Blue Oak Post-Acute
850 Sonoma Ave, Santa Rosa, CA 95404 · For profit - Corporation · 181 certified beds · (707) 544-7750 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- a high payroll-based staffing rating (5/5)
- lower-than-typical staff turnover (18% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- CMS has flagged it for abuse
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Apr 2026
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has 2 actual-harm citations
- a high number of inspection citations overall (65) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $36,892 in federal fines (most recent 2025-12-11)
- its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 5 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 3 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 4 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 3 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 2 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 5.0% | 10.2% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 3.9% | 4.0% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 1.2% | 0.8% | 0.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.4% | 1.2% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 3.2% | 7.3% | 6.5% | better |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.4% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 0.7% | 1.6% | 3.3% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 6.3% | 9.8% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 27.7% | 13.7% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 99.3% | 98.2% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 1.5% | 4.3% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 12.2% | 10.2% | 21.2% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 26.3% | 12.0% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.0% | 1.5% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 85.9% | 93.2% | 79.4% | typical |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 29.2% | 23.0% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 12.1% | 11.2% | 12.0% | typical |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.87 | 2.25 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.60 | 1.57 | 1.80 | better |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
45.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 109 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 39.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 79 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.09 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 5% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 8% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 45.0%CMS range 34.9–54.3 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 11.7%CMS range 7.9–15.6 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 39.2% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 41.8% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 24.1% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 98.2% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 100.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 97.1% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.9% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 8.0%CMS range 4.3–12.0 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.94 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 181 beds and averages 163.3 residents a day — about 90% occupied, or roughly 18 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.44 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.56 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.13 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.05 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.60 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.59 to 0.48 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 18% is below the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
65 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 53 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-12-11 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to protect one of five sampled resident's ( Resident 1) right to be free from psychological abuse by a Certified Nursing Assistant ( CNA 1) and Unlicensed Staff 1, when Resident 1 was forced to unclog her room's toilet , which contained urine and feces, with her own gloved hands while the door to room was purposely left open.This failure made Resident 1 feel embarrassed, humiliated and victimized and negatively impacted her psychological well-being.A review of Resident 1's admission record indicated she was admitted in 05/25, with the diagnosis of Paranoid Schizophrenia (a serious mental health condition where a person has a hard time telling the difference between what is real and what is not).A review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS- a Federally Mandated assessment tool), dated 11/28/25, indicated Resident 1 had no memory impairment, no symptoms of depression, no hallucinations and no behavioral symptoms.A review of an SBAR (SBAR-Situation, Background, Assessment, Recommendation) note, dated 11/19 at 4:16 pm,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2025-01-07 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure supervision for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) when Resident 1 eloped (the act of leaving a facility unsupervised and without prior authorization) fell and sustained injuries. This failure resulted in Resident 1 sustaining a fracture (broken bone) of the left distal phalanx (a small bone on the tip of the thumb located under the nail) and abrasions (a partial loss of skin, usually due to scraping) to his face and both knees. Findings: A review of Resident 1's admission record indicated he was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including cerebral infarction (stroke- loss of blood flow to the brain). A review of Resident 1's clinical record included the following documents: A Minimum Data Set (MDS- a federally mandated resident assessment tool), dated 2/14/24, indicated Resident 1 had severe memory impairment and had impairment in both arms and legs requiring assistance with walking. A Fall Risk Assessment, dated 2/7/24, indicated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-10 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement the care plan of one of five sampled residents (Resident 1) when the care plan for a toileting program was not carried out and Resident 1's noncompliance with the toileting program did not have a care plan. This failure had the potential to impede Resident 1's ability to regain her continence and delay her readiness for discharge home. During a phone interview on 6/8/26 at 2:54 p.m., Family Member (FM) stated she had spoken with five staff members regarding Resident 1's every-two-hour toileting program including two social services staff, the Director of Nursing, an occupational therapist, and one of Resident 1's nurses. FM stated the nurse had told FM that Resident 1 had been refusing to go to the toilet every two hours per the program. FM stated she told the nurse that they can call her any time, day or night, if Resident 1 refuses, and she (FM) will tell Resident 1 that if she complies with the toileting program she will get…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-10 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility Social Services Director (SSD) failed to make a medical appointment for one of five sampled patients (Resident 1) when Resident 1 was admitted to the facility with a physician order for a neurosurgery appointment that was never carried out for eleven weeks. This failure potentially prolonged a spinal condition that caused Resident 1 to have difficulty walking, and may have been surgically corrected had Resident 1 been able to see the neurosurgeon.During a phone interview on 6/8/26 at 2:54 p.m., Family Member (FM) stated Resident 1 had an MRI (magnetic resonance imaging, a noninvasive medical imaging test that produces highly detailed, 3D cross-sectional images of the inside of the body) of her back that showed a narrowing in her spinal cord that is causing Trendelenburg gait (an abnormal walking pattern where the pelvis drops on the unsupported side when lifting one leg to step) and that Resident 1 needed a neurology consult. FM stated she had been asking about…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-05-01 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one resident in a census of 123 (Resident 2) received quality nursing care that was resident-centered and in accordance with her goals of care, as indicated in her Nursing Care Plan (a document that contains essential information about a patient's condition, diagnosis, goals, interventions, and outcomes) when she experienced a Change of Condition (sudden clinically important deviation from a patient's baseline in physical, cognitive, behavioral, or functional domains; without intervention, the deviation could lead to clinically significant complications up to and including death) at approximately 8 a.m. on [DATE], but her responsible party (RP; individual with decision-making authority regarding the patient's care) was not notified until approximately 11 a.m.This failure caused an approximate 3-hour timespan between identification of Resident 2's medical emergency to notification of her RP, preventing him from consulting family and making timely…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-16 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — patternProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY F600 The facility failed to ensure residents were free from physical abuse, including resident to resident abuse, when it did not implement effective preventative resident abuse nursing care planned interventions