No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Bethel Lutheran Home

2280 Dockery Avenue, Selma, CA 93662 · Non profit - Corporation · 59 certified beds · (559) 896-4900 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (559) 896-4900 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Resident-funds citation (F0567)Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

In its favor
  • a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0567)
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (41) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

3/5
CMS overall
3 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 3 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 2 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
Urgent care / clinic
2256 Dockery Ave · (559) 891-0100 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
Fox Drugs0.7 mi
1939 High St · (559) 896-1645 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
1445 Nebraska Ave · (559) 891-5000 · Call to confirm hours
Park
(912) 414-2421 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
2441 Dockery Ave · (559) 896-1052

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 2 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 1 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating3★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased13.8%10.2%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight4.4%4.0%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.8%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection1.1%1.2%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms0.6%7.3%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.4%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury5.7%1.6%3.3%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened17.3%9.8%16.1%typical
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication13.5%13.7%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%98.2%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers1.3%4.3%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control22.4%10.2%21.2%typical
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table4.6%12.0%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication2.4%1.5%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine96.3%93.2%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission35.0%23.0%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit25.6%11.2%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.662.251.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days4.011.571.80worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

42.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 37 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

42.7%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.4%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
58.3%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.31U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.18hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.12hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.01hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 58.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 24 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.31 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 50% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 11% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF42.7%CMS range 30.1–58.251.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.4%CMS range 6.8–15.210.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge58.3%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge62.5%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge54.2%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay2.9%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened2.9%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization8.6%CMS range 4.8–15.67.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.021.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.24
RN hours/ resident / day
0.97
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.59
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.81
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.23
RN hoursweekends
52.5%
Total nursing turnover
80.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 59 beds and averages 56.8 residents a day — about 96% occupied, or roughly 2 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.81 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.24 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.59 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.51 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.93 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.25 to 0.23 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 52% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

10
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-12-05)
12
at the previous standard inspection (2024-10-28)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

41 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 31 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-12-05 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain an effective infection prevention and control program for 49 of 49 sampled residents when: 1. Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 4 went into Resident 1's room, who was on contact precautions (requiring staff and visitors to wear gloves and gowns when entering the room, wash hands thoroughly, and use special equipment to prevent touching the patient or their stuff to stop germs from spreading from a sick person to others), and performed patient care without wearing personal protective equipment (PPE) such as a gown and gloves. This failure placed all residents LVN 4 came in contact with at risk for cross contamination (when harmful bacteria move from one item to another), of bacteria that could result in resident infections and illness. 