Atterdag Care Center
636 Atterdag Road, Solvang, CA 93463 · Non profit - Other · 50 certified beds · (805) 688-5645 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home’s record is mixed — some reassuring signs, some worth asking about.
- a strong health-inspection score (4/5) — the hardest rating to game (though it’s ranked within its own state, not nationally)
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- lower-than-typical staff turnover (20% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (32) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 4 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 1 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 2 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 5 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 5 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 24.8% | 10.2% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 0.0% | 4.0% | 5.4% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 3.6% | 0.8% | 0.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 6.5% | 1.2% | 2.0% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 2.7% | 7.3% | 6.5% | better |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.4% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 0.6% | 1.6% | 3.3% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 31.6% | 9.8% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 13.7% | 13.7% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 97.6% | 98.2% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 3.3% | 4.3% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 26.5% | 10.2% | 21.2% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 28.2% | 12.0% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.0% | 1.5% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 89.5% | 93.2% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 15.4% | 23.0% | 22.6% | better |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 11.8% | 11.2% | 12.0% | typical |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.00 | 2.25 | 1.67 | better |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 2.30 | 1.57 | 1.80 | worse |
* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
63.3% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 122 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 72.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 83 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.20 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 23% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 64% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy at close to weekday levels right through the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 63.3%CMS range 54.4–69.5 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | better than U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 9.4%CMS range 6.2–13.6 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 72.3% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 42.2% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 74.7% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 5.6%CMS range 2.9–10.3 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.89 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 50 beds and averages 48.0 residents a day — about 96% occupied, or roughly 2 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.85 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.44 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.48 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.29 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.08 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.53 to 0.24 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 20% is below the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
32 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 22 are one tap away and print in full.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-10 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to revise a care plan for one of two sampled residents (Resident 1) after Resident had multiple falls on 2/17/26,3/4/26, and 3/10/26, This facility failure placed Resident 1 at higher risk for falls with injuries.During a review of the admission Record (AR) for Resident 1, admission date 8/26/24, The AR indicated Resident 1 was a [AGE] year old male with diagnosis including Senile Degeneration of the Brain (Progressive loss of cognitive function characterized by memory loss, confusion, behavioral changes, and impaired daily functions) and Alzheimer's Disease (Progressive, incurable disease causing brain shrinkage and neuron death characterized by memory loss, cognitive decline, and behavioral changes), Adjustment disorder with mixed anxiety and depressed mood, Abnormalities of gait and mobility.During a review of Resident 1's Post Fall Evaluation (PFE), dated 2/17/26, the PFE indicated Resident 1 experienced an unwitnessed fall on 2/17/26 at 3:45 P.M. