No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Idylwood Care Center

1002 W. Fremont Avenue, Sunnyvale, CA 94087 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 185 certified beds · (408) 739-2383 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (408) 739-2383 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
No harm-level citations or fines — but 30 lower-level deficiencies on record (see below)
Insights

On the public record, this home looks stronger than most — but visit before you decide.

In its favor
  • a strong health-inspection score (4/5) — the hardest rating to game (though it’s ranked within its own state, not nationally)
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (5/5)
  • lower-than-typical staff turnover (31% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
Worth asking about
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (30) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

5/5
CMS overall
5 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 4 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 5 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 3 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
1195 W Fremont Ave · (408) 426-5590 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
Walgreens0.5 mi
1306 S Mary Ave · (408) 732-2729 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
1356 S Mary Ave · (408) 212-4928 · Call to confirm hours
Park
1026 Astoria Dr · (408) 730-7751 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 3 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 3 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 5 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating5★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased13.8%10.2%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight4.9%4.0%5.4%typical
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.7%0.8%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection1.2%1.2%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms0.0%7.3%6.5%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.4%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury2.4%1.6%3.3%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened19.8%9.8%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication7.3%13.7%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine95.5%98.2%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers2.3%4.3%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control11.1%10.2%21.2%typical for the state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table24.2%12.0%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission19.1%23.0%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit13.6%11.2%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.942.251.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days3.191.571.80worse

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

0.07U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.02hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.04hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
<0.01hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.07 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 3% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 5% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNFnot reported — The data for this measure is missing or was not submitted. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identifiednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — Newly certified nursing home with less than 12-15 months of data available or the nursing home opened less than 6 months ago, and there were no data to submit or claims for this measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF staynot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsenednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFsnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.66
RN hours/ resident / day
1.43
LPN hours/ resident / day
3.98
Aide hours/ resident / day
6.07
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.42
RN hoursweekends
30.9%
Total nursing turnover
36.4%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 185 beds and averages 145.0 residents a day — about 78% occupied, or roughly 40 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 6.07 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.66 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.98 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 5.17 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 6.43 on weekdays — 20% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.76 to 0.42 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 31% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

11
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-04-11)
3
at the previous standard inspection (2023-12-13)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

30 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 20 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · D2026-07-01 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, the facility failed to follow its fall policy and procedure, FALL PREVENTION & MANAGEMENT, when staff did not assess, report, and document a fall for one out of three residents (Resident 1) when Resident 1 consistently reported falling and that staff helped her back to bed approximately a week ago; however, the reported fall was not handled according to the facility fall policy for assessment, documentation, post fall monitoring, and physician notification. Subsequent medical evaluation results identified injury the right great toe. This deficient practice left Resident 1 without timely interventions for her fall injuries, which was a change of condition, by the facility.Findings: Review of a facility self-report, dated 6/12/26, indicated, On 6/10/26 during AM shift, Resident 1 had a change in condition of swelling with skin discoloration on the left foot and skin discoloration on the right foot. When the charge nurse asked Resident 1 what happened, Resident 1…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-11 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — pattern