2. The dietary cook (DC) 1 was observed cooking with his side beard exposed and did not have a hair net covering that area. This failure had the potential to put residents at risk of cross…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-12-05 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure pharmaceutical services kept accurate records for 23 out of 23 residents when 37 controlled substance medication (medication with a high potential for physical and mental dependence) entries, from 6/26/25-11/18/25, did not have a Registered Nurse witness signature for destruction on 11/20/25 in the controlled drug disposition log. This failure resulted in inadequate record keeping of controlled substance medication which had the potential to lead to inaccurate controlled medication inventory, diversion (when healthcare providers obtain or use prescription medicines illegally) of controlled medications and delayed identification of controlled medication diversion. During a concurrent interview and record review on 12/4/25 at 3:25 p.m. with the Director of Nursing (DON) the facility's Controlled Drug Disposition Log (CDL), dated 6/26/25-11/18/25, was reviewed. The DON stated the CDL required all entries to be filled out on the form to be considered complete and accurate. The DON stated the DON and the Consultant…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-05 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to accurately label and store medications in one of two medication carts and one of two medication rooms when:1. Medication cart, referred to as, medication cart B, contained one prescription medication with no expiration date for one resident (Resident 30)2. Medication room, referred to as, medication room C, contained one expired prescription medication for one resident (Resident 6). This failure had the potential to decrease medication potency that could compromise the therapeutic effectiveness of stored medications.During a concurrent observation and interview on 12/2/25 at 2:29 p.m. with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 3, medication cart B was observed behind nursing station B. Resident 30's morphine sulfate (controlled substance medication used to treat pain) 15 milligram (mg-a unit of measurement) prescription medication was observed with no use by or expiration date on the pharmaceutical label. LVN 3 stated Resident 30 had not been administered morphine sulfate 15 mg since it had been ordered. LVN 3…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-05 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure 19 of 49 residents receiving meals from the kitchen were served the correct serving for lunch on 12/3/25 when 19 residents on regular texture and portion diets were served sea greens with an incorrect serving size of #10 scoop (3/8 cup) instead of a #8 scoop (1/2 cup) serving. This failure resulted in 19 residents receiving the wrong caloric intake which could result in inadequate nutrition, weight gain or weight loss, and lead to serious medical conditions. During a review of the facility's document titled, Diet Type Report, dated 12/4/25, the document indicated 49 residents received meals from the kitchen. The document indicated 19 of 49 residents received regular texture diets with regular portions from the kitchen. During a review of the facility's recipe document titled, Sea Greens #2, undated, the document indicated, .suggested portion: #8.serve with a #8 scoop. During a concurrent observation and interview on 12/3/25 at 11:52 a.m. with Dietary [NAME] (DC) 1, in the kitchen during lunch tray line,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-05 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food and beverages were stored, distributed, and served safely in accordance with professional standards of food service safety for 49 out of 49 residents eating at the facility when: 1. Three packages of bread were expired in the dry good pantry.2. Two opened cereal containers were not labeled with received, opened and expiration dates in the dry good pantry.3. One opened crushed rosemary seasoning was expired in the kitchen preparation area.4. One lemon juice bottle was stored below meat and had a wet, yellow spotted sticky substance on the bottle in the serving preparation fridge.These failures had the potential to result in the serving of expired or contaminated food and beverage items which could result in foodborne illness (illness caused by food contaminated with bacteria, viruses, parasites, or toxins).1. 1. During a concurrent observation and interview on 12/2/25 at 10:17 a.m. with the Dietary Supervisor (DS), in the dry good pantry, three packages of bread were observed with an expiration…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-05 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for one of 15 residents (Resident 9), when Resident 9's care plan indicated she needed one on one (1:1- one dedicated caregiver gives their full, undivided attention to just that person) supervision and a bolster (a long pillow or cushion) mattress on her bed and neither of those interventions were being implemented. This failure of not implementing an individualized care plan for Resident 9 had the potential to place Resident 9's safety at risk and her specific needs not being met.During a review of Resident 9's admission Record (a summary of important information regarding a patient which include patient identification, past medical history, insurance status, care providers, family contact information and other pertinent information), dated [DATE], the admission Record indicated, Resident 9 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of unspecified disorder of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-05 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to meet professional standards of practice for one of thirteen sampled residents during medication administration (Resident 6) when Resident 6's Tylenol (pain medication used to treat mild pain) medication lacked an appropriate indication and an associated pain rating scale to guide administration.This failure resulted in Resident 6's Tylenol medication order not having complete and appropriate administration instructions which resulted in the administration of Tylenol with no prior pain assessment which could lead to uncontrolled or mismanaged pain management. During a review of Resident 6's admission Record (AR - a summary of information regarding a patient which includes patient identification, past medical history, insurance status, care providers, family contact information and other pertinent information), dated 12/4/25, the AR indicated Resident 6 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of diverticulitis (an acute or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-05 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that medical records were complete for one of seven sampled residents (Resident 64) when Resident 64's Inventory of Personal Effects form (An Inventory sheet of resident's personal belongings completed upon admission to the facility) was incompletely filled out. This failure had the potential to result in Resident 64's poor continuity of care due to miscommunication among caregivers, inconsistent care delivery or loss or theft of personal belongings.During an interview on 12/4/25 at 11:29 a.m. with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 1, CNA 1 stated an Inventory of Personal Effects form is filled out on admission by the CNA, signed by the CNA, and the form given to the nurse. CNA 1 stated the Inventory form should be filled out accurately and completely so that everyone knows what resident belongings were brought into the facility, resident items don't go missing, and to keep track of the resident's items. CNA 1 stated if the residents belongings were to go missing, it was important to have an accurately filled out…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-05 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — isolated
