The Hills Healthcare Center
10158 Sunland Blvd, Sunland, CA 91040 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 67 certified beds · (818) 353-7800 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home’s record is mixed — some reassuring signs, some worth asking about.
- a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- a high payroll-based staffing rating (5/5)
- lower-than-typical staff turnover (15% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0604, F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (44) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its payroll-based staffing score sits well above its independent inspection score
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 3 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 5 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 3 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's staffing rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the staffing score rests on the facility's own payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 3 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 2 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 3 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 3 to 4 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 19.9% | 10.2% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 4.0% | 4.0% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 1.6% | 0.8% | 0.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 4.0% | 1.2% | 2.0% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 0.0% | 7.3% | 6.5% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.4% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 1.6% | 1.6% | 3.3% | typical for the state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 8.5% | 9.8% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 21.6% | 13.7% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 98.2% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 6.9% | 4.3% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 1.7% | 10.2% | 21.2% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 24.3% | 12.0% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 8.8% | 1.5% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 91.3% | 93.2% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 19.5% | 23.0% | 22.6% | better |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 0.0% | 11.2% | 12.0% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 2.54 | 2.25 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 0.69 | 1.57 | 1.80 | better |
* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
36.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 77 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 37.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 69 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.38 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 64% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 35% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 36.7%CMS range 27.7–47.4 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | worse than U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.0%CMS range 7.0–13.8 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 37.7% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 44.9% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 42.0% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 97.6% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 100.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 7.3%CMS range 4.1–10.6 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.29 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 67 beds and averages 64.5 residents a day — about 96% occupied, or roughly 2 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.14 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.76 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.80 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.75 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.30 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.82 to 0.62 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 15% is below the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
44 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 34 are one tap away and print in full.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-12-18 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — widespreadProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to: 1. Replace two (2) open used medication emergency kits ([eKIT] - storage container for emergency use medications) within 72 hours of opening the kit on 2/13/2025, and one (1) open used medication eKIT within 72 hours of opening the kit on 2/13/2025, in two (2) of two (2) inspected Medication Rooms (Medication Room Station 1 and Medication Room Station 2.)2. Reconcile (the process of comparing transactions and activity to supporting documentation) two (2) medication eKITs containing Controlled Drugs ([CD]- medications which have a potential for abuse and may also lead to physical or psychological dependence) for December 2025, in two (2) of two (2) inspected Medication Rooms (Medication Room Station 1 and Medication Room Station 2.)3. Reconcile three (3) medication eKITs containing CDs for December 2025, in one (1) of two (2) inspected Medication Carts (Medication Cart Station 2.)As a result, control and accountability of CDs and availability of medications did not follow state and federal regulations and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-12-18 · tag F0700 — patternTry different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the safe and appropriate use of side rails (adjustable rigid plastic or metal bars attached to the bed that may be positioned in various locations on the bed; upper or lower, either or both sides) for two of three sampled residents (Residents 9 and 11) reviewed under restraints care area by failing to: 1. Ensure the facility conducted an accurate assessment of Resident 9's side rails and obtained an informed consent for the correct type of side rails, as the assessment and the informed consent did not reflect the type of side rails the resident was using. This failure had the potential to result in Resident 9 experiencing psychosocial harm and physical harm from entrapment (becoming caught between the rails and the mattress). 2. a. Ensure Resident 11's side rail assessments were completed for the correct length and number of side rails the resident was using. b. Ensure Resident 11's Side Rails Assessments form was not willfully falsified when it was altered to change the length and number of side rails…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-12-18 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — patternEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that its medication error rate was less than five (5) percent (%). Four (4) medication errors out of 24 total opportunities contributed to an overall medication error rate of 14.28% affecting two (2) of four (4) residents observed for medication administration (Resident 6 and 43.) The medication errors were as follows: 1. Resident 6 received ferrous sulfate (a supplement used to treat iron deficiency [having low amounts of iron in the blood] and anemia [a condition with lower-than-normal number of red blood cells,]) at a different time than ordered by Resident 6's physician. 