to prevent three resident to resident altercations for three of five sampled residents (Residents 2, 3, and 5). As a result, Resident 2 sustained head trauma to the right side and back of his head, with pain, swelling and redness; Resident 3 sustained abrasion with bleeding to his right ear, and Resident 5 sustained skin injury resulting in redness on his jaw. These failures resulted in abuse, pain, physical injuries and increased risk of psychosocial harm.A review of Resident 1's admission Record indicated he was admitted to the facility in 2017 and readmitted on [DATE] with severe mental illness disorder (a psychiatric condition characterized by significant disturbances in thinking, mood, behavior, or perception that profoundly affect a person's ability to function in daily life).A review of Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-02 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to fully implement one out of four sampled residents (Resident 3) fall care plan (CP, a detailed, written document that outlines a resident's individual needs, goals, and how their care will be managed) when Resident 3's bed was not in the lowest position as indicated on his fall CP.This failure put Resident 3 at increased risk for falls and fall related injuries.Findings:A review of Resident 3's face sheet (front page of the chart that contains a summary of basic information about the resident) indicated an admission date to the facility on 3/4/26 with diagnoses of difficulty walking and muscle weakness.A review of Resident 3's Fall CP, dated 3/31/26, indicated Resident 3 had an unwitnessed fall and one of the interventions indicated his bed was to be put in the lowest position.During a concurrent observation and interview on 4/2/26 at 3:38 p.m., sitter D and Licensed Nurse (LN) E were present in Resident 3's room. LN E confirmed Resident 3's bed was expected to be in the lowest position. Sitter D confirmed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-02 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolatedMake sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure their call light system (communication devices/system that allows residents to instantly alert nursing staff, aiding in safety, fall prevention, and resident-centered care) allowed residents to be able to directly communicate with staff when they needed assistance for two out of three sampled residents (Residents 1 and 2) when:1. Resident 1's call light volume was too low to be heard, and2. the light outside Resident 2's room, by their door, failed to illuminate upon call light use.These failures put the residents at risk for delayed provision of care and unmet needs.Findings:A review of Resident 1's face sheet (front page of the chart that contains a summary of basic information about the resident) indicated an admission date to the facility in 9/2025 with diagnoses of Parkinson's Disease (a progressive disease of the nervous system marked by tremor, muscular rigidity, and slow, imprecise movements) and Malaise (general, vague feeling of being unwell, uncomfortable, or lacking energy).A review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-07 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — patternTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide the State Survey Agency (California Department of Public Health [CDPH]) written investigation reports (an investigation conducted by the facility following the allegations of abuse) of two facility reported abuse allegations within five calendar days, for four of four sampled residents (Resident 1, Resident 2, Resident 3, and Resident 4).This failure decreased the facility's potential to ensure relevant interventions were in place and implemented to prevent further abuse and psychosocial (a combined influence of psychological [the mental and emotional state of a person] factors and the surrounding social environment on physical, emotional, and/or mental wellness) harm for Resident 1, Resident 2, Resident 3, and Resident 4.A review of a facility document dated 12/18/25, and received by CPDH on 12/18/25, indicated an allegation of suspected dependent adult/elder abuse had been made related to a resident-to-resident altercation between Resident 1 and suspected abuser [left blank .Resident 2]. A review of a facility…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-07 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident care met professional standards of practice for two of six sampled residents (Resident 1 and Resident 2) when:1: A skin assessment was not completed following the report of bruising/discoloration sustained to Resident 1's right arm after an abuse allegation, and;2: The facility did not conduct 72-hour monitoring every shift (morning [AM], evening [PM] and night shift [NOC]) following Resident 2's change of condition (COC).These failures resulted in inaccurate documentation and monitoring of Resident 1's injuries and decreased the facility's potential to ensure that consistent monitoring and safety measures were provided to Resident 2.1: A review of Resident 1's admission record indicated she was admitted to the facility in July 2025 with medical diagnosis which included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD- a chronic lung disease causing difficulty in breathing), hemiplegia (total paralysis of the arm, leg, and trunk on the same side of the body) affecting the left side, and major…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-22 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to protect the residents' right to be free of physical abuse by another resident for two of eight sampled residents (Resident 2 and Resident 3) when:1. Resident 2 was struck several times in the back of his head by Resident 1; and2. Resident 3 was struck in the head by Resident 4.These failures resulted in Resident 3 having mild facial pain and fear and had the potential to result in serious bodily harm to the residents.Findings:1. A review of Resident 1's admission record indicated he was last admitted to the facility in 3/2025 with the diagnosis of schizophrenia (a mental illness that makes it hard to tell what's real, as people with this illness may hear voices, see things that aren't there, or have unusual beliefs. It also affects thinking and emotions).A review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a federally mandated resident assessment tool), dated 9/19/25, indicated Resident 1 had no memory impairment.A review of Resident 1's progress note,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-11 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure an abuse allegation was properly investigated when the facility did not interview other residents as part of its investigation.This failure prevented the facility from identifying other residents who could have been affected. Findings:A review of the facility document titled, 5- day summary report, dated 11/25/25, indicated Resident 1 was the only resident interviewed related to the abuse allegation.During an interview on 12/10/25 at 3:36 p.m., with the Director of Behavioral Health (DBH), the DBH stated she had not interviewed other residents during the investigation, and everything that had been done during the investigation was documented on the 5-day summary report.During an interview on 12/11/25 at 3:30 p.m., with the Administrator (ADM), the ADM stated they had not interviewed other residents during the investigation. The ADM further stated, interviewing other residents was part of the policy and in principle, they should have to make sure no other residents were affected. A review of the facility policy…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 53 citations
- Potential for harm · E2025-11-25 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — patternKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents' rights to confidentiality for a census of 142 residents, when residents' meal tickets containing personal and medical information were found in a kitchen trash can.This failure decreased the facility's potential to protect the residents' personal details and health information.Findings:During a concurrent observation and interview on 9/22/25 at 9:29 a.m. with the Dietary Services Supervisor (DSS) in the kitchen, a dietary aide was scraping food off breakfast plates into a large trash can. Numerous resident meal tickets were found in the trash can along with discarded food. Trash bags were then tossed into an unsecured dumpster behind the building. DSS stated the kitchen team had always discarded the meal tickets in the trash along with uneaten food, and this had been their practice for over a year. DSS also stated she was not aware that resident meal tickets' confidential information needed to be protected, nor was she familiar with the method of shredding meal tickets. DSS further stated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-11-25 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement their medication storage policy and procedure (P&P) for a census of 142 residents, when multiple medications were not labeled and stored in a safe manner.This failure decreased the facility's potential to prevent unsafe medication administration to residents.Findings:During a concurrent observation and interview on [DATE] at 10 a.m. with Licensed Nurse 1 (LN 1), medication cart 2A was observed. The following findings were identified and confirmed by LN 1:1. Budesonide inhaler (an inhaled respiratory medication) was found open with no open date;2. Fluticasone/salmeterol Diskus (an inhaled respiratory medication) and a decongestant nasal spray were found with resident information on outer packaging only, not on the actual product;3. Beclomethasone inhaler (an inhaled respiratory medication) was found with an expiration date of 8/25 and only a room