    Ensure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to have record of abuse in-service training for the year 2025 for one of three certified nursing assistants (CNA 4) reviewed. This failure had the potential to put all 49 residents at risk of experiencing abuse by staff. During a concurrent interview and record review on 12/4/25 at 10 a.m., with the Director of Staff Development/Infection Preventionist (DSD/IP) and Director of Nursing (DON), the abuse in-service training sign-in sheet (AIS) for employed certified nursing assistants (CNA) for 2025 was reviewed. The AIS indicated CNA 4 was not accounted for in having completed her abuse in-service for 2025. The DON stated CNA 4 was a full-time employee. During an interview on 12/5/25 at 2:51 p.m., with the DSD/IP she stated she was responsible for the abuse trainings but was not the DSD at the time of these trainings. The DSD/IP stated the expectation was that all CNA's received the required training, but CNA 4 was missing. The DSD/IP stated abuse training was important to educate staff on how to report and recognize abuse with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-22 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide care in a manner that maintained dignity and respect for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1), when Resident 1 was awoken at 2:00 a.m. and subjected to two attempted straight catheterizations (invasive thin flexible tube used to drain urine from the bladder) without a physician order or consent. This failure violated the resident's rights to receive care in a dignified and respectful manner.During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (AR) dated 8/22/25, the AR indicated, Resident 1 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of hemiplegia (the loss of the ability to move one side of the body), Metabolic encephalopathy (brain dysfunction, which disrupts normal brain function) and malignant neoplasm of brain ( a cancerous growth in the brain or central nervous system).During a review of Resident 1's Order Summary Report (OSR) dated 8/8/25, at 1307 the OSR indicated, .May have UA (urinalysis medical…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 31 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-22 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure physician orders were followed for 1 of 3 sampled residents (Resident 1). When the Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 1 obtained a urine specimen by straight catheterization (invasive thin flexible tube used to drain urine from the bladder) without a physician order for catheter.This failure had the potential to place the resident at risk for unnecessary pain, infection, and psychosocial harm.During a review of Resident 1's Order Summary Report (OSR) dated 8/8/25, at 1307 the OSR indicated, .May have UA (urinalysis medical test that examines urine to help diagnose medical conditions). One time only for foul order for 3 days.During a review of Resident 1's OSR dated 8/10/25 at 0305 the OSR indicated .May have UA with C&S (culture and sensitivity a more detailed test of the urinalysis indicates a possible infection) if indicated one time only for foul odor for 3 days.During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (AR) dated 8/22/25,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-15 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the rights of two of three sampled residents (Resident 1 and Resident 2) right to a dignified private and personal space was respected when one facility male employee laid down on the bed with Resident 1 and had taken a nap with her for several minutes; and when Resident 1's roommate, Resident 2, observed this. This failure resulted in the potential for psychosocial harm such as emotional distress for Resident 1 and Resident 2. Findings: During a review of the facility document titled SOC 341/5 Day Report (Report) , dated 11/18/24, the Report indicated, On 11/13/24, [at approximately 4 p.m.] Administrator was notified by [Resident 2] that a male CNA [Certified Nursing Assistant 1] had taken a nap in [Resident 1's] bed with her. An investigation was started immediately by the management team. Resident [1] was interviewed by [Licensed Nurse] and [Social Services Director]. Watched video footage of B-Wing Hall [hall where Resident 1 and 2 resided]. Staff member from B-wing hall interviewed. Confirmed incident was found…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-15 · tag F0940 — failed to train staff — isolated
    Develop, implement, and/or maintain an effective training program for all new and existing staff members.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure two of three employees' (CNA 1 and CNA 3) orientation to the facility and education documentation was thorough and completed by the Director of Staff Development (DSD). This failure had the potential for staff education requirements to not be verified by the DSD, enabling poorly trained staff to work in the facility with residents. Findings: During a review of the facility document titled, Job Description – Director of Staff Development (DSD) , dated 1/24, the Job Description indicated, The Director of Staff Development (DSD) plays a key role in creating a positive learning culture within [the facility], overseeing training and continuing education to support the growth and professional development of nursing and support staff. This role ensures that all personnel maintain the required licensure and certifications, comply with facility policies and are well-equipped with the knowledge and skills necessary for providing high-quality resident care. The DSD coordinates with all mandatory training programs, evaluates…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-15 · tag F0942 — isolated