2. Resident 43 received metoprolol (a medication used to for hypertension [HTN - a condition in which the blood vessels have persistently raised pressure,]) ferrous sulfate and aspirin (a medication used for cerebrovascular accidents ([CVA] - an interruption in the flow of blood to cells in the brain] prophylaxis [PPX - prevention,]) at a different time than…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-18 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to: 1. Monitor and record the medication room temperature on the temperature monitoring log for December 2025, for two (2) of two (2) inspected Medication Rooms (Medication Room Station 1 and Medication Room Station 2.) 2. Remove and discard from use two (2) expired Calcium with Vitamin D (medications used as supplements) medication bottles for facility use, in accordance with manufacturer's requirements and facility policy and procedures, in one (1) of two (2) inspected Medication Rooms (Medication Room Station 2.) These failures increased the potential for residents in the facility to receive medications that were ineffective or toxic due to the inadequate storage monitoring, and for residents to experience medication adverse consequences resulting in the negative impact to their health and well-being. Findings:During an observation and concurrent interview on 12/15/2025 at 11:10 a.m., with Registered Nurse (RN) 3, in Medication Room Station 1, the room temperature monitoring log for December 2025 was not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-12-18 · tag F0808 — failed to follow doctor-ordered diets — patternEnsure therapeutic diets are prescribed by the attending physician and may be delegated to a registered or licensed dietitian, to the extent allowed by State law.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Infection Preventionist (IP) checked the contents of a meal tray against diet ticket (slip of paper that indicates the specific meal being served to a resident based on their dietary restriction and preference, is placed by the enclosed plate on a tray) and physician's orders during lunch on 12/15/2025 for five (2, 14, 34, 43 and 45) of 63 residents who received food in the facility. This deficient practice had the potential for residents to not receive the correct prescribed diet, which could lead to health complications such as aspiration (the inhalation of foreign material such as food into the airways/lungs) and anaphylactic shock (severe, life-threatening allergic reaction that occurs rapidly after exposure to an allergen [such as certain foods, medications, or insect stings]).Findings:a. During a review of Resident 2's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the facility admitted the resident on 10/25/2024, with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-18 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — patternSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure accurate medical records were maintained for two of 18 sampled residents (Residents 11 and 13) when:1. Resident 11's Side Rail Assessments form was altered without any indication of the date, time, or author.This failure resulted in the willful falsification of documentation related to Resident 11's side rails (adjustable rigid plastic or metal bars attached to the bed that may be positioned in various locations on the bed; upper or lower, either or both sides). 2. Resident 13's list of medical diagnoses was incomplete and did not reflect all current diagnoses. The failure resulted in not providing an accurate clinical overview of Resident 13's health status, which could have resulted in issues related to resident safety, quality of care and continuity of care. Findings: 1.During a review of Resident 11's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the facility originally admitted Resident 11 to the facility on 5/30/2018 and readmitted the resident on 6/6/2025 with diagnoses including, but not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-18 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolatedEnsure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents were treated with respect and dignity including the right to be free from physical restraints (any manual method, physical or mechanical device, material or equipment that is attached or adjacent to the resident's body that he or she cannot easily remove that restricts freedom of movement or normal access to one's body) for one out of three sampled residents (Residents 5) investigated during review of physical restraints care area by failing to obtain a physician's order and informed consent and develop and implement a care plan on the use of a gait belt fastened around Resident 5's waist and the wheelchair. These deficient practices had the potential to result in the restriction of Resident 5's freedom of movement, a decline in physical functioning, psychosocial harm, physical harm from entrapment (sliding down and getting caught between the belt and the wheelchair).Findings: During a review of Resident 5's admission…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-18 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to conduct an accurate Minimum Data Set (MDS - a standardized assessment and care screening tool) assessments for one (Resident 13) of five sampled residents by failing to ensure Resident 13's MDS reflect the resident's all current diagnoses. The failure resulted in not providing an accurate clinical overview of Resident 13's health status, which could have resulted in issues related to resident safety, quality of care and continuity of care.Findings: During a review of Resident 13's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident 13 on 8/5/2023 with diagnoses including encephalopathy (a disease in which the functioning of the brain is affected by some agent or condition), muscle wasting and atrophy (loss of muscle tissue, mass, and strength), schizoaffective disorder (a mental illness that can affect thoughts, mood, and behavior), dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities), and depression (a serious mood disorder causing persistent sadness, hopelessness, and loss of interest…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-18 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents who were incontinent (lacks voluntary control over urination) of bladder (organ in the pelvis that stores urine) received appropriate treatment and services to prevent urinary tract infections (UTI, common infections that happen when bacteria infect the urinary tract) by failing