number written on it; and 4. An unidentified peach oval shaped tablet was found…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-11-25 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — patternEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow the recipe for a pureed diet (consists of foods that have been blended or mashed to a smooth, pudding-like consistency) for nine residents of a census of 142, when [NAME] 1 (C 1) did not add the correct amount of bread slices and broth cups while preparing pureed lunch for residents.This failure decreased the facility's potential to serve the right food consistency to residents with specific nutritional needs and dysphagia (difficulty swallowing).Findings:A review of the facility's menu, dated 9/24/25, indicated the lunch menu consisted of smothered pork chop, whipped potatoes, mixed vegetables, bread or roll with margarine, and lemon chiffon dessert.A review of the facility's recipe titled, Pureed Bread or Roll and Margarine (Pureed Diet Level 4 [PU4- a specialized dietary modification designed for individuals with severe dysphagia]), dated 2025, indicated the amount of white bread slices to add for 15 servings was seven and a half slices.A review of the facility's recipe titled, Pureed Smothered Pork…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-11-25 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — patternEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to accommodate five residents' (Resident 119, Resident 14, Resident 43, Resident 44, and Resident 129) food allergies, intolerances, and preferences for a census of 142, when:1.Resident 119 had lactose allergy and was served mashed potatoes with sour cream; and2.Resident 14, Resident 43, Resident 44, and Resident 129's food preferences were not served as indicated on their meal tray tickets.These failures increased the residents' potential to sustain an allergic reaction and unmet nutritional needs.Findings:1. A review of an admission record indicated Resident 119 was admitted to the facility in July 2022 with a diagnosis of lactose allergy.A review of Resident 119's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a federally mandated resident assessment tool), dated 8/4/25, indicated Resident 119 was cognitively intact.During an observation on 9/24/25 at 10:30 a.m., Prep [NAME] 1 (PC1) was preparing mashed potatoes per the facility's recipe which included sour cream.A review of the facility's recipe for mashed potatoes, dated 2025,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-11-25 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to properly prepare and store food for a census of 142 residents, when:1. Food items were found undated, unlabeled, unsealed and expired;2. Food bins were stored on a corroded metal shelf;3. One cutting board had brown stains, another contained a sticky substance, one frying pan had an oily substance and brown residue on the inside, a steam warmer tray had brown residue on the outside;4. Two insect control machines were placed on walls above a food preparation area and a toaster;5. The inside of a ceiling ventilation fan had a thick, black substance; and6. The second step of the cool down log for cooked food items was incomplete from June to September 2025.These failures increased the facility's potential to serve contaminated food and cause foodborne illnesses among vulnerable residents.Findings:1. During a concurrent observation and interview on 9/22/25 at 9:04 a.m. with the Dietary Services Supervisor (DSS), the following items were found:- In the reach-in refrigerator: a container of fresh minced garlic with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-11-25 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure proper infection control measures were implemented for a census of 142 residents, when:1. Two washing machines in the behavioral unit were found closed while not in use with moisture inside and the washing machine in station B had black spots around the door seal;2. Licensed Nurse 2 (LN 2) did not perform proper hand hygiene prior to medication preparation; and3. Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP- an infection control intervention designed to reduce the spread of multidrug-resistant organisms [MDRO]) were not followed for Resident 5, Resident 135, and Resident 4.These failures had the potential to spread infection among residents, staff, and visitors.Findings: 1.During a concurrent observation and interview on 9/25/25 at 9:05 a.m. with Director of Environmental Services (DES) in station A's laundry room in the behavioral unit, the washing machine was found not in use with the door closed and with visible moisture inside the washer. DES confirmed the washer was closed with moisture inside and stated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-11-25 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — patternMake sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure call systems (an electronic communication network that allows residents to alert staff when they need assistance) were provided for 46 residents out of a census of 142, when the residents' rooms and bathrooms in the behavioral unit (a specialized area that provides focused care for residents who have mental health disorders, substance use disorders, or complex behaviors) were found without a functioning call system. This failure decreased the facility's potential to maintain residents' safety.Findings:A review of Resident 102's admission Record, indicated Resident 102 was admitted to the facility in February 2025 with a diagnosis of schizophrenia (a mental illness that is characterized by disturbances in thought).A review of Resident 102's Minimum Data Set (MDS- a federally mandated resident assessment tool), dated 8/13/25, indicated Resident 102's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS- an assessment tool used by facilities to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-25 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure two of 31 sampled residents (Resident 28 and Resident 140) were free from abuse, when both residents were subjected to offensive language and profanity during an argument as witnessed by staff.This failure decreased the facility's potential to maintain Resident 28's and Resident 140's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being.Findings:A review of an admission record indicated Resident 28 was admitted to the facility in December 2024 with a diagnosis of recurrent depressive disorder.A review of Resident 28's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a federally mandated resident assessment tool), dated 8/16/25, indicated Resident 28 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS, an assessment tool used by facilities to screen and identify memory, orientation, and judgement status of the resident) score of 15 out of 15 with intact cognition.A review of an admission record indicated Resident 140 was admitted to the facility in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-11-25 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to accurately assess the nutritional status for one of 31 sampled residents (Resident 127), when a Minimum Data Set (MDS; an assessment tool) quarterly review indicated Resident 127 had no weight loss.This failure decreased the facility's potential to identify Resident 127's severe weight loss.Findings:A review of an admission record indicated Resident 127 was admitted to the facility in December 2016 with a diagnosis of type two diabetes mellitus (DM-a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound healing).During an observation on 9/22/25 at 9:59 a.m. in Resident 127's room, Resident 127 was observed lying in bed on his side facing away from an untouched meal tray.A review of Resident 127's medical record (MR), indicated Resident 127's weight was 193.8 pounds (a unit of measure) on 1/1/25 with a severe weight loss of 16.82 percent (%; a unit of measure) in six months. MR further indicated Resident 127's weight…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-25 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure professional standards of care were followed for enteral feeding and medication administration for one of 31 sampled residents (Resident 132), when:1. Resident 132's physician's order for enteral (involving or passing through the intestine, either naturally via the mouth and esophagus, or through an artificial opening) feeding was incomplete, without start and stop times, and lacked medication administration and flushing instructions; and2. Licensed Nurse 3 (LN 3) did not follow the facility's policy during medication administration through a gastrostomy tube (G-tube; a surgical opening fitted with a device to allow feedings to be administered directly into the stomach, common for people with swallowing problems).This failure increased Resident 132's risk for inconsistent enteral feeding times, increased residual, and potential tube clogging.Findings:A review of Resident 132's admission Record, indicated Resident 132 was admitted to the facility in October 2012 with diagnoses including enterocolitis…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-25 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure an enteral feeding (a method of providing nutrition directly into the stomach through a surgically placed tube) was administered as per physician's order for one of 31 sampled residents (Resident 33), when Resident 33's feeding pump was observed off during scheduled feeding times.This failure increased Resident 33's potential for malnutrition (an imbalance between the nutrients your body needs to function and the nutrients it gets) and dehydration (occurs when the body uses or loses more fluid than it takes in).Findings:A review of Resident 33's admission record indicated