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-10 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and policy and procedure, the facility failed to ensure the medical record contained documentation for a reason as needed (PRN) medication was given for one of two sampled residents (Resident 1).This failure had the potential to result in an incomplete medical record for a resident medication administration requirement. During a review of the admission Record (AR) for Resident 1, admission date 8/26/24, The AR indicated Resident 1 was a [AGE] year old male with diagnosis including Senile Degeneration of the Brain (Progressive loss of cognitive function characterized by memory loss, confusion, behavioral changes, and impaired daily functions) and Alzheimer's Disease (Progressive, incurable disease causing brain shrinkage and neuron death characterized by memory loss, cognitive decline, and behavioral changes), Adjustment disorder with mixed anxiety and depressed mood.During a review of the Administration Record (MAR), dated 3/1/26-3/31/26, The Mar indicated a physician order of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-09 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolatedPrevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to meet federal regulatory requirements when the clinical record for one of three sampled residents (Resident 8) had no documented justification for extending a PRN (as needed) psychotropic medication (any drug that affects brain activities associated with mental processes and behavior) order beyond 14 days.This failure had the potential to result in Resident 8 receiving an unnecessary psychotropic medication which could affect the resident's health and safety.Findings:During a review of Resident 8's admission Record (AR), dated 1/8/26, the AR indicated, Resident 8 was a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with admission diagnoses including, Alzheimer's disease (a progressive brain disorder that primarily affects memory, thinking, and behavior), dementia with mood disturbance (a pattern of mental decline caused by different diseases or conditions), major depressive disorder (a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-09 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure care plan interventions were properly implemented and documented in the clinical record for two of three sampled residents (Residents 8 and 2) when:1. Monitoring for wander guard device (a monitoring device used to ensure safety for residents at risk for elopement/wandering) placement and function was not implemented and documented in Resident 8's clinical record.2. Monitoring for pacemaker (a small, battery-powered device that prevents the heart from beating too slowly) status and function was not implemented and documented in Resident 2's clinical record.These monitoring oversight failures inaccurately reflect these residents' current health statuses which could potentially compromise their health and safety.Findings:1. During a review of Resident 8's admission Record (AR), dated 1/8/26, the AR indicated, Resident 8 was a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with admission diagnoses including, Alzheimer's disease (a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-09 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to revise one out of five sampled residents (Resident 36) care plan following minimum data set (MDS - a standardized, comprehensive assessment tool used to collect essential resident data) assessments. This failure resulted in inaccurate care planning for Resident 36's healthcare needs.During review of Resident 36's admission Record (AR), dated 1/8/26, the AR indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included, chronic pain, pressure ulcer (PU - injury to skin and tissue resulting from prolonged pressure) of left heel stage 2 (a shallow open ulcer, with partial-thickness skin loss, and a red/pink base or intact/ruptured blister), encounter for palliative care (care focused on end of life comfort, relieving symptoms, stress, and improving the quality of life), and sepsis (an overactive response to an infection that damages its own tissues, organs, and systems, leading to potential organ failure and death if not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-09 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the provision of resident care and services were performed within acceptable professional nursing standards for three of six sampled residents (Residents 8, 45 and 36) when:1. Resident 8 missed their medication on several occasions, and there was no subsequent follow-up by the nursing staff.2. Resident 45's oxygen (O2) saturations (02 sats- measure of 02 in the blood) were not consistently documented in the clinical record.3. Resident 36 was treated with Calmoseptine Ointment (a multi-purpose moisture barrier used to soothe and protect irritated skin from moisture, itching, and discomfort) for a wound without a physician's order.These failures had the potential to result in unsafe nursing care practices which could compromise the health and safety of these residents.Findings:1. During a review of Resident 8's admission Record (AR), dated 1/8/26, the AR indicate, Resident 8 was a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-09 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, observation and record review, the facility failed to obtain monthly weights for one of four sampled residents (Resident 4).This failure had the potential for undetected weight fluctuations that could signal underlying health problems.Findings:During a concurrent interview and record review on 1/8/26 at 3:30 p.m. with Director of Nursing (DON), Resident 4's Current vital signs (CVS), dated 1/8/26 were reviewed. The CVS indicated, the last monthly weight for Resident 4 was obtained on 8/27/24. DON verbalized monthly weights should be obtained for every resident, a notation in the chart should indicate why a monthly weight was not obtained. DON confirmed there were no nursing notes or dietary notes present in Resident 4's medical record that provided an explanation for why the monthly weights were not done.During an interview on 1/8/26 at 3:45 p.m. with Resident 4, Resident 4 verbalized, the facility can weigh her, she has not refused, and has no problem with being weighed in a sling.During a review of the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Maintaining…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-09 · tag F0710 — isolatedObtain a doctor's order to admit a resident and ensure the resident is under a doctor's care.