to ensure the urinary catheter (a thin flexible tube that is inserted into the bladder to help drain urine) collection bag tubing was not looped or coiled to allow the urine to flow freely into the collection bag for one of two residents (Resident 62) reviewed under the urinary catheter care area.This failure had the potential to result in the backflow of urine into the resident's bladders, which can cause urinary tract infections (UTI- an infection in the bladder/urinary tract). Findings: During a review of Resident 62's admission Record, the admission Record indicated, the facility initially admitted Resident 62 to the facility on 4/3/2024 and readmitted the resident on 12/14/2025 with diagnoses including metabolic…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-18 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to implement appropriate infection control practices for two of 18 sampled residents (Resident 12 and Resident 18) by failing to: a. Ensure Resident 12's foam bed rail padding could be properly cleaned and disinfected. This failure had the potential to result in Resident 12 to come into contact with infectious pathogens (a biological agent, like a virus, bacterium, fungus, or parasite, that can cause illness) and acquire an infection due to lack of adequate disinfection of the surrounding environment. b. Ensure intravenous access (IV, a medical technique that administers fluids and medications directly into a person's vein) dressing was labeled with the insertion date. This failure placed Resident 60 at risk for developing complications such as inflammation of the vein and bloodstream infections because without a date staff may not be able to track how long the IV has been in.Findings: a. During a review of Resident 12's admission Record, the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 34 citations
- Potential for harm · E2024-10-24 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — patternHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide dignity and respect for two out of two sampled residents (Resident 18 and 49) when: 1. Restorative Nursing Assistant 1 (RNA 1, a staff who is trained in activities to help residents with limited mobility and abilities) was observed standing over Resident 49 while assisting Resident 49 with eating. 2. Certified Nursing Assistant 3 (CNA 3, a staff who is trained in providing basic, hands-on patient care) was observed standing over Resident 18 while assisting Resident 18 with eating. These failures had the potential to negatively affect Resident 49's and Resident 18's self-esteem and self-worth during mealtimes in the facility. Findings: 1. During a review of Resident 49's admission record indicated the facility admitted the resident on 2/28/2024, including a readmission on [DATE], with diagnoses that included dysphagia (difficulty swallowing) and dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities). During a review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-10-24 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — patternReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident call light (an alerting device for nurses or other nursing personnel to assist a resident when in need) was within accessible reach of the resident from for two of two sampled residents (Resident 23 and Resident 59) in the facility. This failure had the potential for residents in the facility to be unable to summon facility staff for help, as needed, which could have resulted in resident discomfort and/or harm due to the residents' inability to reliably call facility staff for help. Findings: 1. During a review of Resident 23's admission Record, the document indicated the facility admitted Resident 23 on 5/24/2022, including a readmission on [DATE], with diagnoses that included spinal stenosis (a narrowing of one or more spaces within your spinal canal), displaced fracture of left femur (fracture requiring realignment [putting back into its normal position] of the bone), and aphasia (a condition that makes it hard for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-10-24 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — patternProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure licensed nurses provided non-pharmacological interventions prior to administering an as needed (prn) opioid medication on multiple days for two of two sampled residents (Resident 36 and Resident 61). These failures had the potential to result in Resident 36 and Resident 61 receiving unnecessary pain medications. Findings: 1. During a review of Resident 36's Face Sheet (admission record), the document indicated Resident 36 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included pelvic fracture. During a review of Resident 36's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a federally mandated resident assessment tool), dated 8/26/2024, the MDS indicated Resident 36 was severely impaired in cognition (the process of acquiring knowledge and understanding through thought, experience, and the senses) with skills required for daily decision making. The MDS indicated Resident 36 required moderate assistance (helper does less than half…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-24 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure two of eight sampled residents were free from medication error by failing to ensure the Controlled Drug Record (CDR - accountability record of medications that are considered to have a strong potential for abuse) coincided with the Medication Administration Records (MAR - a report detailing the drugs administered to a patient by the licensed nurses) for two (Resident 36 & Resident 61) of four residents sampled during the medication storage observation. These failures had the potential to result in medication error and/or drug diversion (illegal distribution or abuse of prescription drug) in the facility. Findings: 1. During a review of Resident 36's Face Sheet (admission record), the document indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included pelvic fracture. During a review of Resident 36's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a federally mandated resident assessment tool), dated 8/26/2024,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-10-24 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — patternEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the implementation of the Medication Regimen Review (MRR - a pharmacist's thorough evaluation of a resident's medication routine and recommendations) for two of three residents (Resident 49 and Resident 63). This failure could have resulted in preventable medication side effects, including up to bleeding, blood clotting, or seizures for Resident 49 and Resident 63. Findings: 1. During a review of Resident 49's admission Record, dated 11/24/2024, the document indicated Resident 49 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included hydrocephalus (an abnormal buildup of cerebrospinal