he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including dysphagia (difficulty swallowing) and a gastrostomy tube (g-tube, a device to allow feedings to be administered directly to the stomach, common for people with swallowing problems). During an observation on 9/23/25 at 9:24 a.m. with Resident 33 in his room, Resident 33's tube feeding pump was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-11-25 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide respiratory care services according to professional standards of quality for one of 31 sampled residents (Resident 28), when Resident 28's administered oxygen was not consistent with the physician's order.This failure decreased the facility's potential to follow the physician's order when providing respiratory services.Findings:A review of an admission record indicated Resident 28 was admitted to the facility in December 2024 with a diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD, a chronic lung disease causing difficulty in breathing).A review of Resident 28's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a federally mandated resident assessment tool), dated 8/16/25, indicated Resident 28 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS, an assessment tool used by facilities to screen and identify memory, orientation, and judgement status of the resident) score of 15 out of 15 with intact cognition.During a concurrent observation and interview on 9/22/25 at 10:33 a.m. with Resident 28, Resident 28 was observed in bed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-11-25 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure accurate documentation, disposition, and storage of controlled medications for one of 31 sampled residents (Resident 135), when:1. Resident 135's controlled drug was found in a sealed plastic bag stored inside a general medication drawer in the medication cart; and 2. Resident 135's Controlled Drug Record (CDR-a paper log of controlled drug removal for administration to residents) did not match the actual medication count.These failures had the potential to contribute to unsafe controlled medication handling and/or risk of controlled drug diversion.Findings:1.A review of Resident 135's admission record indicated she was admitted to the facility on 8/25 with diagnoses including closed fracture (break in the bone) and an anxiety disorder.A review of Resident 135's Order Listing Report, dated 9/25/25, indicated an order for clonazepam (a controlled medication for anxiety) 0.5 milligrams (mg- a unit of measurement), give two tablets one time a day and one tablet at bedtime.During a concurrent observation…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-11-25 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — isolatedDispose of garbage and refuse properly.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to properly dispose garbage for a census of 142 residents, when a kitchen garbage dumpster was found to have two warped lids. This failure had the potential to produce unsanitary conditions for residents due to easy access for rodents and other pests.Findings:During a concurrent observation and interview on 9/22/25 at 9:17 a.m. with the Maintenance Director (MD) at the kitchen dumpsters, one garbage dumpster's lids were separated at the midline, leaving a one inch (a unit of measure) gap between the lids. Three flies were hovering at the gap. MD stated it was a pest problem because insects and rodents could access the dumpster. A review of the facility's document titled, Garbage and Trash, dated 2023, indicated, Adequate, clean, vermin-proof areas must be provided for storage of garbage . and that the lids are closed.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-25 · tag F0887 — isolatedEducate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain record of Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccination status for one of two sampled staff (Certified Nursing Assistant 2; CNA 2), when CNA 2 was not provided an education regarding COVID-19 vaccination and the refusal of the vaccine was not documented.This failure decreased the facility's potential to assess staffs' vaccination status against infectious disease.Findings:During a concurrent interview and record review on 9/25/25 at 11:02 a.m. with Director of Staff Development (DSD), CNA 2's employee record was reviewed. DSD confirmed CNA 2 did not have COVID-19 vaccination record on file. DSD stated COVID-19 vaccine was offered to CNA 2 and CNA 2 declined. DSD further stated education regarding COVID-19 vaccination was not provided and CNA 2's refusal of vaccine was not documented. A review of the facility's policy titled, Employee Infection and Vaccination Status, revised January 2024, indicated, Employees are provided with educational materials to make informed decisions for . vaccinations. If declined, a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-08 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to prevent abuse for one resident (Resident 1) of two sampled residents when Resident 2 threw water at Resident 1.This failure resulted in Resident 1 having had water thrown at him.Findings:A review of an admission record indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included respiratory failure, hemiplegia (paralysis of one side of the body) and hemiparesis (partial weakness of one side of the body) after a stroke, and major depressive disorder.A review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (an assessment tool) dated 6/18/25 indicated a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS, an assessment of cognitive function (the mental processes the brain uses to perceive, learn, remember, reason)) score of 12 which meant Resident 1's cognition was moderately intact.A review of an admission record indicated Resident 2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included stroke, anxiety disorder (a mental health condition…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-22 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to honor the right to self-determination (making own decisions) nor ensured one out of three sampled residents (Resident 1) was treated with respect and dignity, when Licensed Nurse (LN) B touched Resident 1 without consent.This failure resulted in Resident 1 feeling she was not treated with respect and dignity and that her rights were violated.Findings:A review of Resident 1s face sheet (front page of the chart that contains a summary of basic information about the resident) indicated she was admitted to the facility in April of 2025 and was self-responsible (taking ownership of one's actions and decisions).During an interview on 7/22/25 at 3:00 p.m., Resident 1 stated there was an incident when LN B had dragged her from the floor in the hallway back to her bed. Resident 1 stated at the time of incident, she was in a lot of pain and had laid down on a blanket in the hallway, as she believed it would help relieve her pain. Resident 1 stated LN B had grabbed her on the side by her armpits and dropped her onto her bed.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-22 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure an abuse allegation was reported timely, not later than two hours, for one out of three sampled residents (Resident 1), when an allegation of abuse was made on 7/7/25 but wasn't reported to the local police department until 7/8/25.This failure could result in continued harm and further abuse.Findings:A review of the report of suspected dependent adult/elder abuse, dated 7/7/25, indicated Resident 1 reported an allegation of physical abuse against Licensed Nurse (LN) B.A review of the Interdisciplinary team (IDT, a group of health care professionals with various areas of expertise who work together toward the goals of the residents) note, dated 7/14/25, indicated Resident 1 reported the physical abuse allegation on 7/7/25 at 3:10 p.m.During an interview on 7/22/25 at 2:35 p.m., the Director of Nursing (DON) stated abuse allegations should be reported to California Department of Public Health (CDPH, state licensing), the Ombudsman (an advocate…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-22 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were secured and inaccessible to unauthorized staff and residents when one medication cart was left unlocked and unattended.This failure had the potential to put all 95 facility residents at risk for unauthorized access to and ingestion of unsecured medications.Findings:During an observation on 7/22/25 at 2:26 p.m., one medication cart was not locked while unattended. There was no nurse in sight. During a concurrent observation and interview on 7/22/25 at 2:29 p.m., a nurse came and locked the medication cart. Licensed Nurse (LN) A verified she left station 1B medication cart unlocked to go with the Director of Nursing (DON) inside the medication room. LN A stated medication cart should be kept locked at all times when unattended to ensure there was no unauthorized access to the medications inside the cart. LN A stated keeping the medication cart locked when unattended was for resident and staff safety. During an interview on 7/22/25 at 2:50 p.m., the DON stated she knew about one of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-08 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the preservation of dignity for one of two sampled residents (Resident 1), when Resident 1 was left on a soiled bedpan (a medical device used to collect urine or feces for individuals who are unable to leave their bed to use a regular toilet) for hours without any response to his multiple call light (typically a light or bell used in healthcare setting to notify staff that a resident requires assistance) activation attempts to get assistance from facility staff. These failures resulted in Resident 1 being made to endure an undignified experience being left for hours, on a soiled bedpan, feeling helpless and embarrassed with an increased potential for skin breakdown. Findings: A review of Resident 1 ' s face sheet (front page of the chart that contains a summary of basic information about the resident) indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility in April 2025, for surgery aftercare following a right lower leg fracture, with a history of falling, and difficulty walking. During an interview on 5/8/25 at 3:34 p.m.