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a physician provided timely consultation or treatment when contacted by the facility to address a change in condition for two of five sampled residents' (Residents 23 and 28). This deficient practice resulted in a delay in care and treatment to meet Residents 23's and 28's immediate care needs and had the potential to result in an avoidable deterioration in health. During review of the facility's policy and procedures (P&P) titled, Change of Condition, dated 9/30/24, the P&P indicated in part, Purpose: To ensure that appropriate care and documentation occurs when residents experience a change of condition. Procedure: 2. Notify the attending physician promptly.5. Follow up nursing assessments and monitoring until the condition has stabilized .What is a Change of Condition? .Any sudden or marked change in:.Abnormal lab or X-ray reports.Open or red areas.Bruises, lacerations, blisters, rashes, or skin tears. a. During review of Resident 23's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-09 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure nursing staff signed the controlled drug record after administering medication.This failure had the potential to result in unauthorized tampering and diversion of resident medications.Findings: During a concurrent interview and record review on 1/7/26 at 9:50 a.m. with Licensed Nurse (LN)1, Resident 24's Controlled Drug Record (CDR), dated 1/6/26 was reviewed. The CDR indicated, on 1/6/26 at 8:55 p.m. Resident 24 was administered Hydrocodone-Acetaminophen (a medication used to relieve severe pain). There was no licensed staff signature on the CDR indicating the medication was administered. LN1 verbalized the CDR should have been signed by the nurse administering the medication.During a review of the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Medication Administration Controlled Substance, dated 9/16, the P&P indicated, When a controlled medication is administered, the licensed nurse administering the medication immediately enters the following information on the accountability record when removing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-09 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to dispose of expired medical supplies from a wound treatment cart (a mobile cart containing equipment, and supplies needed to treat wounds.)This facility failure had the potential for staff to utilize deteriorated and ineffective healthcare supplies for treatment of patients. Findings:During a concurrent observation and interview on [DATE] at 9:40 a.m. with Licensed Nurse (LN) 1 at the nurse's station, the wound treatment cart was inspected. Two one ounce bottles of Stomahesive powder (a non-medicated powder used to absorb moisture from slightly irritated or moist skin around the stoma - an ostomy is surgery to create an opening (stoma) from an area inside the body to the outside) were observed with an expiration date of [DATE]. LN1 verbalized all staff are responsible for making sure expired supplies are removed from the cart, these supplies should have been destroyed.During a review of the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 22 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-09 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolatedProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food safety requirements were met when:1) Two dietary aides (DAs 1 and 2) did not completely cover their hair, with the required hair restraint, while in the food preparation area. 2) Dietary staff did not follow the facility's policy and procedure when cleaning and sanitizing kitchen surfaces. 3) Contaminated food was not removed from dry food storage area. These failures had the potential to cause food borne illness to the residents. 1) During an observation on 1/9/26 at 9:41 a.m. with Director of Nutrition Services (DNS), in the food preparation area, DAs 1 and 2 hair restraints were noted not properly covering the hair area. During a review of facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Hair Restraints, dated 2020, the P&P indicated, Hair restraints, hats and beard covers will be worn in the food production area by all staff to prevent hair from falling into food. 2) During a review of the facility's P&P titled, Cleaning Instructions for Work Tables and Counters, dated 2020, the P&P indicated,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-09 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the informed consent [a resident's right to make an informed voluntary decision about their care, requiring providers to clearly explain their health status, treatment risks/benefits, alternatives (including refusal)] for psychotropic medication (any drug that affects brain activities associated with mental processes and behavior) had accurate information for one of three sampled residents (Resident 8).This failure had the potential to result in Resident 8 receiving inappropriate care and treatment.Findings:During a review of Resident 8's admission Record (AR), dated 1/8/26, the AR indicated, Resident 8 was a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with admission diagnoses including, Alzheimer's disease (a progressive brain disorder that primarily affects memory, thinking, and behavior), dementia with mood disturbance (a pattern of mental decline caused by different diseases or conditions), major depressive disorder (a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-09 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure infection control practices were implemented when: Laundry washing machine water temperatures were below the minimum required temperature for infection control. Personal protective equipment (PPE - protective