fluid [CSF- a clear, colorless, watery fluid that flows in and around your brain and spinal cord] deep within the brain), presence of cerebrospinal drainage device (shunt - a passage, such as a tube that is made to allow blood or other fluid to move from one part of the body to another), dysphagia (swallowing difficulties), history of falling, and dementia (the loss…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-10-24 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — patternEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents' drug regimens were free from unnecessary drugs, by failing to adequately monitor valproic acid and heparin for two of three residents (Resident 49 and Resident 63). This failure could have resulted in medication side effects leading up to bleeding, blood clotting, or seizures for Resident 49 and Resident 63. Findings: 1. During a review of Resident 49's admission Record, dated 11/24/2024, the document indicated Resident 49 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included hydrocephalus (an abnormal buildup of cerebrospinal fluid [CSF- a clear, colorless, watery fluid that flows in and around your brain and spinal cord] deep within the brain), presence of cerebrospinal drainage device (shunt - a passage, such as a tube that is made to allow blood or other fluid to move from one part of the body to another), dysphagia (swallowing difficulties), history of falling, and dementia (the loss of remembering and reasoning to the extent that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-24 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — patternEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free of any significant medication errors, when the facility continued to give medications without checking the therapeutic levels for two of three sampled residents (Residents 49 and Resident 63). This failure had the potential to result in bleeding, blood clots, or seizures for Resident 49 and Resident 63. Findings: 1. During a review of Resident 49's admission Record, dated 11/24/2024, the document indicated Resident 49 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included hydrocephalus (an abnormal buildup of cerebrospinal fluid [CSF- a clear, colorless, watery fluid that flows in and around your brain and spinal cord] deep within the brain), presence of cerebrospinal drainage device (shunt - a passage, such as a tube that is made to allow blood or other fluid to move from one part of the body to another), dysphagia (swallowing difficulties), history of falling, and dementia (the loss of remembering and reasoning to the extent…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-24 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the storage of food in accordance with professional standards by not labeling stored food with a use-by date (the indicated date that the food item should be used or consumed by). These failures had the potential for 66 of 67 facility residents who receive food from the facility kitchen to be at risk for food borne illness (illness caused by food contamination with bacteria, viruses, parasites, or toxins). Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 10/21/2024 at 8:00 a.m. with the Dietary Supervisor (DS), the refrigerator was observed and the following was noted: one clear zip-lock bag of garlic, one clear plastic container of ham, and one clear plastic container of apple sauce - none of these items were labeled with a use-by date. Further observation included the dry storage room and the following was noted: seven pistachio puddings and pie fillings, six vanilla pudding and pie fillings, five lime gelatine desserts, three cherry gelatine desserts, four strawberry gelatine desserts,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-10-24 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — patternDispose of garbage and refuse properly.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure their trash was stored in the dumpster areas while being maintained in a sanitary manner. Two of two facility garbage dumpsters in use had their lids open. These failures had the potential for harborage and feeding of pests. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 10/23/2024 at 12:07 PM with the Dietary Supervisor (DS), there were two facility dumpsters observed outside of the facility that were filled with trash bags. Two dumpsters had the lids open and positioned in close proximity to the wall, making it impossible to close them. The DS stated, the dumpsters should have been closed. The DS further stated, if the dumpsters were not closed, the smell would attract flies and there could be an infection control issue, because the flies could get inside the facility and go into the resident's food. During an interview on 10/23/2024 at 12:15 PM with the Maintenance Supervisor (MS), the MS stated the dumpster lids should have been closed. The MS further stated, if the dumpster lids were…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-24 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the implementation of their policy titled, Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP - an infection control method that uses targeted gown and gloves to reduce the spread of multidrug-resistant organisms [MDROs - microorganisms, mainly bacteria, that are resistant to one or more classes of antimicrobial [a substance that kills microorganisms such as bacteria or mold, or stops them from growing and causing disease agents]]) when: 1. Licensed Vocational Nurse 2 (LVN 2) did not don (to put on) a gown while administering medication via gastrostomy (G-Tube, a tube inserted through the abdomen that delivers directly to the stomach) for one of one sampled resident (Resident 48). 2. Licensed Vocational Nurse 1 ( LVN 1) did not don a gown while administering medication through the rectum (the last part of the large intestine, where the body stores stool before it leaves through the anus [an opening at the end of the digestive system]) for one of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-24 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the residents' clinical records were updated regarding advance directives (written statement of a person's wishes regarding medical treatment made to ensure those wishes are carried out should the person be unable to communicate them to a doctor) for one of three sampled residents (Resident 59), by failing to maintain a current copy of the resident's advance directives in Resident 59's active clinical record. This failure had the potential to cause conflict with Resident 59's wishes regarding health care services received. Findings: During a review of Resident 59's admission Record, the document indicated Resident 59 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with a readmission on [DATE], with diagnoses that included senile degeneration of the brain (a process of gradual decline of brain cells that is associated with memory loss and difficulty