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility had a medication error rate of 18.75% when six medication errors occurred out of 32 opportunities during the medication administration for three out of seven residents (Resident 3, Resident 34, and Resident 139). The failures resulted in the nursing staff not following physician's orders and the facility's policy and procedures (P&P), and had the potential for medication complications or residents not receiving full therapeutic effects of the medication. Findings: 1. During the medication administration observation on 4/7/24 at 4:35 p.m., Licensed Vocational Nurse F (LVN F) was observed administering five medications for Resident 3. Included in the medications was eye drops, Brimonidine Tartrate [used to lower pressure in the eyes in patients with glaucoma (high pressure in the eyes that may damage nerves and cause vision loss)]. LVN F asked Resident 3 to open the eyes but did not instruct the resident to look up. LVN F instilled one drop of the medication directly to the inner corner of Resident 3's eye without…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-11 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure proper medication storage and labeling of medications when: 1. Opened multi-dose vials/inhalers had no open date; 2. Expired medications were not removed from active stock; 3. A treatment cart was left unlocked and unattended. These failures had the potential for residents to receive medications with reduced efficacy and had the potential for residents to access the unlocked and unattended treatment cart. Findings: 1. During an inspection of a medication cart on 4/7/25 at 3:31 p.m., with Registered Nurse D (RN D), one opened bottle of Pepto Bismol (indication include diarrhea, heartburn, indigestions, nausea, and stomach upset) was identified. The bottle had an expiration of 3/2025. RN D confirmed Pepto Bismol was expired on 3/2025. She further stated it should not be in the cart and should not be used. During an interview on 4/8/25 at 3:27 p.m., with the Director on Nursing (DON), the DON stated any expired medication should not be in the cart because the efficacy of the medication is not the same. 2.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-11 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain sanitary conditions in the kitchen when: 1. A table mounted can opener had brownish colored substances; 2. Six food trays had black substances inside the corners of the trays; and 3. The back and side of a food cart parked inside the kitchen had whitish substances outside food cart surfaces. These failures had the potential to cause foodborne illnesses for residents. Findings: 1. During an initial tour in the kitchen on 4/7/25 at 8:44 a.m., with Registered Dietitian 2 (RD 2), a table mounted can opener had brownish colored substances on the top and sides. RD 2 confirmed the observation and stated the can opener needed to be cleaned and free from rust. 2. During a concurrent observation and interview on 4/7/25 at 8:52 a.m., with RD 2, she confirmed two trays with three loaves of bread were stored in each tray. One tray with 15 bowls, one tray with 27 bowls, and two empty trays were stored together inside a cart. There were black substances inside the corners of each tray. RD 2 stated they will clean…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-11 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide care in a manner that maintained dignity and respect for two of 32 residents when: 1. Maintenance staff intervened while staff attempted to de-escalate Resident 62's angry outburst. 2. Resident 88's urinal was on his bedside table next to food items. These failures had the potential to affect the emotional well-being of the residents. Findings: 1. During an observation on 4/7/25 at 1:31 p.m., there were two maintenance staff working on a handrail in the hallway, close to the nurse's station. Resident 62 was in his wheelchair banging on the door to the nurse's station. One of the maintenance workers, maintenance staff M (MS M) was repeatedly telling Resident 62 to stop banging on the door. MS M stood up from his position fixing the handrail, walked to Resident 62 at the nurse's station, and stood behind Resident 62's wheelchair. MS M continued to tell Resident 62 to stop banging on the door. MS M then grabbed Resident 62's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-11 · tag F0554 — isolated
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to perform interdisciplinary team (IDT, staff from different departments who coordinate the residents care) assessment and obtain a physician order for self-administration of medication for one out of 32 sampled residents (Resident 78) when Resident 78 had over-the-counter medication (OTC, can be purchased without a prescription from medical doctor) bottle of expired Vicks VapoRub (used to treat to relieve coughs, congestion and minor pains) on the bedside tray table. This failure had the potential for unsafe and improper administration of OTC medication. Findings: Review of Resident 78's face sheet (FS, a document that gives a resident's information at a quick glance) indicated Resident 78 was admitted to facility on [DATE]. Resident 78's FS also indicated diagnoses included congestive heart failure (a condition when heart is unable to pump blood efficiently), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (a progressive lung disease characterized…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-11 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow their policy and procedure (P&P) for advance directive (AD, written instructions, such as a living will or durable power of attorney [a document that authorizes to act on behalf of resident] for healthcare when the individual is incapacitated) and physician orders for life-sustaining treatment (POLST, a document that specifies the medical treatments the resident wants to receive during serious illness) form for three of six sampled residents (Resident 17, 10, and 117). These failures could lead to the delivery of unnecessary or inappropriate medical services against a resident's goals and wishes. Findings: Review of Resident 17's face sheet (FS, a document that gives a resident's information at a quick glance) indicated Resident 17 was admitted to facility on 8/13/2019. Review of Resident 17's POLST form date prepared on 2/3/2025 indicated section D for AD was incomplete and left blank. Review of Resident 17's clinical record indicated there was no documented evidence the facility verified, offered, or assisted…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-11 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and facility's document review, the facility failed to maintain resident's rights to privacy and confidentiality for one of five sampled residents (Resident 34) when Resident 34's personal information and care instructions were posted in the room visible to roommate and visitors. This failure had the potential to compromise resident's rights. Finding: During an observation on 4/7/2025 at 10:52 a.m., inside Resident 34's room, Resident 34 was sharing a room with one other resident. Resident 34 was awake and there were two care instructions posted at the wall above Resident 34's head of bed (HOB). One care instruction indicated, SPLINT INSTRUCTION, type of splint: Resting hand splint, The purpose of your splint: Maintain skin integrity and joint ROM (range of motion), When to wear your splint: 4-6 hours daily 5x [times]/week, how to wear splint: apply splint . The second care instruction indicated, Feeding Safely 1. Slow rate of feeding, 2. [Resident 34] need cues to chew thoroughly! 3. Every 3 bites of food - sip of liquid, 4. Check mouth for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-11 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure oxygen (O2) was administered per physician's order for one of three sampled residents (Resident 79) when Resident 79 was receiving 5 liters per minute (LPM) of oxygen. This failure had the potential to affect Resident 79's respiratory health. Finding: During an observation on 4/7/25 at 10:47 a.m., Resident 79 was lying in bed with oxygen concentrator (a device which concentrates the oxygen from ambient air) in used at 5 LPM via nasal cannula (NC, device placed in the nostril used to deliver oxygen). During a review of Resident 79's physician's order indicated an order, dated 5/28/24, Administer oxygen at 3LPM/NC continuously to maintain oxygen saturation [the percentage of oxygen in the blood] > [greater than] 92%. every shift. During an observation on 4/7/25 at 1:54 p.m., inside Resident 79's room. Resident 79 was sleeping with a NC and the O2 concentrator on and set at 5 LPM. During a concurrent observation and interview on 4/7/25 at 3:22 p.m., with Registered Nurse J (RN J), inside Resident 79's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-11 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide dialysis services consistent with professional standards for one of one resident (Resident 100) when: 1. Communication with the dialysis facility was not properly coordinated when Resident 100's dialysis communication records (DCR) were not completed; 2. Resident 100's dialysis care plan did not have a person-centered intervention and 3. Staff was not trained on emergency care for residents with renal diseases, dialysis care, and there was no emergency dialysis kit available. These failures may affect the quality of dialysis care being provided to the residents and had the potential to cause resident health complications. Findings: 1. Review of Resident 100's clinical record indicated he was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including chronic kidney disease stage 5 (CKD, a condition in which the kidney no longer functions normally to filter waste and excess water from the blood as urine) and dependence on renal dialysis (a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 20 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-11 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow its policy and procedure when Registered Nurse I (RN I) did not use a pair of gloves while preparing a hazardous drug (medications that pose potential health risks to individuals who handle them). This failure had the potential to expose RN I to hazardous drug. Findings: During the medication administration observation on 4/8/25 at 9:04 a.m., Registered Nurse I (RN I), was observed preparing five medications for Resident 139. One of the medications was finasteride (used to treat symptoms of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH, a benign [not cancerous] condition in which the prostate gland [prostate is a gland in the male reproductive system] is larger than normal) 5 mg (milligrams, unit of measurement). The finasteride medication blister pack (packaged doses of medication within small, clear, or light-resistant, amber-colored plastic bubbles.) was labeled with a red sticker stating, Hazardous drug. RN I prepared the finasteride medication without using gloves. During a concurrent interview and record…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-11 · tag F0810 — isolated