equipment such as gloves, gowns, masks, and eye protection that creates a barrier to protect patients, healthcare workers from infectious materials, bloodborne pathogens, and other hazards, and to prevent the spread of illness to others) was not readily available in four out of four residents (Residents 6, 27, 36, and 48) on enhanced barrier precautions (EBP - Infection control measures the involves wearing PPE for specific high-contact tasks such as bathing, transfers, and wound care for at-risk residents to stop germ spread). These facility failures had the potential to result in cross-contamination (the transfer of harmful bacteria) that could impact residents' health and safety and cause preventable HAIs (Healthcare…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-18 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure documentation by Social Services Designee (SSD) was completed for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) medical records regarding allegations of abuse involving Resident 1.This facility failure resulted in Resident 1's medical record not accurately reflecting SSD follow-up on abuse allegations, potentially impacting the adequacy of care for Resident 1.During a review of Resident 1's admission Record, [undated], the admission Record indicated, Resident 1 was 94 years-old, admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses: senile degeneration of brain (decline in cognitive abilities that occurs with aging), generalized anxiety disorder (mental condition with excessive or unrealistic anxiety about two or more aspects of life), schizoaffective disorder bipolar type (a mental health condition that combines symptoms of schizophrenia [chronic mental health condition that affects a person's thoughts, feelings, and behavior] and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-07-08 · tag F0557 — isolatedHonor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the personal property inventory list was updated for one of two sampled residents (Resident 1). This facility failure had the potential for Resident 1's belongings to be lost or unaccounted for. Findings: During an interview with the Social Services staff (SS) on 7/2/25 at 11:08 a.m., the SS stated that Resident 1 had complained she could not locate a pair of pants she purchased (online store name). The SS assisted Resident 1 and located the missing pants, which had a tag with the resident's name. During an interview with Licensed Nurse 1 (LN1) on 7/2/25 at 11:22 a.m., LN1 stated that when a resident brings in new clothing, facility staff should label the items and update the inventory list kept in the resident's closet. During an interview with Certified Nursing Assistant 1 (CNA1) on 7/2/25 at 11:30 a.m., CNA1 stated that when a resident brings in new clothes, staff should label them and update the resident's inventory list when placing them in the closet. During a concurrent interview and record review with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-01-24 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and review of facility documents, the facility failed to ensure food was stored, prepared, distributed and served in accordance with professional standards for food service safety when: 1. The high temperature dish machine was not reaching 150 degrees Fahrenheit (F) for the wash cycle and 180 degrees F for the rinse cycle and the facility did not have a mechanism to verify the plate level temperature was reached according to their policy and procedure; and 2. [NAME] 2 (C2) did not change gloves after touching raw meat then touching other items. These failures resulted in equipment, utensils, dishware and silverware not being properly cleaned and sanitized and had the potential to result in the growth of microorganisms which can cause foodborne illness for the 49 residents eating food from the kitchen. Findings: 1. During a concurrent observation and interview on 1/21/25 at 10:35 a.m. with Dishwasher 1 (DW1), the last rack was observed being placed in the dish machine. DW 1 stated he knows the dish machine is working properly when the wash temperature…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-24 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the medical record for resident and interview with the facility's Director of Nursing (DON) on 1/23/2025, regarding resident 20's blood pressures, the facility had failed to ensure that this resident's blood pressure monitoring had been ordered by the resident's physician and not by the facility's nursing staff. The facility also failed to develop a policy and procedure which identified hypotension for the nursing staff. The facility's failure had the potential to put this resident at risk of severe hypotension which could result in ultimate organ failure and shock. Findings: Review of resident 20's clinical record revealed that this resident had been admitted to the facility on [DATE]. On revealed that this resident's physician had ordered, Coreg 6.25mg (a blood pressure medication) to be given twice daily for hypertension, please give with meals. without any blood pressure or pulse parameters on 9/11/2024. This resident continued to receive his Coreg from 9/12/2024 to 10/13/2024 without…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-24 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to monitor the medication refrigerator temperature twice a day and maintain the temperature within acceptable range. This failure had the potential for the residents to receive ineffective medications due to improper storage. Findings: During an interview on 1/21/25 at 3:26 p.m. with the Director of Nursing (DON), in the medication storage room, the DON stated the temperatures of the refrigerator in the medication storage room are monitored once a day in degrees Fahrenheit (F). During a concurrent interview and record review on 1/21/25 at 4:20 p.m., with the DON, Medical Room Refrigerator Temperature Monitoring Log (MRRTML), for October 2024, November 2024, and December 2024 were reviewed. The MRRTMLs indicated the following temperatures in Farenheit (F): 12/8/24: 34 degrees 11/14/24: 34 degrees 11/22/24: 34 degrees 11/24/24: 30 degrees 11/27/24: 32 degrees 11/28/24: 34 degrees 11/29/24: 34 degrees 11/30/24: 34 degrees 10/12/24: 32 degrees Additionally, the MRRTML indicated Report all temperatures that do not meet standards.