    Ensure that staff members are educated on resident rights and facility responsibilities to properly care for its residents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of three employees ' (Certified Nursing Assistant, or CNA 1) education on Resident ' s Rights was thorough and completed by the Director of Staff Development (DSD). This failure resulted in staff education on Resident Rights to not be completed and verified by the DSD for CNA 1, enabling CNA 1 to be untrained on Resident Rights while working with residents, including Resident 1 [cross-reference with F550]. Findings: During a review of the facility document titled, Job Description – Director of Staff Development (DSD), dated 1/24, the Job Description indicated, The Director of Staff Development (DSD) plays a key role in creating a positive learning culture within [the facility], overseeing training and continuing education to support the growth and professional development of nursing and support staff. This role ensures that all personnel maintain the required licensure and certifications, comply with facility policies and are well-equipped with the knowledge and skills necessary for providing high-quality…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-10-28 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, and serve food in accordance with professional standards of practice for food service safety when: 1. A walk- in freezer had beef stew meat with ice crystals inside the bag labeled 7/14/24. 2. A foam cup containing food with staff name undated labeled was stored on shelf in walk-in refrigerator. 3. An open yogurt container with no opened date was found in the walk-in refrigerator 4. A white bin containing oats was not labeled with open and received date in the storage room. 5. Cookies, snacks and 2-liter sodas brought from family members, were found with no label of date opened, date received, or initials, in two of six sampled residents' (Resident 2 and 24) room. These failures had the potential to transmit food-borne illnesses to residents. 1. During a concurrent observation and interview on 10/22/24 at 8:23 a.m. in the walk- in freezer with the Dietary Service Supervisor (DSS) a bag containing stew meat dated 7/14/24 had…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-10-28 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — pattern
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY During observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure privacy and confidentiality for two out of four residents (Resident 10 and Resident 15) during medication administration and medical treatment when: 1. Resident 10's curtains were not pulled during blood glucose testing (a measurement of the amount of sugar in a person's blood. It involves a finger prick or blood draw from the vein) and administration of insulin (a medication that lowers the amount of sugar in the blood). 2. Resident 15's curtains were not pulled during the administration of eye drops. These failures had the potential to place Resident 10 and Resident 15 at risk of losing their privacy and confidentiality during their medical treatments, and not attaining, or maintaining physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. Findings: 1. During a concurrent observation and interview on 10/23/24 at 11:16 a.m. with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 2, in Resident 10's room, Resident 10 was observed dressed, sitting in his…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-28 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — pattern
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation interview and record review the facility failed to provide services that met professional standards of quality of care for one of six sampled residents (Resident 3) when Resident 3's Hoyer lift sling (a mobile device which helps caregivers safely transfer patients) was used incorrectly during a transfer from his wheelchair to the bed. This failure caused Resident 3 to experience pain and discomfort and had the potential to result in injury as a result of using the lift improperly. Findings: During a review of Resident 3's admission Record (AR- a document which provides resident contact details, a brief medical history, level of functioning, preferences, and wishes), dated 10/25/2024, the AR indicated Resident 3 was admitted with the following conditions: contracture of muscles (stiffness or tightening of the muscles which causes inability to move), generalized weakness (overall lack of strength), and generalized abdominal pain (pain in the stomach area). During an observation on 10/23/24 at 11:46 a.m. in Resident 3's room, Certified Nursing Assistants (CNA) 1…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-28 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY During observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure accurate labeling of resident medications, and storage of resident medications at proper temperatures to preserve their integrity in accordance with accepted professional standards of practice when: 1. One of two medication carts had two out of 199 pill packets with no visible expiration dates. 2. Seven out of seven boxed medications did not have the inside medication container labeled with resident information. 3. One of two medication refrigerators was below the facility required temperature range of 36 degrees Fahrenheit (F) and 46 degrees F. These failures put residents at risk for unsafe administration of medications. Findings: 1. During a concurrent observation and interview on 10/24/24 at 12:00 p.m. with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 2, in the B-wing nurse's station, the B-wing medication cart was observed to have two of 199 resident pill cards (a packet containing a set number of prefilled prescription medications) without…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-10-28 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure 56 of 56 sampled residents received safe and appetizing temperature food when Dietary [NAME] (DC) did not check temperature of food on steam table on 10/23/24 before serving. This failure had the potential for all 56 residents to be served cold food and for all 56 residents to contract food borne illnesses. Findings: During an observation on 10/23/24 at 10:19 a.m. in the kitchen with the DC, the DC removed tray #1 lasagna from oven and placed the lasagna on steam table. During an observation on 10/23/24 at 11:33 a.m. the DC removed tray #2 lasagna from oven and placed the lasagna on steam table. During an observation on 10/23/24 at 11:39 a.m. in the kitchen during tray line (food service assembly line system where workers add components to a tray as it moves along a line),the following items were observed on the steam table: tray #1 lasagna stacked on top of tray #2 lasagna, a silver tray of boiled vegetables, six foam containers (three pureed lasagna and three pureed vegetables) were on the steam…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-10-28 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — pattern