thinking clearly), aphasia (a condition that makes it hard for a person to speak, understand, read or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-24 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the activation of the correct setting of a Low Air Loss Mattress (LALM - a pressure-relieving mattress used to prevent and treat pressure injuries) for one of one sampled residents (Resident 59) requiring a LALM, when Resident 59 was investigated for pressure injury (PI - localized damage to the skin and/or underlying soft tissue usually over a bony prominence or related to a medical or other device) care. This failure had the potential to place Resident 59 at risk for discomfort and development of avoidable pressure ulcers/injuries. Findings: During a review of Resident 59's admission Record, the document indicated Resident 59 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with a readmission on [DATE], with diagnoses that included senile degeneration of the brain (a process of gradual decline of brain cells that is associated with memory loss and difficulty thinking clearly), aphasia (a condition that makes it hard for a person to speak,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-24 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were stored in a locked compartment, when the Station Two Nursing Station Medication Cabinet did not have a lock, which permitted any staff or resident access. This failure had the potential for residents to take medications, which could cause harmful adverse side effects for the residents. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 10/21/2024 at 4:00 p.m. with the Director of Staff Development (DSD), in the facility's medication storage area, observed Nursing Station Two right-side drug cabinet. The cabinet did not have a lock as the left-side cabinet had. The right-side cabinet contained the following: 1. Two Iron Supplement (given to one with a low level of iron in the blood) Liquid 16 fluid ounce (fl. oz., a unit of measure for liquids) bottles. 2. Two Bismuth subsalicylate (commonly known as Pepto Bismol, given for treating diarrhea and upset stomach) 16 fl. oz. bottles. 3. One Liquid Multi-Vitamin 16 fl. oz. bottle. 4. Three Liquid Acetaminophen (also known as Tylenol,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-05-22 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide the necessary care and services in accordance with its policy and procedure for one of three sample residents (Resident 1), as evidenced by: 1. Failing to schedule an appointment for follow up care with cardiology (branch of medicine that specializes in diagnosing and treating diseases of the heart and blood vessels) within two weeks (per instructions from the General Acute Care Hospital [GACH]) after being re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] and within one week (per instructions from the GACH) after being re-admitted to the facility on [DATE]. 2. Failing to schedule an appointment for follow up care with pulmonology (branch of medicine dealing with diseases involving the respiratory tract [the organs that are involved in breathing]) within one week (per instructions from the GACH) after being re-admitted to the facility on [DATE]. 3. Failing to ensure monitoring was provided to Resident 1 after a change in condition (COC- when there is a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-22 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive person-centered care plan (a plan for an individual's specific health needs and desired health outcomes) to address a diagnosis of heart failure (a condition in which the heart doesn't pump blood as well as it should) for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1). This deficient practice had the potential to negatively affect the delivery of care and services to Resident 1 due to the absence of the comprehensive care plan. Findings: A review of Resident 1's admission Record indicated the facility originally admitted Resident 1 on 10/19/2023 and readmitted Resident 1 on 10/28/2023. Resident 1's last re-admission was on 12/20/2023 with diagnoses that included Non-ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction (NSTEMI- a type of heart attack that usually happens when your heart's need for oxygen can't be met), heart failure, and unstable angina (chest discomfort or pain caused by insufficient blood and oxygen flow to the heart). A review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS- a standardized assessment and care…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-22 · tag F0711 — isolatedEnsure the resident's doctor reviews the resident's care, writes, signs and dates progress notes and orders, at each required visit.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the history and physical (H&P- is the starting point of the resident health concerns that explain why a resident sought medical attention or why a resident is now receiving medical attention) for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) was completed by the attending physician upon Resident 1 ' s first admission to the facility on [DATE]. This deficient practice had the potential for inconsistent care coordination due to incomplete records. Findings: A review of Resident 1's admission Record indicated the facility originally admitted Resident 1 on 10/19/2023 and readmitted Resident 1 on 10/28/2023. Resident 1 ' s last re-admission was on 12/20/2023 with diagnoses that included Non-ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction (NSTEMI- a type of heart attack that usually happens when your heart's need for oxygen can't be met), heart failure (a condition in which the heart doesn ' t pump blood as well as it should), and unstable angina (chest discomfort…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-22 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement their facility ' s medication administration policy by failing to ensure Licensed Vocational Nurse 1 (LVN 1) signed and documented on the Medication Administration Record (MAR- a report detailing the medications administered to a resident by a healthcare professional) for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) when LVN 1 did not administer Plavix (a medication used to prevent stroke and blood clots) on 12/21/2023. This deficient practice had the potential to result in medication errors and had the potential to result in confusion on the delivery of care and services. Findings: A review of Resident 1's admission Record indicated the facility originally admitted Resident 1 on 10/19/2023 and readmitted Resident 1 on 10/28/2023. Resident 1 ' s last re-admission was on 12/20/2023 with diagnoses that included Non-ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction (NSTEMI- a type of heart attack that usually happens when your heart's need for oxygen can't be met), heart failure (a condition in which the heart doesn ' t pump blood…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-14 