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-01-24 · tag F0800 — patternProvide each resident with a nourishing, palatable, well-balanced diet that meets his or her daily nutritional and special dietary needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to ensure residents were provided a well-balanced, physician prescribed diet that met their nutritional needs when meal ticket and diet order did not match for seven (7) residents (Residents 7, 23, 29, 34, 35, 37, and 38). This failure had the potential for residents to receive incorrect diets and have nutritional deficits. Findings: During a concurent observation and interview in the kitchen on 1/21/25 starting at 11:45 a.m. with the Director of Dining Srvices (DDS), a lunch meal service was observed. Resident 33's meal ticket showed the resident was on a puree small portion diet. Further review of the meal ticket indicated, the resident was to receive a #6 scoop (5.33 ounces) of lamb. The DDS stated was not sure why the meal ticket showed #6 scoop, but they use half portions on all items when serving a small portion diet. During a concurrent interview and record review on 1/23/2025 at 10:56 a.m. with Registered Dietitian (RD), the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-24 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — patternEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the menus were followed when: 1. The incorrect portion sizes for meat and vegetables were served for the puree diet during the lunch meal on 1/22/25 for four residents (Residents 2, 3, 29, 35); and 2. The incorrect portion sizes were served for one resident (Resident 30) for the lunch meal on 1/21/25. This failure has the potential to result in residents not having their nutritional needs met. Findings: 1. During a review of the facility document titled, Daily Spreadsheet, dated 1/22/25 for the lunch meal, the Daily Spreadsheet indicated, for the puree diet, #6 scoop (2/3 cup) [NAME] broil (red meat), 1 ounce gravy, #8 scoop (1/2 cup) puree potatoes, and #10 scoop (3/8 cup) puree zucchini. During a concurrent observation and record review on 1/22/25 at 11:49 a.m., the lunch meal service steamtable contained puree meat ([NAME] broil) with a #8 scoop (1/4 cup), puree zucchini with a #8 scoop and mashed potatoes with a #8 scoop. [NAME]…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-24 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (POLST- a form that documents a resident's treatment wishes in the event of a medical emergency) matched the electronic medical record (EMR) in one of one sampled resident (Resident 23). This failure had the potential to cause a delay in receiving or incorrectly administering life-sustaining treatments. Findings: During a review of Resident 23's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated, Resident 23 is a [AGE] year-old female admitted on [DATE] with diagnosis of senile degeneration of the brain (a brain and nerve disorder characterized by a progressive decline in cognitive function [how a person thinks, behaves, and their ability to remember things], impacting memory, reasoning, and the ability to perform everyday activities). During a concurrent interview and record review on [DATE] at 10:01 a.m. with the Minimum Data Set Coordinator (MDS 1), Resident 23's POLST was reviewed. The POLST dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-24 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop a care plan to address Restorative Nursing Assistant (RNA) services for one of three sampled resident (Resident 27). This failure had the potential for care and services not to be provided to Resident 27 that could potentially cause a decline in mobility and muscle strength. Findings: During a review of Resident 27's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated, Resident 27 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including muscle weakness (generalized), other abnormalities of gait (the way a person walks) and mobility, and repeated falls. During a concurrent interview and record review on 1/24/25 at 9:36 a.m. with the Minimum Data Set Coordinator (MDS 1), Resident 27's order summary report (OSR) was reviewed. The OSR indicated, RNA Range of Motion (active) right upper extremity AROM (active range of motion) / PROM (passive range of motion) exercises to maintain mobility RNA: Range of Motion (passive) right upper extremity AROM/PROM exercises to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-24 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of the medical record for resident, interview with the resident's nurse, and interview with the facility's Director of Nursing (DON) on 1/23/2025, regarding resident 247, the facility failed to ensure that Standards of Practice regarding Tachycardic pulses which resulted in abnormal results, had been addressed by the facility and medical staff. The facility also failed to develop a policy and procedure which identified tachycardia. This failure had the potential to put this resident at risk for a heart attack or a stroke. Findings: Review of resident 247's clinical record revealed that this resident, had an elevated Pulse recorded in