Good Samaritan Rehab And Care Center
1630 N. Edison Street, Stockton, CA 95204 · For profit - Corporation · 98 certified beds · (209) 948-8762 Medicare & Medicaid certified
The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- a high payroll-based staffing rating (5/5)
- lower-than-typical staff turnover (24% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
- a high number of inspection citations overall (45) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 5 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 4 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 4 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 5 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 15.6% | 10.2% | 15.4% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 0.0% | 4.0% | 5.4% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 1.3% | 0.8% | 0.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 1.7% | 1.2% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 0.0% | 7.3% | 6.5% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.4% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 0.0% | 1.6% | 3.3% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 18.3% | 9.8% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 6.6% | 13.7% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 98.2% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 2.9% | 4.3% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 10.8% | 10.2% | 21.2% | typical for the state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 15.0% | 12.0% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 2.3% | 1.5% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 93.2% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 14.6% | 23.0% | 22.6% | better |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 4.2% | 11.2% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.73 | 2.25 | 1.67 | typical |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 0.56 | 1.57 | 1.80 | better |
* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
41.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 33 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 48.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 29 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.24 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 32% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 24% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 41.6%CMS range 27.1–57.9 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 9.8%CMS range 6.1–15.8 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 48.3% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 55.2% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 44.8% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 79.5% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 2.6% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 8.3%CMS range 4.5–12.1 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.55 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 98 beds and averages 81.2 residents a day — about 83% occupied, or roughly 17 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.28 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.60 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.71 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.63 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.54 on weekdays — 20% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.72 to 0.30 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 24% is below the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
45 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 35 are one tap away and print in full.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-25 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide pain management consistent with professional standards of practice for one of one sampled resident (Resident 1) who experienced severe pain when:1) Pain medication was not administered consistent with the physician's orders and reported pain levels,2) Resident 1's physician ordered narcotic (a strong medicine that relieves severe pain and has a high addiction potential) pain medication was not available; and,3) The physician was not notified when Resident 1 reported uncontrolled severe pain (high-level pain). This failure caused Resident 1 to endure unnecessary pain and suffering and placed the resident at risk for prolonged discomfort, emotional distress, and decreased quality of life. Findings:Review of Resident 1's admission RECORD, indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility with a diagnosis of, but not limited to chronic pain syndrome (long-lasting pain that continues even after the original injury or illness has healed), acquired absence of limb (something that develops later in life, not something you…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-07-08 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of five sampled residents, (Resident 3) who was dependent on staff to carry out activities of daily living, (ADLs, tasks of everyday life including eating, dressing, bathing, showering, and using the bathroom) received services to maintain personal hygiene when Resident 3 was not provided with once weekly showers for two months.This failure had the potential to cause discomfort, skin impairment, infection, and a decline in emotional and psychological well-being.Findings:A review of Resident 3's clinical record titled, admission Record, indicated Resident 3 was admitted to the facility in 2018 with diagnoses which included Cerebral Infarction (a result of disrupted blood flow of the brain - also known as a stroke), Hemiplegia (unable to move a part of the body), and Hemiparesis (muscle weakness on one side of the body).A review of Resident 3's clinical record titled, Minimum Data Set, (MDS, a comprehensive care assessment tool) indicated that Resident 3 was dependent of the staff for completion of ADLs.During a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-08 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to maintain the confidentiality of two of three sampled residents (Resident 6 and Resident 7) when portions of Resident 6's and Resident 7's medical records were discovered in Resident 3's medical record.This failure had the potential for exposure of Resident 6's and Resident 7's private and confidential information to unauthorized individuals.Findings:A review of Resident 3's clinical record titled, admission Record, indicated Resident 3 was admitted to the facility in 2018 with diagnoses which included Cerebral Infarction (a result of disrupted blood flow of the brain, also known as a stroke), Hemiplegia (unable to moved parts of the body), and Hemiparesis (muscle weakness on one side of the body).A review of Resident 6's clinical record titled, admission Record, indicated that Resident 6 was admitted to the facility in 2014 with diagnoses which included Respiratory Failure (disease that can cause shortness