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to monitor and maintain essential equipment in a safe operating condition for one of two medication room refrigerators, when the refrigerator temperature reading was below the acceptable range for safe holding of medication. This failure had the potential to put residents whose medications were held in the B-wing medication refrigerator at risk of receiving unsafe and ineffective medications. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 10/24/24 at 11:18 a.m. with the Minimum Data Set Nurse (MDSN) in the B-wing medication room, the medication refrigerator temperature was observed at 32 degrees Fahrenheit ( F). The MDSN stated the refrigerator temperature of 32 degrees F was too cold to hold medications. The MDSN stated having the refrigerator temperature below the accepted temperature range of 36 degrees F could damage the medications and make them unsafe for resident use. During a concurrent interview and record review on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-28 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement a care plan in regard to pain for one of one residents (Resident 3), when staff did not pre-medicate Resident 3 with an analgesic (a medication that reduces pain) prior to physical therapy. This failure to not follow the care plan, resulted in Resident 3 to have unmanaged pain. Findings: During a review of Resident 3's Face Sheet (a summary of important information regarding a patient which include patient identification, past medical history, insurance status, care providers, family contact information and other pertinent information), the face sheet indicated, Resident 3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis which included Generalized Abdominal Pain (pain that affects more than half of the abdomen), Poly-osteoarthritis (arthritis that affects five or more joints at the same time), Muscle Weakness (loss of muscle strength) and Contracture of Muscles (bilateral [both sides of body] lower legs- a permanent tightening of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-28 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the right to be free from pain for one of one residents (Resident 3), when Resident 3 was not given analgesia (pain medication), per his care plan, before physical therapy. This failure resulted in Resident 3 experiencing pain during a transfer from his wheelchair to his bed and during physical therapy. Findings: During a review of Resident 3's Face Sheet (a summary of important information regarding a patient which includes patient identification, past medical history, insurance status, care providers, family contact information and other pertinent information), the face sheet indicated, Resident 3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis which included Generalized Abdominal Pain (pain that affects more than half of the abdomen), Poly-osteoarthritis (arthritis that affects five or more joints at the same time), Muscle Weakness (loss of muscle strength) and Contracture of Muscles (bilateral [both sides of body] lower…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-28 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolated
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interview, and record review the, the facility failed to ensure the physician order (set of instructions written by a doctor) was followed for one of the six sampled residents (Resident 14) was served an incorrect scoop size for small portion diet on 10/23/24. This failure had the potential for Resident 14 to received more than the recommended number of calories ordered by the physician. Findings: During an observation on 10/23/24 at 11:39 a.m. in the kitchen during tray line (food service assembly line system where workers add components to a tray as it moves along a line) Dietary [NAME] (DC) used number 8 scoop size on the steam table. DM stated he should have given less for residents with order for smaller portions. During an interview on 10/24/24 at 9:33 a.m. with the Dietary Services Supervisor, the DSS stated, there should be a number 8 scoop size regular portion) and number 10 scoop size (small portion) during tray line. The DSS stated, Resident 14 had an order for small size…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-28 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation interview and record review the facility failed to ensure meal preferences were followed for one of seven residents (Resident 51) when Resident 51 was served items on her list of disliked foods of chicken with skin and beets. This failure had the potential to cause Resident 51 to experience inadequate nutrition and weight loss as a result of not eating. Findings: During a review of Resident 51's admission Record (AR- a document which provides resident contact details, a brief medical history, level of functioning, preferences, and wishes), dated 10/24/2024, the AR indicated Resident 51 was admitted with the following conditions: diverticulitis(swelling or infection of small pouches in the intestines), protein calorie malnutrition (occurs when a person does not eat enough protein and calories in their food to meet their nutritional needs), and diarrhea (frequent loose-bowel movement) During a review of Resident 51's Minimum Data Set (MDS- resident assessment tool which indicates physical and cognitive abilities), dated 8/5/2024, the MDS indicated a Brief…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-28 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure medical records were complete and accurately documented in accordance with accepted professional standards of practice for one of six sampled residents (Resident 8), when Resident 8's antipsychotic consent forms were incomplete. This failure put Resident 8 at risk of receiving antipsychotic medication prior to being informed of the risks and benefits of taking the medication. Findings: During a review of Resident 8's admission Record (AR - a summary of information regarding a patient which includes patient identification, past medical history, insurance status, care providers, family contact information and other