the resident's medical record on the evening of 1/22/2025. This resident's pulse had been recorded as 103 beats per minute, which had been flagged in the nurse's computer as being highlighted in red by the facility's computer system to help bring this resident's elevated pulse to the nurse's attention. Review of the textbook, the Fundamentals of Nursing, 11th edition, which had been dated, 2023, (which represents the Standard of Nursing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-24 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — isolatedKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure and validate the dishwashing machine was functioning properly and was in safe operating condition when the temperatures of the wash and rinse were not reaching manufacturer's directions. This failure had the potential to result in temperatures not reaching proper temperature levels which led to all the dishware, silverware, utensils, pots and pans not being sanitized to which can result in the growth of microorganisms which can lead to food borne illness for the highly susceptible population that was eating at the facility. The facility census was 49. Findings: During an observation on 1/22/25 at 9:17 a.m. in main kitchen at dishwashing station, dishwashing rinse temp gauge read 124F and dishwashing wash temp gauge read 128F. During an interview on 1/22/25 at 9:30 a.m. with Director of Dietary Services (DDS), the DDS states staff use display gauges on front of machine to confirm machine temperatures. DDS states they have no other method for temperature validation. During a concurrent observation and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-07-28 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe food handling and sanitation when: 1.Expired pizza sauce per the facility's refrigerated shelf- life guidance was available for use in the walk-in refrigerator. 2. Opened bag of cheese was not dated when opened to have a system to follow the facility's Refrigerated Storage Chart, shelf-life guidance. 3. The dry food storage room stored an undated opened bag of pasta, multiple large, unopened canned foods not dated with a received date, ingredient bins containing flour, and thicken-up were not dated, and a dented can of tuna was available for use. 4. The wall located by the clean side of the high temperature dish machine had extensive black colored substance on the surface of the wall. And the covers to the light fixture in the dish machine room were cracked and broken which posed a risk for foreign object cross-contamination. 5. The preparation of cantaloupe was not done in accordance with food safety standards of practice. 6. The facility lacked temperature monitoring of the refrigerator located…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-07-28 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure standard infection control practices were followed when: 1. A Housekeeping Staff (HK 1) did not use gloves while sweeping and collecting trash inside a resident's room (room [ROOM NUMBER]), and did not perform hand hygiene after contact with potentially contaminated items. 2. A Licensed Nurse (LN 1) did not sanitize the handheld inhaler of one unsampled resident (Resident 34) before and after use and did not perform hand hygiene after contact with the resident. 3. LN 5 did not sanitize a glucometer test kit (a kit containing test strips and a device used to measure blood sugar) and perform hand hygiene after checking the blood sugar of one of 14 sampled residents (Resident 24). 4. Expired catheter stabilization device (a device, alternative to tape, used to secure catheters in place) and an opened, non-reusable wound care dressings were found in the treatment cart (storage for medical and treatment supplies). These failures had the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-28 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to initiate a care plan for one of 14 sampled residents (Resident 19), to prevent a pressure ulcer (an injury that breaks down the skin and underlying tissue) on the buttocks from developing or getting worse. This failure resulted in the development of two stage I (first stage- shearing off of the first layer of the skin ) pressure ulcers to the left and right buttocks. Findings: During a review of facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Care Planning, dated 2/11/20, the P&P indicated in part, .To assure all residents care needs are identified through continuous assessments and those needs are care planned .All residents will have a comprehensive care plan to meet their individual needs . During a review of Resident 19's admission Record, dated 3/2/23, the record indicated, resident is a [AGE] year-old with admitting diagnoses including Multiple Sclerosis (nervous system disease that affects your brain and spinal cord) and is confined…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-28 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure an accurate, and effective system for monitoring parameters of nutritional status when: 1. An order for a therapeutic (to cure or restore to health) liquid nutritional supplement (Mighty Shake) was not documented as being provided and lacked documentation of quantity of consumption of the therapeutic nutrition supplement for effective monitoring pertaining to parameters of nutritional status for one of ? sampled residents (Resident 41). 