of breath, anxiety, and confusion).A review of Resident 7's clinical record titled, admission Record,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-02-21 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — widespreadKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the protection to residents' personal information for a census of 81 when meal tray tickets (contained resident names and other identifying information) were thrown into the trash and outside dumpsters. This failure had the potential for identity theft and misuse of personal information. Findings: During an observation of dishwashing on 2/18/25, at 9:24 AM, with Dietary Aid 1 (DA 1) in the kitchen, DA 1 was observed removing items from residents breakfast trays. DA 1 was threw the meal tray tickets from the breakfast trays into the regular trash along with food scraps. During a concurrent observation and interview on 2/18/25, at 12:56 PM, with DA 2 in the kitchen, DA 2 was observed removing items from the residents breakfast trays. DA 1 was throwing the meal tickets from the breakfast trays into the regular trash along with food scraps. DA 2 confirmed this was the facility's practice of disposal of meal tray tickets. During an interview with the Registered Dietician (RD) on 2/21/25, at 1:26 PM, the RD…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-02-21 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide safe food storage and preparation, as well as maintain kitchen equipment and food contact surfaces in accordance with professional standards for food safety for the 81 residents who ate facility prepared meals when: 1. Raw chicken was left thawing in the sink without running water; 2. Over-ripe and spoiled produce was available for use in the walk-in refrigerator; 3. Leftover food was kept beyond a safe time frame, incorrectly dated, and the cool down process was omitted; 4. Staff food was stored in the walk-in refrigerator which contained resident food and placed on top of cooked food; 5. Boxes of food, drinks, supplies, and food products were found on the floor in the dry storage room; 6. Non-food items and staff personal items were stored in the dry storage room; 7. Dented cans were found in the dry storage room ready to serve; 8. Clean food service items were found put away wet such as trays and steam table pans; and 9. The oven was found dirty with layers of grease and food debris. These failures…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-02-21 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — widespreadKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain equipment in safe operating condition when: 1. The can opener was found with layers of metal shavings and food particles; and 2. The dishwashing machine remained below manufacture required temperature of 120 degrees. These deficient practices had the potential to compromise food safety for the 81 residents receiving food from the facility. Findings: 1. During the initial kitchen tour on 2/18/25 at 8:45 AM, in the presence of [NAME] (CK) 1, the can opener was found with paint chipped off, food debris, and layer of metal shavings behind the blade. CK 1 confirmed the findings. During an interview with the Registered Dietician (RD) on 2/21/25, the RD stated the can opener should be cleaned regularly. The RD stated, there was a cleaning schedule for the staff to follow. The RD stated the can opener was dirty and for all of the metal build up staff had been taught to use a wired brush to clean the can opener properly. The RD stated, this did not meet her expectations and posed a risk to the residents as a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-02-21 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — widespreadMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the environment was free of pests for a census of 81 residents when roaches were found in front and beneath the microwave that was used to reheat foods for the residents. This failure had the potential for the cross-contamination of foods stored in the resident's refrigerator, and foods being reheated in the resident's microwave, resulting in food-borne illnesses. Findings: During a concurrent interview and observation with the Certified Dietary Manager (CDM) on 2/18/25 at 4:41 PM, The resident's microwave that was used to reheat the residents outside food, was found with layers of old food splatters. The CDM stated the house keeping were the ones cleaning the microwave. During a follow up observation on the microwave to reheat the residents' food on 2/21/25 at 9:13 AM, prior to opening the microwave, a roach was found walking in front of the microwave. During a concurrent interview and observation with the House Keeping Supervisor (HS) on 2/21/25 at 9:20 AM, the HS confirmed the splatters that were…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-21 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure privacy and dignity were maintained for 1 of 21 sampled residents (Resident 287) when, Resident 287's urinary catheter bag (a bag that collects urine draining from the bladder) did not have a privacy cover over it. This failure had the potential to negatively impact Resident 287's feelings of dignity and self-worth. Findings: During an observation on 2/18/25, at 12:25 PM, in Resident 287's room, Resident 287's urinary catheter bag was not covered with a privacy cover. During a concurrent observation and interview on 2/18/25, at 12:25 PM, with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 1 in Resident 287's room, CNA 1 stated the urinary catheter bag hanging on the bed did not have a privacy cover. CNA 1 stated it should have been covered for privacy and dignity of Resident 287. During a concurrent observation and interview on 2/18/25, at 12:36 PM, with Licensed Nurse (LN) 1 in Resident 287's room, LN 1 confirmed the urinary catheter bag was hanging on the bed and not covered (with a privacy cover). LN 1 stated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-21 · tag F0552 — isolatedEnsure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 21 sampled residents (Resident 29) was informed in advance by a physician or other professional in charge of Resident 29's care of the risks and benefits of psychotropic medication use (any drug capable of affecting the mind, emotions, and behavior) when Risperidone (medicine which may help symptoms such as aggressive or agitated behavior for some mental health conditions) and Valproic Acid (a medication which may help reduce behaviors that can include agitation, restlessness, combativeness, and verbal aggression) were prescribed and given without consent from Resident 29's Responsible Party (Resident 29's responsible party was a conservator-a person appointed by a court to make medical decisions for another adult who cannot care for themselves). The failure had the potential for not honoring the resident's right to be informed about his medical treatment including medication side effects or other