pertinent information), dated 10/28/24, the AR indicated Resident 8 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of cerebral infarction (damage to tissues in the brain due to a loss of oxygen to the area), anxiety disorder (a mental health disorder characterized by feelings of worry, anxiety, or fear that are strong enough to interfere with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-28 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe and sanitary environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of infections for 56 of 56 sampled residents when Contractor Technician (CT) did not wash his hands upon entering kitchen. This failure had the potential to cause cross contamination (physical movement or transfer of harmful bacteria from one person, object, or place to another) and foodborne illnesses to 56 residents, staffs and visitors that received ice from the ice-machine. Finding: During a concurrent observation and interview on 10/25/24 at 8:55 a.m. in the kitchen, a contractor technician (CT) walked to ice-machine and started scooping ice from bin without washing his hands. The CT stated, he did not wash his hands prior to scooping ice. The CT stated he should have washed his hands when entering kitchen. The CT stated hand washing was important to prevent the spread of cross-contamination (the physical movement or transfer of harmful bacteria…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-12-01 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — pattern
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the facility medication error rate did not exceed five percent (eight percent) when: 1. Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 5, administered Resident 5's (brand name) calcium tablet (used to prevent or treat low blood calcium levels in people who do not get enough calcium from their diets.) with vitamin D (nutrient the body needs for building and maintaining healthy bones) for an order of (brand name) Calcium 500 mg. This failure had the potential for Resident 5's Vitamin D level to go higher and lead to serious medical condition. 2. LVN 2 administered Resident 30's Multivitamin (used to treat or prevent vitamin deficiency due to poor diet, certain illnesses or during pregnancy) gummies (chewy gelatin-based) for an order of multivitamins-minerals. This failure had the potential for Resident 30's daily mineral needs to be not met. Findings: 1. During a concurrent observation and interview on 11/28/23 at 7:35 a.m., in B-wing, LVN 5 was passing medication. LVN 5 prepared Resident 5's medications. LVN 5…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-01 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY During a review of Resident 26's admission Record (AR), (undated), the AR indicated, . Resident 26 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] . During a review of Resident 26's paper chart the Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (POLST), dated [DATE], the POLST indicated, Resident 26 did not have an advanced directive. Resident 26's Health Care Power of Attorney Appointment of Health Care Agent and Proxy document dated [DATE] was located in Resident 26's paper chart. During a review of Resident 26's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a resident assessment tool used to identify resident cognitive and physical function) Assessment, dated [DATE], the MDS indicated Resident 26's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS - an evaluation of attention, orientation and memory recall) score of 99 (0-7 severe cognitive impairment, 8-12 moderate cognitive impairment, 13-15 no cognitive impairment, score of 99 resident unable to complete the interview), Resident 26 was unable to complete the interview. During a concurrent…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-01 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident was treated with dignity and respect for one of four sampled residents (Resident 5) when Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 5 administered medication to Resident 5 in the hallway. This failure resulted in Resident 5 not being provided with respect and dignity while taking her medications. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 11/28/23 at 7:35 a.m., in B wing hallway, Resident 5 was sitting up in her wheelchair appropriately dressed for the weather. LVN 5 prepared Resident 5's medications. LVN 5 administered Resident 5's medications in the hallway with other residents and staff walking by. During a review of Resident 5's clinical record titled, admission Record, (document containing resident personal information) dated, 11/29/23, indicated Resident 5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included: . dementia (impaired ability to remember, think, or make decisions that interferes with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-01 · tag F0567 — failed to protect residents' money held by the home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to manage his or her financial affairs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide access to personal funds for one of two sampled residents (Resident 10) when he was unable to request his personal funds on the weekends. This failure resulted in Resident 10 not being able to access his funds on the weekends for his personal needs. Findings: During a review of Resident 10's admission Record (AR) (undated), the AR indicated, . Resident 10 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] . During an interview on 11/29/23 at 10:57 a.m. with Resident 10, Resident 10 stated the facility held his funds. Resident 10 stated he was able to access funds on the weekdays but was not able to access funds on the weekends or holidays. Resident 10 stated . They do not have anyone [Business office staff] here on weekend . Resident 10 stated accessing funds on the weekends was . something you just don't do . Resident 10 stated he would request his funds from the business office staff and would use the funds to buy gum, cookies, and coffee. During a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-01 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to provide residents with accessibility to file a grievance, anonymous grievance or complaint and did not update the grievance policy to ensure the prompt resolution of grievances for seven of ten sampled residents (Resident 25, Resident 10, Resident 17, Resident 18, Resident 19 and Resident 48, Resident 37) when: 1. Resident 37 filed a grievance in September 2023 requesting a room change and the grievance was not documented and followed up on by the facility staff. 