    Provide special eating equipment and utensils for residents who need them and appropriate assistance.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure to provide adaptive equipment (a device specifically designed to assist with drinking/eating) with meals to one of two sampled residents (Resident 10). This failure had the potential to affect the swallowing ability, fluid intake, health, and well-being of Resident 10. Findings: Review of Resident 10's face sheet (FS, a document that gives a resident's information at a quick glance) indicated Resident 10 was admitted to facility on 1/31/2002 with diagnoses including dysphagia (difficulty swallowing). Review of Resident 10's physician orders indicated, Nosey cup TID (three times per day) with meals for adaptive equipment . dated 11/5/2021. Review of Resident 10's meal tray card for lunch on 4/8/2025 indicated, Nosey Cup (an adaptive drinking cup with a U-shaped cut out on one side, designed to maintain proper head and neck position when drinking for safe swallowing liquids) highlighted in yellow color. During lunch meal observation and interview with certified nursing assistant K (CNA K) in Resident 10's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-04-11 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 10. Review of Resident 27's clinical record indicated he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including COPD and pericardial effusion (build up of extra fluid in the space around the heart.) Review of Resident 27's physician order, dated [DATE], it indicated he had an order for continuous supplemental oxygen at 2 to 5 liters per minute. During an observation on [DATE] at 9:48 a.m., Resident 27 was receiving oxygen via nasal cannula being delivered via an oxygen concentrator. The filters on both sides of the oxygen concentrator machine were dusty, with an accumulation of whitish gray substances on the filter sponges. During an observation and concurrent interview with licensed vocational nurse A (LVN A) on [DATE] at 10:07 a.m., he confirmed both filters on Resident 27's concentrator were dirty and he stated the filters should be changed. During an interview with the director of nursing (DON) on [DATE] at 7:30 a.m., she stated the concentrator filter should be cleaned every week and replaced as…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-26 · tag F0777 — isolated
    Provide or obtain x-rays/tests when ordered and promptly tell the ordering practitioner of the results.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow up on diagnostic results timely for two of three residents (Resident 1 and 2) when: 1. Resident 1's dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA or DXA, bone density scan used to diagnose osteoporosis [bone disease that causes a loss of bone density, weakens bones, and increases the risk of fractures]) scan results were not followed up timely. 2. Resident 2's order to schedule a DEXA scan was not followed up timely. This failure resulted in Resident 1's DEXA scan results not reported to the physician timely and a delay in starting medication to treat Resident 1's osteoporosis. This failure had the potential to result in Resident 2 not receiving necessary treatment/medication timely. Findings: 1. Review of Resident 1's clinical record indicated she was admitted to the facility with schizophrenia disorder that affects a person's ability to think, feel, and behave clearly) and benign neoplasm (abnormal but noncancerous tumor) of meninges (membranes that protect the brain and spinal cord). Review of Resident 1's Change of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-12-13 · tag F0640 — pattern
    Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, facility document and policy review, and review of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) User's Manual, the facility failed to retransmit Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments within required timeframes for 8 (Residents #86, #67, #121, #108, #136, #22, #56, and #65) of 29 residents reviewed for MDS requirements. Findings included: A review of a facility policy titled, MDS, Minimum Data Set/Resident Assessment Instrument, effective on 05/27/2015, revealed, It is the policy of this facility to complete the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI)/Minimum Data Set (MDS) in accordance with the regulations, timeframes and guidelines set forth by OBRA [Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act]-required and Medicare-required assessments. A review of the CMS Long-Term Care Facility RAI 3.0 User's Manual, version 1.18.11, revised in October 2023, revealed in Chapter 2: Assessments for the RAI that a Significant Correction to a Prior Quarterly (SCQA) must be transmitted no later than the MDS Completion Date +…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-13 · tag F0687 — failed to care for feet properly — isolated