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-16 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete and provide a timely investigation report for one of two resident abuse allegation incidents (Resident 1) to the Department. This failure subjected Resident 1 to the potential reoccurrence of abuse, and lack of information had the potential to hamper the Department's ability to intervene, should protective actions be required to ensure the safety of the 60 other vulnerable residents in the facility. Findings: A review of the Intake Information, dated 3/27/25, indicated an allegation of Resident 1 not being treated with dignity and respect by a facility staff member. During an interview on 4/16/25 at 12:05 p.m., Administrator A stated he investigated the allegation Resident 1 made against Housekeeper B but did not send a five-day follow-up Investigation Report to the Department. Administrator A stated he referred to an AFL (All Facilities Letter, or a State letter of communication to providers) and a Mandated Reporter (healthcare professionals have a legal duty to report suspected cases of abuse or neglect) Chart,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-29 · tag F0685 — isolatedAssist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one resident (Resident 1) received proper treatment to maintain hearing abilities, when the facility did not arrange for suitable transportation to a scheduled hearing appointment. This failure resulted in a delay of treatment for a period of five months and a decreased quality of life for Resident 1. Findings: During an interview on 3/28/24 at 4:58 PM, Family Member 1 (FM 1) stated Resident 1 (R1) needed a hearing assessment. The regular driver was not at the facility. FM 1 stated the Social Services Assistant (SSA) informed her the facility contracted with a transport company. FM 1 further stated that R1 missed an appointment for a hearing assessment because her wheelchair did not fit in the transport van. FM 1 stated the next available appointment was not until August. During an interview on 3/29/24 at 11:05 AM, R1 stated she had been anxious to get hearing aids. R1 further stated her quality of life had been affected because she had a hard…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-11-17 · tag F0557 — patternHonor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were treated with dignity and respect, when: 1. Unlicensed Staff D was observed assisting Resident 137 with meals, in the standing position; 2. Unlicensed Staff E and Unlicensed Staff F were observed chatting in the facility's hallway adjacent to the dining room, speaking a language other than English during lunch time, and; 3. Licensed Nurse G was observed texting in her personal cellphone during regular work hours. These findings had the potential to result in loss of dignity, and feelings of neglect and frustration for the residents of the facility. Findings: 1. Record review indicated Resident 137 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with medical diagnoses including Malignant Neoplasm of Temporal Lobe (Brain cancer) and Pulmonary Hypertension (A type of high blood pressure that affects the arteries in the lungs and the right side of the heart), according to the facility Face Sheet (Facility demographic). During a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-11-17 · tag F0574 — patternThe resident has the right to receive notices in a format and a language he or she understands.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure 13 of 13 sampled residents (Resident 44, Resident 61, Resident 81, Resident 63, Resident 34, Resident 93, Resident 23, Resident 112, Resident 10, Resident 85, Resident 98, Resident 80 and Resident 120), who attended the Resident Council meeting on 11/15/23 at 10 a.m., knew where to find the information to file a complaint with the State Department. This failure had the potential to result in lack of ability to advocate for their care at the facility, and poor quality of care. Findings: During the Resident Council meeting on 11/15/23 at 10 a.m., all 13 residents who attended the meeting (Resident 44, Resident 61, Resident 81, Resident 63, Resident 34, Resident 93, Resident 23, Resident 112, Resident 10, Resident 85, Resident 98, Resident 80 and Resident 120), were asked if they knew how to file a complaint with the State Department. All 13 residents stated not knowing how to do this. The 13 residents were asked if they had been notified where to find the information to file a complaint with the State. They all stated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-11-17 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure the sliding doors and the sliding screens on five of six resident rooms (Rooms 115, 214, 218, 317, 321) were intact and in good working conditions. This failure created a safety hazard for the residents at the facility and exposed them to insects and pests. Findings: During an observation and interview on 11/17/23, at 8:45 a.m., with the Director of Maintenance (DM), the sliding screen on room [ROOM NUMBER] that led to the outside was not operational (off its rails). During an observation and interview on 11/17/23, at 8:58 a.m., with the DM, the sliding door on room [ROOM NUMBER] that led to the outside did not close completely and did not lock. During an observation and interview on 11/17/23, at 9:02 a.m., with the DM, the screen in the sliding door on room [ROOM NUMBER] that led to the outside did not close completely leaving gaps of 1-2 inch. During an observation and interview on 11/17/23, at 9:08 a.m., with the DM, the screen in the sliding…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-17 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — patternTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the safety of 14 residents (Resident 210, Resident 140, Resident 202, Resident 92, Resident 7, Resident 203, Resident 118, Resident 442, Resident 4, Resident 60, Resident 37, Resident 301, Resident 302, Resident 303), when nine Facility-Reported Incidents of resident abuse, were not reported to authorities within two hours after the allegation was reported. This failure to report allegations of abuse within the Federally-mandated requirement of two hours, had the potential to contribute to ongoing resident abuse, physical harm and the potential for mental and emotional harm. Findings: During an interview with Licensed Staff on 11/16/23, at 10:35 AM, Licensed Staff U stated any report of abuse was to be reported immediately to authorities, but no later than 24 hours, per facility Policy and Procedure. During an interview and concurrent document review with Licensed Staff T, on 11/16/23, at 10:40 AM, he stated abuse reporting was supposed to occur…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-17 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure two of 10 sampled residents (Resident 137 and Resident 22) had resident-centered comprehensive care plans when: 1. Resident 137, who was in palliative care (A type of medical care aimed at optimizing quality of life and mitigating suffering among people with serious, complex, and often terminal illnesses), did not have a resident-centered comprehensive care plan for pain/discomfort that was resident-specific and included nonpharmacological interventions (Interventions to help relieve pain not consisting of medications), and; 2. Resident 22, who had a left lower leg surgical wound, did not have a comprehensive care plan for care of the wound. These findings had the potential to result in insufficient information and lack of guidance to attain and maintain the residents' highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being, poor quality of care, and suffering. Findings: 1. Record review indicated Resident 137 was admitted…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-11-17 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 7 sampled residents (Resident 137), received assistance with Activities of Daily Living (ADLs-Activities related to personal care such as dressing, bathing and toileting) such as incontinence care (Cleaning the skin and changing the soiled undergarments and clothing of people with bowel or bladder incontinence [inability to control urination and defecation])., bed repositioning and bathing, as needed. This failure had the potential to result in feelings of neglect, frustration, shame, and skin breakdown for Resident 137. Findings: Record review indicated Resident 137 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with medical diagnoses including Malignant Neoplasm of Temporal Lobe (Brain cancer) and Pulmonary Hypertension (A type of high blood pressure that affects the arteries in the lungs and the right side of the heart), according to the facility Face Sheet (Facility demographic). Record review of Resident 137's MDS (Minimum Data Set-An…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-11-17 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — patternProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 7 sampled residents (Resident 49) was kept comfortable when she experienced pain of 10/10 (Pain scale where 10 is the worst pain experienced in a person's lifetime, and 0 is no pain) for a prolonged period of time, and the assigned nurse (Licensed Staff R) did not transfer her to the hospital despite multiple verbal requests by Resident 49, until more than two hours after the pain started. In addition, Licensed Staff R did not document administering any medications to treat Resident 49's pain. This caused Resident 49 a lot of suffering, and had the potential to result serious harm, including death to Resident 49. Findings: Record review indicated Resident 49 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with medical diagnoses including Multiple Sclerosis (A potentially disabling disease of the brain and spinal cord that causes many different symptoms, including vision loss, pain, fatigue, and impaired coordination) and Muscle Weakness…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-11-17 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — patternProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure there was enough staff available to meet the needs of residents, when call lights were not answered promptly. During a Resident Council Meeting, three of 13 sampled residents (Resident 81, Resident 85 & Resident 93) complained the call lights were taking more than ten minutes to be answered. One resident indicated the call light took up to an hour to be answered. In addition, family members of Resident 137 also stated the call light took a long time to be answered. These findings had the potential to result in inability for residents to obtain assistance when needed, decreased resident satisfaction and safety, and poor perception of health care quality. Findings: During an interview on 11/15/23 at 10:12 a.m., during a Resident Council Meeting, Resident 81 and Resident 85 stated call lights took a long time to be answered. They stated, at nighttime, sometimes it took 10 to 15 minutes for staff to respond. Resident 93, who was also present, stated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-11-17 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure food was prepared and stored in accordance with professional standards of food service safety, when the roast beef was not cooled down (a processing technique used to reduce the temperature of the food from one processing temperature to another or to a required storage temperature) properly. This failure could put residents at risk for foodborne illness due to growth of bacteria and microorganisms. Findings: Potentially Hazardous Foods (PHFs) are those capable of supporting bacterial growth associated with foodborne illness. Cooked meat is considered a PHF and requires time/temperature control for food safety. Cooked meats must be cooled from 135 F to 70 F within two hours and to 41 F within an additional four hours, not to exceed a total timeframe of six hours. A review of the facility's menu for Tuesday indicated the facility was serving roast beef for dinner. During an observation on 11/14/23 at 11:30 a.m., there were four pieces, each weighing approximately five pounds, of cooked roast beef, on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-11-17 · tag F0850 — failed to provide social-work services — patternHire a qualified full-time social worker in a facility with more than 120 beds.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to have a Social Services Director with the qualifications required by the Federal regulations, since April of 2023. This finding had the potential to result in inability to provide medically-related Social Services to the residents of the facility and poor quality of care. Findings: During an interview on 11/15/23 at 2:38 p.m., the Administrator stated the facility currently did not have a Social Services Director, but a new employee, currently working as a Social Services Assistant, would be appointed the Social Services Director position as soon as she obtained her Bachelor's Degree, which was expected to happen in the summer of 2024. The Administrator stated the last Social Services Director left her position in April of 2023. During a second interview with the Administrator on 11/17/23 at 3:06 p.m., he stated the Social Services Assistant who would be appointed the Social Services Director, would be getting her Bachelor's Degree in Social Work in about a month. Record review of the facility job description for Social…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-11-17 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — patternMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure the televisions (TVs) of five of five residents (Resident 78, 81, 34, 23 & 85) worked properly. In addition, the call bells of two of two residents (Resident 33 & 78) did not work properly either. These failures prevented the residents from watching the TV channels they liked and placed other residents at risk of not being able to watch the channels of their preference. These failures also placed Resident 33 and Resident 78 at risk of not being able to get the help or assistance they needed, due to the malfunctioning call bells, which could have resulted in harm and neglect. Findings: During an interview on 11/17/23, at 8:45 a.m., Resident 78 stated he liked to watch TV but stated Channel 5 did not work and Channel 12 (CNN) had no sound. During a concurrent observation, the Director of Maintenance (DM) tested Resident 78's TV and confirmed what Resident 78 reported. During an interview on 11/17/23, at 8:52 a.m., Resident 81 stated she liked to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-11-17 · tag F0943 — patternGive their staff education on dementia care, and what abuse, neglect, and exploitation are; and how to report abuse, neglect, and exploitation.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the safety of six residents (Resident #7, Resident #203, Resident #202, Resident #92, Resident #201, Resident #140), when they did not have an effective abuse prevention program which provided staff with updated reporting information. This failure to have the correct information available to staff for orientation, yearly in-service and availability in the nursing stations, resulted in delayed reporting of abuse. Findings: (Refer F609) During an interview with Licensed Staff on 11/16/23, at 10:35 AM, Licensed Staff U stated any report of abuse was to be reported immediately to authorities, but no later than 24 hours, per facility Policy and Procedure. During an interview and concurrent document review with Licensed Staff T, on 11/16/23, at 10:40 AM, Licensed Staff T stated abuse reporting was supposed to occur immediately but needed to be reported in 24 hours. During a review of a binder titled, Abuse, no date, a document titled, Mandated Reporter, indicated multiple abuse situation timelines: Immediately, 2 hours,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-17 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure the physician was notified for a significant weight loss (5% in 1 month, 10% in 3 months and 7.5 % in 6 months) for one out of two sampled residents (Resident 38). This failure had the potential to further aggravate and compromise his medical status. Findings: A review of Resident 38's face sheet (demographics) indicated he was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His diagnoses included Essential Hypertension (occurs when you have abnormally high blood pressure that is not the result of a medical condition), Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (a disease that occurs when your blood glucose, also called blood sugar, is too high), and Congenital stenosis and stricture of esophagus (an intrinsic narrowing of the esophagus, the organ that food travels through to reach the stomach for further digestion, present at birth) His Minimum Data Sheet Assessment (MDS, a federally-mandated process for clinical assessment of all residents in Medicare and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-17 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident was free from abuse for one out of two sampled residents (Resident 118), when another resident (Resident 442) hit him on his face three times with open palm and one time with a closed fist. This failure led Resident 118 feeling in pain and afraid. This failure could also result in injury. Findings: A review of Resident 118's face sheet (demographics) indicated he was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His diagnoses included Essential Hypertension (occurs when you have abnormally high blood pressure that is not the result of a medical condition), Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (a disease that occurs when your blood glucose, also called blood sugar, is too high), Hemiplegia (one-sided muscle paralysis- the inability to move part of your body or weakness) and Hemiparesis (weakness or the inability to move on one side of the body, making it hard to perform everyday activities like eating or dressing). His Minimum Data Sheet…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-17 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to timely complete a nutritional assessment by a Registered Dietician for one of three residents (Resident 131) at risk for malnutrition. Resident 131 was admitted with a Body Mass Index (BMI - a nutritional status indicator) score of 15.1 (BMI scores less than 16.5 indicate severely underweight). The Registered Dietician assessment was completed ten days after admission. This failure placed Resident 131 at risk of suffering complications from being underweight. Findings: A review of Resident 131's facesheet indicated she was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with an admitting diagnosis of cerebral infarction (stroke). A review of Resident 131's, Weight Summary, record indicated Resident 131 was 5 feet and 2.5 inches tall and weighed 83.8 pounds on 6/14/23, the first recorded weight after admission. Resident 131's Body Mass Index (BMI - a scientific