alternative options. Findings: A review of Resident 29's admission RECORD, indicated Resident 29 was admitted to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-21 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure an environment free of accidents or hazards for two of five residents (Resident 288 and Resident 61) whom smoked when: 1. Resident 288 smoked a cigarette in the facility courtyard without supervision; and 2. Resident 61 kept a cigarette lighter in his room that was accessible to other residents. These failures had the potential to place Resident 288 and other residents in the facilit,y with a census of 81, at risk for accidental burns and injuries. Findings: 1. A review of Resident 288's admission RECORD, indicated that Resident 288 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses which included metabolic encephalopathy (a change in how the brain works which causes confusion, memory loss and loss of consciousness). During an observation in the facility courtyard on 2/19/25, at 7:58 a.m., Resident 288 and the Nursing Assistant (NA) were outside in the courtyard. The NA lit Resident 288's cigarette with a cigarette lighter and left Resident 288 in the courtyard to smoke. During am interview on 2/19/25, at 8…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 35 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-21 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide accurate administration of medication for 1 out of 16 residents (Resident 62) observed during medication administration when, Resident 62's medication was given when her vital signs were outside of prescribed parameters. This failure had the potential for Resident 62 to experience an adverse reaction to her prescribed medication. Findings: A review of Resident 62's admission RECORD indicated that Resident 62 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses which included cerebral infarction ( a result of disrupted blood flow of the brain due to problems with the blood vessels that supply it, also known as stroke) and hypertension (a condition in which the force of blood pushing against the blood vessel walls is consistently too high which causes the heart to work harder to pump blood). During an interview and concurrent medication administration observation with Licensed Nurse (LN) 7 on 2/19/25, at 4:15 p.m., LN 7 checked Resident 62's blood pressure and obtained a reading of 102/57. LN 7 then administered…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-21 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe medication and medical supplies storage in the medication cart, treatment cart, medication refrigerator, and the medication storge room for a census of 81 when: 1. Staff beverages, and staff belongings were stored in the medication storage rooms; 2. The medication refrigerator in the medication storge room which contained narcotics was not locked; 3. Expired medications and opened unlabeled medications were stored in the medication cart; 4. Multi-use wound care irrigation solutions in the treatment cart were opened but not dated; 5. Expired single use wound care ointment and cream, expired multi-use wound care ointments, and expired wound dressing material were stored in the treatment cart; and, 6. A single use sterile dressing in the treatment cart was opened but not discarded. These failures could contribute to unsafe medication use, storage, and medication errors that could affect the well-being of the facility's vulnerable elderly residents. Findings: During a concurrent observation and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-21 · tag F0825 — isolatedProvide or get specialized rehabilitative services as required for a resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide Physical Therapy (PT- the treatment of disease, injury, or deformity by physical methods such as message, heat treatment, and exercise) and Occupational Therapy (OT- treatment that helps improve the ability to perform daily tasks) services to one of twenty one sampled residents (Resident 81), when Resident 81 did not receive a PT/OT evaluation and treatment as ordered. This failure had the potential for Resident 81 not to attain, maintain, or restore his highest practicable level of physical, mental, functional, and psycho-social well-being. Findings: A review of Resident 81's admission RECORD indicated Resident 81 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses which included generalized muscle weakness, repeated falls, and other symptoms and signs involving cognitive functions and awareness. A review of Resident 81's physician orders dated 1/10/25, indicated Resident 81 had orders for OT Evaluation and Treatment as indicated and PT Evaluation & Treatment as indicated. Further review of Resident 81's record failed to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-21 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain and obtain complete medical records for 1 out of 21 sampled residents (Resident 72), when Resident 72's medical record did not contain progress notes from the primary care provider. This failure resulted in an incomplete reflection of Resident 72's progress toward achieving her person-centered plan of care and potentially resulted in insufficient information for the staff to facilitate communication among the interdisciplinary team that provided care for Resident 72. Findings: During an observation on 2/18/25 at 11:23 AM, Resident 72 was observed scratching her chest and upper extremities. During an interview on 2/19/25 at 10:45 AM, License Nurse (LN) 5 stated that Resident 72 was under the care of an outside primary care provider who was treating her and prescribing her medications. A review of Resident 72's medical record failed to show progress notes from her outside primary care provider. During a concurrent interview and record review, on 2/20/25 at 4:04 PM, Resident 72's medical records were…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-21 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — isolatedHave a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide evidence of the ongoing efforts of a Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI- a data driven and proactive approach used to continuously identify opportunities for improving the overall quality of life and quality of care and services to nursing home residents) program/plan for a resident census of 81. This deficient practice had the potential for the facility to miss efforts to identify, report, investigate, analyze, and prioritize identified concerns in the facility. Findings: During an interview with the Administrator (ADM) on 2/18/25 at 1:15 PM, the ADM stated she would provide the QAPI documents as requested that morning during the Entrance Conference held at 9:17 AM. During a concurrent interview and record review on 2/18/25 at 5 PM, with the ADM, the Entrance Conference Worksheet, dated 10/23 was reviewed.The Entrance Conference Worksheet indicated, QAPI plan was listed on the worksheet under the heading INFORMATION NEEDED FROM FACILITY WITHIN FOUR HOURS OF ENTRANCE and the worksheet was provided…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-21 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide an environment free from the risk of infection for a census of 81 when staff refilled an empty soda bottle from the water dispenser at Nurse Station #3 with the water dispenser spout touching the mouth of the soda bottle. These failures resulted in the potential for the spread of infection to residents, visitors, and staff in the facility. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview, at Nursing Station #3, on 2/18/25, at 3:45 p.m., Medical Records Assistant (MR) 2 filled an empty plastic soda bottle with water from the resident water dispenser with the bottle mouthpiece touching the spout of the resident water dispenser. MR 2 confirmed that she refilled the empty plastic soda bottle with water from the resident water dispenser at the nurses' station with the mouth of the bottle touching the spout of the resident water dispenser. MR 2 stated that it was not acceptable to refill the soda bottle from the resident water dispenser with the mouth of the empty plastic soda bottle touching the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-21 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — isolatedImplement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Antibiotic Stewardship Program (ASP- a federally mandated program that includes a set of practices to ensure antibiotics are used appropriately) was followed for one of two sampled residents (Resident 42) on an antibiotic when: 1. Resident 42 developed signs and symptoms of a Urinary Tract Infection (UTI-an infection of the urinary system) and the facility's ANTIBIOTIC STEWARDSHIP GUIDELINE (a set of rules for identifying infections in long-term care facilities) used as part of ASP was not initiated for Resident 42; 2. The Infection Preventionist (IP) was not aware Resident 42 was prescribed antibiotics and did not add Resident 42 to the ANTIBIOTIC STARTS TRACKING log, the MONTHLY SURVEILLANCE REPORT FORM, or the ANTIBIOTIC LOG; and 3. An antibiotic time-out (an active reassessment of an antibiotic prescription 48-72 hours after the medication's first dose) was not done for Resident 42. These failures had the potential to contribute to unsafe antibiotic use and monitoring in the facility for a census of 81 and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-10 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) was provided dialysis (the process of removing excess water, solutes, and toxins from the blood in people whose kidneys can no longer perform these functions naturally) care and services consistent with professional standards of practice when: 1. Resident 1 was unable to attend his scheduled dialysis session and his make-up dialysis session due to transport being unavailable; and, 2. Resident 1's monthly labs from the dialysis center were not available in Resident 1's medical record. The failure of unavailable transportation led to a delay in dialysis care for Resident 1 with a potential to alter Resident 1's health status. The failure to include Resident 1's labs in his medical record had the potential for a lapse in Resident 1's care between the facility and the dialysis center. Findings: 1. A review of Resident 1's admission Record indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility in 2022 with diagnoses that included hypertension, end stage renal disease (chronic…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-07 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — patternEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe practices in handling hazardous medications (Drugs that pose short- or long-term harm upon exposure to human via skin or inhalation) during storage and medication administration with a resident census of 79. The unsafe handling of hazardous medications could pose a health risk to staff and residents. Findings: 1. During a medication administration observation with Licensed Nurse (LN) 5, on 3/4/24, at 8:44 AM, at Hallway 3, LN 5 administered Resident 33's medication, in pill form, called valproic acid (or Depakote, used to treat seizure or used for mental issues) without using any gloves during preparation or administration of the medication. During a review of Resident 33's Medication Administration Record (or MAR, where nursing staff look at doctor's order during medication administration), dated 3/2024, the MAR did not have any instruction on how to handle the medication during pouring and administration related to hazardous drug handling. 2. During a medication administration observation with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-07 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — patternProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of 21 sampled resident's (Resident 28) pain was managed, when the facility did not notify the physician of Resident 28's severe pain, and treated Resident 28 with a medication ordered to manage mild to moderate pain. This failure resulted in Resident 28 experiencing unmanaged pain for long periods of time. Findings: During a review of Resident 28's clinical record titled, admission Record (a document that contains the resident's demographic information), the record indicated Resident 28's diagnoses included paralysis (inability to move the body) affecting the left side of the body following a stroke (occurs when something blocks blood supply to part of the brain or when a blood vessel in the brain bursts - causing parts of the brain to die). During an interview with Resident 28 on 3/6/24 at 1:38 p.m., Resident 28 stated his left leg was in pain. Resident 28 stated his left leg was crushed during the Vietnam War. Resident 28 stated it made him feel like a little kid when the facility would not give him the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-07 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure prescribed medication unavailability was communicated to the medical doctor and failed to ensure vital medications were available for administration for two residents (Resident 43 and Resident 80), in a sample of 21, when: 1. Anxiety and narcotic pain medications were not available for administration for Resident 43 with Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD); 2. Insulin (medication in shot form to treat high blood sugar level) was not available for Resident 80 with a diabetic (blood sugar disease) diagnosis. These failures had the potential to negatively impact Resident 43 and Resident 80's health and well-being. The facility also failed to ensure safe pharmaceutical services with medication disposal, waste, and the accountability of delivered medications based on standards of practice for a resident census of 79 when: 3. Pharmaceutical waste (discontinued or no longer needed drugs) including prescription and narcotic (drugs with potential for abuse) medications were not rendered unusable when disposed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-07 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure safe medication storage and labeling practices were based on standards of practice with census of 79 when: 1. The Emergency Kit (or Ekit- a supply of products for use when urgently needed) for IV (Intravenous, into the vein) medications was not labeled with a list of items or the earliest beyond use date (or expiration date) in medication room at Station 3. 