    Provide appropriate foot care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure podiatry care, specifically toenail care, was provided for 1 (Resident #130) of 2 sampled residents reviewed for activities of daily living (ADLs). Findings included: A review of a facility policy titled, Fingernails and Toenails, Care of, effective 09/01/2013, revealed, Fingernails and toenails are cleaned and trimmed regularly. Only podiatrists, physicians or licensed nurses provide nail care to diabetic residents, or residents with severe circulatory impairment. A review of an admission Record revealed the facility admitted Resident #130 on 09/27/2023. According to the admission Record, the resident had a medical history to include a diagnosis of need for assistance with personal care. The admission Record did not reflect a diagnosis of diabetes, circulatory impairment, or any nailbed abnormalities. A review of Resident #130's Care Plan revealed a Focus area, initiated 09/27/2023, that indicated the resident had an ADL self-care performance deficit related to impaired…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-13 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure the head of bed (HOB) was elevated 30 degrees during the infusion of enteral feeding as ordered by a physician for 1 (Resident #68) of 2 sampled residents reviewed for tube feeding management. Findings included: A review of a facility policy titled, Enteral Therapy (Tube Management, Feeding, Medications), effective on 09/01/2013, revealed, POLICY Enteral nutrition is provided in a safe and effective manner to promote nutritional well-being and prevent complications of enteral therapy, as ordered by the physician. The section of the policy titled II. Administration of Enteral Feeding / Nutrition, C. Procedure for Feeding Pump Method: specified, 3. Ensure head of bed is elevated minimum of 30-45 degrees before starting the feeding. A review of an admission Record revealed the facility admitted Resident #68 on 01/20/2022. According to the admission Record, the resident had a medical history that included diagnoses of dysphagia (difficulty swallowing) and pneumonitis due to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2021-05-07 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 8. During an observation on 5/3/21 at 10:07 a.m., Resident 78 had signage outside his door and one pair of used gloves and two disposable gowns were exposed outside the garbage lid. During a concurrent observation and interview on 5/3/21 at 10:08 a.m., with LVN M, he confirmed the above observation and stated the garbage can was overflowing and the housekeeper should empty the garbage can. He further stated that Resident 78 is on contact isolation precaution and staff should have disposed the used gowns and pair of gloves inside the garbage can with fully covered by the lid. During an observation on 5/6/21 at 8:25 a.m., Resident 78 had signage outside his door and two pairs of used gloves, two disposable gowns were expose outside the garbage lid cover. During a concurrent observation and interview on 5/6/21 at 8:30 a.m., with LVN K, he acknowledged the above observation. He stated the garbage can was full and the housekeeper should empty the garbage can. He further stated that the overflowing of used gloves and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-05-07 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure respect and dignity was maintained for 3 of 25 sampled residents (38, 91, and 106) when: 1. Resident 38's privacy curtain was not drawn while she was voiding (passing urine from the body) on a toilet seat; 2. Resident 91 did not have appropriate covering or clothing and was exposed to view from her room; and 3. Resident 106's urinary catheter drainage bags (a urinary catheter is a thin, flexible tube used to drain urine from the bladder) was left uncovered. These failures had the potential to affect the emotional and psychosocial well-being of the residents. Findings: 1. During an observation on 5/4/21 at 3:15 p.m., Resident 38 was on a toilet seat beside her bed. Her privacy curtain was not drawn and the resident's door was open to the hallway where other residents and staff passed by. Two activity staff were present in the room. Resident 38's lower body part was exposed naked from waist level to lower legs. During an interview with LVN J on 5/4/21 at 3:35 p.m. , LVN J stated the curtain should be…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-05-07 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to properly store medications and biologicals when: 1. An expired bottle of loperamide (anti-diarrhea) was found in one of the medication carts in Station B; 2. A bottle of Haloperidol (used to treat mental disorder) not kept in its original carton to protect from light was found in medication cart in Station A; 3. A Zioptan (sterile eye drop solution) single use containers not stored in refrigerator was found in the medication cart in Station A; and 4. Two boxes containing normal saline (NS, a mixture of sodium chloride in water that has a number of uses in medicine) were left outside the building. This failure had the potential to affect the efficacy and potency of the drugs. Findings: 1. During an observation on [DATE] at 2:40 p.m., in Station B, there was a bottle of Loperamide HCl (anti-diarrhea) containing several pills which had an expiration date of 11/2020 found in the top drawer of the medication cart. During an interview with LVN…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-05-07 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain sanitary conditions in the kitchen when: 1. Ten dietary staff did not cover their hair completely with a hairnet; 2. Two cans of dried peas in the dry storage room were dented; 3. Chopping boards 2 of 7 had deep cuts; and 4. Two dietary staff used the same potholder that was dropped on the floor to hold the hot tray and pots. These failures had the potential to result in a food borne illness outbreak among a population of vulnerable residents with complex medical conditions. Findings: 1. During an initial kitchen tour with the dietary manager (DM) on 5/3/21 at 9:15 a.m., the DM, registered dietitian (RD), dietary aide (DA) DA Q, DA R, DA S, DA T, DA U, DA V, DA W and DA X, worked in the kitchen. Their hair on the sides and back were not completely covered with a hair net. During an interview with the DM on 5/3/21 at 9:25 a.m., she confirmed the above observation and she stated dietary staff should have covered their hair completely with a hair net. Review of the facility's policy, DRESS CODE FOR…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-05-07 · tag F0637 — isolated