indicator of body fat/nutrition calculated with a formula that uses weight divided by height) on 6/14/23,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-17 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure residents who require dialysis, receive such services consistent with professional standards of practice, for one out of two sampled residents (Resident 8), when staff were not regularly assessing the hemodialysis (HD, a treatment used to filter wastes and water from your blood) access site on his left arm. This failure could result in staff not being able to detect infection, bleeding or a failed HD access site. Findings: A review of Resident 8's face sheet (demographics) indicated he was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His diagnoses included Essential Hypertension (occurs when you have abnormally high blood pressure that is not the result of a medical condition), Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (a disease that occurs when your blood glucose, also called blood sugar, is too high), and Stage 4 Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD, the kidneys are moderately or severely damaged and are not working as well as they should to filter waste from your…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-17 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolatedEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure: 1. the menu was followed for a pureed (a paste or thick liquid suspension usually made from cooked food ground finely) diet, when the cook did not follow the menu instruction while preparing a pureed meatball, for two out of two sampled residents (Residents 58 and 137); and, 2. the development of a plant-based menu. These failures had the potential to alter the taste of the food when not following the menu and residents not meeting the recommended daily intake (RDI, the average daily dietary intake level that is sufficient to meet the nutrient requirements of nearly all (97-98 per cent) healthy individuals in a particular life stage and gender group) for certain nutrients like protein or vitamins, which could further compromise their medical status. Findings: A review of Resident 58's face sheet (demographics) indicated she was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included Essential Hypertension (occurs…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-17 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolatedProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure food was prepared and stored in accordance with professional standards of food service safety, when the roast beef was not cooled down (a processing technique that is used to reduce the temperature of the food from one processing temperature to another or to a required storage temperature) properly. This failure could put residents at risk for foodborne illness due to growth of bacteria and microorganisms. Findings: A review of the facility's menu for Tuesday indicated it would be serving roast beef for dinner. During an observation on 11/14/23 at 11:30 a.m., there were large portions of cooked roast beef on two large trays, cooling down. The smaller portion roast beef had a temperature of 174 Fahrenheit (F, a scale for measuring temperature, in which water freezes at 32 degrees and boils at 212 degrees) and the large roast beef temperature was 170 F. During an observation on 11/14/23 at 12:48 p.m., the temperature for the roast beef was 136 F and 128 F. During a concurrent observation and interview…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-17 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure it offered COVID-19 immunizations and education to two of five residents (Residents 11 and 61) and failed to ensure it had a COVID-19 Policy and Procedure available for consultation and reference. These failures placed facility residents at risk for COVID-19. Findings: During an interview and record review on 11/17/23, at 10:09 a.m., the Infection Preventionist (IP) stated Resident 11 had been admitted to the facility on [DATE], and Resident 61 on 7/19/23. The IP stated both were still residents at the facility. The IP was asked for documentary evidence both residents were offered and provided COVID-19 vaccines and education. The IP reviewed the clinical record of both residents. The IP stated there were no records of Resident 11's COVID-19 immunizations. The IP stated there was a note in the record indicating Resident 11 refused a COVID-19 vaccine on 2/16/23. The IP stated there was no record that Resident 11 was provided education about…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-17 · tag F0887 — isolatedEducate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain documentation of COVID-19 vaccination status of two of five staff members (Licensed Staff G and Unlicensed Staff Q). This failure placed residents at risk of COVID-19. Findings: A review of the facility's staffing sheet for 11/17/23, indicated Licensed Staff G and Unlicensed Staff Q were scheduled to work at the facility. During an interview and record review on 11/16/23, at 11:17 a.m., the Infection Preventionist (IP) stated Licensed Staff G was hired on 8/25/23, and Unlicensed Staff Q was hired on 9/20/23. The IP was asked for documentation of their vaccination status. The IP reviewed their personnel records and stated the facility had no records of their COVID-19 vaccinations. During an interview on 11/17/23, at 11:37 a.m., the IP stated she contacted Licensed Staff G and Unlicensed Staff Q and asked for their COVID-19 vaccination status. During an interview on 11/17/23, at 11:39 a.m., the IP was asked for the facility's policy and procedure on screening staff for COVID-19 and stated documentation of COVID-19…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-17 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — isolatedKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure the kitchen walls were in good repair, when cracks and holes in the walls were noted during rounds. This failure could result in rodents and pests accessing the kitchen area through these cracks and holes which could put residents at risk for harmful diseases. Findings: During an observation on 11/14/23 at 9:56 a.m., there was a crack in the wall in the area by the manual dishwasher sink. There were also multiple holes in the wall underneath the sink/drying area near the dishwashing machine and a crack in the wall beside the area where staff would hand wash cutlery and glasses. During a concurrent observation and interview on 11/14/23 at 10:27 a.m., the Maintenance Supervisor stated they usually did environmental rounds outside the facility but not inside the facility unless staff told them to fix something. The Maintenance Supervisor stated they did not have an environmental rounds form. The Maintenance Supervisor was shown the areas in the kitchen where there were holes and cracks. The Maintenance…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-02-07 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — patternHonor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility did not ensure eight residents (Residents, 109, 112, 113, 11, 76, 18, 59, and 128) were offered the opportunity to choose whether they wanted condiments or substitute foods during meal service. The failure to ask residents or their families about things important to their lives and how they enjoyed their food, had the potential for each resident, who did not like their food, to not eat and potentially experience weight loss, or depression. Findings: During an observation on 1/31/22 at at 12:20 p.m., lunch trays were delivered to seven resident rooms, by Unlicensed Staff F and Unlicensed Staff G. Unlicensed Staff F, who set-up the trays for the residents, did not ask any of the residents whether they wanted condiments, if the food was to their liking or if the residents wanted to have a substitutions. During an interview on 2/2/22, at 10:20 a.m., Resident 128 stated he missed home cooking. He stated he was never asked about salt or pepper or if he wanted something different to eat. He stated no one had asked him if he liked the food…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-02-07 · tag F0640 — patternEncode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation, and record review, the facility did not ensure seven Residents' (Resident 129, Resident 112, Resident 71, Resident 3, Resident 1, Resident 1A, and Resident 1B), Minimum Data Set Documentation (The MDS is a health status screening and assessment tool used for all residents, to ensure that facilities have provided resident-specific information for payment and quality measure purposes, and to enable a facility to better monitor each resident's decline and progress over time. Computer-aided data analysis facilitates a more efficient, comprehensive and sophisticated review of health data) was completed and submitted, according to the regulations. The facility's failure to completely assess each resident's preferences, capabilities and goals of care, as part of a time-dependent and ongoing Comprehensive Assessment process, had the potential to result in resident harm from missed assessments of weight loss, missed identification of resident preferences and needs, and care plans that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-02-07 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — patternDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility did not ensure resident care plans were reviewed, revised and updated, at least every three months, for 9 residents (Residents 71, 113, 128, 135, 40, 11, 9, 19, and 93). This failure to follow the Policy and Procedure (P&P) for Care Planning, had the potential for these residents to not receive the care and services necessary to meet their physical, psychosocial and functional