2. Expired hand gel (a liquid gel for hand sanitization) bottles were stored in the active storage area in the medication room at Station 3. 3. Undated and opened medication container was stored in the unlocked refrigerator at Station 3's medication room where staff's personal bags were stored at the same time. 4. Undated, unsecured, and opened medication containers were stored in the medication room at Station 1 including the unlocked refrigerator where food items were stored along side medications. 5. Unlabeled and undated medications were stored in the active storage areas in medication cart 2, medication cart 3 and and treatment cart 2. These…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-07 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 3. During an interview on 3/7/24 at 11:40 a.m., the Administrator stated the facility did not have a policy and procedure for the required water management program. During an interview on 3/7/24 at 12:00 p.m., the Administrator stated she had worked at the facility for more than 10 years and there had never been a water management program at all during that time. During an interview on 3/7/24 at 12:05 p.m., the Infection preventionist stated the facility not having a water management program placed residents at risk for water borne illnesses. According to a memo released by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) to all healthcare facilities, dated 7/6/18, and titled, Requirement to Reduce Legionella [bacteria that can cause serious lung infections] Risk in Healthcare Facility Water Systems to Prevent Cases and Outbreaks of Legionnaires' Disease (LD), the memo indicated, . Legionella can cause a serious type of pneumonia [lung infection] .Those at risk include persons who are at least [AGE] years…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-07 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Physician's Orders for Life Sustaining Treatment (POLST- a written physician's order that documents the types of medical treatment the resident wants to receive during serious illness, for example, chest compressions if the heart stops beating and/or a tube placed down the throat if breathing stops) was fully completed and/or uploaded to the resident's Electronic Health Record ([EHR]- information stored in the facility's computer system) per facility policy for 1 of 21 sampled residents (Resident 64). This failure had the potential for a delay in treatment for Resident 64 during a medical emergency and/or the incorrect life sustaining treatment administered to Resident 64. Findings: A review of Resident 64's medical record titled, admission Record, indicated Resident 64 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses which included diabetes (problems with blood sugar) and dependence on renal dialysis (a procedure to remove waste products and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-07 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure 2 of 21 sampled residents (Resident 75 and Resident 81) received care and services safely when Resident 75 and Resident 81 were unable to open bathroom door #7. This failure led to feelings of entrapment (caught, trapped or entangled) and the inability to maintain independence with Activities of Daily Living (ADL - examples: toileting, shaving, brushing teeth). Findings: a. During a review of Resident 75's clinical record titled admission Record, (a document that contains the resident's demographic information), the record indicated Resident 75's diagnosis included muscle weakness. During an interview with Resident 75 on 3/5/24, at 10 a.m., Resident 75 stated she had not been able to open hallway bathroom door #7 by herself because the door was too heavy. A review of Resident 75's clinical record titled Minimum Data Set Section GG Functional Abilities and Goals, (MDS - an assessment tool utilized for facilitating care management in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-07 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement psychotropic (mind altering medications often used to treat mood disorder, anxiety, or depression) and high-risk medication (medication known to cause serious harmful effect due to nature of the product) care plans (a component of care that outlines nursing care to provide coordinated and resident specific care to improve overall health and ensure appropriate nursing actions) for 3 out of 21 sampled residents (Resident 80, Resident 57, and Resident 28) when: 1. Resident 80's psychotropic medication use was not care planned for the licensed staff to monitor the progress and use of the two medications called duloxetine (also known as Cymbalta mind altering medication used to treat depression) and cariprazine (also known as Vraylar, a mind-altering drug used to treat mood disorder), 2. Resident 80's blood thinner medication (by thinning the blood , the medicine could cause bleeding and at the same time prevented blood clot formation, heart attack or stroke) use was not care planned for the licensed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-07 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a safe environment, and adequate supervision for one of four sampled residents (Resident 72) when: 1. Resident 72's fall risk assessment was not completed accurately and fall interventions were not updated after Resident 72 experienced multiple falls in February of 2024; and, 2. Resident 72 eloped (leaving) from the facility on 1/29/24, without staff being aware until they were contacted by the police department. These failures may have contributed to Resident 72's recurrent falls and the potential for serious injury, negatively effecting Resident 72's health and well-being. Findings: 1. During a review of Resident 72's clinical record titled, admission Record, (a document that contains the resident's demographic information) indicated Resident 72's diagnosis included epilepsy (a brain disorder that leads to involuntary movements), Merrf syndrome (a syndrome that results in brief, sudden, jerking muscle movements, impaired ability to coordinate movements), and muscle weakness. During an observation on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-07 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow the Physician's orders for one of 34 residents receiving supplemental (additional) oxygen (Resident 80). This failure resulted in Resident 80 receiving over twice the