2. Resident 25, Resident 10, Resident 17, Resident 18, Resident 19 and Resident 48 did not know how to file a grievance anonymously. 3. The facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled Grievances did not include the right to file a grievance in writing or orally, the right to file a grievance anonymously, the right to obtain the review in writing, the required contact information of the grievance official, the contact information of independent entities with whom grievances…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-01 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set (MDS-a resident assessment tool used to identify resident care needs) assessment accurately reflected the residents' current status for one of six sampled residents (Resident 19) when Resident 19's MDS assessment of Health Conditions (Section J) was not coded accurately. This failure placed Resident 19's at a potential of her smoking needs to be not met. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 11/28/23 at 9:33 a.m., in Resident 19's room. Resident 19 stated she was a smoker and the facility provided her with a smoking schedule. Resident 19 pointed to a sheet with the smoking times listed, pinned to the bulletin board in her room. During an interview on 11/28/23 at 10:33 a.m., with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 9, CNA 9 stated Resident 19 was a smoker. During a review of Resident 19's MDS assessment Section C Cognitive Patterns, dated 11/1/23, the MDS assessment, Section C Cognitive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-01 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a comprehensive, person-centered care plan (A plan that provides direction for individualized care of the resident) was developed and implemented to meet the needs for two of five sampled residents (Resident 47, Resident 7) when: 1. Resident 47 did not have a care plan for activities. This failure had the potential to result in Resident 47's activities to go unmet and could result to self isolation. 2. Resident 7 did not have a care plan for milk allergy. This failure had the potential for Resident 7 to receive milk products which could result in breathing difficulty or other health complications. Findings: 1. During a concurrent observation and interview on 11/27/23 at 11:29 a.m., with Resident 47, in Resident 47's room, Resident 47 was observed laying in bed with eye patch covering her eyes. Resident 47 stated this was her second time in the facility. Resident 47 stated she did not feel like getting out of bed. Resident 47 stated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-01 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to meet professional standards of practice for one of six sampled residents (Resident 46) when Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 4 left Resident 46's morning medication at bedside accessible to others. This failure placed Resident 46 at risk for not taking the medications, medication error, other residents or unauthorized personnel to access Resident 46's medications. Findings: During a review of Resident 46's admission Record (AR-a document containing resident medical and personal information), undated, the AR indicated, Resident 46 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included, atrial fibrillation (afib- abnormal heartbeat which can lead to blood clots in the heart), anemia (lower than normal healthy red blood cells), muscle weakness, protein-calorie malnutrition (lack of sufficient nutrients in the body) and adult failure to thrive (a decline of health and ability in older adults). During a review of Residents 46's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-01 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from unnecessary psychotropic medications (medications which affect the mind, emotions, and behavior) for one of four residents (Resident 34) when Resident 34 was given divalproex (an anticonvulsant medication used to treat seizures [a burst of uncontrolled electrical activity between brain cells that causes temporary abnormalities in muscle tone or movements, behaviors, sensations or states of awareness]) without consistent indication for use, documented non-pharmacological interventions, and clinical justification to support the use of divalproex. This failure resulted in Resident 34 receiving unnecessary psychotropic medications and placed the Resident 34 at an increased risk for developing adverse (harmful) side effects due to taking divalproex. Findings: During a review of Resident 34's admission Record (AR), dated 11/29/23, the AR indicated, Resident 34 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-01 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications used were labeled and stored in accordance with professional standards when: 1. Resident 5's (linaclotide brand name - medication used to treat constipation) medication label did not match the medication order. This failure had the potential for the medication not to be administered according to the physician's order and resident's need. 2. A medication cart in B-wing unit was left unlocked and unattended by Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 5. This failure placed all residents' health and safety at risk when drugs were left unattended and accessible to unauthorized individuals. 3. A bottle of over the counter (OTC) medication was left on top of the medication cart, unattended by LVN 5. This failure placed all residents' health and safety at risk when drugs were left unattended and accessible to unauthorized individuals. Findings: 1. During a review of Resident 5's Order Summary Report, dated 11/29/23, the Order Summary Report, indicated, . [linaclotide brand name] capsule 290 MCG…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-01 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — isolated
    Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure garbage was properly contained in dumpsters (garbage containers) covered with lids for one of five dumpsters when one garbage dumpsters outside of the facility was left uncovered, with lids to the side. This failure had the potential to attract rodents, insects and flies and spread infection placing residents at risk of foodborne illness. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 11/27/23 at 9:50 a.m., with the Dietary Supervisor (DS), outside the trash collection area, there were five large dumpsters. One large trash dumpster was open with both lids flopped on the side. The DS stated, the lids (dumpster) were normally covered (closed), not sure why one dumpster was left open. The DS stated having the lids which were not closed could attract animals and potentially cause cross-contamination and the spread of bacteria causing disease. During a concurrent observation and interview on 11/28/23 at 10:45 a.m., with the Maintenance Supervisor (MS), at back of facility, there were five large…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-01 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe and sanitary environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of infections when: 1. One of three sampled resident's (Resident 4) foley catheter (indwelling urinary catheter - a thin tube placed in the bladder to drain urine into a bag) tubing was lying the floor on two separate occasions. This failure placed Resident 4 at risk for catheter contamination and a urinary tract infection (UTI- an infection in any part of the urinary system [kidneys, ureters, bladder]). 2. Two of two non-kitchen staff (staff position unknown and Maintenance Director [MS])entered the kitchen area without wearing proper hair covering and washing their hands. This failure had the potential to cause cross contamination (physical movement or transfer of harmful bacteria from one person, object, or place to another) and spread of infection. Findings: During a concurrent…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Bcited before2025-12-05 · tag F0912 — pattern
    Provide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and staff interview during the survey period from 12/2/25 through 12/5/25, the facility failed to ensure each bedroom had 80 square feet of usable living space for residents in 22 of 29 rooms (Rooms 27, 28, 29, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 47, 48, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59 and 60). This failure to provide the residents in rooms 27, 28, 29, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 47, 48, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59 and 60 with 80 square feet (sq ft- unit of measurement) of space had the potential for the residents to not have enough space to accommodate their personal needs and belongings. During an interview on 12/2/25 at 10 a.m., with the Administrator (ADM), the ADM stated he was aware rooms 27, 28, 29, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 47, 48, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59 and 60 did not meet the minimum space requirement for two residents. The ADM provided the room measurements for rooms 27, 28, 29, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 47, 48, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59 and 60. The room…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Ccited before2024-10-28 · tag F0912 — widespread
    Provide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, during the survey period of 10/22/24 to 10/28/24, the facility failed to provide the minimum of at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple resident rooms (Rooms 27, 28, 29, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 47, 48, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59 and 60). This failure had the potential for residents to not have reasonable accommodations for privacy or adequate space for care to be rendered. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 10/28/24 at 8:58 a.m. with the Maintenance Supervisor (MS), an environmental tour was conducted. The MS measured 22 resident rooms as follows: Room Number Square Feet Number of Residents 27 154 2 28 154 2 29 154 2 31 154 2 32 154 2 33 154 2 34 154 2 35 154 2 36 154 2 47 154 2 48 154 2 50 154 2 51 154 2 52 154 2 53 154 2 54 154 2 55 154 2 56 154 2 57 154 2 58 154 2 59 154 2 60 154 2 During an interview on 10/25/24 at 10:30 a.m. With Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 7, CNA 7 stated she had worked at the facility…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Waiver has been granted
  • No harm found · Ccited before2023-12-01 · tag F0912 — widespread
    Provide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, during the survey period of 11/27/2023 to 12/1/23, the facility failed to provide the minimum of at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple resident rooms (Rooms 27, 28, 29, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 47, 48, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59 and 60). This failure had the potential for residents to not have reasonable accommodations for privacy or adequate space for care to be rendered. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 11/30/23 at 9:38 a.m. with the Maintenance Supervisor (MS), an environmental tour was conducted. The MS measured 22 resident rooms as follows: Room Number Square Feet Number of Residents 27 154 2 28 154 2 29 154 2 31 154 2 32 154 2 33 154 2 34 154 2 35 154 2 36 154 2 47 154 2 48 154 2 50 154 2 51 154 2 52 154 2 53 154 2 54 154 2 55 154 2 56 154 2 57 154 2 58 154 2 59 154 2 60 154 2 During an interview on 12/1/23 at 2:55 p.m. with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 1, CNA 1 stated she had worked at the facility for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Waiver has been granted

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
HERTZOG, BONNYIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2016
JACOBSEN, LAURELIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2015
SAFRENO, DANIELIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 07/19/2016
SCHAULAND, DONNAIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 10/01/2016
STECK, EDWARDIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2017
WADEWITZ, BETTYIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 06/20/2017
BENNER, PHILIPIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 01/01/2015
PATTESON, SHIKHAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 01/21/2021

The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$7.0M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-23.6%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 19%Medicare 5%Other / private 77%

A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$361per resident / day
operating cost
$10,984per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$292per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in California
$12,167/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$15,178/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,000/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 555924. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-12-05, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next