2. Speech therapist (ST) recommendation for 1:1 supervision during mealtimes was not communicated via an order to ensure the recommendation based on ST assessment would be implemented for Resident 41's health and safety when the texture of a diet order was modified. Failure to consistently ensure nutrition interventions were carried out and monitored had the potential to ineffectively evaluate nutrition interventions and delay an alternative nutrition approach, if necessary, to help prevent or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-07-28 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — isolatedProvide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a nutrition services employee had the appropriate competency and skill set to carry out the function of accurately completing the Dishmachine Temperature Log. The facility failure to have accurate documentation of dish machine temperatures and lack of monitoring of the dishmachine temperature log impeded the facility's ability to identify temperature problems that could have occurred for prompt resolution to ensure the health and safety of residents. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 07/25/23, at 10:36 a.m., with Nutrition Services employee (NS) 4, in the main kitchen, NS 4 was observed running resident dishes through the high temperature dish machine. NS 4 stated, he was responsible for completing the Dishmachine Temperature Log (DTL). In the presence of the Director of Nutrition Services (DNS), who translated in Spanish to NS 4, NS 4 was asked to show or explain how he documented the temperature for the Wash Temp [temperature] column located on the DTL. NS 4 showed the wash…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-28 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolatedEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow the menu as planned when: 1. The SB 6 (Soft, Bite Sized Food) diet was not followed related to the size of meat in accordance with the facility's planned menu, and Diet Manual for SB 6 diet for two of 14 sampled residents (Resident 35 and Resident 3). 2. A regular portion diet was not followed per the planned menu, and diet order, for one of 14 sampled residents (Resident 8) when small portions were served by a cook in the main kitchen. This failure had the potential to not meet the resident's nutritional needs per the planned menu as approved by the facility's Registered Dietitian. In addition, not following the correct size of meat for a SB 6 diet had the potential to place resident's at an increased risk of choking. Findings: 1. During a concurrent observation and interview on 07/25/23, at 12:19 p.m., in the kitchenette next to the main dining room, licensed nurse (LN) 1 was observed lifting the lid that covered Resident 3's lunch plate and compared it to Resident 3's diet order listed on Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-07-28 · tag F0868 — isolatedHave the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure its required QAA (Quality Assessment and Assurance) Committee (a committee organized by the facility which is responsible for developing and implementing corrective action plans for identified quality deficiencies) members included a credentialed Infection Preventionist [(IP - a staff trained to have oversight of the facility's infection prevention and control program (IPCP)]. This failure had the potential to result in the facility's IPCP not getting implemented effectively which could lead to misinformation, inadequate surveillance and reporting, and spread of healthcare associated infections. Findings: During a review of the facility's policy and procedures (P&P) titled, QAPI (Quality Assurance Performance Improvement - an ongoing process that guides the facility's efforts in assuring care and services are maintained at acceptable level of performance), dated 11/6/17, the P&P failed to indicate the facility-designated IP as a member of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-07-28 · tag F0882 — isolatedDesignate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to designate a credentialed Infection Preventionist [(IP - a staff trained to have oversight of the facility's infection prevention and control program (IPCP)]. This failure had the potential for no coordination of infection control practices, increasing the risk of infections for residents, staff, visitors and others in the facility. Findings: During a review of the CMS (Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services) Memorandum QSO-19-10-NH, dated 3/11/19, the memo indicated in part, The CMS and CDC collaborated on the development of a free on-line training course in infection prevention and control for nursing home staff in the long-term care setting . Effective November 28, 2019, the final requirement includes specialized training in infection prevention and control for the individual(s) responsible for the facility's IPCP. The memo indicated further, . The course if approximately 19 hours long and is made up of 23 modules and submodules . In order to receive continuing education for the course and a certificate of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SOLVANG LUTHERAN HOME, INC. | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 10/04/1973 |
| PARKER, CHRISTOPHER | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 08/15/2011 |
| CIRONE, WILLIAM | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 02/27/2024 |
| ENOCH, VERVA | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 01/01/2023 |
| FAZIO, MARIA | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 02/27/2024 |
| STREEGEN-CATANI, CATHERINE | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 01/01/2025 |
| ZLAKET, MICHAEL | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 02/27/2024 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 8 rows in the source record cover these 7 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in CA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 056353. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-01-09, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.