ordered amount of supplemental oxygen and could have led to injury due to a diagnosis of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD - long term inflammatory lung disease that causes obstructed airflow from the lungs and too much oxygen could cause a person to lose their drive to breathe). Findings: During a review of Resident 80's clinical record titled, admission Record (a document that contains the resident's demographic information), the record indicated Resident 80's diagnosis included COPD and asthma (chronic lung disease that can cause coughing, wheezing, and shortness of breath). A review of Resident 80's clinical record titled, Physician Orders, dated 1/17/2024, indicated Resident 80 had a physician's order for supplemental oxygen at 2 Liters (L) via nasal canula (device that delivers extra oxygen through a tube and into the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-07 · tag F0700 — isolatedTry different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to apply appropriate siderails for 1 of 21 sampled residents (Resident 63), when Resident 63 was ordered half siderails but was found with two full bed siderails in use. This failure had the potential to cause restricted exiting from the bed, increased risk of injury, increased depression, and entrapment. Findings: A review of Resident 63's medical document titled, admission Record, indicated Resident 63 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses which included post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD - a disorder that develops when a person has experienced or witnessed a scary, shocking, terrifying, or dangerous event), and depression. During an observation in Resident 63's room, on 3/5/24, at 9:51 AM, Resident 63 was lying in bed with her eyes open. Resident 63's bed was equipped with full siderails bilaterally (on both sides of the bed) which were up at the time of the observation. Resident 63 was non-interviewable. During an observation in Resident 63's room, on 3/6/24, at 3:15 PM, Resident 63 was lying in bed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-07 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to monitor the adverse effects of high-risk medications (medication known to cause serious harmful effect due to nature of the product) in two out of five residents (Resident 80 and Resident 57) sampled for unnecessary drugs when: 1. Resident 80's blood thinner medications (by thinning the blood , the medicine could cause bleeding and at the same time prevent blood clot formation, heart attack or stroke) was not monitored for adverse effects of apixaban (also known as Eliquis, drug used to prevent blood clot by thinning the blood), ticagrelor (also known as Brilinta, drug used to thin the blood to prevent stroke or heart attack) and naproxen (also known as Naprosyn, a pain medication known to have bleeding side effects) with a known adverse bleeding side effects per manufacturer drug information; and, 2. Resident 57's blood thinner medication was not monitored for adverse effect of clopidogrel (also known as Plavix, drug used to thin the blood to prevent stroke or heart attack) and aspirin (a drug often used for prevention of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-07 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement psychotropic (mind altering medications often used to treat mood disorder, anxiety, or depression) medication side effect and behavior monitoring in one out of five sampled residents (Resident 80) when Resident 80's duloxetine (also known as Cymbalta mind altering medication used to treat depression) and cariprazine (also known as Vraylar, a mind-altering drug used to treat mood disorder) were not monitored based on manufacturer instructions and standards of practice. This failure could have contributed to unsafe medication use and contribute to lack of progress in Resident 80's mental health care. Findings: During a review of Resident 80's medical record titled, Order Summary Report dated 3/2024, the record indicated the following mind-altering medication orders: Cariprazine HCl Oral Capsule 1.5 MG [or Vraylar, MG is milligram a unit of measure]; Give 1 capsule by mouth one time a day related to ANXIETY .Start Date: 2/27/24. DULoxetine HCl Oral Capsule . 60 MG [or Cymbalta]; Give 1 capsule by mouth…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-03-08 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, and document review, the facility failed to store food in a sanitary manner when containers of left over food in the refrigerator were found not fully covered, undated, and unidentified. These failures placed residents at risk of being served spoiled, outdated food and/or contribute to foodborne illness. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 3/5/19, at 8:05 a.m., a walkthrough of the kitchen was conducted with the facility's cook. When the walk-in refrigerator was entered, a container of gravy, soup, and partly covered containers of prepared food were found to be undated and unidentified. When the cook was asked what the food was and how long it had been there, she said it was stewed pork with vegetables from yesterday. In a subsequent interview and review of the week's menu for the past 3 days, the facility's registered dietician (RD) verified, pork with vegetables was not found as a resident food item in the lunch or dinner menus. The cook was then asked further about the left over food; she declared the food had been…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-03-08 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement their infection prevention program for 5 residents (Resident 38, Resident 71, Resident 46, and 2 unknown residents) out of a census of 89 when: 1. Certified nurse assistant (CNA) 4 did not perform hand hygiene after contact with Resident 5 before she picked up Resident 71's plate and bowl and assisting Resident 38 with her meal; 2. CNA 6 did not perform hand hygiene after picking food up off the floor and before assisting two unknown residents out of the dining room; 3. Licensed nurse (LN) 8 and CNA 9 did not perform hand hygiene after contact with Resident 46. These failures placed Resident 38, Resident 71, Resident 46, and two unknown residents at risk for the spread of infection. Findings: 1. During a dining observation in the activity room on 3/5/19, at 12:20 p.m., CNA 4 assisted Resident 38 with her meal when Resident 5, who was seated at a different table, pounded his fist on the table, and yelled at Resident 71 who was trying to grab his (Resident 5's) dessert. CNA 4 got up, walked to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-03-08 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolatedKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure personal privacy for three of 27 sampled residents (Resident 25, Resident 46, and Resident 142) when the privacy curtain or window curtain was not pulled while personal care was being provided. This failure