    Assess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete a significant change in status assessment (SCSA) in the minimum data set (MDS, an assessment tool) for one of 25 sampled residents (87) when the resident had significant weight loss, had declined in activities of daily living (ADL, daily self-care tasks, e.g., bathing, toileting, and transferring) and had declined bowel continence. These failures had the potential to result in Resident 87 unable to achieve or maintain optimal status of health, function and quality of life. Findings: Review of Resident 87's face sheet (summary page of a patient's important information) indicated he was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including dysphagia (difficulty of swallowing), major depressive disorder (mood disorder that interferes with daily life) and schizoaffective disorder (a mental illness that can affect your thoughts, mood and behavior). During a concurrent interview and record review on 5/7/21 at 1:41 p.m., with registered…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-05-07 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive person-centered care plan with measurable objectives, goal and person-centered interventions, for one of 25 sampled residents (118). This deficient practice had the potential to result not meeting the resident's needs. Findings: During an observation on 5/3/21 at 10:21 a.m., Resident 118 was lying in bed, with a fall mat on the floor next to his bed and had a low bed. Resident 118 had unclear speech, slurred and mumbled words. A review of Resident 118's face sheet indicated he was readmitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included Schizophrenia (chronic brain disorder characterized by hallucinations, disorganized thoughts and speech, and trouble thinking), Alzheimer's (a progressive disease that destroys memory and mental functions), dementia (decline in memory or other thinking skills severe enough to reduce a person's ability to perform everyday activities), Anxiety disorder (medical condition…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-05-07 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. Review of Resident 117's admission record indicated he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD, a disease that causes airflow blockage and breathing-related problems.) Review of Resident 117's physician order indicated he had an order for oxygen 2 liter (L, a metric unit of volume) per minute (LPM) to 5 LPM as needed every shift related to COPD. During an observation with licensed vocational nurse C (LVN C) on 5/3/21 at 10:25 a.m., Resident 117 was lying in bed and was administered oxygen at 1.25 LPM. During a concurrent interview with LVN C, she confirmed Resident 117 was administered oxygen at 1.25 LPM. LVN C stated it should have been 2LPM. Review of the facility's 9/1/13 policy, Physician Orders indicated Licensed nursing personnel will ensure that telephone and verbal orders will be recorded and implemented. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure services provided meet professional standards for two of 25 sampled…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-05-07 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide the necessary care to maintain good grooming and personal hygiene for one of four residents (84). This failure resulted in Resident 84 having long and dirty fingernails and long toenails. Findings: Review of Resident 84's admission record indicated he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diabetes diagnosis (a disease in which the blood sugar levels are too high.) Review of Resident 84's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a clinical assessment tool), dated 12/28/2020, indicated Resident 84 needed extensive assistance with one-person physical assistance for personal hygiene. During an observation on 5/3/21 at 11:46 a.m., Resident 84 was lying in bed. His fingernails and toenails were long, and his fingernails were dirty. During a concurrent interview with supervisor A (SUP A), she confirmed Resident 84's fingernails and toenails were long, and his fingernails were dirty. SUP A stated sometimes Resident 84 refused to have his nails cut.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-05-07 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure bladder care was provided for one of five residents with indwelling urinary catheter (hollow tube that is inserted into your bladder to drain urine) when Resident 329's urinary collection bag was not emptied. This failure had the potential to cause resident's urinary tract infection (when bacteria gets into urine and travels up to bladder). Findings: During an observation on 5/4/21 at 3:30 p.m., Resident 329's urinary collection bag was full, bulky and hanging beside the bed. It contained more than 1000 ml of amber urine . During an interview with LVN K on 5/04/21 at 3:32 p.m., LVN K stated the urinary collection bag was not emptied since this morning and should have been emptied on every shift to avoid it becoming too full and heavy, which may pull on the catheter. This should occur every 2 to 3 hours or when the bag is about half to three-quarters full. Review of Resident 329's physician order dated 1/25/21, indicated Catheter care daily (per facility protocol) - AM every day shift. Review of Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-05-07 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. During an observation on 5/3/21 at 9:59 a.m., Resident 87's was lying in bed with his breakfast tray untouched and uncovered on top of his bedside table. During an observation and concurrent interview with LVN M on 5/3/21 at 11:17 a.m., he confirmed