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement policies and procedures for ensuring the reporting of a reasonable suspicion of a crime in accordance with section 1150B of the Act by failing to report within two (2) hours to the State Survey Agency (SSA) one incident of injury of unknown origin (injuries resulting without knowing how it happened) that occurred on 3/6/2024 for one of four sampled residents (Resident 1). This deficient practice resulted in a delay of an onsite inspection by the SSA to ensure the safety of the other residents and had the potential to result in unidentified abuse. Findings: A review of Resident 1's admission Record indicated the facility originally admitted the resident on 1/23/2024 and readmitted the resident on 3/8/2024 with diagnoses that included age-related osteoporosis (a disease in which bones become fragile and more likely to break) with pathological fracture (a broken bone caused by a disease rather than an injury), and unspecified dementia (the loss of cognitive functioning, thinking, remembering, and reasoning). A…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-14 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — patternEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure licensed nurses administered the prescribed dose of Clozaril (an Antipsychotic medication [medications that are used for some types of mental distress or disorder] to treat schizophrenia [a serious mental illness that affects how a person thinks, feels, and behaves]) 200 milligrams (mg-unit of measure) to one of nine sampled residents (Resident 1) from 11/23/2023 to 1/29/2024. Resident 1 was administered a total of 31 incorrect (higher than prescribed) doses of Clozaril. The deficient practice of failing to administer medications in accordance with physician's orders placed Resident 1 at risk for serious health complications as a result of being administered a higher dose of Clozaril than prescribed. Findings: A review of Resident 1 ' s Face Sheet (admission record) indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included schizophrenia. A review of Resident 1' s Minimum Data Set (MDS, a standardized assessment…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-11-02 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide an environment free from accidents and hazards by failing to: 1. Ensure that a resident who was at high risk for falls had their bed in a low position for one (Resident 44) of five sampled residents investigated for accidents. 2. Ensure the information for a resident's pacemaker (a small electrical device that's implanted in the chest or abdomen to help your heartbeat at a normal rate and rhythm) was readily available in the resident's medical record for one (Resident 9) of five sampled residents investigated for accidents. 3. Ensure that a licensed nurse did not leave a resident's blood pressure medication at the bedside for one (Resident 13) of five sampled residents investigated for accidents. 4. Ensure one of five sampled residents (Resident 56) investigated for Accidents did not have an opened bottle of 0.9 percent (%-unit of measure) Sodium Chloride Irrigation solution (Normal Saline [NS], a sterile solution composed of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-02 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to: 1. Ensure licensed nurses followed up with the pharmacy when a resident's Isosorbide (a medication used to prevent angina [chest pain] in residents with a certain heart condition) medication had not been delivered for one (Resident 112) out of six sampled residents observed during medication administration. 2. Ensure licensed nurse staff documented either at the start of the shift, or the end of the shift on Medication Cart 2 Floor Narcotic (a type of medication that is used to relieve pain but has a high potential for abuse) Release form (a form that is signed by both the oncoming shift licensed nurse and the outgoing shift licensed nurse after they have both verified by counting that all controlled medications [medications that can cause physical and mental dependence such as narcotics]) for 12 of 127 shifts. 3. Ensure licensed nurses documented the administration of Ativan (a medication used to treat anxiety [a persistent feeling of worry, nervousness, or unease]) for one of five sampled resident's (Resident 38) for 15…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-02 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to: 1. Ensure medication bubble packs (packaging in which medications are organized and sealed between a cardboard backing and clear plastic cover) were not stored in an unlocked drawer in Nursing Station 2 for two of two sampled residents (Resident 26 and Resident 34) investigated for Medication Storage and Labeling. 2. Label one open vial (small container) of glucometer test strips (an absorbent strip that soaks up blood to be read by the glucometer [medical device used for determining the approximate concentration of sugar in the blood]) found in one of two medication carts (Nursing Station 2 Medication Cart) investigated during the facility task Medication Storage and Labeling. These deficient practices had the potential to result in residents or unauthorized personnel accessing Resident 26 and Resident 34's medications and had the potential to compromise the accuracy of glucometer tests strips readings resulting in inaccurate blood…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-02 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the kitchen staff failed to ensure the proper storage, preparation, and distribution of food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for 60 of 61 residents who receive food from the kitchen by: 1. Failing to ensure food items such as ham, cups of wild berry frozen desserts, lemons, apples, cheese, yogurt, and milk were labeled and dated with the received and/or open date (when staff write on the item the date it was received or the date it was first opened). 2. Failing to ensure the Meat Freezer temperature was maintained below 0 degrees Fahrenheit (?, a unit of measurement) for 16 of 31 logged temperature checks for 10/2023. 3. Failing to ensure the low temperature dishwashing machine (a device that applies water and a chemical sanitizing solution [destroys or prevents the growth of disease-causing microorganisms] to the surfaces of dishes and equipment) chlorine (a sanitizing solution) solution concentration (the amount of chemical dissolved in water) measured a minimum of 50 parts per million (ppm- a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-02 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement infection control practices by: 1. Failing to ensure a resident's oxygen tubing (connects to an oxygen source to deliver oxygen to a resident) was labeled with the date it was last changed and was kept off the floor for one (Resident 110) of five sampled residents investigated for infection control. 