resulted in Resident 25, Residents 42, and Resident 142's privacy not being protected. Findings: a. Resident 142 was a long-term resident of the facility. During a concurrent interview and observation on 3/5/19, at 9:15 a.m., Resident 142 was observed lying in bed, naked, while certified nurse assistant (CNA) 1 provided incontinent care. Resident 142 resided in the B bed, next to the window. The privacy curtain between the A bed and B bed had been pulled, however, neither the privacy curtain on the other side of Resident 142's bed or the window curtain was pulled. While standing at the foot of Resident 142's bed, a car was observed driving past the unblocked window. CNA 1 stated she should have pulled the privacy curtain or pulled the window curtain. b. Resident 46 was admitted to the facility with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-03-08 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool) and the Joint Mobility Assessment accurately reflected one of 27 sampled resident's (Resident 33) condition. This failure had the potential for Resident 33 to receive inadequate care. Findings: Resident 33 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses which included Parkinson's disease (progressive nervous system disorder that affects movement). On 3/5/19, at 10:40 a.m., Resident 33 was observed in bed. Resident 33 had contractures (deformity and rigidity of joints) on both upper extremities and on her right lower extremity. Three splints were observed on Resident 33's wheelchair at the bedside. A review of an MDS and a joint mobility assessment dated [DATE] were not consistent. The MDS showed Section G (Functional Status assessment) G0400A Upper extremity (shoulder, elbow, wrist, hand) and Section G0400B Lower extremity (hip, knee, ankle, foot) were coded as 0, which indicated the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-03-08 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive smoking care plan (CSCP) for one of 27 sampled residents (Resident 53). This failure had the potential to not provide a plan for safe and person centered care for Resident 53. Findings: Resident 53 was admitted with diagnoses which included altered mental status. In an interview on 03/05/19, at 10:21 a.m., Resident 53 stated, he was admitted to the facility as a smoker. When asked how often he smoked a day, Resident 53 stated, I smoke four times a day by myself. During an observation on 3/6/19, at 4:30 p.m., Resident 53 was seen sitting in a wheelchair smoking in the facility designated smoking area. Review of Resident 53's clinical record showed no evidence that a CSCP was developed. In an interview and concurrent record review on 3/7/19, at 7:41 a.m., licensed nurse (LN) 6 confirmed Resident 53 was a smoker and a CSCP was not developed. LN 6 stated she could not find a CSCP in Resident 53's clinical records. LN 6 added the CSCP should have been developed to ensure Resident 53 was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-03-08 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide measures to prevent further decrease in joint mobility as ordered by the physician for one (Resident 33) of 27 sampled residents when splints were not applied per physician's order. This failure had the potential to place Resident 33 at risk to develop further decrease in range of motion. Findings: Resident 33 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses which included Parkinson's disease (progressive nervous system disorder that affects movement). On 3/5/19, at 10:40 a.m., Resident 33 was observed in bed without a splint or a brace on. Resident 33 had contractures (deformity and rigidity of joints) on both upper extremities and on her right lower extremity. Three splints were observed on Resident 33's wheelchair at the bedside. In a subsequent observation on 3/5/19, at 2:34 p.m., Resident 33 remained in bed without a splint on. In a concurrent interview and record review on 3/5/19, at 2:43 p.m., restorative nurse assistant (RNA) 1 explained she applies Resident 33's right knee and bilateral arm…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-03-08 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide an environment that is free from accident hazards for two of 27 sampled residents (Resident 46 and Resident 53) when: 1. Resident 46's care plan for padded siderails was not implemented. This failure had the potential for Resident 46 to sustain an injury during seizure activity. 2. Resident 53's Smoking Data Collection and Assessment (SDCA-an assessment tool) was not completed. The SDCA was used to determine the resident's ability to smoke safely. This failure had the potential for Resident 53 to receive inadequate supervision to smoke safely. Findings: 1. Resident 46 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses which included seizure disorder. Resident 46 used siderails in bed for bed mobility. On 3/7/19, at 9:15 a.m., Resident 46 was observed in bed with both siderails up and not padded. In a review of Resident 46's clinical record, a care plan for safety during seizure activity, dated 10/7/18, indicated Resident 46's siderails should be padded. In an interview with the director of staff development…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-03-08 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement aspiration (breathing in food or liquid into the airway) precautions for one (Resident 46) of 27 sampled residents when Resident 46's bed was flat during tube feeding (nutrition administered through a tube inserted through the abdomen). This failure placed Resident 46 at risk for aspiration pneumonia (inflammation or infection of the lungs caused by aspiration). Findings: Resident 46 was admitted to the facility with dysphagia (difficulty swallowing). Resident 46 received tube feeding via a tube feeding pump. On 3/5/19, at 10:05 a.m., Resident 46 was observed in bed with the tube feeding infusing via pump at 75 milliliters (ml, unit of measure) per hour. Resident 46's head of bed (HOB) was flat. Certified nurse assistant (CNA) 4 was at the bedside providing care to Resident 46. In a concurrent interview with CNA 4, CNA 4 stated she just put Resident 46's HOB down to provide care. When asked if Resident 46's tube feeding was on, CNA 4 replied, Yes. I put her [HOB] up right away when I'm done…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-03-08 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure qualified staff provided oxygen (O2) therapy for one (Resident 55) of 27 sampled residents when certified nurse assistant (CNA) 8 turned on Resident 55's O2 concentrator (device that concentrates the oxygen from the air). This failure placed Resident 55 at potential risk of receiving an incorrect amount of O2 which can lead to respiratory distress. Findings: Resident 55 was admitted with diagnoses which included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD - a lung disease that blocks airflow and makes it difficult to breathe). During