needs. Findings: During a record review on 1/31/22, for Resident 128, a document titled, admission Record, indicated he was admitted [DATE], with diagnoses that included, Hemiplegia and Hemiparesis Following Cerebral Infarction Affecting Right Dominant Side, (When blood supply is blocked to the brain, paralysis of one side of the body may occur), Myocardial Infarction, (Blood supply to the parts of the heart is blocked causing tissue to die), Major Depressive Disorder, (A mental disorder lasting at least two weeks, where someone experiences pervasive low mood, low self-esteem,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-02-07 · tag F0730 — patternObserve each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility did not ensure Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs) were provided at least 12 hours a year of in-services annually. The failure to provide education in-service for CNAs had the potential to result in resident harm from cross-contamination and infection by staff who did not know how to properly don and doff Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) and when to engage in hand hygiene after contact with residents and their surroundings. Findings: During an observation in the Red Zone (Area in quarantine as having Covid Positive residents), on 1/31/22, at 12:20 p.m., staff were donning (putting on) and doffing (taking off) gowns and gloves while passing resident lunch trays to residents in their rooms. Unlicensed Staff F donned a gown and gloves before entering a resident room with a lunch tray. Unlicensed Staff F delivered the lunch tray to the resident in bed one, removed the tray warmer lid, pushed the tray table closer to the resident and then walked to the doorway and handed the tray warmer lid to Unlicensed Staff G.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-02-07 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to: 1A. Ensure 3 of 3 refrigerated insulin injections (Basaglar, Victoza and Admelog) were stored at the temperature required to maintain their overall safety and effectiveness. This failure had the potential to reduce the efficacy of the medication, from exposure to excessively low temperatures, thereby being potentially ineffective to residents receiving insulin. 1B. Ensure 1 of 3 medication refrigerators was monitored for an acceptable temperature for refrigerated medications. This failure had the potential to reduce the efficacy of the medication, from exposure to excessively low or excessively high temperatures, thereby being potentially ineffective to residents receiving these medications. 2. Ensure that 2 of 2 vials of refrigerated Tuberculin Purified Protein Derivative (PPD) (also known as Tubersol - used in a skin test to help diagnose tuberculosis (TB) infection) were stored according to manufacturer's recommendations. This failure had the potential to result in an inaccurate reading for every…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-02-07 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — patternHave a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and document review, the facility's Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement committee (QAPI) failed to identify and develop a QAPI Plan (A QAPI plan is the written plan containing the process that will guide the facility's efforts in assuring care and services are maintained at acceptable levels of performance and continually improved. The plan describes how the facility will conduct its required QAPI and QAA committee functions. The facility is required to develop a QAPI plan), and implement Performance Improvement Plans to address: 1. Residents' food preferences for seasonings or substitutions. (Reference F561) 2. Required resident assessment and documentation completion and submission, according to policy and procedure. (Reference F640 3. Resident Care plan reviews and updates to reflect resident needs. (Reference F657) 4. Staffing vacancies to address orientation, competency and mandatory in-service hours for Unlicensed Staff. (Reference 730) 5. Medication refrigeration safety. (Reference F761) 6. Infection Prevention program designed to prevent the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-02-07 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure an Infection Prevention Program was followed to prevent transmission of communicable diseases and did not follow its Policy and Procedure (P&P) when: 1. Screening Visitors and Staff for Covid Symptoms, before entering the facility; 2. a) Donning and doffing (putting on and taking off) Personal Protective Equipment (PPE); b) Staff did not follow its P&P for hand hygiene; and, 3. Trash cans were not placed inside resident rooms, in the Red Zone. These failures to follow Infection Prevention P&P had the potential for resident harm and possible death from cross-contamination and infection. Findings: 1. During an observation on 1/31/22, at 9 a.m., Unlicensed Staff K was behind a desk and used a laser thermometer to determine body temperature of incoming visitors. She scanned a visitor's forehead with the thermometer equipment and stated the temperature to the visitor. The visitor made a notation in a binder at the desk. Unlicensed Staff K did not ask the visitor any questions or document anything in the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-02-07 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one resident (Resident 441) was free from abuse when they did not follow its Policy and Procedure (P&P) for assessment, monitoring or documenting allegations of abuse by Resident 441. This failure had the potential for harm, when Resident 441 was not assessed for physical harm or monitored for safety or signs of psychosocial harm. Findings: Resident 441 was admitted to the facility 9/8/21, for diagnoses that included Stroke (Blood supply to brain was limited causing brain damage), Diabetes (High levels of sugar in the blood over a prolonged period of time), Dysphagia (Difficulty swallowing), and adjustment disorder with Mixed Anxiety and Depressed Mood (Stress related conditions resulting in depression). During an interview on 2/3/22, at 11:05 a.m., the Social Services Director (SSD) stated she remembered an incident Resident 441 reported to her about an Unlicensed Staff member speaking rudely to her. She stated she remembered Resident 441 came to her office and stated Unlicensed Staff had been verbally, Rough. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-02-07 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to implement care plan interventions to monitor a resident with a known history of elopement attempts, for one of three residents (Resident 54). This failure resulted in Resident 54 leaving the building, unsupervised, in the early hours of the morning on 8/8/21, putting Resident 54 at risk for serious injury or death. Findings: Resident 54 was 78 year's-old with a BIMS score of 5 (BIMS stands for Brief Interview for Mental Status and is used to see how a person is cognitively functioning. A score of 0-7 shows severe cognitive impact), a history of Dementia (a term used for the impaired ability to remember, think or make decisions and interferes with doing everyday tasks), Muscle weakness (a decrease in strength of one or more muscles in the body), Delirium (serious disturbance in mental abilities resulting in confused thinking and reduced awareness of surroundings), Depression (serious medical illness which negatively affects how you feel,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2022-02-07 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — widespreadConduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility did not provide a current Facility Assessment. The failure to conduct, assess and document the resources needed to care for facility residents, had the potential for resident harm if staffing, resident care, and equipment were not provided, as needed. Findings: During an interview with the Administrator, on 1/31/22 at 10 a.m., a request was made to review the most current copy of a document titled, Facility Assessment. During an interview with the Administrator, on 2/1/22, at 3 p.m., a second request was made to review the most current copy of a document titled, Facility Assessment. He stated he was unaware of what a Facility Assessment was. During an interview and record review with the Administrator, on 2/4/22, 10 a.m., he stated the most recent copy of a Facility Assessment he had, was 2019. He stated there was no Facility Assessment conducted or documented for 2020 and 2021, as he was unaware of the requirement for a facility to have one. A review of the document titled, Facility Assessment Tool, dated 8/18/17, indicated,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$36,892 in federal fines across 2 penalties.
- $28,614 — penalty dated 2025-12-11
- $8,278 — penalty dated 2025-01-07
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| JOSE, JOSEKUTTY | Individual | DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER; ADP OF THE SNF | since 03/01/2023 |
| MATALON, ERAN | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/01/2002 |
| ROSE, MEGAN | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 03/01/2023 |
| SURATOS, RAUL | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 09/16/2024 |
| TRASK, APRIL | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 03/01/2023 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 12 rows in the source record cover these 5 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 90% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $160K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in CA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 056090. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-11-25, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.