2. Failing to ensure that, the wound treatment nurse (Licensed Vocational Nurse 1 [LVN 1]), who was observed wearing two sets of gloves on at the same time, performed hand hygiene (washing of hands) when removing one set of gloves during a wound care dressing (sterile [free from germs] pad applied to a wound to promote healing and protect the wound from infection) change observation for two (Residents 47 and Resident 16) of five sampled residents investigated for infection control. 3. Failing to ensure that during a medication administration observation, Licensed Vocational Nurse 2 (LVN 2) performed hand hygiene before and after administering…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-02 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolatedEnsure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure it followed its policy and procedure for the implementation of the physical restraint (the use of a manual hold or device to restrict freedom of movement of all or part of a resident's body) of a soft belt (a foam-padded pelvic restraint with ties secured around the back of wheelchair designed to help prevent forward sliding in wheelchairs) for one of one sampled resident investigated for restraints (Resident 38) by failing to: 1. Ensure informed consent (the process in which a health care provider educates a resident about the risks, benefits, and alternatives of a given procedure or intervention and ensures that a decision is made voluntarily) was obtained by the physician for Resident 38's soft belt restraint. 2. Ensure a pre-restraint assessment was completed prior to placing the soft belt on the resident on 9/8/2023. 3. Ensure the physician's order for the soft belt included the specific reason for the restraint, how the restraint will benefit the resident's medical symptom, and the period of time…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-02 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive person-centered care plan (a plan for an individual's specific health needs and desired health outcomes) for two of 17 sampled residents (Resident 9 and Resident 38) by failing to: 1. Ensure a care plan for oxygen therapy (a treatment that provides extra oxygen to help people with lung diseases or breathing problems) was developed for Resident 9. 2. Ensure a care plan for Resident 9's pacemaker (a small electrical device that's implanted in the chest or abdomen to help your heartbeat at a normal rate and rhythm) was developed. 3. Ensure a care plan for the use of a soft belt restraint (a foam-padded pelvic restraint with ties secured around the back of wheelchair designed to help prevent forward sliding in wheelchairs) was developed for Resident 38. These deficient practices had the potential to result in a delay in or lack of delivery of care and services. Findings: 1. A review of Resident 9's admission Record…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-02 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident receiving oxygen had a physician's order for oxygen therapy (a treatment that provides extra oxygen to help people with lung diseases or breathing problems) for one of one sampled resident (Resident 9) investigated for oxygen therapy. This deficient practice had the potential to result in Resident 9 experiencing adverse effects due to inadequate or higher than necessary rates of oxygen administration leading to a negative impact to the resident's overall health. Findings: A review of Resident 9's admission Record indicated the facility originally admitted Resident 9 on 4/7/2023 and readmitted Resident 9 on 7/14/2023 with diagnoses that included pneumonia (an infection that inflames the air sacs in one or both lungs) and paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (occurs when a rapid, erratic heart rate begins suddenly and then stops on its own within seven days). A review of Resident 9's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a standardized assessment and care screening tool), dated 7/20/2023, indicated Resident 9 had…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-02 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of five sampled residents (Resident 38) was free from unnecessary psychotropic medication (medications capable of affecting the mind, emotions, and behavior) by failing to limit the duration of an as needed (PRN) order for Ativan (a controlled substance [medication with a high potential for abuse] used to treat anxiety [intense, excessive, and persistent worry and fear about everyday situations]) to 14 days. This deficient practice had the potential to result in adverse reaction or impairment in the resident's mental or physical condition. Findings: A review of Resident 38's admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident 38 on 1/26/2023 with diagnoses that included Parkinson's disease (a brain disorder that causes unintended or uncontrollable movements, such as shaking, stiffness, and difficulty with balance and coordination ) and neurocognitive disorder with Lewy Bodies (a form of progressive dementia [the loss of cognitive functioning ; thinking, remembering, and reasoning ; to such an extent that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-02 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident received his Isosorbide (a medication used for high blood pressure that works by dilating [widens] blood vessels) medication for 12 days as ordered by the physician for one (Resident 112) of six sampled residents observed during medication administration. This deficient practice had the potential to place Resident 112 at increased risk of experiencing adverse effects, such as uncontrolled blood pressure, from not receiving his blood pressure medication. Findings: A review of Resident 112's admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident 112 on 10/19/2023 with diagnoses that included hypertension (HTN - high blood pressure) and atrial fibrillation (a type of arrhythmia, or abnormal heart rhythm, that causes the heart to beat irregularly). A review of Resident 112's physician orders dated 10/19/2023, indicated an order to administer Isosorbide 240 milligrams (mg- unit of measure) by mouth (PO) daily for HTN. On 11/1/2023 at 2:26 p.m., during a concurrent observation and interview, observed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-02 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain complete and accurate medical records for two of six sampled residents (Resident 112 and Resident 14) by: 1. Failing to ensure licensed nurses did not sign on the Medication Administration Record (MAR - a report detailing the drugs administered to a patient by a healthcare professional) when a resident's Isosorbide (used for the management of angina [chest pain]) medication was not available during medication administration observation. 