a concurrent interview and observation on 3/5/19, at 11:15 a.m., Resident 55 was seen lying in bed wearing a nasal cannula (NC-a tubing or device that is placed in the nostrils to deliver supplemental oxygen). The NC was attached to the O2 concentrator next to Resident 55's bed. The O2 concentrator was noted to be off and the O2 indicator gauge was at a 0. When asked if she could feel the air from the O2 concentrator, Resident 55 stated, No. During a continuous observation…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-03-08 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and medication warning label review, the facility failed to safely store medications for one resident (Resident 68) out of a census of 89 when Calmoseptine ointment (skin ointment used to prevent and heal skin irritation) was found on top of Resident 68's bedside table. This failure had the potential for accidental ingestion of a harmful substance by a resident. Findings: On 3/5/19, at 9:49 a.m., two clear, plastic 30 milliliters (ml, unit of measure) cups with light pinkish ointment in them were observed on top of Resident 68's bedside table. In a concurrent observation and interview on 3/5/19, at 9:51 a.m., licensed nurse (LN) 6 went inside Resident 68's room, picked up the two plastic cups of ointment, and brought them outside the room. LN 6 said, I'm not sure what it is. In a concurrent observation and interview with the director of staff development (DSD) on 3/5/19, at 9:53 a.m., LN 6 showed the DSD the two cups of ointment. The DSD said, I'm not sure if it's ok to be at bedside. In an interview with LN 3 on 3/5/19, at 9:55 a.m., she looked at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2025-02-21 · tag F0912 — patternProvide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, four rooms (rooms 5, 18, 22, and 45) in the facility did not meet the required 80 square feet per resident. This failure placed the residents in rooms 5, 18, 22, and 45 at potential risk to impede their care and highest possible level of functioning due to smaller than required square footage. Findings: During an observation with the Maintenance Supervisor (MS), the following measurements were obtained for rooms 5, 18, 22, and 45. a. room [ROOM NUMBER], a 3-bed room, measured 237.37 square feet, rather than the required 240 square feet. b. room [ROOM NUMBER], a 3-bed room, measured 235.58 square feet, rather than the required 240 square feet. c. room [ROOM NUMBER], a 3-bed room, measured 233.21 square feet, rather than the required 240 square feet. d. room [ROOM NUMBER], a 2-bed room, measured 142.85 square feet, rather than the required 160 square feet. a. During a concurrent observation and interview with the MS, on 2/20/25, at 9:30 AM, the MS confirmed room [ROOM NUMBER]…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2024-03-07 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — widespreadConduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a review of the Facility Assessment (document containing information on the resident population, facility resources, and a community-based risk assessment), was conducted at least annually. This failure had the potential to negatively affect the health and well-being of all residents residing in the facility. Findings: A review of the Facility Assessment, provided by the facility, indicated the last time the Facility Assessment was reviewed and updated, was January 17, 2018. During a concurrent interview and record review with the Administrator (ADM) and Director of Nurses, (DON), on 3/7/24, at 11:05 AM, the ADM confirmed the last time the facility assessment had been updated was 1/17/18. The ADM explained the Facility Assessment should have been updated and reviewed at least annually. A review of the facility policy titled, Facility Assessment, undated, indicated, .It is the policy of this facility that it must conduct and document an individualized facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2024-03-07 · tag F0912 — patternProvide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, four rooms (rooms 5, 18, 22, and 45) in the facility did not meet the required 80 square feet per resident. This failure placed the residents in rooms 5, 18, 22, and 45 at potential risk to impede their care and highest possible level of functioning due to smaller than required square footage. Findings: During an observation with the Maintenance Director (MD), the following measurements were obtained for rooms [ROOM NUMBER]. An interview with the Administrator (ADM) confirmed the room size of room [ROOM NUMBER]. a. room [ROOM NUMBER], a 3-bed room, measured 236.73 square feet, rather than the required 240 square feet. b. room [ROOM NUMBER], a 3-bed room, measured 238 square feet, rather than the required 240 square feet; c. room [ROOM NUMBER] a 3-bed room, measured 231.2 square feet, rather than the required 240 square feet; and, d. room [ROOM NUMBER], a 2-bed room, measured 140 square feet, rather than the required 160 square feet. a. During a concurrent observation and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2019-03-08 · tag F0912 — patternProvide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and room dimension measurements obtained from the facility, rooms 5, 18, 22 and 45 measured less than 80 square feet per resident as required. This failure placed the residents in rooms 5, 18, 22, and 45 at potential risk to impede their care and highest possible level of functioning due to smaller than required square footage. Findings: On 3/7/19, room size measurements were obtained from the assistant administrator: a. room [ROOM NUMBER], a 3-bed room, measured 232.87 square feet, rather than the required 240 square feet; b. room [ROOM NUMBER] a 3-bed room, measured 231.2 square feet, rather than the required 240 square feet; c. room [ROOM NUMBER], a 3-bed room, measured 231.2 square feet, rather than the required 240 square feet; and d. room [ROOM NUMBER], a 2-bed room, measured 142.5 square feet, rather than the required 160 square feet. a. There were three residents in room [ROOM NUMBER] (Resident 59, Resident 25, and Resident 46). All three residents were dependent on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| STOCKTON EDISON HEALTHCARE CORPORATION | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 11/01/1981 |
| DEMESA, PRAXEDES | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 11/01/1981 |
| GALLARDE, MONITA | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 01/01/2001 |
| ZARILLA, DEBBIE | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 09/01/2008 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 8 rows in the source record cover these 4 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $535K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in CA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 055039. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-02-21, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.