff to offer thickened liquid to Resident 8 who was NPO (Nothing by mouth - a medical instruction meaning to withhold food and fluids by mouth). This failure had a potential for staff to give Resident 8 a thickened liquid that may lead to choking. Findings: 1) During a clinical record review for Resident 8, The Discharge Summary from the hospital dated 7/7/21 indicated Resident 8's PEG tube (Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy, or a feeding tube which is passed into a resident's stomach through the abdominal wall) was placed in 2015, and revised to GJ tube (gastrostomy-jejunostomy,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
Ownership Data Not Available

The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$15.6M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-26.4%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 0%Medicare 10%Other / private 90%

A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$441per resident / day
operating cost
$13,397per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$349per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CA

Paying with Medicaid

CMS lists this home as Medicare-certified only — it is not Medicaid-certified, so it generally cannot accept Medicaid as payment for a long-term stay. That makes it one of roughly 545 homes nationally where a Medicaid-funded placement is not an option. If you expect to rely on Medicaid, ask the home directly before you tour, and see the California Medicaid page for homes that do.

Typical monthly cost in California
$12,167/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$15,178/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,000/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 555836. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-11-18, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next