the above observation. He stated the CNA assigned to Resident 87 did not ask for food replacements and/or offer a food substitute; and lunch would be served soon. During an observation on 5/3/21 at 12:30 p.m., Resident 87's was lying in bed with his lunch tray untouched and uncovered on top of his bedside table. During an observation and concurrent interview with LVN M on 5/3/21 at 1:15 p.m., he confirmed the above observation. He stated the CNA assigned to Resident 87 did not ask for a food substitute and the lunch tray was served around 12:40 p.m. He further stated the food was already cold and needed to be replaced. During multiple observations on 5/4/21 at 8:15 a.m., 5/5/21 at 8:49 a.m., 5/6/21 at 8:45 a.m., and 5/7/21 at 10:00 a.m., Resident 87's was lying in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-05-07 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility had 10.71 percent medication error rate when three (3) medication errors of 28 opportunities were identified during a medication pass for three of seven residents. These failures had the potential to result in an ineffective drug therapy and possible adverse events. Findings: 1. During an observation on 5/4/21 at 8:45 a.m., LVN E poured 15 ml of Centrum liquid (Multivita.m.in & Mineral liquid) over piston (irrigation) syringe to Resident 46's gastrostomy (G-tube, feeding tube placed through the abdomen into the stomach). The medication was not fully administered when there was about one-third back flow of the multivita.m.in liquid spilled out from the piston syringe that was orange colored. During an interview with LVN E on 5/04/21 at 9:00 a.m., LVN E stated only about three-fourth of the multivita.m.in liquid was given to Resident 46 because the medication spilled out from the syringe. Review of Resident 46's physician order for 5/2021, indicated Multivita.m.in & Mineral liquid. Give 15 ml via G-tube one time a day…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-05-07 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure documentation was complete for two of six residents (84 and 94) when Resident 84 and Resident 94 restorative nursing assistance (RNA) order were not transcribed to the Restorative Flow Sheet (RFS). These failures resulted in Residents 84 and 94 not receiving a RNA as ordered. Findings: 1. Review of Resident 84's admission Record indicated he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with muscle weakness diagnosis. Review of Resident 84's physician order indicated he had an RNA order for active assisted range of motion (AAROM) or passive range of motion (PROM) of bilateral upper extremity in all planes while supine in bed as tolerated three times a week for three months, dated 4/23/21. However, this order was not on Resident 84's 5/2021 RFS. During an interview with minimum data set coordinator D (MDSC D) on 5/7/21 at 1:35 p.m., he confirmed the order was not on Resident 84's 5/2021 RFS, and therefore Resident 84 had not received this RNA service.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-05-07 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolated
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure outlet wall plates for two of 12 residents (Residents 8 and 329), were installed in a way to protect residents from potentially dangerous open electrical outlets. Findings: During an observation on 5/03/21 at 11:55 am, Residents 8 and 329's outlet wall plates facing towards the head of the residents bed were broken. During an interview with maintenance supervisor (MS) on 05/04/21 at 3:35 p.m., The MS acknowledged the findings and stated these were not logged in for repair or replacement. During an interview with LVN K on 5/04/21 at 3:45 p.m., LVN K stated if that's were not replaced that can present an electrical shock risk and potential fire hazard to residents' in this room. The facility's undated policy and procedure titled, Maintenance Log Procedure, procedure indicated 1. Fill out the Maintenance Request Form or maintenance log. Clearly state the issue or problem. Also note the urgency (if urgent). 2. Maintenance request form will be checked by Maintenance Dept. on a regular basis to address the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
HELIOS HEALTHCARE, LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL100%since 02/21/2003
DOBBINS, JAMESIndividualDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/29/1993
LYTAL, GEORGEIndividualDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/29/1993
CRESTWOOD BEHAVIORAL HEALTH, INC.OrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/01/2007
BRIOSOS, ELEUTERIAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 09/10/2016
IDYLWOOD HOSPITALOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 01/27/1993

CMS files one row per role, so the 10 rows in the source record cover these 6 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$30.0M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-2.1%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$3.2M
Related-party expense10% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 85%Medicare 1%Other / private 14%

About 85% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $3.2M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 10% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$596per resident / day
operating cost
$18,115per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$584per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in California
$12,167/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$15,178/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,000/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 055211. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-04-11, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next