2. Failing to ensure a licensed nurse did not sign on the MAR when a resident's Apixaban (medication that helps to prevent blood clots) was not available during medication administration observation. These deficient practices resulted in Resident 112 and Resident 14's medical records being inaccurate and not in accordance with professional standards of practice; and had the potential to result in confusion regarding Resident 112 and Resident 14's condition and what care and services were provided to Resident 112 and Resident 14. Findings: 1. A review of Resident 112's admission…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-01 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — patternTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and or implement policies and procedures for ensuring the reporting of a reasonable suspicion of a crime in accordance with section 1150B of the Act by failing to report to the State Survey Agency (SSA, the Department) two incidents of injuries of unknown origin (injuries resulting without knowing how it happened), which occurred on 3/5/2023 and 7/22/2023 for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1). These deficient practices resulted in a delay of an onsite inspection by the SSA to ensure the safety of the other residents and had the potential to result in unidentified abuse. Findings: 1. A review of Resident 1 ' s admission Record, dated 10/27/2023, indicated the resident was originally admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses hemiplegia (a condition that causes inability to move half of the body) and hemiparesis (weakness of one entire side of the body) following cerebral infarction (area of dead tissue in the brain…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2025-12-18 · tag F0912 — patternProvide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to meet the requirement of 80 square feet (sq. ft., a unit of measure) per resident in multiple resident bedrooms for 27 of 28 resident rooms (room [ROOM NUMBER], 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 21, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, and 30). This deficient practice had the potential to result in inadequate space for safe nursing care and privacy for the residents.Findings:On 12/18/2025, the Administrator (ADM) submitted the Client Accommodation Analysis Form (a form designed to provide a record of resident accommodations approved for licensed care) and the facility letter requesting for continuation of its room size waiver.During a review of the Client Accommodation Analysis submitted by the Administrator on 12/18/2025, the analysis sheet indicated the rooms and space measurements were as follows: Room No. Room Size (SF: Square Feet) Beds SF per resident1 148.05 2 74 2 154.63 2 77.33 154.63 2 77.34 151.34 2 75.65 145.81…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2024-10-24 · tag F0912 — patternProvide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY F912 Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to meet the requirement of 80 square feet (SF, a unit of measure) per resident in multiple resident bedrooms for 15 of 28 resident rooms (room [ROOM NUMBER], 2, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, and 21). This deficient practice had the potential to result in inadequate space for safe nursing care and privacy for the residents. Findings: On 10/21/2024, the Administrator (ADM) submitted the Client Accommodation Analysis Form (a form designed to provide a record of resident accommodations approved for licensed care) and the facility letter requesting for continuation of its room size waiver. A review of the Client Accommodation Analysis Form, dated 10/21/2024, it indicated the Administrator submitted the form with the rooms and space measurements as follows: Room No. Room Size (SF: Square Feet) Beds SF per resident 1 156 2 78 2 156 2 78 7 228 3 76 8 228 3 76 9 228 3 76 10 228 3 76 11 228 3 76 12 228 3 76 14 228 3 76 15 228 3 76…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2023-11-02 · tag F0912 — patternProvide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed ensure that 15 of 28 resident rooms met the square footage requirement of 80 square feet (sq. ft. - unit of measure) per resident. This deficient practice had the potential to result in inadequate space to provide safe nursing care and privacy for the resident. Findings: On 10/30/2023, the Administrator (ADM) submitted the Client Accommodation Analysis Form (a form designed to provide a record of resident accommodations approved for licensed care) and the facility letter requesting for continuation of its room waiver. A review of the Client Accommodation Analysis Form indicated that 15 of 28 resident rooms did not have at least 80 square feet per resident. The Room Waiver Request Form and Client Accommodation Analysis Form indicated the following: Room No. Square Footage Bed Capacity Sq. Ft. per Resident 1 156 2 (two) 78 2 156 2 (two) 78 7 228 3 (three) 76 8 228 3 (three) 76 9 228 3 (three) 76 10 228 3 (three) 76 11 228 3 (three) 76 12 228 3 (three) 76 14 228 3 (three) 76 15 228 3 (three) 76 16 228 3 (three) 76…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SUNLAND INVESTMENTS, LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 06/01/2019 |
| BERGER, RUTH | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 50% | since 06/01/2019 |
| BERGER, STEVEN | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 50% | since 06/01/2019 |
| BANAFSHEHA, RABIE | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY | — | since 06/01/2019 |
| CITRUS ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES, INC. | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/01/2015 |
| AGESYAN, ANI | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 06/22/2022 |
| BOGIKIAN, AZAT | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 06/03/2019 |
| CAMPOS, ROSARIO | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 06/01/2019 |
| CORTEZ, RONALD | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 06/07/2022 |
| GHAZARIAN, MARIANNA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 06/06/2017 |
| SAHAKYAN, NAREK | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 07/01/2017 |
| SH HEALTHCARE PROPERTY, LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 07/01/2007 |
| SHADOW HILLS SUBLANDLORD, LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 09/15/2025 |
| CLARIZIO, DINO | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 07/01/2007 |
| CLARIZIO, MICHAEL | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 07/01/2007 |
| CLARIZIO, ORLANDO | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 07/01/2007 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 23 rows in the source record cover these 16 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 77% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $180K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in CA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 555045. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-12-18, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.